HomeMy WebLinkAboutLINCOLN EAST CONVENIENCE CENTER PUD, LOT 1 - FINAL - 40-94E - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSComments continued from the previous page...
b. FULL CROSS -SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM OF EVERY 50 FEET SHOWING THE
ROW LINES, CENTERLINE, FLOWLINE, STATIONING, ELEVATIONS,
SIDEWALKS, PARKWAYS, CROSS -SLOPES, CURB & GUTTER, MEDIANS, ETC.
C. ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCES, ADEQUATE STOPPING DISTANCES, RADII OF
CURVES, ADEQUATE LONGITUDINAL SLOPES, ADEQUATE VERTICAL
CURVES, TAPER LENGTHS, RIGHT -TURN LANES, ETC.
YOU WILL NEED TO INCORPORATE THE DESIGN CURRENTLY BE PERFORMED BY THE
SEAR -BROWN GROUP (ROB HUME) FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT TO THE
SOUTH AND/OR TAKE THE INITIATIVE TO DESIGN THE PORTION OF LINCOLN-AVENUE
ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THE DIAMOND SHAMROCK PROPERTY AS WELL AS 1000 FEET
NORTH AND SOUTH OF THIS PROJECT. WE WILL NEED TO SEE THE PROPOSED SOUTH
FLOWLINE ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE TO COMPARE IT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE NORTH
FLOWLINE. THE SAME REQUIREMENTS THAT WERE STATED ABOVE FOR THE DESIGN OF
LEMAY AVENUE APPLY TO THE DESIGN OF LINCOLN AVENUE AS WELL.
THE PRIVATE ACCESS, MEDIAN, AND TAPER ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE WILL NEED TO BE
REDESIGNED SO THAT A TANKER TRUCK WILL BE ABLE TO ENTER THE SITE. CURRENTLY
THIS CANNOT HAPPEN EFFECTIVELY.
• THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS NOTIFIED YOU OF THESE
REQUIREMENTS AND THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. THIS IS A REQUIREMENT THAT
NEEDS TO BE ACCOMMODATED BEFORE THIS PROJECT CAN PROCEED TO THE PLANNING
AND ZONING BOARD. THEREFORE, WE ARE ASKING YOU TO NOT RESUBMIT YOUR UTILITY
PLANS UNTIL YOU HAVE ADDRESSED, THESE ISSUES.
OTHER COMMENTS:
• You.wili need to redesign the vertical curves along the north flowline of Lincoln Avenue. Currently
they do not meet the minimum requirements for an arterial street, per City standards.
• Provide "k" values for all of the vertical curves.
• Show a typical cross-section of both Lincoln Avenue and Lemay Avenue.
• See sheet number 4 for additional comments and concerns.
• We will need to see the proposed south flowline of Lincoln Avenue, not the edge of asphalt. You can
label it by saying that it will be constructed by others, however, we need to know that the north
flowline is placed in the correct location with respect to the south flowline.
Sheet 5 of 10: Lincoln Avenue Profiles and Cross -sections
Label all grade breaks with stations and elevations.
See sheet number 5 for additional comments and concerns.
DATE: September 25, 1997 DEPT: Engineering,
PROJECT: #40-94E Lincoln East Convenience Center
P.U.D. - (LDGS).Final
PLANNER:. Mike Ludwig
All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, Octoberf,1997
15, -
MAJORISSUES
YOU WILL NEED TO INCORPORATE THE DESIGN CURRENTLY BEING PERFORMED BY THE
SEAR -BROWN GROUP (ROB HUME) FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT TO THE
SOUTH AND/OR TAKE THE INITIATIVE TO DESIGN THE PORTION OF LEMAY AVENUE ALONG
THE FRONTAGE OF THE DIAMOND SHAMROCK PROPERTY AS WELL AS 1000 FEET NORTH
AND SOUTH OF THIS PROJECT. REFER TO THE DESIGN CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA,
STANDARDS. AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREETS, SIDEWALKS, ALLEYS AND OTHER
PUBLIC WAYS MANUAL. THIS DESIGN SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE
FOLLOWING:
a. PLAN AND PROFILES FOR THE WEST FLOWLINE, EAST FLOWLINE, AND
CENTERLINE.
