Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
JEFFERSON COMMONS PUD - FINAL - 50-95A - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS
tRECEIVEO JUN 2 1 1996 1008 Measwbrock Dr. Fort Collins, CO 80521 June 19, 1996 Michael Ludwig City Planner Dear Mr. Ludwig: I appreciate your holding a public hearing on a proposed project in my neighborhood. My main objection to Jefferson Commons PUD-Final, #50-95A is that it will increase the traffics on Elizabeth Street and it is already too dense. Thank you for considering my opinion. Sincerely, Laurence W. Cor 0 jF.F'F'ER*1 COW VAOMS P. v.D. , �No►�- , 50-95 A Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA I APPL1CAeL=CRITERIA ONLY CRIT=RION $ :he c-aenon aeC�iacte7 Mu the =enar be satisfied? If no, please explain 3 s Yes INo A.1. COMMUNI T Y-WIDE CRITERI, A. 1.1 Solar Onentation I IV 11 I 1.2 Camorehensive Plan 1 I 11,4I 1.3 Wildlife Habitat 114 1.4 Mineral Depcsit i I I beT I I 1•, 1.6 E Iocic_Ily Sensitive Areas I :ierve� I Lands cf Acric.iltural Imocranca I 1.7 Enercv Conservation I I 1.8 Air Qualitv I 1 I I 1.S Water Quality I I LAI I I 10 S=-w2ce =_r,e VV=_stes I I I 1 11 Water Conervati i.12 ResideniialDensity N�,LpEORHOCD CQMP:2TIEILITY CRITERIAI I I 2.1 Vettic::iar. Ps,-ns ran. Bike Tr_nsocration i t I I I 2 3uiicinc Pacer ent and Orient_ticr IVT I I I Natural Futures I I I I 2- Venicular Circulation anc Parking I I10dri, I I I 2.5 Emerges-C/ Acc-ass - I I I 2.�5 recestrian Circulation I I I I I 2.7 Arc-itecwre I I I I I 2 ?' Building Heicni and Views I lid I 141 1 `2.S : Shading I I IeT I I I 2.10 Bohr Access I Iw4f 1 I 2.41 Historic ReseurcSs I I I W009I 2.12 Setbacks I I 2.13 L _ndscace 10 1 I I 2.14 S i c n s I I I I I 2.1.5' Site Lighting I I Vr tvf I 2.16 Ncise and Vibration I I I 2.1 7 Glare or Heat I I I I 2.18 Hazardous Materials I I A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity I 1000r, 1I 3.2 Design Standards lie IVI I 3.3 Water Hazards � 3.4 Geologic Hazards Ito I Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins. Colorado. Revised94 uC5� I '�'--_. _.__...._-.. 4�..a• 'r.. ........- .. .....-_:r _. ._.ate ......____. - -._.ad /� CARPORT SECTION I�• I�C`.I--O" OGVBLE-LONOEO CARPORT SECTION V ID'•I'b- SINSLE-LOMEP SIDE ELEVATION /�FRONT/REAR ELEVATION ��„181DE ELEVATION II va".I--O' CO�.9LE-LOrcEC IW I:a'.v.o' 'Jb.9LEi.0A�JEC FRONT/REAR ELEVATION 6 SIDE ELEVATION I vB-. r-O^ slrvoLE-LonvEo vD"n o" slwsLE-LOAc'Er le L T o ea �A'.�'I'x• 4SIDE ELEVATION 3 x-1 . ?IAIWN6•JAGE5 , CARPORT FLOOR PLAN •+ a ,,.c LYAIe1.Ei.0ARD t I a A14. vpm. • W lmn CARPORT FLOOR PLAN A e 'AI♦ NA 1i I �MI- '.s• I.y+� J tmr•r�yM FRONT ELEVATION �• SLALE I/D' � I b' •.e •eu...w.e. i.au.mn w. ,/,1MAINTENANCE 9UILDING 13or13 A1.4 ' x p0']61: • �:t Sl I j 0.l AI OI .I a. 1I y Y Y GI N Y 00 A, i. o. OI P, le Ai Y 0.1�� 4 i0 p0 l'� •'0 Y• A• Y 6i 0• y Y N 0.• I.O . 5�• ) • ) I I , i ) �lpI(�I Il I ) , ,�, ]I/)I)I }i,1 i ) 1 • • J l 11 l I : .V ' •' .��`y.l-{J�yi"f.�•p. ! { ]N.I rl, VA D ) , m ® • I i �.•. _ �a._ die s �j � I l -' - i3• � ¢ ale J s ) �s mz. �R- L xbeY , EF ---- - -J S GYI)1��C• Y 0• 4 p1 0.. e• Y 01 1L AO N N S00'}S )I-( 9])ll SM L.EWND \ .TL L a.rL•ti, M y aa1. I. ,u .r+.tl wu ae)sry JM,W w.N•l•s © ••°'•'�� . r.,r••„ws n.Rr 1 WAR 4M,e, a f1( r•/+,Mlry O/ YJY &SITE PLAN - MEP .-..— . •••---..,...n..— Nmr. wr 0 ar•r� RBRR W LWUSLIP[ PLANS � )rpame,wr O ,rr,N�rr MR ApEUE N EIECTRICAL •�aa.a1. 0..'al naw aA Qn ..�.c..�yr REGUIREYEN]S rKriu,t�• • .•.sv,.r O�•w••r. 11 2 O aO "y 2 W O 6e� n e'n.''in♦ n Ol. r]c •-5�R4 95239 .LL.IZrc.1D FORT COLLINS - STUDENT HOUSING A DEVELOPMENT OF J.P.I. CROSS SECTION AT THE WEST BOUNDARY n . , o. k� K rNers NaF13 I �reF " +s" a-_ • t ,��.. s m CsENERAL �^i 4 SITE PLAN NOTES or TO LIVIL MY PM µt MI MPWM are L Sal '� � •• ., I L � ..vlxe. nwsm r�oae e�tvrau,vo wum�ae IMn lei �ow+u.