HomeMy WebLinkAboutST. ELIZABETH ANN SETON CHURCH EXPANSION - MAJOR AMENDMENT - MJA170001 - CORRESPONDENCE -08/01/2017: Where did these marked easements come from? Dedicated by
separate document? See redlines.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: The titles on the sheet 2 do not match. See redlines.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: Where did these marked easements come from? Dedicated by
separate document? See redlines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: Please revise the legal description as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ryan Boehle, 970-416-24017 rboehle@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/2017
10/04/2017: No comments. Thank you.
requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of
Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials
Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan
(Based upon returned redlines), an Erosion Control Report (that meet the
Erosion Control Criteria please see the returned criteria sheet), and an Escrow
/ Security Calculation (Was not included). If you need clarification concerning the
erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse
Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icountv@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: Please provide the following information for the Benchmark
Statement in the EXACT format shown below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL
DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29
UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE,
THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED
= NAVD88 - X.XX�.
Comment Number: 10
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 11
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 4
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
08/01/2017: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 5
10/05/2017: This will be reviewed at the next round of review.
Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
09/25/2017: The Utility Plan, Grading Plan, Site Plan and Landscape Plans all
include the existing easements with text that includes 'by separate document"
which is confusing because that leads me to question if the easement is
existing or yet to be dedicated. Please either remove the'BSY text or include
the reception number for these various existing easements.
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
09/25/2017: There is a note on the Grading Plan that states that an underdrain
may be required after soil investigation ... Please note that we will either require
that the geotechnical recommendation be included in the drainage report prior
to plan and report approval, or we will require that the underdrain be included in
the design plans. In addition, typically, the outfall system for rain gardens
includes an underdrain that drains to an area inlet box (with the rim set 12"
above the rain garden bottom) that outfalls through a pipe to the detention basin.
We have found that "overtopping" designs for rain gardens tend to result in
erosion problems with vegetation establishment issues and we discourage this
type of design.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
09/25/2017: Please note that the proposed drainage easement will need to be
submitted, reviewed and approved as a part of this development application.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
09/25/2017: All other comments have been adequately addressed. Thank you.
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, Ischlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 07/20/2017
09/26/2017: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet
requirements. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design
Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. a copy of
the erosion control requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/eroison. The
Erosion Control Materials will need to be submitted at time of the first round of
FDP. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received
materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet
City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report as the recently
received materials has comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to
meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security
Calculation as the recently received materials has comments and redlines, that
needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria and as a result have changed the
Erosion Control Plans and would require a recalculation of the Escrow. The site
disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft. and therefore Erosion and Sediment Control
Materials need to be submitted. Based upon the area of disturbance, State
permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre and should
be pulled before Construction Activities begin. Erosion Control Materials will
need to be produced, reviewed, and accepted to meet City Erosion Control
Criteria before Development Agreement Language can be drafted. If you need
clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or
Comments presented above please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970)
224-6015 jschlam@fcgov.com
07/20/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft., therefore Erosion and
Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted. The erosion control
plans to indicate the limits of rollover curbing.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/01/2017
10/01/2017: SIGN LOCATION
East Plaza: Fire lane sign will need to be relocated at the edge of the fire lane.
East & West Plaza: Fire lane sign should better indicate that the plaza is
designed to accommodate fire apparatus. Rather than "Fire Lane No Parking",
please modify signs to read, "Fire Lane - Weight Limit 40 Tons on Plaza
Surface'.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-60459 cfrickey@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/03/2017
10/03/2017: Please provide staff with digital copies of a photosimulation
showing what the church addition looks like from the neighborhoods to the north
and east of the church site. These images will help the discussion about
building height at the hearing and will assist with assessing any impacts the
addition might have on the neighborhoods.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
08/01/2017: It looks like the new concrete fire lane will impact some existing
trees. Please meet with our Forestry department to determine a mitigation value
for these trees and mitigate for the loss of these trees on -site.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
10/03/2017: Repeat comment. This comment must be addressed before
hearing.
08/01/2017: How is the site handling bicycle parking? There should be one
space per 3,000 sq. ft. Please show this on the site plan and add a bicycle
parking section to the parking table.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Heather McDowell, 970-224-6065, hmcdowell@fcgov.com
Topic: Drainage Report
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
09/25/2017: Please note in the drainage report that the rain garden has not
been sized to include the future parking or impervious areas. It is fine if your
design does not include these future areas, but they will have to provide LID in
the future. I would recommend that you consider building those areas into your
LID calculations and design now to potentially alleviate or eliminate the need for
additional LID in the future.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
09/25/2017: Please see the redlined report and plans for minor comments.
