Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE - ANNEXATION & ZONING - 27-96 - MINUTES/NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING� S iT IG��(\THOODtiTrnTI-\LN-nX lT IT GI tiIEETI•r- U for Raw" Project: GcCb 5,aMA mwT ANNakhmOn City of Fort ColMeeting Location: swp swm �.r ` � lins � Date: �I f i(01gG, . C 3 Attendees: Please sign this sheet. The information will be used to - update the project mailing list and confirm attendance at neighborhood I meetings. Contact the Planning Department (221-6750) if you wish to receive minutes of this meeting. Did You Receive Written Notification of this meeting? (Correct L�ddress Name Address Zip Yes I No (Yes I Vol I I _ S-55- iI Cm1- Dr. Fc- VQ)5a S- X S.y �'c.ax y CT �r �' s �s z r I�( I I %e Av, 0 eel. A 664 _ E�aC4 SSE � �o�,,.d- ��d ; r� �'1�� kr�l ; 6SQy %oss: � �res7(✓ .G— �aS�s DC I I � � � Aw U k)f17A)N?__ %SJS f 0(J , (Vet) o✓ I I I qa o-2-ai NEEa.X x Coro (650D F. C. e0525I .n \q a 15. Is this development going to be under the 3 dwelling unit per acre criteria? A. Yes, the applicant has requested a PUD condition on the zoning. The PUD condition would require any development proposal to be submitted as a Planned Unit Development, subject to the requirements of the Land Development Guidance System. One of the requirements of the LDGS is a minimum residential density of 3 dwelling units per acre. 16. What will the maintenance building look like? A. We envision this to be for van storage, lawn mowers, etc. It will have an appearance similar to a residence. It will be very compatible. It will have a great deal of landscaping. 17. As of right now, do you know the elevation of the duplexes? Also, do you know the materials that will be used? A. We envision a combination of brick and vinyl siding. It will not be a traditional lot. There will be common open space between the property line and the back of the duplexes. We will likely provide a berm and landscaping. 18. The entrance on Constellation Drive aligns with my front window. I don't want lights shining in my front window. Also, the kids play right in the street. A. We haven't really studied the access is great detail. We will take your comment into consideration. 2 accesses may really be required. 19. Do you have any fencing plans? A. We haven't thought about a perimeter fence on property yet. 20. What are the chances that the city won't take the annexation? A. I really can't answer that. However, I have been the planner assigned to 2 voluntary annexations and both were approved. 21. You could still develop under county using city standards. A. If we develop in the County, we will be subject to the County Standards. It's better for this to develop under the City's regulations. 22. The city policy says never say NO to developments! You can get more in under the city. No problem to get the City to accept that. 9. There's been a lot of talk on traffic and construction, but that has already been triggered. The city told us there would be 3 lanes after the Trilby Road construction was finished. There are still 2 lanes like there was before. It puts all the traffic on our street. A. Upon contacting the Engineering Department, there appear to be discrepancies between the approved Utility Plans (Striping Plans) and the lane striping that exists in the field. The Engineering Department will be clarifying these discrepancies. 10. When Ridgewood Hills started construction, we were told that traffic would be kept off of Constellation Drive. The City of Fort Collins did not listen to our concerns. A. We commit to take care of our impacts. 11. Could you shed a little more light on this drainage thing? If it drains to the west, will it drain on our site? A. The developed release rate can be no greater than the historic, undeveloped rate. This will required stormwater detention on -site with a controlled release. We would like to release to the west. Releasing to the west will require the applicant to obtain a drainage easement from adjacent property owners. 12. Would there be a pipe underground for water? A. It's not necessary. We (the applicant) will be contacting adjacent property owners to discuss alternatives. 13. We have had a severe sewage problem. In the last 2 years, sewage has backed up into our basement several times. The cause --junk in a man hole caused blockage A. The sanitary sewer runs south then east. We're down stream from your property. However we may need to make necessary adjustments 14. My front door opens directly to the site. So, I'm concerned about what the project looks like. A. The units will be low profile. We have requested a PUD condition on the zoning. We must comply with neighborhood compatibility All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. We feel that your concerns will be adequately addressed through the PUD process. 4. What comprises 1/6th contiguity? A. If you measure the total length of the perimeter of the property. At least 1 /6th of that distance must be directly adjacent to existing City limits. In the case of Good Samaritan, the total perimeter is 3300 feet. 690 of the 3300 feet is directly adjacent to existing City Limits (=21%). 