�l ew�eo B%SLOPEAxJ. 6 wscnPE wx P�us 51 .a ,o u.oaraHPJ soew,us. iwraxJ.nHs Juc 14we,.noH TRASH XNC1.OSURW PLAN -....• . ..—..— 38 39 50, 39 A m � • ' ' eE u w a un. uw * I" WJ l L Nr e_ ve=e wne IS 0.^» SQ2 ,N9 9DD Sa cI BBSL Ios'1 313D u CH 55= Id6l ISl6, w oI ,B3 II TISo M OIw ,BSp !24 1D01O IVS 313)b SF MNR hYIYKR LLLO ,3fI SICJD, M W,I4r. soo Sieee, vP LEGEND _-DEMo1E5 WRDI%$MRIBC4 — YI� ceJcrrs mLIDxe ^me E% nos ,we vI I: 1 WtGtit OP PMKMS SiJy,1,5 1 TIUBH K IwrORLrcLE P4WN6 p BILYLLE PMU"JXG � a 4ww y AiLEXHBWT'PV.IIKIIG 0 P.acae r� 1 IJ . ; -1e_ 1 4 CURB RAMP PLANMl el4DIW nP6 )A i 9.QU6 I •P �p rj� SJrore*.I. ynylro cone o,.+ I x,LLE I. so' �NANDIGAP SIGN ��NANDICAPPEC ACCESS AQEA STALL Po% y¢rnw.s c4oz . 4P son _ _ - 10 or 13 A 1.1 ac-r u+u �mmems eovraeeroa w+�.a rr eca�nVe �e+.cw sm / � S 3 x mao.w sim.w�n xi s>m �� wL I . xi eim ems yr • Y x wi'h I ajgvN GaID 111 CIIIF : _ I_ _ P: w waryuo�s f d• P6M. CwIL 4v^+1G x ER L FENCE ��WROUGHT IRON PERIMETER FENCE 11 6R'CK roL;MJ . J wa.'7 PEA%GE .L+- F2hIGE. Uj LRJ nxv .w --.. • w..a U exevn.wx xwx. w+ rP -c+D- � su.x : �!: c Z Oo O C ll O `IYf 6rxG,m Oro O-c- 'n G z W WrcwSn qAw, aG. ,Habit O Q � —_ Ixo wi.r W a ° W o w�aD `c'�s i.� ax..�emawl W <pLec�- wu 7iFlxW - 6n.YAJ�s4D. 014F -TI it SCALE y �a xmm i!' I DAT E ✓ sm�cv tx+^j�S. lad Bqe Px11Nn w �� RI STUDENT HOUSING - PORT COI.L@IS I[1 � 1 iPill, TVPIe -- --- xa____ •-•••-• ti. • -4 iWm. r [ - I I ❑F17=❑�4 n..o m.mm N rr b P % 8 RIGFIT ELEVATION - CLUBHOUSE YE rl p. - ---------------------- II --------------- ® 9 - BOF13 LEFT ELEVATION - GLUBF40UBE w. x. E. CHA IL x wx 8 .— I- 8 i ��I IENIIIiiEill�i llMit iE�i y� 96�E�i�i�ii g 1�4 �1REAR ELEVATION - CLUBF40U" i FRONT ELEVATION - CLUBI40U6E RI STUDENT NOUSMO-FORT COLLMS "_1a 1 km mw j 7DE13 CH.3 IPI STUDENT HOUSWG- FORT COLLINS "r�see'0r•�wnm .. vu wem.i 61DE ELEVATION - BUILDING TYPE VI -A < VI-5 �Z Lu 6 oP13 A4.1 MI SRR THOFISMG - FORT COLLMS Ql BI M. r za.. 2 SIDE ELEVATION - BUILDING TYPE v CRONT ELEVATION - BUILDING TYPE V 5oF13 :A4.0 i'N" uN4WGr D1jr "rO Ae'w.Y ni�..rrWr rr.+I..s�IW....�r sRo RAre RErt RIx Deren. I } TYPE v52 .�...-+....�..r...W..�:,....lw-�� • ]w !'1N � r.r�:. per . } f dA .V/Y.l•S Aw 0 v' fa 1KN ® lr% �/ /JPdEA '•Ir ww �;r��:a �+r r> a �W-Awr m.Mx lMI CYRxNr� � � WV'srw nr.��M W'•n. a p pw.rM If Yi hm i 45W('bfNfY M. r.r r p. r'wil a..w...awrr r _ ♦S9eex ?per INFORMATION a_dRNAnux w OOL t CENTER :.. �e�.... r . n.•-a ... w x M1 p-nNNYNM . o � rr M .YWNI .WW J-BYeYIVI NY i). Imo 1Y'NANINM :.. q Y. b nil �: .Wry n .. n yD ea-amvnux n II APNMN ll. TIM JYAHI6R I / :. JSxYn'xFfNY A-1M'JYN/MP :. r�iu: .�n....r..m. .r- n fr NrdNIRN •..:j ��. M - ?o.MYfY] )4VMEA w r iSNYRM!l A4l//4 :7. Jb •' •4 •6 a: wrxlr..rr.rW.r srau.:.... �. �Q1 O TYPE V .r"`�brr.rWrr... vi L1 z Z 'Z (!]x TYPE a.��mr� rn r.........�... O O V C�7 JOMY(NNS ]YNiPoA ro.W.vfi ✓xl .V. (rYrvuU wwlw�..��.`rrwrs Y.M.b r_, a a ENLARGED ENTRY/AMENITY AREA r.rrr.war..r CSR O Z 9GL6: 1' c yY'P il. u.Y.= Yr � •YYY ire Wy. w beef.• TI.I. TI. r_,. ap Ywr.ssrnwMc~M1 r.ip �.. r ry. r Ybrr�:{r rr eb�.•r.r..r. r e.rr✓- _ " P1ewIr IW �r�r lr1s f ? Y WYyr, SCALE RFD pydEARJ F wr [�..nr lYn..1Vx/M, N p WI JVY/KR w .� tiw.� dxNxxm xr ma Nw a upae !leyN TYPE vlimu TYPE Vcn-fe Ml #rI ] uN v.. InIMu . .Y/[YIGN/ I NM w.fYP 1-MUYwa.Wnry D4r CARYeaaY a roW me. � � hMery MY x..w .mWe T aMilY5. f0 -L ' M! IYA.MYr n IIUY� =P I.YC.IYY`/,rn I'BYplv6 6vIN ] ?tt eew,.,A ] ddYA4'/N6 hYN MREA / r r�:..i • y iix JYNmTR �R [/IaYFesreR l! 'Irl IS MJ.rmrr N✓IINA'b- J 9/FNx / dVAMIN/ MfN 3 .r:lU f1 Ilm W dUAMNe dYsv-., r I 4 TYPICAL BUILDING PLANTING PLAN TYPICAL BUILDING PLANTING PLAN / w.l. r.wr J : f .i0'w /oe F wam.m a-u.n srr !