HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAST RIDGE C-STORE - PDP - 33-98G - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSends. Figure 2 shows the assignment of the peak hour site generated
traffic at the key intersections (Vine/Lemay, Timberline/Vine, and
Timberline/Sykes). The Timberline/Sykes intersection is the same as
the Timberline/Access'A intersection in the cited TIS.
,The new land use on Parcel B is a convenience/gas store with
eight fueling positions. Site plans of the proposed convenience/gas
x.
store are provided in AppendiC. Table 2 shows the trip generation
using Trip Generation, 7th Edition, ITE, as the reference document.
This land use will generate 1220 daily trip ends, 85 morning peak hour
trip ends, and 106 afternoon peak hour trip ends. The proposed land
use will have.a significant amount (greater than 50 percent) of passby
traffic. The passby traffic will come from traffic on Timberline Road
and Sykes Drive. Figure 3 shows the assignment of the peak hour site
generated traffic at the key intersections. While the turning traffic
at the Timberline/Sykes .intersection increases, the site generated
traffic at the Vine/Lemay and Timberline/Vine intersections does not
change significantly. Figure 4 shows .the change. in traffic volumes
between the approved and proposed Parcel B land uses at the key
intersections.
Figure 5 shows the short range (2010.) peak hour. traffic volumes
with the approved projects plus build out of East Ridge as presented
in my .March 7, 2006 memorandum requesting the subsequently approved
capacity reservation. Table 3 shows the peak .hour operation.
Calculation forms are proved in Appendix D. This intersection was
shown to operate acceptably.
Figure 6 shows the short range (201b) peak hour, traffic volumes
with the approved projects plus build out of East Ridge with the
convenience/gas store traffic. Since the proposed land use change
adds so little traffic to this intersection, only a few turning
movements volumes change. Table 4 shows the peak hour operation.
Calculation forms are provided in Appendix E. This intersection will
continue to operate acceptably.
It is concluded that the proposed convenience/gas store on Parcel
B will have very little impact at the key intersections.. The
Vine/Lemay intersection will continue to operate acceptably, meeting
the APF criteria at this intersection. It is respectfully requested
that the capacity reservation at the Vine/Lemay intersection be
approved with this proposed land use change.
Do not hesitate .to contact me if there are questions or more
information is required..
N
co L
C
88/123
C9 LO co
�- 159/143
54/37
/�—
Vine Drive
8/26
100/167
61 /66 —j�
^ rn v
o LO
N N
N
C
Q
E
(D
J
A
N
N
uO `
`O f 119/146
75/40
20no }
90/168 o
74/61 °' C
CAD N
m U')
co
O
Q'
N
C
O
m
E
DELICH ASSOCIATES Traffic & Transportation Engineering
2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
George Hart,
Matt Blakely,
City of Fort
Matt Delich
MEMORANDUM
PLS Homes
Jim Sell Design
Collins
March 16, 2007
is e rC i. j ! L7
East Ridge Development - Transportation Impact Study for
Land Use Change (File: 0245ME05)
A land use charige,has been proposed on Parcel B in the East Ridge
Development. located in the southeast quadrant of the Timberline/Vine
intersection in Fort Collins. This development has a capacity
reservation at the Vine/Lemay intersection, as documented in Eric
Brake's letter. dated March 1, 2007. The, East Ridge Final Project
Development Plan has been accepted by the City of Fort Collins
(Cameron Glass letter dated March 5, 2007 (signed March 7, 2007)).
Per the Eric .Bracke letter, if a change of land use is proposed, a
reevaluation of the capacity reservation will occur.' This memorandum
provides the information necessary for that reevaluation. Eric Bracke
requested a memorandum. showing new counts (within the last year) at
the Vine/Lemay and Timberline/Vine intersections and the current
operation at these intersections. In addition, the Vine/Lemay
intersection should be reevaluated with. regard. to the capacity
reservation.
Recent peak hour traffic counts were obtained at the Vine/Lemay
and Timberline/Vine intersections as shown in Figure 1. The
Vine/Lemay counts were obtained in February 2007. The Timberline/Vine
counts were obtained in August 2006. These counts are less than one
year old. Raw traffic data is provided in Appendix A. Previous
traffic counts at these respective intersections were obtained in
February 2006 and January 2005. At the Vine/Lemay intersection there
has been an increase in traffic in the' past year. At the
Timberline/Vine intersection there was a decrease in traffic between
the two counts. Table 1 shows the peak hour operation at these
intersections using the most recent traffic counts. Calculation forms
are provided in Appendix.B. Both intersections operate acceptably.
The approved land use on Parcel B is retail. From the trip
generation table in the "East Ridge Transportation Impact Study,"
(TIS) .February 2003, this parcel was shown to. generate 41.0 daily trip
ends, 33 morning peak hour trip ends and 26 afternoon peak hour trip
EAST RIDGE CSTORE - PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONCEPTUAL ARCRITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
r�• r
�y
l011lLfJICN
r 1 11 rAY IDUTIDII
�
,�
>f
0
GSIa.-irml n nle Cer Weel, :Ne !}vellon me
-tlJ4]-'1.19V
r r ].r�<IlUll i0
O
u
Y f
lr
'w
U
goal
U
L.51ere-SYrr [ev.iilrii. nl. LU We.�.Frgl [lrvelbn w
6 u
a
r
U
C
FWAM SET
s
NOT Fm
CONSTRUCTM
cu ro
/ufrri.s
--
s.r rwa
s.r..
Frrw c.r,,,nr .w.r m.
OF
LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANT UST DESIGN OBJECTNE
rz ers NRz uraaML u m w.Hi¢roa A
NY....RMa x.... r.a maranRaaLwr�xazve. r�nLuazLecrto Hwr Lar
�, rW M rOVaMLCX LrRmRYG.Mvlt C.6YHM VM4iNiLm N/J
xepyNLaMW M1mIQHL LUOLL416 IHM.OaO1!
up 8¢ECI W y 1HE Aµie v4L oswre sTimG NIEIFsi N
uLRanzboa
.W
nrr
oa oqr wr. a L v au
Li
AIX RirAY�^. 4Y.m�x Y�x..f�n./ yy� 5 1.® im
c�.a..ar w... oar LaLx e
LANDSCAPE CATEGORIES
DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING
aNmw�r.�wzw
�NmN i����wa�lomw
STEEL EDGING
SHRUB PLANTING
PLANT NOTES
�. .ueuMH.rE1MLBax.LLPFMN'fm041Ce WM4MBVe6i:n11
IW a�W16
1 .LL1R669 LBlp,.6.mfm16 WO WeCOm BrNYVIm
eW Y`L m
L zzemarawbmmzL.nan Rvxrw®mLamo
eBW uamamLeRwz xmeo W mE 1MR vno MRRzroz
,nu MNn.L aNlzm.GQlt zeM RMewwa.z mz
rwnm
emzzram�awanozwnznawLz va..rertuzi
tfY8Mx1W66m
L MRW.rbPASeFM1M11r.m60M.W RCiw4xmR[C?9PO
aW.
��uwabwsa.zaxowwrtLamAwswrcwoepwo
away. ioE mxwmiriw.rmama�euwaaeMuauwmr.w
,. �.wmL,CMe,a,..eW VIOBfI1WMW BYLLZRLiNb NY
�, LOMNwNYI.E.da»,® TOM eOR.LMauMCE
m6R8fIfMaPPMaRY rrEiTlO
aW�EX,YI
, a.narwuMz.rmr®bnmazrmLwrwW
zwEE 1n��ug
Lucm.a e.w. x.m. u�a.. aeRuonoH a r
eer.eEx�R.vyaa,
.,. La+a.�L muza,zmmw.000LO W�..cxaaewnw.
n �m���zmcin.M. u�mue�nz.+
zaiwo Rezaernox.ro w.mv �xL
.i WI,MCIm{ISHdiEIW a[11f 6YwT/LIB.wNaW
awxmonzLaRmEciNEaarus.R. MavuoM.z LEn
aunvo.r+w a.Lme v xoxu.
