Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSINCLAIR REDEVELOPMENT PUD - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 20-96 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYCenter For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) site drive (E-W) drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound ' Southbound L T R1 L T R1 L T R; L T R 1---- --------1---- --------1---- --------1---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 0 2< 0; 0 0 01 0 0 11 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N1 N1 ; Volumes 466 181 ; 191 PHF .95 .951 .951 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 01 01 SU/RV's (%)1 0 01 ; 0 CV's (%) 0 01 ' 01 PCE's ; 1.1 1.11 1.11 Adjustment Factors Vehicle - Critical Maneuver Gap (tg) ---------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.50 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection ---------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB --------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 242 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1044 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1044 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.98 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 XYYXXYXYXX%YYYXXXXYYXX%YYYYXYYXYXXX%XXYXYXXYYXXXYYXXXXXYYYXXYXXY File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) site drive (E-W) drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis .......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound ' Westbound 1 Northbound ' Southbound L T R1 L T R1 L T R1 L T R I---- ---- ----1---- ---- ----1---- --------1---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 0 2< 01 0 0 01 0 0 1; 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N1 N1 Volumes ; 640 241 401 PHF ; .95 .951 1 .951 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 01 ' 0 SU/RV's (%)1 0 01 01 CV's (%) 0 01 0i PCE's 1.1 1.11 1.11 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time(tf) ---------------------------------------------- --------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2 10--' Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3 .30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00_ 3.40 _ - _ ----------------- WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection ------ SB ---------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------- --------------------------------- -- -------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 332 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 940 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 940 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.95 Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App -------- ------ ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- NB R 22 1044 3.5 A Follow-up Time (tf) ------- ---- 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 SB Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB R 46 940 4.0 A Intersection Delay = 0.1 11. Intersection Delay = 0.1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 MMMMXXXXMMXMMMMMMMMXMMMXXXXMXMMMXMXXMMMXMMMMMMMMMMXXMXXXMXXMMXMX Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMxxxXxxMXXXXXXXXMMXMMM#MMMMMMMxMMMMxMMMMMMMMMMxMXMX File Name File Name ................ ................ Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) site drive Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) site drive Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Analyst................... mjd Date of Analysis .......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm I Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection I Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R IL T R; L T R; L T R; L T R ---- --------' ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 3 1; 0 0 ---- ---- ---- 0; 0 0 ----I---- --- - - 0' 0 0 --- 1 - I --- --------: ---- ---- No. Lanes ; 0 3 1; 0 0 ----1---- --------! 0; 0 0 0; ---- ---- ---- 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N; N; Stop/Yield N; N Volumes 716 36; 34 Volumes 949 41: ; 48 PHF .95 .95: -95 PHF .95 .95; .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 0 I 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0; 0 MC's (%) 0 0; 0 SU/RV's (%)1 0 0; p SU/RV's (%); 0 0; 0 CV's (%) 0 0; 0 CV's (%) 0 0; ; 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1: i 1.1 PCE's , 1.1 1.1: , 1.1 Adjustment Factors I Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time tf ( ) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 239 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 316 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1048 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 958 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1048 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 958 Prob: of Queue -free State: - ---------------------------------------- 0.96 Prob. of Queue -free State: --------------------------------- 0.94 - Intersection Performance Summary -'"-'"-" "" � � Intersection Performance Summary Y F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) -------- Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) -------- ------ ------ ------ Delay LOS ------------ ------ By .App ------ ----- ------ W8 R 40 1048 ----------- 3.6 ------ --------- A WB R 56 958 4.0 A --------- Intersection Delay = 0.2 J Intersection Delay = 0.3 El Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 YYYYZYZZZX####YZX#XXYYYYYX##XYYZZX####XYZYX###YYYYZY#Y#######Y#Y Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 ######X#X#####XX######X##X####XXX#####XX#XX#########XXXX######## File Name ................ File Name ..... Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) motel Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) motel Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Analyst................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing - short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound Eastbound ; Westbound ' Northbound Sou thbound Eastbound ; Westbound L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R L T R; L T Ri L T R; L T R ---- --------: ---- ---- ---- I ---- --- ----f ---- ---- ---- ---' ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ; 0 3 1; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 1 No. Lanes ; 0 3 11 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N; NI Stop/Yield ; N; N; - ; Volumes 730 1; 1 Volumes 963 11 ; ; 5 PHF .95 .951 i -95 PHF .95 .95: t .95 Grade ; 0 ; 0 0 I 0 Grade ; 0 0 0 i 0 MC's (%) 0 0; ; 0 MC's (%) 0 0; ; ; 0 SU/RV's (1)1 0 0; I 0 SU/RV's (%); 0 0; ; ; 0 CV's (%) ; 0 0; 1 0 CV's (%) 0 0; 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1; 1.1 PCE's 1.1 1.11 i 1.1 Adjustment Factors I Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road - 5.50 2.10 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 - - Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 - Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection - - WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection ________________________________________________________ ---- ---------- ------ -------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street --- WB EB Step 1: RT from -Minor -Street --------------- -------------_--__-_-_-_ WBEB - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 43 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 321 Potential Capacity: (pcph) _ 1043 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 952 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 952 Pro-. of Queue -free State: 00 1.00 Prob. of Queue -free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Intersection Performance Summary Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Dela F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App -------- ------ ------ ------ ------------ ------ --------- ------- ------ ----- -----' ------------ ------ --------- WB R 6 952 3.8 A WB R 1 1043 - 3.5 A Intersection Delay = 0.2 Intersection Delay = 0.1 1. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page Center For Microcomputersa In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) COLLEGE (E-W) THUNDERBIRDa Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... MD Date of Analysis.......... 