HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNTRY CLUB FARMS - REZONING ..... MAY 7, 1996 CITY COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED TO MAY 21,1996 - 7-95A - REPORTS - SECOND READINGline of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 5 as bearing North 89 ° 11'26" West and
with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Commencing at the South Quarter
comer of said Section 5; thence along said South line of the Southwest Quarter North
89 ° 11'26" West 300.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along
said South line North 89' 1 F26" West 470.00 feet; thence North 00048'34" East
596.71 feet; thence North 89°11'26" West 146.00 feet; thence South 00°48'34" West
82.22 feet; thence North 89°11'26" West 254.00 feet; thence South 00°44'01" West
514.49 feet to said South line of the Southwest Quarter; thence along said South line
North 89 ° 11'26" West 1424.94 feet; thence North 00 °25'55" East 176.34 feet; thence
North 89°34'32" West 50.67 feet to the West line of said West Half of Section 5;
thence along said West line North 00°25'55" East 2957.41 feet to the centerline of
the Larimer and Weld Canal; thence along said centerline the following 11 courses
and distances:
1)
South 5203749"
East 492.00 feet;
2)
South 61 °45'49"
East 418.00 feet;
3)
South 70°34'49"
East 260.00 feet;
4)
South 6000449"
East 389.00 feet;
5)
South 53 04949"
East 176.30 feet;
6)
South 55 °57'32"
East 234.78 feet;
7)
South 63°35'57"
East 117.81 feet;
8)
South 83 °27'54"
East 187.84 feet;
9)
North 87'45' 11 "
East 295.91 feet;
10)
North 84033'09"
East 153.85 feet;
11)
North 74°26'45"
East 133.23 feet;
to the West line of that certain parcel of land as described at Reception No.
87068478, records of said County; thence along said West line the following four
courses and distances:
1) South 00°00'54" East 54.54 feet;
2) South 80"00'54" East 23.00 feet;
3) South 00000'54" East 72.00 feet;
4) South 45°00'54" East 70.71 feet
to the East line of said Southwest Quarter of Section 5; thence along said East line
South 00°00'54" East 1666.00 feet to a point of 300.00 feet North of said South
Quarter comer of Section 5; thence parallel with said south line of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 5 North 89' 11'26" West 300.00 feet; thence parallel with said
East line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5 South 00°00'54" East 300.00 feet to
the True Point of Beginning. Containing 140.094 acres more or less.
Section 2. That the Sign District Map adopted pursuant to Section 29-593.1 of the Code
of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, changed and amended by showing that the
above -described property is included in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District.
OPTION A
ORDINANCE NO. 52, 1996
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FOR THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN
AS THE COUNTRY CLUB FARMS
WHEREAS, Section 29-423 of the City Code provides that the owner of any property in the
"T" Transition Zoning District may at any time petition the City to remove such property from said
zoning district and place it in another zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the owner of certain real property described in Section 1 of this Ordinance has
petitioned the City to rezone said property from the "T" Transition Zoning District into the RLP
Zoning District, with a P.U.D. condition; and
WHEREAS, on April 8, 1996, the foregoing zoning request was reviewed by the Planning
and Zoning Board as required by the City Code; and
WHEREAS, at public hearings on April 16, 1996, and May 7, 1996, the City Council
considered evidence and received recommendations from City staff and the Planning and Zoning
Board with regard to said rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be in the best interests of the City
to place the foregoing property in the "I-L" Zoning District and that such rezoning would be
consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and with Policy Nos. 3a,
19, 39, 60 and 61 of the City's Land Use Policies Plan; and
WHEREAS, attaching a condition that said property he developed as a planned unit
development would allow for the residential development of said property, as well as other land uses,
so long as the provisions of the City's Land Development Guidance System were met with regard
to any such land use proposal; and
WHEREAS, Section 2945 of the City Code provides that the City Council may impose
reasonable conditions on zoning and rezoning designations which relate to the use of the subject
property in order to preserve and promote the public health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of
the City and the public generally, and to encourage and facilitate the orderly development of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS:
Section 1. That the Zoning District Map adopted by Chapter 29 of the Code of the City
of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by changing the zoning classification from "T,"
Transition Zoning District, to "I-L," Limited Industrial Zoning District, for the following described
real property in the City known as the Country Club Farms:
That portion of the West Half of Section 5, Township 7 North, Range 68 West of the
6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, described as follows: Considering the South
5 1 7M NUMBER: 35
#41 The City should encourage residential development in the northeast......
