Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SUE'S HAIRITAGE PUD - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 20-95 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS
BUSINESS SERVICE USES POINT CHART E For All Criteria Applicable Criteria Only Criterion Is the Criterion Applicable Yes No I n nl IV Circle the Correct Score Multiplier Points Earned Ixll Maximum Applicable Points a. Transit Route. X 2 0 2 b. South College Corridor X X 2 0 4 8 8 C. Part of Center X X 2 0 3 6 d. Two Acres or More X X 2 0 3 6 e. Mixed -Use X X 2 0 3 6 f. Joint Parking 1 2 0 3 g. Energy Conservation X 112131410 2 8 h. Contiguity X X 2 0 5 10 is Historic Preservation 1 2 0 2 j. 1 2 0 k. 1 2 0 I. 1 2 0 Totals 44- v vi Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points V/VI = VII a/o vu Business Service Uses (continued) h. Is the project located with at least one -sixth (1/6) of its property boundary contiguous to existing urban development? i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event occurred, has special public value because of notable architecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill the following criteria? 1. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation; 2. Assure that new structures and uses will be in keeping with the character of the building or place. Imitation of period styles should be avoided; and 3. Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will lead to its continuance, conservation, and improvement in an appropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the neighborhood. Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 -72- ACTIVITY: Business Service Uses DEFINITION: E Those activities which are predominantly retail, office, and services uses which would not qualify as a neighborhood service, neighborhood convenience, or community/regional shopping center. Uses include retail shops; offices; personal service shops; financial institutions; hotels/motels; medical clinics; health clubs; membership clubs; standard and fast-food restaurants; hospitals, mortuaries; indoor theaters; recreation uses; small animal veterinary clinics; printing and newspaper offices; and, other uses which are of the same general character. CRITERIA: Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the development plan. Ye$ No N/A 1. Does the project gain its primary vehicular access from a street other than ❑ South College Avenue? 2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST FIFTY (50%) PERCENT OF ❑ THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED ON POINT CHART "B" FOR THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA? a. Is the activity contiguous to an existing transit route (not applicable for uses of less than twenty-five thousand [25,000] square feet GLA or with less than twenty-five (25] employees, or located in the Central Business District)? b. Is the project located outside of the "South College Avenue Corridor"? c. Is the project contiguous to and functionally a part of a neighborhood or community/regional shopping center, an office or industrial park, located in the Central Business District, or in the case of a single user, employ or will employ a total of more than one hundred (100) full-time employees during a single eight (8) hour shift? d. Is the project on at least two (2) acres of land, or located in the Central Business District? e. Does the project contain two (2) or more significant uses (for instance retail, office, residential, hotel/motel, or recreation)? f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on -site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off -site parking areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces? g. Does the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage through the application of alternative energy systems or through energy conservation measures beyond those normally required by the Model Energy Code as adopted by the City? Refer to Appendix "E" for energy conservation methods to use for calculating energy conservation points. Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 -71- M Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA I APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITE"-dON Is the c , enon Will the c.-tenc acclicable? b satisfleC7� 5 X 3 sl Yes FoIf no, please ex^fain Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA 1.1 Solar Oriertaticn I I I 1.2 Comorehensive Plan 1.3 Wildlife Habitat I I I ✓I I 1.4 Mineral Deocsit I I I✓ I I 1..., 1.6 E_.,iecically Sensitive Areas Lands of Acric;:Itural Imocrance I r2sarved I I I I r3S2^red 1.7 Enerov Ccr.ser,iation I I I ✓! ' 1.8 Air Qualitv I IV/1 I I 1.9 Water Cluallty I I I 1 I 1.10 ga,Nacs =rd V`i=stes I ! I ✓ I 1.11 W2 erCor?se^/^ is ttI I I ✓I I I. 1.12 Residential Density I I I ✓J I I A 2 NE! G'r'BGRHOOD CONIFATIBILITY CRITE: ,(AI 2. i Ve.n cuiar. F=_d=st^an, mike Tmnsocration I I I✓ I I 2 2 Buldinc P!aCer-rent and Orient=_ticr I I I ✓I I I 2.3 Natural Feat ,res I I It/1 - I I 2.4 Vehicular C:rcuiation and Farkinc I I ✓i I I I 2.5- Emergency AcCesS 2.6 Fecestriar,Circulation I I✓I I ✓I I 2.7 2.8 Arc;; ;itec:ure Buiidinc Heicnt and Views I I I 11 I I 2.9 Shading 2.10 Solar Acz:Sss I IV1 ✓ I I 2.11 Historic Rescur--es I I I I I I 2.12 Setbacks _ 2.13 Landsc=oe I I I I I 2.14 Sicns 2.15 Site Lichtinc I I. I 2.16 Noise and Vibration I I I V1 I I 2.17 Glare or Heat I I I 2.18 Hazardous Materials I I A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity 3.2 Desicn Standards ✓I ✓ 3.3 Water Hazards 3.4 Geclooic Hazards I I, 1 I _ Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised . h 19�,, 9/4 - 61 - 11 '' US� a..4. I,® .yLL /1 AM 6.ho, Vr 5/a✓ urvP UM MTA vela e..lwwo I „Y®.IDQ Vn Y.1_� r.�arYr.).xr�re yIDIHyaQ.r raa , I 1. ej O 1 s w a1YYP. ,V uw,al.v rnr.Ywrsar Vii ••, �w�.,aW Ie.s.r I � � • I I L It�PIMI III. ,© y s - / SIGX.)Na6 lr. ,M w., rrrw_rt •.a1�Ye.-ol¢_+.. fia.lLtL.�I..