The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHORSETOOTH EAST BUSINESS PARK PUD - PRELIMINARY/FINAL - 43-94 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY1989 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTER5ECTIONS - tgS5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIDNS SIMMAn REPOR. •fitstttat{{#*f4a4#*fta#***#1.1'##*#44.F4#Y1t44**#4r !#rYala*stfla*#as**444f##R . SUMMARY REPORT RaaRRllrRf44Ra4ra4aYRaa!#tat*at*r###�l4aiR*444#r###if##fa44t***ri#Fi'kttR#♦ . INTEPSECTION..horsetooth/timberline IidTERSECTION..norsecoothizimeerline AREA TYPE ..... OTHER - AREA TYPE ..... OTHER .. - ANALYST ....... +me ANALV5T....... imd , DATE ...... .....8118/94 DATE�.. T I flE......... TIME........ am ®m COMME COMMENT....... 1994 -- IM_.ti VOLUMES GEOMETR'r NB SB ' � VOLUMES -________ - GEOMETRY EB WE'NB56 cB piP L 12.1 Eb WB NB SB EB W^ .NB Sb i, L L.T 250 i00 i50 i50 _2.0 ._.v i2.0 T '-=.'> LT 190 i00 205 145 L ,_.0 L 1'_. Cr L 1"'.0 L __.0 " TH 290 221) 44C'. 490 x T 12.0 T ' 2.0 ' R `-=.0 R - 2.C: TH 175 775 5C5 640 : T 12 f.1 -T 12.0 -T 12.0 -T _ 12.0 . RT 240 ITS i25 170 a R 12.0 P. 12.0 12.0 -.? F.T 230 155 Yni, 27U R 12.0 R 12. i, .R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 5i.1 5!� 5O 50 12.0 1 T.O - �2.C, 2'.l! i RR 50 50 50 Si, 12.0 12.0 � 12.0 12.0. 12.0 - 12.0 r?_,0 - 12.�) i 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _ - •2.0 • __sees_______________________-__. 12.0 12.0 12_O 12.0 1^.0 _-_____--______________________________ - ADJUSTMENT FACTORS - � BUT. ARR. - TY-E -- _-___ __-_---___-__________-____-_-__--___________-___-sees_-______-___ - - ABUSES ENT FACTORS " - GRAPE HV ADJ PNM BUSES - c•HF REDS PED. vi R1 min T _ GRADE' HV ADJ FKG BUSES PHF FEDS FED. BUT. � ARR. TYPE . IZ7 fY: Y/N NM iJb 5.8 - (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T cB U,i,U 2. UO N 5 5 N. <5' S Eb 0. 00 2.00 N U Cl O. 90 5 N Clf, N C1 O 0. 9C. WB 0.00 - - - 5 !J _ e - - WB n•00 C.00 N U U 0.90 5 N 25.8 3 NE O. i3O -• UO n! C 0 0. 9U __ - NB O. 00 2. 00 N 0 . 0 - U. 90 5 N 25. 8 - 3 SB -. 0•'l�' sees__-_ __-__________________ .. 5B t)..Oi, 2.00 N- 0 0 0.90 5.. N 25.8 -3 . SIGNAL 5ETTPES CY='LE'VGTH = _E F.H_3 60.0 PH SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH =' 85.0 Pry-4 PH-i P*H-2 - - 1 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-c PH-1 PH-2 PH 3 PH. .. E8 LT X - NB :X LT .X .1 - X - I EB LT X. X - - N6 LT - X X - Try _ { - TH _ X TH % TH X. _ - RT X RT PD X .- -- �. RT - X - - - RT - X r X. cb LT X PD X iW6 Li X X TH .. X _PDX Wb- LT - X� X T SB LT X X Tr. X RT X .... TH X -RT TH X �R. % PD % - .. .. X RT - X D X- GREEN7.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN - - -•• �` ) C•. C. ..- - O.j• GREEN 7.0 20.0 0.0 O.0 GREEN - - 7.0 =3.0 0.17 . O.Ii YELLOW 4.0 S.v 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 _-__�------------- " YELLOW 4.0 5.A O.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS ;- _ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP., V/C G/C DELAY •, 2U-U C LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0 1S) C 383 ° b ED 0. 046 0. 388 12.7 B 15.8 C T O, 904 i 1, 200 =Ci, 4 0 D - .L .. . T i,.422 0. 259 ll.3 C - R 0.697 0.200 18.4 C �,n.5 B F- - 0. 510 - 0. 259 18.2 C. - Wb L O. 072 0.=8_ 8.8 t` Wb L - O. D46 0.388 - 22.= - b - 26.0 D T U.6B6 U. 2U0 17.5 - 9 - T" i1;903 0. 259 =2.3 D . R e.-11 1).200 13.4 b 13.7 B R 0.297 Q. 259: 16.5 C NB L 0. 032 i,.517 5.4 C .- NB L 0: U46 .0.541 7.0 B 14.6 B T 0. 82= 0.33= !7.3 B .. Q. 810 0. 41_ 18. C . . R O.i65 0. 3E3 9.1 5.4 R i7.6 - .T - ... R 0. OB9 0.4i2 9.9 b- n 0=•% D. 517 $b L 24.s C .. 'SB ` L 0.046 0.541 7.0 - b .. 24.0 C 7 0.917 0.353 9:3 B --.-. -: T 0.969 0.412 �2.1 D R :).26a 9.533 -_ _______-__-___-_-_ P. _ r.92 0. 412 11.5 Eb ING-"-�TION• De:av i6.F °.5eCl Veh) T_RSEC \/%C = _ _ __________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION:. Delay - 20.4 (=sec/veh) V/C = 0. 694 LOS = C CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ---- ------------------------------------'------------- ------ Z ��i i IK.K X.7. M M Z ZiiYY Y. YZM.' YY ZM[Z'<Y M.' XY X Z]KZ��tY?' �..<>.%tZ �T Z Y Y.IK MM ZJRXZ �'M :k Ct�Yt ♦.X -------- POTEN- ACTUAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE --------------'------------------------------------------------------ RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph)c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 M SH R SH p PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 ------' -------- --------- -----'------ ------------ --- AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 MINOR STREET EB LEFT 33 120 101 > 102 101 > 68 68 >E E NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... big horn THROUGH 1 163 145 > 145 > 144 > p NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline RIGHT 28 751 751 751 724 NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid MINOR STREET W8 LEFT 44 129 112 > 113 112 > 68 68 >E E DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 THROUGH 1 162 145 > 145 > 144 > D TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. a pm p1 p2 •� RIGHT 72 789 789 789 717 A - OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR STREET - SB LEFT 83 627 627 627 545 ..