Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLEVON'S MINOR SUBDIVISION - H-C SITE PLAN REVIEW - 19-96 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONSI 11 f8. The proposed grading plan shows off -site grading on the property to the south. Off -site grading will require an off -site grading easement from adjacent property owner's. Response: 9. Please provide calculations to check the capacity of the 4' inlet along I-Eckory Street. The inlet mus(tJ be sized for off -site runoff on FEckory Street. /? ' Response: ` =��'�, �lti� h• 10-1c�.'DeIGNr�O ll'1Il vje-�,c<I, C��vr•T 1^s�e�h� is Lj a S� Co'tD�� 1sti. so 7'^Pre 0111 c�� •t^ (,� o r flora' Please refer to the redhned repoLand plans fors additional review comments. h u r J2. Please provide copies of the off -site drainage easement and the temporary construction easement fortheoutfall swale through Salyer Open Space. Response �`e . � t/ Flo swje , aw vler 6-5Pic VC rej 6--(e,�r for �l(� rr,{ � S m r� fw -{b 5 �cd..^ � , �n�Q�c�.�r-t•� lug R- s �` � �ypp �"GMc�_ c� vlo+ GCvo'5 �i chat/ Dp=n �I c 3. Please show details of the outfadfor the existing storm sewer under Hickory. The expansion of Hickory is adding impervious area to this drainage outfall. Where does the drainage go? Is there an existing easement for the outfall? Or, isaneasement needed? l Response: �� �, S 4 r v A Lv n f, , h rm w v l t l t^ fJ G 5 �/ 1, c v/v e •T T �i5 rr� eL') Sri (2UK sn k 0.14n Dce r rS��e 7 Dr 4 * Please show off -site contours on the west side of the site. The flows from this off -site basin must be calculated and must pass through the site like historical conditions. The 6' wall is shown to block off -site flows. Blocking off -site flows is only acceptable, if a drainage easement is provided from the property to the west. baaL /�$0 c_D-, -ours ry v, 0,0 fZD � (.,)Cs Response: r N cQ wC C n 1 , 1 L rvt jj rr 6C t_j DOGr G ��2 6 ,jeC L4_` t EfIS�t� �/Le�i'Irlot, W<<I rb� (Za !� C`CD b 0 � y "'a- pew "FP'"�- .i 5. Please specify that maintenance of the off -site channel will be the responsibility of the property owner of the proposed site. The erosion control measures must also be maintained until the swale is fully vegetated. Response: %16ts l Z r C �� �s-� l�, k e.Q J6. The proposed on -site channel must not be within the dedicated right-of-way for Fourth Street. The channel could be piped under the right-of-way. A drainage easement must be dedicated for rrl1the on -side Swale. Response: 1�-e- 5 L-*l t5 Ho kv%°r� l K4-t &-a fb GR 1e_0 nsf v v c�e�} , (1JL cam¢_ 7ti o t o-Irt itp tom/ +o f r co- ry n e- f{ L�/t11Ce .,--�►^G-T/g.n , �'w'rG ,,-O,.nq �cre5e ✓'�' ✓ cx[srtuf 6NE6T47 Fi�w Cs-�cf�e�s V�Vs 6�scfisse4p &01&SCI /irtJ,je'I 7. The time of concentration for the site was calculated assuming overland flow for the ` entire travel time. The proposed swale through the site causes the runoff to become channelized with a much smaller travel time. Please recalculate the peak runoff from the site considering channelized flow for the timg of concentration calculations. ll0 Response: ]� #�� oc r5 t, ( IIAL c e�nc�.� �,-tied) �c�. of -a" Sw Cjes , wll( L �c<«,%-�.t�,e.�QS n'-'kr4II o6-CL)✓'5 . PROJECT COMMENT SHEET C'iiy of Fort Conies Current Planning DATE: 7 10 - 96 DEPT: Stormwater PROJECT: PLANNER /�1, %re All comments Imusfbe received by: ❑ No Problems � Problems or Concerns (see below or attached) A written response for each of the following comments must be submitted, with the redlined plans and report, at time of project resubmittal. The responses must note any revisions or clarifications completed in result of these comments. If responses are not submitted with the resubmittal, the project will be returned to the applicant without further review. This procedure will help the review process become more efficient and effective. Thank you. Note: Further discussion between Stormwater and the Natural Resources Dept. is needed regarding the outfall swale. We plan to meet with Natural Resources to confirm the location, intent, operation, and maintenance of the swale that is proposed in the Salyer Open Space. This meeting will take place within the next week At that time, additional comments may be provided regarding the Swale. 1. The drainage from this development is proposed to outlet into the Josh Ames Canal. Drainage into the abandoned canal will not be allowed. Drainage from this development must be diverted directly to the Poudre River. PQ�r Cl(scAJss•oh w�a�► w�u b� sw� �� > Response: josi j4me5 P(e- gse hew Scev,a to is rcvV prc.t.�w� Apoe4 Date. 7 !1 G — F� Signature:�G� CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT 66: I`hceri 414"' COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE M4,dCUi ❑T7 LANDSCAPE • Levon's Warehouse and office building - plan review (page 2 of 2) July 11, 1996 V,p5 Sheet 2 4 S i� , 0� 4. The new RCP pipe for drainage needs to be extended so that it goes past the ROW. r.5. Label the 10 foot concrete path along the west edge of the property. 