The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHORSETOOTH EAST BUSINESS PARK, FILING 2, PAD D - MODIFICATION OF STANDARD - 43-94H - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - MODIFICATION REQUESTi-r rim rrr rr1.1 I1 illlllllli� VACANT ZONING IP rr1Tn f Lill 11 111[111 L ------ �L, _ r-r _ J I I I FUTURE I I OFFICE I L- r_ _ - I I I I I sunOlNc I I D F - HORSETO H EAS71 BUSINE3 PAR1H I t T A PART FILING TWO PROPOSED FOX MEADOWS CONVENIENCE CENTER ZONING RMP PROPERTY OESCRIPnON ♦..r r y I.w. L.. rr.r0/•.• r a..r. al. T.r./r l IrM r.r Y M.1.I.uN Nr•r. Yrr. � r M C.rR yr. C.rr. err. rr �• Pr...r .rsr Irw yrr.. r y r.I r Irl..1 WrV r.rl •..Y.11. a.Y. a.wm'NOT rr a r ,w.a..rr ..n. Ytr.. rY•. wear. r r.rl.�rr arar al: r r.r rrrr um•mm..• am r r r Tort a.rwarw r �wrr r.. r r r rw m•mis r NLII r.0 spa Mr. N•/RO•,Y..•. WSOu r. w.....r_� r r trrr rOY...Nr Yr.r N•NOP..n.n.l lba M r r Yr r.W rr.r M•gOP wra nit r.crw. r.rrwr.rwlsm r.rr.rrr,r w..rr r._II MY rYrr.I a ww rrr.w...y N•YTO' 1..41N31 M....w r r srrr.. rr.4 r m•aaw•...r r.rm r r r M r.r+ r w r•rrar ww >u Yr r rr r w r y ww lam y ar....a N•sIT' YM. t ltil r... r.. ww.. r r Irrrl..Yr..�r.r• r N•PO►. .rrrlamr rrrrrrrr.Mw'Nx w.. a,�1 L.rrrrr r Y.r r r•�•. M r•oo• wa r).0 r.. w...rY. r ar rr . rrr.rrv.w•.. rrranm yrrwrrrr.Mm•a.orwr rn t.a r a.r r w w r wY xn tr r. M m•mv r a.au M1.v r•a M N•OfM N.t Nm y r. M mW'n• rR Wt 1..a M. M m•W W 1/.M1 1asiOlw Y. w �.... Y Y a.✓✓r M....r.l./. r tl'aTOP. . rrl Y ISLs Iw r Y.r. r wY. a.s MY•Y'ls• IR a1J0 rq r r.{ r wrr..Y IYr r.rs.rrrrrr.rrrw r.r.r ararM r•oTs ar, Tor r.. w....... r r a..a..r r.r..r.rt r r•.na, ..rrw.. tl.r r.rw..rwTr+w.e r+. rrarw. r.+ ar+am r<a.ut rr: v. M tl•ram• as rm r r r IL,r r s.tl•..a lr a.w r.rr. r r y wi.M1. IOJn w_ r Y YFY w r.� w.l.•.a�. w N�.r�ra SCALE: 1'.200P IL O Ltd 7.r . TIMBERLINE ROAD VACANT POTENTIAL FUTURE MULTI -FAMILY ZONING RMP neuFRAI IMOTFe LAND USE BREAKDOWN L Msrarrrar.rsrr rrwTralrlw.r rlr.,r.rr lR rr Am rr.rRlY.y�ar,r rr•rrrrrwYrA. r rrR+r WY .afar .K TJ4 w IrIY�rWr�r�ww..rrirr4r�.,rrrr•. rrrr—r Cawaaa naaw .Lase r tuar L r.aa+r.yrraa.r t.�ra.r rrrrwa .r Lw.w. IYraw a Ow. w.µ ewea IMNI .K .Y1f L a.,r►rrr�.l.�rrawr....rr rrtm r.a a..rr rrw I...r. 11ssr AIN hrtld Ya)m .a,• nmr rww. �a a IrrrwarrrN.rrarrrrarr ra.Y r..arrrrlrr hlYy rr'. •a• r"r .rw an .w a rrrwrir.aNO.Yr.rTa.NlV.rrrNrN .wY\Illr ..Pr Y rr r.r Aw IT rl L LrrHrrs rrPrL N.rll•rlr rl.wRrw.rY rN4 r.Fr.lYrw Tr YrYln 'ITr� rrrarrr.r�r HWnvn tlWals Wlpl,1 r a 1. M•rryANrrr w.wYr rrlar/r.�srrwr..a. .ww.,rarrarar W a Mw...irrrra..a,r�rr,�..Lrwr rgnr�..r r.r.darar.r/.rraralrrr ..t L•11/rr•rr�rr.INY.r.rrrN�Nr.YKlrwr�rN r.rrra.r.r rr.ww.rrr�r rrrr.rrr.rw_ r r Irrr r.yr.tl ryr.rrwr+�` � r Ws s. MY4s .rarrrr.r. _ u a.rna.�r+.rr.r'rar,Irr.rrM.rroPr► 11. Ts.rs�raw.NrrrsAlasrrPYr.Nsss awsr era IL lY..rNrdrr.11,waia.rr Ysa....rr Y...r. rrrrr r 1L lrr'.rrrrrrNrMrr.rY.arai.or YRY PROJECTED LAND USE MIX • ap/r11q.1 i.Om r.Rr N.®..11. RWiyrrOlrnw rims rR sues rJa IrTAr .Am µartaaN rw srrr�lr 1rs Na rLrM Rlr.rlflrl4lf lee0 •sar NAN.a� •• ral lrm Lr.srrlprM I • am.uw wv r.,r+aw NnYraL rtrm.rTnua •• par or sw.r..t rrrMw.ar w.lr ul<rm rTr.Ir. .Tar. u®n awls m TNwi e.e. ROAD. I FQFND E06Tw naEA 44 DlCVU NIAM Ta! fO+rmR T ® ORI.YNTAL TIQL a, 1aNCkI - PAW-M aTN•RAIm Pal R AL[j!pNpILITT RMTO O Dam P41.C)ICi V VACUr* MID AIR 1 - i h (1) (1) l 1 I I. •� I FILING TWO PRELIMINARY SITE AND w LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH Ior + e ^ MINOR AMENDMENT Description of the change and reasons(s) for the request: Mblil C&Tla 9 0AW tdt4 r/ Use C0I% APPROVALS: Planning Action: Date: Building Inspection Action: Date: Engineering Action: Date: Other (if applicable): AM6,vto OR1960 P L4• b (:WGf, LA40� IW� a 5' IT* NO AVV646 IMPA A6 AecEfsS�Y 5t-IF&O-T l,4S6 Fob "et-011-IM '. CERTIFICATION I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge, consent, and authority