HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY RIDGE, 2ND FILING - PDP - 49-95F - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO APPLICANT (3)From: Steve Olt
To: Jim Newcomb; Marc Virata
Date: 4/22/04 8:44AM
Subject: Re: Correct Naming
Jim,
Harmony Ridge, Filing 2 (or Two) would be just fine. The choice is really yours. However, the City of Fort
Collins no longer has PUD's and, therefore, that reference should not be in the name. The previous
project was done under the City's previous system called the Land Development Guidance System, which
has since been abolished.
You will be submitting a development proposal as a Project Development Plan (PDP), per the City's new
Land Use Code.
Steve
>>> Jim Newcomb <jnewc@verinet.com> 04/21/04 11:01PM >>>
From the previous review I see at least three names used for the filing.
We have been planning on Harmony Ridge PUD, Filing 2. However we see
Harmony Ridge Second Filing, Harmony Ridge, Filing Two - with and without
PUD. Which do you prefer?
Kent Bruxvorrt is planning to bring over a variance request on the street
features and design. Please feel free to comment or raise a question on any
part of the plan to date. After the variance we will deliver an application
for review.
TKS JIM
CC: kentb@jimselldesign.com