�.• �«.r rnmsr�wr W m. -!emlA r2em u/n rm:.ra srw i n! Lxru.! A!f! �$L.4 [F piA/ tIRIIA tl� IN.h mY Vb mu. n.r a.. Mr Vme Muoer Au cry NiY Ys pew.y Y WY Ss yp wY M n M WAlr u H u�s.Yixn .Yet w uw�w. -w.u,We a.on �� mYmwu �m+rY♦ Wm.0 � Y.w M.INY�f�y ��� meei4 Maslen. iWmYmlr .YleA enW yY� �Y�� l.arynmrir NAi.Yw�Yr�.e wW1.Y�m. w f 1r�. � e� Yl �IesaYe! e �e s Yin m.MrY.q� Y pqp n�Tmeb�Ypq. LWyrmm aATE ILd .4lnieYT�l FYI �G ?� 3 7 i � ddd A' I ,WO GI�YWR ��t�tl111 ` m tlNai s J 1 � .i..:' �� �� �G��.lw1 • 'Wool ll�ro�ll; '.•��•'' 1 I / � ����;�i pal ���;� �„ ! �► � ,, --- -- - i JEFFERSON COMMONS P.U.D. FINAL SITE PLAN p A DEVELOPMENT OF J.P.I. GL. w scAm a esc LE I w-w.0Fr REVISED TUNE 4.1996 2 of 13 JEFFERSON COMMONS P.U.D. A DEVELOPMENT OF J.P.I. ATTORNEY INDEX LEGEND PLANNING OWNER wvNrvev NY ixtl e1.Wplw wP xoxlxc Pexu or TxP cin %wM nu ..I.. Deus/W wF[BY L'WQIPY nut ]nitl SAtl xx[ wxNL Txt6 Is ro caRrSw t'xPT %11N wt or PYM wU W N[x89Y IBB_. 1 BS)XINNU nitl i1T19 19 TNtl P50PMm A. DBGCPI6w X6NNp1 1. SIONAIURE AND NOTAIRMI PLUS 1 fINAL 511E %AN T TRASH ENCWSUBE mC NQIDRCYCLE PARKING WLLIN6, W W. nl6 MY 4Y Iw_. IDm WMh116 OF P8)L PPoPYNSY OA6CA1 WU 11N TMiv 6In 'XTIA' nUt IM[ /. n[ �SWI%TINAS wU 81LTIUCx1ON8 PJt N U tlSPFr81:I811A0 i141 ntl (xMtlP6 w0 ]I-21111. 8N8 ®IAM B BICYPCLE PARKINGlOF1H U1 SAIL 65TN YW1- YIYPBRlY A6 COXOTHIFU IN C.6. X. 9'/J. xvRwll w DF w]n wn. . DE•fM.IANDSI•aPF.PLYN R RAN S STOP SIGN %CP . Or SNP rumINO w0 "I X➢ B. LAND USE ANALYSIS pY wY PYm00 aA.w Ae. n®. or xer v.\us.w e.P m WILYSXp 0.00 B.P i% PSOMAI.MO N. il, 6f➢.00 B.P. 19.1% %tV65 Y0 NIM ]l] e16.00 ➢. Y. _ .t.w\ UJv64PINE w ]PO.Ii).% B.I. .011 P Pe1.LIC OxZ'fs Be%D}I PIT6 PNPBP NmYMI ixJ OPOPWX %[nm 660 ®POCxU P ICOSaW]Pd ➢Y B6 WITSI !➢l 6 I1-BW NliTel • IS-e® 101 T6) • la el(16 SPMIP ATA4 Pw8tx0 NpU1PPPp BY NOe PAPRM BYF.®S P SPMPP Sl9 9PLL'PP Or NXl% YYW➢IYd rw[Zltl -T. [M6 tO aPpeM9 PIMCY LL.tf FYs2x4 PA o !C/NI x1xICV! VOVP Z008 m arAml mscrlo%W�N35. moss r ns.B% v.tl m/u aww Islmumvl an GENERAL NOTES ...I.NPww .•tl x[c]slwnw w. sirs—Arvw LEGAL d s.w.x IP io.r..o r Weer.W �urryo Fon Ldime,LwmShc.nmm,Suud GYme0u.4ry ma+ paxqularryebecnYCxum rolrowu esMwr%YWw.x.w LommmnnU nrrM fxar rl.rxne. Cm s WEVATR]NS WILDING TYPE A ELEVATIONS BUILDING TVPE VI T E ATONE CL_UBIj(xlw l BXVAWIM CLUB NOOSE ➢ r AND SHE DETAIIS 10 PARKING DISTRUBIITION PLAN 11 WEST BOUNDARY SITE SERION 12 ISITRIOR LIGHTING PI -AN IJ P ATONS CARPORTS AND SFRV IIWG VICINITY MAP SCAUI IN=Z OOD FT F RREIANEWN H ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE CONSULTANTS ENDIN9fA6 111. •vm DF W.MC Sl10MMVY5T 1161. ep aURE IW DN.IAS, TII m-wl-%u AM%ASE(K'IAtP3. MC ]M]IFK IKWY rl' COLLMP. CO 1]wf x PA➢Kfxs IArNaND min nP MWAIDN.n 1D.55P. SST rl/J.IIPA ®Aq1. XAlT.1.111 115 W SWALLOW W P! C9LLIXS. CO LSNOYAPM LANOOfiE1fiN PA0.TNFAG 1I.SBfiBCAVFS BD AUSTIN.T% SII.)x]-5400 REVISED JUNE 4. 19% R[VISED MAY 1, 199A a 1 of 13 9 •l ►i ffKel J1 1J1 Is] ►l [+`i 1110 Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A June 24, 1996 P&Z Meeting Page 8 such decision, until both the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made). If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 3, of the City Code, the "final decision" of the Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of dispute is presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final decision" shall be counted from the date of the Board's decision resolving such dispute. Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A June 24, 1996 P&Z Meeting Page 7 FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSION: The Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final is in substantial compliance with the approved Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Preliminary, #50-95. 