., RRazmnMaveazwiw.r. ro.mna.m rammv
a riuLrow,.w.vLvri.wLrmwauizeowuwiMi
co.�.c,®mmrmzxu� .ar.ww.
MIb PYImI.
t4iW.WDYY1)2®WlaET4LWlYW. WR.RVNIMIF
6Y®WMIMbt1HSIW4
i �.wo�Lw�u..c�rtr ao �w�o?c.ic Nv.
.e�xEeweENwn aEmrzmnornie onmarcnn
m ax nc w..lEvaiM.ASR® W
`x�mi�waucRw,.r...... rNaxauoeR,asazmex
�. ux oxazawa.,manrn anwenn.
.,...x®r .w.�m�aen rmrnuL..nW zarzzr>�zm
.x MEVOCNLE �tTETCF WEM..FRFdLUNCE aCND W EaWOW
wiPx CrM �NOYYEmraxlY M0
eLRv.�i.Lw:w,�ac" awc woxrosunHCEW.rwL
w uN,n rwo.w
mesmam
uooaan.,zr
zsrr
POP SUSMITTN
REVIEW SET
HOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
"/m
r
LA1-
SYe PI
••• I
� �i
wci,
1 II
1
I
1 3 1
1
I
I i
I
I
f ]�mroxlrouFx �
I
mnoy '
1
'
I
1
E
z
k
I
i uwomago
,
10 I 1 3'<
I�
p I
1
1 (
i ,
1 1
:
N�wu]
►
11
1
1
I0.uq 1.._..
1
1
1
1
1
ar
rv.su��rt
Ya ar]
I
1mM
1
iwo]xrw?e�
I
}
axon
I
----
i1
x
F
,ar]rewn
r]ro I'
i
�r
om. I
1
I
11
1
Ilp«ywu",._ «�
_
wcwlws.wuussuE'a
f
�
I
k
Elgl],l ]IIFA ]lllf
61fIM81i]i YOMI ]I
®N
N
—_-
we
+
w__. a---- "SVKES
w—w—w
w w—
DRIVE
(J
_
_-----
— wo,m«i-
-
LAND USE PARKING DATA
,nwm iww ,aw.x vn uE�]
mom. wrz
Ivwornrr� �]wr _
wv.wln ..n
MCY4G ]Jb
SITE DATA
• ,f]I«1CM,M W,M •]S]�10Viwrt.,�141
m®
du-r.a
I&RIA'AL
,qqqq","
to
� The
r
i
i
i
07
J
4 �W�. 4/AYMM w.Gi�.]YqulYrlrm+�M1.
t�AM�
N
W
SE'=09
PUP SUMMI TA
REVIEW SET
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SIGNATURES AND APPROVALS
Y
MPad tlb Mq�]Nn 4M�mnllm.Wq �MY�
p]Ytl W QhtllM lA�,. LubW AMA
East Ridge C-Store PDP
March 16, 2007
Page 4
H. A list of names of general and limited partners (if a partnership), all managers and directors (if a
limited liability company) and/or officers and directors (if a corporation) involved as either
applicants or owners of the project development plan:
Jeff Strauss, Manager
Darlene Schuster, Manager
East Ridge of Fort Collins LLC
4190 N. Garfield Avenue
Loveland, CO 80538
PHONE 669-0870
Fax 669-8299
A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the project, or stages
of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of
construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas:
Undetermined. The project will be developed in a single phase, and there are no public improvements
proposed.
6. Transportation Impact Study:
(see attached memo from Matt Delich, dated March 16, 2007)
10. Soils Report:
(see attached Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report for the 160-Acre Ryland Parcel, by Terracon,
dated March 25, 1999, the Supplemental Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report, by Terracon, dated
December 14, 2004, and the Preliminary Pavement Thickness Report, by Terracon, dated April 10, 2006)
12. Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis:
The proposed development will have fuel sales and thereby be required to store petroleum on -site in
underground storage tanks. There will be up to four tanks ranging from 6,000 to 20,000 gallon capacity
each. At a minimum there will be a diesel fuel tank, unleaded fuel tank, and a super unleaded tank. They
will more than likely be Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic Double or Triple Wall Petroleum Storage Tanks to
protect against potential leaks and will be installed per standard practices and per the manufacturer's
specifications.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at (970)-484-1921 or via email at mattb@iimselldesign.com.
Sincerely,
�Matthew J. Bl ely, ASLA ASSLAA
Project Manager
E:WROIECT FlIISu.ANOD EASTRIDGECSTOREDOCWUBB ,US1WWI)PSUBMMTT DOCUMEMS(w-I&n.DOC
East Ridge C-Store PDP
March 16, 2007
Page 3
HL Statement of proposed ownership and maintenance of public and private open space areas;
applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the project development
plan:
The owner/operator of the C-Store will be responsible for maintaining the open space and plantings on the
site.
iv. Estimated number of employees for commercial use:
The estimated number of employees will be from one to three per shift.
v. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant:
The applicant's rationale behind this development plan includes the need of a convenience store, with fuel
sales and car wash for the neighborhood and surrounding area. The next closest convenience store with fuel
sales is 1.5 miles away from the proposed project location, on East Mulberry Street.
The facility has been intentionally located within proximity to Timberline Road and the Vine Drive
intersection for greater visibility that is still easily accessible to the residents of East Ridge Subdivision.
The fuel bays have been placed on the west side of the site for more visibility from Timberline Road and to
reduce their visual impact on the neighborhood. The C-Store building is positioned on the east side of the
site to provide slightly easier access from pedestrians in the neighborhood and to help reinforce the
neighborhood center.
vi. Evidence of successful completion of applicable criteria:
To the best of our abilities and knowledge, we have prepared a plan that is compliance with the current
governing codes and criteria.
ix. Name of the project:
East Ridge C-Store PDP
D. Response Letter to Conceptual Review Meeting:
Cameron Gloss, the Director of Current Planning, has waived the Conceptual Review meeting requirement.
F. Legal description of the site:
A tract of land situate in the east half of Section 8, Township 7 North, Range 68 West, of the 6 h P.M.; City
of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado.
Tract W of East Ridge PDP, 0.96 Acres, generally located south of East Vine Drive and east of Timberline
Road. Specifically, Tract W is located at the northwest corner of the intersection between Sykes Drive and
Vicot Way.
G. Name and address of each owner within the boundary of the development plan area:
East Ridge of Fort Collins LLC
4190 N. Garfield Avenue
Loveland, CO 80538
PHONE 669-0870
Fax 669-8299
EIIUMMFUX,U-M1121b8 EAST RO)MCSPORUUXX 51UM=A.LWDP SUBWWALDOCUbEt S(03-1641).DW
East Ridge C-Store PDP
March 16, 2007
Page 2
Policy T-5.2 Connections
Through site design, the primary entrance will be visible to all pedestrian traffic approaching from
Timberline Road. Other approaches will have clear access and will be readily apparent to the pedestrian
user.
Policy T-5.3 Continuity
The site will connect to other proposed pedestrian circulation on all sides of the site.
Policy T-5.4 Sidewalks
The sidewalks on site will provide connections to the greater sidewalk pattern and shall be comfortable and
safe for the pedestrian.
Policy CAD-1.4 Street Tree Design
$treet trees will be used to create intuitive corridors on the perimeter of the site. A mixture of species will
be used to provide variety and interest.
Policy CAD-3.1 Modification of Standardized Commercial Architecture
The Architecture of this site will be compatible with that of the greater East Ridge development and will
conform to the City of Fort Collins Land Use code and will add to the City's unique appearance.
Policy CAD-3.2 Compatibility with Surrounding Development
The architecture of this site will solidify and enhance the character of the surrounding neighborhood.
