Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAST RIDGE - PDP - 33-98D - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)F [12/6/05] There are several utility crossings between the water line and services and the storm lines especially the 72-inch line that could create problems. In a meeting with ELCO the City and the consultants, it was agreed that at final the water lines locations would be shifted within the street section to minimize the number of crossings, use of elliptical storm lines will be investigated and sleeving of services will be provided when appropriate. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Peter Barnes Topic: zoning Number: 3 Created: 4/4/2005 [11/23/05] Note #3 on plat sheet 1 of 10 states that all lots have a 3' drainage easement on each side yard lot line. The plat no longer shows this easement on the plat sheet for the lots in question. However, this note will need to be amended to clarify that there actually isn't an easement on the side lot lines. [7/26/05] Sheet SP-4 shows the 10 lots for the attached single family units. However, if these lots contain the 3' side yard easement that is typical on all the lots, then attached units won't work. I don't have a plat to review with this round, but if they haven't removed the easements, they'll have to do so. [4/4/05] Their project note #7 and their response number 4 on their Conceptual Review letter response indicate that there are 3 housing types proposed with this PDP. However, only 2 housing types are listed in the Unit Type Summary on Sheet SP-2 of 8. The Code requires 3 housing types in each PDP over 45 acres in size. Even if there are 3 housing types in the ODP, that doesn't satisfy the requirement that 3 are required for this particular PDP. So I don't believe the "Future MF Tracts" count towards satisfying the requirement. Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. Sincerely, Pete Wray Senior City Planner Page 6 [11/18/05] 1 have some concerns about the paired water services. In some places the paired services, fire hydrants and storm drains leave no room for electric facilities. Preliminary designs have been discussed in the utility coordination meetings and one solution was to show all utilities on the utility plan. I .know it's costly to place electric facilities on the utility map, so maybe we can simply meet and resolve specific issues rather than putting all facilities on the map. Department: Natural Resources Topic: General Number: 150 [11/30/05] No remaining issues. Issue Contact: Doug Moore Created: 11 /30/2005 Department: Stormwater-Water-Wastewater Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Topic: 24-inch Raw Water Irrigation line Number: 153 Created: 12/6/2005 [12/6/05] Please shift the proposed 24-inch irrigation water line to the north edge of Tract J in order to allow the placement of a future box culvert outfall through the that area. Please provide a cross -sectional view through that tact that would allow an outfall system to be built through that area. It would be ideal if a 30-foot wide swath is left open from trees and other utilities which would allow the City to build the master planned box at a future date. Topic: Drainage through the Future Park site. Number: 151 Created: 12/6/2005 [12/6/05] Grading in future park area needs to be worked out so that the site accommodates detention while still allowing the park to have flexibility in design. This grading should be agreed to with the park and stormwater prior to plan approval. A meeting should be set up with myself from Stromwater and Craig Foreman from Park Planning and Development to finalize the proposed grading on the park site prior to final plan submittal. No forebay is proposed on one of the outfall locations off of Sykes Drive please adjust or show better how the proposed swale will act as a sediment forebay. 3 pipes are shown coming through the park site. It would be preferable if these are consolidated into one box culvert in order to maximize future use by the park. Topic: Erosion Control Number: 160 Created: 12/7/2005 [12/7/05] December 6, 2005 At final, please provide a complete sediment construction management plan with required report, documents, and calculations. Topic: Storm Line ST-9 Number: 154 Created: 12/6/2005 [12/6/05] That Line will be taking off -site flows from the north. Please size the stub under Barnstormer Street such that it will accommodate the 270 cfs off -site flow from the north. Topic: Utility Crossings Number: 152 Created: 12/6/2005 Page 5 [8/2/05] No more than 500sf of surface area may drain over a public sidewalk. (4/20/05] Will need sidewalk culverts at all Alley intersections to take the drainage out to the street. Cannot drain over sidewalk. Number: 44 Created: 4/20/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance. The comment still needs to be addressed. [8/2/05] [4/20/05] Vertical crest and sag curves must be in accordance with details 7-17 and 7-18. Number: 127 Created: 8/5/2005 [11/22/05] Final -Compliance, repeat for all stubbed out streets. [8/5/05] Sheet 38 - please provide 500' of offsite preliminary design. Number: 143 