HomeMy WebLinkAboutSAGE CREEK - PDP - 25-98B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - TRAFFIC STUDYHCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g TLTCPML.HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
210
356
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
1084
914
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
1084
914
Prob. of Queue -Free State:
0.89
0.99
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 2: LT from Major Street
SB
NB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
419
711
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
1021
712
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
1021
712
Prob. of Queue -Free State:
0.81
0.97
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 3: TH from Minor Street
WB
EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
1314
1286
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
186
193
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.79
0.79
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
146
152
Prob. of Queue -Free State:
0.99
0.99
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 4: LT from Minor Street
WB
EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
1236
1264
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
172
165
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor:
0.78
0.78
Adjusted Impedance Factor:
0.83
0.83
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.82
0.74
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
--------------------------------------------------------
141
122
Intersection
Performance Summary
Avg.
95%
Flow Move Shared
Total
Queue
Approach
Rate Cap Cap
Delay
Length
LOS
Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh)
(veh)
-----
(sec/veh)
---------
-------- ------ ------ ------
EB L 41 122 > 123
-------
43.7
-------
1.2
E
EB T 1 152 >
35.1
EB R 12 914
4.0
0.0
A
WB L 18 141 > 141
29.5
0.4
D
WB T 1 146 >
7.1
WB R 122 1084
3.7
0.4
A
NB L 18 712
5.2
0.0
B
0.2
SB L 197 1021
4.4
0.8
A
0.9
Intersection Delay = 2.3 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g TLTCPML.HCO Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) timberline (E-W) timber creek an elo
Major Street Direction.... NS
Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min)
Analyst ................... mjd
Date of Analysis.......... 8/1 9
Other Information.........am pm short long
Two-way Stop -controlled Inters ion
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes
Stop/Yield
Volumes
PHF
Grade
MCI (%)
SU/RV's (o)
CV's (�)
PCE's
------------
1 2 < 0
N
15 378 20
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10
1 2 < 0
N
170 600 75
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10
----------------
0 > 1 1
35 1 10
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10 1.10 1.10
----------------
Adjustment Factors
0 > 1 1
15 1 105
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10 1.10 1.10
---------------
Vehicle
Critical
Follow-up
Maneuver
Gap (tg)
Time (tf)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Left Turn Major Road
5.50
2.10
Right Turn Minor Road
5.50
2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road
6.50
3.30
Left Turn Minor Road
7.00
3.40
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g TLTCAML.HCO Page 2
--------------------------------
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 1: RT from Minor Street WE EB
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
274
227
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
1006
1062
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
1006
1062
Prob. of Queue -Free State:
0.82
0.98
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 2: LT from Major Street
SB
NB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
547
454
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
872
978
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
872
978
Prob. of Queue -Free State:
-
0.93
0.99
------- ------------------------------------------------
Step 3: TH from Minor Street
WE
EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
1062
1060
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
261
262
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.92
0.92
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
239
240
Prob. of Queue -Free State:
1.00
1.00
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 4: LT from Minor Street
WE
EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows: (vph)
1042
1044
Potential Capacity: (pcph)
228
228
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor:
0.91
0.91
Adjusted Impedance Factor:
0.93
0.93
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.92
0.77
Movement Capacity: (pcph)
--------------------------------------------------------
209
175
Intersection
Performance Summary
Avg.