6. The block wall needs to be entirely on this property. ✓l cw WooV ! t sJ'— W t PL- t) 7. A type III barricade needs to be placed across the sidewalk and new pavement at the east edge of this property where the road is being widened out. Need to make sure this stays out of the railroad property. ✓ol� 8. Hickory street x-section: Indicate the amount of additional paving that will be done (what is the flowline to flowline dimension?), this should be the same as Hickory Street to the east. Indicate the existing slope of the road where the tie in is to occur and what the new pavement slope is to be. Sheet 3 OiL 9. Show how the new flowline location is to meet existing grade. Looks like some grading/ fill may be needed. In addition what is to be done where the sidewalk ends next to the concrete path, this sidewalk will sit 6 inches higher than the flowline which appears to be higher than the adjacent path. 0v,— 10. Indicate what the driveway width is to be and the location of the drive from the property line. l5 Ong�co SL w 'VRorlc SvJL4Sy ri J PROJECT COMMENT SHEET City of Fort Collins Current Planning DATE: June 14, 1996 DEPT: Engineering - Ping PROJECT: # 19-96 Levon's Minor Subdivision - North College Site Plan Review PLANNER: Mike Ludwig All comments must be received by: June 28, 1996 Levon's Warehouse and office building - plan review July 11, 1996 Plat - 1. A nine foot utility easement should be provided along the 11ickory street frontage. ,V2. Any easements needed for drainage should also be dedicated on this plat at this time. Site Plan/ Landscape plan AOV2 w oop) 1. Make sure the block wall remains entirely on your property. j %V% / 2. The ivy to be planted on the west side of the block wall does not appear to be on this property. Need permission from *glibor to plant on there property In additi n who is to maintain and water these plants. so 4 it p a5 0Z 4, `� a, t b i �- r d^ ow Pt Wilt 6 Xortp tre-�{cp Utility plans f,10. General note 1 should be modified to reference the Director of Engineering not the City Engineer. 2.The last note under the general notes (number 1) says that this plan does not meet the `customary 2% minimum standard' and that the developers responsible for request g a variance. t f What does this apply to? Drainage, streets? :fj� it S I,I.�TL�."^ f !O \n 51 rM CaJ P1r (�t'� f � 3. All off site easements are needed prior to oir� to a lanrung and zoning board or approv and /or the signing of the mylars. (Continued on next page) _ J I I /�i Date: Signs �-- j CHECK IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE ❑ PLAT COPIES OF REVISIONS ❑ SITE ❑ LANDSCAPE ❑ UTILITY E Please provide a written response to each of the above stated comments with the submittal of plan revisions. An administrative hearing will be scheduled with the Director of Planning after each of the issues have been addressed/resolved. Please contact me at 221-6206 if you have any questions or concerns related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments. Sincerely, Michael Ludwig Project Planner xc: Sheri Wamhoff Stormwater Utility file/Project Planner 1 J OV I. J M. .phi. ,"1 © IL 5 S. (°V Of-- t. J, Please provide dimensions for the drive lane and typical parking stalls. There should be a landscaped island at approximately the mid -point of the row of parking stalls. Also, there should be a landscaped island at each end of the row of parking stalls to provide separation from the trash enclosures. This will prevent cars from hitting the enclosures. The Building Envelope may need to be increased as no awnings or building projections may extend outside of the building envelope. An east/west sidewalk extension is needed from the entrance drive to the building. Please delete General Notes 3,5,6,7,8,9,10, and 11 from the Landscape Plan as they have no relevance to this development request. Please choose different symbols for Peking Cotoneaster, English Ivy, and Gold Drop Potentella as they are difficult to differentiate on the Landscape Plan. Please label the species and diameter of any existing trees, etc. and designate which are to remain and those which are to be removed. Landscaping is needed along the eastern edge of the parking lot (shrubs and trees). ' Additional landscaping is needed along the north side of the proposed building. U. Please designate building materials and colors on the building elevations. Additional architectural features are needed on the north elevation in Jaccordance with H-C Standard #19 which states: 'No blank wall that faces t,a public street shall exceed 50 feet in length.' W. Additional architectural features may be needed along the west elevation. Please discuss this with the Current Planning staff. V)ax ✓ pK, x. Please provide elevations of the proposed trash dumpsters. This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. b. Please add a note to the Landscape Plan which states: 'AII shrubs must be separated a minimum of 4 feet from all water and sewer mains and services.' There appear to be conflicts on the north side of the proposed building. 10. The Mapping Department requests that all easements be shown on the Plat. 11. Comments from the Engineering Department are attached. 12. Comments from the Stormwater Utility are attached. 