of the owners of the property (including all owners having a legal or equitable interest in the real property, as defined in Section 102 of the City Code; and including common areas legally connected to or associated with the property which is the subject of this application) without whose consent and authority the requested action should not lawfully be accomplished. Pursuant to said authority, 1 hereby permit City officials to enter upon the property for the purpose of inspection, and if necessary, for posting a public notice on the property. \ ,/ Name (please PRINT): � 1/ri li ' �^�r UL � i Today's Date_ 720 • / q EForOffice Use Only; Effective Date lanning File #_ Planner Project Name: r prl�t)'- H612$ it�Y Project Location (Street Address): '�?o Project Description: Mira L1�56 CEATb4 GAu5TIH&) General Information: List all property owners having a legal/equitable interest in the property (Attach separate sheets if neces ary). �R N/F, r G � I UNrT .0 uP ( Owner's Name s): Street Address: City/State/Zip: _ \&(,N ya � CO bo301 , Telephone:410) 4 2-q,0oo Fax: Current planning Department Application Form Land Use Information: Gross Acreage/Square Footage: It PvC2E Existing Zoning: Ci Proposed Use: G I✓ Total Number of Dwelling Units: u/S Total Commercial Floor Area: q►000 d-;. Applicant's/Consultant's Name: 6 S5%1401cw Name of firm: toG1�417wUl41: wi&r Contact: 45p%\16- Street Address: .7,+ J_hwA 45, . City/State/Zip: Fr tot i45 r Go "2(e Telephone: ft) 267:Qf24- Fax: 2Z5-0250 Type of Request Please indicate the type of application submitted by checking the box preceding appropriate request(s). Additional handouts are available explaining submittal requirements for each of the following review processes. ❑ Annexation Petition with Initial Zoning REQUESTED ZONE: Fee $1,040.00 ❑ Rezoning Petition REQUESTED ZONE: Fee $856.00 ❑ Overall Development Plan (ODP) Fee: $1,400.00 + $.50 for each APO label O Project Development Plan (PDP) without Subdivision Plat Fee: $1,472.00 + $.50 for each APO label ❑ Project Development Plan (PDP) with Subdivision Plat Fee: $2,128.00 + $.50 for each APO label ❑ Final Plan without Subdivision Plat Fee: $2,808.00 ❑ Final Plan with Subdivision Plat Fee: $3,896.00 ❑ Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) Fee: $1,472.00 + % of the Preliminary Subdivision Plat fee & $.50 for each APO label ❑ Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Fee: $2,808.00 + y, of the Final Subdivision Plat Fee NOTE: PDP'SANDFINAL (PRELIMINARYAND FINAL P.U.D.'S) M4YBESUBMITTED ASA ❑ Preliminary Subdivision Plat Fee: $1,3120.00 ❑ Final Subdivision Plat Fee: $2,176.00 ❑Minor Amendment Fee: $168.00 ❑Major Amendment Fee: $2,808.00 ❑ Non -Conforming Use Review Fee: $1,216.00 ❑ Vacation of ROW or Easement Fee: $5.00 per sheet of filing document mall Project Fees Fee: Varies -Check with the Current Planning Department ❑ Street Name Change Fee: $5.00 ❑ Extension of Final Approval Fee: $496.00 ❑ Modification of Standards Fee: $200.00 Citv of For Collin% COMBINED APPLICATIONSUBJECT TO TILE FINAL PUN FEE. L;�CERTIFICATIONONREIIERSE.SIDEAIU.STIIESICNED. GS Aug-19-99 14:37 P.O2 IJivision 4.22. to rlo.y enl Muriel nivision -1.220), (g) Bcd and breakfast establishments. (h) Funeral homes. (i) Health and membership clubs. 0) Convenience shopping centers. (k) Convention and conference center. If single-family detached dwellings are provided, at least an equivalent number of non -single-family detuched dwelling units shall also be provided. (3) Dimensional Standards. (a) Maximum building height for all nonresidential uses shall be four (4) stories. Maximum building height for residential uses shall be three (3) Stories. (b) All new structures greater than fifty thousand (50,000) square feet in gross leasable area shall he subject to Planning and Zoning Board review. _ (c) Any building addition that exceeds fifty thcxisand (50,0(X)) square feet in