Comments continued on next page lar
Date: io
CHECI; HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
n Pkt x Sh _ Dlai * Report L Od a
x Utility x Rd= Utley ,c Lands* To AW
co,rtina.i7�
11. Please check the capacity of the inlet and storm sewer draining basin OS-3.
RESPONSE:
Please refer to the redlined plans and report for additional review comments.
3. The trench drains from the car wash should not drain to the storm sewer. The drainage
from the car wash should drain to the sanitary sewer.
RESPONSE:
4. Off -site grading easements may be necessary for the proposed grading on the north and
east sides of the site. Also, a grading easement is needed for the proposed grading of the
ditch at the southeast corner of the site unless the ditch is within the right-of-way.
RESPONSE:
5. Please show property lines, existing easements and R.O.W.'s on the drainage plan.
RESPONSE:
6. It appears that the east half of the access road from Lincoln will not be detained. Please
adjust grading to allow this area to be detained.
RESPONSE:
7. Please calculate the 1007year hydraulic grade line for the proposed storm sewer under
Lincoln. Please show the HGL on the profile. Will the HGL in the pipe effect the
operation of the detention pond.
RESPONSE:
8. Please note that Diamond Shamrock will be responsible for constructing the outfall to
the existing channel, if the San Cristo outfall is not yet constructed.
RESPONSE:
9. The north half of the north access road is shown to drain off -site. Please direct this
drainage to the detention pond.
RESPONSE:
10. Please verify the profile of the San Cristo outfall storm sewer with the approved San
Cristo plans. The proposed profiles should match the profile shown on the approved
plans.
RESPONSE:
REVISION SEP 26 B97
COMMENT S HEE'
DATE:. September 25; 1997 DEPT: Stormwater
PROJECT: #40-94E Lincoln East Convenience Center
P.U.D. - (LDGS) Final
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig .
All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, October 8,1997
1. City regulations specify no critical facilities, including gas stations, are allowed in the
500-year floodplain. A variance from this criteria is needed and must be approved by the
Water Utilities Board. Please contact Marsha Hilmes-Floodplain Administrator regarding
the variance request. This comment was made previously but was not addressed.
RESPONSE:
I Please verify that the future upstream portion of the storm sewer under Lemay will be
able to tie in with the proposed storm sewer profile and alignment. A profile of the future
upstream portion of the storm sewer is needed to verify the proposed profile and
alignment.
RESPONSE:
Date:
C -r,,. R/9 n -rofd
Mj )To Iuclui5
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONSRpI
�i City of Fort Collins
Uh1itY
y
DATE: September 25, 1997 DEPT: Mapping
PROJECT: #40-94E Lincoln East Convenience Center
P.U.D. - (LDGS) Final
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig
All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, October 8,1997
N 4.w� � �. `�� e. ` j i �" � e i 5 C� i �e re +ti � � ro vv. v� y +-+1 e � '•�.
Z. �y�f7B5ea] 30, Ji�q. c'asehe�� ort %1�iS 1PIq-1 .: �oe5 06+
111a�o� 1;%4L [duioSed
-460,,J6 7(46-
roc- WaC'ePTzo,./ ILIC'S of -r64CY rjFFs1rr:r- &14SL3'1-1e-ti--j
�. %/-fcrr WI?OJ4 S2Ccrloa /S C4 6e-L-0 vcll L�6,q-4,.
Date:
Signatllie: C LuSCT v
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ PId _ Sk _ Dna * Report -Oda
_ UWAy _ Rcd]z Ugly _Lands* City of Fort Collins
DATE: October 13, 1997 DEPT: Water/Wastewater ,
PROJECT: #40-94E Lincoln East Convenience Center
PUD - Final(LDGS)
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig
All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, October 13, 1997 .