95$
Flow Move Shared
Total
Queue
Approach
Rate Cap Cap
Delay
Length
LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh)
(veh)
--------------
-----
(sec/veh)
---------
-------- ------ ------ ------
EB L 69 175 > 176
33.3
1.6
R
EB T 1 240 >
27.4
EB R 18 1062
3.4
0.0
A
WE L 29 209 > 210
20.0
0.4
C
WE T 1 239 >
6.6
WE R 179 1006
4.4
0.7
A
NB L 12 978
3.7
0.0
A
0.1
SB L 64 872
4.5
0.1
A
0.5
Intersection Delay =
2.8 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g TLTCAML.HCO Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) timberline (E-W) timber creek/angelo
Major Street Direction.... NS
Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min)
Analyst ................... mjd
Date of Analysis........ 8 10/99
Other Information........ am pm short long
Two-way Stop -controlled Inti6rsection
-----------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound westbound
L T R L T R -L-- T R L T R
No. Lanes
Stop/Yield
Volumes
PHF
Grade
MCI (g)
SU/RV's (96)
CV,s (g)
PCEIs
------------
1 2 < 0
N
10 504 15
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10
---------------
1 2 < 0
N
55 411 20
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10
----------------
0 > 1 1
60 1 15
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10 1.10 1.10
----------------
Adjustment Factors
0 > 1 1
25 1 155
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10 1.10 1.10
---------------
Vehicle
Critical
Follow-up
Maneuver
Gap (tg)
Time (tf)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Left Turn Major Road
5.50
2.10
Right Turn Minor Road
5.50
2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road
6.50
3.30
Left Turn Minor Road
7.00
3.40
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Version 2.4g 08-10-1999
Center For
Microcomputers
In Transportation
Streets: (E-W)
harmony
(N-S) corbett
Analyst: Matt
File Name: HRCBPML.HC9
Area Type:
Other
8-10-99 am pm
Comment: short lon
------------------------------------
Eastbound
Westbound
----------------------------
Northbound
Southbound
L T
R
L T
R
L T R
---- ----
L T
---- ----
R
----
No. Lanes
---- ----
1 3
----
1
---- ----
1 3
----
1
----
1 1 < 0
1 1
1
Volumes
110 1595
225
185 1940
35
300 90 140
130 70
245
Lane W (ft)
12.0 12.0
12.0
12.0 12.0
12.0
12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0
12.0
RTOR Vols
0
0
0
0
Lost Time
1.00 3.00
3.00
1.00 3.00
3.00
1.00 3.00 3.00
1.00 3.00
3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1
2
3
4
5 6 7
8
EB Left
*
*
NB Left
Thru
*
Thru
Right
*
Right
Peds
*
Peds
WB Left
*
*
*
SB Left
Thru
*
*
Thru
Right
*
*
Right
Peds
*
Peds
NB Right
EB Right
SB Right
*
*
WB Right
Green
10.OA
4.OA
43.OP
Green 29.OA
Yellow/AR
4.0
0.0
5.0
Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Performance
Summary
Lane
Group: Adj Sat v/c
g/C Approach:
Mvmts
Cap
Flow
Ratio
Ratio Delay LOS Delay
----- ----- --- -----
LOS
-----
EB L
-----------
306
1770
-----
0.379
0.610 10.1 B 14.7
B
T
2515
5588
0.734
0.450 15.4 C
R
712
1583
0.333
0.450 11.6 B
WB L
375
1770
0.520
0.650 13.1 B 15.2
C
T
2738
5588
0.820
0.490 15.5 C
R
776
1583
0.048
0.490 8.6 B
NB L
463
1403
0.682
0.330 21.5 C 20.2
C
TR
525
1693
0.461
0.310 18.4 C
SB L
205
621
0.668
0.330 24.1 C 15.8
C
T
577
1863
0.128
0.310 16.0 C
R
728
1583
0.354
0.460 11.4 B
Intersection Delay =
15.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS
= C
Lost Time/Cycle, L =
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6.0
sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.737
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Version 2.4g
08-10-1999
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) harmony
(N-S) corbett
Analyst: Matt
File Name: HRCBAML.HC9
Area Type:
Other
8-10-9 am pm
Comment: short long
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L T
R
L T
R
L T R
----
L T R
---- ---- ----
No. Lanes
---- ----
1 3
----
1
---- ----
1 3
----
1
---- ----
1 1 < 0
1 1 1
Volumes
380 1480
240
120 1295
115
250 70 130
35 35 75
Lane W (ft)
12.0 12.0
12.0
12.0 12.0
12.0
12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols
0
0
0
0
Lost Time
1.00 3.00
3.00
1.00 3.00
3.00
1.00 3.00 3.00
1.00 3.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1
2
3
4
5
6 7 8
EB Left
*
*
*
NB Left
Thru
*
*
Thru
Right
*
*
Right
Peds
*
Peds
WB Left
*
*
SB Left
Thru
*
Thru
Right
*
Right
Peds
*
Peds
NB Right
EB Right
SB Right
*
*
WB Right
Green
17.OA
4.OA
43.OP
Green 22.OA
Yellow/AR
4.0
0.0
5.0
Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 100 secs
Phase combination order: #1 #2
#3
#5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection
Performance
Summary
Lane
Group: Adj Sat v/c
g/C
Approach:
Mvmts
Cap
Flow
Ratio
Ratio Delay
LOS
---
Delay LOS
----- ---
-----
EB L
-----------
499
1770
-----
0.802
----- -----
0.720 23.1
C
14.0 B
T
2738
5588
0.626
0.490 12.4
B
R
776
1583
0.326
