HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY RIDGE PUD, PHASE 2 (2ND FILING) - PRELIMINARY / FINAL - 49-95D - CORRESPONDENCE - (10)13. Under the LDGS, this development proposal will be evaluated
against the approved Harmony Ridge ODP and the All Development
Criteria and Residential Uses Density Chart.
14. Under the LUC, this development proposal is subject to all
applicable requirements as set forth in the LUC, more specifically
Articles 2. Administration (Development Review Procedures), Article
3. General Development Standards, and Article 4. [Zoning]
Districts.
8. Mark Jackson of the Transportation Planning Department
offered the following comments:
a. A TIS will be required. Please contact Eric Bracke of the
Traffic Operations Department for information regarding
the vehicle trips generated and Kathleen Reavis for
information regarding necessary bicycle, pedestrian, and
transit facilities.
b. Please contact GayLene Rossiter of Transfort to discuss the
City's intentions regarding transit service in the area. She
can be reached at 221-6195. (P 6 r,.
C. Pedestrian connectivity between this site and surrounding
sites is very important. This will be dealt with in the TIS.
Please contact Mark, at 416-2029, if you have questions about
these comments.
9. Ron Gonzales of the Poudre Fire Authority stated that the
question of a second point of emergency access must be addressed
and resolved with this development request.
- 10. Janet Meisel -Burns of the Parks Planning Department stated that
the development will be subject to the applicable neighborhood and
community, parkland fees, with the amount of the fees dependent
on the type of residential development proposed.
11. This development request will be subjectto the Development
Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning
Department office. The fees are due at the time of submittal of the
required documents for the appropriate development review
process.
12. NOTE: Development on this property can be reviewed by the City
under the LDGS or the LUC at this time. However, it is important
to note that the right to be reviewed under the LDGS will be lost if a
complete, combined Preliminary & Final PUD Plan is not submitted
to the Current Planning Department by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
January 18, 2000.
e. On -site water quality extended detention is required for
proved under the LUC. It is
projects reviewed and ap
�.._: r requested for projects reviewed under the and Development
Guidance System (LDGS).
f. Drainage runoff cannot be discharged into irrigation
ditches, so the runoff would have to flow over or under the
Trilby Lateral along the south side of this property.
Please contact Glen, at 224-6065, if you have questions about
these comments.
6. Kim Kreimeyer, the City's Natural Resources Planner, offered the
following comments:
a.' Development must.be set back from the ridgeline overlooking
the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area as specified in
Section 3.4.1, if reviewed under the LUC.
b. Was a buffer established, or are there agreements in place,
with the Harmony Ridge ODP and Phase One development?
C. A Fugitive Dust Control Permit will be needed and the permit
�_. will be issued by the Larimer County Environmental Health
Department. They should be contacted directly for
information regarding their requirements..
d. Minimizing the visual impacts of this development on the
Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area is very important.
e. Native plants and grasses should be used in this
development.
Please contact Kim, at 221-6641, if you have questions about these
comments.
7. Pete Wray of the Advance Planning Department stated that it is
important to provide a pedestrian link between this development
and the City's trailhead parking area to the west.
e. The existing REA power lines along the north side of this
property should be undergrounded at time of development.
There still is a question about who is responsible for the cost
of undergrounding.
f. If the development request is submitted under the LUC then
there could be concerns about how this development will
satisfy standards as set forth in Sections 3.6.2(B) and
3.6.3(B) of the LUC.
Please contact Marc, at 221-6750, if you have questions about
these comments.
3. Bruce Vogel of the Light & Power Department stated that the
proposal looks fairly standard from a power supply standpoint.
4. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department stated
that this development will get water and sanitary sewer services
from the Fort Collins -Loveland Water District and the South Fort
Collins Sanitation District.
5. Glen Schlueter of the Stormwater Utility offered the following
comments:
a. The property is in the Fossil Creek Drainage Basin, where
the new development fee is $2,274 per acre and is subject to
the runoff coefficient reduction. The site is in Inventory Grid
#4Q.
b. The standard drainage and erosion control reports and plans
are required and they must be prepared by a professional
engineer registered in the State of Colorado.
