Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLIND PROPERTY - FDP - 39-94C - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSTopic: Underpass Number: 245 Created: 6/3/2003 See detail 1108 for City railing/parapet wall requirements for the bridge/underpass for CRl 1 and add it to the detail sheet. Also, see the city guidelines for pedestrian facilities and AASHTO for railing requirements. The wooden fencing shown does not meet any of these standards, design or safety. Topic: Utility Number: 13 Created: 11 /5/2002 See 16.3.1 for access ramp requirements. Provide directional ramps at all intersections. Access ramps must line up with the ramp across the street on all T-Intersections. Must provide a separate access ramp where rollover curb is used. A driveway will not suffice. 3/11 /3: Repeat comment. In addition, an access ramp shown lining up with a sidewalk connection must be the same width as the sidewalk it connects to. Remove the access ramp shown at the street widening. See redlines. 5/30/3: Repeat comment. The access ramp shown lining up with the sidewalk on Brightwater Drive must be the some width as the sidewalk it is providing access to. Number: 54 Created: 11 /12/2002 See detail 7-24 for all street widening requirements. Those proposed do not meet standards. 3/11/3: Repeat comment. Still not meeting the min PC to PCR. Show and label Rl, R2, R3, W and flowline as required by 7-24. 5/30/3: Repeat comment. Please provide a detail (per 7-24) and show/label R1-R3, W. Number: 56 Created: 11 /12/2002 Sheet CS350 - see redlines. Since the proposed alleys are actually private drives, figure 71-12F should not be included. A simple cross-section would be sufficient or at least remove the term "alleys". Call it Shared Residential Driveways or something to that effect. 3/11 /3 and 5/30/3: Repeat comment but now sheet CS116. Please remove all reference to the word "alley" as they are not being dedicated as public alleys. Number: 169 Created: 3/13/2003 .Please provide some grading/spot information that I can tie into the CR52 road plans so that I can make sure that these two projects will work together. 5/30/3: As of our pre -submittal meeting, you had the good suggestion of adding spot elevations at the PCs to make sure the two sets of plans line up. Unfortunately, the PCs are showing two different spot elevations - see CR52 and Forecastle for example. Number: 175 Created: 3/13/2003 See redlines and Appendix E4 for other comments. Number: 213 Created: 6/3/2003 Cover Sheet, Note 14 - Add the variances to the street separation. List the code section, the standard and then what the variance was granted for. Number: 214 Created: 6/3/2003 Cover Sheet - Add note #10 from the CR 52 plans here. Number: 215 Created: 6/3/2003 CSl 15 - Remove all references to alleys and put Private Drive (or ?) instead. Page 5 Owners of the irrigation line will need to sign of on the underpass plans Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Mark Jackson Topic: General Number: 198 Created: 5/27/2003 My only concern is the potential pedestrian safety hazard presented by the ped connection shown on LCR 52. This connection to the north -side sidewalk is roughly aligned with a similar ped, connection in Gillespie Farm/Maple Hill. This might invite ped's to cross mid -block across a 2L Arterial roadway. Not a deal breaker but a situation we might want to monitor. Red -lined drawings are available at the Current Planning front desk. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Yours Truly, Bob Barkeen City Planner Page 10 Please call out top of pipe elevation for the ELCO water line crossing of the storm sewer on CR 52. Topic: Drainage Plans Number: 248 Created: 6/4/2003 Please provide a design and a detail for the emergency spillway on the detention pond. Please design a low flow channel in the detention pond taking trickle flows from the storm sewer points of outfall draining Into the pond to the pond outlet structure. Please consolidate all details to the detail sheets at the end of the plan set. Topic: Erosion Control Number: 87 Created: 11 /19/2002 3/6/03 Please add a note requiring all disturbed areas to be re -seeded and mulched. 