HomeMy WebLinkAboutSAGE CREEK - PDP - 25-98B - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS12-29-1999 2:30PM FROM CITYSCAPE 970 226 4196
ME
MEMORANDUM
(C*Q Pd
urban design, inc.
3555 Stanford road, suite 105
fort collins. oolorado B0525
(970) 220-4074
FAX (970) 228-4190
E-mail: cityscapehii.wm
TO: Bob Blanchard and Ron Fuchs, City Planning - FAX 416-2020
COPY TO: Jim Postle, James Company — FAX (303) 443-6777
Les Crawford, Sear -Brown - FAX 482-6368
FROM: Eldon Ward, Cityscape Urban Design, Inc. 6�iGc/
DATE: December 29, 1999
RE: Sage Creek PDP "Tier Three" Comments
PROJECT k: 7720 (7720memB)
A number of items in the December 2e Sage Creek Comments are difficult to understand.
Therefore, I would like to schedule an immediate meeting with Bob Blanchard, Ron Fuchs, Peter
Sams, and (possibly) Kim Kreimeyer to clarify these comments. I don't believe any.of these items
are major issues. However, at this point in the process, we need to have a Gear understanding of
Staffs comments, and bring an end to the introduction of further new comments_
Among the areas of confusion are:
•: References (probably in error) to the site's inclusion in the Harmony CenferPUD and the
Harmony Corridor Plan.
Comments that reference LUC sections without revealing how the PDP fails to meet
Code requirements.
Av Contradictory comments from different departments. (Zoning vs. Planning regarding
single family elevations, for example).
❖ Inclusion of new comments that have nothing to do with earlier revisions made to the
PDP.
❖ New comments that appear to contradict previous comments.
Requests for architectural detail beyond POP requirements (dimensioned doors and
windows, etc.).
❖ Inclusion of comments that were addressed with our November 301° revisions.
Because Jim Postle will be out of town starting Thursday, January &, it is important that we
meet Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday of next week. Please let me know as soon as possible
when we can discuss these items.
1T�L5UU
JAN 0 3 2000