6/14/96 Other Information......... SR ST LT AM P© Two-way Stop -controlled Interesodo ca= =a=Northbound=a Southbound ( Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 0 3< 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC'e (%) SU/RV's W CV,a M PCE's ------------ N 946 22 .95 .95 0 - Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Dnsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EE Conflicting Flows: (vph) 344 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 927 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 927 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 ------- ------------------------------------------------ Step 2: LT from Major Street SE NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (Vph) 1019 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 486 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 486 Prob. of Queue -Free State:--- -------- -------------------------- 0.91 ------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- --------- 4.1 WB R 50 927 4.1 0.0 A SB L 42 486 8.1 0.2 B 8.1 Intersection Delay = 0.4 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page c nac ac cc aavvaccc=c c avvcaa c aaccavcaaaaavvvvaaaaecvcavvaa a a =va c nac aca c =cc Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ccv a as== __= vaacaaacaccaa=avccaaac a cc c ca=c=acts a ana aaaa aaaa = aaaa as =aa ana Streets: (N-S) COLLEGE (E-W) THUNDERBIRD Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... MD Date of Analysis.......... 6/14/96 Other Information......... ER ST LT ® PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersectio ==anaccaca aecvacaacaavacaacaavcaaaa= - _= cv _= aaaaa= ala Northbound I Southbound laasastboundaa ` Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 3 < 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N Volumes 718 10 PHF .95 .95 Grade 0 MCIa ($) SU/RV's ($) CV'a ($) PCE's -------------------------- 26 .95 0 0 30 .95 1.10 1 1 1.10 -------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 =aaaaaaaavaaaaavv=avacanvaaaaaancaaaana====v accca==v=vaaa=aavavaccvvaac Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WE BE Conflicting Flows: (vph) 258 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1025 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1025 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------- ----------------------------------------------- Step 2: IT from Major Street SB NB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 767 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 664 Movement Capacity: (peph) 664 Prob. of Queue -Free State:-------------0_95 __________________________ __________--- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95� Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) _________ ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _____ 3.6 WE R 35 1025 3.6 0.0 A SB L 30 664 5.7 0.0 B 5.7 Intersection Delay a 0.3 sec/veh HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 06-18-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) drake (N-S) college Analyst: Matt File Name: 2 E/W Area Type: Other 6-18-91 ar pm Comment: existing short long `� Eastbound ' Westbound ' Northbound , Southbound ' L T R L T R; L T R; L T R No. Lanes 2 2 1 ; 2 2 1 2 3 1 ; 2 3 1 Volumes 350 596 188: 130 487 264: 188 1570 65: 134 925 191 PHF or PK1510.95 0.95 0.95:0.95 0.95 0.95:0.95 0.95 0.95;0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Width :12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 12.0 Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 % Heavy Veh; 1 1 1; 1 1 1; 1 1 1; 1 1 1 Parking ;(Y/N) N I(Y/N) N I(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N Bus Stops 0; 0; 0; 0 Con. Peds 0; 0; 0; 0 Ped Button ;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s:(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 23.5 si(Y/N) Y 23.5 Arr Type ; 3 3 3; 3 3 3; 3 5 3; 3 5 3 RTOR Vols 1 0; 0; 0; 0 Lost Time :3.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; Prop. Prot.; i ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * ;NB Left Thru * ; Thru Right * Right Peds ; Peds WB Left * ;SB Left Thru * ; Thru Right * Right Peds ; Peds NB Right * ;EB Right SB Right * ;WB Right Green 17.OA 30.OA - 16reen 19.OA 36.OP. Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 ;Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 536 3574 0.707 0.150 39.8 D 31.1 D T 1003 3762 0.656 0.267 30.8 D - R 733 1599 0.270 0.458 15.3 C WB L 536 3574 0,263 0.150 34.4 0 26.2 D T 1003 3762 0.537 0.267 29.1 D R 733 1599 0.379 0.458 16.4 C NS L 596 3574 0.342 0.167 33.7 D 35.9 0 T 1787 5644 1.017 0.317 37.1 D R 786 1599 0.086 0.492 12.3 B SB L 596 3574 0.243 0.167 33.0 D 19.2 C T 1787 5644 0.599 0.317 18.4 C R 786 1599 0.256 0.492 13.5 B Intersection Delay = 29.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.733 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 06-18-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) drake (N-S) college Analyst: Matt File Name: Z �/� G �- Area Type: Other 6-16-96 am pm Comment: existing short long Eastbound ; Westbound Northbound ; Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- --- ---- ---- ----I---- ---- ----1---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 Volumes 307 648 3641 206 690 1741 388 1912 120: 322 2386 445 PHF or PK15I0.95 0.95 0.95;0.95 0.95 0.95;0.95 0.95 0.95;0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Width :12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0 12.0 Grade - 0 0 ; 0 ; 0 % Heavy Vehi 1 1 1 1; 1 T 11 1 1 1 Parking ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N Bus Stops 0; 0; 0; 0 Con. Peds ; 0; 0; 01 0 Ped Button ;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 23.5 s:(Y/N) Y 23.5 Arr Type 3 3 3; 3 3 3; 3 5 3; 3 5 3 RTOR Vols 0; 0; 0; 0 Lost Time :3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00;3.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; Prop. Prot.; I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 EB Left * ;NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds ; Peds WB Left * ;SB Left Thru * ; Thru Right * ; Right Peds Peds NB Right * :EB Right SB Right * - ;WB Right Green 12.OA 23.OA ;Green 13.OA 54.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 ;Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ------------------------------------------------ --------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ---- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 387 3574 0.660 0.108 52.1 E 42.6 E T 784 3762 0.914 0.208 46.2 E R 560 1599 0.684 0.350 27.7 D WB L 387 3574 0.579 0.108 40.3 E 46.9 E T 784 3762 0.972 0.208 54.8 E R 560 1599 0.327 0.350 21.9 C NB L 417 3574 1.007 0.117 76.1 F 19.8 C T 2634 5644 0.841 0.467 9.8 8 R 959 1599 0,131 0.600 7.9 B SB L 417 3574 0.837 0.117 49.0 E 32.2 D T 2634 5644 1.049 0.467 33.7 D R 959 1599 0.488 0.600 10.6 B Intersection Delay = 32.0 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D- Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c.(x) = 1.003 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 06-18-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) drake (N-S) college Analyst: Matt File Name: Area Type: Other 6-18-9 am pm Comment: existing short long Eastbound Westbound Northbound ; Southbound L T R; L T R L T R; L T R ---- ----I---- ---- ----I---- --------1---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 ; 2 3 1 Volumes 350 596 1881 130 487 264: 188 1570 65: 134 925 191 PHF or PK1510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 0.95:0.95 0.95 0.95:0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Width :12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade ; 0 i 0 0 ; 0 % Heavy Veh; 1 1 1; 1 1 1; 1 1 1; 1 1 1 Parking ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N Bus Stops 0; 0; 0; 0 Con. Peds ; 0; 0; 0; 0 Ped Button ;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 20.5 s1(Y/N) Y 20.5 Arr Type 3 3 3; 3 3 3I 3 5 3i 3 5 3 RTOR Vols 0! 01 0; 0 Lost Time :3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; ; Prop. Prot.' ______________-______________----___________� ____________ ______________ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * ;NB Left Thru * Thru Right * ; Right Peds Peds WB Left * * ;SB Left Thru * ; Thru Right * Right Peds ; Peds NB Right * ;EB Right SB Right * ;WB Right Green 17.OA 30.OA ;Green 19.OA 36.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 ;Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 120 sacs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c 9/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 363 1787 1.014 0.325 61.9 F 37.7 0 T 1003 3762 0.656 0.267 30.8 0 R 733 1599 0.270 0.458 15.3 C WB L 331 1787 0.414 0.325 17.6 C 23.7 C T 1003 3762 0.537 0.267 29.1 D R 733 1599 0.379 0.458 16.4 C NB L 596 3574 0.342 0.167 33.7 D 35.9 D T 1787 5644 1.017 0.317 37.1 D R 786 1599 0.086 0.492 12.3 8 SB L 596 3574 0.243 0. 