HomeMy WebLinkAboutBRIDGEFIELD P.U.D., PHASE I - FINAL - 45-94A - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (3)•
PROJECT
' City of Fort Collins COMMENT SHEET
Planning
DATE: 23 January 1995 . DEPARTMENT:
C: _i
PROJECT: 45-94A BRIDGEFIELD PLID, Ph I & II - Final
PLANNER: Steve Olt
All comments must be received by: Friday, 3 Feb 1995
❑ No Problems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
GiCC✓ }2�7 LoC t<� Oti IA�c.ti l�+�Jc
(0 5 vi L i- , (, cA c� -e, in 4 S In o w v� .
Date: Z — 2 _ 5 Signature.
CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT
COPIES OF REVISIONS; ❑ SITE .
❑ LANDSCAPE
❑ UTILITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281 NORTH COLLEGE P.O.BOX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0560
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (303)221-6750
Cultural, .Abri
Forestry Division
City of Fort Collins
DT: February 9, 1995
TO: Steve Olt, City Planner
and Recreational Services
MEMORANDUM
FR: Tim Buchanan, City Forester T l3
RE: Bridgefield PUD
!�o
All existing trees including those along the ditch need to be accurately located 4 0
on the Site Landscape Plan. The row of Green Ash along the west property line 1
are significant and should be retained. To successfully preserve these trees,
close coordination of the Landscape and Utility Plans will need to occur. If the v
plans approved by the Planning and Zoning Board show the trees to be retained,
then it should be the expectations that adequate protection and engineering 7 /
occur to insure they survive. If they can't be retained with this design, that \ j
should be decided now and mitigation planned for. Each major tree needs to have
a undisturbed zone of 8-10 feet from the trunk in all directions.
The Forestry Division will not be able to provide maintenance or all the trees
on the right-of-way. This note needs to be added to the Landscape Plan.
/j
1 Street trees along Prospect and Bridgefield on the right-of-way will be
maintained by the City Forestry Division. All other trees on this project
shall be maintained by the homeowners association.
281 North College Avenue • Fort Collins, CO 80324 • (303) 221-6361
Should you have any questions regarding this issue please contact me at 224-6035.
Sincerely,
B it Hamdan
as
Civil Engineer
xc: Mr. Bob Blanchard, Chief City Planner
Mr. Steve Olt, Planner
Mr. Jon Prouty
File
Utility SE ces
Stormwater
City of Fort Collins
January 27, 1995
Mr. Jack Blake, P.E.
Stewart and Associates
103 S. Meldrum St.
Fort Collins, CO 80521.
Re: Bridgefield PUD (Phases 1 and 2) Final submittal
Dear Jack,
The Bridgefield PUD drainage report was submitted to the Stormwater Utility on Monday
January 23 '. Upon a preliminary check of submitted materials it became obvious that this
submittal falls below the acceptable standards for a final submittal. According to Section 2.2.2.1
of the City of Fort Collins Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual all final submittals shall include
the calculations for the design of storm sewers. As presented the materials submitted omits this
part and does not size any of the storm drainage conveyance system shown on the overall Utility
Plan as well as on the Drainage Plan.
The proposed Bridgefield development should be given special drainage considerations due to the
relatively small size of streets. This smaller street standard precludes draining the major storm
flows through surface flow. Thus an extensive storm sewerage network will be required for this
development. That presents some difficulty since the storm sewer lines, as well as water and
sanitary sewers are to be located within this same smaller Right Of Way width of the streets. As
currently shown several storm sewers are located under and behind sidewalks and thus would be
infringing on Electric Utility easements. Additionally many inlets are shown to be located on
private property with no public easements.
It is City of.Fort Collins policy to reject incompletelmadequate submittals within 48 hours from
submittal date. Since these issues were raised after this initial 48 hour period, this submittal will
be initially kept on the agenda of items to be discussed at. Interdepartmental Review on February
6' 1995 . However, speaking from a Stormwater Utility standpoint only, it will be required that
a complete drainage report (including the missing information noted above and accompanied by
a complete design of all utility lines that would resolve potential utility conflicts) be submitted to
the Stormwater Utility no later than 3:00 p.m. Wednesday February 1 a 1995, for this item to be
recommended to be considered for the March P&Z hearing. Otherwise, the Stormwater Utility
will recommend that this item be continued to the April P&Z hearing and the new and complete
plans and report should be submitted no later than February 21" 1995.
235 Mathews Street • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6589 • FAX (303) 221-6239
6. The location and dimension of all on- and off -site easements are required on
utility plans.
7. The size and type of all culverts must be labeled.
8. The location, size, and type of all a)dsting utilities —including power -must be
included in the Utility Plan.
9. Water surface profiles shown for all open channel profiles.
10. Spot elevations at crosspans and other critical areas.
11. Dimensions of all streets.
12. Calculations for culvert and riprap sizing in report.
Please review the Design Criteria chapter of the SDDC manual and include all required
information.
c:\comment\brigfld.fin
.40
X
0
City of Fort Collins
Planning
PROJECT
COMMENT SHEET
DATE; 23 January 1995 DEPARTMENT:,'�Aa!
PROJECT: 45-94A BRIDGEFIELD PUD, -Ph I & II - Final
PLANNER: Steve Olt
All comments must be received by: Friday, 3 Feb 1995
❑ No oblems
Problems or Concerns (see below)
comments:
As was previously expressed and agreed to by the developer, this development proposal will
be postponed from the March P&Z schedule and at the earliest it could be on the April P&Z
agenda.