#75 Residential areas should provide for a mix of housing densities.
#78 Residential development should be directed into areas which reinforce the phasing
plan in the urban growth area.
#80b Higher density residential uses should locate within close proximity to community
or neighborhood park facilities.
C#80c Higher density residential uses should locate where water and sewer facilities can be
adequately provided.
#80 High
er density residential uses should locate within easy access to major employment
centers:
�Oe ; Higher density residential uses should locate with access to public transportation.
In addition, the following statements from the adopted Community Vision and Goals 2015 document
could be used to support a condition requiring a minimum overall average density of greater than 3
dwelling units per acre:
Our City will develop in a form that makes comprehensive, convenient, and efficient transit
service possible.
Our neighborhoods will include a variety of housing types to support a diverse population
and allow people of different ages, cultures, races and incomes to live in each neighborhood.
Our neighborhoods will have the environment, amenities, mix of uses, and housing attributes
to support a diverse population.
Fort Collins will promote development of well -designed, compatible, high -quality multi-
family developments and accessory homes throughout the community.
Finally, 6 dwelling units per acre is the maximum allowable density for a Planned Unit Development
(P.U.D.) which achieves the minimum sixty percentage points as required by Criteria 1 of the
Residential Uses Point Chart of the Land Development Guidance System (LDGS).
According to Section 29-423 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins, the City Council must change
the zoning of a property in the "T" Zone to another zoning district within 60 days from the date the
matter is considered by the Planning and Zoning Board. Therefore, the property must be rezoned by
June 7, 1996.
DATE: May 7, 1996
4 1 :M NUMBER: 35
If residential development is proposed on the property, the Residential Uses Point Chart of the
LDGS will be used to determine the maximum allowable density for the site. Criterion I of the
Residential Uses Point Chart requires all residential P.U.D.'s of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre to
achieve a minimum of 60 points on Density Chart H. Criterion 2 of the Residential Uses Point Chart
requires a project to earn at least 40 of the minimum 60 points from base points. If the applicant
proposes a density higher than 6 dwelling units per acre, they must achieve more points on the
residential uses point chart. The single, P.U.D. condition will guarantee that any residential
development of the property will have a minimum overall average density between 3 and 6 dwelling
units per acre. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Option A.
Option B:
Option B of Ordinance No. 52, 1996 will also place the property in the I-L, Light Industrial District
with a P.U.D. condition. In addition, it will require any residential development on the property to
have a minimum overall average density of 6 dwelling units per acre. Adoption of a condition
regarding minimum overall average residential density may not be superseded by a Planned Unit
Development (PUD). Mayor Pro -Tern Janett stated the additional condition is supported by the fact
that the property is located at the corner of two -arterials and will have transit service in the future.
While placing a minimum overall average residential density condition on the property is an option,
several factors should be considered:
All Development Criterion A-1.12 "Residential Density" of the L.D.G.S. already requires
an overall average residential density of at least 3 dwelling units per acre.
2. Site characteristics which may limit the development potential have not been inventoried or
analyzed. Overall average residential density calculations are based on gross acreage of a
development site including any constraining features. If the constraining features are
substantial, the iqt residential density (calculated using only developable land) could be
significant in order to meet the minimum overall average density. (Example: If 50% of the
site is constrained by wetlands and the overall average residential density minimum is 6
dwelling units per acre, the net density may be 12 dwelling units per acre.)
