Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFTC CHIPPERS SC WTE VERIZON PDP - PDP170027 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSto allow access to the transit facility to the west of this proposal. Please contact Seth Lorson to follow up. Email- slorson@fcgov.com Phone- 970-416-4320 Per our conversations at the staff review meeting, Transfort thought that the name "FTC CHIPPERS" was in reference to the Chippers bowling alley which is located adjacent to the transit facility. This proposal is for a property north of the Chippers Bowling alley and the transit facility so it is no longer applicable to this project. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: The anticipated change in traffic volume is not expected to rise to the threshold of needing a TIS. Based on section 4.2.3.D of LCUASS, the Traffic Impact Study requirement can be waived. Thank you for your review and comments. Department: Zoning Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 O8/15/2017: The antenna mounted on the outside of the existing pole is not stealth. The antenna needs to be mounted inside a pole so it is concealed. The proposed antenna has been converted from a side mount to an interior mount at the top of the new light pole. The antenna is now concealed. Comment Number: 2 08/15/2017: Where is the landscape plan? A landscape plan page has been added to the drawings (page Z-5). However, Verizon is not proposing any new landscaping so the existing and proposed plans are the same. The existing shrubs have been added. Because we will now be implementing a remove and replace technique to the existing light pole, the light pole will be in the same location as the exiting pole and thus no additional ground space would be impacted. With that said, any potential damage to the existing shrubs as part of this drop and swap will be relocated or replaced accordingly to bring the overall conditions of the landscaping to a level that was the same or better than the pre -installation conditions. A note to this effect has been added to pages Z-3, Z-4, and Z-5. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmoaen@fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/02/2017 08/02/2017: The proposed site changes shown in this submittal are not substantial enough to trigger Stormwater requirements; therefore, no requirements apply at this time. If future submittals include site or grading changes that are not shown on these plans, please contact Dan Mogen in Water Utilities Engineering at (970)224-6192 or dmogen@fcgov.com to coordinate and determine what requirements, if any, will apply. Thank you for the review and comments. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: All plan sheets must be24"x36". Verizon will submit any requested hard copy in 24" X 36" format. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: A legal description of the property where this equipment is located will need to be added to sheet T1. Legal description has been added. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Sheet titles and sheet index have been updated accordingly. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Line over text issues have been resolved. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: There is text that needs to be rotated 1800. See redlines. The text in reference is difficult to shown rotated 1800 due to the space constraints on the site plan. We are experimenting with possibly a foot notation in lieu of the comment call outs regarding the existing utility easements. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn@fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: Transfort is interested in obtaining a pedestrian easement through this property Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: With respect to a wireless telecommunication facility that is a tower or a monopole, the setback of the facility from the property lines shall be one (1) foot for every foot of height. However, to the extent that it can be demonstrated that the structure will collapse rather than topple, this requirement can be waived by the Director. In addition, the setbacks for ground -mounted wireless telecommunication equipment shall be governed by the setback criteria established in Articles 3 and/or 4. The closest property line to the existing and future light pole is the south property line. That distance is 41'-2" and is shown on page Z-1. This meets the one (1) foot for every foot of height setback requirement with additional buffer room. Therefore, all other property line dimensions will also meet the setback requirements. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: Please include a complete landscape plan. There are existing plants missing from this view (shrubs). Landscape screening is required; see comments to follow. A landscape plan page has been added to the drawings (page Z-5). However, Verizon is not proposing any new landscaping so the existing and proposed plans are the same. The existing shrubs have been added. Because we will now be implementing a remove and replace technique to the existing light pole, the light pole will be in the same location as the exiting pole and thus no additional ground space would be impacted. With that said, any potential damage to the existing shrubs as part of this drop and swap will be relocated or replaced accordingly to bring the overall conditions of the landscaping to a level that was the same or better than the pre -installation conditions. A note to this effect has been added to pages Z-3, Z-4, and Z-5. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: Coniferous landscaping needed around the base of fence. (3.8.13(C)(4) The fence has been removed. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: Fence needs to be setback from the concrete curb so that car doors can swing open when using the space. After the Staff Review Meeting it was discussed that the equipment could potentially be moved to the center of the landscape island so that the fence may only obstruct where the nose of the vehicle would be located. The previously proposed ground equipment has been relocated to be inside the light pole. Therefore, the fence has been removed and this eliminates the car door conflicts entirely creating a much better overall design for the small cell colocation. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: Because we are asking for coniferous plants around the base of the fence, will it be possible to reduce the size of the enclosure? If not, please provide explanation. The fence has been removed and no new landscaping is proposed. > IFC 505.1: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible, visible from the street or road fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of six-inch numerals on a contrasting background. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Per conversations at the staff meeting, Cal noted that he held additional conversations with the department, and they were fine with using the existing address for the property and that typical Verizon signage on/near the pole was sufficient. Department: Planning Services Contact: Kai Kleer, 970-416-4284, kkleer@fcoov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: Several corrections need to be made on the Proposed South Elevation. See corrections on plan set. South elevation is actually the west elevation. Diagram titles have been updated. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 08/16/2017: Fence cannot exceed six feet in height . Please reduce height. (3.8.13(C)(5). Ground equipment will be installed within the pole. Therefore, the fence has been removed. By removing the fencing, we have also removed all of the car door conflicts that were previously mentioned. We believe this change is one that greatly decreases the aesthetic impacts of this small cell colocation project. Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 Can the equipment be located in -ground? This would eliminate the need for a fence and the majority of landscaping. Unfortunately, underground tower equipment is extremely risky to install both from a safety standpoint and an operational one. However, we were able to place the formerly proposed ground equipment within the new light pole towards the base and the fence has been removed. Because of this, we will need to remove and replace the existing light pole in order to have a pole that is structurally capable of supporting the now interior, concealed antenna and accessory radio equipment. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/16/2017 This proposal does not employ "stealth" technology. It will be required to locate the antenna inside the light pole. If unable to do on existing pole, a new one may be erected on the same location of the existing pole. The antenna should be seamlessly integrated with the pole and maintain the previous height of the existing structure. If replacement of the light pole is required please ensure that the light fixture meets all requirements outlined in code section 3.2.4. The proposed antenna has been converted from a side mount to an interior mount at the top of the new light pole. The new light pole is 35', which is the same height as the existing light pole that we are removing and replacing. We will need to remove and replace the existing light pole. The light fixture meets or exceeds all requirements in code section 3.2.4. Department: PFA Contact: Cal Sheesley, 970-416-2599, csheeslev@ooudre-fire.ora Topic: General Comment Number: 1 08/15/2017: FIRE LANES Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 Fire access is required to within 150' of all exterior portions of any building or facility as measured by an approved route around the perimeter. When measured from McClelland, the proposed communications site meets access requirements. Code language follows: > IFC 503.1.1: Approved fire Lanes shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. When any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus access, the fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension if the building is equipped throughout with an approved, automatic fire -sprinkler system. Thank you for the review and comments. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: WATER SUPPLY Hydrant spacing and flow must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. A hydrant is required within 300' of any Commercial Building as measured along an approved path of vehicle travel. The proposed communications site appears to be located 500' from the nearest hydrant located at the northwest Mason and Horsetooth. Due to the scope and nature of the development, water supply requirements will not be enforced on this project. Code language follows: COMMERCIAL REQUIREMENTS > IFC 507.5 and PFA Policy: Hydrants to provide 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter Thank you for the review and comments. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: ADDRESS POSTING & WAYFINDING The address shall be posted on the proposed structure to aid in wayfinding. Per Google Earth, it is unclear if signage requirements have been met an additional signage may be deemed necessary at time of inspection. Code language follows: Department: Light And Power Contact: Coy Althoff, 970-224-6150, CAlthoff@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: Light & Power has existing facilities in this area that could be utilized to service this type of a commercial service. There is a 150 kVA pad -mount transformer to the N.W. of the proposed location and there is also a 300 kVA pad -mount transformer to the S.W. of the proposed location. Per Light & Power's recommendations, the site plans have been revised to include a new electrical route northwest from the lease area to the existing 150KVA transformer. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: Please note that with regard to commercial services, Light & Power is not responsible for the secondary electric system. If you haven't already, you will need to engage an electrical engineering firm/ contractor to perform the design work and then coordinate with Light & Power engineering and metering dept. Thank you for the review and comments. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: Any changes to the existing electric capacity and or location will initiate system modification charges. Please coordinate power requirements with Light and Power Engineering at 221-6700. Thank you for the review and comments. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and Power Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1 Form.pdf Verizon will provide a one -line diagram as part of the building permit application. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: As your project begins to move forward please contact Light and Power Engineering to coordinate the transformer and electric meter locations, please show the locations on the utility plans. Per Light & Power's recommendations, the site plans have been revised to include a new electrical route northwest from the lease area to the existing 150KVA transformer. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 08/15/2017 08/15/2017: You may contact FCU Light & Power, project engineering if you have questions. (970) 221-6700. You may reference Light & Powers Electric Service Standards at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStandards_F I NAL_18November2016_Amendment.pdf You may reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers. Thank you for the review and comments. Comment Number: 3 08/14/2017 Comment Originated: 08/14/2017: If lighting updates will be incorporated into this development: note that especially for LED light fixtures, cooler color temperatures are harsher at night and cause more disruption to circadian (biological) rhythms for both humans and wildlife. Warmer color temperature (warm white, 3000K or less) for any LED light fixtures is preferred. Please also consider fixtures with dimming capabilities so that light levels can be adjusted as needed. Site light sources shall be fully shielded and down -directional to minimize up -light, light spillage and glare [see LUC 3.2.4(D)(3)]. For further information regarding health effects please see: hftp://darksky.org/ama-report-affirms-human-health-impacts-from-leds/ Verizon is proposing to install (1) new Slenderform 48 LED, 240V lights. They are fully shielded and down -directional. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/14/2017 08/14/2017: If any trees are to be impacted during construction or as part of this development: note LUC Section 3.2.1(C) requiring developments to submit a landscape and tree protection plan, and if receiving water service from the City, an irrigation plan, that: "...(4) protects significant trees, natural systems, and habitat, and (5) enhances the pedestrian environment." Note that a significant tree isdefined as a tree having DBH (Diameter at Breast Height) of six inches or more. If any of the trees within this site have a DBH of greater than six inches, a review of the trees shall be conducted with Tim Buchanan, City Forester (970-221-6361 or tbuchanan@fcgov.com) to determine the status of the existing trees and any mitigation requirements that could result from the proposed development. No trees shall be impacted based on the proposed work. Department: Internal Services Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter@fcaov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 08/11/2017 08/11/2017: Construction shall comply with adopted codes as amended. Current adopted codes are: 2015 International Building Code (IBC) 2015 International Residential Code (IRC) 2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2015 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2015 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2015 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com/building web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2017. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 129vult or 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Thank you for the review and comments. City of Fort Collins August 17, 2017 Ryan Sagar LRK Consulting, LLC 1196 Grant St., Unit 313 Denver, CO 80203 RE: FTC CHIPPERS SC, PDP170027, Round Number 1 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 . fax fcgov. com/developmentreview Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Kai Kleer, at 970-416-4284 or kkleer@fcgov.com. •ut - Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcaov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 08/14/2017 Comment Originated: 08/14/2017: Generally, an Ecological Characterization Study (ECS) is required by Section 3.4.1 (D)(1) as the site is within 500 feet of a known natural habitats and features (New Mercer Canal and associated habitat). However, as there is intervening infrastructure between the feature and this property the ECS is waived for this site. Thank you for your review and comments. Comment Number: 2 08/14/2017 Comment Originated: 08/14/2017: If landscape updates are required with this development: note City of Fort Collins Land Use Code [Section 3.2.1 (E)(3)], requires that to the extent reasonably feasible, all plans be designed to incorporate water conservation materials and techniques. This includes use of low -water -use plants and grasses in landscaping or re- landscaping and reducing bluegrass lawns as much as possible. Native plants and wildlife -friendly (ex: pollinators, butterflies, songbirds) landscaping and maintenance are also encouraged. Please refer to the Fort Collins Native Plants document available online and published by the City of Fort Collins Natural Areas Department for guidance on native plants is: http://www.fcgov.com/naturalareas/pdf/nativeplants20l3.pdf. Also see the City of Fort Collins Plant List: https://www.fcgov.com/forestry/plant_list.pdf. No Landscape updates proposed.