0.490 10.1
B
WB L
430
1770
0.293
0.680 6.1
B
12.9 B
T
2515
5588
0.596
0.450 13.6
B
R
712
1583
0.170
0.450 10.6
B
NB L
407
1567
0.646
0.260 23.7
C
23.1 C
TR
404
1681
0.523
0.240 22.3
C
SB L
167
643
0.221
0.260 18.9
C
14.3 B
T
447
1863
0.083
0.240 19.0
C
R
728
1583
0.108
0.460 9.9
B
Intersection Delay =
14.5 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L =
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5.0
sec Critical v/c(x) =
0.697
APPENDIX B
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g TLTCPMS.HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows:
(vph)
165
260
Potential Capacity:
(pcph)
1142
1022
Movement Capacity:
(pcph)
1142
1022
Prob. of Queue -Free
State:
0.91
0.99
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 2: LT from Major Street
SB
NB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows:
(vph)
330
521
Potential Capacity:
(pcph)
1140
900
Movement Capacity:
(pcph)
1140
900
Prob. of Queue -Free
State:
0.85
0.99
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 3: TH from Minor Street
WB
EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows:
(vph)
1004
978
Potential Capacity:
(pcph)
282
292
Capacity Adjustment
Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.85
0.85
Movement Capacity:
(pcph)
239
247
Prob. of Queue -Free
State:
1.00
1.00
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 4: LT from Minor
Street
WB
EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows:
(vph)
942
966
Potential Capacity:
(pcph)
265
255
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor:
0.84
0.84
Adjusted Impedance
Factor:
0.88
0.88
Capacity Adjustment
Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.87
0.80
Movement Capacity:
--------------------------------------------------------
(pcph)
232
204
Intersection
Performance Summary
Avg.
95W
Flow
Move Shared
Total
Queue
Approach
Rate
Cap Cap
Delay
Length
LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph)
(pcph)(sec/veh)
(veh)
-------
-----
(sec/veh)
---------
-------- ------ ------
EB L 35
------
204 > 205
-------
21.3
0.6
D
EB T 1
247 >
18.8
EB R 6
1022
3.5
0.0
A
WB L 12
232 > 233
16.4
0.0
C
WB T 1
239 >
4.9
WB R 105
1142
3.5
0.2
A
NB L 6
900
4.0
0.0
A
0.1
SB L 168
1140
3.7
0.5
A
0.8
Intersection Delay
=
1.6 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g TLTCPMS.HCO Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
Streets: (N-S) timberline (E-W) timber creek/an elo
Major Street Direction.... NS
Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min)
Analyst ................... mjd
Date of Analysis.......... 8/10/99
Other Information ......... am pm short long
Two-way Stop -controlled Intersecti
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No. Lanes
Stop/Yield
Volumes
PHF
Grade
MCI (o)
SU/RV's (%)
CV1s R)
PCE's
------------
1 2 < 0
N
5 303 10
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10
1 2 < 0
N
145 435 60
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10
----------------
0 > 1 1
30 1 5
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10 1.10 1.10
---------------
Adjustment Factors
0 > 1 1
10 1 90
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10 1.10 1.10
---------------
Vehicle
Critical
Follow-up
Maneuver
Gap (tg)
Time (tf)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Left Turn Major Road
5.50
2.10
Right Turn Minor Road
5.50
.2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road
6.50
3.30
Left Turn Minor Road
7.00
3.40
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g TLTCAMS.HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows:
(vph)
224
184
Potential Capacity:
(pcph)
1066
1117
Movement Capacity:
(pcph)
1066
1117
Prob. of Queue -Free
State:
0.85
0.99
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 2: LT from Major
Street
SB
NB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows:
(vph)
447
367
Potential Capacity:
(pcph)
987
1089
Movement Capacity:
(pcph)
987
1089
Prob. of Queue -Free
State:
0.95
0.99
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 3: TH from Minor
Street
WB
EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows:
(vph)
860
858
Potential Capacity:
(pcph)
342
343
Capacity Adjustment
Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.94
0.94
Movement Capacity:
(pcph)
322
323
Prob. of Queue -Free
State:
1.00
1.00
--------------------------------------------------------
Step 4: LT from Minor
Street
WB
EB
--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows:
(vph)
846
847
Potential Capacity:
(pcph)
305
304
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor:
0.94
0.94
Adjusted Impedance
Factor:
0.95
0.95
Capacity Adjustment
Factor
due to Impeding Movements
0.95
0.81
Movement Capacity:
--------------------------------------------------------
(pcph)
289
247
Intersection
Performance Summary
Avg.