�,A- INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL - NB LEFT 22 566 566 566 "544 A . INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH IDENTIFYING INFORMATION CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN ------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... big horn CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN NAME OF THE DATE AND TIME NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... OF THE ANALYSIS..... timberlin 8/18 am pm pt P2 OTHER INFORMATION.... TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB S8 ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 30 40 20 75 THRU 1 1 447 528 - RIGHT 25 65 10 15 - NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE i EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 ;/ 2) 2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R 0 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ZZZXZZZXMXZZ X.X XXXZXZXXXZXZZXXXXXXZZZXXX ZZZXXXZX'KXXXXZZZZZZXXXXZXZZZXZ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. ............... 15pm PI 0 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH - CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 30 35 55 THRU 1 1 381 441 RIGHT 10 55 5 40 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- _ ES WB NB SB LANES ----Z-- ----Z--,--2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + -R - a CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ----------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET I EB LEFT 6 158 137 > 143 137 > 137 131 >D D THROUGH 1 208 189 > 189 > 188 > D RIGHT 11 778 778 778 767 MINOR STREET WB LEFT 33 168 151 > 152 151 > 118 118 >D D THROUGH 1 201 183 > 183 > 182 > D ! RIGHT 61 821 821 821 _ .761 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 61 681 681 681 - t-620.,�. ,, A . NB LEFT 39 610 610 610 572 -A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/18 ; am pm p1 -p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)._.... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am ® P1 8 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 30 40 20 75 THRU 1 1 745 880 RIGHT 25 65 10 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------- EB WB NB 58 ------ ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- ----------------- ------------ ----------- --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 33 72 54 > 55 54 > 20 21 >E E THROUGH 1 91 78 > 78 > 77 > F RIGHT 28 335 335 335 308 � MINOR STREET WB LEFT 44 72 58 > 59 58 > 14 14 >E E THROUGH 1 91 78 > 78 > 77 > E RIGHT 72 407 407 407 335 B MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 83 499 499 499 417 A NB LEFT 22 422 422 - 422 400 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberlin� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/18 amJpni P1 p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... ��/ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xsssxxxsxsxsxsssxxxxssxsxsxxxxssssxsxxsssxsxxssxxxsxxsssssxxxxxssxxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION - - AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... .1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ am pm pi p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- . LEFT 5 30 35 55 THRU 1 1 655 735 RIGHT 10 55. 5 40 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB. NB SB ------- ------- -------— - ----- LANES LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R - 9 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 77 63 > 66 63 > 60 57 >E E i THROUGH 1 105 94 > 94 > 93 > E RIGHT 11 404 404 404 393 1. MINOR STREET WB LEFT 33 81 71 > 71 71 > 37 38 >E E THROUGH 1 103 91 > 91 > 90 > E RIGHT 61 461 461 461 401 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 61 561 561 561 501 A NB LEFT 39 486 486 486 448 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------- ---------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST WEST STREET...... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/18 am pm pl p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Y###YYYY####YYYY##Y#####Y#YY########Y#########YY#Y#####YYYYY#######YY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... automation NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am 8ED OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 40 50 15 THRU 306 483 1 1 RIGHT 30 5 70 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- -- ---- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET . NB LEFT 55 203 192 > 192 192 > 136 137 >D D THROUGH 1 239 229 > 229 > 228 > RIGHT 77 846 846 846 769 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 17 178 161 > 164 161 > 146 144 >D D THROUGH 1 234 224 > 224 > 223 > C RIGHT 17 775 775 775 759 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 6 605 605 605 600 A WB LEFT 44 726 726 726 682 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... automation DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/18 ; am pm pl p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UN3iGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR... .................. 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... automation NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm(E) OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------- ----------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROLTYPENORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB --- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 15 45 30 5 THRU 435 288 1 1 RIGHT 50 15 50 5 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- - - EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 ------ 2 2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R - - CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pace-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------ --------------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 33 218 204 > 204 204 > 170 171 >D D THROUGH 1 250 235 > 235 > 234 > r RIGHT 55 777 777 777 722 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 6 195 175 > 182 175 > 175 169 >D D THROUGH 1 244 229 > 229 > 228 > C RIGHT 6. 863 863 863 857 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 17 755 755 755 739 A W8 LEFT 50 607 607 607 558 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... automat n DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/16 am Pm pi p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... 19e5 HCMi: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS. . SUMMARY REPORT INT-eRSECTION..horsetooth/timberline AREA TYPE..... OTHER - ANALYST ....... ,imd .. DATE.......... 8/18/94 - TIME.......... KED am.. - COMMENT ....... 1994 __________________________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB - WB NB SB LT 250 100 1SO 1GO : L .12.0 L 12.0 L i2.0 L i2.0 TH 290. 220 - 440 490 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 240 17.5 125 170 : R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 50 50 50 50 : 12.0. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0- .. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ___________ _________________________________________________ _____ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE. - HV _ ADJ PKG BUSES PHF F'EDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%Y Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2. 00N 0 0 0.90 . 5 N 25.B 3 WB 0.00 2.00 N. 0 O 0.90 5 N 25.6 3 NB 0.00 2.00 _ N O 0 0.90 - 5 N 25.e 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0. 0.90 5 N 25.8 3 _______________________________________________________________ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 ..PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3' PH-4 " EH LT x x - NB LT X _ x TH - X - TH x RT x - RT x _ PD x PD X WB -LT X X SS LT x x - TH X TH x ' RT x" RT x PD x PD x GREEN 7.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 IS.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.(I YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ------------- ________________-------------------------------- _____________ -LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP-. DELAY APP. LOS - EB L 0.150 Ci. 383 9.2 B 20.0 C T u. 904 C).200 3Ci.4 D - - R 0.697 0.200 1B.4 C WB L 0.032 0. 383 .. 8.8 B 14.5 B T 0. 686 0. 200 17.5 C R 0.311 0. 200 13.4 B NB L 0. 032 0.517 5.4 B 13.7 B . T 0. 627 0. 337, - 17.3 C R 0.165 0.333 9.1 B SB L 0.032 0. 517. 5.4_ B 17.6 C T 0. 917. O. Ste' 24-1 .. C R 0.264 0.333 9:5 B __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: - Delav =- 16.9 (seciveh) V/C = 0.578 LOS = C 19e5 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - - SUMMARY REPORT - ++*+++*++++++#+i�ir**#+i*#fir+++##**#i+fi*++*#++*++++++++*+**+++##+++iir++#+ INTERSECTIOIJ..hersetooth/timberline _ AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... amd DATE.......... 8/SB/94 TIME .......... am om COMMENT....... 1994 ------------- _____________________________________________________________ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WE NB SB : EB -WB NB SB . LT 190 100 205 145 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 - L 12.0 TH 175 _375 535 640 : T 12.0 T 12.0. "T 12.0 T _12.0 RT 27.0 155 100 276 :.R 12.0 R --12.0 R 12.0 R 1220 RR 50 50 50 50 : 12.0 12.0 -12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 . 