Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARVEST PARK - MAJOR AMENDMENT & REPLAT - 25-98G - CORRESPONDENCE -Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: General 39 Landscape plan - page 4 of 6 - "Shrub beds (typ)" is called out, but what is a typical bed? No shrubs are listed on the plant list. Need to know what, where and how many of each item are going into the beds. 40 Site plan sheet 3 of 6. Block 2 Land Use Breakdown - also includes block 1 info. Either separate out the info for each block or remove the words "Block 2" Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, ple ase feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. rs T uly, \ I TRVY J ES City1 f la ner I Page 5 [9/18] This appears to be unaddressed. The revisions appear difficult to discern on whether they reflect construction of the utility and street stubs pertaining to the 4th filing with the revisions. Fading out the 4th Filing (with the exception of street and utility stubs to serve the 4th Filing) would clarify this. 28 A revision to the phasing plan for Harvest Park, and/or a phasing plan for this project should be submitted in order to understand how access is envisioned to this site and which road network of streets will be in place with the project. [9/18] Preliminary illustrations of this were received with direction given to the applicant. Final revised phasing plan sheets have not been received at this time. We will need to have this revised phasing plan signed off on prior to a hearing in order to establish how this will develop in conjunction with the overall Harvest Park development. 42 Provide FCLWD/SFCSD Signature Blocks on all pertinent sheets of the plan set for the 4th Filing and the revisions to original Harvest Park. 43 Please provide detail 16-4D (directional ramp detail) in the details sheet. Department: Stormwater Utility Topic: Erosion Control 49 Issue Contact: Basil Harridan Please add a note to the Erosion Control Plan on the 4th Filing clarifying that if the erosion control for this site is to be handled by the same BMP's approved for the original Harvest Park Submittal. Please include references to the sheet(s) of the original report and drawings that apply. Make sure that standard City erosion control notes are on the 4th filing plans. Please provide a new Erosion Control security estimate for the 4th Filing only so that it can be separated from the overall site escrow. Topic: General 47 Please remove the "Cotton Eyed Joe" reference from all documents on the utility plans. Topic: Grading 10 The trickle pan detail for the landscaped areas should have more depth than the 1 1 /2" shown. Provide also a detail for the concrete pans across the alleys. Topic: Notes 22 Please correct the notes to reflect the City of Fort Collins as being the "Local Entity" and requiring drainage certification prior to any Certificate of Occupancy. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Mark Jackson Topic: General 48 Previous comments have been addressed. Page 4 [9/18] The spot elevations on Harvest Park Lane and Rock Creek Drive should assumably be shown in an existing lineweight. 24 The flowline designs appear to be consistent on both sides of the street. However, based upon the elevation at the centerline for the two transition points, cross slope calculations from the crown to the eastern flowline appears to exceed 3% at both transition points. Cross slope should be between 2 and 3%. [As general notice to the design engineer: Future submittals to the City on new projects (not this project) will require centerline flowlines in addition to left and right flowlines on all public streets. Also, stationing is required to be centerline stationing, not flowline stationing.] [9/18] This issue appears to be unresolved; cross slopes at the transitions do not meet standards. Topic: Utility Plan 16 The access ramps across Cotton Eyed Joe Lane should be directional east -west only, not leading to the corners of the intersections. [9/18] Ensure that the correct detail is provided on the utility plan details sheet. 26 The Development Agreement for the overall Harvest Park may need to be amended with the project. This will be looked at in further detail as questions arising phasing of this with the overall Harvest Park development are resolved. 