3. A condition requiring a minimum overall average density of greater than 3 dwelling units per
acre further limits opportunities for a developer, City Staff, the Planning and Zoning Board,
or City Council to flexibly respond to neighborhood concerns regarding compatibility.
4. Staff is not aware of any previous rezoning actions by the City Council that have included
a condition requiring a minimum overall average density of greater than 3 dwelling units per
acre (maximums, yes, but no minimums).
The additional condition requiring a minimum overall average residential density of greater than 3
dwelling units per acre could be supported by the following policies of the Land Use Policies Plan:
#3d The City shall promote the location of residential development which is close to
employment, recreation, and shopping facilities.
#12 Urban density residential development usually at three or more units to the acre
should be encouraged in the urban growth area.
DATE: May 7, 1996
3 1 :M NUMBER: 35
to the permitted land uses of the underlying zoning district, I-L zoning is in conformance with a
number of policies contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Some examples from the City's
Comprehensive Plan are as follows:
From the Goals and Objectives document:
Promote increased development in the north and northeastern areas of the City.
Provide a rational pattern of land use for the older parts of the City which promotes the
integrated redevelopment and development of business, industrial, and residential areas in
the northern and northeastern areas of the City.
Encourage residential, commercial, and industrial development in the northeastern area of
Fort Collins in a manner conducive to the desirable redevelopment of North College Avenue
and the Central City, especially downtown.
The above themes are repeated in the following policies from the Land Use Policies Plan:
#3a The City shall promote maximum utilization of land within the City.
#19 The City shall establish a project impact system as a growth management tool which
would cover:
a. Positive and negative environmental impacts;
b. Positive and negative social impacts:
C. Positive and negative economical/fiscal impacts;
d. Positive and negative impacts on public services and facilities, including
transportation.
(Note: Regardless of the underlying zoning, the P.U.D. condition will require any
proposed land use to be evaluated against the LDGS which is the City's "project
impact system".)
#39 The City should direct efforts to promote improved traffic and pedestrian circulation
and public transit to areas north and northeast of the City.
(Note: The Transit Development Plan suggests that transit should follow
development. Any proposed development on the site would be required to make
improvements to traffic and pedestrian circulation and would generate a need for
transit.)
#60 Industrial uses should locate near transportation facilities that offer the required
access to the industry but will not be allowed to create demands which exceed the
capacity of the existing and future transportation network of the City.
#61 Industrial development should locate within the City or consistent with the phasing
plan for the urban growth area, where the proper sizing of facilities such as water,
sewer and transportation has occurred or is planned.
DATE: May 7, 1996
2 1 'EM NUMBER: 35
BACKGROUND:
The current zoning and existing land uses of surrounding properties are as follows:
N: r-l-p; undeveloped.
b-p; undeveloped.
S: I, Industrial (County); industrial uses, railroad yard.
O, Open (County); existing mobile home park (Collins Aire Mobile Home Park).
MM (City); undeveloped.
E: FA-1; Plummer School, farming, undeveloped.
W: FA-1; farming, undeveloped.
t; undeveloped.
This property was annexed into the City as part of the East Vine Drive 6th Annexation on August
2, 1983 and the East Vine Drive 7th Annexation on August 16, 1983 and was placed in the T,
Transition zoning district.
The T, Transition Zone is for properties which are in a transitional stage with regard to ultimate
development. No development is allowed to occur in the "T" Zone. The only uses permitted on
properties in the "T" zone are those uses that existed on the date the property was placed into the
district.
The applicant, Vaught -Frye Architects, on behalf of the owner, Country Club Farms, L.L.C., filed
a rezoning petition with the City Clerk on February 29, 1996. The petitioner requested that the City
rezone approximately 140.1 acres located north of East Vine Drive and west of Summit View Drive
from the T, Transition Zoning District to the R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential Zoning
District with a P.U.D. condition. The applicant stated in the rezoning justification that "This request
is to simply prepare the site for development and is not indicative of any specific land use." Staff
and the Planning and Zoning Board recommended that the property be rezoned to the R-L-P, Low
Density Planned Residential Zoning District with a P.U.D. condition.
