HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNTRY CLUB FARMS - REZONING ..... 4/08/96 P & Z BOARD HEARING (CONTINUED ) - 7-95A - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES)
Planning and Zoning Board Minutes
April 8, 1996 Hearing
Page 28
COUNTRY CLUB FARMS REZONING. #7-95A
Member Gaveldon submitted a conflict of interest on this and left the hearing.
Mike Ludwig gave the staff report recommending approval of the rezoning request with
a P.U.D. condition.
Lucia Liley representing the applicant stated that she really did not have any comments
other than this was a request by the owner of the property. They have asked for a PUD
condition and would comply with what ever the City's requirements are.
PUBLIC INPUT
None.
Member Strom moved for approval of Country Club Farms Rezoning as
documented in the staff report.
Member Mickelsen seconded the motion.
The motion was approved 6-0.
OTHER BUSINESS
None.
The meeting was adjourned at 1:15 a.m.
0
•
Council Liaison: Gina Janett I Staff Liaison: Bob Blanchard
Chairperson: Lloyd Walker Phone: 491-6172 (W) 221-0489(H)
There was no Vice Chair elect at this hearing.
The meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m.
Roll Call: Colton, Bell, Davidson, Gaveldon, Mickelsen, Walker. Member Strom
arrived at 10:36 p.m.
Staff Present: Ludwig, Ashbeck, Olt, Shepard, Wamhoff, Duvall, Blanchard, and
Deines.
Agenda Review: Director Blanchard reviewed the continued Discussion Agenda, which
consisted of the following:
1.
#1-96
BMC West PUD - Preliminary and Final
2.
#2-96
University Centre PUD (University Mall) - Preliminary
3.
#21-95A
Prospect Park PUD - Final
4.
#50-95
Jefferson Commons PUD - Preliminary
S.
#7-95
Country Club Farms Rezoning
Mike Ludwig gave a staff presentation on the project, recommending approval with the
standard development agreement and final utility plan condition.
Linda Ripley, Ripley and Associates, representing BMC West gave a brief history of the
project and believed they had satisfied all 32 development criteria. Ms. Ripley stated
the issues to her are vague and asked for questions to be asked so she could address
them.
Member Davidson asked about the Prospect Streetscape Program, and he felt this
property fell within that area, Roman Numeral 11-1; and, that the business park style
should apply to all development improvements within the developed urban district from
Riverside Avenue to the Cache La Poudre River. He also referenced Appendix A.1 and
the statement regarding streetscapes. Member Davidson stated that he did not feel the
mandatory standards were being applied to this site.