Common building materials, details and color will .be used to create this connection.
Policy CAD-4.2 Lighting and Landscaping
Lighting and landscaping will be used to provide adequate security to all users of the site and surrounding
areas. Areas of high contrast and shadow will be avoided and landscaping will not create areas of
seclusion.
Policy LMN-2.7 Neighborhood Retail Uses
The convenience store with fuel sales use in this location is beyond 3/ of a mile from the nearest similar
facility.
I Description of proposed landscaping and circulation on site and in the general vicinity of the
project:
Street trees planted within the parkway will buffer and enhance the surrounding community. Tree
placement as well as light placement and type will minimize light pollution to the neighboring residents.
This site will connect to the East Ridge development and the greater area through pedestrian, bicycle and
vehicular circulation. The design of the site will separate pedestrian and bicycle circulation from vehicular
traffic to avoid user conflict.
E:M0=FTLPSR.A U468 EAST RD)OE C ST0REDOCS%SUBhfl TAL DMDP SUBA9TT' DOCUMENTS(0346-07)DOC
t
March 16, 2007
City of Fort Collins
Current Planning Department
281 N. College Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING
RE: East Ridge C-Store Project Development Plan Submittal
ENGINEERING
Dear Current Planning Department:
GRAPHIC DESIGN
Jim Sell Design, Inc. represents East Ridge of Fort Collins LLC, the applicant for the C-Store PDP Development.
We are submitting for your review the East Ridge C-Store Project Development Plan. The following represents the
narrative portion of the submittal and is in direct response to the Project Development Plan Submittal Requirements
to the City of fort Collins. Please see the attached appropriate documentation where noted.
A. Application form, Filing fee, and sign posting fee:
(see attached Application Form)
B. Adjacent Property Owners List:
(see attached APO list and labels)
C. Statement of Planning Objectives:
Proiect Overview
The proposed PDP is for Tract W of the East Ridge Development. This 0.96 acre site is located on the
northeast comer of Timberline Road and Sykes Drive. The site is ropghly square, with distances of 200'
long by 250' wide. The East Ridge Development borders the site on the north, south, and east. Timberline
Road is the west boundary. This site is within the City of Fort Collins Growth Management Area (GMA)
and the current zoning is LMN. This property is encompassed within the East Mulberry Corridor plan.
i. Appropriate City Plan Principles and Policies achieved through the PDP:
Policy LU-1.1 Compact Urban Form
Provide goods and services to local residents in close proximity to their home. This area will become a
Neighborhood Center that will cohesively tie existing residents and users to the new development.
Policy LU-2.2 Urban Design.
Will link to new neighborhood through common arch style and planting design. This project development
plan will be developed and reviewed by the city through the design review process and responds to the
applicable city and county codes and standards.
Policy LU-4.1 Planning within the Context of City Plan
This site is located within the East Mulberry Corridor plan study area This project meets the guidelines
and recommendations set forth in the plan.
Policy T-2.2 Transit Stons
Higher density areas will support the future transit stop proposed to be located as shown in the East
Mulberry Corridor Plan at the intersection of Timberline Road with the collector road.
Policy T-4.1 Bicycle Facilities
Bike parking will be provided on site. Bike lanes are located on the adjacent collector and arterial streets
allowing easy access to the proposed development.
PDP SUBMT'AL DOCUMEM^ (617647).DOC
153 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 P97D.484,1921 F-970.484.2443 INFO@JIMSELLDESIGN.COM JIMSELLDESIGN.COM �'
ROP fl
SITE
U
O N
<a�e
gar
T
ROSELAWN CEMETERY
#33-98G East Ridge C-Store PDP - Type II N
11 /5/2007
1 inch: 600 feet
Plannir. Development and Transportati . Services
Planning and Zoning
City of Fort Collins
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 6, 2007
To: Planning and Zoning Board Members
Thru: Cameron Gloss, Director of Planning & Zoning
From: Stephen Olt, Project Planner 495A
Susan Joy, Project Engineer -!�5T-3
Re: East Ridge C-Store, Project Development Plan (PDP) - #33-98G
Re: Recommended condition of approval on the aforementioned PDP. This
recommended condition becomes part of the Staff Report & Recommendation to
the Planning and Zoning Board for the December 6, 2007 hearing. City staff
recommends approval of this PDP proposal provided that the following condition
is addressed and satisfied prior to Final Plan approval:
"The developer is responsible for redesigning Sykes Drive to
accommodate the design and construction of the proposed median at the
intersection of Sykes Drive and North Timberline Road; and, for obtaining
the additional street right-of-way necessary to construct the new Sykes
Drive road alignment and width."
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020
East Ridge C-Store, Project Development Plan, #33-98G
December 6, 2007 - Planning & Zoning Board Public Hearing
Page 6
• Meet a wide range of needs of everyday living in neighborhoods, including
a variety of housing choices, which invite walking to gathering places,
services and conveniences, and that are fully integrated into the larger
community by pattern of streets, blocks, and other linkages. A
neighborhood center provides a focal point, and attractive walking and
biking paths invite residents to enjoy the center as well as the small
neighborhood parks. Any new development in this district shall be
arranged to form part of an individual neighborhood.
• Typically, Low Density Neighborhoods will be clustered around and
integral with a Medium Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood with a
Neighborhood Commercial Center at its core.
This proposal complies with the purpose of the LMN District as it is an infill project, as
part of an approved ODP, which provides components of a neighborhood center on a
property that is surrounded by developed and undeveloped properties. There is an
existing residential neighborhood to the west, a planned neighborhood center to the
east and south, and planned single-family and multi -family residential to the north, east,
and south.
5. Findings of Fact/Conclusion:
A. The East Ridge C-Store, PDP is in conformance with the approved East Ridge,
Overall Development Plan.
B. The East Ridge C-Store, PDP contains uses permitted in a neighborhood center
in the LMN - Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning District, subject to a
Planning & Zoning Board review and public hearing.
C. The East Ridge C-Store, PDP meets all applicable standards as put forth in the
LUC, including Standards located in Division 3.2 - Site Planning and Design
Standards, Division 3.3 - Engineering Standards, Division 3.5 - Building
Standards, and Division 3.6 - Transportation and Circulation of ARTICLE 3 -
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS;
D. The East Ridge C-Store, PDP complies with all applicable Land Use and
Development Standards contained in Article 4, Division 4.5 of the LUC.
E. The East Ridge C-Store, PDP is compatible with the surrounding land uses.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the East Ridge C-Store, Project Development Plan -
#33-98G.
East Ridge C-Store, Project Development Plan, #33-98G
December 6, 2007 - Planning & Zoning Board Public Hearing
Page 5
"in order to form an outdoor space such as a plaza, courtyard, patio
or garden between a building and the sidewalk. Such a larger front
yard area shall have landscaping, low walls, fencing or railings, a
tree canopy and/or other similar site improvements along the
sidewalk designed for pedestrian interest, comfort and visual
continuity."
Also, there is a 21' wide drainage easement that runs parallel to the
required 9' wide utility easement along the Vicot Way ROW. The drainage
easement prohibits the building from being able to satisfy the build -to line
standard without the exception.
D. Division 3.6 - Transportation and Circulation
Section 3.6.2. Streets, Streetscapes, Alleys and Easements
The proposal satisfies the applicable standards located in this section of the LUC.
Section 3.6.4. Transportation Level of Service Requirements
The proposal satisfies the applicable Transportation Level of Service standards
including the following:
General standard. This development proposal satisfies Section 3.6.4(B), which
requires that all development plans adequately provide vehicular, pedestrian and
bicycle facilities necessary to maintain the adopted transportation Level of
Service standards contained in Part II of the City of Fort Collins Multi -Modal
Transportation Level of Service Manual for the following modes of travel: Motor
vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian.