On April 16, 1996, the City Council voted 5-2 to approve Ordinance No. 52, 1996 as amended on
First Reading to rezone the property from the T, Transition District to the I-L, Light Industrial
District with a P.U.D. In addition, Mayor Pro-Tem Janett requested that staff research the potential
of placing an additional condition on the zoning which requires any residential development on this
property to have some minimum overall average density greater than 3 dwelling units per acre. In
response staff has prepared two options to Ordinance No. 52, 1996.
Option A of Ordinance No. 52, 1996 will place the property in the I-L, Light Industrial District with
a P.U.D. condition. This single condition will require any proposed development of the property to
be submitted as a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) subject to the requirements of the Land
Development Guidance System (LDGS). While a P.U.D. condition does not restrict development
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: 35
DATE: May 7, 1996
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Mike Ludwig
SUBJECT:
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 52, 1996, Rezoning Approximately 140.1 Acres from the T,
Transition District to the I-L, Light Industrial District with a P.U.D. Condition. This Rezoning Is
Known as the Country Club Farms Rezoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading (Option A). rbPTlow� A DENtEp
y3
rAmt1 0 TD R6�ANS
Ac�v�ro l -D
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: -gyp C��L�Iac�
—1— c
On April 16, 1996, the City/Council voted 5-2 to approve Ordinance No. 52, 1996 as amended on
First Reading to rezone e property from the T, Transition District to the I-L, Light Industrial
District with a P.U.D. condition. In addition, Mayor Pro-Tem Janett requested that staff research
the potential of placing an additional condition on the zoning which requires any residential
development on this property to have some minimum overall average density of greater than 3
dwelling units per acre. Staff has prepared two options for Ordinance No. 52, 1996. Option A of
Ordinance No. 52, 1996 will only place a P.U.D. condition on the I-L zoning. Option B of
Ordinance No. 52. 1996 will place a P.U.D. condition and a condition requiring a minimum overall
average residential density of 6 dwelling units per acre on the I-L Zoning. The adoption of either
option of Ordinance No. 52. 1996 does not grant any land use approval for this property. The P.U.D.
condition will require any development proposal on this property to be submitted as a Planned Unit
Development subject to the requirements of the Land Development Guidance System (LDGS).
Adoption of a condition regarding a minimum overall average residential density of 6 dwelling units
per acre (Option B) may not be superseded by a Planned Unit Development (PUD). According to
Section 29-423 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins. the City Council must change the zoning of
a property in the T zone to another zoning district within 60 days from the date the matter is
considered by the Planning and Zoning Board. Therefore, the property must be rezoned by June 7,
1996.
APPLICANT: Vaught -Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
ONNWER: Country Club Farms, L.L.C.
c/o Vaught -Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
DATE: April 16, 1996
4
EM NUMBER: 27 '
(Note: See above reference to Section 29-146 of the City Code for the definition of
the R-L-P zoning district. In addition, the P.U.D. process will allow the potential for
a range of residential densities.)
#78 Residential development should be directed into areas which reinforce the phasing
plan in the urban growth area.
(Note: The property is already annexed into the City and is not located in the UGA.)
#79b Low density residential uses should locate in areas which have easy access to major
employment centers.
#79d Low density residential uses should locate in areas within walking distance to an
existing or planned neighborhood park and within easy access to a community park.
Policies from the Land Use Policies Plan that do not support residential zoning are as follows:
#50 Mass transit should be used as a tool which leads development patterns, rather than
following growth.
(Note: TDP reflects opposite opinion.)
#79c Low density residential uses should locate in areas within walking distance to an
existing or planned elementary school.