-Provide detail for Concrete joint encasement.
-Label all fittings,, valves and define methods of deflections.
Maintain 10' separation between sanitary sewer service and fuel tanks.
-Show and label sanitary sewer main/manhole in Lincoln Ave.
improvement plan view. Include note to adjust existing manhole to
finish grade.
-Provide detail of water main lowering detail.
-See overall utility and landscape plans for other comments.
Date: )( 7%i' le-37 Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
X Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _Other
X Utility X Redline Utility X Landscape
City of Fort Collins
Tree "Potection Specifications. The followinE to protection specifications lI
shou._. followed to the maximum extent v ')le for all projects with
protecteu existing trees.
(1) Within the drip line of any protected existing tree, there shall be no
cut or fill over a four inch (4") depth unless a qualified arborist or
forester has evaluated and approved the disturbance.
(2) All protected existing trees shall be pruned to the City of Fort Collins .
Forestry standards.
(3) Prior to and during construction, barriers shall be erected around all
protected existing trees with such barriers to be of orange fencing a
minimum of 4' height, secured with metal t-posts, no closer than six
(6) feet from the trunk or one-half (%2) of the drip line, whichever is
greater. There shall be no storage or movement of equipment,
material, debris, or fill within the fenced tree protection zone.
(4) During the construction stage of development, the applicant shall
prevent the cleaning of equipment or material or the storage and
disposal of waste material such as paints, oils, solvents, asphalt,
concrete, motor oil or any othermaterial harmful to the life of a tree
within the drip line of any protected tree or group of trees.
(5) No damaging attachment, wires, signs, or permits maybe fastened to
any protected tree.
(6) Large property areas containing protected trees and separated from
construction or land clearing areas, road rights -of -way and utility
easements may be "ribboned off," rather than erecting protective
fencing around each tree as required in subsection (G)(3) above. This
may be accomplished by placing metal t-post stakes a maximum of
fifty (50) feet apart and tying ribbon or rope from stake -to -stake along
the outside perimeters of such areas being cleared.
(7) The installation of utilities, irrigation lines, or any underground
fixture requiring excavation deeper than six inches shall be
accomplished by boring under the root system of protected existing
trees at a minimum depth of 24 inches. The auger distance is .
established from the face of the tree (outer bark) and is scaled from
tree diameter at breast height as described in the chart below.
Tree Diameter at Breast Height (inches)
Auger Distance From Face of Tree
(feet)
0-2
1
3-
2
5-9
5
10-14
10
15-19
12
Over 19
15
AA
TREE PRESERVATION WORKSHOP HortScience, Inc.
ASCA, Rocky Mountain Chapter ISA June 22, 1995
Table II-1: Guidelines for adequate tree preservation zones for trees. Distances should
be increased for trees of poor vigor.
s
Q
SPECIES
°
v
fi •.
TOLERANCE TO
IMPACTS
S
r
Good
�
n
j
J
f
�u
2
III
TREE AGE
Young
<I/4 life expectancy
Mature
114-314 life expectancy
Overmature
>314 life expectancy
Moderate Young
Mature .
Overmature
Poor Young
Mature
Overmature
y- e ,,,, �A I e• -
LL
Page II - 8
DISTANCE FROM TRUNK
feettin. trunk diameter
0.5'
0.75'
1.0'
0.75'
1.0'
1.25'
1.0'
1.25'
1.5'
4?c.z
:2 Y
S
7. Comments and relined plans from the Mapping Department are attached. Please
return redlined plans to Mike Ludwig at Current Planning with plan revisions.
Please contact me at 221-6206 for the number of folded revisions required for each
document prior to the submittal of plan revisions or if you have any questions or concerns
related to these comments.
Sincerely,
Michael Ludwig, AICP
City Planner
xc: Tim Blandford, Engineering
Stormwater Utility
file/Project Planner
diameter required for tree preservation zones and tree protection
specifications. Please provide the existing ground elevation at the base of
the trees to be preserved on the Site Plan and Utility (grading) plans to
facilitate staff review.
e. Please make sure that the lighting reveal under the edge of the canopy is
painted, not illuminated.
f. Please return all redlined plan sets with plan revisions.
