HomeMy WebLinkAboutSAGE CREEK - FDP - 25-98C - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)<j
on the plan.
i. Why have the plan set sheets been reduced in total number, the original proposal had
nine (9) sheets, this proposal eight (8)? The format of the plan sets dated February 18,
2000, are ideal and should be used since reducing the plan set sheet count makes it
more confusing.
j. Why the reduction in the number of lots?
k. The gross and net density figures. from the approved development plan and the plan
under review at this time breakdown are different. The gross and net density calculations
do compute on the plan sets dated March 14, 2000, and will need to be changed.
I. Where is the legend that was originally shown on sheet 3 of 9 on plans dated February
18, 2000? This needs to be shown on the plan sets.
m. Provide a detailed lighting plan for the multi -family dwellings (spec. sheet for all wall and
pole mounted fixtures).
n. Coordinate all easements, open areas, street, sidewalk and pedestrian crossings,
infrastructure through out the development with Natural Resources, Stormwater, Traffic
Operations, Engineering, Transportation Planning Services and other affected
departments and outside reviewing agencies. All infrastructure provisions need to be
met and are to be in compliance with the Land Use Code.
o. The plan sets shall be in substantial conformance with all Land Use Code standards and
criteria and as conditioned and approved by the Hearings Officer.
p. At least one more round of review for the Final Compliance plans is required before the
plans could be signed and filed.
Prior to formal re -submittal, it is pertinent that City staff meets with you and your team to discuss
issues relating to the plans. Additional comments will be forthcoming as they are reviewed and
received from City departments and from outside reviewing agencies.
Please return all drawings redlined by City staff with submission"of your revisions, that are clearly
dated and labeled as revised plans. Please see the attached Revisions Routing Sheet for the
number of copies of revisions to submit. To facilitate the complete re -submittal of the application
with supplemental materials, please have your project manager contact Ginger Dodge and/or
Voneen Macklin of the Current Planning Department at 970.221.6750.
Please contact me at 970.221.6750 and/or e-mail: rfuchs(a ci.fort-collins.co.us if you should have
any questions related to these comments and to schedule a meeting to discuss the Sage Creek
Final Compliance comments.
Sincerely,
Ronald G. Fuchs
Project Planner
cc: Engineering
Project File #25-98C
DAMy Documents\Planning Document\Sage Creek #25-98B LUC\Sage Creek Final Complianceltrl.doc
i
°r
Commu y Planning and Environmental Vices
Current Planning
City of Fort Collins
April 12, 2000
Mr. Eldon Ward, President
Cityscape Urban Design, Inc.
3555 Stanford Road, Suite 105
Fort Collins, CO 80525
RE: Sage Creek - Final Compliance — First Round
Dear Mr. Ward:
Staff has reviewed your documentation dated PDP 3-14-00 for the Sage Creek — Final
Compliance that were routed through the City on March 15, 2000 and would like to offer the
following comments:
1. Building Inspection: submitted a response that is attached to this document.
2. Gene Fisher: submitted a response that is attached to this document.
3. Natural Resources: submitted a response that is attached to this document.
4. Park Planning: submitted a response that is attached to this document.
5. Water Conservation: submitted a response that is attached to this document.
6. Poudre Fire Authority: submitted a response that is attached to this document.
7. Post Office: submitted a response that is attached to this document.
8. Streets: submitted a response that is attached to this document
9. Advance Planning: submitted a response that is attached to this document.
1b. Public Service: comment sheet is attached to this letter.
11. Zoning: comment sheets are attached.
12. Planning: provides the following:
a. Documentation needs to be submitted requesting any changes not approved and
reviewed by the Hearings Officer.
b. All certification blocks on the subdivision plat shall be consistent with the language
required by the City of Fort Collins. The signature block referencing Hearings Officer
needs to be changed.
c. Single-family dwelling elevations shall comply with Section 4.4(D)(2)(a)-(d) and need to
be provided to the Current Planning Department to insure compliance with the Hearings
Officer decision document.
d. The 15' utility and drainage easement on the west property line needs to be more clearly
shown on the plan sets.
e. Tract designations and plan notes need to be placed as to not conflict with other layers.
f. The typical street layout on sheet 7 of 8 needs to correlate with sheet 4 of 8.
g. The plan set needs to include reference to the Index of Drawings on the first plan sheet
page.
h. What is the area referenced as (M) on sheet 1 of 8, there is no documentation provided
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020