Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHEARTHFIRE PUD, 2ND FILING - FINAL ..... ROUND OF REVIEW 9 - 31-95E - CORRESPONDENCE -Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Wes Lamarque 1 1. Please remember that the pending easements included with this submittal must be in final form and signed before a final hearing on this project can be given. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols 23 No Comments This development request is subject to the 90-day revision re -submittal as set forth in Section 2.2.11(A) of the Land Use Code. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6341. . Yours �Truly, STEVE OLT City Planner Page 4 r` 3) Grading easement east of tract E and north of Hearthfire Drive. Even if this property owner of this tract is Hearthfire Inc we still need a grading easement as they could sell the property tomorrow and the new property owner could not allow the grading. 4) Grading easement as well as drainage easement on the Water Supply and Storage Property south of the.southwest corner of the site. This is being worked . out with the attorneys. 5) Construction easement for construction of the retaining wall on lot.48. See comments on draft - the legal provided is incorrect the easement is to be on lot 48 not tract k. 25 Easements being dedicated to the county need to be submitted to the county for acceptance. I will need indication from the county that they have been received prior to scheduling a hearing. 26 Water Supply and Storage Property south of Tract C. An agreement can provide permission to.enter the property and do grading. The agreement needs to have language as being worked our by the City and applicants attorneys. 27 The drainage easement on lot 47 that has been recorded - This either needs to be rededicated to the city or the easement rights transferred to the city. 28 All off site easements and /or row are needed signed and in the final format ready for filing are needed prior to scheduling this project for hearing. Please note the dedication document needs to include the grantees name and address. 29 This project will also not be taken to hearing until the plans for Douglas Road are completed and approved. 30 Need to have whiting petroleum signature on this sheet and all other applicable sheets - wherever work is shown within their easements. 31 Need to update sheet 22 - County Rd 13 on what is proposed construction and what is existing road. Show the portion that is designed, but is not being constructed as being future. - 32 Sheet 15 - Pavement patching to be in accordance with the changes shown. Page 3 5. There is an easement question related to Sheet 15 of the utility plans. Stormwater 1. The City still needs all the final, signed easements that are required. 2. The affected ditch company's approval and signature block must be provided on the applicable plans. Natural resources 1. Doug Moore indicated that he is still checking the Wetlands Mitigation Map. 22 The Technical Services (Mapping) Department offered the following comments: a. The legal description and outside boundary do close. b. The street name "Town Center Way" is unacceptable. C. What is the "North County Road 13 Annexation"? d. Why does Lot 1 have building setbacks shown? e. On the Final Plat, please remove all of the Revision Notes. f. The Vested Rights Statement is not needed. Department: -Engineering. Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff 8 Plat Provide reception #'s for existing/off site easements that do not have them listed yet when these are obtained. 24 • All off site easements and/or row are needed prior to scheduling of this project for a final hearing. EASEMENTS and ROW needed - All drainage easements need to be dedicated to the City it is not acceptable for these to be dedicated to Hearthfire as we have no control over the easements or guarantee that they will be permanently retained. 1) row for CR13 -to be dedicated to the county 2) Utility easement adjacent to CR13 -to be dedicated to the county. 2A) Per sheet 15 of the utility plan set a proposed slope and drainage easement is shown. Does this exist or is this another easement that is needed? Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins Pinecrest Planning & Design c/o Tom Dugan 4225 Westshore Way Fort Collins, CO. 80525 Date: 10/26/01 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HEARTHFIRE PUD, 2ND FILING #31-95E, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Steve Olt 16 Why is a 2-rail white vinyl fence being proposed along each side of Town Center Way, adjacent to Lots 25 & 26? Is this something that the developer wants? This is not a City requirement. If it is something that the developer really wants then how will the 2. lot owners be made aware of the, requirement? They probably will want to put 6' high solid fences along those property lines. 18 What is the "North County Road 13 Annexation"? If referenced on the plans (as it is on the Site Plan), there needs to be a Recording or Reference # of some sort. The east 1/2 (only) of County Road 13 was annexed into the City with the Country Club North Second Annexation. The City does not have any record of the "North County Road 13 Annexation", by separate document or anything else. 21 The following comments were expressed at the Staff review meeting on Wednesday, June 27th: Engineering 1. The big thing is still the required easements. The City has not yet received all of the final, signed easements. 2. The required Douglas Road improvements plans are not complete enough to schedule this item for public hearing. Some easements are still needed. 3. There is "stuff' on Lot 48 of Filing One that affects this filing. 4. Whiting Petroleum must sign these development plans. Page 1