13. The Current Planning Department offers the following comments: "V a. Please label the Site Plan as "Sheet 1 of 3'; the Landscape Plan as 'Sheet b 2 of 3'; and the Building Elevations as'Sheet 3 of 3 to-' b. Please provide a scale and north arrow for the vicinity map on the Site Plan. C. The Site Statistics and General Notes should be moved to another location d� on the Site Plan as they conflict with notes designating surrounding land uses. t0�-- bY-, d. Please add a note to the Site Plan which states that 'All roof -top mechanical equipment is to be fully screened from public view.' e. In the 'Site Statistics', please show provide a breakdown for the number of square feet of the proposed building, parking and drives, and landscaped area. LSza f. Please delete the 'Site Statistic' which references developed gross density. Density refers to residential development, not warehouse and office uses. g. Please correct the spelling of the word 'Collins' in General Note 1. h. Please add a note to the Site Plan which states: 'All trash dumpsters are to be fully enclosed and gated. Enclosures are to be constructed with materials and colors similar to the warehouse/office building.' i. Please delete General Note 5 and replace it with a note which states: "All signage to comply with the City Sign Code." j. Please delete General Note 6. k. Please revise the existing Planning and Zoning Board Certification to state 'Planning Certification: Approved by the Director of Planning of the City of Fort Collins, Colorado on this day of 1 1996.' Wz 14,408 c� Iq-r°o 16 E �c 3. Soon d. The developer needs to coordinate a transformer location and development ✓ charges with the Light and Power Engineering Department. The Right -of -Way Agent requests that the City owned 20' strip be shown on the plat as Parcel 2. 4. The Parks Department offers the following comments: ,�J A a. The area adjacent to Legacy Park may receive overflow foot traffic and equipment placement during the New West Festival. �tXV Please prepare an easement request with legal description, etc. for any J necessary easement(s) needed from the Citys Parks Department. 5. The Poudre Fire Authority offers the following comments: a. This building exceeds five thousand (5,000) square feet and must be fire contained or fire sprinklered. - If fire containment is used, a fire access < �0 roadway must be provided around the building with turning radii of 20 feet inside, and 40 feet outside. The road must be constructed of road base or better construction and maintained year around. 5Q<`r b. If the building is fully fire sprinklered, the access as shown will meet fire department concerns. / C. A fire hydrant is required within 400 feet of the building capable of 1,000 r gallons per minute at a residual of 20 pounds pressure. We recommend a hydrant at the entrance to the property. 6. Public Service Company stated that a minimum 10 foot wide utility easement is t needed adjacent to the Hickory Street right-of-way or Fourth Street (south property line). 7 The Pavement Management Division of the Engineering Department stated that ✓ all projects initiated after April 12, 1996 shall follow the new Pavement Design and Technical Criteria guidelines. TCI of Fort Collins states that they have a cable running east/west on the south side of Hickory Street. The Water and Wastewater Utility offers the following comments: a. Please add a note to the Landscape Plan which states: 'All trees must be separated a minimum of 10 feet from all water and sewer mains and services.' AM �i Citv of Fort Collins Comm• ty Planning and EnvironmentAervices Current Planning July 22, 1996 Charlie Meserlian T. 966� 6 Z 9(ld - c/o Joe Marcisofsky 318 E. Oak Street \' r Structured Engineering Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Joe, Staff has reviewed your documents for the Levon's Warehouse and Office Building that were submitted on June 24, 1996, and would like to offer the following comments: 1. The Building Inspections Department offers the following comments: J�Q'`\a. A minimum 6% of the interior of the parking lot must be landscaped. Please LJrr��l �e r� refer to the Parking Lot Development Guide for further information. Co"'' J 'C'j� b. Please add a note to the landscape plan which states: "AII landscaping shall be installed or secured with an irrevocable letter of credit, performance bond, or escrow account for 125% of the valuation of the materials and installation prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy." J �<<C. 10 foot wide landscape strips are required along Hickory Street in front of the paved driveway/parking. It is unclear what width is currently shown. Please revise and/or clarify. t 2. The Light and Power Utility offers the following comments: \o �'la. An eight foot wide utility easement is needed along the north, south, and bi tlpe� aS west property lines. f b. There is an existing fiberglass electric vault near the northeast comer of the 0 site (not shown on the utility plan). If this vault needs to be relocated, or have the grade adjusted, it will be at the developer's expense. c. There will also be costs to the developer to relocate the overhead line to ✓ underground in addition to normal electric development charges. 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-05M • (970) 221-b750 FAX (970) 221-6378 • TDD (970) 224-o002