HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY RIDGE PUD, REPLAT OF LOTS 20, 21 & 22 AND A PORTION OF TRACT 7 - PDP - 49-95C - CORRESPONDENCE -13. A 20' easement in Tract A cannot be located.
Stormwater (Basil Harridan
14. Stormwater needs a revised grading plan and did not get one. This was stated
in the Staff comment letter dated October 19, 2000.
15. All staff comments have not been addressed. This item is not yet ready to be
scheduled for an administrative or a Planning and Zoning Board public
hearing.
This completes the staff comments at this time. Additional comments will be
forthcoming as they are received from City departments and outside reviewing
agencies.
Under the development review process and schedule there is a 90 day plan revision
submittal time -frame mandated by the City. The 90 day turnaround period begins
on the date of this comment letter (March 15, 2001) prepared by the project
planner in the Current Planning Department. Upon receipt, the revisions will be
routed to the appropriate City departments and outside reviewing agencies, with their
comments due.to the project planner no later than the third weekly staff review meeting
(Wednesday mornings) following receipt of the revisions. At this staff review meeting
the item will be discussed and it will be determined if the project is ready to go to a
public hearing before an administrative hearing officer or the Planning and Zoning
Board for a decision. If so, it will be scheduled for a date in the near future.
Please return all drawings red -lined by City staff with submission of your revisions. The
number of copies of revisions for each document to be resubmitted is on the attached
Revisions Routing Sheet. You may contact me at 221-6341 if you have questions about
these comments or would like to schedule a meeting to discuss them.
Sincerely,
0A
8eve Olt
Project Planner
cc: Engineering
Stormwater
Natural Resources
Harmony Ridge LLC
Project file #49-95C
4. Comments have not yet been received from Doug Moore and Kim Kreimeyer of
the Natural Resources Department. They do have significant concerns
regarding the placement and architecture of the buildings that would go on these
lots and how they relate to the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area. Please
contact Doug, at 224-6143, if you have questions about their concerns and
comments.
5. Mark McCallum of the Engineering Department stated that the applicant must
address the comments shown on red -lined plans. Also, address the comments
from Technical Services. A current, revised grading plan must be submitted to
the City for review.
6. Basil Hamdan 'of the Stormwater Utility is asking that the applicant please
provide a revised grading plan if new grading is being considered with these new
building envelopes. Please see comments on red -lined plans.
7. A representative of Public Service Company stated that trees may not be
planted within 4' of gas lines or gas mains in the existing utility easement.
The following general concerns were discussed at the Staff Review Meeting on March
7, 2001:
Planning
8. The final replat will be approved by the Director of Planning. The signature block
on the plat should read ....... Approved by the Director of Planning of the City of
Fort Collins....." and undersigned by the Director of Planning, not the City
Clerk. This was stated in the Staff comment letter dated October 19, 2000.
Also, delete the sentence "Witness my hand and seal ......... 2001 ". It is
irrelevant.
Engineering (Mark McCallum)
9. A revised grading plan is needed and must be submitted to the City for review
10. The Vicinity Map does not have enough information. Such things as zoning on
this and adjacent properties, the Cathy Fromme Prairie Natural Area, the Ridge
residential development to the east, and residential development to the north
need to be on the map. This was stated in the Staff comment letter dated
October 19, 2000.
11. The subdivision plat still contains a number of errors.
12. The subdivision plat and legal description do not close.
Commu. y Planning and Environmental vices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
March 15, 2001
TST, Inc.
c/o Rich Dvorak
748 Whalers Way — Building D
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Rich,
Staff has reviewed your documentation for the revisions for Harmony Ridge PUD,
Replat of Lots 20, 21, and 22 that was submitted to the City on February 12, 2001,
and would like to offer the following comments:
1. Dennis Greenwalt of AT&T Broadband stated that they have no comments or
concerns regarding this replat.
2. Mike Spurgin of the Post Office stated that they have no comments or concerns
regarding this replat.
3. The Technical Services (Mapping/Drafting) Department offered the following
comments:
a. The subdivision plat and the legal description do not close. Several
courses do not match between the plat and legal.
b. A 20' easement in Tract A cannot be located.
C. The notes "Prior Lot Lines" on the subdivision plat do not point to
anything.
d. The Point Of Beginning tie on the subdivision plat does not match the
legal description.
Please contact Jim Hoff, at 221-6588, if you have questions about these
comments.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020