4. ARTICLE 4 - DISTRICTS
A. Division 4.5 - Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood District
Convenience stores with fuel sales and fast food restaurants (without drive-in or drive -
through) are permitted in neighborhood centers in the LMN - Low Density Mixed -Use
Neighborhood Zoning District, subject to a Planning & Zoning Board (Type 2) review.
The LMN - District is:
• Intended to be a setting for a predominance of low density housing. The
housing is combined with complementary and supporting land uses that
serve a neighborhood and are developed and operated in harmony with
the residential characteristics of a neighborhood.
East Ridge C-Store, Project Development Plan, #33-98G
December 6, 2007 - Planning & Zoning Board Public Hearing
Page 4
square foot building. The combined uses would be allowed to have between 20
to 40 spaces.
B. Division 3.3 - Engineering Standards
Section 3.3.1. Plat Standards
The proposal complies with the general plat requirements as set forth in this section.
However, since the subject property is Tract W of the final East Ridge subdivision plat
that is not yet approved, that plat must be recorded and filed before the final East Ridge
C-Store development plans can be recorded and filed.
Section 3.3.5. Engineering Design Standards
The proposal complies with all design standards, requirements and specifications for
services as stated in this section of the LUC.
C. Division 3.5 - Building Standards
Section 3.5.3 Mixed -Use, Institutional and Commercial Buildings
The proposal complies with all requirements and specifications as set forth in this
section.
Orientation to a connecting walkway. The entries into the c-store and fast
food restaurant building front on a directly connecting walkway to public
sidewalks on both Sykes Drive and Vicot Way, as required in Section 3.5.3(B)(1)
of the LUC.
Orientation to build -to lines for streetFront buildings.
The c-store and fast food restaurant building is set back from Sykes Drive
(a collector street) a distance of 8.8' to 16.8' from the right-of-way (ROW)
line, with the average being 135; and, 70% of the length of the south
building face satisfying the build -to line requirements as set forth in
Sections 3.5.3(13)(2)(a) & (b) of the LUC.
The same c-store and fast food restaurant building is set back from Vicot
Way (a local street) a distance of 30.6' to 40.0' from the ROW line, which
does not satisfy the requirement that it meet the build -to line standard of
15'. The development proposal does, however, include an outdoor patio
on the southeast side of the building facing Vicot Way that satisfies the
permitted exception to the build -to line standard set forth in Section
3.5.3(13)(2)(d)1 of the LUC, which states:
East Ridge C-Store, Project Development Plan, #33-98G
December 6, 2007 - Planning & Zoning Board Public Hearing
Page 3
showed a portion of a future neighborhood center (4.03 acres) at this location.
Therefore, a City -sponsored and facilitated neighborhood information meeting was not
held for the specific East Ridge C-Store, PDP development proposal even though no
specific land uses permitted in a neighborhood center are shown on the ODP.
3. ARTICLE 3 - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The East Ridge C-Store, PDP proposal does meet all of the applicable standards in
ARTICLE 3 - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS of the LUC. Of specific note
are Division 3.2 - Site Planning and Design Standards, Division 3.3 - Engineering
Standards, Division 3.5 - Building Standards and Division 3.6 - Transportation and
Circulation. Further discussions of these particular standards follow.
A. Division 3.2 - Site Planning and Design Standards
Section 3.2.1. Landscaping and Tree Protection
The proposal satisfies the applicable Landscaping and Tree Protection standards,
including the following:
Street trees. The proposed street tree plantings are in accordance with Section
3.2.1(D)(2)(a), providing trees at 30' to 40' on -center in the 6' - T wide parkways
(between curb and sidewalk) of both streets (Sykes Drive and Vicot Way).
Screening. The proposed Landscape Plan satisfies Section 3.2.1(E)(4)(b) of
the LUC in that the on -site parking lots & vehicular use areas are being
sufficiently screened from the adjacent streets to the west, south, and east and
developable property on the north side with a mix of deciduous & evergreen
shrubs and ornamental grasses.
Parking lot interior landscaping. The proposed Landscape Plan satisfies
Section 3.2.1(E)(5) of the LUC in that there is 7% interior landscaping in the
parking & vehicular use areas with less than 100 parking spaces, which exceeds
the minimum requirement of 6%.
Section 3.2.2. Access, Circulation and Parking
The proposal satisfies the applicable Access, Circulation and Parking standards,
including the following:
Allowable number of parking spaces. The development proposal satisfies the
parking allowances for non-residential uses as set forth in Section 3.2.2(K)(2) of
the LUC for the c-store and fast food restaurant uses in this project. There will be
14 parking spaces on the site, including one handicapped space, for the 4,400
East Ridge C-Store, Project Development Plan, #33-98G
December 6, 2007 - Planning & Zoning Board Public Hearing
Page 2
Standards located in Division 3.2 - Site Planning and Design Standards,
Division 3.3 - Engineering Standards, Division 3.5 - Building Standards, and
Division 3.6 - Transportation and Circulation of ARTICLE 3 - GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS;
The applicable district standards located in ARTICLE 4 - DISTRICT
STANDARDS of the LUC (Division 4.5 LMN - Low Density Mixed -Use
Neighborhood Zoning District).
COMMENTS:
1. Background:
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: LMN; undeveloped
E: LMN; undeveloped
S: LMN; undeveloped
W: O - Open in Larimer County;
existing residential (Collins Aire Park)
The property was annexed as part of the East Ridge Annexation in February, 2002 and
the East Ridge Second Annexation in October, 2005.
The property is part of the East Ridge, Overall Development Plan (ODP) that was
approved by the Planning and Zoning Board on January 20, 2005.
The subject property is being subdivided as Tract W of the East Ridge, PDP & Final
Plan. Tract W, being 0.96 acre in size, is part of a larger neighborhood center (4.26
acres) consisting of Tracts D, E, V, and W of the East Ridge, PDP that was approved
by the Administrative Hearing Officer on January 20, 2006.
2. ARTICLE 2 - ADMINISTRATION
Section 2.2.2. Step 2: Neighborhood Meetings
The proposed development is for a convenience store with fuel sales and a fast food
restaurant (without drive-in or drive through), which are permitted uses in a
neighborhood center in the LMN - Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning
District, subject to a Planning & Zoning Board (Type 2) review and public hearing. The
LUC does require that a neighborhood meeting be held for development proposals that
are subject to a Planning and Zoning Board (Type 2) review. A neighborhood meeting
was held on June 23, 2004, during the development review process for the East Ridge,
ODP. This proposal is in conformance with the approved ODP (January 20, 2005) that
ITEM NO. 2
MEETING DATE 12 / 6 / 0 7
6a
STAFF Steve Olt
OKUK An
City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: East Ridge C-Store, Project Development Plan (PDP) - #33-98G
APPLICANT: Jim Sell Design, Inc.
c/o Matt Blakely
153 West Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
OWNER: East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC
4190 North Garfield Avenue
Loveland, CO. 80538
East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC
P.O. Box 40
Timnath, CO. 80547
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for convenience store (c-store) with fuel sales and fast food restaurant
(without drive-in or drive -through) uses in a neighborhood center on 0.96 acre. The
PDP consists of a 4,400 square foot building containing a c-store and a fast food
restaurant; a detached canopy with 4 fuel islands underneath; and, a detached 850
square foot automatic self -serve car wash building. This proposed project is located on
the northeast corner of the intersection of Sykes Drive and North Timberline Road,
within the East Ridge overall development plan. The property is zoned Low Density
Mixed -Use Neighborhood (LMN).
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The proposal is in conformance with the East Ridge, Overall Development Plan (ODP)
approved by the Planning & Zoning Board on January 20, 2005.
The East Ridge C-Store, PDP proposal complies with the applicable requirements of
the Land Use Code (LUC), more specifically:
the process located in Division 2.2 - Common Development Review
Procedures for Development Applications of ARTICLE 2 -
ADMINISTRATION;
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970) 22 I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
';
1
o
is
I
_ ..