2. Public Service Company offered the following comments:
a. The easement along Lemay Avenue needs to be shown as 15 feet on the
plat.
b. The majority of the proposed gas mains and / or services will be located in
asphalt areas, since this is where most of the easements are located.
C. There are potential conflicts with trees in easements along E. Lincoln and the
proposed gas main.
3. The Zoning Department offers the following comments:
a. Please add a general note to the Site Plan that all exterior building lighting
will be down -directional, sharp -cut off, high pressure sodium luminaries.
b. Please show a curb ramp for the handicap parking space.
c. Please clarify the building envelope. Label and dimension the building
envelope and the distance from, the building envelope to the property line.
Please dimension the buildings and canopies on the site plan, not in the
schedule.
d. The property.is located within the neighborhood sign district. Please remove
all signs from the plans and show sign blocks for all wall mounted signs on
the elevations.
4. Comments and redlined plans from the Engineering Department are attached.
Please return redlined plans to Mike Ludwig at Current Planning with plan revisions.
5. Comments and redlined plans/reports from the Stormwater Utility are attached.
Please return redlined plans/reports to Mike Ludwig at Current Planning with plan
revisions.
6. Comments and redlined plans from the Water and Wastewater Utility are
attached. Please return redlined plans to Mike Ludwig at Current Planning with plan
revisions.
Commui. Planning and Environmental ., iices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
October 30, 1997
Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing
c/o Carl Schmidtlein
Galloway, Romero & Associates
5350 DTC Parkway
Englewood, CO 80111
Dear Carl,
Staff has reviewed your revisions for the Lincoln East PUD, First Filing (Diamond
Shamrock) Final that were submitted on September 25, 1997, and would like to offer the
following comments:
The Current Planning Department offers the following comments:
a. As previously discussed on the phone and in various meetings,. the review
of the Lincoln East PUD revisions has been on hold, pending the resolution .
of an agreement between Diamond Shamrock and adjacent property owners
for the design of arterial street improvements. It is the Current Planning
Department's understanding that an agreement has been reached and the
design for the arterial street improvements for Lemay Avenue and Lincoln
Avenue will be submitted in approximately 4 to 5 weeks. Staff is forwarding
comments which are based upon the September 25, 1997 submittal only.
Additional comments may, be forthcoming once the arterial street
improvement plans have been reviewed. Additional revisions to the
Diamond Shamrock proposal may be necessary. No further review of any
additional plan revision submittal(s) will occur until the arterial street
improvement plans have been submitted and reviewed. A Planning and
Zoning Board hearing will not be scheduled until all comments are
addressed.
b. The proposed bike rack locations and ice machine impede pedestrian
circulation. Please relocate.
C. Please designate the specific color of the plastic inserts on the trash.
enclosure gates.
d. The Landscape -Plan indicates that tree rings will be provided to preserve the
existing grade at the base of a couple of existing trees. Please see the
attached. information from the City Forester concerning the minimum
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
take this application to the Planning and Zoning Board for their review on May 21,
1998.. Based on the information currently in our files, staff will be recommending that
the Board deny this application. Any further application on this property will be
required to apply under the City's Land Use Code.
If you have been actively pursuing this submittal, please contact me. In order to keep
this project active, documentation of your efforts since you received the City's comment
letter will be needed. Likewise, should you have any questions regarding this
notification, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Robert E. Blanchard
Current Planning Director
cc: Mike Ludwig, City Planner
doonnae tle"ImAr
a
Commu. f Planning and Environmental, vices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
Webster Associates
60 E. Service Road 1-25
Cheyenne, Wyo 82007
Dear Mr. Webster:
March 25, 1998
On January 8, 1997, the -City Council enacted Ordinance 161, 1996, commonly called
the Transition Ordinance. This Ordinance provided for the review and processing of
land use. applications under the regulations in effect at that time (Land Development
Guidance System, subdivision regulations, special site plan review) during the
transition period until the adoption of the Land Use Code and established a temporary
delay in the acceptance of new applications.
