Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PVH HEALTH SYSTEMS, HARMONY CAMPUS, 3RD FILING, PRIMARY CARE PLAZA - FDP - 32-98H - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY
�D Nlultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service - connectivity mudnnnn actual proposed 11 base connectivity: C 6 11 A -- specific connections to priority sites: 7 description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address T2 AU T Sc 6(00L destination area classification (see text) PV %Lt a ,�- L - - IMIMIMI P. 20 1 6�NPoP—A IDAT► - d. City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan N °� Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet III ID ID ❑© 'oject location classification:.- IPAA)S(T egglto2 e 5 �L Wker-pcz� (enter as many as appl description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address AoSiL.G k m6r- Pa i2K- CoAubo s//APrs 4) I-rejkor ,& 54C6kV4- ,• aGa ei PVt-s 4G �C r s-MUG destination area classification o^(see text) I�rySf tieu?��( �rD6U na I�vsntvT�atr level of service (minimum based on project location classification) airsaness .aninulry sV eH .�mangs s1311e1 imeresi & seaviry una Jli es ntironnun ?t> Q 4 L 6 actual. proposed C C C ®01®101©101 �Ol0lvl�lO �0101©101� �01 = 10101 ---------- ®�101�101� ®�I�Ivlvl� C• P. 18 City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA Z-7 v APPENDIX 2(o ,.HCS2000 -: .-.,signalized I ntersecti6ns•.. Rr -se-,4% ld'�� TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 4,Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2/2004 Analysis Time Period: am 6EM) Intersection: Harmony/Mobile Home Park Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent bkgrd total E Dr� Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: Mobile Home Park Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 35 Volume 110 1545 20 1990 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 120 1697 23 2211 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage TWLTL 3 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 2 1 Configuration L T R T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 75 Volume 10 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 11 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 1 Configuration R L R Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L R L R v (vph) 120 11 11 _8_8_ C (m) (vph) 240 674 84 475 v/C 0.50 0.02 0.13 0.19 95% queue length 2.56 0.05 0.43 0.67 Control Delay 34.1 10.4 54.2 14.3 LOS, D B F B Approach Delay 10.4 18.7 Approach LOS B C -r HCS2+000: sigrialifed''Inter'sectidns-RE-' ' se 4ld" TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ►Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2/2004 Analysis Time Period: m pm Intersection: armony/Mobile Home Park .Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgr total Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: Mobile Home Park Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 50 1820 35 1365 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 1895 41 1587 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -'- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 3 RT Channelized? No No Lanes 1 2 1 2 1 Configuration L T R T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 40 120 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 47 141 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 1 Configuration R L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I R 1 L R v (vph) 52 5 47 141 C(m) (vph) 465 660 160 742 v/c 0.11 0.01 0.29 0.19 95% queue length 0.38 0.02 1.15 0.70 Control Delay 13.7 10.5 36.6 11.0 LOS B B E B Approach Delay 10.5 17.4 Approach LOS B C 2¢ HCS2000:1L.''-s1gnalized Intersections Re se`s4:.1'd;• a , .'..:_ . , TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY %Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2/2004 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Harmony/RT Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor b k g r Iota Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: RT Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs)• Major Street: Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 L T R I L T 6 R 0.25 volume 1615 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1774 54 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound. Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 60 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 70 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration R Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 I R v (vph) 70 C(m) (vph) 610 v/c 0.11 95% queue length 0.39 Control Delay 11.7 LOS B Approach Delay 11.7 Approach LOS B 05 HCS210.00:'' ysignaIized -Intersections,: Re, use A,_Id .: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY .Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2/2004 Analysis Time Period pm Intersection: Harmony/RT Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd tota Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: RT Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 1890 70 0.96 0.95 1968 73 Undivided / No 2 1 T R Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 15 0.85 17 2 0 / 1 R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 I R I 17 606 0.03 ._` 0.09 11.1 B 11.1 B 22 HCS200.0:�o Signalized- Intersections --Rel.: se ,4...ld , Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. %Date: 8/22/03 Period: am Project IDm: 363me06 E/W St: Timberwood Drive Inter.: Timberline/Timberwood Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent 6hor bkgr total N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R • I I i I No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1185 5 40 175 10 265 145 625 20 175 930 145 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru Right Peds Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 1 A I NB Left A A 1 Thru A A 1 Right X I Peds I SB Left A I Thru A I Right X I Peds 5 6 7 8 A P P A A A P A P X NB Right A 1 EB Right A SB Right A A I WB Right A A Green 8.0 4.0 16.0 8.0 4.0 50.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 n 0 0 0 2 0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L .446 3433 0.49 0.13 41.3 D T 373 1863 0.02 0.20 32.1 C 37.9 D R 522 1583 0.09 0.33 23.2 C Westbound L 159 1770 0.55 0.09 47.7 D T 298 1863 0.04 0.16 35.6 D 33.8 C R 522 1583 0.60 0.33 29.8 C Northbound L 159 1770 0.33 0.09 43.9 D T 1770 3539 0.41 0.50 16.4 B 17.9 B R 997 1583 0.02 0.63 7.0 A Southbound L 446 3433 0.20 0.13 39.0 D T 1911 3539 0.57 0.54 15.6 B 15.8 B R 1124 1583 0.15 0.71 4.8 A Intersection Delay = 21.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Z( HCS2000 kg:nal'i'z'ed 'Interse'ctions• 'Re 1-1, e 14."1d: •: Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Timberwood Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 'Date: 8 22/03 Jurisd: Fort Collr' s Period: am pm Year recent shobkgrd otal Project ID: 0363me06 E/W St: Timberwood Drive N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes I 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1160 10 25 120 0 65 145 970 80 1215 500 55 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A Thru Right Peds Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 A NB Left A A I Thru A A I Right X I Peds I SB Left A I Thru A I Right X I Peds 5 6 A A A A A 7 8 P P P P X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A A 1 WB Right A A Green 8.0 4.0 16.0 8.0 4.0 50.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 446 3433 0.42 0.13 40.7 D T 373 1863 0.03 0.20 32.2 C 38.0 D R 522 1583 0.06 0.33 22.9 C Westbound L 159 1770 0.15 0.09 42.4 D T 298 1863 0.00 0.16 35.3 D 28.2 C R 522 1583 0.15 0.33 23.7 C Northbound L 159 1770 0.33 0.09 43.9 D T 1770 3539 0.64 0.50 20.3 C 20.3 C R 997 1583 0.09 0.63 7.3 A Southbound L 446 3433 0.56 0.13 42.4 D T 1911 3539 0.30 0.54 12.7 B 20.4 C R 1124 1583 0.06 0.71 4.4 A Intersection Delay = 22.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C secs Z 0 ;,:HCS2.00O:c gignaIized Intersect -ions Re.l..:....e"4•.ld .;:,- ,. .. :.,. Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas .Date: 8/22/03 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year recent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I I L T R I I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I I 1 I 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I 2 2 0 I 2 2 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L T R I Volume 1340 1210 240 1290 1460 355 1395 560 120 1335 645 525 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru P A I Thru A A Right P A 1 Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 15.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 12.0 15.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Cycle Length: 120.0 _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 458 3433 0.84 0.13 64.1 E T 1504 3539 0.91 0.43 37.1 D 38.5 D R 884 1583 0.31 0.56 9.6 A Westbound L 486 3433 0.64 0.14 51.3 D T 1534 3539 1.01 0.43 55.2 E 47.1 D R 884 1583 0.43 0.56 10.6 B Northbound L 486 3433 0.88 0.14 67.7 E TR 804 3446 0.92 0.23 60.5 E 63.1 E Southbound L 458 3433 0.79 0.13 59.8 E T 796 3539 0.88 0.22 56.2 E 55.0+ E R 620 1583 0.92 0.39 50.6 D Intersection Delay = 49.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D secs 0 -HCS2000•7"ignalized Intersections-Rel,---e .4.1d. Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/22/03 Jurisd: Fort Colli s Period: am=pm Year recent hort bkgrd total Project D• 0363me06 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes i 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I 2 2 0 i 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L T R I Volume 1260 1255 175 1200 910 390 1305 605 285 1420 405 295 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P 1 Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P A 1 Thru A A Right P A I Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X NB Right - 1 EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 12.0 36.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 17.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 372 3433 0.74 0.11 59.3 E T 1416 3539 0.93 0.40 42.3 D 41.7 D R 831 1583 0.22 0.52 11.3 B Westbound L 315 3433 0.75 0.09 62.5 E T 1357 3539 0.79 0.38 33.1 C 32.2 C R 831 1583 0.55 0.52 14.7 B Northbound L 458 3433 0.71 0.13 54.7 D TR 983 3369 0.96 0..29 61.9 E 60.1 E Southbound L 515 3433 0.85 0.15 62.5 E T 1091 3539 0.39 0.31 32.1 C 40.1 D R 712 1583 0.43 0.45 19.3 B Intersection Delay = 42.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS.= D APPENDIX C '. HCS2000:= "^s"igna,lized Intersections ;Re?" se 4:1d`: „ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY •Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2/2004 Analysis Time Period: am pm) Intersection: Harmony/Mobile Home Park Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort bkgrd otal Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: Mobile Home Park Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 110 1540 1985 35 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 120 1692 2205 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles. 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 3 RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 10 75 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L I I L R 120 11 88 243 107 475 0.49 0.10 0.19 2.52 0.33 0.67 33.5 42.5 14.3 D E B, 17.4 C 1( HCS2000': ' ^s'ignalized Intersect ions 1 Re -se '4: Td-. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROLSUMMARY `Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2/2004 Analysis Time Period pm Intersection: armony/Mobile Home Park Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: Mobile Home Park Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street: Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 ( 4 5 L T R I L T 6 R Volume 50 1815 1360 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR _ 52 1890 1581 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 3 RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 40 120 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 141 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L I I L R v (vph) 52 47 141 C(m) (vph) 468 198 747 v/c 0.11 0.24 0.19 95% queue length 0.37 0.89 0.69 Control Delay 13.7 28.8 10.9 LOS B D B Approach Delay 15.4 Approach LOS C HCS200-0:-=*Tns gnal •zed•Inter'sections :Re' se :4 1d.;,. .. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 4Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2/2004 Analysis Time Period: am 5 Intersection: Harmony/RT Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: RT Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1590 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1747 54 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 60 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 70 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I R I v (vph) 70 C(m) (vph) 610 v/c 0.11 95% queue length 0.39 Control Delay 11.7 LOS g Approach Delay 11.7 Approach LOS B HC52000 gnalized Intersections Re 4:1d' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2/2004 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: armony/RT Access Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: RT Access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Major Street: Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 L T R I L T 6 R volume 1850 70 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1927 73 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 2 1 Configuration T R Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration R Approach Movement Lane Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 I R I v (vph) 17 C(m) (vph) 606 v/c 0.03 95% queue length 0.09 Control Delay 11.1 LOS B Approach Delay 11.1 Approach LOS B 13 :.*.HCS2000: S°1nalized..Intersections Re1F�.s- 4.1d Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E %Date: 8/22/03 Period: am pm Project ID: 363me06 E/W St: Timberwood Drive Inter.: Timberline/Timberwood Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent short bkgrd total N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes i 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 2 1 I 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1185 5 40 165 10 230 145 620 15 170 930 145 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations_ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 EB Left A A I NB Left Thru A A I Thru Right A A I Right Peds X 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left Thru A 1 Thru Right A 1 Right Peds X I Peds 5 6 A A A A A 7 8 P P P P X NB Right A 1 EB Right A SB Right A A 1 WB Right A A Green 8.0 4.0 16.0 8.0 4.0 50.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Cycle.Length: 100.0 _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 446 3433 0.49 T 373 1863 0.02 R 522 1583 0.09 Westbound L 159 1770 0.48 T 298 1863 0.04 R 522 1583 0.52 Northbound L 159 1770 0.33 T 1770 3539 0.40 R 997 1583 0.02 Southbound L 446 3433 0.18 T 1911 3539 0.57 R 1124 1583 0.15 Intersection Delay = 20.7 0.13 41.3 D 0.20 32.1 C 37.9 D 0.33 23..2 C 0.09 45.5 D 0.16 35.6 D 32.0 C 0.33 28.0 C 0.09 43.9 D 0.50 16.3 B 18.0 B 0.63 6.9 A 0.13 39.0 0.54 15.6 0.71 4.8 (sec/veh) D B 15.7 B A Intersection LOS = C secs HCS2000r:1"-inalized Intersections Rel, 4.1d Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Timberwood Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas `Date: 8 22/03 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year recent shor bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 E/W St: Timberwood Drive N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I 2 1 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 2 1 I 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1160 10 25 115 0 55 145 965 75 1210 500 55 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration .0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A Thru A A 1 Thru P Right A A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A P Right A I Right A P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A 1 EB Right A SB Right A A I WB Right A A Green 8.0. 4.0 16.0 8.0 4.0 50.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 446 3433 0.42 0.13 40.7 D T 373 1863 0.03 0.20 32.2 C 38.0 D R 522 1583 0.06 0.33 22.9 C Westbound L 159 1770 0.11 0.09 42.1 D T 298 1863 0.00 0.16 35.3 D 27.6 C R 522 1583 0.12 0.33 23.5 C Northbound L 159 1770 0.33 0.09 43.9 D T 1770 3539 0.64 0.50 20.2 C 20.3 C R 997 1583 0.09 0.63 7.3 A Southbound L 446 3433 0.55 0.13 42.2 D T 1911 3539 0.30 0.54 12.7 B 20.2 C R 1124 1583 0.06 0.71 4.4 A Intersection Delay = 22.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000- Inalized Intersectibns'ReI - 4-1d''' Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas 'Date: 8/23 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year recent hor bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I i I No. Lanes I 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR I L T R Volume 1340 1200 240 1285 1460 355 1375 545 115 1325 645 525 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X X 1 Peds X X WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru P A I Thru A A Right P A 1 Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X NB Right 1 EB Right A SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 15.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 12.0 15.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0. 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group' Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 458 3433 0.84 0.13 64.1 E T 1504 3539 0.91 0.43 36.3 D 38.0 D R 884 1583 0.31 0.56 9.6 A Westbound L 486 3433 0.62 0.14 51.0 D T 1534 3539 1.01 0.43 55.2 E 47.1 D R 884 1583 0.43 0.56 10.6 B Northbound L 486 3433 0.84 0.14 62.6 E TR 804 3447 0.89 0.23 56.8 E 58.9 E Southbound L 458 3433 0.77 0.13 58.1 E T 796 3539 0.88 0.22 56.2 E 54.6 D R 620 1583 0.92 0.39 50.6 D Intersection Delay = 48.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D i0 HCS2000r:O=ghalized'Intersections Re L ,,4.1d Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 8 2/03 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: a pm Year recent short kgrd otal Project ID: 0363me06 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 0 1 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R. I L T R I L TR I L T R Volume 1260 1235 175 1195 910 390 1300 600 280 1405 405 295 Lane width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A P 1 Thru A A Right A P 1 Right A A Peds X X 1 Peds X X WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru P A 1 Thru A A Right P A 1 Right A A Peds X X 1 Peds X X NB Right 1 EB Right A SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 12.0 36.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 17.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2 0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound L 372 T 1416 R 831 Westbound L 315 T 1357 R 831 Northbound L 458 TR 983 Southbound Cycle Length: 120.0 _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 3433 0.74 0.11 59.3 E 3539 0.92 0.40 40.3 D 40.3 D 1583 0.22 0.52 11.3 B 3433 0.73 0.09 61.2 E 3539 0.79 0.38 33.1 C 31.9 C 1583 0.55 0.52 14.7 B 3433 0.70 0.13 54.3 D 3370 0.95 0.29 59.6 E 58.3 E L 515 3433 0.82 0.15 59.6 E T 1091 3539 0.39 0.31 32.1 C 38.8 D R 712 1583 0.43 0.45 19.3 B Intersection Delay = 41.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D secs APPENDIX 0 HCS20:0'0: "n ighalized Inter sect ions 'Re'^.a-e:4 ld'.' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY .Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2/2�/20�04 Analysis Time Period: am YC__m Intersection: Harmony/Mobile Home Park Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: Mobile Home Park Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 110 1435 1760 35 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 120 1576 1955 38 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 3 RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 10 75 0.85 0.85 11 88 0 0 0 1 1 L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L I I L R 120 11 88 320 133 647 0.38 0.08 0.14 1.69 0.27 0.47 22.8 34.5 11.4 C D B 14.0 B HCS2,000: *?ram<igna1ized .Intersections Re'' ^ e. 4. ld': TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 2 2/2004 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: armony/Mobile Home Park Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 East/West Street: Harmony Road North/South Street: Mobile Home Park Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 L T R I L T I 0.25 Volume 50 1535 1345 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 1598 1563 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 3 RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 2 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 40 120 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 141 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 52 47 141 C(m) (vph) 462 191 629 v/c 0.11 0.25 0.22 95% queue length 0.38 0.93 0.85 Control Delay 13.8 29.9 12.4 LOS B D B Approach Delay 16.8 Approach LOS C u HCS20OO::- �; gna-lized Intersections Relr 4t Id.` .. Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Timberwood Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas -Date: 8/22103 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year : recen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 E/W St: Timberwood Drive NIS St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I i No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 2 1 I 2 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R Volume 1180 5 35 165 10 230 140 605 15 170 825 140 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left A Thru A A 1 Thru P Right A A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A P Right A 1 Right A P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right A 1 EB Right A SB Right A A I WB Right A A Green 8.0 4.0 16.0 8.0 4.0 50.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 446 3433 0.48 T 373 1863 0.02 R 522 1583 0.08 Westbound L 159 1770 0.48 T 298 1863 0.04 R 522 1583 0.52 Northbound L 159 1770 0.29 T 1770 3539 0.39 R 997 1583 0.02 Southbound L 446 3433 0.18 T 1911 3539 0.50 R 1124 1583 0.15 Intersection Delay = 20.5 0.13 41.1 D 0.20 32.1 C 38.1 D 0.33 23.1 C 0.09 45.5 D 0.16 35.6 D 32.0 C 0.33 28.0 C 0.09 43.5 D 0.50 16.2 B 17.7 B 0.63 6.9 A 0.13 39.0 D 0.54 14.7 B 15.0 B 0.71 4.7 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C secs HCS2,000-: 'signalized Intersections ReIF,�=-� 4.ld Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Timberwood Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas ,Date: 8/22/03 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year e ent short bkgrd total Project D• 0363me06 E/W St: Timberwood Drive N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1155 10 20 115 0 55 140 845 75 1210 420 50 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left A Thru A A i Thru P Right A A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A P Right A 1 Right A P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right A 1 EB Right A SB Right A A I WB Right A A Green 8.0 4.0 16.0 8.0 4.0 50.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 446 3433 0.41 T 373 1863 0.03 R 522 1583 0.05 Westbound L 159 1770 0.11 T 298 1863 0.00 R 522 1583 0.12 Northbound L 159 1770 0.30 T 1770 3539 0.56 R 997 1583 0.09 Southbound L 446 3433 0.55 T 1911 3539 0.26 R 1124 1583 0.05 Intersection Delay = 21.8 0.13 40.6 D 0.20 32.2 C 38.2 D 0.33 22.8 C 0.09 42.1 D 0.16 35.3 D 27.6 C 0.33 23.5 C 0.09 43.6 D 0.50 18.7 B 18.8 B 0.63 7.3 A 0.13 42.2 D 0.54 12.3 B 21.0 C 0.71 4.4 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C H HCS2000': gnal zed Intersections Relp-=P 4.1d Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E Date: 8/22/03 Period: am pm Project ID: 0363me06 E/W St: Harmony Road Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent) short bkgrd total N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 0 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L TR Volume 1330 1175 190 1245 1280 305 1360 570 85 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 Southbound L T R I 1 2 2 1 L, T R 1275 625 450 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P I Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X WB Left A I SB Left A Thru P A I Thru A A Right P A I Right A A Peds X X I Peds X X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 14.0 26.0 13.0 14.0 12.0 11.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound L 515 T 1416 R 855 Westbound L 481 T 1380 R 792 Northbound L 515 TR 902 Southbound Cycle Length: 100.0 _Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) q/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 3433 0.73 0.15 45.7 D 3539 0.94 0.40 41.7 D 39.2 D 1583 0.25 0.54 12.4 B 3433 0.54 0.14 41.3 D 3539 0.99 0.39 51.3 D 44.1 D 1583 0.41 0.50 16.1 B 3433 0.76 0.15 47.3 D 3471 0.79 0.26 39.2 D 42.1 D L 412 3433 0.73 0.12 48.7 D T 814 3539 0.83 0.23 44.2 D 39.9 D R 665 1583 0.74 0.42 28.6 C Intersection Delay = 41.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D secs HCS2000:rgig'nalized Intersections Rele-P 4.1d Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Harmony Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas ,Date: 8/22/03 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: m- pm Year ecent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0363me06 E/W St: Harmony Road N/S St: Timberline Road .SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I 2 2 0 1 2 2 1 LGConfig 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L TR I L T R Volume 1240 1045 125 1170 895 400 1265 540 250 1345 395 385 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A P I Thru A A Right A P 1 Right A A Peds X X 1 Peds X X WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru P A I Thru A A Right P A 1 Right A A Peds X X 1 Peds X X NB Right 1 EB Right A SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 14.0 24.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 515 3433 0.49 0.15 39.7 D T 1345 3539 0.82 0.38 32.0 C 31.6 C R 823 1583 0.16 0.52 12.7 B Westbound L 446 3433 0.45 0.13 40.9 D T 1274 3539 0.83 0.36 33.8 C 31.1 C R 760 1583 0.62 0.48 20.8 C Northbound L 515 3433 0.55 0.15 40.6 D TR 944 3371 0.89 0.28 45.0 D 43.9 D Southbound L 446 3433 0.80 0.13 52.6 D T 920 3539 0.45 0.26 31.3 C 34.4 C R 712 1583 0.56 0.45 21.3 C Intersection Delay = 34.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C secs 0 APPENDIX A I I TABLE 2 Short Range (2006) Background Peak Hour Operation 7,46 Harmonyrrimberline (signal) EB D D WB C D NB E E SB D D OVERALL D D TimberlinefTimberwood (signal) EB D D WB C C NB C B SB C B OVERALL C C Harmony/RT Access (RT-in/RT-out) NB RT B B Harmony/Mobile Home Park (stop sign) SB LT D E SB RT B B SB APPROACH C C I EB LT B D TABLE 3 Short Range (2006) Total Peak Hour Operation 30 , 90? Harmony/Timberline (signal) EB D D WB C D NB E E SB D E OVERALL D D Timberlinerrimberwood (signal) EB D D WB C C NB C B SB C B OVERALL C C Harmony/RT Access (RT-in/RT-out) NB RT B B Harmony/Mobile Home Park (stop sign) NB RT B B SB LT E F SB RT B B SB APPROACH C C EB LT B D (D E H U') Lo to i-d i�5 o \— 390/355 m O N N IT v �— 910/1460 200/290 34 260/246' l (� 1255/1210 I I 175/240 M id � 0 0 o co c0 c0 N 1890/1615 70/50 0 v rn � 65/265 LO o 20/75 160/185 moo Timberwood 10/5 25/40 to LO o LO m o v o co rn SHORT RANGE (2006) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC LO C o o N_ O Harmony 50/110 O 1820/1545 —® 35/20 Se N m 8 Q -�— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles 15/35 —1365/1990 r 0 to N Cn m 0 0 c U) Figure 4 N C a) .0 F- LO LO Lf) 04 � Cq rn o o 390/355 ---a— 910/1460 195/285 260/340 4 1235/1200 175/240 M L 0 0 0 cco N O too N O o 55/230 Ln Ln cq -�— 0/10 15/65 1850/1590 - 70/50 0 u') 160/185 t r Timberwood 10/5 —® 25/40 Lo o � Un v rn SHORT RANGE (2006) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC to C _o N O 50/110 1815/1540 --a-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles di y. ��- ■ 15/35 -®— 1360/1985 Harmony Figure 3 TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation d Y✓ q ) y h I fY P S T i y '"7 ti NkC:.�' f t" i+• t u k .Y.. v.l .ayir.h{., l�.�L (,Wy �r� i J 4 4 F 1Nl,.i as 1�r -.h '._YA �..'b ,� r1 .E�.YA S�1`V�C� A� 4r� y�yp,LTT Kft.0 fA N'i^ t YR• 2Y A?.Iq..P..Y �.Y i:r Harmony/Timberline (signal) EB C D WB C DNB D D SB C D OVERALL C D Timberline/Timberwood (signal) EB D D WB C CNB B B SB C B OVERALL C C Harmony/Mobile Home Park (stop sign) SB LT D D SB RT B B SB APPROACH C B EB LT B C d C _E H rn v 400/305 " `f) P9 895/1280 �-- 170/245 240/330 ---0( ) r f1045/1175 -� 0 0 Ln 125/190 M � o CO 7 N N Cn Ln O� N0 O o N o 55/230 Lo v N ®— 0/10 15/65 ��l --- . 155/180 "'10, t r Timberwood 10/5 —o- 20/35 o o Ln CO Ln LO v v � 0 RECENT BALANCED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 0 0 0 v Harmony 50/110 1535/1435 —v --w— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles 15/35 �-- 1345/1760 Figure 2 ------------------------------------------- i PRIVATE DRIVE PCP BUILDING 22,500 S.F. � m ' I �l �IIIII1 � SCALE: 1'=60' SITE PLAN Figure 1 The future short range analysis year was determined to be 2006. Figure 3 shows the short range background peak hour traffic at the key intersections. The background traffic includes development of the Timberline Village retail center north of Harmony Road, but does not include development of the Harmony Lifestyle Center. The Harmony Lifestyle Center is not likely to be built and occupied by the year 2006. Table 2 shows the operation at the key intersections using the traffic shown in Figure 3. The key intersections are expected to operate acceptably. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. Figure 4 shows the short range total peak hour traffic at the key intersections. The site generated traffic was added to the background traffic to develop these traffic forecasts. Table 3 shows the operation at the key intersections using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 4. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The key intersections will operate similarly to that shown with just the background traffic. Discussions with City staff indicated that pedestrian connections to the adjacent neighborhoods were important for the PVHSHC. Appendix D contains a graphic showing the pedestrian destinations within 0.25 miles of the proposed PCMOB. There are three residential areas within 0.25 miles of this site. The existing buildings within the PVHSHC are also within 0.25 miles of the site. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet for the PCMOB is also provided in Appendix D. This site is in the Transit Corridor Area Type, even though there are no current transit routes on Harmony Road. It is also in the School Walking Area Type, even though there will be little pedestrian affinity between schools and the PCMOB. The minimum levels of service for both of these area types are B for all factors, except for visual interest and amenities, which is C. Some of the service factors cannot be achieved. It is recommended that a temporary asphalt path be constructed connecting to destinations 1 and 2. Destination 4 will be connected with completion of the loop drive. The desired pedestrian level of service cannot be reasonably achieved for the mobile home park. The City staff will need to grant an exception with regard to this pedestrian destination. By definition, there is only one bicycle destination with 0.25 miles of the PCMOB. This is the Traut Core Knowledge School. However, there will be little affinity between the PCMOB and the school. When the recommended temporary asphalt path is built between Timberwood Drive and the PCMOB, bicyclists will be able to utilize this facility. It should be wide enough to accommodate pedestrians and bikes. The Bicycle LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix D. There is no existing transit service within one mile of this site. When transit service is introduced to the Harmony Road Corridor, patrons will be able to use the transit stop built with the existing portion of the PVHSHC. �•Y A ` MEMORANDUM co O RE co p0 LO �a COCD o TO: Dean Barber, McWhinney Real Estate Services Ln Angie Milewski, BHA Design Utz c�o� o Jim Allen -Morley, Sear -Brown Group o cD City of Fort Collins ° 0 U FROM: Matt Delich ` L..".�.. • X z li DATE: February 3, 2004 a J W SUBJECT: Poudre Valley Health System Harmony Campus, Primary Care Medical Office Building transportation impact study m (File: 0363ME06) w o > N 0) O coo A primary care medical office building (PCMOB) has been w o proposed on the Poudre Valley Health System Harmony Campus (PVHSHC) af It will be located east of future Snow Mesa Drive, approximately 500 w feet south of Harmony Road. The site plan is shown in Figure 1. The z private loop drive is intended to be extended to Snow Mesa Drive. A portion of Snow Mesa Drive will be built south of Harmony Road. A N n scoping conversation was held with Eric Bracke, Fort Collins Traffic ti N Engineer. This proposal was presented to the Fort Collins engineering and planning staff. There will be on -going discussions regarding the access to Harmony Road. Given all of the previous information provided regarding the PVHSHC, a technical memorandum was agreed upon., The proposed PCMOB will be 22,500 square feet. Using Trip Generation, 7 h Edition, ITE, this building is expected to generate approximately 710 average daily trip ends, 56 morning peak hour trip ends, and 77 afternoon peak hour trip ends. Based upon current traffic counts and review of previous transportation studies for the PVHSHC, the trip distribution is expected to be 40% to/from the west, Uj 30% to/from the north, 15% to/from the east, and 15% to/from the south. CL cs z ¢ Figure 2 shows recent balanced counts at key intersection in Zthe area. Most of these traffic counts were obtained in late 2003. The balancing occurred due to traffic counts being obtained on ® z different days. Table 1 shows the current operation at the key U intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix A. The p key intersections operate acceptably. A description of level of ® a service and the Fort Collins intersection operation criteria are also cc provided in Appendix A. 0. a z Discussions with City staff indicated that if a signal were not warranted at the Harmony/Mobile Home Park/Snow Mesa intersection, the F- south leg would not be connected to Harmony Road, unless a design Uj Ca could be presented which assured limited access on the south leg. 3 Sear -Brown has designed an access that will restrict the south leg a (Snow Mesa Drive) to right-in/right-out traffic movements. cc Therefore, ,the traffic assignment of the site generated traffic was ~ performed with this constraint.