167 33.0 0 19.2 C T 1787 5644 0.599 0.317 18.4 C - R 786 1599 0.256 0.492 13.5 B Intersection Delay = 30.1 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.906 _______________________________________________________________________ HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 06-18-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) drake (N-S) college Analyst: Matt File Name: Area Type: Other 6-18-96 am pm Comment: existing short lon Eastbound Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R --------'---- ---- --- --- --------1---- ---- No. Lanes ; 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 ; 2 3 1 Volumes 307 648 364: 206 690 174: 388 1912 120: 322 2386 445 PHF or PK1510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 0.95:0.95 0.95 0.95;0.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Width ;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade I 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 % Heavy Veh; 1 1 1; 1 1 1; 1 1 1; 1 1 1 Parking i(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N :(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N Bus Stops i 0; 0; 0; 0 Con. Peds 1 01 0; 0; 0 Ped Button ;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 20.5 s;(Y/N) Y 20.5 Arr Type 1 3 3 3; 3 3 3: 3 5 3; 3 5 3 RTOR Vols 0; 0; 0; 0 Lost Time :3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00;3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; i Prop. Prot.; ____-_________________________________________________________________ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * ;NB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds ; Peds WB Left * * ;SB Left Thru * Thru Right * ; Right Peds ; Peds NB Right * ;E8 Right SB Right * ;WB Right Green 16.OA 23.OA ;Green 16.OA 47.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 ;Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap ---- Flow ------- Ratio ----- Ratio Delay ----- ----- LOS Delay --- ----- LOS --- ----- EB L 316 1787 1.022 0.308 71.6 F 46.2 E T 784 3762 0.914 0.208 46.2 E R 600 1599 0.639 0.375 25.0 C WB L 316 1787 - 0.687 0.308 26.5 D 44.1 E T 784 3762 0.972 0.206 54.8 E R 600 1599 0.305 0.375 20.2 C NB L 506 3574 0.830 0.142 45.6 E 22.7 C T 2305 5644 0.961 0.408 19.1 C R 919 1599 0.137 0.575 8.9 B SB L 506 3574 0.689 0.142 40.0 D T 2305 5644 1.199 0.408 R 919 1599 0.509 0.575 12.0 B Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = (g/C)*(V/c) _______________________________________________________________________ is greater then one. Calculation of D1 is infeasable. APPENDIX C Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXMXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYXXX File Name .......... :..... - - - Streets: (N-S) site drive (E-W) drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information-........ existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound , Southbound , L T R; L T R; L T RI L T R ---- ---- ---- I ----- --- ---- I ---- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 2< 01 0 0 0; 0 0 1; 0 0 0 Stop/Yield ; N; N; ; Volumes 399 18: 19: - PHF - -9 "-91 - I .91 .. Grade - 0; - .0 ; 0 ; .0 MC's (%) 0 01 01 SU/RV's (%)! 0 0; CV's (%) i 0 01 i 0: PCE's , 1.1 1.1; - 1.1 ------------------------------ __________________________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) ------------------- Time (tf) ---------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 - Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 -- 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road - 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road - 7.00 3.40 " WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection " -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB I SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 208 - Potential Capacity: (pcph) _ - 1086 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1086 - Prob: of Queue -free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.98 - Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total - Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) ________ ______ ______ .____-_ Delay . ------------ LOS By App NB R 23 1086 3-4 ------ ---_-_- A - Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 Y YYYYXYYYYYXYXYXXYYXXYYYXXXYtXYYXYXXXXXXXYYXXXYXXXYXXXXYXYXXXXYY File Name Streets: (N-S) site drive (E-W) drake Major Street Direction..-. EW - Length of Time Analyzed.._ 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis---------" 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound ' Northbound ' Southbound L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R ---- --------f---- --------1---- ---- ----1 --- --- ---- No. Lanes 1 0 2< 01 0 0 0; 0 0 1; 0 0 0 NI Stop/Yield � N Volumes , 547 241 ; 401- PHF.9 .9i Grade 0 i 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 01 01 SU/RV's (%); 0 0; 01 CV's PCE's ------------------------------------------- _____________________________ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ . Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor -Road - 5..50 2:60 Through Traffic Minor Road - 6.50 - 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00. 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------=----- ----------- Step 1:-RT from Minor Street NB SB ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 286 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 992 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 992 Prob. of Queue -free State: ___-0_95 ---- ------------- Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App ________ ______ ______ ______ ------------ ------ --------- NB R 48 992 3.8 A Intersections Delay = - 0.2 Intersection Delay = 0.1 - - - " Center For Microcomputers In Transportation I - Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 YYXXXYYYYXYYYYYYYYYXXXXYXXYYYYYYYYXYXYYYXYXXXYYXYYXYYYXYXXXYYYXX XYXYYXXXYYYYYYYXXYXYYYYYYXYYYYYYYXYYYYYXYYYYYYYYYYYYYYXXXYYXYYYY File Name ................ File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) college (E-W).site drive Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) site drive Major Street Direction.... NS Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Analyst................... mJd Date of Analysis.......... Other Information......... 6/18/96 existing short long am pm Date of Analysis.......... Other Information......... 6/18/96 existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection --- Two-way Stop -controlled --------------- Intersection Northbound ---- Southbound ! ------------ Eastbound ! Westbound ------------------------------------------- ! Northbound ! Southbound , Eastbound ! Westbound L T R; L T R! L T R; L T R L T R! L T R! L T R; L T R No. Lanes 0 3 L! 0 0 01 0 0 0; 0 0. 1 No. Lanes ! 0 3 1! 0 0 0! 0 0 01 0 0 1 Stop/Yield ! N! N! Stop/Yield ! N! N! Volumes ! 608 361 ! 34 Volumes 807 '41! ! ! .48, PHF ! .9 .9: _9 PHF ! .9 I .9! .9 Grade 0 ! 0 ! 0 0 Grade 0 ! 0 0' 0 MC's (%) ! 0 01 ! 0 MC's (%) ! 0 01 ' 0 -SU/RV's (%),! 0 0! 0 SU/RV's (%)! 0 0! ; � 0 CV's (%) ! 0 01 0 CV's (%) 0 0! 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1! 1.1 PCE's , 1.1 1.1, 1.1 -- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ----------------------------------------------------------------- Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road _ 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------------------- - Step 1:. RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB - Conflicting Flows: (vph) 203 Potential Capacity: (pcph) - 1093 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1093 Prob. of Queue -free State: - ----------------------------------------------------- -0.96 - Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) -------- ------ ------ ------ Delay ------------ LOS By App WB R .. 42 1093 3.4 ------ ------- A Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road _ 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC ---------------------- Intersection ---------------------- Step 1: RT'from Minor Street --------------------- ----------------------------------- - WB EB Conflicting Flows:-(vph) 269 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1012 - . Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1012 Prob: of Queue -free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.94 Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App -------- ------ ----- ----- ----------- ------ --------- WB R 58 1012 3.8 A - - Intersection Delay= 0.2 - - i 'Intersection Delay = 0..3 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsio_nalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 . File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) motel Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------- Northbound Southbound Southbound ; Eastbound ; Westbound L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R ---- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ; 0 3 1; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N; N Volumes 622 1; I i PHF .9 .9; I .