2. The Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final meets the applicable All- Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. 3. The Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final provides additional open space, recreational areas, parking areas, and public facilities as are necessary to adequately serve the occupants of the development and to protect the adjacent neighborhood. 4. On April 8, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Board authorized an increase of the number of unrelated persons who may reside in individual dwelling units from three to four for each of the 120- 4BR units by a vote of 6-1. 5. The Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final is compatible with surrounding land uses. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A with the following condition: 1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D., plans for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (August 26, 1996) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A June 24, 1996 P&Z Meeting Page 6 Parking: The parking standards outlined in All Development Criteria A-2.4 would require a minimum of 427 parking spaces for the proposed bedroom per unit configuration. The Jefferson Commons P.U.D. currently shows 539 on -site parking spaces. This is a parking ratio of about 82% of the total bedrooms. This ratio is consistent with the parking ratio for the Fort Ram Village which also has four bedroom (4 person) units. Monitoring of the Fort Ram Village parking has proven this ratio satisfactory. Pedestrian/Transfort Access: Internal pedestrian connections are made to the existing bike/pedestrian lanes on West Elizabeth, Orchard Place and Plum Street, including a bike/pedestrian path east of the site that currently provides direct pedestrian access from the Sunray Apartments to the Cedarwood Plaza Shopping Center (King Soopers). A ten foot wide bike/pedestrian path along the north property line allows pedestrian access from Ponderosa through the site to Orchard Place on the east property line. A Transfort bus stop will be provided along W. Elizabeth Street at the entrance to the site. The pavement thickness and turning radii of the entrance drive and turn -around on the south side of the information/community center have been designed to allow Transfort access in the future if needed. 5. Natural Resources: There is an existing drainage channel which crosses the site, south of the proposed Orchard Place connection. The applicant has worked with the Natural Resources Department and the Stormwater Utility to preserve and enhance existing wetlands along this channel. Trash dumpster enclosures will include recycling bins. 6. Stormwater: All applicable Preliminary Stormwater design criteria have been met. 7. Water and Wastewater: The Water and Wastewater Utility and Poudre Fire Authority have determined that sufficient water volume and pressure will be maintained without the installation of pumps in each building. Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A June 24, 1996 P&Z Meeting Page 5 Trash enclosures will have reddish -brown brick corner pedestals, canvas tan colored 8" wide siding to match the residential buildings and wood (cedar) gates. Landscaping: The landscape plan consists of a mix of deciduous shade trees, deciduous ornamental trees, coniferous trees, shrubs, and sod. Foundation shrubs and trees are proposed around all buildings. There is a thirty foot wide, four foot high berm and landscaped buffer along the entire length of the western property boundary adjacent to the single-family residential neighborhood. A six