5/28/03 Plan is OK. Topic: Grading Plans Number: 249 Created: 6/6/2003 Please show proposed contours on the grading plan currently only 5-foot contours are called out. Call out block numbers on the grading plan. Avoid back yard swales that exceed 3 lots whenever possible. Call out pipe inverts and all low point elevations. Topic: Overall Utility Plans Number: 94 Created: 11 /19/2002 6/4/03 Please add size lvoe of all proposed and existing facilities on the overall utility plan Topic: Phasing Plans Number: 247 Created: 6/4/2003 Please call out the size and dimensions of the proposed temporary swales on the phasing plan. Please indicate that these will be seeded and maintained in operational function by the developer. Will the area that is outside of Phase 1 be disturbed. If yes please'Indicate where and add a note requiring all of that area to be reseeded. Provide a detail of the capping that will be done to the storm sewer on the phasing plan when there is no downstream outfall connection. Provide erosion protection at the points where temporary swales enter the detention pond. The inlets and storm sewers on CR 52 will be built with the CR 52 plans. Please add a note on the phasing plans indicating that. Topic: Underpass Plans Number: 88 Created: 11 /19/2002 6/3/03 Please show Baker Lateral on the plans. It seems that the underpass in CR 11 will conflict with the relocated irrigation line. Please show an irrigation line profile and detail how it.will cross the underpass. Where will low flows from underpass be directed to ? Page 9 Number: 186 Created: 5/16/2003 Add streetlight to the northeast corner of lot 8 - Forecastle Drive. Number: 187 Created: 5/16/2003 Streetlight should be shown on plans at the intersection of Clipper Way and Sternwheeler Drive on the southeast corner of the intersection. Number: 188 Created: 5/16/2003 Eliminate streetlights should shown on plans between lots 6/7 and lots 16/17 on Bow Side Drive. Instead streetlight should be located between lots 4/5 on Bow Side Drive. Number: 189 Created: 5/16/2003 Streetlight should be shown on plans between lots 2/3 - Block 8, Clipper Way. Number: 190 Created: 5/16/2003 Streetlights should be shown on plans to both the southwest corner of Block 12, Tract A and the southeast corner of Block 12, Tract A along the north side of County Road 52. Number: 191 Created: 5/16/2003 Streetlight should be shown on plans between lots 9/10 - Block 8 along Bar Harbor Drive. Number: 192 Created: 5/16/2003 For Correct spacing requirements of streetlights, the streetlight shown near the pedestrian path at County Road 52, should be located approximately 90-fe6t east, between lots 12/13. Number: 193 Created: 5/16/2003 In order to prevent future problems encountered with installation of electric lines, street trees, sidewalk, landscaping, etc. are not to be installed along the east side of Bar Harbor Drive or along the north side of Brightwater Drive east of Fairwater until such time as these parcels of land develop. Topic: Site Number: 196 Created: 5/27/2003 All electric facilities must be shown on utility plans. This includes electric line locations, vaults, streetlights, etc. 'Typical Layout" is not sufficient. Electric facilities have been coordinated with Sear Brown and must be shown on utility plans. Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: County Road 52 Improvements Number: 86 Created: 11 /19/2002 6/3/03 Please refer to redlined plans for comments on the CR52 plans. Please specify when the shown storm sewers will be built on the phasing plan. Call out and label contour elevations on the grading plan. Call out pedestrian box invert on road profile. Please explain how the 54"pipe crossing of CR52 sized. According to the study completed on June 2nd by ACE the Boxelder Creek mosterplan a bridge crossing is needed for the crossing of storm flows under CR 52 in the future. The 100-year flows anticipated for this section are 810 cfs of storm flows and 125 cfs of irrigation flows. The Developer shall be required to post an escrow for half of the future bridge crossing of CR 52. Please provide an estimate of the cost of such a crossing. Please provide ditch company signatures on the plans showing the outfall pipe into the Canal No.8 Ditch Page 8 CS311 - See redlines. Spot elevations donl match the intersection details. Please look at the L for Sternwheeler Drives Right Flowline. Is this right? Number: 232 Created: 6/3/2003 CS312 - Place the detail of the street widening here as requested in an earlier comment. Also, spot elevation conflicts with intersection details. Correct overlapping labeling. Number: 233 