Staff feels that the requested R-L-P, Low -Density Planned Residential Zoning with a P.U.D.
condition is in general conformance with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. On April
8, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Board voted 6-0 to recommend R-L-P, Low Density Planned
Residential Zoning. According to City Code Section 29-423, the City Council must change the
zoning of a property in the "T" Zone to another zoning district within 60 days from the date the
matter is considered by the Planning and Zoning Board. Therefore, the property must be rezoned by
June 8, 1996.
N
DATE. .April 16, 1996 I 3 I l M NUMBER: 27
From the Goals and Objectives document:
• Promote increased development in the north and northeastern areas of the City.
• Encourage increased residential development of the northeastern area in order to
support and direct the redevelopment of the area.
• Encourage residential, commercial, and industrial development in the northeastern
area of Fort Collins in a manner conducive to the desirable redevelopment of North
College Avenue and the Central City, especially downtown.
The above themes are repeated in the following policies from the Land Use Policies Plan:
#3a The City shall promote maximum utilization of land within the City.
#3d The City shall promote the location of residential development which is close to
employment, recreation, and shopping facilities.
#12 Urban density residential development usually at three or more units to the acre
should be encouraged in the urban growth area.
# 19 The City shall establish a project impact system as a growth management tool which
would cover:
a. Positive and negative environmental impacts;
b. Positive and negative social impacts;
C. Positive and negative economical fiscal impacts;
d. Positive and negative impacts on public services and facilities, including
transportation.
(Note: Regardless of the underlying zoning, the P.U.D. condition will require any
proposed land use to be evaluated against the LDGS which is the City's "project
impact system".)
#39 The City should direct efforts to promote improved traffic and pedestrian circulation
and public transit to areas north and northeast of the City.
(Note: The Transit Development Plan ("TDP") suggests that transit should follow
development. Any proposed development on the site would be required to make
improvements to traffic and pedestrian circulation and would generate a need for
transit.)
#41 The City should encourage residential development in the northeast......
#75 Residential areas should provide for a mix of housing densities.
DATE: April 16, 1996
2 I cM NUMBER: 27
I-L, Light Industrial zoning district with a P.U.D. condition. However, the rezoning petition was
withdrawn by the previous applicant prior to second reading of the ordinance. Therefore, the
property remains zoned T, Transition.
The current zoning and existing land uses of surrounding properties are as follows:
N: r-1-p; undeveloped.
b-p; undeveloped.
S: I, Industrial (County); industrial uses, railroad yard.
O, Open (County); existing mobile home park (Collins Aire Mobile Home Park).
MM (City); undeveloped.
E: FA-1; Plummer School, farming, undeveloped.
W: FA-1; farming, undeveloped.
t; undeveloped.
This property was annexed into the City as part of the East Vine Drive 61h Annexation on August
2, 1983 and the East Vine Drive 7th Annexation on August 16, 1983 and was placed in the T,
Transition zoning district.
The T, Transition Zone is for properties which are in a transitional stage with regard to ultimate
development. No development is allowed to occur in the "T" Zone. The only uses permitted on
properties in the "T" zone are those uses that existed on the date the property was placed into the
district.
The applicant, Vaught -Frye Architects, on behalf of the owner, Country Club Farms, L.L.C., filed
a rezoning petition with the City Clerk on February 29, 1996.
The petitioner requests that the City rezone approximately 140.1 acres located north of East Vine
Drive and west of Summit View Drive from the T, Transition Zoning District to the R-L-P, Low
Density Planned Residential Zoning District with a P.U.D. condition. The applicant states in the
rezoning justification that "This request is to simply prepare the site for development and is not
indicative of any specific land use."
Section 29-146 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins states: "The R-L-P Low Density Planned
Residential District is for areas planned as a unit to provide variation in use, density and building
placement." The requested P.U.D. condition would require any development proposal for this
property to be reviewed against the criteria of the Land Development Guidance System and permit
any land use to be proposed regardless of the underlying zoning (although given the request for
residential zoning, the assumption is that a residential project will be proposed).