95%
Flow
Move Shared
Total
Queue
Approach
Rate
Cap Cap
Delay
Length
LOS
Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph)
(pcph)(sec/veh)
(veh)
(sec/veh)
-------- ------ ------
EB L 58
------
247 > 248
-------
19.0
-------
0.9
-----
C
---------
EB T 1
323 >
17.6
EB R 6
1117
3.2
0.0
A
WB L 12
289 > 291
12.9
0.0
C
WB T 1
322 >
4.6
WB R 156
1066
4.0
0.5
A
NB L 6
1089
3.3
0.0
A
0.0
SB L 52
987
3.9
0.0
A
0.4
Intersection Delay = 1.8 sec/veh
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1g TLTCAMS.HCO Page 1
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph: (904) 392-0378
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------
Streets: (N-S) timberline (E-W) timber creek/an elo
Major Street Direction.... NS
Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min)
Analyst ................... mjd
Date of Analysis.......... /10/99
Other Information.........am pm shor long
Two-way Stop -controlled I sect
-------------------------
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
No. Lanes 1 0 1 1
Stop/Yield
Volumes
PHF
Grade
MCI M
SU/RV's M
CVIs M
PCEIs
------------
1 2 < 0
N
5 414 10
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10
1 2 < 0
N
45 333 15
.95 .95 .95
0
1.,10
---------------
0 > 1
50 1 5
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10 1.10 1.10
---------------
Adjustment Factors
10 1 135
.95 .95 .95
0
1.10 1.10 1.10
--------------
Vehicle
Critical
Follow-up
Maneuver
Gap (tg)
Time (tf)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Left Turn Major Road
5.50
2.10
Right Turn Minor Road
5.50
2.60
Through Traffic Minor Road
6.50
3.30
Left Turn Minor Road
7.00
3.40
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4g 08-10-1999
Center For Microcomputers In Transportation
---------------- ------------------------------------------------
Streets: (E-W) harmony (N-S) corbett
Analyst: Matt File Name: HRCBPMS.HC9
Area Type ther 8-10-99 am
Comment. short long
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R I L T R( L T R L T R
No. Lanes
Volumes
Lane W ( f t )
RTOR Vols
Lost Time
0 2
1
1290
190
12.0
12.0
0
3.00
3.00
1 2 0
135 1755
12.0 12.0
0
1.00 3.00
1 0
1
265
110
12.0
12.0
0
1.00
3.00
0 0 0
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8
EB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
WB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
NB Right
SB Right
Green
7.OA
62.OP
Yellow/AR
4.0
5.0
Cycle Length:
--------------------------------------
100 secs Phase combinat:
NB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
SB Left
Thru
Right
Peds
EB Right
WB Right
Green 17.OA
Yellow/AR 5.0
Lon order: #1 #2 #5
---------------------------------
Intersection Performance
Summary
Lane
Group:
Adj Sat
v/c
g/C
Approach:
Mvmts
Cap
Flow
Ratio
Ratio
Delay
LOS
---
Delay LOS
-----
EB
-----
T
----
2384
-------
3725
-----
0.598
-----
0.640
-----
7.1
B
6.8 B
R
1013
1583
0.197
0.640
4.8
A
WB
L
275
1770
0.516
0.770
8.1
B
5.0 A
T
2794
3725
0.694
0.750
4.7
A
NB
L
372
1770
0.751
0.210
29.6
D
25.9 D
R
475
1583
0.244
0.300
17.1
C
Intersection
Delay =
7.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B
Lost
-----------------------
Time/Cycle, L
= 4.0
=-----------------------------------------------
sec Critical v/c(x)
= 0.706
HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
Version 2.4g
08-10-1999
Center For Microcomputers
In Transportation
Streets: (E-W) harmony
(N-S) corbett
Analyst: Matt
File Name: HRCBAMS.HC9
Area Type ter
8-10-99 a m
Comment: short long
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
L T R
L T
R
L T R
L T R
No. Lanes
---- ---- ----
0 2 1
---- ---- ----
1 2
0
---- ---- ----
1 0 1
---- ---- ----
0 0 0
Volumes
1350 210
100 985
230 100
Lane W (ft)
12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0
12.0 12.0
RTOR Vols
0
0
0
Lost Time
3.00 3.00
1.00 3.00
1.00 3.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2
3 4
5
6 7 8
EB Left
NB Left
Thru * *
Thru
Right * *
Right
Peds *
Peds
WB Left *
SB Left
Thru *
Thru
Right
Right
Peds *
Peds
NB Right *
EB Right
SB Right
WB Right
Green 7.OA 63.OP
Green 16.OA
Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0
Yellow/AR 5.0
Cycle Length: 100 secs Phase
combination order: #1 #2 #5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection
Performance Summary
Lane Group: Adj Sat
v/c
g/C
Approach:
Mvmts Cap Flow
Ratio
Ratio Delay LOS
Delay LOS
----- -----------
EB T 2831 3725
-----
0.527
----- ----- ---
0.760 3.3 A
----- ---
3.1 A
R 1203 1583
0.184
0.760 2.2 A
WB L 141 210
0.745
0.670 19.7 C
6.9 B
T 2422 3725
0.450
0.650 5.7 B
NB L 354 1770
0.684
0.200 27.6 D
24.6 C
R 459 1583
0.229
0.290 17.5 C
Intersection
Delay =
6.8 sec/veh Intersection
LOS = B
Lost Time/Cycle, L = 4.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.589
APPENDIX A
TABLE 1
Short Range Peak Hour Operation
0 IN.
C n i&A!F �'� 4� Y✓s� kFro 1�4 Y} i4{}y .
"- 4 r t . ..5 ^'Av:
{�.y� )
� C I,
Harmony/Corbett
(signal)
OVERALL
B
B
Timberline/Timber Creek/Angelo
(stop sign)
EB LT/T
C
D
EB RT
A
A
WB LT/T
C
C
WB RT
A
A
NB LT
A
A
SB LT
A
A
OVERALL
A
A
TABLE 2
Long Range Peak Hour Operation
4`
Harmony/Corbett
(signal)
OVERALL
B
C
TimberlinelTimber Creek/Angelo
(stop sign)
EB LT/T
E
E
EB RT
A
A
WB LT/T
C
D
WB RT
A
A
NB LT
A
B
SB LT
A
A
OVERALL
A
A
E
H
0
0
0 0
o
1551105
coo in
ro 'n
�— NOM
IN
J
25/15
60/35
NOM
15/10
om,E
o�
co
UoC>
vei
n 0) 0)
115135
--w--1295/19C
Harmony
120/185
'00J
J�—
380/110 ---/
'*] } r .
1480/1595
o
240i225
N �
Timber Creek
E
u
AM/PM
Rounded to
Nearest 5 Vehicles
N
LONG RANGE TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3
U
a
5QW —1
NOM —�
5/5 --),4.
1 5/90
�— NOM
10/10
I r
to o
If)
aC3
Harmony
Timber Creek
1350M 290 —
210/190
z:
0
A
985/1755
—1001135
r
to o
N �
O O
l4 O
N �
AM/PM
Rounded to
Nearest 5 Vehicles
N
SHORT RANGE TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2
N
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 1
cc
M
LO
O
M
0
0
0
0
U
0
z
a
J
W
0
J
W
Cr
0
z
w
2
z
W
J
0
CV
n
CV
CV
W
L_
r
pop
V
M
0
rn
cD
cp
6
rn
LL
T
Co
0
CV
M
CD
CD
O
rn
zz
0
D_
0
z
cc
w
z
z
W
z
0
a
cc
0
M
U)
H
03
0
LL
LL
a
H
TO: Jim Postle, The James Company
Darwin Horan, Writer Homes
Eldon Ward, Cityscape Urban Design
Terence Hoagland, Vignette Studios
City of Fort Collins
FROM: Matt Delich �vl�
DATE: August 10, 1999
SUBJECT: Harvest Park/Sage Creek Transportation Study - Response
to staff comments (File: 9909ME01)
This memorandum responds to staff comments pertaining to the
"Harvest Park and Sage Creek Transportation Impact Study," April
1999. It specifically addresses the short range and long range
operation of two intersections not included in the TIS. These are
the Harmony/Corbett intersection and the Timberline/Timber
Creek/Angelo intersection. The traffic forecasts at these
intersections include background traffic from PVH South Campus,
Harmony Village, Celestica/Harmony Technology Park, Symbios Logic,
and Preston Center.
Figure 1 shows the site generated traffic at the subject
intersections. Figure 2 shows the short range total peak hour
traffic forecasts at the subject intersections with the site
generated traffic from Harvest Park and Sage Creek. Table 1 shows
the peak hour operation at the subject intersections. In the short
range future, these intersections will operate acceptably.
Calculation forms are provided in Appendix A.
Figure-3 shows the long range total peak hour traffic forecasts
at the subject intersections with the site generated traffic from
Harvest Park and Sage Creek. Table 2 shows the peak hour operation
at the subject intersections. In the long range future, these
intersections will operate acceptably. The minor street left turns
from the Angelo leg will operate at level of service E. This type
of operation is normal at stop sign controlled intersections along
arterial streets. Overall, this leg and the intersection operates
acceptably. The Angelo leg will have no site generated traffic.
Calculations forms are provided in Appendix B.