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0: i i 0 SU/RV's (%); 0 0; 1 0 CV's (%) 0 0; 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1: i i 1.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (t9) Time (tf). ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection . --------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB ------------------------------------------------------ Conflicting Flows: (vph) -207 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1088 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1088 Prob. of Queue -free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App -------- ------ ------ ------ ------------ ------ --------- WB R 1 1088 3.3 A Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) motel Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ' Northbound Southbound f Eastbound I Westbound L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R ---- ----I---- ---- ---- I --- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 3 1; 0 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N; N; Volumes 821 1; 5 PHF ' .9 .9; ; .9 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0; i 0 SU/RV's (%); 0 0; 0 CV's (%) 0 0; 0 PCE's i 1.1 1.1: 1.1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street ------------------------------------------------------ WB . EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 274 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1006 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1006 Prob. of Queue -free State: ------------------------------------------------------ 0.99 Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App -------- ------ ------ ------------------ ------ ------- WB R 7 1006 3.6 A Intersection Delay = 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.2 Center For " Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsianalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 XX#####X#XXXX##XXXXXX#XXX###XXXXX##XXX######X###X#XXM#X#####X#X# File Name ................. .. Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) thunderbird Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) . Analyst................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound I Southbound ; Eastbound ; Westbound L T R; L T R; L T R; - L T R ---- --- ---- ---- ----'I ---- ---- ---- I ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 3< 0; 1 0 0; 0 0 0; 0 0 1 Stop/Yield ; N; N; _ Volumes 804 "181 33 _ 43 PHF .9 .9; .9 - .9 Grade .; 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) 0. 01 0" i 0 SU/RV's (%) 0 0': 0 - 0 CV's (%) 0 0' 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.11 1.1 i 1.1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Maneuver _ Gap (tg) ---------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road '5.50 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 Follow-up Time (tf) 2.60 .3.30 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsianalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 xxxx#XXX#X#x#Xxxx#xXXx#xXxxXXxXXxXX#xXxxxX##XXx#x#XxXxx#x#xXXXXX WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 277 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1002 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1002 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.95 ------------------------------------------------------ Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB ------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 822 Potential Capacity:.(pcph) 621 Movement Capacity: (Pcph) 621 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.93 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 XZYXZZZXXXZZXXXXXZXXXXXZZXXZXXXXXZXXXXXXXZZXZXZZZZZXXXXZXXXXZXZZ Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap .SharedCap Avg.Total - Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App -------- ------ ------ ------------------ ------------- WB R .53 1002. 3.8 A SB L 41 621 6.2 B 0.4 Intersection Delay = 0.3 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 YYYY#YYYYYZZZZYZ#ZZYYYYYYYY##YYYYYYYY#YZZZZZ#ZZZZZZZYYYYYZYYYYZY File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) college (E-W) thunderbird_ - Major Street -Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd . Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound Southbound ; Eastbound Westbound L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R --- ---- --- --- --- '---- ---- ---- '---- ---- --- No. Lanes 0 3< 0; 1 0 0; 0 0 0; •0 0 1, Stop/Yield N; N; .; Volumes ; 610 8; 21 30 PHF Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's (%) ; 0 0; 0 0 CV's (%) 0 0; 0 ! 0 PCE's - 1.1- 1.11 1.1 1.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver - Gap (tg) "Time (tf) Left Turn Major. Road _ 5.50 2.10 - Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 --2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road - 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 x xYXxz##x#xxzzzxxzxzxz#zXxYYxxzzzxYzzxYXXZYxzxxxzxY#YzxzxYYYYxxY . WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection ----------- --------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor- Street WB EB Conflicting.Flows: (vph) 207 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1088 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1088 Prob. of Queue -free -------------------------------------------------------- State: 0.97 Step 2:-LT from Major Street ---------------------------------------------- . SB NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) ------ 618 Potential Capacity: (pcph) - 799 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 799 Prob. of Queue -free -------------- --------------------------------------- State: 0.97 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 X XXXXXXXXXXXXYXXXYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYXYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay - LOS By App -------- ------ ------ ------ ------------ ------ ------- WB R 36 1088 3.4 A SB L 25 799 4.7 A 0.2 Intersection Delay = 0.2 HCM: SiGNALIZFCenterEForCMicrocomputers Inraranspotation 06-18-1996 Streets:-(E-W) drake (N-S) college - - Analyst: Matt File Name: Area Type: Other 6-18-96 am pm Comment: existing short - long Eastbound ' Westbound ' Northbound Southbound ; L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R 1---- --------;---- ---- ----I---- ---- ---;---- ---- ---- No. Lanes ; 1 2 1; 1 2 1 2 3 1; 2 3. 1 Volumes 294 512 157; 109 412 222; 160 1337 561 115 771 159 PHF or PK15;0.90 0.90 0.9010.90 0-.90 0.90;0.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.90 Lane Width ;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0112.0 12.0.12.0112.0 12.0 12.0 Grade ; - 0 ; 0 0 0 % Heavy Veh; 1 1 1; 1 1 i; 1 1 1; 1 1 1 Parking ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N --;(Y/N) N Bus Stops 0;0; 01 0 Con. Peds ; 0; 0; 0; 0 Ped Button ;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 20-.5 s;(Y/N) Y 20.5 Arr Type 3 - "3 3; 3- 331 3 5 3; 3 5 3 RTOR Vols ; - 0; "0; 0; 0 Lost Time ;3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00. 3.00 3.00:3.00 '3.00 3.0013.00. 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; Prop. Prot.; ; Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * ;NB Left Thru * ; Thru Right * - ; Right Peds - - Peds WB Left * * ";SB "Left Thru* ; Thru Right * Right Peds ; Peds - NB Right * ;EB Right SB Right - * -- ;WB Right Green 15.OA.28.OA ;Green 17.OA 32.OP. Yellow/AR - -4.0 5.0 .;Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 110 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio" Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- ES L - 382 1787 "0.856 0.318 28.7 D 25.3 .�D T 1026 3762 0.582 0.273 26.9 D R - - 741 1599 0.235 0.464 13.5 8 WB L 342 1787 0.354 0.318 15.2 C 20.8 C T 1026 3762 0.469 0.273 25.6 D - "R 741 1599 0.333 0.464 14.3 B NB .LL .585 3574 0.313 - 0.164 30.9 D 24.2 C T 1745 5644 0.937 0.309 24.0 C R 770 1599. 0.080 0.462 11.7 B SS L. -585 3574" 0.226 0.164 ' -.30.4 D 17.8 C T 1745 5644 0.541 0.309 16.9 C . R 770 1599 0.230 0.482 12.6 B Intersection Delay = 22.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle. L = 9.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.709 --------------------------------------- HCM: SIGNALIZFED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Ier is ion 2.4t 06-18-1996 en er ror Microcomputers n ranspor ation Streets: (E-W) drake (N-S) college Analyst: Matt File Name: Area Type: Other 6-18-96 am pm Comment: existing short long Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R 1---- --------;---- --------;---- ---- ----;---- --- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 ; 2 3 .1 ;- 2 3 1 Volumes ; 256 558 303; 175 583 146; 329 1633 103; 274 1908 371 PHF or PK15;0.