foot high, wood fence is proposed along the west property line at the edge of the berm. Extensive plantings are proposed along the West Elizabeth Street frontage and sod, trees and shrubs have replaced the Orchard Place street connection. The entire north property line and the southern 500 feet of the east property line will each have a 6' high wood fence. The frontage along West Elizabeth Street will have a six foot high fence constructed of 3/4" wrought iron pickets on 6" centers with brick columns at approximately 24 feet intervals. Lighting: All proposed lighting is to be sharp cut-off, down directional, high pressure sodium fixtures. The parking areas will be lighted by 250 watt, 14 feet high pole mounted lights. The interior walkways will be lighted by 100 watt, 8' high pole mounted lights. The lighting plan submitted by the applicant indicates that all lighting levels will drop to zero at the property line. There is no exterior lighting of the tennis and basketball courts. 4. Transportation: Traffic Generation/Street Connections: There are three access points to the proposed Jefferson Commons development. The main entrance is on West Elizabeth Street. Secondary access points to the site are along the eastern property line at Plum Street and Orchard Place. There is no vehicular access to the site along the west property line. The Site Access Study indicates that at full development, approximately 1,880 trip ends will be generated at this site daily. It is expected that there will be 166 morning peak hour trip ends and 242 afternoon peak hour trip ends. All of the intersections which were studied will operate at a level of service "C" or higher at both the A.M. and P.M. peaks with only two exceptions. South bound left turns at the Elizabeth/Jefferson Commons entrance (automobiles leaving Jefferson Commons making a left onto W. Elizabeth) and the West Elizabeth and Taft Hill intersection will operate at a level of service "D". When approving the Preliminary P.U.D., the Planning and Zoning Board determined that the levels of service and traffic volumes were acceptable. Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A June 24, 1996 P&Z Meeting Page 4 Setbacks/Building Placements: As discussed at the time of Preliminary P.U.D. consideration, the applicant has mitigated the impact of building height, mass and scale to the existing single-family residential neighborhood which is adjacent to the west property boundary through the proposed setbacks, building placement and landscaping. The minimum setback of any residential building from the western property line is 110 feet. Only one of the three 24-unit buildings is located on the western half of the property. It is setback a minimum distance of 170 feet from the western property line. The other five buildings on the western half of the property are 12-unit buildings. The closest portion of any building on the eastern half of the property to the eastern property line that is adjacent to existing multi -family uses is 77 feet. Architecture: All of the multi -family residential buildings will have a maximum building height of approximately 38 feet. The ten (Type V) 12-unit buildings are approximately 115 feet long and 50 feet wide each. The three (Type VI) 24-unit buildings are approximately 165 feet long and 70 feet wide each. The lower eight feet of the residential buildings will be a khaki colored, 4" wide horizontal siding. The exterior wall above 8' will be a canvas tan colored 8" wide horizontal siding. The trim around the windows, corner boards and accent band between the 4" and 8" siding will be an off-white color. Arch features over the stairwells will be a constructed of a reddish -brown colored brick veneer. Balcony