gross leasable area and exceeds twenty-five (25) percent of the gross leasable area of the existing building shall be subject to Planning and 7A)ning Board review. {G) Development Standards. (1) Site Design. (a) in the case of multiple parcel ownership, to the extent reasonably feasible, an applicant shall enter into cooperative agreements with adjacent property owners to create a comprehensive development plan that establishes an integrated pattern of street%, outdoor spaces, building styles and land uses. (b) Where an employment or industrial use abuts a residential area, there shall be no drastic and abrupt change in the scale and height of buildings. Article /. Phip 150 Sapp. 6 Auto-19-99 24:36 Diviatnrt 4.22. & lop'Pxenl District Division 4.22(8) g. Veterinary Hospitals. 9. Drive-in restaurants (only if located in a convenience shopping center). lo. Convention and conference center. (d) Industrial Uses: 1. Dry-cleaning plants. (e) Accessory/Wmel mem Uses: I. Heliports and helipads. (C) Prohibitcd Uses. All uses that are not (1) expressly allowed as permitted uses in this Section or (2) determined to be permitted by the Director pursuant to Section 1.3.4 of this Land Use Code shall be prohibited. (D) Land Use Standards. (1) Prospect Road Streetscape Program. All development in this zone district that is located within the planning area for the Prospect Road Streetscape Program shall also comply with the Prospect Road Streetscape Standards as adopted by the city, to the extent that such Standards apply to the property proposed to he developed. (2) Secondary Uses. The following permitted uses shall be considered secondary uses in the E zone district and together shall occupy no more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total gross area of the development plan. ' (a) Veterinary facilities and small animal clinics. (b) Clubs and lodges. (c) Child care centers. (d) Residential uses. (e) Standard restaurants. (f) Lodging establishments. Article 4, Page 149 Sapp. 6 Pad D. H.E.B.P. Modifications of Standards Request 10/ B/ 99 We believe the proposed use meets the intent of the City Plan and is preferable to a plan meeting the strict requirements and interpretation of the 25% criteria. The resulting land use of a single -user restaurant will provide the community with a mix of uses originally intended and an economically feasible project that would be supported by the general public. Submitted, Stephen J. Steinbicker, A,IA Pad D. H.E.B.P. Modifications of Standards Request 10/B/99 MODIFICATIONS TO ACCESSORY USE Modification of standard 4.22(D)(2). The f'oL Lowiwg permdtted uses shall be considdered seaomotoirU uses Ln the 6 - ZoM district Lind together shall occupy no more thaw 2s'(of'the total gross area of the developvuevtitplavti. 1. The preliminary PUD approval status for Pad D has lapsed, based upon the current City Plan land use adoption. The current City Plan standards/principles are in effect and apply to this proposal. 2. The property is now located in an 'E' - Employment District, which does allow restaurant uses under a Type II review process. Planning & Zoning Commission approval is required for the modification of standard as it relates to accessory use and associated percentages. 3. The request is for a modification to 100% of a single 9,000 s.f. building on Pad D. within the Horsetooth Business Park, be permitted, as a secondary restaurant use. JUSTIFICATIONS 1. The Pad D development proposal would constitute less than 10% of the total allowable building area, as well as less than 10% of the total site area of the original proposed development site. 2. The development fosters the intent of the City Plan and its principles and standards by encouraging accessible compact development patterns of mixed -use developments. 3. The proposed plan would advance and protect the publics interest equally well or better. 