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.9010.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.90 Lane Width ;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.011.2.0 12.0 12.0 Grade .I 0 ; 0 0 0 % Heavy Veh; 1 1 1; 1. 1 1;- -"1 1 1; 1 . 1 1 Parking ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N . Bus Stops ; 0; - 0; "0; 0 Con. Peds 1 0; 0; 0; 0 Ped Button..;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 29.5 s;(Y/N) Y 20.5 s;(Y/N) Y 20.5 Arr Type 1 3 3 3; 3 3 3; 3 'S 31- 3 5 3 RTOR Vols ; 0; 0; 0; 0 Lost Time ;3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00-3.00;3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; Prop. Prot.; ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 +'7.;, 8. EB Left * * ;NB Left * " Thru * Thru Right * Right* - Peds ; Peds WB Left * * ;SB Left Thru * - ; Thru Right * ; Right 'Peds - ; Peds NB Right *- ;EB Right * -_ SB. Right * ;WB Right Green 16.OA 23.0A ;Green 16.OA 47.OP Yellow/AR 4.0 .5.0 ;Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6. -------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay .LOS ----- ---- ------- ---- ----- ----- -- ----- --- EB L 316 1787 0.899 0.308 42.9 -E 36.2 0 T 784 3762 0.831 0.208 39.8 D R "600. 1599 0.562 _ 0.375 23.5 C WB L 316 1787 0.614 0.308 24.2 C 35.3 D. T 784 3762 0.868 0.208 42.1 E R 600 1599 0.270 0.375 19.9 C NB L 506 3574 .0.745 0.142 41.6. E - --18.5 C T - 2305 "5644 0.866 0.408 14.7E R 919 .1599 0.124 0.575 8.9 B - SB L 506 3574 0.618 0.142 38.5 D 36.6 0 T 2305 5644 - 1.054 0.408 40.7 E R 919 1599 0:448 0.575 11.3 B Intersection Delay = 30.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = D Lost Time/Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.954 APPENDIX B Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 - Page 1 X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) office drive Major Street Direction .... .EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 6/1 Other Information......... existing short long Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound I Westbound L T R; L T R __-- -___ ---- i---- __-- ---- No. Lanes 0 2< 0; 1 2 0 Stop/Yield N; N Volumes 542 6; 5 .532. PHF .9 .9; .9 .9 Grade 0 0 MC's (%) 0 0; 0 - 0 SU/RV's '(%)'i 0 0: 0 0 CV's (%) - 0 0; 0 0 PCE's ; 1.1 1.1; 1.1- .1.1 (E-W) drake am pm Northbound ; Southbound L T R; L T R ___ _-__ ____i____ ___- ---- 1 0 1; 0 .0 0 I 12 22: .9 .9I 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 1.1 1.1 Adjustment Factors Vehicle - Critical Maneuver Gap (tg) ------------ --------------------- Turn Major Road 5.50 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 Follow-up Time (tf) 2.60 3.30 . 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X.K XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 274 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1006 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1006 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.97. --------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB --------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 548 Potential Capacity: (pcph) - 871 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 871 Prob. of Queue -free State: _ 0.99 --------------------------------------------- Step 4:_LT from Minor Street NB --------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1082 Potential Capacity: (pcph) - 215 Major.LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0,99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: _____________________________________________ (pcph) 213 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX#X#XX#XXXXXXXXXXXX##Y###########XX#XXXX###XY######' Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App -------- ------ ______ ____________ ______ ------- NB L 14 213 18.1 C 8.8 N8 R 26 1006 3.7 A WB L 7 871 4.2 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0.3 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 j HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 Z###Z##XZYYZZ###YZZZ##Y###Z#######ZZZZZ#ZXZ##ZZ##ZXY##ZXYZZZ#ZYX XZZ##YZZY#YY##ZZ#ZZYXZ#Y#XZ#Y##ZZYY#ZZ#ZZZZZZZZZX##Z##Z#YXY#ZZZX File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) office drive (E-W) drake " Major Street Direction.... EW WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) ________________________________________________________ Analyst ................... mjd Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Date of Analysis.......... 18 96 long ----------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) — 200 Other Information......... existing short am pm Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1096 Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1096 Prob. of Queue -free State: 1.00 ' Eastbound Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound -------------------------------------------------------- L T R; L T R; L T R; L _ T R ,____ Step 2: LT from Major Street ________________________________________________________ WB EB ,____ ____ ---- No. Lanes 0 2< i---- ---- .---- 01 1 2 ,---- ____ 0;" 1 0 ---- __-- ---_ 1; 0 0 0 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 400 Stop/Yield ; N; -. N; - , Potential Capacity: (pcph) - 1046 Volumes 397 31 6 439 4 4: I Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1046 PHF" .9 .9; .9 .9'- 9 9; Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.99 Grade 0 , 0 i 0 , 0 ________________________________________________________ MC's (%) -0 0: 0 0 i. 0 Oi" Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB . -SB - Cv's (%) 0 0; .0 0 0 0; - Conflicting Flows: (vph)- 844 PCE's1.- 1.1 1.1 ' 1 1 - 1. t; Potential Capacity: (pcph) 306 - - ----1_1 -'----------------'-------------------------'---'----_____------- Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 " " Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor Adjustment Factors due to Impeding Movements 0.99 " Movement Capacity: (pcph) 304 Vehicle Critical Follow-up -------------------------------------------------------- Maneuver - Gap (tg) Time (tf) - - __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road - 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road .5.50 2.60 - Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 - Page 3 Left Turn Minor Road - 7.00 3.40 I� Intersection Performance Summary - F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay - i Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) ----L --- ---- - --304---- ------ Delay LOS -------- By App 4-- NB -C ----- 12.0 ------- 7.6 NB R 4 1096 3.3 A WB L 8 1046 3.5 A 0.0 - - Intersection Delay =. 0.1 - Center For Microcomputers In Transportation i Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 - XZZY##XXXXXXZXX#XZZYZ#XXXXXZZZZZZZXXZZXZYYXX#XYYZXXXXY##XYZYYXXX ZZZZZZZYXZZ#YYYXXXXXXXZZXZZZYXXXXXYYXXX YYXXYXXXXXXXXXXXXYXYYYYX# File Name ................ I Streets: (N-S) site drive (E-W) drake Major Street Direction.... EW WorkSheet for,TWSC Intersection Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) -------------------------------------------------------- Analyst................... mjd Step 1: RT from Minor Street. NB SB Dateof Analysis.......... ' Other Information........ long -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 274 existing short am pm i .. ' _ Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1006 Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1006 Prob. of Queue -free Stater 0.99 Eastbound I Westbound Northbound ; Southbound . L T R1 L T '=--- R; L T ' R; L T R - Step 2: LT from Major Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB - EB ---- -------- No-Lanes 0 -2< ---- ---- 0; 1 2 ---- ---- 0; 1". 0 ----' 1; 0 0 0 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 547 Stop/Yield,: - N1 N; 1 I Potential Capacity: (pcph) 872 Volumes 541 6; 7 534 1 8; - Movement Capacity: (pcph) 872 PHF•9 .9i .9 .9 .9 .91 Prob. of Queue -free State: - 0.99 Grade0- I 0 i 0 0 _ -------------------------------------------------------- MC's (%) - 0 - 0; 0 0 0 0; .. Step 4:LT from Minor Street NBSB SU/RV's (%)I "0 01 0 0 - 0 - 01 - _ ----------------------------------------- ----------- CV's (%) 0' 0; 0 0 0 01 I Conflicting Flows: (vph) .. 1085 PCE's; 1.1 1.11 1.1 1.1 ; 1.1 1.1; Potential Capacity: (pcph) 214 . ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------- Major. LT. Minor TH ' Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor Adjustment Factors due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 212 Vehicle Critical Follow-up -------------------------------------------------------- Maneuver --------------------------------------------------------------- Gap (tg). Time (tf) . Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 - Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 Left Turn Minor. Road 7.00 3.40 i YYYY#YYYXXXXYXXXXXXXXXXXXYY#X#XXYYYYYXXYXXXX XXXXXYYYYYXXXXXXXXY# -- Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay . - Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh.(pcph) -------- ------ ------ ------ Delay LOS ------------ By App NB L 1 212 ------ 17.1 C --------- 5.1 NB R 10 1006 3.6 A 11 I WB L 9 872 4.2 A 0.1 Intersection Delay - 0.1 - Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 YX###Y#XXXYX#YXX#Y#YXYYXXXXXXYYYYtYY#YY###XXYXYY#YY#Y#Y#XXX#XXXX File Name ................ Streets: (N-S) site drive (E-W) drake Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 6/18/96 Other Information......... existing short long am pm .Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ____-- ---- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R; L T R; L T R; L T R ---- --- ----I --- --------'---- ---- --- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 0 2< 0; 1 2 0; 1 0 1; 0 0 0 Stop/Yield ; N; - N; ; Volumes 396 3I 3 440 1 4 'PHF .9 .9; .9 .9 1 .9 .9: Grade - 0 i 0 0 0 MC's (%) ; 0 0; 0 0 ; 0 0; SU/RV's 0 0; 0 0 0 _ 0; CV's (%) 0 0� 0 0 0 0: PCE's 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1; ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2-1 Page 2 YXYZYYXYXX#XXYxXxXYXXY#Y#x:zzxxxYXYYYYzzXXxzzXzzxxzzzxx#XYYYYXYY WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 200 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1096 1 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1096 Prob. of Queue -free State: 1.00 ------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street ---------------------------------------------- WB EB --------- Conflicting Flows: (vph)" 399 -. Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1047 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1047 Prob. of Queue -free State:" 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB. -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting F1"ows: (vph)- 840 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 307 Major LT. Minor TH Impedance Factor: 1.00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 1.00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 306 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 #YXX#XXxXY####XXXXXXYXX#YY#YXXXXxX#XY#Yx#X#X#XX#XXX#xYYXYYXY#X#X Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By Apo ------ --------- -------- NB L ------ ------ ------ 1 306 ------------ 11.8 C 5.0 NB R 4 1096 3.3 A WB L 3 1047 3.4 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0-0 . HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page n CCCCC ¢OC CnCIInIIn====CCC CC C===CCC==C=C=v=`==CCCCnnnCCCCCCCCCCCOCCCCC Center IIFor IIMicrocomputers InTransportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 v ¢ IIII vcIIIIcav=aIIIIIIIICIIcnII¢¢eve ¢¢¢¢¢¢avII=a¢¢nnII¢¢¢II¢II �IIII IIIIII ¢IIn=__`====IIIIII Streets: (N-S) COLLEGE (E-W) SITE DRIVE Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... MD Date of Analysis........ 6 14/96 Other Information........ ST LT PM Two-way Stop -controlled In errection E 6II6C6CCII---vvnnvCvv=vvvn ¢¢nnvvvvvv¢ --vvn nvvvv CC L -�v nvvv-- ¢v¢ vIICnnCC6CC C66 LNorthbound I LSouthbound I LEastboundR I LWestboundR No. Lanes 0 3 < 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI ($) SU/RV-s ($) CVIa ($) PCE-s N 606 5 .95 .95 0 --------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road _ 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road - 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 215 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1077 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1077 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- --------- 3.4 WB R 3 1077 3.4 0.0 A Intersection Delay ¢ 0..0 Dec/veh Page 2 ECS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page Center ForMicrocomputersIn Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) COLLEGEccc===c======ccncv=====c(E-W) OTELcDRIVE ac Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... MD Date of Analysis........ 14/96 Other Information........ EX ST LT AM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection =�eaeveee------------as-ems LNorthboundd I LSouthboundd I LEastboundR I LWestboundR No. Lanes 0 3< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 808 1 5 PEF .95 .95 - .95 Grade 0 0 MCI 8 M SD/RVIs M CVIa M PCE.8 1.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) __________________________________________________________________ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road _ 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 284 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 994 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 994 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (peph)(sec/veh) (veh) -_-- (sec/veh) _____________--------- 3.6 WB R 6 994 3.6 0.0 A Intersection Delay - 0.0 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page ........... aannn CenterForMicrocomputersaInTransportationaa==_-=a-annnnna=--===_a University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 __= v c = = nnn-c-==-vccvcccccc===-ccc acne==cee=vvavc Streets:a(N-S) COLLEGEaa (E-W) HOTEL DRIVE Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... MD Date of Analysis.......... 14/96 Other Information........ ST LT PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection can------_ - -c c = a-= avcan====mvcvv LNorthboundd alaLSouthboundd al LEastboundR I LWestboundR No. Lanes 0 3 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 608 1 1 PHF 1 .95 .95 .95 Grade MC' a M SU/RV's M CV's M PCE's .0 0 I I 1 1.10 ----------- _-------------- _-------------- _-------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver _ Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road - - 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WE EE Conflicting Flows: (vph) 214 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1079 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1079 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total . Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (peph)(see/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) ________ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ _____ ________ 3.3 WE R 1 1079 3.3 0.0 A Intersection Delay 0.0 sec/veh Page 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page Center =For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 StreetsIIe(N-S) COLLEGE(E-W) THUNDERBIRD Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... MD Date of Analysis.......... 6/14/96 Other Information.......ST IT AM PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection R Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes ---- ---- ---- 0 3 < 0 ---- ---- ---- 1 0 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 ---- ---- ---- 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 790 18 33 43 PH? - .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 00 MC'e ($) SU/RV-s ($) CV'a ($) PCE's ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle -. Critical - Follow-up . Maneuver Gap (tg) - Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road - 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 - 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HCS: Unsiga=lized Intersections Release 2.1c Pag ntosectionlea1age 2 Worksheet for TWSC .Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 287 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 991 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 991 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.95 Step 2: IT from Major Street SB--------- NB ---------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 851 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 599 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 599 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.93 ________________________________________________________ Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- -------------- 3.8 WB R 50 991 3.8 0.0 A SB L 39 599 6.4 0.1 B 6.4 Intersection Delay = 0.4 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 1 a a aca=vv vvv as =aca=van =avva=aavvcv=aaacaaaaavcaccaa a aca sac aavav v= aaa a vc= Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, PL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 - c aaa va aavvvvaeea=sacs=aaava=aaaaaa=aaavavaaaanavccc=aavvvacaa Streets: a(N-S)aCOLLEGE (E-W) THUNDERBIRD Major Street Direction.... NS Length of'Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... MD Date of Analysis.......... 14/96 Other Information ........ .EX ST LT PM Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection aaaaaaaaaa as=Northbound a Southboundaa aaEastboundaa Westbound .L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- --------.