12.0 12.0 .12.0 12 O - ------------------------- ______________________________________________ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS" - GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS, PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ._(%) . (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T - EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 25.8 3 WB - -0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 �5 N 25.8 3- SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 '5- N 25.B- 3 __________________________________________________________________________ _ - SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 85.0- _ -- PH-1 ..PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4- - EB LT"'" X X 'NB 'LT x _ x` .• . TH - x TH x - RT x RT x PD X PD - x WB LT x x SB LT-" x -x - TH - x TH x - RT x RT - x PD x PD x GREEN - 7.C) 20.0 O.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- _____________-___ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APF'. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0. 046 0.388 12.3 B 15.6 C T 0.422 0.259 17.3 C R 0. 510 0.259 16.2 C WB _ L 0.046 0.38E 1-.71 B 26.0 D T 0. 903 0. 259 zl_.� D R 0.297 0.259 16.5 - -C - NB L 0.046 0.541 7.0 B 14.8 B T 0. B10 0.412 1B.3 C R 0. UB9 0.412 9.9 B . SB .. .L -0.046 0.541 7.0 B _ 24.0 C_. _ T 0. 969 0.412 -2.1 D R 0. 392 0.412 11.5 B ____________________________________________________________________- . INTERSECTION: Delay = 20.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.694 LOS = C APPENDIX C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xx:sxM�x:��xxz�:��::x<�cx�x.casaxzz:x�x.:rcxzx�xxz:<:xa�xxx�a:�a*max:x.w.�� IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 - PEAK HOUR FACTOR ...................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST. ................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)_..... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Gop2 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN - TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 10 40 20 75 THRU 1 1 459 528 RIGHT 15 65 10 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------------------- _____________________________ EB - WB NB SB LANES 2 2 --� LANE USACE LT + P. LT + P CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c.(Pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH --------------- ----------------------------- --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 11 118 99 > 102 99 > 90 88 >E E THROUGH 1 160 142 > 142 > _ 141 > RIGHT 17 751 751 751 735 MINOR STREET WB LEFT 44 128 113 > 113 113 > 68 69 >E E THROUGH 1 159 142 > 142 > 141 > D RIGHT 72 784 784 784 712 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 83 619 619 619 536 A NB LEFT 22 566 566 566 544 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- "• NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.._ .timberline — �� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/18 ; am pm p1 p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 XXMXXXXXXXXXXXXRXXXXW.X XXXXXXXXXXX>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm a p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 30 25 55 THRU 1 1 393 456 RIGHT 10 55 5 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ EB WB NB SB LANES z__ z__ LANE USAGE LT + R LT 4 R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- -------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 156 137 > 143 137 > 137 131 >0 0 THROUGH 1 206 190 > 190 > 188 > RIGHT 11 783 783 783 772 MINOR STREET I WB LEFT 33 171 155 > 156 155 > 122 122 >D D THROUGH 1 204 188 > 188 > 187 > 0 RIGHT 61 815 815 815 755 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 61 670 670 670 609 A NB LEFT 28 617 617 617 590 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.. timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 6/18 am pm p1 P2 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Y �XYXXMtiX�lt�Mzzli�tYMM�t1YXittXXZt��it11�KM��t1�X<iz��i<�tttXL%XKYY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)_..... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am eo p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------- --------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 10 40 20 75 THRU 1 1 765 880 RIGHT 15 65 10 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE - ---------------------------------------------------------- ------ EB WB N8 SB ------ ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paoe-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- ------- -------- ----------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 11 72 54 > 55 54 > 43 43 >E E THROUGH 1 91 78 > 78 > 77 > F RIGHT 17 335 335 335 319 6 MINOR STREET WS LEFT 44 72 59 > 60 59 > 15 15 >E E THROUGH 1 91 78 > 78 > 77 > E RIGHT 72 395 395 395 323. B MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 83 486 486 486 404 A NB LEFT 22 422 422 422 400 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberlin DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/18 ; am pm p1 p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 XXXZZZZZZXXZXXXZZXXXXZXZZXZZZZXXXZZXXXXXXXXZXZXZZYXXYXXXXZZZXZZZZZXXX IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------- ------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 0 p U& p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------- ---------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 30 25 55 THRU 1 1 655 760 RIGHT 10 55 5 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------------------------------------------- --- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- =------ LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + P. CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 77 63 > 67 63 > 60 58 >E THROUGH 1 105 95 > 95 > 94 > RIGHT 11 396 396 396 385 MINOR STREET WB LEFT 33 83 73 > 73 73 > 39 40 >E E THROUGH 1 104 94 > 94 > 93 > E RIGHT 61 461 461 461 401 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 61 561 561 561 501 A NB LEFT 28 486 486 486 459 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... big horn NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/16 ; am pm p1 p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ............:......... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... automation NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.. ..... ......... am e U p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL . -------------------------- ----------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 35 35 15 THRU 312 486 1 1 RIGHT 30 5 60 15 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 39 202 191 > 192 191 > 152 153 >D D THROUGH 1 237 228 > 228 > 227 > RIGHT 66 843 843 843 777 MINOR STREET SB LEFT 17 180 165 > 168 165 > 150 148 >D D THROUGH 1 233 224 > 224 > 223 > C RIGHT 17 774 774 774 757 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 6 603 603 603 597 A WB LEFT 39 720 720 720 682 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... automatio DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/18 ; amn pm p1 p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Y YXXYYXXXXYXXXYXYXXYXXXXXYYXXXXYXXXXXXYXYXXXXYXXXXXXYXYXYYXXXXYYYXXYX IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... automation NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 8/18 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. (B pm pl p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 15 45 25 5 THRU 435 288 1 1 RIGHT 35 15 50 5 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------ ------- LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE USAGE - LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE -------------------------Page_3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- -------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 28 - 221 206 > 207 206 > 179 179 >D D THROUGH 1 253 238 > 236 > 237 > ' RIGHT 55 783 783 783 728 ti MINOR STREET SB LEFT 6 201 180 > 187 180 > 181 175 >D D THROUGH 1 249 234 > 234 > 233 > C RIGHT 6 863 863 863 857 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 17 755 755 755 739 A WB LEFT 50 618 618 618 568 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... horsetooth NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... automation DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 8/18 pm pt p2 OTHER INFORMATION.... APPENDIX B PLAT" RIVER POWER FULL MOVEMENT r ACCESS- -- ---------- ............................. k nTrn�nmtiL try OlPkllI�111{ --------- .. . COLLINDALE GOLF COURSE PARE -EEL _/ A P.S. Co. AUTHORITY I ---------- ) I t t HORSETOOTH ROAD 1 PARCEL// G'/ 12.5 AC* GROSS .t..... . 10.2AP.f NET...... .. . I BUSINESS SERVICES I• �hi hA� y g9ji i i I • A// BIG 1�dRN DRIVE— — - t PL 4ARCEL �/ / PARCEL- 4/ I 4 AC f GROSS .7 AC-+ GROSS 4 AC.f NET 3.9 AC-+ N�T� INDySTRIAL/OFFICE i /6USINESS/�SERVICES ri � I 1 I I —J COLLINDALE BUSINESS PARK rin SITE PLAN APPENDIX A Table 5 Short Range Phase 1 and 2 Peak Hour Operation Intersection Horsetooth/Timberline (signal) Horsetooth/Automation (stop sign) Level of Service (delay) AM PM C (16.8 s/v) C (20.4 s/v) NB LT D D NB T/RT A A SB LT D D SB T/RT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A Timberline/Big Horn (stop sign) EB LT/T E E EB RT B B WB LT/T E E WB RT A B SB LT A A NB LT A A I N ooLO cli LOo--15/5 CD C) � 135/155 LO Z LO 480/805 � '- -N-- 220/375 �— 45/40 HORSETOOTH + 100/100 15/5 - f 250/190 —� f 725/510 i c 0 290/175 Ln Ln c 50/30 —� o z o 240/230 �� 17 U7 O O N LO Q W 3 z J Z R