Created: 11 /22/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance -We don't want the sidewalks and street trees installed along any undeveloped tract and in FC, we'll want the various plan sets to be clearly labeled as such and we'll need an estimate for the uninstalled items for our review and approval. Once agreed upon, that amount will need to go in the DA and escrowed prior to the first building permit. Topic: Striping Plans Number: 146 Created: 11 /22/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance. Please separate the striping and street plan and profile sheets and create a striping plan sheet. Topic: Typical Street Sections Number: 145 Created: 11 /22/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance. The typical street sections still aren't correct. Please dimension using engineering scale just like shown in Figure 7-9F. The parkway will be 7' instead of 6' where the VC is used instead of Rollover. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 148 Created: 11 /22/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance. Please add a blank signature line to the end of the list just in case we have to have a random signature on some of the pages. Thank you. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Janet McTague Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 139 Created: 11 /18/2005 [11/18/05] Please add a light between lots 4 and 5 on Block 13 Number: 140 Created: 11 /18/2005 [11/18/05] On block 5 a light was relocated between lots 9 and 10. Tthe maximum distance between lights in this area is 320'. Number: 141 Created: 11 /18/2005 [11/18/05] Please add a streelight between lots 17 and 18 on block 22 Topic: Overall Utility Plan Number: 142 Created: 11 /18/2005 Page 4 Topic: Landscape Plans Number: 91 Created: 4/25/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance - the plans look much better but it wouldn't hurt to meet with JR in Tech Services before going to mylar when we're ready for that. [8/5/05] [4/25/05] Please see Appendix E6 for scanning requirements. These sheets will not scan well and will not be accepted. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff Topic: Plat Number: 161 Created: 12/8/2005 [12/8/05] Comments from Technical Services: 1. Boundary and legal close. 2. Subtitile and legal describe property incorrectly, include NW 1/4 Sec 9. 3. The "proposed row" at the west side needs to be dedicated as row. 4. Blocks need to be physically described and shown with separate line type and text style. 5. Where the "proposed" international blvd crosses into this plat why is it not dedicated as row (on this plat)? The portion on this plat will need to be dedicated with this plat. 6. Minor red lines - see plat. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Plat Number: 147 Created: 11 /22/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance. Alley's require an 8' UE but the plat and utility plan and profiles are showing a 9'. OK to give more but not required. Topic: Site Plan Number: 144 Created: 11 /22/2005 [11/22/05] Final compliance. Please dimension the parkway widths on each side of the street from block to block since they will be varying by one foot depending on the curb type used. Topic: Street Design Number: 26 Created: 4/20/2005 [11/22/05) The variance request has been approved. Please note it as such on line 48 of the General Notes section. [8/2/05] No decision has been made at this time pending more design information on the plans. (4/20/05] Right Turn Variance on Timberline — will discuss with Eric next week. I may need more information (like striping plans, street section, etc) from you before we can make a determination. Number: 42 Created: 4/20/2005 [11/17/05] Final Compliance. [8/2/05] This configuration is insufficient and will not be approved. A larger median will be necessary to prevent the left turn movements from Citation. [4/20/05] The porkchop in Timberline may not be adequate in the interim to control the movement. Will need to look at this more and discuss with Eric. Number: 43 Created: 4/20/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance - call out the appropriate detail for the sidewalk culverts from the alley to the street (D10-13) on sheet xx. Page 33 lane off the north west side of the property in the interim BUT this may go away if the over/under pass is constructed. If and when that happens, another acceptable secondary point of access will be required prior to the release of future phases. Topic: General Number: 25 Created: 4/20/2005 [11/17/05] Just keeping the comment open through Final Compliance. [8/2/05] The City agrees that the developer can provide an escrow for the cost of final design and construction of that portion of International Blvd from its SE corner west to a point representing the easternmost 1/3 of the wetland. The developer will be given the option to credit this cost against the payment from the City for Timberline ROW costs. The developer does not need to provide a final design for this roadway at this time, but does need to provide a preliminary design of this roadway so that drainage patterns and roadway grades for the