Created: 6/3/2003 See redlines. Qs on stationing at the bulb out. Number: 234 Created: 6/3/2003 CS330 - Some of the transitions on the next few pages are pretty for back. Please transition a little closer to the intersection. Or is there a reason that is occurring so far back? Missing a spot. Correct the ramp note detail. Name the unnamed street. Correct the ramp width. Number: 235 Created: 6/3/2003 CS331 - See redlines and previous comments regarding this sheet. Correct the ramp detail in the Legend. Number: 236 Created: 6/3/2003 CS332 - Some spot elevation problems. Correct the ramp detail in the Legend. See redlines. Number: 237 Created: 6/3/2003 CS333 - Correct the ramp detail in the Legend. Missing spots, problem spots. Number: 238 Created: 6/3/2003 CS400 - See appendix E6 Number: 239 Created: 6/3/2003 CS401 - Correct the street cut note to read: Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with City street repair standards. Number: 240 Created: 6/3/2003 CS402 - Add the street cut note. Number: 241 Created: 6/3/2003 CS601 - Correct the term Alley to read Private Drive Number: 242 Created: 6/3/2003 CS700 - Correct the ramp detail in the legend. Number: 243 Created: 6/3/2003 CS703 - Provide a curve table for the other two legs of the sidewalk connections so that they can be laid out in the field. Only the information for the one leading to the underpass on CRl 1 was given. Number: 244 Created. 6/3/2003 CS704 - Overlapping labeling. Correct the ramp in the legend. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore Topic: General Number: 185 Created: 5/16/2003 Show all street lighting on landscape plan and utility plans. Streetlights must maintain minimum clearances to streetlights.. Page 7 Number: 216 Created: 6/3/2003 CS116 - Relabel Alley as Private Drives, all instances, all sheets. Do not ghost the proposed barricades. Will need to contact Ward Standford or Eric Bracke to see if they have any comments on the striping sheet. They usually prefer to have the interim and ultimate striping shown on two separate sheets. If they are ok with this as shown, then please relabel sheet as "Interim and Ultimate Striping" and label the Interim flowline or edge of pavement so that it is as clear as possible. Number: 217 Created: 6/3/2003 CS131 and all others that apply - the proposed ramps and sidewalks need to show how they tie into existing ramps and sidewalks along the west side of CR11. Show your removals so that it is very clear what is staying and what is coming out. This will help Street Oversizing bid out and construct this road in the future. Number: 218 Created: 6/3/2003 CS132 - See redlines. Number: 219 Created: 6/3/2003 CS200 - See Appendix E6 for sconability requirements (min font size, overlapping, etc). This sheet is a little difficult to read and/or reproduce. Number: 220 Created: 6/3/2003 CS221, CS222 - Some comment as sheet CS200, Also, a 12' crosspan is labeled as 6'. Number: 221 CS225 - See redlines. Created: 6/3/2003 Number: 222 Created: 6/3/2003 CS260 - See redlines. Overlapping labeling, correct the term "alley", correct note 4, show barricades. Number: 223 CS261 - See redlines. Overlapping labeling. Created: 6/3/2003 Number: 224 Created: 6/3/2003 CS280 - Overlapped label, change the term "alley" to "private drive". Number: 225 Created: 6/3/2003 CS300 - See redlines. Provide directional ramps at all street corners. Show how the proposed sidewalk/ramps ties into the existing and what will come out. Number: 226 Created: 6/3/2003 CS302 - conflict in the crosspan notation/size among the sheets. The access ramp to the proposed park must be the same width as the sidewalk (repeat comment). Number:227 . Created: 6/3/200 3 CS303 - some as above. Correct overlapping labeling. Spot elevation conflict with the intersection details. Number: 228 Created: 6/3/2003 CS305 - Overlapping labeling. Number: 229 Created: 6/3/2003 CS308 - Overlapping labeling. Number: 230 Created: 6/3/2003 CS308 - Spot elevation conflicts with the CR52 plans. Number: 231 Created: 6/3/2003 Page 6 5/30/3: Label the remaining sight distance triangles and add the sight distance restrictions note to the Site plan. Number: 195 Created: 5/23/2003 Remove all reference to the word "alley". Use private drive instead. Topic: Soils Report Number: 147 Created: 3/12/2003 Please provide a Soils Report as required by LCUASS. 