Ordinance 161, 1996 established two deadlines for the acceptance of applications that
would continue to be reviewed under the LDGS:
1. January 18, 1997. After the effective date of Ordinance 161, 19969
(January 18, 1997) only specifically exempted applications would be
permitted. Until that deadline, applicants could submit either preliminary
or final development applications and have them reviewed under the
regulations in..effect at that time (Section 6, Ordinance 161, 1996); and,
2. July 17, 1997. As of July 17, 1997 or six months after the date of
approval (whichever was later), all preliminary subdivision plats and
PUDs would expire unless a completed application for final approval had
been filed.
In addition, the Ordinance allowed for the continued processing of applications already
in the process.
The clear intent of this Ordinance was to provide a reasonable transition time in which
valid development projects could continue to be processed under prior regulations
rather than being reviewed under newly adopted regulations.
Our records indicate that you submitted a Final PUD application on April 29, 1997 for
the Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, 1 st Filing. City staff reviewed the submittal
and provided initial comments on June 4, 1998. Since that time, revisions have not
been submitted to indicate this is an active project. Because of this lack of activity and
any other clear indication that you are actively pursuing this project, staff intends to
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
Apr-23-98 09:07A P_02
M - --fr
It is Mr. Schrader's full intention to meet with Mr. Summers during the week of April 27"h to discuss the
remaining planning issues and reach a solution.
Given the information contained in the letter submitted to you on April 2, 1998 by Mr. Hauser and the timeline
presented here,l respectfully request that this matter not be referred to the May 21, 1998 Planning and Zoning
board for denial and, instead, that we be allowed to continue the review process under the approved preliminary
P. U.D.. should you have further questions regarding this projector if I can provide any additional needed
information, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,, ( p
PCS6- s r 4"-J6�C!
Donald Shields Jr.
Project Manager
Wickham Gustafson, Architects
CC". Larry Stroud; Miscio & Stroud
Mike Ludwig; staff Planner
Jerry Summeers; Summers Auto Repair
Steve Schrader; Schrader Oil Co.
Alan Hauser, Architecture One, P.C.
Apr-23-98 09:07A
P-01
WICK. HA
/ GUS ARSON
LAWRENCE A. WICKHAM
ROBERT J. GUSTAFSON
DONALD G. SHIELDS
A R C H I T E C T S
1730 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SUITE 202 (970) 493-2025
FORT COLLINS. COLORADO 80525 FAX (970) 493-2026
April 22, 1999
Mr. Bob Blanchard
Current Planning Director
City of Fort Collins
281 N. College Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80522
RE: Final P.U.D. Application: Schrader's Country Store, Lot 1, Lincoln East Convenience Center
P.U.D., a Filing
Dear Mr. Blanchard:
In regards to your letter dated March 20, 1999 and a letter you received from Alan Hauser of Architecture One
dated April 2, 1998, I would like to further petition that you allow the continuation of the submittal and review
process relative to this P.U.D.. Mr. Schrader has been diligent in pursuing this development since acquiring the
property on March 5, 1998. In addition to the information stated in Mr. Hauser's letter, I would offer the
following time line as evidence of our diligence.
November 26, 1997 The Websters offer to buy the diamond Shamrock plans from Galloway Romero.
December 1, 1997 Diamond Shamrock rejects the offer from the Websters.
January 13, 1998 A contract was presented to the Schraders by the Websters.
February 5 The Websters presented a counter -proposal to the Schraders.
February 25 The Schraders present a new contract to the Websters.
March 5 The Websters sign a contract with the Schraders.
March 18 The Schraders meet with Mr. Jerry Summers to discuss joint planning to proceed with
the P.U.D.
March 21 - April 21 Mr. Summers was out of the country and could not be consulted on further planning
issues.
April 21 - April 28 Mr. Schrader is out of town.