_.. _
HC
{{1_
-.
f
tS
_ O
ICL
L
SHIFT DRfVEWIA, TO THE EAST
AS NEC133SARY I
CLEARANCE FR1
164'
INTERSECTION
OFTIMBERLM.
TU CL OF DRIVE
3 S' ADDITIONAL
ROW REQUftD.
RIGHT AND THRU
LEFT TURN LANE
----AN
SYKES DRIVE
(MINOR COLLECTOR)
j7- MEDIAN
-0. TRAVEL
APPENDIX A
customers will learn that, during the peak hours, exiting via Vicot
Way will be more efficient. During other hours of the day, there
should not be a concern at this location.
It is respectfully requested that a variance to the spacing
standard from 175 feet to 164 feet.be granted. This reduction of nine
feet will not be detrimental to the public health, welfare, and
safety. The raised median on Sykes Drive will positively create a
right-in/right-out access to the gas/convenience store. Do not
hesitate to contact me if you have questions or desire additional
information.
Sincerely, oP"no � G/.
e
Matthew J. Deli h
�VAL.i
DELICH ASSOCIATES Traffic & Transportation Engineering
2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, Colorado 80538
Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 "7
August 1, 2007 File: 0245LT01
Mr. Eric Bracke, P.E.
Fort Collins Traffic Operations
P.O. Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
Dear Eric:
This letter is a variance request for the spacing between a
driveway to/from a gas/convenience store and Timberline Road, along
Sykes Drive, within the East Ridge development. A site plan is
provided in Appendix A. Sykes Drive is considered to be a minor
collector street. According to Table 7-3 in the Larimer County Urban
Area Street Standards, the distance between a high volume driveway and
a street intersection is 175 feet, on -centers. The distance shown is
164 feet.
As shown on the site plan, Sykes Drive will have a raised median
from Timberline Road to Vicot Way. This median will prevent left -ins
and left -outs at the subject driveway. The primary issue related to
the driveway location is that a number, of right -turning egressing
vehicles from the subject driveway will desire to get into the
westbound left -turn lane approaching Timberline Road. If there are
more than two vehicles in the left -turn lane, a vehicle exiting the
subject driveway will not be able to get to the back of the left -turn
queue. IAnalyses in the "East Ridge Transportation Impact Study"
indicate that the left -turn queue will be. approximately five vehicles
during the peak hours. This would indicate that exiting vehicles from
the subject driveway could not get into the left -turn lane during the
peak hours. However, experience would indicate that there would be
periods of time, during the peak hours, when there would be less than
two vehicles in the left -turn lane, especially when/if this
intersection is signalized and the traffic on Sykes Drive clears. At
times when the left -turn queue extends beyond the driveway, it is
likely that the right -turn lane queue would also extend beyond the
driveway. At these times, vehicles exiting the subject driveway could
not get on Sykes, Drive. The delays to the exiting vehicles would be
within the gas/convenience store property and would not negatively
impact the operation of Sykes Drive. Exiting vehicles also have the
alternative of using Vicot Way, which is over 220 feet from the stop
bar on Sykes Drive. Based upon the operational analyses, the queue on
Sykes Drive will not extend to Vicot Way. With this alternative
route, these vehicles can enter either westbound lane on Sykes Drive.
It is recommended that a sign be posted at the subject driveway
stating that "exiting vehicles should not block Sykes Drive." Since
this land use will primarily serve East Ridge and the nearby area,
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
short total
' 6: Vine & Lemay
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
►i
'*
Vi
T+
44
4+
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
0.97
1.00
0.94
0.97
0.99
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.99
Satd. Flow (prat)
1770
1815
1770
1757
1803
1832
Fit Permitted
0.28
1.00
0.28
1.00
0.95
0.75
Satd. Flow (perm)
516
1815
526
1757
1713
1382
Volume (vph)
83
290
59
121
205
125 47
672
204
98
468
39
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.85
0.85
0.85 0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
91
319
65
142
241
147 49
707
215
103
493
41
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
10
0
0
29
0 0
19
0
0
2
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
91
374
0
142
359
0 0
962
0
0
635
0
Turn Type
Penn
Perm
Perm
Perm
Protected Phases
4
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
21.3
21.3
21.3
21.3
44.5
44.5
Effective Green, g (s)
22.3
22.3
22.3
22.3
45.5
45.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.29
0:29
0.29
0.29
0.60
0.60
Clearance Time (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
152
534
155
517
1028
830
v/s Ratio Prot
0.21
0.20
v/s Ratio Perm
0.18
c0.27
c0.56
0.46
v/c Ratio
0.60
0.70
0.92
0.69
0.94
0.76
Uniform Delay, d1
22.9
23.8
25.8
23.7
13.8
11.2
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
6.2
4.1
47.9
4.0
16.3
6.6
Delay. (s)
29.1
27.9
73.7
27.8
30.1
17.8
Level of Service
C
C
E
C
C
B
Approach Delay (s)
28.1
40.1
30.1
17.8
Approach LOS
C
D
. C
B
Intersection Summa
HCM Average Control Delay
28.8 HCM Level of Service C
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.93
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
75.8 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
99.1% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Joseph
Matthew J. Delich P. E.
3/15/2007
Page 2
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
short total
3: Vine & Lemay
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
r
l
r
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR NBL
NBT
NBR SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
►j
j,
.
A
.
4+
4+
Ideal Flow (vphpq
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.6
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
0.94
1.00
0.95
0.98
0.99
Fft Protected
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
Said. Flow (prot)
1770
1754
1770
1777
1815
1830
Fit Permitted
0.17
1.00
0.57
1.00
0.95
0.93
Said. Flow (perm)
322
1754
1065
1777
1734
1711
Volume (vph)
27
99.
63
187
261
116 20
287
64 65
560
66
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.85
0.85
0.85 0.95
0.95
0.95 0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
30
109
69
220
307
136 21
302
67 68
589
69
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
26
0
0
19
0 0
8
0 0
4
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
30
152
0
220
. 424
0 0
382
0 0
722
0
Turn Type
Perm
Perm
Perm
Perm
Protected Phases
4
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
23.7
23.7
23.7
23.7
53.1
53.1
Effective Green, g (s)
24.7
24.7
24.7
24.7
54.1
54.1
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.62
0.62
Clearance Time (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.6
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
92
499
303
506
1081
1066
v/s Ratio Prot
0.09
c0.24
v/s Ratio Perm
0.09
0.21
0.22
c0.42
v/c Ratio
0.33
0.30
0.73
0.84
0.35
0.68
Uniform Delay, d1
24.5
24.3
28.0
29.2
7.9
10.7
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
2.1
0.3
8.4
11.6
0.9
3.5
Delay (s)
26.6
24.7
36.4
40.8
8.8
14.1
Level of Service
C
C
D
D
A
B
Approach Delay (s)
24.9
39.3
8.8
14.1
Approach LOS
C
D
A
B
-Intersection Summa
HCM Average Control Delay
22.6 HCM Level of Service C
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
86.8 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
89.8% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Joseph 3/15/2007.
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1
No Text
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: Vine & Lemav
reen sho long bkgdq
. figure 4 am
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR NBL
NBT
NBR SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
T*
rj
1.
4*
4;
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Fri
1.00
0.97
1.00
0.94
0.97
0.99
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.99
Satd. Flow (prot)
1770
1815
1770
1757
1803
1832
Flt Permitted.
0.28
1.00
0.28
1.00
0.95
0.75
Satd. Flow (perm)
516
1815
526
1757
1714
1382
Volume (vph)
83
290
59
120
205
125 47
672
203 98
468
39
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.85
0.85.
0.85 0.95
0.95
0.95 0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph).
