Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOSSIL CREEK NURSERY PUD - FINAL - 40-95A - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS4919 S. COLLEG. /E. FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 PHONE: 970-226-4924 January 2, 1996 Mr. Brad Saucerman Jim Sell Design 117 East Mountain Avenue Ft. Collins, CO 80524 Dear Brad, HM& UPNT ITHN Lfm Rob Wilkinson of the natural resources department was wondering what characteristics of the pond habitats of the retention ponds at the Fossil Creek Nursery PUD would be. We would like to include the following narrative: The lower retention pond will be used as a holding pond for water to reused in the irrigation of the nursery stock on the nursery. It will Rrobably not have Pach in the wa of flora except for marginal plants. Mosquito fish (Gambusis afims will be introduced to help control mosquIETurecamg. The upper retention/detention pond will be used for the production and sales of ornamental plants and fish. I hope this is what we needed. Let me know if you need any additional information. Sincerely Jack Fetig talked to Rob Wilkinson on January 2, 1996, about the referenced note. In that discussion, it was agreed that "no pruning and thinning" would occur to the cluster of existing trees located in the southwest comer of the site. This cluster of existing trees are known to serve as nesting habitat for owls. In addition, Rob Wilkinson agreed that the note "pruned and thinned out as needed" was acceptable for all other existing trees on site. f/ 6b. Jack Fetig talked to Rob Wilkinson on January 2, 1996, about the proposed disposition of existing trees south of the entrance drive and east of the retention pond. Mr. Wilkinson has agreed that these trees may be removed. v/6c. Note about the characteristics of the pond habitats has been added to the Site Plan. Please see response fetter from Jack Fetig dated January 2, 1996. 6d/Jack Fetig talked to Rob Wilkinson on January 2, 1996, about the use of native species in the "natural17 " areas. The Scotch Pines have been deleted from the right-of-way natural area. After further /zonsideration, Rob Wilkinson agreed that the Russian Golden Willows would be an acceptable tree. 76 Site Plan and Final Plat have been changed accordingly. 1 Jte Plan, Landscape Plans and Building Elevations have been renumbered as requested. 'k 2 one as requested. See responses from Northern Engineering. 9. The Site Plan has been changed in accordance with staff comments. Northern Engineering and Landstar Surveying will address comments regarding Civil and Utility Plans. 10. See response from Northern Engineering. In addition, the legal description on the Site Plan has been changed accordingly. 11. Regarding Sheri Wamhoff's comment relative to site access, please see enclosed letter from Matt Delich dated January 2, 1996. I believe the above responses and the accompanying documents respond to all the comments from city staff. Again, thank you for your time and consideration of this project. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, JIM SE L DESIGN INC.`%/%�j " Thomas W. Kehler Project Manager TWK/kms 14IT.9 c: Jack Fetig, Fossil Creek Nursery Greg Fisher, Architect Bud Curtiss, Nor -them Engineering Services, Inc. Matt Delich, P.E. Page 2 of 2 Q\WPD0CS\PROJECfS\1655\RESPONSE January 3. 1996 January 3, 1996 Mr. Mike Ludwig Community Planning and Environmental Services City of Ft. Collins PO Box 580, 281 N. College Ave. Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-0580 RE: Fossil Creek Nursery final response to city comments Dear Mike, This letter is in response to city staff comments dated December 15, 1995, regarding Fossil Creek Nursery P.U.D., final. The response numbers correspond to those of staff comments. im Sell ` 1. _ �. Also enclosed are letters that respond to certain comments from the City from Mr. Greg Fisher, Architect; Mr. Matt Delich, Consultant Traffic Engineer; and Mr. Jack Fetig, owner. The letter response to engineering issues from Northern Engineering Services, Inc. is being submitted separately.� In addition, Northern EngbWesinng-Servime.; Tnc. will make a submiit2-"—"'1., of the revised utility plans, as well as, the revised Drainage and Erosion Control Study as soon as these are ftnAjjzed _...__.______....____._...___...,...____._.......__.__.�//J Agreed. Civil drawings have been changed to a six inch supply. 2. The site plan and civil drawings have been changed to reflect a thirty foot utility easement. 3a. The utility easement has been widened to thirty feet on the Final Plat. 3b. The fire access lane has been changed on the Site Plan and Final Plat to a sixteen foot fire access and utility easement. 3c. See response by Northern Engineering. 4a. See response by Greg Fisher, Architect. Note 3 on Site Plan has been revised as requested. 4b. Note has been added to the Site Plan. 4c. Note has been added to the Landscape Plan. 4d. Site Plan shows the distances from the property line to all new building envelopes. 5a. Building construction will conform to the requirements mentioned in the note requested. Note has been added to the Site Plan. 5b. See response by Greg Fisher, Architect. 5c. Agreed. 5d. Agreed. .,6 eon Page I of? C:\WPDOCS\PROJECTS\I655\REST (303)484"1921