The main concerns expressed at that meeting were:
-Velocities coming out of storm sewer system are exceedingly high especially at the Eastern
storm system.
-UDSEWER modeling shows some errors, including above grade inlets, and stormwater at
above grade elevations.
(OVER)
Date: Z/9/ Signature:
CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT C('
COPIES OF REVISIONS: ❑ SITE C c,
LANDSCAP�cK
❑ UTILITY c(-;
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 281. NORTH COLLEGE P.O.8OX 580 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80522-0580
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (303)221-6750
0
Bridgefield PUD, Phase I and II - Final
Section 504 of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Building Code as
adopted by the City of Fort Collins requires that exterior walls of
one- and two-family dwellings located closer than 3 feet from a
property line be of one -hour fire -resistive construction. No
openings are allowed in such exterior walls. A parapet extending
30-inches above the roof surface is required unless the structure
complies with the exceptions to Section 1710. Projections, such as
cornices, eave overhangs or exterior balconies shall not extend
over the property line and must comply with UBC Sections 1711 and
504.
Sharon Getz
Building Inspection/221-6760
17. A phase line between Phases I & II should be shown on .the
plans.
18. The difference between the public and private streets must be
clearly defined on the plans.
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional
comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and
reviewing agencies continue to review this request. with your
consent, this item has been continued from the March Planning and
Zoning Board public hearing to the April Board public hearing.
Please be aware of the following dates and deadlines to assure your
ability to stay on schedule for the April 24, 1995 Board hearing:
******************************************************************
Plan revisions are due no later than the end of the working day,
April 5, 1995. Please contact me for the number of folded revisions
required for each document.
PMTIs, renderings, and 8 folded copies of final revisions (for the
Planning and Zoning Board packets) are due by 3:00 p.m. on April
17, 1995.
Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns
related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with
you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments.
si rely,
*eveOlt
Project Planner
xc: Kerrie Ashbeck
Stormwater Utility
Transportation
Parks & Recreation
file/Project Planner
6. The Poudre Fire Authority has indicated that an additional
fire hydrant will have to be located in the vicinity of Red
Fox Way and Bridgefield Drive that is capable of providing
1,000 gallons per minute, with 20 pounds per square inch
residual pressure, fire flows. Also, Deer Run Drive is already
in use in the PFA district and cannot be used as a street name
in this development.
7. The Mapping/Surveying Department has indicated that Deer Run,
Cottontail, and Racoon are street names already used in
Larimer County. This could be a problem for 911 dispatch. What
are the areas between the lots not marked as streets? They
must be designated as something. A red -lined copy of the
subdivision plat, with additional comments, has been forwarded
to Stewart & Associates.
8. The Light & Power Department has expressed a concern about
what are public streets and what are private drives. There are
street tree and utility coordination issues that still have to
be resolved.
9. The Landscape Plan must contain a general note calling for the
review and approval by. the City of any required irrigation
system for the landscape.
10. The pedestrian access to the natural area, at the southwest
corner of project, should be of a hard surface material to
meet the.ADA requirements.
11. The Natural Resources Division continues to negotiate with you
to acquire the Phase III portion of this property. The terms
of this agreement are still under discussion.
12. A copy of the comments received from the Stormwater Utility is
attached to this letter.
13. A red -lined copy of the utility plans, with comments from the
Water/Wastewater Department, has been forwarded to Stewart &
Associates. A red -lined copy of the Landscape Plan, with
water/wastewater comments, has been forwarded to Ripley
Associates.
14. A copy of the comments received from the City Forester is
attached to this letter.
15. The ditch companies for the Larimer County Canal No. 2 and the
New Mercer Ditch must be contacted by you to determine if
there are any concerns related to development along the
ditches.
16. The section of the New Mercer Ditch between the Bridgefield
P.U.D. and the Bridges P.U.D. should be labeled on the Site
and Landscape Plans.
Commuz Planning and Environmental S
Planning Department
February 23, 1995
Jon Prouty
Lagunitas Company
3307 South College
Fort Collins, CO.
Dear Jon,
Avenue, #200
80525
'ces
Staff has reviewed your documents for the Bridgefield P.U.D.,
Phases 1 & 2 - Final that were submitted to the City on January 23,
1995, and would like to offer the following comments:
1. The Post. Office has indicated that they would appreciate it if
you would select alternate names for the following streets due
to duplications with existing streets:.
a. Deer Run Drive
b. Red Fox Way
C. Bridgefield Drive could be a problem because there is•a
Bridgefield Drive on the approved Windtrail Park P.U.D.;
however, the developer of Windtrail has been asked to
change that street name in his project.
2. Public Service Company has indicated that the easement width
adjacent to the rights-of-way/drives needs to be such that the
distance from the back of walk to the rear line of the utility
easement is 13' minimum. No trees can be planted within 4' of
gas lines.
3. "Duplex". lots are really zero lot line single family
situations. A separate 'building permit will be required for
each unit, unless the individual lot is not sold with the
building. Then it can be a duplex.
4. A copy of the comments received from the Building inspection
Department is attached to this letter.
5. The Police Department has indicated that the streets Deer Run,
Red Fox, and Bridgefield need to be renamed because these
streets already exist (see Comment 1).
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750
FAX (303) 221-6378 TDD (303) 224-6002