Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREGISTRY RIDGE PUD, PHASE I - PRELIMINARY ..... APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL - 32-95A - MEDIA - (6)OLORADCAN %;TARY Editorial Page Editor. COALMEZAL Kathleen Our 224-7733 The Coloradoan, Sunday, August 4, 1996, E3 Registry Ridge has support within city, logical uses I have been an architect warldng in land -use planning in Fort Collins for 20 years and am the planner for Registry Ridge. a meted -use project that has been annexed to the city for 12 years and has been through 18 months of city develop- ment review. I am writing about this project because of the campaign of disinformation care fully orchestrated in successive Soap- boxes, articles and letters by a group of county residents adjacent to the project who may believe they are protecting then' own interests in trying to prevent this property's development but who are car - tautly not representing the interests of city citizens. I believe you should know why: ■ 1.) To date, this project has received approvals farm five city reviewing bodies: staff, Parks Board, Natural Resources Board. Planning and Zoning Board and City Cored. Yet the city must now spend tax dollars defending claims against it which were brought by this group, whose members are neither city residents nor city taxpayers, while the developer must spend his own money de- fending the approval given the develop- ment They call themselves "Citizens for Sensible Community Plameng" in an ap- parent attempt to be seen as a ctzizens' watchdog group when, in fact, this self- interest group, whose board of directors all live next to the project, was formed just prior to filing its lawsuit 92.) The pmject's density is just over three dwelling units per acre, the citjs minimum requirement It has master plan approval of 702 units to be built in 13 phases over a number of years, each of which most receive separate preliminary and final plan approval. These neighbors want larger -lot county density, but the project is not in the county. City density policy encourages efficient use of urban Soapbox Frank Vaught land. Interestingly, the city's most recent version of its Structure Plan designates a majority of this project as low -density mixed -use, just as proposed. The plan for the corridor between Fort Collins and Loveland also shows Registry Ridge as appropriate far urban density at three dwelling units per acne. 03.) The project promotes city and county open space and corridor goals. To meet part of the city's land -use regmre- create, the developer provided deed dedi- cating to the city, at no cast 102.89 acres o%significant natural areas and an option for another 47.22 acres. This land is des- ignated in the Condor Plan as open lands and as priority open space in the city's Natural Area Plan. Its dedication to the city as part of Registry Ridge's ap- proval prevents the development of this valuable open space, which currently has master plan approval for up to 732 hous- ing units. The city's Natural Resources director stated at the Planning and Zoning Board hearing that Registry Ridge represents the best concept of clustering within the city because it prevents development on valuable off -site open space, which other- wise might occur. 04.) The project is buffeted and de- signed to be compatible. It is separated from the neighbors by a 100-foot arterial street and includes a substantial buffer strip, varying from 30 to 140 fleet in width. Large lots (from .35 to .46 acres) have been placed closest to neighbors. To try to continue working with neigh- bors after council approval, I called their spokesperson, offering to discuss ad- ditional bu$'ering and design options. Thew response was that they had hind an attorney to file a lawsuit The facts speak for themselves. Fort Collins' citizens should not be misled by unfounded claims of incompatibility. We are falling about single-family homes nert to single-family, homes and preserv- ing a large area of priority open space, which will benefit city and county resi- dents alike. Frank Vaught is vice presidern of a local architectural firm.