HomeMy WebLinkAboutLINCOLN EAST CONVENIENCE CENTER PUD, LOT 1 - FINAL - 40-94E - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSComments continued from the previous page...
b. FULL CROSS -SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM OF EVERY 50 FEET SHOWING THE
ROW LINES, CENTERLINE, FLOWLINE, STATIONING, ELEVATIONS,
SIDEWALKS, PARKWAYS, CROSS -SLOPES, CURB & GUTTER, MEDIANS, ETC.
C. ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCES, ADEQUATE STOPPING DISTANCES, RADII OF
CURVES, ADEQUATE LONGITUDINAL SLOPES, ADEQUATE VERTICAL
CURVES, TAPER LENGTHS, RIGHT -TURN LANES, ETC.
• YOU WILL NEED TO INCORPORATE THE DESIGN CURRENTLY BE PERFORMED BY THE
SEAR -BROWN GROUP (ROB HUME) FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT TO THE
SOUTH AND/OR TAKE THE INITIATIVE TO DESIGN THE PORTION OF LINCOLN AVENUE
ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THE DIAMOND SHAMROCK PROPERTY AS WELL AS 1000 FEET
NORTH AND SOUTH OF THIS PROJECT. WE WILL NEED TO SEE THE PROPOSED SOUTH
FLOWLINE ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE TO COMPARE IT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE NORTH
FLOWLINE. THE SAME REQUIREMENTS THAT WERE STATED ABOVE FOR THE DESIGN OF
LEMAY AVENUE APPLY TO THE DESIGN OF LINCOLN AVENUE AS WELL.
• THE PRIVATE ACCESS, MEDIAN, AND TAPER ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE WILL NEED TO BE
REDESIGNED SO THAT A TANKER TRUCK WILL BE ABLE TO ENTER THE SITE. CURRENTLY
THIS CANNOT HAPPEN EFFECTIVELY.
• THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS NOTIFIED YOU OF THESE
REQUIREMENTS AND THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. THIS IS A REQUIREMENT THAT
NEEDS TO BE ACCOMMODATED BEFORE THIS PROJECT CAN PROCEED TO THE PLANNING
AND ZONING BOARD. THEREFORE, WE ARE ASKING YOU TO NOT RESUBMIT YOUR UTILITY
PLANS UNTIL YOU HAVE ADDRESSED THESE ISSUES.
OTHER COMMENTS:
• You will need to redesign the vertical curves along the north flowline of Lincoln Avenue. Currently
they do not meet the minimum requirements for an arterial street, per City standards.
• Provide "k" values for all of the vertical curves.
• Show a typical cross-section of both Lincoln Avenue and Lemay Avenue.
• See sheet number 4 for additional comments and concerns.
• We will need to see the proposed south flowline of Lincoln Avenue, not the edge of asphalt. You can
label it by saying that it will be constructed by others, however, we need to know that the north
flowline is placed in the correct location with respect to the south flowline.
Sheet 5 of 10: Lincoln Avenue Profiles and Cross -sections
• Label all grade breaks with stations and elevations.
• See sheet number 5 for additional comments and concerns.
p
REVISION
. .. COMMENT SHEET
DATE: September 25, 1997 DEPT: Engineering
PROJECT: #40-94E Lincoln East Convenience Center
P.U.D. - (LDGS) Final
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig
All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, Octoberf,1997
Is,
MAJORISSUES
YOU WILL NEED TO INCORPORATE THE DESIGN CURRENTLY BEING PERFORMED BY THE
SEAR -BROWN GROUP (ROB HUME) FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT TO THE
SOUTH AND/OR TAKE THE INITIATIVE TO DESIGN THE PORTION OF LEMAY AVENUE ALONG
THE FRONTAGE OF THE DIAMOND SHAMROCK PROPERTY AS WELL AS 1000 FEET NORTH
AND SOUTH OF THIS PROJECT. REFER TO THE DESIGN CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA,
STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREETS, SIDEWALKS, ALLEYS AND OTHER
PUBLIC WAYS MANUAL. THIS DESIGN SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE
FOLLOWING:
a. PLAN AND PROFILES FOR THE WEST FLOWLINE, EAST FLOWLINE, AND
CENTERLINE.
Comments continued on next page wr
Date: io
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
x Plat x Sibe _ Drainage Report x Od w
* Ugly )c Redline U4 r, Lan&* 1Z A", City of Fort Collins
coatnt;mT
3. The trench drains from the car wash should not drain to the storm sewer. The drainage
from the car wash should drain to the sanitary sewer.
RESPONSE:
4. Off -site grading easements may be necessary for the proposed grading on the north and
east sides of the site. Also, a grading easement is needed for the proposed grading of the
ditch at the southeast corner of the site unless the ditch is within the right-of-way.
RESPONSE:
5. Please show property lines, existing easements and R.O.W.'s on the drainage plan.
RESPONSE:
6. It appears that the east half of the access road from Lincoln will not be detained. Please
adjust grading to allow this area to be detained.
RESPONSE:
7. Please calculate the 100-year hydraulic grade line for the proposed storm sewer under
Lincoln. Please show the HGL on the profile. Will the HGL in the pipe effect the
operation of the detention pond.