O m O F Q c 00 LO 00 LO o �— 55/65 � r� LO NOM. BIG HORN DRIVE 1 �, 30/40 5/30 ---- 1 T NOM. c Ln c 10/25 � �<:� rl)LO co c AM / PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles. SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC PHASES 1 AND 2 Figure 3 Table 4 Short Range Phase 1 Peak Hour Operation Intersection Horsetooth/Timberline (signal) Horsetooth/Automation (stop sign) Level of Service (delay) AM PM C (16.8 s/v) C (20.4 s/v) NB LT D D NB T/RT A A SB LT D D SB T/RT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A Timberline/Big Horn (stop sign) EB LT/T E E EB RT B B WB LT/T E E WB RT A B SB LT A A NB LT A A �LO o � —15/5 `O z `n 480/810 r + �, �— 45/35 15/5 725/520 -0- 35/30 -� M ::i C:D O z o , N to } a 3 z 0 f= a 0 a SHORT RANGE PHASE 1 HOR BIG HORN DRIVE 0 o u) cli - 135/155 o 0/ 11 100/10000 10 250/190 -� t r 290/175 to LO o 240/230 LO o o LO V) N AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles. 00 U0 Lr) 55/65 '; � � 'j 30/ 30/40 5110 --1 ) } r NOM. o Ln o 10/15--� Lo�Ln N to u7 to PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 0 Figure 2 Table 2 Trip Generation from New Master Plan Land Use Daily . AM Peak PM Peak Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Parcel A PSCo Facility 470 94 80 85 98, Parcel B Office/Ind.- 4.4 Ac. 480 50 9 11 41 Parcel C Bus. Serv.- 10.2 Ac. 6220 105 45 252 262 Parcel D Bus. Serv.- 3.9 Ac. 2360 40 17 96 100 Total 9550 289 151 444 501 Table 3 Trip Generation from Parcel D Land Use Daily AM Peak PM Peak Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Phase 1 - Medical Office 240 14 4 9 20 Building - 7.0 KSF Phase 2 - General Office 590 69 9 14 67 30.0 KSF Total 830 83 13 23 87 Table 1 Trip Generation from Original Site Access Study Land Use Daily AM Peak PM Peak Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Phase 1 - Parcel A Retail - 155.5 KSF 7720 138 82 403 412 Full Development Parcel B Office/Ind.- 100 KSF Parcel C Commercial- 31.75 KSF Parcel D Commercial- 25 KSF Parcel E Office- 40 KSF Parcel F Office/Ind.- 55 KSF Total 970 129 16 25 116 1560 28 17 82 84 1240 22 13 65 66 500 70 9 12 65 530 71 10 14 64 12540 458 149 601 807 NO SCALE SITE PLAN Figure 1 known when this will occur. Recent traffic counts indicate that signal warrants are not met at this intersection. Traffic from Parcel D of Horsetooth East Business Park will not likely use the Timberline/Caribou intersection for left turns. Utilizing the Horsetooth/Automation intersection is more convenient and practical. Therefore, it is concluded that, from an operational perspective, the extension of Automation Way between Parcel B and D cannot be justified. However, this connection certainly will complete the interior road system between the two business parks. It would appear that the users of the Collindale Business Park would find this connection more convenient that the users of the Horsetooth East Business Park. All this notwithstanding, the extension of Automation Way could be made when the Phase 2 portion of Parcel D develops, since there will be Phase 2 frontage along Automation Way in the area where the connection should be made. It is concluded that the proposed accesses to Horsetooth Road and Timberline Road are adequate to serve this site. Stop sign control at these accesses is the proper control at these two accesses. The Horsetooth/Timberline intersection will operate acceptably with the existing geometrics. The existing Timberline- Horsetooth Property Site Access Study September 1988, can continue to serve as the traffic impact study for this property. When other proposals for development are put forth at the Horsetooth East Business Park, similar traffic study updates should be prepared to examine the operation at the key intersections to determine when improvements are required. Due to the timing of Fort Collins High School, future traffic studies should include new peak hour traffic counts in this area. New traffic counts were not practical with this development proposal. The need for extension of Automation Way to Collindale Business Park is not triggered by either Phase 1 or 2 of the Parcel D development. However, Phase 2 will have frontage along the yet unbuilt portion of Automation Way. This would be a practical time to extend Automation Way between Horsetooth East Business Park and Collindale Business Park. right -out access to Horsetooth Road just east of the railroad tracks. This access has been eliminated from the new master plan. Table 3 shows the trip generation for Parcel D with the Phase 1 medical office building and the Phase 2 general office building. The uses proposed in Parcel D, as evaluated in this memorandum, will generate less traffic than that shown in the New Master Plan. The daily trip generation shown in Table 3 is 35 percent of the trip