---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 3 < 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes- 596 8 21 _ 30 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 MC's M SU/RV's M CV's M PCE's 1.10 1.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- AdjustmentFactors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road - 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 RCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 2 aaavaccccvavccvvcaa=aaaacaaaaaaaaaaavaavaacaaccaaaaaaa=aaaacaa=aavaaeaa 'Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 213 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1080 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1080 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: IT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 635 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 782 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 782 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.97 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sac/veh) -------- ------ ------ ------------- ------- ----- --------- 3.4 WB R 35 1080 3.4 0.0 A SB L 24 782 4.7 0.0 A 4.7 Intersection Delay 0.3 sec/veh HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 06-16-1996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation --------------- Streets: (E-W) (E-W) drake (N-S) college Analyst: Matt File Nam Area Type: Other 6-18-96 am pm Comment- existing short long ______________________________________ ________________ Eastbound ' Westbound ' Northbound Southbound L T R L T R; L T R L T R --------l---- --------'---- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 < 1 3 1 Volumes 294 497 157: 108 406 220; 157 1308 54; 112 771 159 PHF or PK1510.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.9010.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.90 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 :12.0 12.0 12.0 Grade . 0 0 i 0 0 % Heavy-Veh; 1 1 1; 1 1 1; 1 1 1; 1 1 1 Parking ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N .:(Y/N) N Bus Stops ; 0: - 0; 0; 0 Con: Peds. 0;_ - 0; 0; 0 Ped Button ;(Y/N) Y 23.5 sl(Y/N) Y 26.5 s:(Y/N) Y 20.5 s;(Y/N) Y 20.5 Arr Type ;. 3 3 3; . 3 -. 3 3; 3 5 3 5 3 RTOR Vols 0: 0; 0; 0 Lost Time :3.00 3.00 3.0013.00 5-00 3.00;3.00 3.00 3.00;3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; 1 I Prop. Prot.; 1 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * :NB Left Thru * - Thru Right * Right Peds Peds - .WB Left * * ;SB Left Thru * - Thru * - Right * Right Peds Peds - NB Right ;EB Right SB Right * 1WB Right Green 13.OA 27.OA ;Green 12..OA 30.OP Yellow/AR - 4.0 5.0 :Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 Cycle Length: 100-secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 ------------ ------------------------------- ____________________________ Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS_ Delay LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ---- ----- --- ----- --- ES L 391 1787 0-636 0.310 24.5 C 21.9 C T - "1091 3762 0.532 0.290 23.1 C R 720 1599 0..242 0.450 12.9 B WB L - 349 1787 0.344 0.310 13.0 8 18.3 C T 1091 3762 0.434 0.290 22.1 C R 720 1599 0.339 0.450 13-7 B NB L - 308 17.87. .0.565 0.290 14.3 B 20.1 C TR- 1795 5610 0--927-.0.320 20.7 C SB. L 308 1787 0.403 0.290 15.2 C 14.2 B T 1806 5644 0.522 0.320 14.6 B _- R 784 1599 0.226 0.490 11.1 B Intersection Delay = 18.7 sec/veh Intersection LOS = C Lost Time/Cycle. L = 9.O sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.779 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4a 06-1871996 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) drake (N-S) college Analyst: Matt File Name: Area Type- Other 6-16-96 am pin Comment: exis in short long Eastbound ' Westbound ;. Northbound Southbound L T R; L T R L T R: L T R ---- ----:---- ---- ----I---- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1; 1 3< 1 3 1 Volumes 256 540 303: 172 575 145; 323 1593 100; 268 1986 371 PHF or PK15;0-90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0-90:0.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.90 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12-0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 :12.0 12-0 12.0 - Grade 0 i 0 0 _ ; 0 % Heavy Veh; 1 1 11- 1 1 1; 1 1- 1; 1 1 1 Parking ;(Y/N) N .;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N :(Y/N) N BusStops0; 0; 0; - 0 Con- Peds ; 0; 0; 0: 0 Ped Button :(Y/N) Y 23.5 s;(Y/N)'Y 26.5 s:(Y/N) Y 20.5 s:(Y/N) Y 20.5. Arr Type 3 3 3; -3 3 3; 3 5 3 5 .3 RTOR Vols 1 0; 0; 0: 0 Lost Time 13.00 3.00 3.00;3.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3-00:3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; I I - Prop: Prot-; ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4; 5 6 7 8 EB Left * * ;NB Left j Thru * Thru Right * Right * ' J Peds Peds WB Left * * - _ :SB Left Thru * Thru Right * Right Peds Peds NB Right ;EB Right SB Right * jWB Right - Green 16.OA 23.OA _ ;Green 20.OA 43-OP Yellow/AR 4.0 5-0 ;Yellow/AR 4.0 5.0 j Cycle Length:.120 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 _______________________________________________________________________ Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C -Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS ----- ---- ------- ----- ----- ----- --- ----- --- EB L 316 1787 0.899 0.308 42.8 E 34.8 D T 784 3762 0.804 0.208 38.6 0 R 653 1599 0.516 0.406 20.8 C WB L 316 1787 0.604 0.308 23.9 C 34.4 D T- 784 3762 0.856 0.208 41.3 E R 653 1599" 0.247 0.408 17.8 C NB L 376 1787 0.955 0.375 54.3 E 29.5 D TR 2097 5593 0.986 0.375 25.3 D SB L 376 1787 0.793 0.375 33.6 D T 2116 5644 1.148 0.375 R - 866 1599 0.476 0.542 13.2 B Intersection Delay = * (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = ;- (g/C)*(V/c) is greater than one. Calculation of D1 is infeasable. APPENDIX A Table 3 Short Term Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM College/Drake (signal) C D College/Thunderbird (stop sign) ,.WB RT A A. SB LT A B College/Motel Drive (stop sign) WB RT A A College/Consolidated Drive (stop sign) WB RT A A Drake/Consolidated Drive (stop sign) NB RT A A Table 4 Long Term Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM College/Drake (signal) D College/Thunderbird (stop sign) WB RT A SB LT B College/Motel Drive (stop sign) WB RT A College/Consolidated Drive (stop sign) WB RT A Drake/Consolidated Drive (stop sign) NB RT A * Level of service calculation infeasible be level. of service F. A B A A A This is considered to Ilk LONG TERM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 nm i rm SHORT TERM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 Table 1 Existing Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM College/Drake (signal) C College/Thunderbird (stop sign) WB RT A A SB LT A B College/Motel Drive (stop sign) WB RT A. A College/Sinclair Drive (stop sign) WB RT A A Drake/Sinclair Drive (stop sign) NB LT C C NB RT A A WB LT _ A A Drake/Office Drive (stop sign) NB LT C C NB RT A A WB LT A A * Level of service calculation infeasible. This is considered to be level of service F. Table 2 . Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Convenience/gas store 8 fueling positions 1300 45. 45 54 54 r�9 id � J111� aa 000 ^ 220/145LO 406/575 % 108/172 — 733/891 /,-- 3/7 DRAKE ROAD — 732/886 /— 6/5 N —f 294/256 -1 } 660/902 -�- �/ 661/904 -� 497/540 -�- —� 157/303 - M M o �\� 3/6 - \� 3/6 N N �o M '1ff� �-3/6 Counts are for two access on each street. f r z CD WE) > �L LO W C7 W J J O U 1 /5 a C) Cq \\\ 0/1 � ` 2 /24 THUDRIVE NDERBIRD 30/43 �-- W 00 \� 16 443 — 12/4 - � ao N LO S Legend: AM PM Denotes Lanes 1996 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AND GEOMETRY Figure 1 Planning efforts should focus on providing additional capacity at this intersection or alternate routes. In summary, the proposed widening, access control, and re- development projects provide a unique opportunity to facilitate and expedite improved roadway operations. If pursued as currently proposed the following con occur: 1) the City of Fort Collins can provide substantial roadway improvements, and 2) Sinclair can provide a modern, efficient convenience/gas store. This will result in a benefit to the general public with improved traffic operations, easy/efficient access, and increased safety in the study area. This is reinforced by the fact that most site traffic will be drawn from the passing traffic stream. Provision of dual east/west left - turn lanes on Drake Road will improve the operation of this intersection into acceptable categories. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the above documented analyses, investigations, and findings the following can be concluded. 