RESPONSE:
8. Please note that Diamond Shamrock will be responsible for constructing the outfall to
the existing channel, if the San Cristo outfall is not yet constructed.
RESPONSE:
9. The north half of the north access road is shown to drain off -site. Please direct this
drainage to the detention pond.
RESPONSE:
10. Please verify the profile of the San Cristo outfall storm sewer with the approved San
Cristo plans. The proposed profiles should match the profile shown on the approved
plans.
RESPONSE:
REVISION
SEP 2 6 1997
COMMENT S HEE
DATE: September 25, 1997 DEPT: Stormwater
PROJECT: #40-94E Lincoln East Convenience Center
P.U.D. - (LDGS) Final
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig
All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, October 8,1997
1. City regulations specify no critical facilities, including gas stations, are allowed in the
500-year floodplain. A variance from this criteria is needed and must be approved by the
Water Utilities Board. Please contact Marsha Hilmes-F000dplain Administrator regarding
the variance request. This comment was made previously but was not addressed.
RESPONSE:
2. Please verify that the future upstream portion of the storm sewer under Lemay will be
able to tie in with the proposed storm sewer profile and alignment. A profile of the future
upstream portion of the storm sewer is needed to verify the proposed profile and
alignment.
RESPONSE:
Date: Al)' /7 Signature:,:%5 z� �
-u. ?/ep, ' -0161
M� ITS �uC(ui y
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS �hati ,y,ro�
�cgs ufik City of Fort Collins
0
skb2c UM l zx z M M °Et' " @2
R5 REVISION
COMMENT SHEET
DATE: September 25, 1997 DEPT: Mapping
PROJECT: #40-94E Lincoln East Convenience Center
P.U.D. - (LDGS) Final
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig
All comments must be recieved no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, October 8,1997
c ao5c rl
Pp io-+...
Z. i Py�pasad
-so' NA -LA.
1 I
ca5ew,er-+ OA �iS Qlc.l doe5
hol_1
i- eo'5L �
�1 lA.
t G5e
1-4ou•5,:-,�
A�i�or; �y
II
si'1'�
`to
�¢. 1.�ur�'�. ..
Tf/672d !S A ,,/ EA orH
l��ysr Siva- of �-6 LaT .
tl T-lc- /�c3cc�PTzc.l /�c.s of T�fcs
lt4l ss wA .4 Go,v c; 7 46'
UFj'--S/TZ:v- EAS,�s-.L/cNTs
6, Tf-fcr WRo,uc, SL'crio,l /S ca Goa-iJ vvT //,/ Tf{er 66-6.4c-.
Date: Signature:
CM HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
_ Ed _ Site _ )Damage Report _ Odv
Utlltty _ Redline Wq _ Ian City of Fort Collins
. a�zx r � r�5m . •
]i k •
i.
DATE: October 13, 1997 DEPT: Water/Wastewater. .
PROJECT: #40-94E Lincoln East Convenience Center
PUD - Final(LDGS)
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig
All comments must be received no later than the staff review meeting:
Wednesday, October 13, 1997
-Provide detail for Concrete joint encasement.
-Label all fittings, valves and define methods of deflections.
-Maintain 10' separation between sanitary sewer service and fuel tanks.
-Show and label sanitary sewer main/manhole in Lincoln Ave.
improvement plan view. Include note to adjust existing manhole to
finish grade.
-Provide detail of water main lowering detail.
-See overall utility and landscape plans for other comments.
Date: l(7la' Signature:
CHECK HERE IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF REVISIONS
X Plat _ Site _ Drainage Report _Other
X Utility X Redline Utility X Landscape
City of Fort Collins
Tree 1-7�-otection Specifications. The followin a protection specifications
shoe. )e followed to the maximum extents ible for all projects with' .
protected existing trees.
(1) Within the drip line of any protected existing tree, there shall be no
cut or fill over a four inch (4") depth unless a qualified arborist or
forester has evaluated and approved the disturbance.
(2) All protected existing trees shall be pruned to the City of Fort Collins .
Forestry standards.
(3) Prior to and during construction, barriers shall be erected around all
protected existing trees with such barriers to be of orange fencing a
minimum of 4' height, secured with metal t-posts, no closer than six
(6) feet from the trunk or one-half (%) of the drip line, whichever is
greater. There shall be no storage or movement of equipment,
material, debris, or fill within the fenced tree protection zone.
(4) During the construction stage of development, the applicant shall
prevent the cleaning of equipment or material or the storage and
disposal of waste material such as paints, oils, solvents, asphalt,
concrete, motor oil or any other material harmful to the life of a tree
within the drip line of any protected tree or group of trees.
(5) No damaging attachment, wires, signs, or permits may be fastened to
any protected tree.
(6) Large property areas containing protected trees and separated from
construction or land clearing areas, road rights -of -way and utility
easements may be "ribboned off," rather than erecting protective
fencing around each tree as required in subsection (G)(3) above. This
may be accomplished by placing metal t-post stakes a maximum of
fifty (50) feet apart and tying ribbon or rope from stake -to -stake along
the outside perimeters of such areas being cleared.
(7) The installation of utilities, irrigation lines, or any underground
fixture requiring excavation deeper than six inches shall be
accomplished by boring under the root system of protected existing
trees at a minimum depth of 24 inches. The auger distance is
established from the face of the tree (outer bark) and is scaled from
tree diameter at breast height as described in the chart below.
Tree Diameter at Breast Height (inches)
Auger Distance From Face of Tree
(feet)
0-2
1
5-4
2
5-9
5
10-14
10
15-19
12
Over 19
15
`^QJ
s
-i;
v?
Q
Ill
u
Q
AA t -e
TREE PRESERVATION WORKSHOP
ASCA, Rocky Mountain Chapter ISA
HortScience, Inc.
June 22, 1995
Table II-1: Guidelines for adequate tree preservation zones for trees. Distances should
be increased for trees of poor vigor.
SPECIES TREE AGE DISTANCE FROM TRUNK
TOLERANCE TO feet/in. trunk diameter
IMPACTS
Good Young
<I/4 life expectancy
Mature
1/4 3/4 life expectancy
Overmature
>3/4life expectancy
Moderate
Young
Mature
Overmature
0.5'
0.75'
1.0'
0.75'
1.0'
1.25'
Poor Young 1.0'
Mature 1.25'
Overmature 1.5'
Page 11 - 8
7. Comments and relined plans from the Mapping Department are attached. Please
return redlined plans to Mike Ludwig at Current Planning with plan revisions.
Please contact me at 221-6206 for the number of folded revisions required for each
document prior to the submittal of plan revisions or if you have any questions or concerns
related to these comments.
Sincerely,
I 0000�0w-aa"
Michael Ludwig, AICP
City Planner
xc: Tim Blandford, Engineering
Stormwater Utility
file/Project Planner
r
�4
diameter required for tree preservation zones and tree protection
specifications. Please provide the existing ground elevation at the base of
the trees to be preserved on the Site Plan and Utility (grading) plans to
facilitate staff review.
e. Please make sure that the lighting reveal under the edge of the canopy is
painted, not illuminated.
f. Please return all redlined plan sets with plan revisions.
2. Public Service Company offered the following comments:
a. The easement along Lemay Avenue needs to be shown as 15 feet on the
plat.
b. The majority of the proposed gas mains and / or services will be located in
asphalt areas, since this is where most of the easements are located.
C. There are potential conflicts with trees in easements along E. Lincoln and the
proposed gas main.
3. The Zoning Department offers the following comments:
a. Please add a general note to the Site Plan that all exterior building lighting
will be down -directional, sharp -cut off, high pressure sodium luminaries.
b. Please show a curb ramp for the handicap parking space.
C. Please clarify the building envelope. Label and dimension the building
envelope and the distance from the building envelope to the property line.
Please dimension the buildings and canopies on the site plan, not in the
schedule.
d. The property.is located within the neighborhood sign district. Please remove
all signs from the plans and show sign blocks for all wall mounted signs on
the elevations.
4. Comments and redlined plans from the Engineering Department are attached.
Please return redlined plans to Mike Ludwig at Current Planning with plan revisions.
5. Comments and redlined plans/reports from the Stormwater Utility are attached.
Please return redlined plans/reports to Mike Ludwig at Current Planning with plan
revisions.
6. Comments and redlined plans from the Water and Wastewater Utility are
attached. Please return redlined plans to Mike Ludwig at Current Planning with plan
revisions.
Planning and Environmenta� _rvices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
October 30, 1997
Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing
c/o Carl Schmidtlein
Galloway, Romero & Associates
5350 DTC Parkway
Englewood, CO 80111
Dear Carl,
Staff has reviewed your revisions for the Lincoln East PUD, First Filing (Diamond
Shamrock) Final that were submitted on September 25, 1997, and would like to offer the
following comments:
1. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments:
a. As previously discussed on the phone and in various meetings, the review
of the Lincoln East PUD revisions has been on hold, pending the resolution
of an agreement between Diamond Shamrock and adjacent property owners
for the design of arterial street improvements. It is the Current Planning
Department's understanding that an agreement has been reached and the
design for the arterial street improvements for Lemay Avenue and Lincoln
Avenue will be submitted in approximately 4 to 5 weeks. Staff is forwarding
comments which are based upon the September 25, 1997 submittal only.
Additional comments may be forthcoming once the arterial street
improvement plans have been reviewed. Additional revisions to the
Diamond Shamrock proposal may be necessary. No further review of any
additional plan revision submittal(s) will occur until the arterial street
improvement plans have been submitted and reviewed. A Planning and
Zoning Board hearing will not be scheduled until all comments are
addressed.
b. The proposed bike rack locations and ice machine impede pedestrian
circulation. Please relocate.
C. Please designate the specific color of the plastic inserts on the trash
enclosure gates.
d. The Landscape Plan indicates that tree rings will be provided to presence the
existing grade at the base of a couple of existing trees. Please see the
attached information from the City Forester concerning the minimum
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020