�. � »w ' rr num.o.xe uMNO pYf [RAFwf IVF I d I nr 1 +a+�wv, [1 �1 a°°tiL�iW o'�`'fn S U E S I m 16847o HAIRITAGE °"°` PUD NB9 Jz9 W '.3�Q.M O2GHA4O PL AGE.' 1 ": 1'. d t7m, f%. Ism. O61rTf. 6 T 9.19v7 •LL,.. Wu.m..,Iw Iw. u) x. clauwlo ..a. Ilr eoruexe. eY.aamn r4) rlV)I)N.M). s.d.. 17. r/.n.' • T»M• I l RLM $ R it emits RL to rr°°auj r i Qsc'� � I z W 00i AR � I W! LL p LU VICINITY MAP 04/28/95 20-95 SUES HAIRTAGE Preliminary & Final PUD No Text Sue's Hairitage PUD - Preliminary and Final, #20-95 June 26, 1995 P & Z Meeting Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Sue's Hairitage P.U.D., Preliminary and Final - #20-95. Sue's Hairitage PUD - Preliminary and Final, #20-95 June 26, 1995 P & Z Meeting Page 3 3. Parking: There are two off-street (paved) parking spaces in the driveway, at the northwest corner of the lot, and one off-street (gravel surface) parking space at the southwest corner of the lot. The street frontage of the lot exceeds 50' in width and, therefore, the residential portion of the property requires only one off-street parking space. The off-street parking requirements for the business portion of the property are two spaces for each three employees or, in the case of this beauty shop, two spaces. The three off-street parking spaces are considered to be sufficient for the existing and proposed land uses. 4. Signage: The project location is included in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District, which was established for the purpose of regulating signs for non-residential uses in geographical areas of the City which may be particularly affected by such signs because of their predominantly residential use and character. The requirements in this District are generally more restrictive than in other areas. All aspects of proposed signage for this restaurant/office park will be regulated by Section 29-593.1 of the Fort Collins Sign Code that is administered by the Zoning Department. 5. Neighborhood Compatibility: A neighborhood information meeting request because the business service present in this residence for almost complaint. The uses are considered surrounding land uses. FINDINGS of FACT/CONCLUSIONS: was not necessary for this use (the beauty shop) has been 15 years without incident or to be compatible with the In evaluating the request for the Sue's Hairitage P.U.D., Preliminary and Final, staff makes the following findings of fact: * The request scores 55% on the Business Service Uses Point Chart (exceeding the minimum 50o requirement). * The request meets the applicable All Development Criteria in the L.D.G.S. * All aspects of proposed signage for this business service use (beauty shop) will be regulated by Section 29-593.1 "Residential Neighborhood Sign District" of the Fort Collins Sign Code that is administered by the Zoning Department. Sue's Hairitage PUD - Preliminary and Final, #20-95 June 26, 1995 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background. The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: RL; existing single family residential, neighborhood park (Roger's Park) S: RL; existing single family residential E: RL; existing single family residential W: RL; existing single family residential The property was annexed into the City with the West Mulberry First Annexation in November, 1963. The property was subdivided as Lot 7 of the North Forty Subdivision, First Filing and approved by City Council in June, 1977. 2. Land Use: This is a request for preliminary and final P.U.D. approval for an existing 238 square foot beauty shop in an existing residence on Rocky Road. It was evaluated against the Business Service Uses Point Chart and the applicable All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. The proposal scores 55°6 on the point chart (exceeding the 50!s minimum requirement), earning points for: a) being outside of the "South College Avenue Corridor"; b) mixed -use (containing residential and a personal service shop); and c) contiguity to existing urban development. The point chart supports the existing and proposed land uses. The beauty shop had been a legal home occupation from approximately 1980 until recently when Sue Reeves, the operator of the business, sold the property and moved out of the residential portion of the property. By moving out, it is no longer a "home occupation". Section 29-459(1) HOME OCCUPATION of the City Code states that: "Such use [permitted accessory use] shall be conducted entirely within a dwelling and carried on by the inhabitants living there with not more than one other employee." The (primary) residential portion of the property is now a rental unit, thereby requiring the beauty shop to go through the P.U.D. process. The beauty shop is currently operated by Sue Reeves, the same person who was the operator when it was a home occupation. There is one other employee who is present 500 of the time. The other 50% of the time there is only one beautician present. ITEM NO. 2 MEETING DATE Fi /26/ 9 8 STAFF StPVP Olt PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Sue's Hairitage P.U.D., Preliminary and Final - #20-95 APPLICANT: Sue Reeves 700 Rocky Road Fort Collins, CO. 80521 OWNER: Ron Young 700 Rocky Road Fort Collins, CO. 80521 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for preliminary and final planned unit development (P.U.D.) approval for an existing 238 square foot beauty shop in an existing residence on Rocky Road. The property is located south of West Mulberry Street and Roger's Neighborhood Park, north of Orchard Place, east of Overland Trail, and is zoned RL - Low Density Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This request for preliminary and final P.U.D. approval: * scores 55% on the Business Service Uses Point Chart (exceeding the minimum 50% requirement); * meets the applicable all Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System (L.D.G.S.); * is located on a site that is included in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District; therefore, all signage will be regulated by Section 29-593.1 of the Fort Collins Sign Code that is administered by the Zoning Department. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT