Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutINTERSTATE LANDS REZONING - 55-95C - CORRESPONDENCE - CITY HALLGood Samaritan Village Rezoning The Planning and Zoning Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of an amendment to the City Structure Plan map changing the Good Samaritan Village property from a low -density mixed -use neighborhood designation to a medium -density mixed -use neighborhood designation; and to recommended approval of the requested change in zoning of 15.2 acres from the LMN, Low - Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood, Zone to the MMN, Medium -Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood, Zone. October 20, 1997 ul u 41 ' 11 1� TO: Mayor Azari and City Council Members TH: John Fischbach, City Manager Greg Byrne, Director of Community Planning and Environmental Services Joe Frank, Advance Planning Department Director FM: Ken Waido, Chief Planner RE: Planning and Zoning Board Recommendations on the Interstate Lands Rezoning and the Good Samaritan Village Rezoning On Thursday October 16, 1997, the Planning and Zoning Board conducted public hearings on the Interstate Lands Rezoning and the Good Samaritan Village Rezoning which are items on the City Council's October 21, 1997, agenda. The purpose of this memorandum is to forward the Board's recommendations concerning the rezonings to the Council Interstate Lands Rezonine The Planning and Zoning Board voted 7-0 to recommend approval of an amendment to the City Structure Plan map changing a portion of the Interstate Lands property from a low -density mixed -use neighborhood designation to an employment district; and to recommended approval of the requested zoning districts (26.9 acres of UE, Urban Estate; 15.7 acres of LMN, Low -Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood; 104.1 acres of E, Employment; and 44.9 acres of C, Commercial) with a condition that all development on the property must be processed under a Type 2 (Planning and Zoning Board) Review. The reason for the Board's zoning condition was to allow for their review of several key issues associated with the development of the property. Included in these key issues were transportation related issues, including improvements to Prospect Road; access from the property onto Prospect and the Frontage Road; and the potential connection of streets into existing residential developments to the west; drainage issues, including maintaining Boxelder Creek as open space; and mixed -use development issues, including residential units in close proximity to employment areas. The Board believes these issues will need to be closely evaluated when an Overall Development Plan (ODP) is proposed for the property.