The requested R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential Zoning with a P.U.D. condition is in
conformance with a number of policies contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Some examples
from the City's Comprehensive Plan are as follows:
AGENDA ITEM '%UMMARY ITEM , JMBER: 27
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL DATE: April 16, 1996STAFF•
Mike Ludwig
SUBJECT: 0 co I PD
1)V%
Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 52, 1996, Rezoning Approximately 140.1 Acres from
the T, Transition District to the R-UP, Planned Residential District with a P.U.D. Condition. This
Rezoning Is Known as the Country Club Farms Rezoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading. On April 8,1996, the Planning and
Zoning Board voted 6-0 to recommend, R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential Zoning.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request to rezone approximately 140.1 acres located north of East Vine Drive and west of
Summit View Drive from the T, Transition Zoning District to the R-L-P, Low Density Planned
Residential Zoning District with a P.U.D. condition. The request is in general conformance with the
policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The adoption of this Ordinance does not grant any land
use approval for the property. The P.U.D. condition will require any development proposal on this
property to be submitted as a Planned Unit Development subject to the requirements of the Land
Development Guidance System (LDGS). Therefore, this proposed zoning does not guarantee that
the property will be developed in the future as a residential development. According to Section 29-
423 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins, the City Council must change the zoning of a property
in the T zone to another zoning district within 60 days from the date the matter is considered by the
Planning and Zoning Board. Therefore, the property must be rezoned by June 8, 1996.
APPLICANT: Vaught -Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
OWNER: Country Club Farms, L.L.C.
c/o Vaught -Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80525
]BACKGROUND:
A previous petition for rezoning of this property by Summitview Properties (no relation to Country
Club Farms, L.L.C.) requested R-P, Planned Residential zoning with a P.U.D. condition. On March
27, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended to the City Council that the property be
zoned 1-L, Light Industrial with a P.U.D. condition. The Board also recommended that the City
Council consider the noise impacts of the Fort Collins Airpark on the development of the property.
The City Council approved, on first reading, an ordinance that would have placed the property in the
2) South 80°00'54" East 23.00 feet;
3) South 00°00'54" East 72.00 feet;
4) South 45000'54" East 70.71 feet
to the East line of said Southwest Quarter of Section 5; thence along said East line
South 00°00'54" East 1666.00 feet to a point of 300.00 feet North of said South
Quarter corner of Section 5; thence parallel with said south line of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 5 North 89011'26" West 300.00 feet; thence parallel with said
East line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5 South 00000'54" East 300.00 feet to
the True Point of Beginning. Containing 140.094 acres more or less.
Section 2. That the Sign District Map adopted pursuant to Section 29-593.1 of the Code
of the City of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, changed and amended by showing that the
above -described property is included in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District.
Section 3. That the zoning granted herein is expressly conditioned upon the entire
above -described real property being developed as a planned unit development in accordance with
the ordinances of the City and that any residential development on said property be at a minimum
overall average density of six (6) units per acre.
Section 4. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to amend said Zoning
District Map in accordance with this Ordinance.