5/30/3: Repeat comment. Topic: Street Names Number: 134 Created: 3/11 /2003 Is it Flagstaff Drive or Flagstaff Place? Not all the plan sets are consistent. 5/30/3: Please correct sheet CS116 of the utility plans. See redlines Topic: Street Sections Number: 151 Created: 3/12/2003 The typical street sections provided are not correct. List each street under each cross section by stationing because some streets have more than one cross section. Label each section with N/S/E/W and move this sheet up behind the cover sheet or the site plan. 5/30/3: Please label each typical street section with the N/S/E/W direction. Number: 167 Created: 3/13/2003 Remove all reference to "alley". See redlines. 5/30/3: See redlines, sheet CS116 - just one more alley word to take out. Topic: Striping Sheet Number: 137 Created: 3/11/2003 Provide an interim striping sheet and label the ultimate as "ultimate." 5/30/3: Now the striping sheet is labeled as "Ultimate" but the sheet has added the interim condition as well. Please split the sheets into interim and ultimate. Number: 176 Created: 3/13/2003 Please contact Eric Bracke (224-6062) for comments regarding the signing and striping sheet. 5/30/3: Have you contacted the City Traffic Engineer for comments on this sheet? Topic: Traffic Study Number: 28 Created: 11 /12/2002 Please contact Eric Bracke at 224-6062 regarding the TIS. A roundabout analysis must be provided for all arterial/arterial intersections. Additional ROW may be required to accommodate a dedicated northbound right turn lane on CR 52, to be built now or in the future. Please see LCUASS Chapter 8 for Intersection requirements and Chapter 4 for TIS requirements. The TIS must be detailed enough to sufficiently address any modification and/variance requested by this development. 3/11/3: Repeat comment. 5/30/3: The roundabout analysis was received and accepted by Eric Bracke. However, the long-range analysis is still missing from the TIS (only the short range was provided). Please provide the long-range analysis in the TIS. Page 4 Provide intersection details per 7-27, 7-28 and 3.3.4. 3/1 1 /3: Repeat comment. What's shown is incomplete. 5/30/3: Some of the intersection details do not match the elevations shown on the plan and profile sheets. Some details show spot elevations that create a low spot. See redlines. Topic: Plat Number: 16 Created: 11 /6/2002 Provide all easements and vacations by separate document as stated on the plat. 3/11/3: Repeat Comment. 5/30/3: Repeat Comment. Number: 125 Created: 3/11 /2003 From Technical Services: Many bearing and distances missing. Please review before the next submittal. 5/30/3: Repeat comment. Number: 127 Created: 3/11 /2003 From Technical Services: Separate document reception number vacations need to be shown on this plat. 5/30/3: Repeat comment. Number: 203 From Technical Services - North arrow on sheet 2 is wrong. Number: 204 From Technical Services - Boundary and Legal close. Number: 205 From Technical Services - In Block 6, is it an alley or tract? Number: 206 From Technical Services - Additional ROW notes. Number: 207 From Technical Services - Show County Road 52 on sheet 3 Created: 6/2/2003 Created: 6/2/2003 Created: 6/2/2003 Created: 6/2/2003 Created: 6/2/2003 Number: 208 Created: 6/2/2003 From Technical Services - Show distances, section corner plat to Sl /4 Section 29. Number: 209 Created: 6/2/2003 From Technical Services - Solid lines, separate tracts from ROW. Number: 210 Created: 6/2/2003 From Technical Services - Curve table has incorrect info (this effects lot dimensions). Please review. Number: 246 Created: 6/3/2003 Incorrect radii shown, see redlines. Topic: Site Number: 131 Created: 3/11 /2003 Remove all incorrect sight distance triangles. Page 3 Topic: General Number: 27 Created: 11 /12/2002 Approval of these plans is contingent upon the approval of the design of CRs 11 and 52. This development must be coordinated with the Gillespie development (Maple Hill) to the south. All streets at CR 52 must align with Gillespie's proposed streets. In addition, this developer is responsible for the Interim design improvements to the Vine and Lemay intersection. In the event that the transportation tax is approved, the money is appropriated by the city, and the improvements are scheduled for construction, this developer will no longer be responsible for any improvements to the Vine and Lemay Intersection. However, it could be years before this happens. If this development wants to go to construction before then, then the developer would need to design and construct the Interim improvements to Vine and Lemay. 