The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTHE HUB ON CAMPUS - FDP - FDP180011 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS12 change in land use within the site will not change the results of the original traffic study. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Please move the stop sign to the south side of the curb ramp. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/23/2018 03/23/2018: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Demo Plan: The existing hydrant on the west access road needs to be abandoned at the main and the hydrant removed as well because you are relocating this, correct? This needs to be called out on the demo plan. The existing water service to the brew house from the west access road also needs to be removed. The meter and meter pit need full removal. Also, some of the required abandonment work appears to be located outside of your property and outside of the existing utility easements, as such it doesn't appear as though you have a legal right to do this work. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Demo Plan: The existing sanitary sewer through the Potts site is shown to be abandoned, but this needs to be fully removed right? Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Dimension Control Plan: This plan shows handrails right on top of the water meter lid. This isn't going to work as the handrail will inhibit removal of the lid and access to the vault. The water meter needs to be moved away from the handrail and front door to this building anyway. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Dimension Control Plan: Per note 21 on this plan, you are calling out for riprap at all the roof drain locations. This is not appropriate in this setting and CoFC storm drainage criteria discourages the use of riprap anyway. Consider using concrete splash blocks instead. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: Plan and profile sheets are required for both the sanitary sewer system and the storm sewer system. This is a standard FDP plans requirement. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: The storm inlet and outlet pipes to the detention vault are configured different than what I approved at PDP. These pipes are right next to each other and are creating proximity issues for all the other piping in the 14 04/23/2018: Dimension Control Plan: Per note 21 on this plan, you are calling out for riprap at all the roof drain locations. This is not appropriate in this setting and CoFC storm drainage criteria discourages the use of riprap anyway. Consider using concrete splash blocks instead. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: Plan and profile sheets are required for both the sanitary sewer system and the storm sewer system. This is a standard FDP plans requirement. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: The storm inlet and outlet pipes to the detention vault are configured different than what I approved at PDP. These pipes are right next to each other and are creating proximity issues for all the other piping in the area. You are now not meeting separation requirements again. Why has this configuration been changed? Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: The existing transformer and sanitary sewer manhole proximity is not going to work. It now looks like you are proposing to replace the existing sanitary sewer manhole that is adjacent (0-feet separation) from the existing transformer. This is not constructable. Please propose something else. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: The proposed 4-inch water service vault to the south building is located at the front door of this building, and halfway on a ramp with handrails; it's also only separated from the existing storm line by 2'. This area also needs to be adjusted to meet separation requirements and to get the water meter lid away from a handrail and high pedestrian traffic zone. Comment Number: 9 04/23/2018 04/23/2018 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: There are several final level construction plan callouts required for the water system. Also, I've made a suggested revision to the sanitary sewer layout in Elizabeth to allow for required separation from the gas line. Please see redlines. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: One of the water meters has been shifted behind the ROW, but the other one is still located within the ROW. Please work with Engineering to determine if they are ok with a water meter being placed in the ROW. Alternatively, it looks like you could just move the 2-inch water meter behind the ROW, right next to the 4-inch meter vault. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Cross -Section Profile Plan: The water profiles need to also include callouts for fittings or deflections in the profiles. 13 area. You are now not meeting separation requirements again. Why has this configuration been changed? Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: The existing transformer and sanitary sewer manhole proximity is not going to work. It now looks like you are proposing to replace the existing sanitary sewer manhole that is adjacent (0-feet separation) from the existing transformer. This is not constructable. Please propose something else. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: The proposed 4-inch water service vault to the south building is located at the front door of this building, and halfway on a ramp with handrails; it's also only separated from the existing storm line by 2'. This area also needs to be adjusted to meet separation requirements and to get the water meter lid away from a handrail and high pedestrian traffic zone. Comment Number: 10 04/23/2018 04/23/2018 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: There are several final level construction plan callouts required for the water system. Please see redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Utility Plan: One of the water meters has been shifted behind the ROW, but the other one is still located within the ROW. Please work with Engineering to determine if they are ok with a water meter being placed in the ROW. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Cross -Section Profile Plan: The water profiles need to also include callouts for fittings or deflections in the profiles. Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Demo Plan: The existing hydrant on the west access road needs to be abandoned at the main and the hydrant removed as well because you are relocating this, correct? This needs to be called out on the demo plan. The existing water service to the brew house from the west access road also needs to be removed. The meter and meter pit need full removal. Also, some of the required abandonment work appears to be located outside of your property and outside of the existing utility easements, as such it doesn't appear as though you have a legal right to do this work. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Demo Plan: The existing sanitary sewer through the Potts site is shown to be abandoned, but this needs to be fully removed right? Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Dimension Control Plan: This plan shows handrails right on top of the water meter lid. This isn't going to work as the handrail will inhibit removal of the lid and access to the vault. The water meter needs to be moved away from the handrail and front door to this building anyway. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 11 proposed garage vault is 6751 cf. However, the amount of existing detention on this site, from the Potts PUD drainage report, is 7660 cf. Also, I'm not sure how hydroCAD is calculating the pond volume. CoFC requirements for sizing detention ponds is typically using a mass balance approach using CoFC rainfall data. Please fix this. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/25/2018 04/25/2018: SWMM: Per City SWMM analysis for this area, the tie-in 100-yr HGL at your storm ID node "D1" is 37.30. Please update your piping hydraulic analysis to reflect this higher HGL tie-in. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Please revise the title on all sheets as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Please revise the Benchmark Statement on all sheets as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Tim Tuttle, , TTUTTLE@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: The Traffic letter has been reviewed and staff concurs that the IN sedimentation during construction activities and the paver blocks should be installed last. Please check the paver cross section on sheet 13 as it does not work for a 15 inch pipe. We can send you updated copies of the paver and bioretention construction details. The Erosion Control Plan and report do not meet minimum standards. For guidance on these standards please refer to the document located at the City website: hftps://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/Accomp_Doc. pdf. The main missing items is a discussion in the report of the actual measures being implemented on this site rather than general requirements. Add note stating that any tracking of sediment or debris must be cleaned by the contractor within 24 hours. Please provide protection for downstream inlet on Elizabeth. The Erosion Control Security Estimate should be updated to reflect final measures used. Please refer to redlines for additional comments. Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Storm Sewer Plan: All of the proposed storm pipes are required to be profiled and included in the construction drawings. This is a standard FDP plans requirement. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Storm Sewer Plan: There are a couple of inlets called out as "manholes" on this sheet. The inlets need to be called out correctly with the proposed inlet type and size included. These also need to be sized in the drainage report. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Storm Sewer Plan: The manhole at the detention vault outfall needs to be drawn to scale and drawn with the weir wall and pipes coming into and out of this structure so it can be shown to work. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Storm Sewer Plan: There are several locations where storm piping and/or grading is being proposed off of your property. There is one area where it doesn't look like there is an existing drainage easement on the south side of the south building. You will need the adjacent property owner's permission to do work on their property particularly in areas where there is no easement. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Proposed Drainage Plan: The required volume for the raingardens shown in the table on this sheet doesn't match the text callouts on the plan. Please reconcile. Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: LID: Please note that we do not require orifice control on rain gardens. For Rain Garden #2 it looks like you may have used an incorrect area to size this rain garden. Please review. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Detention Vault: It looks like the calculated storage available in the 9 Refuge. > IBC 403.5.5 - Luminous stair treads as per Section 1025.2.1 will be required. > Please also indicate intent to comply with the following IFC Sections: 508.1.1 - Command center location approval 508.1.4 - Layout approval 508.1.5 - Storage 907.2.11.7 - Smoke detection > 1009.6 - Provide Areas of Refuge with 2-way communication in stairwells. > Please update Compliance Matrix and resubmit to PFA. Building 2: Please submit a High Rise Compliance Matrix for Bldg. 2. As part of this comprehensive plan to offset aerial apparatus access at Bldg. 2, additional measures shall include: > Rated stair towers > Walk -out roof access > Standpipes in stairwells (and as elsewhere required). This may prompt need for a fire pump. If so, refer also to comment No. 7 regarding the ability for one fire pump to serve both buildings. Also be cognizant of Class I standpipe separation distances of 200' in sprinkled buildings (IBC905.4). Finally for convenience sake, PFA is asking if you can submit the revised compliance matrix documents in an editable form along with a .pdf copies. Thank you and feel free to contact me directly with any questions. Department: Planning Services Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, Iholland@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/20/2018 04/20/2018: The Hornbeams -- these really struggle in places that are not protected from winter winds and Spring cold snaps. I have seen them die to the ground on several occasions, but they seem to do okay in protected areas. Would suggest not using them on the west side of the building and replacing these with a fastigiate English Oak or Crimson Spire Oak. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/20/2018 04/20/2018: With the architectural plan sheets, please in include a general specification noting all proposed material colors. A note can be added to say "or approved equal". Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/20/2018 04/20/2018: Please adjust the plaza area to provide a larger planting area around the existing Linden to the east. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-224-6035, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: Please provide a sequencing and construction schedule for the pavers. If the subgrade is constructed for access, it needs to be protected from 0 Turning templates will need to confirm a single, fluid movement of a vehicle turning into and then out of the garage to complete a full maneuver. Currently the Autoturn exhibits show the vehicle's location being moved several feet to the left or right at the terminus of the hammerhead so as to ideally reposition it for the next maneuver. Please confirm that a continuous maneuver is possible and resubmit to PFA. Comment Number: 6 04/24/2018: FDC LOCATIONS Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 > FDC location on Bldg. B is approved. > FDC location on Bldg. A will need to move north, to the NE corner of the building. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SERVED BY ONE FIRE PUMP Both buildings will require a full NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system. Should a fire pump be required in Bldg. B, a single fire line/fire pump may be proposed to serve multiple buildings, the configuration will need to be shown on the Utility Plans. The plan shall be approved by Water Utilities Engineering and a covenant agreement will be required. The applicant shall coordinate fire line locations with Water Utilities. Please contact Water Utilities Engineering for further details at (970)221-6700 or WaterUtilitiesEng@fcgov.com. Comment Number: 8 04/24/2018: COURTYARD FDC Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 PFA is wanting to revisit the issue of access to the interior courtyard so as to determine if a hose connection is required at that point. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: ADDRESS POSTING & WAYFINDING The primary entrance to Bldg. B is not clear and therefore, emergency response to this building remains in question. A plan for address posting and wayfinding shall be submitted to PFA for review and approval PRIOR to FDP approval. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF COMPLIANCE The document titled, High Rise Compliance Matrix dated, Nov. 3, 2017 detailing alternative means and measures for Building 1 was evaluated with respect to Bldg. 1. As previously described, neither Bldg.1 or 2 are code compliant with regard to aerial apparatus access and the applicant will need to detail the intent to meet code compliance via alternative means at building 2 as well. Floor plans of both Bldgs. would be helpful in this code evaluation process. A detailed plan of the rooftop amenity spaces on Bldg. 1 would also be very helpful. Building 1: > Project intends to include Smoke -proof enclosures as per IBC 403.5.4. Per the fire marshal, he would like to know if mechanical pressurization vs. a natural ventilation alternative method will be employed. > IBC 403.5.3.5 - Stairway communication shall comply with 1009.6 for Areas of the process for adopting the 2018 International Fire Code. Building plan reviews shall be subject to the adopted version of the fire code in place at the time of plan review submittal and permit application. Comment Number: 2 04/24/2018: LABELING Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 > PARKING PLAN SHEET 3: Scale is still mislabeled at 1 "=40'. The correct scale appears to be 1 "=30'. > SITE PLAN: Buildings A & B should be differentiated on the plans. Comment Number: 3 04/24/2018: BOLLARDS Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 Restricted fire access will not be permitted on the east side of Bldg. A. No collapsible bollards allowed. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: ROOFTOP AMENITIES & OTHER AREAS OF ASSEMBLY > A plan for rooftop amenities shall include an egress plan from any assembly occupancy in compliance with IFC 1006.3. > Fire pits & grills fueled by natural gas may be allowed in association with multi -family buildings with prior approval of the fire marshal. Wood burning or smoke producing fire pits & grills are strictly prohibited. Fire pits & grills shall be located in a permanent/fixed location, such as a built-in kitchen or fireplace with UL fixtures as appropriate. Connections shall have hard pipe, not flex pipe and be equipped with an emergency shut off. Fire pits and grills fueled by natural gas shall have a 10' separation to combustible construction and/or vegetation. This distance is measured both horizontally and vertically from the fire source. > Landscaping on roofs shall be shown to comply with IFC 317. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: FIRE TURNAROUND ON GROUND LEVEL PARKING: BLDG. A > The Fairview Apts. will be dedicating a fire lane across the southern limits of their property to be continuous with the EAE at The Hub; however, as they are not able to connect to the Public Way, the proposed turnaround at The Hub remains a requirement for this development. > The turnaround requires a simple hammerhead maneuver and not the complex fire lane currently proposed. The EAE should be simplified within the parking garage. > Fire lane signage required at the entry to the parking garage to alert Engine Operators that this space has been designated for that purpose. Signage details to be approved prior to building permit. > Turning templates indicate potential problems. Please revise and resubmit based upon the following observations: Turning templates indicate that swing of fire apparatus involves areas outside the dedicated EAE. Front end swings across a hatched area at entrance to garage. This area should be identified as part of the EAE. C have increased since the last project submittal. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investmen t-development-fees Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: The parking garage appears to be notched out around the proposed transformer location up to the roof. However, the basement does not appear to be notched out below the transformer location. How will the basement be built to allow for primary electric lines to extend into the new transformer? Primary electric lines are typically 40-48" deep. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: There is a conflict with note S7 on the utility plan and Light and Power existing electrical switch cabinet. Note S7 calls for a manhole to be constructed adjacent to the electrical switch cabinet with no separation/buffer from the cabinet. This seems impossible to build without undermining the existing cabinet. Can the new manhole be relocated west, away from the cabinet? Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: Previous C-1 submittal documents anticipated a 2000 amp (277/480V) 3-phase electrical service (20 cables of 600 MCM). Have power requirements changed? Please keep in mind that we are limited to a total of 48 secondary cables for 3phase transformers. If more than 48 secondary cables are needed for the development then an additional transformer will need to be placed on site. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: Light & Power will need AutoCAD files of the site plan, utility plans, and landscape drawings once approved Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: Once power requirements are known, final commercial service information forms (C-1 form) and a one line diagrams for commercial meters will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering. A link to the C-1 form is below: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development- forms-guidelines-regulations Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: Where will the electric meters be installed? All residential units need to be individually metered and all meters need to be accessible. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, iynxwiler@poudre4ire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 04/24/2018: 2018 IFC CODE ADOPTION Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 Be advised that Poudre Fire Authority and the City of Fort Collins are beginning 5 B and include the number of units and bedrooms in each. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 03/28/2018: The Community Recycling Ordinance (No. 109 2016) requires that all new business and multifamily complexes subscribe to recycling service that is at minimum 1/3 of their overall service capacity(total bin capacity x number of weekly pickups, include both trash and recycling when calculating overall service capacity). In general recycling containers must be at least 50% the size of proposed trash containers to meet this requirement. Please make sure proposed containers meet this requirement and that adequate space is provided in all enclosures. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/04/2018: Please provide the door height and interior height of the "loading / trash staging area". 25ft of overhead clearance will need to be provided for the servicing of trash/recycling containers. Comment Number: 14 03/28/2018 04/04/2018 Comment Originated: 04/27/2018 04/27/2018: On the plan enlargements for the trash/recycling enclosures please include the following: 1. labels for all proposed dumpsters as either "trash" or "recycle". 2. Include and label the trash and recycling chutes for both enclosures. 3. Include the additional entrance on the main enclosure that will be used to bring dumpsters over from the secondary enclosure. 4. Include narrative explaining that staff will be responsible to move dumpsters between the secondary and main enclosure as needed and that pick-up will only occur at the main enclosure. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 04/27/2018 04/27/2018: The secondary trash and recycling enclosure located on the multi -family building should be expanded as discussed so that if needed in the future it could fit two 4 cubic yard dumpsters and leave space for pedestrian traffic around them. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 04/27/2018 04/27/2018: A concrete pad or "crosswalk" should be provided between the trash and recycling enclosure on the multi -family building and the parking garage to ease the transport of dumpsters. Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-27729 tiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: As discussed, numerous system modifications to existing Light and Power facilities will be needed as part of this project. System modification costs are the responsibility of the developer/owner. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees related to this project. Please note that capacity fees may 4 separation by shifting the walls further away from the trees, or even eliminating the walls completely. As discussed at our most recent site -visit, please provide Forestry with a detailed cross-section sketch of each tree -to -wall separation. We would also like to understand the degree of excavation involved on each side of the trees. (Email sent to Sam Coutts 3/8/17) Forestry received an email from the applicant on March 8, 2017 explaining where some adjustments had been made to help protect these trees. After reviewing this communication and diagrams, there are still additional questions Forestry would like explored and answered by the applicant. Can the east wall by the west tree be adjusted further to the east to provide additional separation? Also, please explore removing the south wall by the west tree (similar to the removal of the wall by the east tree). Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 8 4/23/2018: There are (12) existing trees shown on sheet 4 that are either not inventoried, shown in the tree mitigation table, or shown on proposed plans on sheet 5. Trees that are off -site should be shown on sheet 5 with a note near each of these trees that states: existing off -site trees to remain. If these trees are to be removed, their inventory and mitigation information should be collected and included on the plans. Trees that are on -site, but have no symbol indicating their removal/retention should be inventoried and included on the mitigation table. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 4/23/2018: Trees #4, 9, 20, and 22 do not have a symbol — please add this to sheet 4. In addition, two different symbols are used to show existing trees, please be consistent in labeling trees. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 4/23/2018: 1 only counted 38 mitigation trees required. Please correct the tree mitigation summary table. You may omit one upsized mitigation tree from the plant list as well. In addition, please label all mitigation trees on sheet 5 with a `M' by the symbol. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 4/23/2018: Please confirm irrigation will be provided to the three new street trees in grates. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 4/23/2018: There are two existing trees on the east boundary of the Uptown Plaza site. Please confirm that the locations of (3) CBF — Pyramidal European Hornbeam will not conflict or be shaded out by existing trees on the adjacent property. Department: Internal Services Contact: Jonathon Nagel, ]nagel@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 03/28/2018 03/28/2018: Please provide labels on the site plan for Building A and Building 3 Contact: Molly Roche, mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 4/24/2018: Continued: TO BE DISCUSSED AT STAFF REVIEW MEETING 4/25/18 11 /17/2017: Continued: Please show the cross-section detail that includes the tree location. City Forestry would like to review the extent to which the roots might be damaged. 6/12/2017: Continued: Thank you for stating that you can provide a cross-section of Tree #1. Please submit this to Forestry for review. In regards to Tree #3, please provide additional detailed information as to why this tree cannot be retained. Submit to Forestry and Project Planner for review. 3/8/2017: Please provide a cross-section of the two existing Linden trees in regards to the proposed wall. Forestry would like to further review the distance between the trees and the structure. Additionally, please provide additional information regarding the preservation and protection of the two linden trees, and to what measures construction will impact roots. What is the foundation material for the walls? Please explore using pylon spanning to limit excavation near tree roots. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 4/24/2018: Continued: TO BE DISCUSSED AT STAFF REVIEW MEETING 4/25/18 11 /17/2017: Continued: Tree section detail will be provided at FDP. Comment continued until FDP. 6/12/2017: Continued: Thank you for stating that you can provide a cross-section of Tree #1. Please submit this to Forestry for review. In regards to Tree #3, please provide additional detailed information as to why this tree cannot be retained. Submit to Forestry and Project Planner for review. 3/8/2017: Currently, the plans show the wall proposed at approximately 3 feet away from the east tree, and 4 feet away from the west tree. With the goal of doing everything in our power to preserve the trees in mind, I recall that Sam Coutts, Jason Holland, Ralph Zentz, and Molly Roche discussed providing additional 2 easements depicted. The easements within the development plan should be indicated as dedicated by the plat. The existing easements that are offsite should be indicated as "existing" and reference the subdivision/dedication document that established the easement. It appears that work within Pott's PUD and Matador Apartments Phase III, as well as Diamond Shamrock Corner Store. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: The abandonment of the water main shown offsite of the property within the Diamond Shamrock Corner Store, is it clear that this work can be done on the property, when it appears this area is not a utility easement but an access easement? Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: The transition from the vertical curb to driveover curb and the extent of the driveover curb should be more clearly defined. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/24/2018 04/24/2018: Please provide profile information for the sanitary line in Elizabeth Street. Review of adequate cover over roadway, depth for excavation and patching limits, etc. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/25/2018 04/25/2018: The construction of the project will need to be reviewed and discussed further as a contractor is brought on board. We will want to understand further the limits of any impact to the right-of-way with regards to construction staging, equipment storage, crane placement and crane arm swing, etc. The contractor should get in contact with Steve Cicione as soon as construction concepts are available. Steve can be reached at: Email: scicione@fcgov.com Office: 970-221-6659 Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 04/25/2018 04/25/2018: There appears to be work within the Matador Phase IV property without an existing easement. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970416-42909 sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Please refer to Current Planning and Forestry comments on landscape plans. Arctic Fire Dogwood is a good tough plant once established and red color adds winter interest. Environmental Planning has no further comments on landscape plans. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018: Lighting plan luminaire schedule showing only 3000K or less CCT for outdoor lighting. Thank you for supporting City Night Sky Objectives. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018: No further comments. Thank you for working closely with City staff during this development review process. 04/23/2018 04/23/2018 Department: Forestry Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/de velopmentrevlew April 27, 2018 Sam Coutts RIPLEY DESIGN, INC. 419 CANYON AVE, STE 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: The Hub on Campus, FDP180011, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Jason Holland, at 970-224-6126orjholland@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: The patching shown on the demo plan needs to be expanded to encompass the full center turn lane, the area not currently shown to be patched south of the center turn lane, and the full width of the road from between the two small patches of abandonment on the north side of the street as part of our patching requirements as reviewed by our Construction Inspection Manager. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: The truncated domes shown on the drive approach out to Elizabeth should be shown more vertical than curved, to provide indication of the pedestrian moving east -west. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: The variance request submitted is generally OK in concept, however I would question the rationale of the second sentence in the first justification as being part of the justification as I don't believe it has relevance to a design criteria variance. I would prefer that the second sentence be removed and then can support the granting of the variance request. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/23/2018 04/23/2018: Please provide more detail on the plans regarding the status of