1. Existing conditions are acceptable in the immediate area of the site with the exception of the College/Drake intersection which operates at LOS F during the afternoon peak hour. 2.. Site generated traffic will primarily be drawn from the passing traffic streams. 3. Driveway activity at the Sinclair development is estimated at 90 morning peak hour trips, 108 afternoon peak hour trips and 1300 trip ends per day. This is considerably higher than the trip generation at the existing facility. 4. The proposed widening at the College/Drake intersection will provide additional roadway .capacity and reduce the number of vehicles cutting across the Sinclair site. This is due to the fact that the northbound right turn from College Avenue to Drake Road will no longer be blocked by through vehicles in a shared lane. 5. Short term operations are expected to be acceptable from a level of service standpoint. All stop sign y controlled movements are expected to operate at LOS B or better, while the College/Drake intersection / will operate LOS D or better. 6. The proposed access consolidations will result in fewer vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle conflicts, thereby, decreasing the area's accident potential. 7. Closing the frontage road to the north of Thunderbird Drive will minimize stacking conflicts by moving this traffic to the east. Therefore, a reduction in congestion potential in the area of the College/Thunderbird intersection can be expected. 8. Long term traffic operations are expected to be acceptable at all intersections with the exception of the College/Drake intersection. At this intersection LOS F operations can be expected, if the anticipated traffic volumes are realized. Sinclair development is expected to generate 90 morning peak hour trips, 108 afternoon peak hour trips and 1,300 trip ends per day. It should be noted that most site related traffic is expected to be drawn from the passing traffic stream. This is characteristic of the proposed land use. Given this fact, site traffic distribution should be generally consistent with the directional distribution of the adjacent traffic stream. Additionally, no reductions have been taken to account for traffic currently generated by the existing Sinclair station. Accordingly, a conservative analysis is presented. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Short term traffic volumes (1996/1997) were developed using the existing traffic counts, site traffic volumes, and the modified access scheme. Current traffic volumes were increased appropriately. An insignificant increase in roadway traffic volumes is expected due to site traffic. Long term traffic was estimated by factoring current traffic upward by 20 percent. This is almost a one percent per year increase. This is considered reasonable for year 2015 conditions. Total future peak hour traffic is presented on Figure 2 for short term conditions with long term conditions shown on Figure 3. FUTURE OPERATING CONDITIONS Short Term Capacity analyses were conducted at all key intersections to assess operations with the proposed Sinclair development, the widened College/Drake intersection, and the modified access scheme along College Avenue and Drake Road. Short term operating conditions are presented in Table 3. Calculation forms are provided in appendix B. As shown, acceptable conditions can be expected in the short term with the College/Drake intersection expected to operate at LOS D or better. For the most part, however, all other locations will operate at LOS A. Long Term Long term operations were evaluated using the traffic volumes shown on Figure 3. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. This operation is shown in Table 4. This analysis indicated that all minor (limited turn) intersections will operate at LOS B or better during the peak hours. Less than desirable operations may be experienced at the College/Drake signalized intersection. This will occur if traffic volume projections materialize as assumed and no additional roadway capacity is provided. In any event, site traffic is considered to be negligible at the College/Drake intersection and is not expected to adversely impact operations. stop sign controlled intersections, LOS C or better operation is being experienced. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed improvements reflect three independent yet related actions. These actions are described below. 1. Widening of the College/Drake intersection to provide dual left turn lanes and exclusive right turn lanes in both directions on College Avenue. This is expected to minimize the number of vehicles. cutting through the Sinclair site, since the northbound right turns will have an exclusive lane. On Drake Road, a raised median and a bike lane will be installed in the immediate area of the intersection. The median will extend through the study area on the east leg of Drake Road. 2. In conjunction with the planned improvements, the number and location of access points will be modified along College Avenue, Drake Road and Thunderbird Drive. Along College Avenue, two driveways are proposed between Thunderbird and Drake. One to serve the Sinclair site and the motel. The other is to the south serving the motel and the Moot House restaurant. The north leg of the Thunderbird/Frontage Road intersection will also be closed. The two Sinclair site drives and the drive serving the retail/office development to the east of the Sinclair will be consolidated. This will result in a shared driveway along Drake Road. The office/commercial area to the east of the Sinclair will continue to retain an access to Drake Road at their east property line. All driveways to College Avenue and Drake Road will be limited to right -in and right -out movements. 3. The existing Sinclair station will be demolished and replaced with a gas/convenience store. Eight fueling stations and a 3000 square foot convenience store are planned. All of the above activity is expected to occur concurrently. It is expected to be completed later in 1996 or early 1997. SITE TRAFFIC Site generated traffic was estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation, Fifth Edition and the 1995 Update to this publication. Resultant site traffic volumes are presented on Table 2. As shown, the proposed co w LO O Co 0 Q 0 0 U 0 z a w J w 0 w a w J 0 N N N W a V J W 0 mi ■ r■ r MEMORANDUM v CM O `n TO: Tom Richards, Sinclair Oil Corporation City of Fort Collins 6 r FROM: Matt Delich -9e rn DATE: June 21, 1996 SUBJECT: Expansion of Sinclair Station and access consolidation in the southeast corner of College/Drake intersection (File: 9633MEM1) O N 0) co This technical memorandum evaluates the traffic impacts 0 of a new Sinclair Station/Convenience Store in the southeast corner of the College/Drake intersection. The existing w Sinclair Station will be replaced with an expanded gas/C-Store Z facility. The expansion is expected to occur in conjunction a with the city's planned widening at the College/Drake intersection. An access consolidation program is also planned. This will result in fewer overall access points, shared driveways, and some restricted turning movements. Current and future conditions are described and evaluated in the following sections. EXISTING CONDITIONS Current operating conditions were assessed using the morning and afternoon peak hour traffic volumes collected as part of this study. This information is presented on Figure 1. The geometry at the College/Drake intersection is also shown in Figure 1. The intersection is signalized. z. Historically, it has been reported that vehicles bypass the wsignal by cutting through the Sinclair site from northbound z College Avenue to eastbound Drake Road. a W Intersection operations were also evaluated at all Z driveways from Thunderbird Drive to Drake Road along College aAvenue and from College Avenue to the driveway serving the local commercial development east of the Sinclair site along °a Drake Road. Current peak hour levels of service are shown on Z Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix A. 19 Acceptable operations are currently being experienced at all locations except the College/Drake intersection which Ca Ca operates at level of service(LOS) F during the afternoon peak a: hour. Rather than assigning a specific number of right turns U. which would occur during the perpendicular left -turn phase, F- the evaluation assumed that a right -turn arrow existed for the exclusive right -turn lanes. This technique would allow right - turns -on -red only. during a safe phase of the signal cycle. This approach seemed conservative and appropriate. At all