4. The granting of this modification would result in a benefit to the immediate areas users and others, specifically as related to limited availability to other restaurant facilities, traffic trip generation and pollution issues. 5. The requirement of limiting the secondary restaurant use, by percentages of less than 100%, in this case, specifically pose undue hardship on the owner / restauranteur by forcing him into a multi -tenant facility, encouraging fast - food uses and discouraging sit-down facilities, that would not be competitive with all other restaurants of this nature. 6. In our original application for modification review, dated July 27,1999, it was stated by Advance Planning Staff that the original idea of limited secondary uses was based on the Harmony Corridor Plan study of employment park -type development. "It explicitly allowed the secondary uses to be considered in the context of an Overall Development Plan (ODP) or other larger plan. This site should be considered in light of (or the context of) the Horsetooth East Business Park ... In any case, the Advance Planning Department supports the modification 0 it proves to be needed. 0 Mffl L.L.C. ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING MODIFICATION REQUEST HORSETOOTH EAST BUSINESS PARK FIUNG TWO, PAD D October 8, 1999 We are submitting a request for a modification of standards for the Horsetooth East Business Park, Fling Two, Pad D, regarding the following item: 1. Modification of standard 4.22[0](2). me followLKal permtted uses shall, be covLsidered secovLdary uses Lv� the 6 - zoM distrLct av of toC)ether ShRLL occupy no vnore thaw 257o ofthe total nroSS area of the de✓60pvuevLt pLaA. PLANNING OBJECTIVES Horsetooth East Business Park, Fling Two, is a 10.27 acre mixed - use development initiated under the Land Use Development Guidance System in 1995. The Preliminary Site Plan was taken to Final Site Plan development approvals on fire of the original seven pad sites. Of the remaining two sites this request is specifically dedicated to the 'Pad D' site, as originally delineated on the preliminary site plan. 1. Horsetooth East Business Park was originally planned with several design objectives in mind: * Provide for a mixed -use development of business- type uses as a primary basis for the development, with compatible uses including offices, financial institutions, warehouse/industrial, retail, convenience, fast food and sit-down restaurants, as accessory, secondary and supportive ancillary uses. * Locate this type of development at such proximity as to be easily absorbed into the arterial road system bounded by the sites. * Locate this type of mixed use development in proximity to adjacent residential neighborhoods. * Create neighborhood activity centers with multi-user benefits, i.e.. day /office park users as well as adjacent neighborhood residents. * Provide relative scale and architectural compatibility with existing and future developments. * Encourage pedestrian activity to multi -use areas and at the same time discourage "cross-town' traffic, by providing similar types of services to a variety of users, specifically those living and working in the immediate areas. As a result of the parks development to date, a limited number of mixed -uses have been provided in the form of offices, auto related service, convenience and retail. One of the initial design parameters was to have included restaurant related facilities, but as of yet, not been incorporated. 970.207.0424 748 HINSOALE DRIVE 970.225.0252 FAX FORT COLLINS•10 80526 T TURF ARCNI E[ i 1011111 [Uff4 Ulm ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING 4b o. E ous law *OK- NavlFICArleus mow. I G�Yo6ER ts, I �IqR OCT 0 8 1999 D & !p I g( HeArl4pra AW 9" Nor c%o� GiiAK or fi r'. 5. (�) o#eANw eaAtj t*F Appuokmag �, �,� GQuts7taas fit. � HN�N13 � � �It�►u°a+rt,_ 970-207.0424 748 HINSDALE DRIVE 970-225.0252 FAX FORTCOLLINSvCO B0526