Commui. Planning and Environmentalvices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
Donald Schields Jr.
Wickham Gustafson Architects
1730 South College Ave
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Dear Don:
May 12, 1998
On March 20, 1998 you were sent a letter requesting documentation that you
were actively pursuing the Lincoln East Convenience Center, Lot 1, Schraders
Country Store. I have reviewed your response with other development review
staff and determined that there has not been sufficient activity related to this
project. Therefore, we will be taking this project to the Planning and Zoning
Board with a recommendation of denial.
Note that the Board meeting is scheduled for June 4, 1998, not May 21, 1998 as
indicated in the original letter. Should you desire, you will have the opportunity to
address the Board to explain the status of this project. As with any Planning and
Zoning Board decision, you have the ability to appeal their decision to the City
Council.
Should you have any questions regarding this process, please contact me at
(970)221-6750.
Sincerely,
71A731"J")
Robert E. Blanchard
Current Planning Director
cc: Mike Ludwig
d0cMgebldld982Jtr
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
SCHEDULE
Qrs—Yidn�luas eawv ewn.,l
®„av�ar
Qi rw.c,W,• iv
e4v mean e.a u u l.Y a u,
IN
LOT 3
I
I
I
I
L_
FRIEuM ►WARY PUD L` OL)-r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
sr m .oau��.a.mtd7.'a
va�f°v-ni,n.l,r0 �'. m�i ut�E,F
®y,ve rym• v. wyen,.r uuanv
®LaJf v. aavu, uu..HI ,m v. Yn 1_n
ew.a.�,I<m,4B.a
„®m® Pri
®'mrY s,m'm. aoau,uw.v. nnY lmn
0°®aka —an„ �M vvYr
mares
®u rtw 1.,r.%iY o.roir. r-r eawum
rupm ami¢v—av
0 a�—ew �'Y aa„a a>-Yrs—emr.
®famu.0 n p. Nr1
Y4
RAISED CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION
NOTES:
®mnma
.0
s s ov"im°:.ww M mr •7wi sr.�`.n
vm,
LAND USE TABLE:
m�.r.
all
ur ...
--A
. ,.
mi.°.'Rrw
anv.mi— -
Wv uwr
a
p�jp.Cnn
A.YPT DETAIL °OEM
ATTORNEYS TIFlCATIONt
o-
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
CERTIMCATION:
m
.... M TRASH ENCLOSURE
OWNER'S CERTIFlCATION:
MC CINI` MAP 4
Diamond Shamrock
SITE PLAN SHEET 1 of 5
I
OUT
I
I
W
Z
W
Q
W
J
O
Z
• ■ rA
C"
O T
Link-N-Greene •
Golf Course
C
CCR
VICINITY MAP
#40-94E N
Lincoln East Convenience Center, LOT 1
Final ILDGSI 1r•=300•
-___
H i11im
%h K1
Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E
June 4, 1998 P&Z Meeting
Page 5
4. Transportation:
The proposed traffic volumes generated are acceptable and were accounted for in the
traffic study that was approved with the Lincoln East PUD Overall Development Plan. The
proposed use on Lot 2 will generate approximately 1,570 average daily vehicle trips.
Parking ratios are acceptable for the proposed use.
5. Utility Plans:
Comments from the Engineering Department, Stormwater Utility, Water and Wastewater
Utility and Mapping Department were attached to the October 30, 1997 comment letter.
These comments specifically requested revisions to the plans for arterial street
improvements, revisions to the water utility drawings, additional information needed on the
Plat, the need for off -site easements, and the need for a variance from the Water Utilities
Board to locate a critical facility in the 500-year floodplain. Without revisions addressing
each of these comments, compliance with Engineering Criteria A-3.2 Design Standards
cannot be determined.
6. Status of Submittal:
In the April 22, 1998 response letter, the applicant outlines the process by which
Schrader's Country Store replaced Diamond Shamrock as the developer of the proposed
PUD. The Director of Planning determined that site acquisition did not constitute activity
as no further resolution of the development review issues has occurred.
FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSION:
1. The Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E complies with the
uses designated on Parcel A of the Lincoln East PUD Overall Development Plan.
2. The Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E cannot be
considered in substantial compliance with the approved Lincoln East Convenience
Center PUD, Preliminary, #40-94D.
3. The Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E does not meet
all applicable All -Development Criteria of the LDGS, specifically Neighborhood
Compatibility Criteria A-2.3 Architecture, A-2.6 Pedestrian Circulation, A-2.13
Landscaping and Engineering Criteria A-3.2 Design Standards.
RECOMMENDATION:
Denial of the Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E.
Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E
June 4, 1998 P&Z Meeting
Page 4
Staff requested in the October 30, 1997 comment letter, that the proposed bike racks and
ice machine be relocated so as not to impede pedestrian circulation. Without revisions
addressing these comments, compliance with All Development Criteria A-2.6 Pedestrian
Circulation cannot be determined.
Architecture:
The convenience store will have a pitched roof with a maximum height of approximately
23 feet. The convenience store will be constructed of a grey -tone, fluted block with light -
grey tone rockface block accents at the corners. Synthetic white stucco will be used for
an accent band below the roof line. The roof will be constructed with a dark gray standing
seam metal.
The automated car wash building will also have a pitched roof with a maximum height of
approximately 23 feet. Building materials and colors will be identical to the convenience
store.
The fuel dispenser island canopy is split into two sections. The section on the north side
of the building measures 40' x 50 feet. The section on the south side of the building also
measures 40' x 50 feet but includes the potential for a 27' x 50 expansion for the potential
future addition of 2 more fuel pumps. Both sections of the canopy will have a maximum
height of approximately 20 feet and be constructed of a dark gray metal canopy facia to
match the roof of the convenience store. Canopy lighting will be fully recessed. The
support columns will be wrapped with light gray rock face block and synthetic stucco.
Staff requested, in the October 30, 1997 comment letter, additional details for the trash
enclosure. Without revisions addressing these comments, compliance with All
Development Criteria A-2.3 Architecture cannot be determined.
Landscaping:
The landscape plan consists of deciduous street trees, ornamental and evergreen trees,
and deciduous and evergreen shrubs around the perimeter of the site. Raised, patterned,
pedestrian crossings are provided in various locations to mitigate pedestrian/vehicle
conflicts. Picnic tables are provided in a significant landscaped area at the corner of
Lemay and Lincoln Avenues.
Staff requested, in the October 30, 1997 comment letter, additional documentation
regarding the preservation of existing trees on the site. Without revisions addressing these
comments, compliance with All Development Criteria A-2.13 Landscaping cannot be
determined.
Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E
June 4, 1998 P&Z Meeting
Page 3
PUD only covered Parcels A and B of the Lincoln East Overall Development Plan. All
other portions of the ODP expired on March 28, 1997 pursuant to Ordinance No. 161,
1996. If this Final PUD application is denied, the Preliminary PUD approval on Lot 1 and
the ODP approval on Parcel A will expire pursuant to Ordinance No. 161, 1996.
2. Land Use:
This is a Final PUD request for a 2,880 square foot gas station / convenience store and car
wash on approximately 1.413 acres known as Lot 1 of the Lincoln East Convenience
Center PUD. The property is zoned I, Industrial.
A. Overall Development Plan
The request is consistent with the uses designated for Parcel A of the Lincoln East PUD
Overall Development Plan.
B. Preliminary PUD
On March 24, 1997 the Planning and Zoning Board approved the Lincoln East
Convenience Center PUD, Preliminary, #40-94D by a vote of 5-0. Lot 1 was granted
Preliminary PUD approval for a 2,880 square foot gas station / convenience store and car
wash. However, substantial compliance with the approved Preliminary cannot be
determined until issues related to the All -Development Criteria are addressed.
C. All -Development Criteria
This Final PUD request does not meet all applicable All -Development Criteria of the Land
Development Guidance System. See comments below under layout, architecture,
landscaping, and utility plans.