5. Well, that leaves us completely surrounded by the city. That'll force us into the city (increase taxes, increase utility bills, etc.). Access is shown onto Constellation Drive. Constellation Drive wasn't accepted by the County for maintenance and is currently maintained by the homeowners association. On the plan, you have roads onto Constellation. People will go down our street (Constellation Drive) and we pay. I'm looking for compensation. Also, where will the drainage go? What will it do to the value of my house? A. This annexation will not create an enclave and therefore will not force you to annex. The City has an agreement with the County which states that the City will annex all right -of- way which is directly adjacent to the boundary .of the property being annexed. In this instance the City will only annex the Constellation Drive right-of- way from Trilby Road to the north property line of the Good Samaritan, property (approximately 200 feet south of Galaxy Court). A traffic study will be required with the development application. Necessary road improvements will be determined by this study. It's not unusual for a development to make other off site improvements. We tried to provide a good deal of parking. Your second question was related to drainage. A lot of design work will be needed regarding drainage. Constellation does have a drainage problem-- more water than the intersection can handle. We would like to drain to the northwest if possible (must obtain easements). 6. How much construction, how long, and when will you start? A. The project will be phased. If the project is successful in approval, we anticipate starting. in the winter of 1997 or spring of 1998. The first phase will take about 7 months. 7. We were told that there would be no construction traffic on Constellation Drive, but there was. The homeowners have to pay for repairs. A. Good Samaritan will be monitoring construction and streets. 8. If your traffic study shows an increase, will the City take over maintenance of Constellation Drive? A. No. The City will only annex and maintain the right-of-way that is directly adjacent to the property proposed for annexation. (Per Gary Diede). Applicants Presentation: • 1 st need to annex property. • Development plan may not be submitted until annexation is determined. If City does not annex, we will then apply to the County for development approval. • existing 4 story facility on the site. • Overall Development Plan shows proposed development for the next 10 to 20 years. Includes the addition of approximately 40 assisted care duplex residential units, 50 to 60 assisted care apartment units, critical care nursing facilities, physical therapy center, and associated support facilities. • 1 st phase will likely be duplex residential units. • access proposed off of Constellation Drive and Trilby Road. Questions, Concerns, Comments: 1. Is this whole thing pivotal upon the annexation? A. First we must petition the city for the annexation. The property is within the Urban and Growth Area (UGA) and is eligible for annexation since it has 1/6th contiguity to existing City Limits (frontage along Trilby Road). If the City denies the Annexation and Zoning request then we will apply to the County for development approval. The City encourages urban level development to occur within the City limits. No development application has been submitted. All we've done at this point is ask for annexation approval. 2. Is the rest of it (land) going to be annexed now?. A. The Good Samaritan Annexation request consists of approximately 15.2 total acres. This includes all of the Good Samaritan property and the adjacent right-of-way of Constellation Drive from Trilby Road to the north property line of the Good Samaritan property (approximately 200 feet south of Galaxy Court). 3. Will this annexation force Skyview South and Skyview Acres to annex? A. This annexation will not make Skyview South and Skyview Acres an enclave (enclave means county land completely surrounded by City development). If a property is an enclave for at least three years the City could initiate annexation proceedings. Otherwise the Skyview Subdivisions would need to voluntarily petition the City for annexation once they have at least 1/6th contiguity or with some limitation, the City could initiate annexation proceedings if the area to be annexed has more than 2/3 contiguity with the City for a period of at least three years. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES PROJECT: Good Samaritan Annexation, Zoning and Overall Development Plan DATE: October 16, 1996 APPLICANT: The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society CONSULTANT: Ken Merritt Landmark Engineering 3521 West Eisenhower Blvd. Loveland, CO 80537 STAFF: Michael Ludwig, City Planner Staff Presentation: Based upon City Council direction, Annexation and Zoning requests and development applications may not be processed concurrently. The City Council must make its decision on the Annexation and Zoning request before any development applications may be submitted. The following dates are tentatively proposed for the consideration of the Annexation and Zoning request: November 5, 1996 City Council Meeting Resolution Finding Significant Compliance. Consideration of a resolution which states that an Annexation petition was received and is in appropriate form; the property is eligible for annexation under State Law; and sets public hearing schedule for consideration of the annexation and zoning request. November 25, 1996 Planning and Zoning Board Meeting Public Hearing by P&Z regarding a recommendation to the City Council on the Annexation and Zoning request. December 17, 1996 City Council Meeting Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance which would annex and zone the property. January 7, 1997 City Council Meeting Second Reading of an Ordinance which would annex and zone the property. 2