91
319
65
141
241
147 49
707
214 103
493
41
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
10
0
0
29
0 0
9
0 0
2
0
Lane Group Flow (vphy
91
374
0
141
359
0 0
961
0 0
635
0
Turn Type
Penn
Perm
Perm
Perm
Protected Phases
4
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
21.3
21.3
21.3
21.3
44.5
44.5
Effective Green, g (s)
22.3
22.3
22.3
22.3
45.5
45.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
029
0.29
0.29
0.29
0.60
0.60
Clearance Time (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
152
534
155
517
1029
830
v/s Ratio Prot
0.21
0.20
v/s Ratio Perm
0.18
c0.27
c0.56
0.46
v/c Ratio
0.60
0.70
0.91
0.69
0.93
0.76
Uniform Delay, d1
22.9
23.8
25.8
23.7
13.8
11.2
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.60
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
6.2
4.1
46.1
4.0
16.0
6.6
Delay (s) .
29.1
27.9
71.8
27.8
29.8
17.8
Level of Service
C
C
E
C
C
B
Approach Delay (s)
28.1
39.5
29.8
17.8
Approach LOS
C
D
C
B
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
28.5
HCM Level of Service
C
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.93
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
75.8
Sum of lost time (s)
8.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
99.0%
ICU Level of Service
F
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Joseph
Matthew J_ Delich , P. E_
3/6/2006
Page 1
IT
HCM Signalized Intersection .Capacity. Analysis
recen ho ong bkg
total
3: Vine & Lemay
figure a am pm
r
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
t•
t.
4t
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Fri
1.00
0.94
1.00
0.95
0.98
0.99
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
1770
1754
1770
1777
1814
1830
Fit Permitted
0.17
1.00
0.57
1.00
0.95
0.93
Said. Flow (perm)
322
1754
1065
1777
1734
1711
Volume (vph)
27
99
63
187
261
116 20
287
65
65
560
66
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.85
0.85
0.85 0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
30
109
69
220
307
136 21
302
68
68
589
69
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
26
0
0
19
0 0
8
0
0
4
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
30
152
0
220
424
0 0
383
0
0
722
0
Turn Type
Perm
Perm
Perm
Perm
Protected Phases
4
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
.6
Actuated Green, G (s)
23.7
23.7
23.7
23.7
53.1
53.1
Effective Green, g (s)
24.7
24.7
24.7
24.7
54.1
54.1
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.28
0.28
028
0.28
0.62
0.62
Clearance Time (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
92
499
303
506
1081
1066
v/s Ratio Prot
0.09
c0.24
v/s Ratio Perm
0.09
0.21
0.22
c0.42
v/c Ratio
0.33
0.30
0.73
0.84
0.35
0.68
Uniform Delay, d1
24.5
24:3
28.0
29.2
7.9
10.7
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
2.1
0.3
8.4
11.6
0.9
3.5
Delay (s)
26.6
24.7
36.4
40.8
8.8
14.1
Level of Service
C
C
D
D
.-
A
B
Approach Delay (s)
24.9
39.3
8.8
14.1
Approach LOS
C
D
A
B
Intersection Summa
HCM Average Control Delay
22.6 HCM Level of Service C
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
86.8 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
89.8% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group .
Joseph
Matthew J. Delich , P. E.
3/6/2006
Page 1
16
No Text
SYKES DRIVE
P
EAST VINE DRIVE
.
.
�n gem rw�ws wra.
eeer aauwe, w wxe
pro u� Dui
.0 rro.se vas
Q
m
BARNSTORMER _
STREET
cc
O
J
<
Wuj
O
U
o
x
/ z
Z
3 z'
O J
H
/
CC
a
O
u LL
3
PROJECT SITE CONQUEST STR - —
L
O_ O<
O —S
3 -
2 ul
m 1 a
N SYKES DRIVE
_
SYKES DRIVE 8
.�
�F
KAT,�
S TRF� a�Q.h
y1�
Oraudng Name -
CAP fY[s
Name
Drawn
Deelgned
4
-
meew wwr \/"� �
V"e ked
Date 0�
Revi.+ed
V V
A'aj¢ct ' 1ue
Number
o 1w 2W 4W
i
SAeet
- - _
I
Of '
13
No Text
3: Vine & Timberline
Recent. PM
10i6i2006
�
-♦
�
�
�
�
1
t
t
�
1
1
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
4�
44
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Volume (vph).
70
168
61
40
146
9
110
197
71
4
127
35
Peak Hour Factor
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.86
0.86
0.86
Hourly flow rate (vph)
81
195
71
47
170
10
129
232
84
5
148
41
Direction, Lane #
EB 1
WB 1
NB 1
SB 1
Volume Total (vph)
348
227
445
193
Volume Left (vph)
81
47
129
5
Volume Right (vph)
71
10
84
41
Hadj (s)
-0.04
0.05
-0.02
-0.09
Departure Headway (s)
6.6
7.0
6.3
6.9
Degree Utilization, x
0.64
0.44
0.78
0.37
Capacity (veh/h)
501
450
538
442
Control Delay (s)
20.3
15.3
28.3
13.9
Approach Delay (s)
20.3
15.3
28.3
13.9
Approach LOS
C
C
D
B
Intersection Summary
Delay
21.3
HCM Level of Service
_C
Intersection Capacity Utilization
62.9%
ICU Level of Service
B
Analysis Period (min)
15
Synchro 6 Light Report
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1
it
3: Vine & Timberline
Recent AM
10/6/2006
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR .
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
+T,
41,
41,
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Volume (vph) ..
20
90
74
75
119
A
38
51
20
6
184
47
Peak Hour Factor
0.94
0.94
0.94
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.94
0.94
0.94
0.85
0.85
0.85
Hourly flow rate (vph)
21
96
79
88
140
1
40
54
21
7
216
55
Direction, Lane #
EB 1
WB 1
NB 1
SB 1
Volume Total (vph)
196
229
116
279
Volume Left (vph)
21
88
40
7
Volume Right (vph)
79
1
21
55
Hadj (s)
-0.19
0.11
-0.01
-0.08
Departure Headway (s)
5.2
5.4
5.5
5.2
Degree Utilization, x
0.28
0.34
0.18
0.40
Capacity (veh/h)
636
618
578
648
Control Delay (s)
10.2
11.2
9.7
11.6
Approach Delay (s)
10.2
11.2
9.7
11.6
Approach LOS
B
B
A
B
Intersection Summary
Delay
10.9
HCM Level of Service
B
Intersection Capacity Utilization
53.0%
ICU Level of Service
A
Analysis Period (min)
15
Matthew J. Delich , P. E_
Synchro 6 Light Report
Page 1
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
6: Vine & Lemay
recent pm
4%
f
Movement
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR NBL
NBT
NBR SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I
A
4
4
Ideal Flow (vphpD
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1000
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
0.96
1.00
0.93
0.99
1.00 "
Fit Protected
' 0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.99
Satd. Flow (prot)
1770
1783
1770
1733
1830
1842
Fft Permitted
. 0.32
1.00
0.39
1.00
0.92
0.82
Satd. Flow (perm)
599
1783
730
1733
1693
.1522
Volume (vph)
26
167
66
37
143
123 57
599
74 75
452
18
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.85
0.85.
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85 0.88
0.88
0.88 0.90
6.90
0.90
Adj. Flow (vph)
31
196
78
44
168
145 65
681
84 83
502
20
RTOR Reduction, (vph)
0
21
0
0
45
0 0
3
0 0
1
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
31
253
0.
44
268
0 0
827
0 0
604
0
Turn Type
Perm
Perm
Perm
Perm
Protected Phases
4
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
44.2
44.2
Effective Green, g (s)
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.5
45.2
45.2
"
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.65
0.65
Clearance Time (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0.
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
142
422
173
410
1098
987
v/s Ratio Prot
0.14
c0.15
v/s Ratio Perm
0.05
0.06
c0.49
0.40
v/c Ratio
0.22
0.60
0.25
0.65
0.75
0.61.