3. Design:
Layout:
This request proposes a layout which places the 1808 square foot convenience store at
the center of the Lot 1 with a split canopy for two pumps on each side of the store. A car -
wash is located along the northern edge of Lot 1. Access to Lot 1 is gained via two
proposed internal private drives; one from Lemay Avenue, the other from Lincoln Avenue.
These private drives will also serve remaining undeveloped parcels. Raised, patterned
concrete walkways mitigate points of pedestrian/vehicle conflict.
Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E
June 4, 1998 P&Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS
Background:
On January 8, 1997, the City Council enacted Ordinance 161, 1996, commonly called the
Transition Ordinance. This Ordinance provided for the review and processing of land use
applications under the regulations in effect at that time (Land Development Guidance
System, subdivision regulations, special site plan review) during the transition period until
the adoption of the Land Use Code and established a temporary delay in the acceptance
of new applications.
The clear intent of this Ordinance was to provide a reasonable transition time in which valid
development projects could continue to be processed under prior regulations rather than
being reviewed under newly adopted regulations.
On March 20, 1998, letters were sent to all inactive PUDs that were in the development
review process noting that there had been no activity on these projects since staff
comments on the most recent submittal had been mailed (attached). In this instance,
inactivity was defined as not submitting revised plans in response to the City's revision
comment letter.
The applicant responded to the March 20, 1998 with a letter documenting activity related
to the development application. After reviewing the applicant's documentation, the Director
of Current Planning determined that there had not been sufficient activity related to the
project. The applicant was notified on May 12, 1998 that the staff is presenting this project
to the Board for review based on the information provided in the initial submittal.
The surrounding zoning and land uses on the CityPlan zoning map are as follows
N: OUT & RL; an undeveloped, unincorporated parcel and undeveloped Fort Collins
Business Center land; San Cristo Subdivision.
S: C; vacant/undeveloped (proposed Mulberry Lemay Crossing ODP).
E: I & OUT; undeveloped remainder of Lincoln East ODP; undeveloped Fort
Collins Business Center.
W: 1; North Lemay (industrial) Subdivision, Second Filing (partially
developed).
This subject property was annexed into the City as part of the East Lincoln Third
Annexation and Zoning on December 6, 1994.
On October 28, 1996 the Planning and Zoning Board approved the Lincoln East PUD
Overall Development Plan by a vote of 6-0. The Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD,
Preliminary, #40-94D was approved on March 24, 1997 by a vote of 5-0. The Preliminary
ITEM NO. 10
MEETING DATE 6/4/98
STAFF Mike Ludwig/Bob 131i
Citv of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Lincoln East Convenience Center PUD, Lot 1, Final, #40-94E.
APPLICANT: Don Shields Jr.
Wickham Gustafson Architects
1730 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80525
OWNER: Webster Associates
60 East Service Road 1-25
Cheyenne, WY 82007
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a Final PUD request for a 2,880 square foot gas station / convenience store and car
wash on approximately 1.413 acres known as Lot 1 of the Lincoln East Convenience
Center PUD. The property is zoned I, Industrial.
RECOMMENDATION: Denial.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This project has been inactive since staff comments on the revision submittal were sent
on October 30, 1997. Because of this inactivity and any other indication that the applicant
is actively pursuing the project, the Planning and Zoning Board is being asked to review
this project based on the information currently available.
This request for Final P.U.D. approval:
complies with the uses designated on Parcel A of the Lincoln East PUD Overall
Development Plan;
• cannot be considered in substantial compliance with the approved Lincoln East
Convenience Center PUD, Preliminary, #40-94D.
• does not meet all applicable All -Development Criteria of the LDGS, specifically
Neighborhood Compatibility Criteria A-2.3 Architecture, A-2.6 Pedestrian
Circulation, A-2.13 Landscaping and Engineering Criteria A-3.2 Design Standards.
and
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281N.College Ave- P.O. Box580 Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 (970)221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT