Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY RIDGE PUD, PHASE 2 (2ND FILING) - PRELIMINARY / FINAL - 49-95D - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 -13. Under the LDGS, this development proposal will be evaluated against the approved Harmony Ridge ODP and the All Development Criteria and Residential Uses Density Chart. 14. Under the LUC, this development proposal is subject to all applicable requirements as set forth in the LUC, more specifically Articles 2. Administration (Development Review Procedures), Article 3. General Development Standards, and Article 4. [Zoning] Districts. 8. Mark Jackson of the Transportation Planning Department offered the following comments: a. A TIS will be required. Please contact Eric Bracke of the Traffic Operations Department for information regarding the vehicle trips generated and Kathleen Reavis for information regarding necessary bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. b. Please contact GayLene Rossiter of Transfort to discuss the City's intentions regarding transit service in the area. She can be reached at 221-6195. 6 C. Pedestrian connectivity between this site and surrounding sites is very important. This will be dealt with in the TIS. Please contact Mark, at 416-2029, if you have questions about these comments. 9. Ron Gonzales of the Poudre Fire Authority stated that the question of a second point of emergency access must be addressed and resolved with this development request. - 10. Janet Meisel -Burns of the Parks Planning Department stated that the development will be subject to the applicable neighborhood and communityparkland fees, with the amount of the fees dependent on the type of residential development proposed. 11. This development request will be subject to the Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning Department office. The fees are due at the time of submittal of the required documents for the appropriate development review process. 12. NOTE: Development on this property can be reviewed by the City under the LDGS or the LUC at this time. However, it is important to note that the right to be reviewed under the LDGS will be lost if a complete, combined Preliminary & Final PUD Plan is not submitted to the Current Planning Department by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 18, 2000. e. On -site water quality exte rodetention under the LUCuIt is for projects reviewed and approved requested for projects reviewed under the Land Development Guidance System (LDGS)• f. Drainage runoff cannot be discharged into irrigation ditches, so the runoff would have to flow over or under the Trilby Lateral along the south side of this property. Please contact Glen, at 224-6065, if you have questions about these comments. 6. Kim Kreimeyer, the City's Natural Resources Planner, offered the following comments: a. Development must,be set back from the ridgeline overlooking the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area as specified in Section 3.4.1, if reviewed under the LUC. b. Was a buffer established, or are there agreements in place, with the Harmony Ridge ODP and Phase One development? C. A Fugitive Dust Control Permit will be needed and the permit �_. will be issued by the Larimer County Environmental Health Department. They should be contacted directly for information regarding their requirements. d. Minimizing the visual impacts of this development on the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area is very important. e. Native plants and grasses should be used in this development. Please contact Kim, at 221-6641, if you have questions about these comments. 7. Pete Wray of the Advance Planning Department stated that it is important to provide a pedestrian link between this development and the City's trailhead parking area to the west. e. The existing REA power lines along the north side of this property should be undergrounded at time of development. _. There still is a question about who is responsible for the cost of undergrounding. f. If the development request is submitted under the LUC then there could be concerns about how this development will satisfy standards as set forth in Sections 3.6.2(B) and 3.6.3(B) of the LUC. Please contact Marc, at 221-6750, if you have questions about these comments. 3. Bruce Vogel of the Light & Power Department stated that the proposal looks fairly standard from a power supply standpoint. 4. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department stated that this development will get water and sanitary sewer services from the Fort Collins -Loveland Water District and the South Fort Collins Sanitation District. 5. Glen Schlueter of the Stormwater Utility offered the following c comments: a. The property is in the Fossil Creek Drainage Basin, where the new development fee is $2,274 per acre and is subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. The site is in Inventory Grid #4Q. b. The standard drainage and erosion control reports and plans are required and they must be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. C. The Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area needs to be considered and the disturbance associated with this development minimized. d. The applicant is proposing a single family residential project instead of the multi -family proposal approved with the Overall Development Plan (ODP). They are also showing that the existing detention pond could be used, thereby eliminating any more disturbance in the natural area. b. The landscaping on -site must comply with the requirements as set forth in Section 3.2.1 of the LUC. A detailed Landscape Plan, showing existing and proposed plant materials, must be submitted to the Cityfor review as part of the Type I development review process. C. Parking requirements or allowances are set forth in Section 3.2.2 of the LUC. d. Single family residential (with lots 15,000 square feet or smaller in size) must comply with the Ci y's Solar Orientation Ordinance. Townhomes (multi -family) are not subject to the ordinance. Please contact Gary, at 221-6760, if you have questions about these comments. 2. Marc Virata of the Engineering Department offered the following comments: a. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) will be required with your Project Development Plan (PDP) submittal. Please contact Eric Bracke of the Traffic Engineering Department, at 224-6062, for information about what will be required in the TIS. Also, contact Kathleen Reavis of the Transportation Planning Department, at 224-6140, for information about what will be required for a multi -modal level of service study (bicycles, pedestrians, and public transit) as part of the TIS. b. The standard utility plan submittal requirements will apply to the Harmony Ridge, Phase 2 development request. C. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development. The fees would be collected at the time of issuance of a building permit and are based on vehicle trips generated by the development. Please contact Matt Baker, at 224-6108, for detailed information on the fees. d. The `old" Harmony Road right-of-way may be vacated. However, there must be a 40' right-of-way maintained for a street or driveway as access to the existing City trailhead parking area and the roadway must be maintained in good condition. CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS City of Fort Collins MEETING DATE: December 13, 1999 ITEM: Harmony Ridge PUD, Phase 2 APPLICANT: Jim Sell Design c/o Jim Sell, Vaughn Furness 153 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80524 LAND USE DATA: Request for approximately 35 single family residential lots on 14 acres (2.5 dwelling units per acre). • The applicant suggested that the developer may be willing to do a townhome (multi -family) project if that is the only option that would meet the apparent setback requirement from the ridgeline overlooking the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area. The property is located on the south side of the `old" West Harmony Road, west of Seneca Street, and east of South Taft Hill Road. It is in the LMN — Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning District. COMMENTS: 1. Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department offered the following comments: a. This property is in the LMN — Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning District in the Land Use Code (LUC), where the proposed single family residential use is permitted, subject to an administrative (Type I) review and public hearing. If any modifications of standards in the LUC are needed then the item becomes a Type II review (by the Planning and Zoning Board). COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. PO. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (970) 221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Commur. Planning and Environmental c rices Current Planning City of Fort Collins December 23, 1999 Jim Sell Design c/o Jim Sell, Vaughn Furness 153 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Dear Jim & Vaughn; For your information, attached is a copy of the Staff s comments concerning the request for Harmony Ridge PUD, Phase 2, which was presented before the Conceptual Review Team on September 13, 1999. This is a request for approximately 35 single family residential lots on 14 acres (2.5 dwelling units per acre). • The applicant suggested that the developer may be willing to do a townhome (multi -family) project if that is the only option that would meet the apparent setback requirement from the ridgeline overlooking the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area. The property is located on the south side of the `old" West Harmony Road, west of Seneca Street, and east of South Taft Hill Road. It is in the LMN — Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning District. The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist 'you in preparing the detailed components of the project application. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project. If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6750. Sincerely, See Olt, Project Planner cc: Stormwater Utility Streets File 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 occur. She also expressed interest in a bus stop near the intersection of Harmony Road and Seneca St. c. see'attached site plan 9. Poudre Fire Authority - a second point of access for fire only has been provide, to be consistent with the ODP. 10. Parks Planning Department - noted. 11. Current Planning Department - noted. 12. noted. 13. noted. 14. noted. Submittal information: • Application Form and filing fee • 2 APO lists (one already submitted for neighborhood meeting) • Site Plan (30) • Subdivision Plat (23) _ • Architectural elevations (6) • Landscape Plan (20) • Statement of Planning objectives (26) • Transportation Impact Analysis (6) • Utility Plans (12) • Drainage and erosion control report (4) • Soils report (2) • ,Context Diagram (5) • Wetland report (2) • Copy of conceptual review letter (1) • Legal description (1) • Variance letter (1) • Off site easements (12 • LDGS points chart (1) Please review the attached information, should you have questions feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, JIM SELL DESIGN Inc. Brad Saucerman Landscape Architect H, Project Manager encl. • Policy AN-1.6 : Pedestrian Network. • Principle AN 2 : A wide range of open lands, such as small parks, squares, greens, play fields, natural areas, orchards and gardens, greenways, and other outdoor spaces should be integrated into neighborhoods.. • Policy AN-2.1 : Neighborhood Parks and Outdoor Spaces. Concept Review responses: (each numbered response correlates to the Concept Review letter dated 1. Zoning Department a. noted b. noted c. noted d. noted 2. Engineering Department a. Traffic study has been discussed with Eric Bracke, and updated accordingly b. noted c. noted d. noted e. noted f. noted 3. Light and Power Department 4. Water/Wastewater Department 5. Stormwater Utility a. noted b. noted c. noted d. 'the plan is being submitted to comply with the approved ODP e. noted f. noted ' 6. Natural Resources Department a. the project is being submitted under the LDGS, and has been designed to be consistent with the approved Harmony Ridge Phase I. b. the units along the Fromme Prairie are required to have a 50' separation between units, this has been maintained and is consistent with Phase I c. noted d. see note 6.b. e. please review the landscape plan as submitted. 7. Advance Planning Department - two connections have been provided to the trail to the trailhead parking lot to the west. 8. Transportation Planning Department a. see noted 2. a. b. GayLene Rossiter of Transfort indicated that future service is planned along Harmony road, however they are not sure when it will • Principle LU-1: Growth within thecity will promote a compact development pattern within a well defined boundary. • Policy LU-1.1: Compact Urban Form. • Principle T-4: Bicycling will serve as a viable alternative to automobile use for all trip purposes. • Policy T-4.2 : System Design. • Principle T-5: The City will acknowledge pedestrian travel as a viable transportation mode and elevate it in importance to be in balance with all other modes. Direct pedestrian connections will be provided and encouraged from place of residence to transit, schools, activity centers, work and public facilities. • Policy T-5.2 : Connections. • Policy T-5.3 : Continuity. • Principle T-6: Street crossings will be developed to be safe comfortable, and attractive. • Policy T-6.1 : Street Crossings. • Principle CAD-1 : Each addition to the street system will be designed with consideration to the visual character and the experience of the citizens who will use the street system and the adjacent property. Together, the layout of the street network and the streets themselves will contribute to the character, form and scale of the city. • Policy CAD-1.2 : Street Layout. • Policy CAD-1.3 : Streetscape Design. • Policy CAD-1.4 : Street Tree Design. • Principle CAD-2 : Public spaces, such as plazas, civic buildings, outdoor spaces, parks, and a gateway landscapes should be designed to be functional, accessible, attractive, safe and comfortable: • Policy CAD-2.2 : Public Space Design. • Principle ENV-5: Natural habitat/ecosystems (wildlife, wetlands, and riparian areas) will be protected and enhanced within the developed landscape of Fort Collins. • Policy ENV-5.1 : Protection and Enhancement. • Principle NOL-1 : Preserve and protect natural areas within Fort Collins and the Community Growth Management Area to provide habitat essential to the conservation of plants, animals, and their associated ecosystems and to enrich the lives of citizens by providing opportunities for education, scientific research, nature, interpretation, art, fishing, wildlife observation, hiking and other activities. • Policy NOL-1.1 : Natural Areas System. • Policy NOL-1.13 : Access. • Principle NOL-2 : Open lands are important in providing the city with a well- defined edge, establishing community separators, directing growth, and preserving rural character. • Principle AN-1 : New neighborhoods will be integral parts of the broader community structure. • Policy AN- 1.1 : Relationships to Residential Districts. • Policy AN-1.2 : Street Network. 14 December 2000 Ms. Steve Olt City of Fort Collins Planning Department 281 North College Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Harmony Ridge PUD Phase II Dear Steve: On behalf of our clients, Jim Sell Design, Inc. is submitting Harmony Ridge PUD Phase II to the City of Fort Collins, for Planning and Zoning approval under the Land Development Guidance System. This project is Phase II of an existing approved ODP. The ODP outlined the type of housing, development density and access points for this Phase of the project. It is this developments intent to conform to the ODP. The proposed plan consists of 123 Townhome units, taking access from Harmony Road through Phase I along Prairie Ridge Drive. The plans layout conforms with the existing topography, and steps down the slope to blend in with the terrain. A central park space provides an active recreation area accessed by walks along the street. The previously established density, unit type and required 50' separation between buildings along the Fromme Prairie, force the use of narrow private streets to access the units. A fire access onto Old Harmony Road as shown on the ODP, provides a second point of access to the project. The proposed units will be architecturally consistent with those approved for Phase I. The.project is proposed to be constructed as one phase. Property owners/developers: Mr. J.D. Padilla Mr. Chris Wells 3600 South College Ave. 1507 Buttonwood Dr. Fort Collins, CO 80525 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Mr. Mike Sanders Mr. Ron Wykftra 3600 South College Ave. 811 Casey Key Road Fort Collins, CO 80525 Nokimis FL 34275 The following letter will outline the projects compliance with the City of Fort Collins City Plan Comprehensive Plan Principles and Policies, address concept review comments, and outline the submittal of the project. Principles and Policies 153 WEST MOUNTAIN AVENUE FORT COLLINS, COLORAD080524 9704841921 FAX: 970 484 2443 E-MAIL: JIMSELL�FRILCOM