The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHARVEST PARK - MAJOR AMENDMENT & REPLAT - 25-98G - CORRESPONDENCE - (3)If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750. You Trul , TRO JOf ES City PI nner Page 5 8 July 16, 2002 1. If the erosion control for this site is to be handled by the same BMP's approved for the original Harvest Park Submittal, this should in some manner be made clear on the erosion control plan, with references to the sheet(s) of the original report and drawings that apply. 2. Standard City erosion control notes must be on the plan. Topic: Grading 10 Please provide alley cross -sections as well as cross-section for the proposed swale and trickle pans. The trickle pan detail for the landscaped areas should be for a pan with raised lips on the sides. Provide also a detail for the concrete pans across the alleys. Topic: Notes 22 Please correct the notes to reflect the City of Fort Collins as being the "Local Entity and requiring drainage certification prior to any Certificate of Occupancy. Topic: Utility Plan 21 The utility plan legend shows the same symbol is being used by the sanitary line and the subdrain line, please differentiate these two, and call -out the subdrain line on the plan view. Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Mark Jackson Topic: General 11 Could internal e/w sidewalks be extended to allow for better pedestrian cross -access mid -block? It doesn't look to be a lot of extra length and would make for a better internal ped system. Please see redline comment. Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill Topic: General 7 No Comments Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols Topic: General 1 Please verify the name of the street down the center - is it Cotton Eyed Joe Ln or Amber Harvest Lane 2 Lot numbers on the plat don't coincide with numbers on site plan. Can't have 2 lots with the same lot number in the same filing and block 3 Each lot should have its own address Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. Page 4 25 District Signature Blocks are needed on pertinent sheets in addition to the cover sheet, (utility plan, detail sheets, utility plan & profile, etc.) 26 The Development Agreement for the overall Harvest Park may need to be amended with the project. This will be looked at in further detail as questions arising phasing of this with the overall Harvest Park development are resolved. 27 Revisions were submitted for Harvest Park, reflecting the changes proposed by this project. Overall, the revisions appear fine with the following comments: The area within this project on the Harvest Park revisions should appear faded in order to demonstrate that the approved design of this area for construction is with Harvest Park 4th, not this revision. It would appear to be more beneficial if the Harvest Park revisions showed utility stubs from the four public streets surrounding this site as well as the curb returns for the public street (at Rock Creek Drive and Harvest Park Lane) as not faded and to be designed and constructed with these revisions. Otherwise, the revisions would allow for construction of these roads without the necessary utility and street stubs; if these perimeter streets were constructed out of sequence without these in place, street cuts and street cut penalty fees would be levied. This would then require showing the street and utility stubs on the 4th filing as previously approved. Coordination and timing -wise, these revisions would be ideally signed off on at the same time as the 4th Filing mylars are signed off on. Perhaps this should all be a topic of further discussion. 28 A revision to the phasing plan for Harvest Park, and/or a phasing plan for this project should be submitted in order to understand how access is envisioned to this site and which road network of streets will be in place with the project. Department: Light & Power Topic: General 4 No comments Department: Natural Resources Topic: General 20 No Issues Issue Contact: Janet McTague Issue Contact: Doug Moore Department: Police Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Topic: Notes 23 Should attempt to provide at least 1 fc lighting in parking area. Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Ersosion and Sediment Control Page 3 29 Coordinate access ramps, street name, and other pertinent comments on the utility plan with the site and landscape plans. 32. Light and Power has required that no sidewalk or street trees should be installed on the streets surrounding this project in advance of this development, coordination should occur regarding the construction of these surrounding streets to ensure this does not take place. Topic: Plat 9 The plat contains outdated plat language as well as incorrect Engineering and Planning Approval Blocks. Please revise. 13 The plat seems to not be a full replat of the previous based upon a sliver of land that is created behind Harvest Park Lane right-of-way, most noticeable west of Cotton Eyed Joe Lane; why is this area being created? 14 Separate Blocks need to be indicated on the east and west side of Cotton Eyed Joe Lane if the intention is to use the same lot numbers. 15 Tract C should be Tract A, assuming different block numbers are used. Topic: Street Design 18 Show the sidewalk along the public street and access ramps intersecting with Harvest Park Lane and Rock Creek Drive as proposed rather than existing in linetype. 19 Provide additional spot elevations at the intersection of the public street with Harvest Park Lane and Rock Creek Drive in accordance with 7-32A (to show that the public street ties into the existing streets.) 24 The flowline designs appear to be consistent on both sides of the street. However, based upon the elevation at the centerline for the two transition points, cross slope calculations from the crown to the eastern flowline appears to exceed 3% at both transition points. Cross slope should be between 2 and 3%. [As general notice to the design engineer: Future submittals to the City on new projects (not this project) will require centerline flowlines in addition to left and right flowlines on all public streets. Also, stationing is required to be centerline stationing, not flowline stationing.] 30 The variance request submitted on June 14th, 2002 from Sear -Brown regarding street separation requirements was granted by the City Engineer and Traffic Engineer. No further written follow up indicating this will be made unless requested. Note that all future variance requests to City engineering design standards should be signed and stamped. Topic: Utility Plan 17 The southern most private drive leading out to Cotton Eyed Joe Lane exceeds the 500 square feet of sheet flow allowed to drain over a public sidewalk. Page 2 STAFF PROJECT REVIEW City of Fort Collins VIGNETTE STUDIOS' Date: 07/25/2002 C/O TERENCE HOAGLUND 144 N. MASON ST., SUITE 2 FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Staff has reviewed your submittal f& HARVEST PARK MAJOR AMENDMENT AND REPLAT, and we offer the following comments: ISSUES: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Troy Jones Topic: General 33 Coordinate the timing of street tree installation, sodding of the parkway, installation of irrigation lines in parkway until after trenching and installation of electric service lines are complete. 34 Please see the attached notes from the neighborhood meeting. 35 Replace the "Planning and Zoning Board" signature block from the plat and replace it with the "Director of Planning" signature block. 36 Add a Notary certification to the owner's certification on the site plan. 37 Please be sure to see the hand written comment sheets from Technical Services, Excel] Energy, and Fort Collins Loveland Water District & South FC Sanitation District. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Marc Virata Topic: General 5 Please be consistent on the name of the public street proposed. In dicsussion with PFA and Technical Services, Amber Harvest Lane should not be used because of the existing name to the south and it is not viewed as a continuation of the existing street. Also, while the origins of the phrase "Cotton Eyed Joe" is perhaps not entirely known and is open to interpretation, the phrase could perhaps be viewed as offensive to some. It is suggested that if this is the street name is being proposed, that it be changed. 6 An update to the subdrain report by Ayres and Associates should be submitted reflecting the changes to the development. 12 Revise the utility plan description area (not part of Fairway Estates.) 16 The access ramps across Cotton Eyed Joe Lane should be directional east -west only, not leading to the corners of the intersections. Page 1