Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY RIDGE - OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 49-95 - CORRESPONDENCE - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (6).; November 17, 1995 Page two consider such a berm. We would also consider assisting with planting trees for screening purposes. If you are interested in pursuing these issues we would be happy to discuss them with you further. 2. We are concerned about minimizing the light in your development near The Ridge. As you are no doubt aware we have no street lights and the majority of residents enjoy the feeling of living in the country which would be reduced if there were substantial lighting. We are aware that the city ordinarily imposes certain lighting requirements. We were able to persuade the City to minimize its lighting requirements for the Westbury Subdivision (which is immediately East of The Ridge). We would hope that a similar arrangement could be negotiated for Harmony Ridge. 3. We remain concerned about the elevation of the houses that will be built on the lots adjacent to The Ridge. We believe that all reasonable action should be taken to minimize the elevations. If two story homes are necessary, a reduced roof pitch would reduce the overall elevation. L. Please feel free to contact me to discuss any of these matters. My office pone number is 482-4710. My home phone number is 223-6355. Very t ly yours, ,��� Stephen E. Howard President Ridge Homeowner's Association SEH:sb enclosure xc: Steve Olt THE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION .4600 Regency Drive Fort Collins, CO 80526 November 17, 1995 Joe Vansant Positive Environments, Inc. P.O. Box 98 Fort Collins, CO 80522 Dear Joe: I am writing on behalf of The Ridge.Homeowner's Association. Bob. Kulovany informed me that you had requested copies of our covenants. The covenants have been amended twice so it is difficult to compile the formal recorded covenants. Enclosed for your information is an unofficial merging of the original covenants with the amendments. As I believe I mentioned to you at the neighborhood meeting there are some things we would have done differently if we were starting from scratch when we did the amendments but given that we had existing covenants to deal with we decided to limit the changes to those thing which really needed to be changed. In any event, I hope these will be of use to you. I would also like to make a couple of comments relative to your proposed Harmony Ridge PUD. I have reviewed the staff comments and the revised plans which you submitted to the city on November 11 1995. It does not appear that there are any changes which are significant to The Ridge residents since your original proposal. We were happy to see that the city did not request that you have access into The Ridge as that was the single issue which the homeowners felt most strongly about. There are a couple of other points which I would like to emphasize (or re-emphasize) as concerns of The Ridge: 1. We would like to have as much of a buffer as possible between our neighborhood and your. development.. We, of course, would like the buffer to be as aesthetically pleasing as possible. We prefer not to have a privacy fence but instead a berm and/or trees for screening purposes. While it does not appear. that there is enough room on your lots to have berms without affecting the building envelopes, we would consider allowing a berm to extend onto Ridge property if you are willing to