Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREGISTRY RIDGE PUD, 3RD FILING - FINAL - 32-95E - CORRESPONDENCE - (5)1. - A Please return all drawings red -lined by City staff with submission of your revisions. The number of copies of revisions for each document to be resubmitted is on the attached Revisions Routing Sheet. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments. Sincerely, 0teve Olt Project Planner xc: Engineering Stormwater Utility Transportation Planning Traffic Operations Natural Resources Dalco Land, LLC Northern Engineering Services, Inc. Landstar Surveying, Inc. Project File #32-95E r position and how to acquire the necessary easements. Planning 10. Is not Bon Homme Richard Drive a collector street? Street trees, as shown on the Landscape Plan on Bon Homme Richard Drive coming in from the First or Second Filing, should be continued along that street in this filing. The revised Landscape Plan does not show any new street trees. 11. Trail connections from Snook Court, into the common open area, and from Shangi i-La, into the future Fourth Filing, should be provided. 12. See additional comments on red -lined Site and Landscape Plans being forwarded to the applicant. 13. *****The City's GIS Department has discovered that a 35' to 40' wide strip on this property along the west line is in Larimer County and outside of the Urban Growth Area boundary. This affects several lots in the Registry Ridge PUD, First Filing and almost all of Lots 1 - 27 in this Third Filing. The necessary annexation.and revision to the Urban Growth Area boundary must take place before this development request can be scheduled for a Planning and Zoning Board public hearing and decision*****. The annexation request has been submitted and is in the process. This completes the staff comments at this time. Additional comments could be forthcoming as they are received from City departments and outside reviewing agencies. Under the development review process and schedule there is a 90 day plan revision submittal time -frame mandated by the City. The 90 day turnaround period begins on the date of the comment letter (June 5, 2000) prepared by the project planner in the Current Planning Department. Upon receipt, the revisions will be routed to the appropriate City departments and outside reviewing agencies, with their comments due to the project planner no later than the third weekly staff review meeting (Wednesday mornings) following receipt of the revisions. At this staff review meeting the item will be discussed and it will be determined if the project is ready to go to the Planning and Zoning Board for a decision. If so, will be scheduled for the nearest Board hearing date with an opening on the agenda. e. See the Stormwater Utility comments on the drainage and erosion concerns off of Bon Homme Richard Drive South. Please contact Kim, at 221-6641, if you have questions about her comments. 3. A copy of the comments received from Marc Virata of the Engineering Department is attached to this comment letter. Additional comments may be found on red -lined plans that are being forwarded to the applicant. Please contact Marc, at 221-6750, if you have questions about his comments. 4. A copy of the comments received from Donald Dustin of the Stormwater Utility is attached to this comment letter. Additional comments may be found on red -lined plans and reports that are being forwarded to the applicant. Please contact Donald, at 221-2053, if you have questions about his comments. The following comments and concerns were expressed at the weekly Staff Review meeting on May 24, 2000: Engineering (Marc Virata) 5. Any necessary off -site easements still must be provided to the City for review. Stormwater Utility (Basil Hamdan) 6. Off -site grading easements are needed for work on the Natural Resources property to the west. Please contact Tom Shoemaker, at 221-6263, or Mark Sears, at 416-2096, to discuss the Natural Resources Department position and how to acquire the necessary easements. 7. The swales should be extended and shown as to how they tie into the natural area. Energy dissipaters could/should be used. 8. Stabilization measures are needed for the swales between the lots. Natural Resources (Kim Kreime�er) 9. Off -site grading easements are needed for work on the Natural Resources ,property to the west. Please contact Tom Shoemaker, at 221-6263, or Mark Sears, at 416-2096, to discuss the Natural Resources Department d- Commur. Planning and Environmental vices Current Planning City of Fort Collins June 5, 2000 VF Ripley Associates, Inc. c/o Cathy Mathis 401 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80521-5828 Dear Cathy, Staff has reviewed your revisions for the Registry Ridge PUD, Third Filing - Final that were submitted to the City on May 3, 2000, and would like to offer the following comments: 1. The City's Technical Services Department (Mapping) stated .that the subdivision plat and legal description close; however, an annexation plat needs to be filed before this plat can be recorded. 2. Kim Kreimeyer, the City's Natural Resources Planner, offered the following comments: General comments a. Please include the entire site on all of the plans. b. Thickspike Wheatgrass is not native to Fort Collins. Please change this species on the Landscape Plan and utility plans (Sheet 7 of 40) to native. Utility Plans C. What is going to be used as temporary vegetation? The cool and warm season species have been removed. d. Has the necessary off -site easement through the City's Natural Area to the west of this site been acquired yet? 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Boa 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970), 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020