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 16th day of
April, A.D. 1996, and to be presented for final passage on the 7th day of May, A.D. 1996.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Passed and adopted on final reading this 7th day of May, A.D. 1996
Mayor
I,tiMt*w
City Clerk
WHEREAS, Section 29-45 of the City Code provides that the City Council may impose
reasonable conditions on zoning and rezoning designations which relate to the use of the subject
property in order to preserve and promote the public health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of
the City and the public generally, and to encourage and facilitate the orderly development of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS:
Section 1. That the Zoning District Map adopted by Chapter 29 of the Code of the City
of Fort Collins be, and the same hereby is, amended by changing the zoning classification from "T,"
Transition Zoning District, to "I-L," Limited Industrial Zoning District, for the following described
real property in the City known as the Country Club Farms:
That portion of the West Half of Section 5, Township 7 North, Range 68 West of the
6th P.M., Larimer County, Colorado, described as follows: Considering the South
line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 5 as bearing North 89° 11'26" West and
with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Commencing at the South Quarter
corner of said Section 5; thence along said South line of the Southwest Quarter North
89° 11'26" West 300.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along
said South line North 89°11'26" West 470.00 feet; thence North 00048'34" East
596.71 feet; thence North 89011'26" West 146.00 feet; thence South 00°48'34" West
82.22 feet; thence North 89011'26" West 254.00 feet; thence South 00°44'01" West
514.49 feet to said South line of the Southwest Quarter; thence along said South line
North 89° 11'26" West 1424.94 feet; thence North 00025'55" East 176.34 feet; thence
North 89°34'32" West 50.67 feet to the West line of said West Half of Section 5;
thence along said West line North 00°25'55" East 2957.41 feet to the centerline of
the Larimer and Weld Canal; thence along said centerline the following 11 courses
and distances:
1)
South 52°37'49"
East 492.00 feet;
2)
South 61 °45'49"
East 418.00 feet;
3)
South 70°34'49"
East 260.00 feet;
4)
South 60°04'49"
East 389.00 feet;
5)
South 53 °49'49"
East 176.30 feet;
6)
South 55°57'32"
East 234.78 feet;
7)
South 63°35'57"
East 117.81 feet;
8)
South 83 °27'54"
East 187.84 feet;
9)
North 87 °45' 11 "
East 295.91 feet;
10)
North 84°33'09"
East 153.85 feet;
11)
North 74°26'45"
East 133.23 feet;
to the West line of that certain parcel of land as described at Reception No.
87068478, records of said County; thence along said West line the following four
courses and distances:
1) South 00°00'54" East 54.54 feet;
OPTION B
ORDINANCE NO. 52, 1996
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE
CITY OF FORT COLLINS BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FOR THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN
AS THE COUNTRY CLUB FARMS
WHEREAS, Section 29-423 of the City Code provides that the owner of any property in the
"T" Transition Zoning District may at any time petition the City to remove such property from said
zoning district and place it in another zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the owner of certain real property described in Section 1 of this Ordinance has
petitioned the City to rezone said property from the "T' Transition Zoning District into the RLP
Zoning District, with a P.U.D. condition; and
WHEREAS, on April 8, 1996, the foregoing zoning request was reviewed by the Planning
and Zoning Board as required by the City Code; and
WHEREAS, at a public hearings on April 16, 1996 and May 7, 1996, the City Council
considered evidence and received recommendations from City staff and the Planning and Zoning
Board with regard to said rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be in the best interests of the City
to place the foregoing property in the "I-L" Zoning District and that such rezoning would be
consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and with Policy Nos. 3a,
19, 39, 60 and 61 of the City's Land Use Policies Plan; and
WHEREAS, attaching a condition that said property be developed as a planned unit
development would allow for the residential development of said property, as well as other land uses,
so long as the provisions of the City's Land Development Guidance System were met with regard
to any such land use proposal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also believes that it would be in the best interests of the City
to attach an additional condition to the zoning of said property so that any residential use thereon
would have a minimum overall average density of six (6)-dwelling units per acre; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that this additional condition is necessary and in the
best interests of the City to satisfy Land Use Policy Nos. 3d, 12, 41, 75, 78, 80b, 80c, 80d, and 80e
of the City's Land Use Policies Plan; and
WHEREAS, requiring any residential development on the said property to be at a minimum
overall average density of six (6) dwelling units per acre is consistent with Criterion 1 of the
Residential Use Point Chart of the City's Land Development Guidance System, which requires a
minimum of sixty (60) percentage points for any residential development of six (6) or fewer dwelling
units per acre; and
Section 3. That the zoning granted herein is expressly conditioned upon the entire
above -described real property being developed as a planned unit development in accordance with
the ordinances of the City.
Section 4. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to amend said Zoning
District Map in accordance with this Ordinance.
Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 16th day of
April, A.D. 1996, and to be presented for final passage on the 7th day of May, A.D. 1996.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Passed and adopted on final reading this 7th day of May, A.D. 1996.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk