Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFAITH FAMILY HOSPITALITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSE - FDP - FDP170027 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS01/04/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Redlines corrected. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 04/20/2017 04/20/2017: Please remove the Civil plans from the Architectural plans index on the cover sheet. These need to be separate plan sets. Response: Redlines corrected. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-68209 nhahn@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/06/2017 04/06/2017: Work with engineering to determine the scope and extent of alley improvements. Response: Alley improvements as shown on these drawings and as required by Engineering. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/06/2017 04/06/2017: The anticipated change in traffic volume is not expected to rise to the threshold of needing a TIS. Based on section 4.2.3.D of LCUASS, the Traffic Impact Study requirement can be waived. Response: Noted Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/17/2017 04/17/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson @fcgov.com Response: Will be handled at time of Building Department Permit submittal Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/23/2016 04/18/2017: The note that was added to all three sheets regarding the floodplain use permit refers to the floodway. The 2nd and 3rd comments refer to floodway, but this one should be floodplain, not floodway. 12/23/2016: On Sheets C3.0, C4.0 and C5.0 of the Utility Plans, add a note stating that a floodplain use permit will be required before beginning any construction activities (remodel the existing building, driveways, sidewalks, parking lot, utility work, landscaping, etc.) in the City -regulated 100-year floodplain. Response: Notes have been updated on Sheets C3.0, C4.0 & C5.0 Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, "countyCfcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/04/2017 04/20/2017: The elevation of benchmark 6-00 is incorrect on sheet C1.2. 01/04/2017: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. Response: The elevation of benchmark 6-00 is now correct on Sheet C1.2 Comment Number: 12 04/20/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 01/04/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Redlines corrected. Topic: Easements Comment Originated: 01/04/2017 Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 04/20/2017 04/20/2017: The Fire Line Easement legal description is missing a course. Response: Fire Line Easement has been updated. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/04/2017 04/20/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. 01/04/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Redlines corrected. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 04/20/2017 04/20/2017: The titles do not match on sheet A1.2. See redlines. Response: Titles corrected Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 04/20/2017 04/20/2017: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Response: Redlines corrected. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 04/20/2017 04/20/2017: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Response: Redlines corrected. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/04/2017 04/20/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/30/2016 04/18/2017: Please provide the report/email from Soilogic referenced in the comment response. This should be included in the drainage report. 12/30/2016: For final, the depth required to reach well -draining soils will need to be specified for the dry well. Response: Soils Report added to Appendix A of the Drainage Report Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/05/2017 04/18/2017: Please provide additional detail about the north end of paving. That appears to be the high point and direct flows south to Magnolia; however, additional detail is needed about any proposed grading and the transition to the existing alley. 01/05/2017: Please document the change in runoff due to the proposed alley paving and provide discussion of how runoff from the alley will reach either Magnolia and Olive. While it is relatively clear that runoff from the southern portion of the alley is routed to Magnolia thru the proposed curb and gutter, it is not clear what happens in the northern portion of the alley where the proposed paving stops. It is important to show that runoff from this northern section is properly routed and will not cause adverse impact to adjacent properties. Response: Additional detail has been added to the Northwest corner of the site to of what the drainage for that area is doing. provide a better picture Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/19/2017 04/19/2017: Please include a brief discussion of LID requirements for the site itself and how they are being met in the drainage report. Response: A brief LID discussion has been added to the 'III. Drainage Criteria' section of the drainage report. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, ischiam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/27/2016 04/18/2017: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon redlines), an Erosion Control Report (Based upon redline comments), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (updated based upon the changes to the Erosion Control Plan redlines). If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com 12/27/2016: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft., therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon redlines), an Erosion Control Report (Based upon redline comments), and an Escrow / Security Calculation (Not submitted). If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ ischlam@fcgov.com Response: Erosion control redlines have been addressed. Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtavlor@fcqov.com Topic: Floodplain Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 04/21 /2017: Discussion at the staff review meeting indicated many of the backyard/side light fixtures will be removed. If this is the case, please update the drawings to show their removal. If any light fixtures are remaining in place or new fixtures added, please submit catalog cut -sheets with fixture specifications. As a reminder, all fixtures must be down -directional and fully -shielded. Response: The intent is to leave the exterior lighting as is, except for relocating the rear lights at fence line. These existing lights will be moved along with the fence (to allow for new parking lot). Lights will only be replaced if not working currently. Down -directional and fully -shielded lights will be provided. 01/03/2017: Repeat comment with Environmental Planning: Identify on the site plan the location of any existing outdoor lighting or any newly -proposed lighting. If new lighting or light fixtures are proposed, we will need catalog cut -sheets of the light fixture details. All light fixtures must fully -shield the light source and be down -directional. Response: No new lights are being added, this project will only entail relocating lights or existing lights to remain. This is shown on site plan. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 04/17/2017 04/14/2017: Please update the cover sheet to include the City's standard site plan notes as well as owner authorization and Planning Approval signature blocks (see emailed samples for formatting). Response: Owner Authorization and Planning Approval signature blocks added. City's Standard Site Plan notes updated. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 04/17/2017 04/14/2017: Several minor updates are needed to the site plan data table: - Remove the 'n' (ration) from the Rear lot floor area ratio line - Include the font parking spaces in the overall parking count, and identify that one space is designed as handicap - Replace the 'xx' with a figure for average number of adult residents per family Response: Data table updated. Parking stalls are accurate as shown. There are 6 stalls in the rear parking lot, there are two available in front (one in each driveway). The south driveway is designated as ADA. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 04/17/2017 04/14/2017: Based on updated information submitted, the following land use code sections require four modifications: - LUC 3.8.6(B) — Maximum permissible residents and separation distance - LUC 4.8(1))(2)(a)(4) — Floor area - LUC 4.8(E)(4) — Wall height at minimum side yard setback. This still needs final verification with a site measurement on the 1990s rear addition. Response: All modifications have been granted and appeal period has been completed. See attached notification. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/30/2016 04/18/2017: Please see updated redlines (pdf). 12/30/2016: Please see redlined plans and drainage report. Response: Redlines corrected. Response: Will address during building department permit submittal 04/21/2017: Comment updated - See below, based on 4/20/17 site visit. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 04/18/2017 04/18/2017: CODE COMPLIANCE Plans sheet: A1.0 should also comply with 2012 International Fire Code (IFC) Response: 2012 IFC added to cover sheet Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 04/21/2017 04/21/2017: FOLLOW UP TO SITE VISIT 04/20/2017 PFA Fire Inspector, Bob Pawlak met on site with the applicant on 4/20/17. The following comments reflect a summary of that discussion. For PFA to approve certificate of occupancy, the applicant is to: > Up -size address numbering on the front of both buildings (317 & 321) and improve identification. > Install Knox Box near front door at address 321 (main office entry). > Verity that dwelling units are individually identified with posted number or letter designator outside every unit. > Post wayfinding wall maps inside both entries (317 & 321) to assist with rapid wayfinding. > Keep a binder at the front desk of 321 with an up-to-date accountability list showing numbers of persons (and ages) occupying each dwelling unit. > Instructions posted on the inside of door (or wall) of each dwelling unit to notify occupant of the street address and unit number should they need to call 911. > Due to a previous conversation with a fire department representative, the applicant is of the opinion that a non -compliant staircase should be abandoned and blocked off. Please be advised that no such action should be taken without the involvement of the city's Building Department and as such, any action would to abandon a stairway would be their decision and NOT a fire department decision. Please contact the Building Department for further on this topic. > The items above (Knox Box, signage, mapping, wayfinding, etc.) may be resolved during permit for tenant finish, if one is to be issued. If no permit is being issued, it will be the applicant's responsibility to contact PFA to schedule a site inspection prior to occupancy. Response: All of above items will be handled / coordinated during building department permit submittal Department: Planning Services Contact: Ryan Mounce, 970-224-6186, rmounce@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 04/14/2017: The round 2 comment letter indicates some bike storage will be provided in an existing shed on site, but the site plan lists no parking. Looking to clarify number/location of potential bike parking. Response: No bike parking will be provided. 01/03/2017: Although there is no bike parking requirement for group homes, what is your experience with families and bike usage? Does it make sense to provide indoor or outdoor bike storage space for residents? Response: Historically for Faith Family bike use has been minimal. FF will address and coordinate as needed with individual residents. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Comment from Clint Wood, Streets, 970-416-2173: Repair existing sidewalk chase and curb to LCUASS standards (NE corner of parcel #2). Response: A note has been added to follow Fort Collins Detail D-10B on Sheet C2.0 Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tiegmund@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: If the applicant anticipates any changes to the existing electric services then electric development and system modification charges may apply. Please contact Light and Power Engineering if changes are anticipated. Response: No changes to Light or Power Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Response: No changes to Light or Power Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Ryan Mounce, 970-224-61869 rmounce@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 01/03/2017: Note from Don Kapperman, Comcast, 970-567-0245: Applicant will need to place 2" conduit from house out to Comcast pedestal for service (see attachment). Response: See Civil drawings for added conduit. Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, ilynxwiler@poudre-fire.orq Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/18/2017 04/18/2017: SPRINKLER SYSTEM Per Assistant Fire Marshal, Joe Jaramillo, any building department permit for Tenant Finish of this space will prompt a separate sprinkler permit review. Please contact Assistant Fire Marshal, Joe Jaramillo with any fire sprinkler related questions at 970-416-2868. Response: Will address during building department permit submittal Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 04/18/2017 04/18/2017: WAYFINDING As previously indicated in prior conversations, a plan shall be submitted to PFA for review and approval prior to FDP approval. 9. Revisit species selections for shrubs, perennials and ornamental grasses and select species more native to Fort Collins ecotypic region and elevations (4000-6000 ft). Many resources area available for plant lists including. - City of Fort Collins Natural Areas Department Native Plants List: http://www.fcgov.com/naturalareas/pdf/nativeplants20l3.pdf City of Fort Collins Plant List: http://www.fcgov.com/forestry/plant—list.pdf Colorado Native Plant Society Suggested Native Plants: https://con ps.org/wp-content/u ploads/2015/05/Suggested- Native- PIants_0408. Pdf Response: Species diversity added to Landscape Drawings. See Sheet A1.2 Department: Historic Preservation Contact: Maren Bzdek, 970-221-6206, mbzdek@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/17/2017 04/17/2017: The properties at 317 and 321 S. Sherwood were evaluated for eligibility for historic designation in January 2015. Both properties were determined not eligible, which means that no further historic preservation review for proposed exterior alterations is required. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/17/2017 04/17/2017: Despite lack of eligibility as individual landmarks, both of the original structures would potentially qualify as contributing buildings to a future historic district if property owners wished to form one. This may be of interest to current or future property owners, as various financial incentives for property maintenance and rehabilitation would be available if that were to occur. To that end, please note that the exterior elevation key notes in the architecture plans outline several items for which historic preservation staff can provide additional information and technical resources, as necessary, in order to maintain the possibility that future financial incentives from the City and State (based on being a contributing building in a historic district) would be available. Retention through repair, versus replacement, of historic building materials is important to consider wherever possible to keep that door open. For example, porch columns should be repaired or replaced with like material (wood) in the same style. Windows should be repaired rather than replaced whenever possible. Power washing should not be used on any historic building materials to avoid damaging wear and tear. Please contact us if there is any need for consultation or professional resources if you have any questions about how to maintain the historic character of the buildings to the maximum extent feasible. Response: Noted. Department: Internal Services Contact: Ryan Mounce, 970-224-6186, rmounce@fcqov.com Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 04/19/2017 04/19/2017: The easement for the proposed fire line should be a "Utility Easement", not a Fire Line Easement. Response: The easement is now being called out as "Utility Easement' not Fire Line Easement Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 04/19/2017 04/19/2017: The minimum driveway width is 12'. Plans indicate the driveway is being widened, but only to 8.6. Please include LCUASS Drawing 706.1 in the Utility Plans. Response: Per Civil Engineer and conversations with City, the driveway is being left as is. This approach has been approved in conversations with the City. Existing width is 7.75' Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 04/19/2017 04/19/2017: Please verify/label that the high point in the alley is higher than the existing flowline in Olive Street. We need to verify that the proposed alley design will drain properly if the alley is completed to the north. Response: The elevation for the alley high point and Olive Street have been labeled on Sheet C3.0 Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 04/19/2017 04/19/2017: A variance request will be needed for the high point in the alley. Standards would require this to be a vertical curve. Engineering understands the constraints and will be in support of this variance. Please include this variance in the General Notes as well. Response: Variance Request will be included in this submittal Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 04/19/2017 04/19/2017: Please remove the thicknesses for the asphalt and aggregate in the cross sections. A final pavement design will be determined from the approved geotechnical report. Response: Thicknesses have been removed from the cross sections on Sheet C5.0 Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: Environmental Planning comments can be addressed and resolved at Final Plan stage (e.g. another round of PDP review not needed for Environmental Planning). Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 04/11/2017 04/11/2017: Please add to species diversity and aesthetic for shrubs. Currently seeing only Little Leaf Mountain Mahogany (C. intricatus) proposed. Perhaps addition of: C. viscidiflorus (Rabbitbrush); S. scopulorum (Rocky Mtn Juniper); Ribes aureum (Golden currant); A. canescens (Four -wing saltbush). Response: Species diversity added to Landscape Drawings. See Sheet A1.2 Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview August 14, 2017 Annette Zacharias FAITH FAMILY HOSPITALITY 300 E OAK ST Fort Collins, CO 80524 RE: Faith Family Hospitality Transitional House, PDP160044, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ryan Mounce, at 970-224-6186 or rmounce@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 04/19/2017: See more redlines. Pease return redlines with next submittal. Response: Redlines corrected. 01/03/2017: Please refer to redlines for various Utility Plan comments and cleanup. Response: Redlines corrected. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/03/2017 04/19/2017: Legals were provided with this submittal, but an application, payment and deed of dedication are still required. See the following link for information about each: http://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php Response: Application & payment and deed of dedication to be handled by client. 01/03/2017: Will the project be proposing to replat the property? This project is responsible for dedicating the required easements needed for this site. A 9' Utility Easement along South Sherwood Street and an 8' Utility Easement along the alley are required. Also, plans show a fire service crossing lot lines. A utility easement is needed for this to occur.