three street stubs that tie into International Blvd will be accommodated. The city also agrees that the developer shall provide interim and ultimate designs for the three street stubs to International Blvd and escrow the costs to construct the portion of the roadways that will not be constructed with the development. It needs to be clarified that the portion of roadway adjacent to buildable lots will need to be constructed in accordance with Section 24-95 of the City Code and Section 3.3.2(D)(6) of the Land Use Code. Estimates for the escrow amounts must be submitted by a license professional engineer for the City's review and approval and those amounts will be added into the Development Agreement. [4/20/05] This development is responsible for the design and construction of International along its frontage. Need an interim and ultimate design for your street stubs to it. Will need to provide an estimate for the construction of the street stubs to the property line for our review and approval. That amount will go into the DA. Number: 28 Created: 4/20/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance - all plan sets need to clearly mark the parkway widths because of the varying curb type from side to side and block to block. [8/2/05] It is alright to use the 53' row in all conditions because the parkway will just be wider on the side with the vertical curb. The plans need to be very clear with what's happening and where. Right now there are conflicting typical cross sections that need to be cleaned up. [4/20/05] All local streets have been designed and platted with 53' of row. BUT you have some streets with VC both sides, some streets with rollover both sides, and some streets that mix and match. 53' of row is req'd for rollover both sides, 51' for VC both sides, and 52' where they are combined. You will need to provide separate typical street sections for each of these occurances (4 possible configurations depending on what side of the street is VC and rollover) and then list the street name from station xxxx to station xxxx underneath it. The curb must be consistent from block to block, can't change the curb type mid block. Number: 35 Created: 4/20/2005 [11/22/05] Final Compliance. Please see E6 and visit with JR in Tech Services to discuss the scannability of the plan sets. [8/2/05] [4/20/05] See Appendix E6 for all scanning requirements. Number: 149 Created: 11 /28/2005 [11/28/05] This review was preliminary in nature and only addressing items needed to go to public hearing. A more detailed review and comments will be given at the time of Final Compliance. Detailed comments on Final Compliance items will be provided at that time. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins JIM SELL DESIGN, INC. Date: 12/20/2005 MATT BLAKELY 153 W. MOUNTAIN AVE. FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for EAST RIDGE PDP, TYPE I, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Pete Wray Topic: Planning Number: 155 Created: 12/6/2005 [12/6/05] The request for Alternative Compliance from the Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards is not needed. The Block 14 length of over 700 feet is divided by a pedestrian connection in middle of Block thus complying with the Standard. Number: 156 Created: 12/6/2005 [12/6/05] Label all Blocks on Site Plans, Landscape Plans and Plat Sheets. Number: 157 Created: 12/6/2005 [12/6/05] Housing Types listed on Plat SP-2. Third housing type (Single Family Attached) states 2.4 bedrooms. Is this meant to be 2-4 bedrooms? Number: 158 Created: 12/6/2005 [12/6/05] Single Family small lot and standard lot total on SP-2 Unit Type Table totals 384 units. I counted 383? Number: 159 Created: 12/6/2005 [12/6/05] Conceptual Architectural Elevations. Add elevation of typical attached unit. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: Emergency Access Number: 20 Created: 4/20/2005 (11/22/05] Ron Gonzales has requested a separate exhibit with the EA drive profile overlayed with their truck template to make sure their trucks can negotiate the sags and crest curves. [8/2/05] Repeat. The emergency access easement shown or its proposed location does not meet PFA's minimum requirements. As stated below, this development is required to design and construct a second point of access acceptable to PFA in both the interim and ultimate conditions if you want to pull building permits for the entire site. In order to determine if the EA drive works in both the interim and ultimate, enough preliminary horizontal AND vertical design is required on the plans before going to public hearing. Please provide a plan and profile of the EA road as well as a plan and profile and show how it ties into Timberline in both the interim and ultimate. If you can not show that the EA drive will work in the ultimate, than only half the site will be allowed to pull building permits and this site would have to be phased or done in separate filings (please see comment 21). [4/20/05] This development as shown with is out of fire access. A second point of access is required per Ron Gonzales with PFA. He has agreed to a temporary emergency access Page 1