The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutELIZABETH SUBDIVISION - FDP - FDP170033 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - REVISIONSTopic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 01/18/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 08/O8/2017: Ready for a public hearing. CCG Response: noted. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/17: This has not been corrected. Response: Revised Note 01/18/2017: On the plat the signature block for the Planning department needs to be changed to the Community Development and Neighborhood Services Director. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: Will verify this is corrected before printing to MYLAR 01/18/2017: The site plan and landscape plan are not two different sets. The sheet index on LS001 needs to include the Landscape plan sheets. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: Please show the split of the front and rear half of the lot also on sheet LS100 Also clearly label the property line for all sides. It gets lost in areas. RMS Response: Mid lot and property lines are added and labeled on all LS sheets. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: Front yard modification request not needed. RMS Response: Modification deleted. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: LUC 3.2.2(K) The required parking is 2 spaces per dwelling. With 2 dwelling units there should be 4 off-street parking spaces. RMS Response: Parking updated per change in carriage and primary house designations. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: Please provide additional information on floor area calculations. RMS Response: Information has been provided. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 01/18/2017: Some of the easements shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This has not been corrected. Response: Revised Note 01/18/2017: Please make changes to the Basis Of Bearings statement as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This has not been corrected. Response: Added 2 recorded monuments 01/18/2017: This property is unplatted land, and needs to be tied to at least two public land corners in the section in which it is located. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: These have not been provided for review. Response: Recorded monument have been email to Jeff County 01/18/2017: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 01/18/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 01/18/2017: Some of the easements shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: Would it be more efficient to access this site through the parking lot, instead of building a bypass? RMS Response: No, a separate entrance is needed to maintain autonomy of the two uses. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: The anticipated change in traffic volume is not expected to rise to the threshold of needing a TIS. Based on section 4.2.3.1) of LCUASS, the Traffic Impact Study requirement can be waived. CCG Response: noted. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 18 icounty@fcgov.com Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 01/18/2017: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum, and as of January 1, 2015, all projects are required to be on NAVD88 datum. Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED = NAVD88 - X.XX�. CCG Response: noted. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 01/18/2017: Some of the easements shown are incorrect. If they are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the Subdivision Plat. CCG Response: noted. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 01/18/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 01/18/2017: Please tie the coordinate values shown for utilities to the project boundary. We would prefer that this be done by adding property corner values to each sheet, or showing the property comer values on the horizontal control plans and adding a note to each sheet with coordinate values. CCG Response: The property corner horizontal coordinates have been added to Sheet 6. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 08/08/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 01/18/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, lschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/12/2017 08/07/2017: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon redline returned to the 281 N College on 8-7-2017), an Erosion Control Report (Saw note that this was to be provided at FDP), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Same as Report). If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com 01/12/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit; Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation.(No security estimate was provided). If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Basil Hamdan 970-224-6035 or email bhamdan@fcgov.com . Please show flow arrows/direction along the ROW, and provide erosion protection downstream of the site along the public right of way. Identify closest downstream inlet and provide erosion control protection at that location due to potential tracking from construction activities. Please provide construction details for all ESC measures shown currently or added to plan based on comments. Please refer to redlined plans and report for additional comments. CCG Response: The Erosion Control documentation will be provided with the FDP. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 O8/08/2017: Stormwater is ready for a public hearing. CCG Response: noted Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: At Final Plan Review, please revise the water quality calculations to match the bio-retention sizing calculations. CCG Response: The water quality calculations have been updated using the bid -retention sizing calculations. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: At Final Plan Review, please provide documentation in the text of the drainage report that a variance is granted for not providing quantity detention. Also, please explain how the lot being less than the basins assumed impervious ratio is justification for the variance. This variance was provided due to only a single family lot being proposed. CCG Response: The variance and explanation has been added to the Final Drainage Report. Department: Technical Services Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-60459 cfrickey@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/17/2017 01/17/2017: Since the applicant is not proposing to expand the non -conforming use, the project will no longer go to the Planning & Zoning Board for review. This project will now go to a hearing officer for its public hearing. RMS Response: Noted. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: Is there a way the main building and carriage house could be re -oriented so that the carriage house is behind the main house? Carriage house is a defined term in Article 5 of the Land Use Code and cannot be modified. This means that for this project to get approval, staff would have to consider the main house the carriage house since it is the unit furthest back on the site. This creates an awkward modification request that is a challenge to justify. RMS Response: Meeting held with Clay and Noah on August 16, 2017 to discuss. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: On the site plan, please indicate where the midpoint of the lot is located. This will help staff check compliance for the rear half floor area ratio limits in the zone district. RMS Response: Midpoint labeled on enlargement sheets, this has been added to the overall plan as well. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: The parking required shown in the parking table is incorrect. Since the residential lot has less than 40 feet of frontage, two off-street parking spaces are required for the main house per 3.2.2(K)(1)(c). The carriage house requires one additional off-street parking space per bedroom as stated in Section 4.7(F)(3)(a)(2) of the Land Use Code. If the carriage house has one bedroom, this means this project will need to provide at least three off-street parking spaces. RMS Response: Table has been updated and changed per new requirements for carriage house and primary residence being changed. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: In the table discussing the floor area ratio, there is a reference to a barn addition. I assume this relates to the existing accessory structure. To make this more clear, either refer to the existing accessory structure as the barn on the site plan or refer to the addition as an addition to the existing accessry structure. RMS Response: Term changed to match Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 08/08/2017 08/08/2017: How deep is the front porch shown? Per LUC Section 4.7(F)(1)(h), in order to meet the front facade criteria, the front porch must be at least 6 feet deep. Please add this dimension to the site plan so staff can check for compliance. RMS Response: Dimension has been added Department: Stormwater Engineering and system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please contact me or visit the following website for questions about electrical charges and fees: hftp://www.fcgov.com/uti lities/busi ness/bu ilde rs-and-developers/plant-i nvestmen t-development-fees CCG Response: noted. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/10/2017 08/10/2017: Modifications to our existing electric primary system will be needed. Depending on the proposed electrical service size, a new transformer may be needed to feed the residence and carriage house. Please let me know the proposed electric service size once known. CCG Response: The Architect or Builder will determine the electrical service size. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/10/2017 08/10/2017: A utility or power line easement will need to be dedicated through lot 1 to provide power to the residence and carriage house. It is anticipated that the new electrical service will come from the secondary box next to the street light pole. CCG Response: The electrical service is planned to be routed within public right-of-way and Lot 2, Block 1. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/10/2017 08/10/2017: The proposed utility plan shows a sewer line to be relocated within an existing power line easement. Please relocate the sewer line outside of the power line easement. CCG Response: Tyler Siegmund needed to check with Senior Staff if the existing power line easement could be vacated per a phone call on August 18, 2017. Tyler Siegmund confirmed that this power line easement could be vacated per a phone call on October 26, 2017 Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/10/2017 08/10/2017: Please show the new electric meter locations on the utility plan. CCG Response: The electric meter locations were added to the Utility Plan. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/10/2017 08/10/2017: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers CCG Response: noted. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/19/2017 01/19/2017: Comment from Xcel -"Max pressure is 14" WC" Department: Planning Services Department: Internal Services Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 cfrickey@fcgov.com Comment Originated: 01/18/2017 01/18/2017: Comment from Pavement Management -"Rebuild entry to sidewalk to ADA standards." CCG Response: This comment has been addressed by adding the ADA Sidewalk Bypass to the Construction Drawings. This was confirmed with Katie Andrews with a phone call. Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/11/2017 08/11/2017: Construction shall comply with adopted codes as amended. Current adopted codes are: 2015 International Building Code (IBC) 2015 International Residential Code (IRC) 2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2015 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2015 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2015 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com/building web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI Al17.1-2017. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 129vult or 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use: 1. Single Family/Carriage House: 2015 IRC Chapter 11 or 2015 IECC. 2. Commercial Building: 2015 IECC commercial chapter. Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-27723 tiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/10/2017 08/10/2017: Light and Power has single phase electric facilities along E Elizabeth that can be utilized to provide power to the site. The existing building on the property is being fed from a secondary box on the frontage of the property. CCG Response: noted. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/10/2017 08/10/2017: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges Fort of Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax tcgov. com/developmentrevie w August 11, 2017 Shelley La Mastra RUSSELL + MILLS STUDIOS 141 S COLLEGE AVE, STE 104 Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Elizabeth Subdivision, PDP160046, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at 970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-6501, kandrews@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/17/2017 01/17/2017: Please label/show all proposed and existing ROW and easements on both the utility and site plans. RMS Response: Labels have been added to site plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/04/2017 08/04/2017: No additional PDP level comments - ROW/easement labels can be addressed in an informal pre -hearing review. Engineering may have more comments when final level plans are submitted. RMS Response: noted. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/31/2017 07/31/2017: Thank you for responding to all comments delivered January 2017 and updating plans accordingly. No further comments at this time. RMS Response: thank you