Uniform Delay, d1
21.4
23.7
21.6
24.0
8.4
7.1
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental.Delay, d2
0.8
2.4
0.8
3.7
4.8
2.8
Delay (s)
22.2
26.1
22.4
27.7
13.2
10.0
Level of Service
C
C
C
C
B
A
Approach Delay (s)
25.7
27.1
13.2
10.0
Approach LOS
C
C
B
A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
16.4
HCM Level of Service
B
HCM Volume to Capacity
ratio
0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
69.7
Sum
of lost time (s)
8.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
74.4%
ICU Level of Service
D
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Joseph 3/15/2007
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. G� Page 1
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Vine & Lemay
recent am
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
►j
T4
V
A
44
4+
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Frt
1.00
0.94
1.00
0.95
0.99
0.99
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
Said. Flow (prot)
1770
1756
1770
1763
1836
1840
Fit Permitted
0.32
1.00
0.54
1.00
0.94
0.93
Satd. Flow (perm)
596
1756
998
1763
1737
1726
Volume (vph)
8
100
61
54
159
88 20
279
27 61
570
37
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.85
0.85
0.85 0.85
0.85
0.85 0.89
0.89
0.89
Adj. Flow (vph)
9
112
69
64
187
104 24
328
32 69
640
42
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
28
0
0
25
0 0
3
0 0
2
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
9
153
0
64
266
0 0
381
0 0
749
0
Turn Type
Perm
Perm
Perm
Perm
Protected Phases
4
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
2
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
16.9
16.9
16.9
16.9
53.5
53.5
Effective Green, g (s)
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
54.5
54.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.68
0.68
Clearance Time (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
133
391
222
393
1177
1170
v/s Ratio Prot
0.09
c0.15
v/s Ratio Perm
0.02
0.06
0.22
cOA3
We Ratio
0.07
0.39
0.29
0.68
0.32
0.64
Uniform Delay, d1
24.7
26.6
26.0
28.6
5.3
7.4
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
0.2
0.6
0.7
4.6
0.7
2.7
Delay (s)
24.9
27.3
26.7
33.2
6.1
10.1
Level of Service
C
C
C
C
A
B
Approach Delay (s)
27.1
32.0
6.1
10.1
Approach LOS
C
C
A .
B
Intersection Summa
HCM Average Control Delay
15.7 HCM Level of Service B
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.65
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
80.4 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
78.4% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Joseph 3/15/2007
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. f,. Page 1
No Text
MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E.
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND, CO 80538
Phone: (970)669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 8/1012006 Observer: Joe
Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins
R = right turn F—Intersection: Vine / Timberline
S = straight
L = lett turn
Time
Northbound:
Southbound:
Total
Eastbound:
Westbound:
Total
Total
L
S
R
Total
L
8
R
Total
L
8
R
Total
L
S
R
Total
Begins
northlsouth
east/west
All
7:30
11
16
2
2
55
18
75
104
6
17
16
25
35
0
so
99
2 03.
7:45
8
133
8
il?J ��!I§
1
55
11
96
4
22
21
47 1
17
37
1
102
10 1
i
8:00
1
13
3
1
36
9
dd-
73
5
23
21
4
18
30
0
97
170
8
9 9
7
2
38
,49 -1
73
5 5
28
16
15
17
0
3.2
81
154 i
il!!i
7:30-8:30
51
20',
"
`109
237
346
it
2
90::�
44:':!
84
75:11ti"
195
379
PHI
0.94
0.79
0.94
0.81
LE
4:30
41
48
15
... 10 : I 1
1
38
1 8
Ij 4 j!
7.. - , I
151
17
54
16
i� 1:1 � 87if .i
12
43
2
1'' .1;! 57
144
4:45
23
43
22
88
2
29
6
125
.21
32
20
:1� 13!1�
: ;I
9
37
47.
120
245 1
5:00
34
67
15
1; A 41i
0
37
11
11
164
16
52
7
6
34
3
41
118
282, it
5:115
12 1
39
19
j4Y
1
23
10
K!
16
30
18
13'
32
3
112
4:30-5:30
iW!
119
;. t�
1Ej
378
1
166
6
E
544
,
299
9:::
195
494
:103
PHFJ 0.81
0.86
6
0.86
2007/FEB/22/THU 07:19 AM
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS FAX No.970
221
6262
P.007
City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations
M Unden Street. PO Box 5t30
Fort Col ins, CO W522-MW
North/South Street Lemay
Turning Movement Study
File Name : Lemay & Virw 2-21-07
EestANest Street: Vine
Site Code : 000W127
Time: PM
Start bate : 2/21/2007
ICU Number. 127
Page No
: 2
y� La,n.y
me
gpphb�A
1Nedboand
Northbound
Eastbound
eyr 1Mu
Left
Pom
tiv
-FIRM 11+u. I Left
I Ptm
agt
71ru 'Left
Pd@
ror
RVi
Mn
Left I Mae
FM* -HOW Arla)YUS Rom 04:30 PM
t0 06:15
PU - Peak 1 Of 1
Peak Hour f
Yr Each aech Reaft
at
+0 mtrts.
mom
4 117 10 '
0
131
-35 9 0 69
17 129 11
0
15T
oa
14 14 37
5 0 56
+15 Nn&
4 117 26
0
141
.25
40 37 8 0 85
22 148 9
'
0
179
18 .S1
. 7 0 76.
T. 0 65
'
+30 firs
5 124 23
0
.152
18 31 3 0 52
. 19 170 19
0
208
13 45
"
7 0 82
+45 ft s.
5 94
0
115
545
40 40 17 0
123 U3 37
16 152 18
74 57
0
0
188
730
21' 34
86 167
28 0 250
TcWud�
x
.18 452 75
3.3 6ZO 13.8
0
0
-
40.6 472 122 0
10.1 W-1 7.a
0
25.5. 64.5
10 0
-
.7oLd
PFiFSW.e11
.000
.ag8 .766 .ON _W .oW 1 .841 1 . 50
'.000
.577
Ja5 1
.020 ..ow .852
i
2007/FEB/22/THO 07:19 AM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS FAX No.970 221 6282
City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations
626 Linden Street, PO Box 580
Fat Collins, CO 80522-0580.
NorttdSouth.Street Lemay Turning Movement Study
East/West Street: Vme .
Tme: PM
ICU Number: 127
P. 006
File Name Lemay & Vim 2-21-07
Site Code :00000127
Start Date : 2/21/2007
Page No : 1
SOuthbound
WestbWnd
Vow.
- -
-
-
Northbound
��y
vM0
Eastbound
start rati
Tlev Lett Peas
..
TMu
Loft
Pack
Tfty
Loft
Pam
»;..
T1tu Lelt P�
r ss
a scan
.30 PM'
04.46 PM
4 11T 1 0
4 117 26 . 0'
t31
747
25 35
40 37
8
. 8
0
0
69
85
17 129
22 148
11
9
0
0
157
1791
1 S 0
78 51 7 0
58.
78
473
. 487
234 38 0.
278
65 7-2
17
0
154
39 277
20
0
338
8 1 0
32 88.
132
.900
05:00 PM
5
'124
23 '
0
162
18,
31
3
0.
- 52
19
170.
19
0
208
13
'45
7
0
e5
477
05:15 PM
5
84
18
0
115
40
40
17
0
97
18
152
18
0
186
21
34
. 7
0
_.62
460
Ordd Toed
18
452
T5
0
545
123
143
37
0
303
74
599
57
0
T30
66
167
26
0
259
1837
Apprch %
3.3
829
13.8
0
4"
47.2
122
D
10.1
B21
7.a
0
25.5
64.5
10
0
.
Told %
1
24.6
'4.1
o
29.7
. 6.7
7.8
2
0
1e_5
4
328
3.1
'0
39-7
3.6
9.1
1.4
0
14.1
2007/FEB/22/THU 07:19 AM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS FAX No.970 221 6282 P.003
City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations
626 Linden Street. PO Box 580
FortCoNeis, CO 80522-D580
No&vSouth street Lemay . Tuming Movement Study File Name : Lemay 3 Vine 2-21-07
East/West Street: vine Site Code : 00000127
Time: AM Start bate :212V2007
ICU Number: 127 ' Page No : 2
Vine..
Lcmay
virm
Southbound
westbound
Nartfibarld
Eastbwnd
Smart
� Thin
Laft Path r�
re�put
Thru Lr1t. Peas
rw.
RaAt
11.v LCR
Peen
,`.,..:
;NUN
I" LeftP*ft
r•..
Mt>w
Peak Hour Analpis From 07:30AMIOUVIS AM - eak 1 of 1
. , .P Hoturfor
Eadi
'
at:
•0 mbm
- 10 165
13
0
IN�18
27
.13 -
0
58
8
65
.
1
0
74
MOM
19
' 27
1
0
47
+15 rains:
11 151 .
'19
0
181
31 45
- 13
0
.89
9,
a5'
5
0
99
•18.
29
0
.1
-48
.
+30 mins.
8 110. '
14
0
132
24 '50
15 ..
0-
89
8
66
8
0
82
13
21
3
0
37
+45 mins.
8
15
1
_
i8B
15 37
13
0
65
2
63
8
0
71
11
23
4
0
38'
Teta Vdu ro
37 570
61.
'1
88 156
0
Sot
27
279
20
0
328
81
100'
8
1
170
.
x App,Tar
5.5 852
9.1
0.1
292' 52"8
17-0
0
.8.3
85-8
6.1
0
35.9
56.8
4.7
0.6
.. PHF -541 MA
W3 ,
250
.890
.710 .795
.845 .750
.921
.625
.000
-803
.Bll2
-5m
-250
M .
j.
.
2007/FEB/22%THU 07:19 AM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS FAX Na•970 221 6282
City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations '
626 Lilden Street, PO Box 580
Fort Coilins, CO 80522-0580
wlevsOuth sueet.Lemay Turning Movement Study
East/West Street: Vine
Time: AM
ICU Number. 127
P. 002
File Name _ Lemay & Mile 2-21. 07
Site Code : 00000127
Start Date : 2/21/2007
Page No .. :1
loyal
n
aw
ac
v
0&00 AM
8
110'
"14
0
132
24
50
15
0
80
8 fits
8
0
82
71
13
21
3
4
0.
0
37
38
340
342
08:15 AM
8.
144
15
1
168
-15.
37"
13
0
65
2 63.
27 279
8
20.
0
0
11
81
23
100
8
- 1
170
1466 `
Grog otal
°l.
37
570
61
1
969
t18
293
159
5ZB
54
17.9
0
D
301
8.3 95.8
6.1
0
.328
35:9
58.8
4.7
0:6
gpprrh
7oW 1L
5.5
2.5
852
3&9
"e.t
4.2'
Al
0.1
45.8
6
10.5
3.7
0
20.5
1.8 19'
. 1.4
.0 .
222
4.2
.8
0.5
0.1
11.6
No Text
TABLE 3
Short Range (2010) Total Peak Hour Operation
With Approved Projects Plus Build Out of East Ridge
F TA �S M1�: Y S I &.i .1 i'J
i i
Inteirsection f } q V5J Rs YM
n i AAovemerrt � tt
><.JY.I f t75 ft .r G f .+ C
"Vel O. S6N�C9 >
C'h'A YtL Ue�( w, IAA
aAWF Y rv� ii� S Y i PM;
p
a3s s
Vine/Lemay
(signal)
EB LT
C
26.6
C
29.1
EB T/RT
C
24.7
C
27.9
EB APPROACH
C
24.9
C
28.1
WB LT
D
36.4
E
71.8
WB T/RT
D
40.8
C
27.8
WB APPROACH
D
39.3
D
39.5
NB LT/T/RT
A
8.8
C
29.8
SB LT/T/RT
B
14.1
B
17.8
OVERALL I
C
22.6
C
28.5
TABLE 4
Short Range (2010) Total Peak Hour Operation
With Approved Projects Plus Build Out of East Ridge
With Convenience/Gas Store on Parcel B
;'• Fiit � '{1W 4 �-`_`y,l�i ��ntav$a�' F��+ � Zvi"r" y ?'fIf ', '"e'er a-4� is;u -r.fa ,+ ,,w,'F c_ �p .. t r '•;7 P 4.� tix , t s•'4 r i v �,/ a ;4 i �4Y � t t } `4tvS Le�Q1 � a�o� .� 5i *''Y � ✓ s
1�. 5.�. i r `,"ai'�' •r�,�+ i-� i ': z"'� IIIiCiV@F17e`i1� � nX, Zr t ,. 3i r�
Intersect�.on�_;
EB LT
C
26.6
C
29.1
EB T/RT
C
24.7
C
27.9
EB APPROACH
C
24.9
C
28.1
Vine/Lemay
(signal)
WB LT
D
36.4
E
73.7
WB T/RT
D
40.8
C
27.8
WB APPROACH
D
39.3
D
40.1
NB LT/T/RT
A
8.8
C
30.1
SB LT/T/RT
B
14.1
B
17.8
OVERALL
C
22.6
C
28.8
N
vrnco
m � 0
116/125
co `° co
- 261 /205
187/121
27/83 --)�
Vine Drive
t I (�
99/290
63/59
1-- N v
N .m
Go to
N
�— AM/PM
2010 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH APPROVED
PROJECTS PLUS BUILD OUT OF EAST RIDGE
WITH CONVENIENCE/GAS STORE ON PARCEL B Figure 6
m
c
a�
Q
m
E
a�
co
rn v co
co
0 0 116/125
co to`O U') CO f 261/205
187/120
27/83 1 1.
99/290 ^I N IM
63/59 g m N
N coLO
coo
N
f AM/PM
d
Vine Drive
2010 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH APPROVED
PROJECTS PLUS BUILD OUT OF EAST RIDGE Figure 5
Q
ca
E.
J
CHANGE IN PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC -
DUE TO CHANGE OF LAND USE.
U
A
N
Figure 4
v
o
Q
E
J
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
OF PARCEL B WITH CONVENIENCE/GAS
STORE LAND USE
N
Figure 3
w
ca
O
Q
E
E
J
F
A&
N
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
OF PARCEL B WITH RETAIL LAND USE Figure 2
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
,;fir �o tYY,,ti� y , ur 5 r v ✓yr �,T Y i� v yl A r
a7. A4 ri6F" t t "r- v .v' 'C
j�/�pt y T, vC
/►} k 1 ...) 7e•Y�t t s .h,x ,}
lntersection�(! �� "?, f.�'+nb n�vl Il
ip "'r o! x j �v�w� iAA.��t1���.�'.�{{e�4'r'�
M, i", lit I I�dC
i� y l F 7
1C()f'C
Y, ".'li.�l.}%�1...{^�'...
ir•a, Ml' Q 1 }
fY ,rJ 9 K ^Y
(signaal)l) Vine
EB LT
C
C
EB T/RT
C
C
EB APPROACH
C
C
WB LT
C
C
WB T/RT
C
C
WB APPROACH
C
C
NB LTIT/RT
A
B
SB LT/T/RT
B
A
OVERALL
B
B
Timberline/Vine
(stop sign)
EB LT/T/RT
B
C
WB LT/T/RT
B
C
NB LTIf/RT
A
D
SB LTrr/RT
B
B
OVERALL
B
C
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
K�AWDTEh
!�:
-
bfAM,PeaksHau
t PM PeakHoury
-
--Cade;
+..GKr
Tr}a Ttif-1
—:lp -0
...J+
.w
946
Convenience/Gas Store
8 positions
152.84
1220
1 5.43 1 43 15.21
1 42
16.67
1 53
16.67
53