generation shown in Table 2. The morning peak hour increases by 39 trips (168%). The afternoon peak hour decreases by 86 trips (44%). This amendment concentrates on the short range operation, which is significantly different than the short range operation provided in the site access study or the PSCo memorandum. In those studies, the Fort Collins High School, Tower Shoppes, and various residential developments were not development proposals. Fort Collins High School is almost completed and there is significant other development in the area. Since Fort Collins High School is not complete, a short range traffic projection was derived by factoring the Pinecone PUD/Tower Shoppes long range traffic forecasts at the Timberline/Horsetooth intersection by 0.6. Figure 2 shows the short range traffic forecast with the Phase 1 (medical office building and PSCo) traffic assigned to the key intersections. This assignment used the same trip distribution shown in the site access study. Table 4 shows the peak hour operation at the Horsetooth/Timberline signalized intersection and the Horsetooth/Automation and Timberline/Big Horn stop sign controlled intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. The operation at all of the analyzed intersections is considered to acceptable, except for minor street left turns from Big Horn Drive. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better. The level of service E at the Timberline/Big Horn intersection is primarily caused by the background traffic volumes on Timberline Road. These left turns do have a convenient alternative route via the Horsetooth/Automation intersection which will eliminate this left -turn movement from Big Horn Drive. It is recommended that both the Automation Way and Big Horn Drive accesses to their respective arterial streets be striped with a single inbound lane, a left-turn/through exit lane, and a right - turn exit lane. Figure 3 shows the short range peak hour traffic forecast with the Phase 1 and Phase 2 traffic assigned to the key intersections. Table 5 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The intersections will operate similarly to that shown in Table 4. City staff requested information whether Automation Way should be connected south to Caribou Drive with Phase 1 or Phase 2. Currently, Automation Way is not complete between Parcels B and D of the Horsetooth East Business Park. The Timberline/Caribou intersection will eventually be signalized, however, it is not W x _v J W O ►2 W x H f- MEMORANDUM To: Libby Glass, W.W. Reynolds Companies Eldon Ward, Cityscape Tom Vosburg, Fort Collins Transportation Division Fort.Collins Planning Department From: Matt Delich� Date: August 22, 1994 Subject: Horsetooth East Business Park Traffic Study Addendum (File: 9486MEM1) It has been proposed that a medical office building be built at the Horsetooth East Business Park located in the southwest quadrant of the Timberline/Horsetooth intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. The medical office building is to be located on the east side of the Horsetooth East Business Park on Parcel D. The revised master plan for Horsetooth East Business Park is shown in Appendix A. This memorandum serves as an addendum to the Timberline-Horsetooth Property Site Access Study, September, 1988 and the Horsetooth Business Park Traffic Study Update memorandum, February 4, 1991. The Timberline-Horsetooth Property is now known as the Horsetooth East Business Park. This memorandum addresses the trip generation and the short range operation with the implementation of the medical office building. The scope of this memorandum was discussed with Fort Collins Transportation Division staff. Figure 1 shows the site plan of Parcel D with the medical office building shown as Phase 1. The medical office building will be 7,000 square feet. Phase 2, as shown in Figure 1, is expected to be a 30,000 square foot office building. In the original site access study, the land uses assumed for the entire site are shown in Table 1 along with the daily and peak hour trip generation. Table 2 shows the trip generation from the new Horsetooth East Business Park. The daily trip generation shown in Table 2 is 76 percent of the trip generation shown in Table 1. The morning peak hour decreases by 167 trips (28%). The afternoon peak hour decreases by 463 trips (33%). Given this reduction in trip generation from the overall Horsetooth East Business Park, it is concluded that the existing site access study should be used as the traffic study for this property. While it may overstate the trip generation and operation to some degree, it adequately addresses the access, control, and geometric requirements for the Horsetooth East Business Park in the long range future. The site access study included a right -in/