railings will be a teal green color. The buildings will have greyish -brown, high -profile, heavy dimensional, composition shingle roofs. The information/community center building will be predominantly 29' in height with a single cupola feature extending to approximately 39'. The building is approximately 100' long and 75 foot deep. The south (West Elizabeth) side of the building, and southern two-thirds of the east and west elevations will be a reddish -brown brick veneer with white/beige colored soldier course bands around the arched entry and windows. The north elevation and northern third of the east and west elevations will be a canvas tan colored 8" wide horizontal siding with white soffit and teal green shutters and trim. The building will have a greyish -brown high -profile, heavy dimensional composition shingle roof. The maintenance equipment building is approximately 30' x 20' and a maximum of 13' 8" in height. The sidewalls are approximately 8 1/2 feet tall and are constructed of a canvas tan colored 4" wide horizontal siding. The building will have a greyish -brown, high -profile, heavy dimensional composition shingle roof. The five carport structures containing 40 parking spaces will have a maximum height of 12 '/2 feet and will have greyish -brown, high -profile, heavy dimensional composition shingle roofs. I Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A June 24, 1996 P&Z Meeting Page 3 •The Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Preliminary, #50-95 provided additional open space, recreational areas, parking areas, and public facilities as are necessary to adequately serve the occupants of the development and to protect the adjacent neighborhood (grounds for authorizing an increase of the number of unrelated persons who may reside in individual dwelling units from three to four for each of the 120- 4BR units); and •The Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Preliminary, #50-95 was compatible with surrounding land uses. Final Planned Unit Development Plan This is a request for Final P.U.D. approval for 192 multi -family student housing dwelling units (120- 4BR, 36- 3BR, and 36- 2BR) on 15.86 acres, a residential density of 12.11 dwelling units per acre. The request is in substantial compliance with the approved Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Preliminary, #50-95 and meets all applicable All -Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System (LDGS). The applicant has deleted the street (vehicular) connection of Orchard Place through the site as required by the Board's condition of Preliminary P.U.D. approval. 3. Design: Layout: The proposed layout consists of ten 12-unit buildings (noted as Type V on the Site Plan), three 24-unit buildings (noted as Type VI on the Site Plan), an information / community center, five carport structures (40 parking spaces), a maintenance equipment building, outdoor pool, a sand volleyball court, two tennis courts and a basketball court. The residential buildings and information/community center are placed in a manner that creates a common, activity area in the center of the site with parking on the perimeter. The applicant deleted the street (vehicular) connection of Orchard Place through the site as required by the Board's condition of Preliminary P.U.D. approval. A ten foot wide bike/pedestrian path along the northern property line will connect Orchard Place (east of the site) to Ponderosa Drive (west of the site). Orchard Place between the west property line and Ponderosa Drive is to be vacated and removed. Vehicular access to the site is gained from West Elizabeth Street (south property line); Plum Street (east property line); and Orchard Place (east property line). No vehicular access from/to the site is available along the west property line. Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A June 24, 1996 P&Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS Background: The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: R-L; existing single-family residential. M-L: existing mobile home park (Skyline). S: R-L; existing single-family residential. R-L-M; existing multi -family (Stadium Apartments). R-M; existing multi -family (Stadium Apartments). E: R-M-P; existing multi -family (Sunray Apartments). B-P; existing commercial (West Elizabeth Plaza). W: R-L; existing single-family residential. This property was annexed into the City as part of the West Elizabeth Annexation on February 14, 1963 and the West Fort Collins Annexation on August 10, 1967, and is zoned R-L, Low Density Residential. 2. Land Use: Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan On April 8, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Board granted Preliminary P.U.D. approval for 192 multi -family student housing dwelling units (120- 4BR, 36- 3BR, and 36- 2BR) on 15.86 acres by a vote of 6-2, with a condition that there be no vehicular connection of Orchard Place across the property. The Board authorized an increase of the number of unrelated persons who may reside in individual dwelling units from three to four for each of the 120- 4BR units by a vote of 6-1. The Planning and Zoning Board made the following findings of fact: *The Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Preliminary, #50-95 earned 116.5% of the maximum applicable points on the Residential Uses Point Chart of the L.D.G.S., exceeding the minimum required 100% for a residential density of 12.11 dwelling units per acre (92.5% of the points were earned from base/locational criteria); •The Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Preliminary, #50-95 met the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System including A-2.5 "Emergency Access" and A-2.6 "Pedestrian Circulation" as the applicant abandoned their request for a "gated" community; ITEM NO. 8 MEETING DATE 6/24/96 STAFF Mike Ludwig PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD J STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Final, #50-95A. APPLICANT: Gefroh-Hattman Architects 145 W. Swallow Road Fort Collins, CO 80525 OWNER: JPI Texas Development, Inc. P.O. Box 619208 Dallas, Texas 75261-9208 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for Final P.U.D. approval for 192 multi -family student housing dwelling units (120- 4BR, 36- 3BR, and 36- 2BR) on 15.86 acres, a residential density of 12.11 dwelling units per acre. On April 8, 1996 the Planning and Zoning Board authorized an increase of the number of unrelated persons who may reside in individual dwelling units from three to four for each of the 120- 4BR units by a vote of 6-1. The property is located on the north side of West Elizabeth Street, west of Taft Hill Road, west of the existing Kentucky Fried Chicken and is zoned R-L, Low Density Residential. RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval with a condition. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This request for Final P.U.D. approval: *is in substantial compliance with the approved Jefferson Commons P.U.D., Preliminary, #50-95; *meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System; *provides additional open space, recreational areas, parking areas, and public facilities as are necessary to adequately serve the occupants of the development and to protect the adjacent neighborhood; and •is compatible with surrounding land uses. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 2.21-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT