HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY RIDGE, 2ND FILING - PDP - 49-95F - CORRESPONDENCE - LETTER OF INTENT (3)Steve Olt - Re: Lot 14 garage access Page 2
.t
>A revised letter of intent is still needed prior to scheduling of a
>hearing which includes Tract 1 in the language.
>Thanks,
>Marc
> >>> Jim Newcomb <Inewc(a)verinet.com> 08/26/04 05:23PM >>>
>Lot 14 has a challenge for a garage driveway on Prairie Vista Dr (PVD).
>The
Aot slopes to the South following the grading illustration on the town
>homes. Would it work to include a note on the site plan or plat stating
>the
>only home fronts on Fromme Prairie Dr (FPD) are the townhomes. Our plan
>could show a garage access only off FPW for Lot 14 and also note the
>home
>would front on PVD.
>The attorneys and the HOA representatives reviewing the Easements and
>the
>Supplement to the CC&Rs all know we need to add the word Tract 1 to the
>documents. I was the one who thought the entire length of tract was
>called
>7. We will have the documents as expected included with the final
>application.
>TKS JIM
CC: kentb@jimselldesign.com; Steve Olt
Steve nit - Re: Lot 14 garage access Page 1
From: Marc Virata
To: Jim Newcomb
Date: 8/27/04 11:32AM
Subject: Re: Lot 14 garage access
Jim,
Our concern stems from the fact that the front door to a home isn't always a guarantee that this is the way
a homeowner uses ingress/egress access. Folks have cars, often multiple cars and use their garages for
access, leaving the garage doors open for the day and having their driveways serve as the connection to
the home. We can't predict/regulate human behavior if a homeowner decides that all his/her ped traffic is
from the garage side, which is why the parking is needed for spillover parking off the driveway. Maybe
someone decides to wash their car, clean their garage, rinse off their driveway, etc. and needs to move
their cars out of the garage temporarily (if the cars are even stored in the garage to begin with), they are
not likely to drive around the corner to park, they will park in front of their driveway which in this case will
be on bikelines without the additional width provided.
With regards to the letter of intent issue, again, I have a letter of intent that I read covers only Tract 7. An
encroachment is occurring however in an other area outside of Tract 7 which isn't apparently covered in
the language. I can't feel comfortable that the letter of intent correctly identifies all the areas impacted by
offsite easements and thus can't support scheduling a hearing.
Thanks,
Marc
>>> Jim Newcomb <jnewc@verinet.com> 08/27/04 10:52AM >>>
I don't understand the concern on Lot 14 parking. A driveway to public
street without parking adjacent to the lot is of concern for us; The home
fronts on PVD with 70' of street. This lot has more parking available for
entrance because of a side driveway than most of the other homes. Surely
more parking space is not needed.
Marc - I am disappointed. The letter of intent already covers the area
called tract one as we knew it. All of us involved with the LOI thought it
was just 7 along the East side. We will make a giant effort to get a new
faxed copy of a corrected LOI to you today. I don't even know if Joe
Coulter is in town. I leave tomorrow AM for two weeks. It doesn't seem like
this issue should hold up scheduling a hearing when the intent is already
with you and the attorney's are working on the documents for the final
application. This requirement would work well as a final submittal because
the HOA is willing to sign off in Harmony Ridge Filing 2 with city approval
in the concept currently illustrated. This LOI will be coming, please
assist our project in having Steve schedule a hearing.
IMIP16T
At 09:59 AM 8/27/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>Jim,
>The home on lot 14 fronting PVD doesn't negate the need to widen FPW to
>provide parking adjacent to the lot. A driveway to public street
>without parking adjacent to the lot is of concern for us; again either
>no driveway access to FPW will be allowed or parking needs to be
>provided by way of extending the bump out for parking to the lot.