C. The Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area needs to be
considered and the disturbance associated with this
development minimized.
d. The applicant is proposing a single family residential project
instead of the multi -family proposal approved with the
Overall Development Plan (ODP). They are also showing that
the existing detention pond could be used, thereby
eliminating any more disturbance in the natural area.
b. The landscaping on -site must comply with the requirements
as set forth in Section 3.2.1 of the LUC. A detailed
�. Landscape Plan, showing existing and proposedplant
materials, must be submitted to the City for review as part of
the Type I development review process. ,
C. Parking requirements or allowances are set forth in Section
3.2.2 of the LUC.
d. Single family residential (with lots 15,000 square feet or
smaller in size) must comply with the City's Solar
Orientation Ordinance. Townhomes (multi -family) are not
subject to the ordinance.
Please contact Gary, at 221-6760, if you have questions about
these comments.
2. Marc Virata of the Engineering Department offered the following
comments:
a. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) will be required with
your Project Development Plan (PDP) submittal. Please
contact Eric Bracke of the Traffic Engineering Department,
�..' at 224-6062, for information about what will be required in
the TIS. Also, contact Kathleen Reavis of the Transportation
Planning Department, at 224-6140, for information about
what will be required for a multi -modal level of service study
(bicycles, pedestrians, and public transit) as part of the TIS.
b. The standard utility plan submittal requirements will apply
to the Harmony Ridge, Phase 2 development request.
C. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development. The fees
would be collected at the time of issuance of a building
permit and are based on vehicle trips generated by the
development. Please contact Matt Baker, at 224-6108, for
detailed information on the fees.
d. The `old" Harmony Road right-of-way may be vacated.
However, there must be a 40' right-of-way maintained for a
street or driveway as access to the existing City trailhead
parking area and the roadway must be maintained in good
condition.
>;
E �
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS
City of Fort Collins
MEETING DATE: December 13, 1999
ITEM: Harmony Ridge PUD, Phase 2
APPLICANT: Jim Sell Design
c/o Jim Sell, Vaughn Furness
153 West Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80524
LAND USE DATA:
Request for approximately 35 single family residential lots on 14 acres
(2.5 dwelling units per acre).
• The applicant suggested that the developer may be willing to do a
townhome (multi -family) project if that is the only option that
would meet the apparent setback requirement from the ridgeline
overlooking the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area.
The property is located on the south side of the "old" West Harmony
Road, west of Seneca Street, and east of South Taft Hill Road. It is in the
LMN - Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning District.
COMMENTS:
1. Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department offered the following
comments:
a. This property is in the LMN - Low Density Mixed -Use
Neighborhood Zoning District in the Land Use Code (LUC),
where the proposed single family residential use is
permitted, subject to an administrative (Type I) review and
public hearing. If any modifications of standards in the LUC
are needed then the item becomes a Type II review (by the
Planning and Zoning Board).
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970) 221-6750
CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Commur. Planning and Environmental c vices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
December 23, 1999
Jim Sell Design
c/o Jim Sell, Vaughn Furness
153 West Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80524
Dear Jim & Vaughn,
For your information, attached is a copy of the Staff s comments concerning the
request for Harmony Ridge PUD, Phase 2, which was presented before the
Conceptual Review Team on September 13, 1999.
This is a request for approximately 35 single family residential lots on 14 acres
(2.5 dwelling units per acre).
• The applicant suggested that the developer may be willing to do a
townhome (multi -family) project if that is the only option that would
meet the apparent setback requirement from the ridgeline overlooking
the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area.
The property is located on the south side of the `old" West Harmony Road, west
of Seneca Street, and east of South Taft Hill Road. It is in the LMN - Low
Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning District.
The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist 'you in preparing the
detailed components of the project application. Modifications and additions to
these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project.
If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps
in the review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6750.
Sincerely,
See Olt,
Project Planner
cc: Stormwater Utility
Streets
File
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020