Topic: General
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
pre -submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans,
floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy,
square footage and type of construction being proposed.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 08/09/2017
08/09/2017: The allowable building height for a type VA building, A occupancy
is 70 feet above. The top of the roof structure (not including the cross/steeple) is
73 feet above the average grade. The roof structure must be lowered to 70 feet
above average grade.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
09/25/2017:
08/01/2017: Light & Powers existing electric facilities look to be clear of the
new addition. Field locate and verify the existing primary on the South side will
not be in conflict with the new addition.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
08/01/2017: Any relocation or modification to existing electric facilities will be
at the expense of the owner/developer.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
08/01/2017: Any proposed Light & Power electric facilities or existing electric
facilities that will remain within the limits of the project must be located within a
utility easement.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
08/01/2017: Does the applicant anticipate any change to the existing electric
service?
If yes, a C-1 Form and a One -line diagram will need to be submitted to Light &
Power Engineering. A link to the C-1 form is below:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-fo
rms-guidelines-regulations
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
08/01/2017: Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges, and any system
modification charges necessary will apply to this development. Please contact
Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970-221-6700. Please
reference our Electric Service Standards, development charges and fee
estimator at the following link:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, ilynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/01/2017
08/01/2017: ROLLOVER CURBS
The transitional fire lanes may incorporate roll over curbing onto the east plaza
or entry to the west drive. No vertical curbing will be a permitted. Please update
likely need to be rebuilt. I'd suggest contacting our Inspection Manager, Steve
Cicione at 970 692-4418 to schedule a site visit to discuss the drive approach
and potentially then update the plans as a result.
07/27/2017: In addition to the access ramps at public street intersections, the
two driveway approaches onto Seton Street and one driveway approach onto
Southridge Greens Boulevard would need to be be re -built with City/ADA
compliance utilizing LCUASS designs such as 706.1 or 706.3 for the eastern
driveway out to Seton Street and the driveway out to Southridge Green
Boulevard, and 707.2 for the western driveway out to Seton Street. Note that
City Streets will not upgrade these crossings as part of their concrete repair
work.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 07/27/2017
10/03/2017: Among the "etc." items from the submittal requirements for the civil
drawings, please also have added the affirmation statement item I.J. in
Appendix E-4 of LCUASS.
07/27/2017: Additional information on the civil set as part of our submittal
requirements (General Notes, Construction Notes, Indemnification Statement
etc.) is required.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Molly Roche, mroche@fc oq v.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1
09/25/2017:
Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
It appears as though some trees may be impacted by the new fire lane. Please
address and discuss feasibility of retaining trees on -site. If a site meeting would
be helpful, contact Molly Roche (mroche@fcgov.com).
Comment Number: 2
09/25/2017:
Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
Please add Tree Inventory and Mitigation information to the landscape plans.
This should include all existing trees on -site labeled and listed in a legend.
Please provide reasons why trees are to be removed by adding a column to the
Tree Mitigation legend labeled "Reason for Removal".
Comment Number: 3
09/25/2017:
Comment Originated: 09/25/2017
Please use the most current version of the City of Fort Collins General
Landscape Notes (revised Nov 2015), which are available from Molly Roche.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scatter@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 08/08/2017
08/08/2017: Please schedule a pre -submittal meeting with Building Services
for this project. Pre -Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring,
early on in the design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of
the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project
should be in the early to mid -design stage for this meeting to be effective.
Applicants of new projects should email scarter@fcgov.com to schedule a
Fort Collins
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
tcgov. com/developmentreview
October 06, 2017
Cathy Mathis
TB Group
444 Mountain Ave
Berthoud, CO 80513
RE: St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Catholic Church Expansion, MJA170001, Round
Number 2
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at 970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 07/27/2017
10/03/2017: Carried over for reference pending verification from PFA on the
configuration.
07/27/2017: The new proposed emergency access would require the
dedication of an emergency access easement. The process to dedicate an
easement can be found here under Easement Dedication and would need to be
completed prior to plan approvals.
http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 07/27/2017
10/03/2017: Carried over for reference as it appears this is still applicable.
07/27/2017: Should the portion of the rain garden that falls outside of the
existing drainage easement need to be dedicated as an easement, the
easement process identified in the previous link would also be applicable.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 07/27/2017
10/03/2017: With the indication on the civil plans indicating that the
westernmost drive approach out to Seton Street is ADA compliant, Engineering
Inspection visited the site and viewed that the existing sidewalk crossing does
not meet ADA with regards to slope and believes the overall approach would