HomeMy WebLinkAboutGREAT DANE MINOR SUBDIVISION (A.K.A. MORNINGSIDE VILLAS) - MINOR SUBDIVISION - 36-95 - CORRESPONDENCE - CITY STAFFTed Shepard - Re: Morningside Subdi,"--;on
Page 1
PV A4,
L
From: Peter Barnes
� ,-T
P
To: Basil Hamdan, Bob Blanchard, Bruce Vogel, Craig... W j1Et'S .y rA
Date: 9/28/99 9:11AM S
,
Subject: Re: Morningside Subdivision C/or��
I just want to clarify one thing - the property will have to be platted before any permit can be issued. The
plat will have to be processed as a Type 1. It's my understanding that a plat was submitted previously,
but has not received final approval, so I'm not sure if that plat application is still valid, or if Brett Larimer will
need to resubmit. At any rate, I have informed him that a plat needs to be approved.
>>> Ted Shepard 09/28/99 08:52AM >>>
Morningside Subdivision, formerly known as Great Dane Minor Sub., is located at the south end of
Morningside Drive, directly north of the Spring Creek Trail between Stuart and Stover. It is a request for
one 5-plex structure.
This project has been kicking around a long time and now there is a new twist. The new owner is Brett
Larimer. Stewart and Associates is the engineering consultant.
Paul Eckman has determined that the request must be processed UNDER THE RULES THAT WERE IN
PLACE AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL.
This means we must roll back the clock to 1995. The project will be shifted out of the Current Planning
Department over to Zoning where it will be processed as an R-M SITE PLAN REVIEW which is a "Building
Permit - Utility Plan Review." This is a "Use -By -Right."
Look for a new routing. Comments will be sent back to Zoning and Engineering. There will be no public
hearing, no posting, no letters to affected property owners.
We have the old file and old comment sheets if anyone needs. There are some issues that remain
unresolved:
1. Size of pipe under trail
2. Relationship (retaining wall?) to trail.
3. Fire sprinkler system required.
4. Easements needed from City.
5. Landscaping the parking lot.
Comments last sent to applicant on July 8, 1999.
Is this project in the running for the longest time in the review process?
Let me know if you have any questions, Ted.