27 Revisions were submitted for Harvest Park, reflecting the changes proposed by this project. Overall, the revisions appear fine with the following comments: The area within this project on the Harvest Park revisions should appear faded in order to demonstrate that the approved design of this area for construction is with Harvest Park 4th, not this revision. It would appear to be more beneficial if the Harvest Park revisions showed utility stubs from the four public streets surrounding this site as well as the curb returns for the public street (at Rock Creek Drive and Harvest Park Lane) as not faded and to be designed and constructed with these revisions. Otherwise, the revisions would allow for construction of these roads without the necessary utility and street stubs; if these perimeter streets were constructed out of sequence without these in place, street cuts and street cut penalty fees would be levied. This would then require showing the street and utility stubs on the 4th filing as previously approved. Coordination and timing -wise, these revisions would be ideally signed off on at the same time as the 4th Filing mylars are signed off on. Perhaps this should all be a topic of further discussion. Page 3 41 Revise all documents (especially the plat) to show "Country Squire" as "Country Squire Way„ 44 Ensure the new street name is shown consistently on all documents. The site plan, plat, and some pages of the utility plans shows "Fruited Plains Lane". The response letter and some pages of the utility plan set shows "Fruited Plain Lane". (The utility plans also show "Cotton -Eyed Joe Street" in some sections.) 54 Xcel Energy has commented with concerns regarding utility placement and that additional utility easement width may be needed. The applicant should ensure coordination with all the utilities; a utility coordination meeting can be arranged through Engineering if desired. Topic: Plat 13 The plat seems to not be a full replat of the previous based upon a sliver of land that is created behind Harvest Park Lane right-of-way, most noticeable west of Cotton Eyed Joe Lane; why is this area being created? [9/18] This comment appears to remain unresolved and the response from the response letter is unclear. 45 A note should be added to the plat indicating that all tracts are to be owned and maintained by an HOA. 46 Please remove all indications of "private access" from easement dedications. In consulting with the City Attorney's office, having a private access easement dedicated to the City is an apparent contradiction. Perhaps the tract maintenance note from the previous comment should be modified to indicate that "all tracts are for private access and are to be owned and maintained by the HOA." The notation of "private access" on the original Harvest Park plat can remain for the time being. Topic: Street Design 18 Show the sidewalk along the public street and access ramps intersecting with Harvest Park Lane and Rock Creek Drive as proposed rather than existing in linetype/lineweight. [9/18] This comment appears to be unresolved. 19 Provide additional spot elevations at the intersection of the public street with Harvest Park Lane and Rock Creek Drive in accordance with 7-32A (to show that the public street ties into the existing streets.) Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins VIGNETTE STUDIOS Date: 09/25/2002 C/O TERENCE HOAGLUND 144 N. MASON ST., SUITE 2 FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal for HARVEST PARK MAJOR AMENDMENT AND REPLAT, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones Topic: General 50 Most of the comments are minor enough that we won't need another round of review before hearing, with the exception of the need for the Engineering Department to review a subdrain report. Please submit a subdrain report directly to Marc Virata (note issue #6 from Marc Virata of Engineering). As soon as Marc Virata gives me the go-ahead from the Engineering department, we can schedule the type 1 hearing. After the hearing, bring in the final mylars reflecting all the comments. Be sure to resolve the repeat comments (mostly Engineering and Stormwater issues). 51 FYI, a neighbor from the neighborhoods to the west of Harvest Park sent and e-mail to Councilman Eric Hamrick stating concern with the continuation of Rock Creek drive between Harvest Park and the existing street stub at the west property line. Please see the attached response letter that went out to the concerned neighbor, from City staff. There is nothing required of you regarding this, I just wanted to keep you informed of this neighborhood correspondence. 52 Please label County Squire as "Way" on the site plan, landscape plan and the plat. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General 6 An update to the subdrain report by Ayres and 'Associates should be submitted reflecting the changes to the development. [9/18] This comment appears to remain unresolved. The response letter indicates that this will be'provided with Final Compliance. This is not acceptable as this type of information is required before hearing. While it is doubtful that the subdrain report update states an issue with the change from single to multi family, this information is still nonetheless required prior to hearing. 29 Coordinate access ramps, street name, and other pertinent comments on the utility plan with the site and landscape plans. Page 1