The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGLENMOOR P.U.D, 2ND & 3RD FILING - PRELIMINARY / FINAL - 8-95C - CORRESPONDENCE -with 90 degree angles on Plum Channel. e) Address water quality issues in the channel and wetland treatment is a possibility. Please contact Basil Hamdan at 221-6035 if you have questions about these comments. 3. The Light and Power offered the following comments:. a) The normal development charges will apply. Please contact Doug Martine at 221-6152 if you have questions about these comments. ` 4. The Water and Wastewater Departments offered the following comments: a) The developer must evaluate the extension of sanitary sewer from Glenmoor on the north or from Taft rather than through the easement at the south side of the site. Due to the number of units in this project, it is desirable to loop the water main from Glenmoor back t the main in Taft; however, this may be dependent upon the cross-section on the Plum Creek channel adjacent to Taft. b) The water conservation standards for landscape and irrigation will apply to the project. c) Plant investment fees and water rights will be due at time of building permit, Please contact Roger Buffington at 221-6854 if you have questions about these comments. 5. The Poudre Fire Authority offered the following comments: a) The street widths and location of fire hydrants must meet requirements. b) We are beginning to require fire extinguisher units in each unit. Please contact Roger Frasco at 221-6570 if you have any questions about these comments. 7. The Engineering Department offered the following comments: a) The ROW on Taft Hill is 57'/z now rather than 50'. Add a 15' utility easement. (Check with the utility companies for possible conflicts with Plum Creek). b) Under the new Land Use Code (in effect March 28) you will have to submit a project development plan. The project development plan will generally specify the uses of land, the layout of landscaping, circulation, architectural elevations, and building and preliminary plat. The PDP is more specific than the Preliminary submittals for the LDGS. c) Density is no longer calculated on a gross acreage basis. The new Land Use Code calculates density on a net basis. This is relevant as it might increase the overall density of the project. The minimum density in the MMN district is 12 du/acre (calculated on a net acre of residential land). d) In the MMN district, any on -street parking within or immediately adjacent to the site can be counted toward the parking requirement of the subject use. For each two-family and multi -family dwelling, the following table identifies the number of parking spaces. Number of bedrooms/dwelling unit Parking spaces per dwelling unit One or less 1.5 Two 1.75 Three 2.0 Four and above 2.5 e) Attached and multi -family dwellings which face a second street or connecting walkway are exempt from subsection (1) through (4) of Article 3, Section 5, E Garage Doors, of the Land Use Code. However, the facade oriented to the second street or walkway spine shall include windows, doorways, and a structured transition from public to private areas using built environments such as porch features, pediments, arbors, low walls, fences, trellis work, and/or similar elements integrated with plantings. f) You may choose to submit both Project Development Plan and Final Plan concurrently. Please contact Leanne Lawrie at 221-6750 if you have questions about these comments. b) Street oversizing fee for this is $895 per unit for attached housing on separate lots. c) Improvements will be required along Taft Hill including detached sidewalks (like the ones to the north). Check the current street standards. . d) The internal street will need to be done according to the new street standards (30' wide). e) We would like to see the cul-de-sacs pulled in to allow more land to be built upon. f) If the street is .extended, may require an offsite easement (construction and grading for access from adjoining property). g) Detached sidewalks along Glenmoor Drive will be required. h) Overlay Glenmoor so that it is equal to or better than condition. Please contact Mike Herzig at 221-6750 if you have questions .about these comments. 8. Traffic Operations noted that you will have to submit a Traffic Impact Analysis. Contact Eric Bracke at 221-6062 for details on what this includes. 9. The Natural Resources Department offered the following comments: a) We will need to schedule a time to meet and review any wetlands disturbance. (This is to be done in the field.) b) It is recommended to design the new channel in a natural fashion so that it is not too heavily manicured. c) You will need to submit an erosion control plan for fugitive dust emissions and soil erosion. d) It is recommended that trash collection is curbside and that a provision is placed in the homeowner's association that people use the same trash hauler. There is a city requirement for recycling for anything less than eight units. e) Is there a possible easement through Glenmoor Drive PUD to allow for pedestrian and bicycle access? What about crossing Plum Creek to Taft Hill Road for such access? Please contact Susie Gordon at 221-6265 if you have questions about these comments. 10. The Current Planning Department offers these following comments: a) You will need to submit an A.P.O. (a list of affected property owners) for notification of affected owners with 500' of the property. y � r MEETING DATE: March 17, 1997 ITEM: Glenmoor PUD 2"d and 3' Filing APPLICANT: Dick Rutherford Stewart and Associates 103 South Meldrum Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 LAND USE DATA: Request for 43 single-family townhomes, with the following breakdown: 9 structures consisting of four units, one structure with three units, and two structures with two units each, located on 4.52 acres. These units are intended to be the same as the twenty single-family townhomes to the north. COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Department offered the following comments: a) The property is in the MMN-Medium Density Mixed Used —zoning district. The use is a permitted use and is a type 1, administrative review. Please contact Gary Lopez at 221-6760 if you have questions about these comments. 2. The Stormwater Utility offered the following comments: a) This site is located within the canal improvement basin where fees are $6,181/acre and it is subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. b) The standard drainage and erosion control reports will need to be submitted. c) It was suggested that you review the Plum Channel update (as part of the Glenmoor PUD) for the design of the channel. d) Need to show that the 129 year event can be contained in this channel /FO Commur. Planning and Environmental vices Current Planning City of Fort Collins March 21, 1997 Dick Rutherford Stewart and Associates 103 South Meldrum Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 RE: Conceptual Review Comments Dear Mr. Rutherford: For your information, attached is a copy of the Staffs comments Glenmoor PUD, 2"6 and 3' Filing which was presented before the Conceptual Review Team on March 17, 1997. The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project. If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6750. Sincerely, Leanne Lawrie 8A) Project Planner xc: Eric Bracke Stormwater Utility/Glen Schlueter Project Planner File 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 FAX (970) 221-6378 • TDD (970) 224-6002