3/11 /3 and 5/30/3: Keeping this item open. Number: 37 Created: 11 /12/2002 Coordinate the comments given under various sections so that all of the plan sets present the some information. 3/11 /3 and 5/30/3: Repeat comment. Topic: Intersection Details Number: 161 Created: 3/13/2003 The midblock crossing shown on CS331 must be a minimum 12' wide. See 7.7.5 for depth requirements. Identify the transition length from outflow to inflow curb and gutter on the crosspans and label that it is to go to outflow C&G. Perhaps the better design would be to have Sternwheeler the through street without mid - block crosspans since the stop condition is at Clipper Way. 5/30/3: Please identify the transition length from outflow to inflow curb and gutter on the crosspans and label that it is to go to outflow C&G. Number: 162 Created: 3/13/2003 . Crown the transition in accordance with detail 7-28 from Clipper Way to Sternwheeler Drive. 5/30/3: See sheet CS331. Still have some problems with the elevations. Topic: Landscape Number: 74 Created: 11 /14/2002 The developer must provide any needed irrigation to the medians of the roundabout, and will be responsible for the maintenance of landscaping in these areas. This landscaping must also meet sight distance requirements (please add a note to the plans). 3/11 /3: Repeat comment. Please provide and show on the plans. 5/30/3: Repeat comment. Number: 75 Created: 11 /14/2002 Landscape medians include must Include drainage facilities to handle sprinkler runoff and nuisance flows. Refer to Appendix C. 3/11 /3: Repeat comment. Please show on plans. 5/30/3: Repeat comment. Number: 212 Created: 6/3/2003 See Appendix E6 for scanability requirements (min font size, overlapping labeling, etc). Topic: Plan and Profiles Number: 51 Created: 11 /12/2002 Page 2 ZAi STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort VIGNETTE STUDIOS Date: 6/9/2003 TERENCE HOAGLUND 144 N. MASON ST. #2 FT. COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for LIND PROPERTY PDP - TYPE I (LUC) AND FINAL COMPLIANCE #39-94B/C, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen Topic: Site Number: 250 Created: 6/9/2003 The applicant and mineral extraction company have agreed on a future location for an oil well. The location of this well is not included within this phase of the project, rather within phase II of the project, next to the designated neighborhood center. This future center will serve the overall Lind development. It is very likely the well location will prohibit the development of the neighborhood center, making the Lind project out of compliance with the LMN zone district development standards. The second phase of the Und PDP will need to include a minor amendment to the Lind ODP, showing the relocation of this neighborhood center, most likely northwest of the intersection of Bar Harbor and Brightwater Drives. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Details Number: 59 Created: 11 /12/2002 Update all the old details to the new. Provide these details and any other as required by the design: 16-2 710 1606 701 711 1607 702 713.1 F 1609L if required by Transportation Planning or - 703 713.2F 1611 706 803 1612 707 1601 1613 708 1602 1413 709 1603 3/11/3: Repeat comment. Still missing 711, 713.1F, 713.21', 1607, 1612, 1613, 1413, 7-26 and CDOT m-609-1 curb and gutter type 2. Also, remove 1604 - it's not correct. Provide the Greeley standard for stamped concrete at access ramps (until the LCUASS detail is updated) and the CDOT standard for truncated dome access ramps for design and construction. See attached. 5/30/3: Please provide detail 1607 and remove the duplicate 16-2. Topic: Easements Number: 46 Created: 11 /12/2002 The plat needs to include the detention pond or provide all offsite easements (off -site grading and construction) that occur outside the platted boundary. Off -site grading and construction easements are required for any work occurring on neighboring properties. The plans currently show off -site construction occurring on all sides. 3/11/3: Repeat comment. There is off -site grading and construction occurring outside of the platted boundary. Please extend the platted boundary limits or provide all necessary off -site easements. 5/30/3: Repeat comment. Page 1