The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDRAKE CROSSING, SAFEWAY FUEL CENTER - PDP - 35-96D - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEWwE s2 Ku5q ELFVATION .CUL ,—/r�.e� o■ A MR. 000 -'iRN C- 0 LAST t_AN WAy11 1.I,t,yAljVn MATERIALS ;CHE.UULE. Q4•cs le ..In sMt—.nut+. ,wn CYV, .Ll [ru .l •141, ,0 .�1:n 4Mt... CYKIYr S.nl Oi INuni, [nt4u w G.,..r. v...n.Lm ,ou. m .aa ws... rna*•.:Iwl n 4•r s <w.a/t✓ n.t..,c ,u ..u. s.n.., was., s•wu .iUR7H 1Al2 )NA`.:1_I�yF VAT1UN MONUMLNI��I(<N- , uiMYl —Q, WL:i?..1�!?.�;ili..C1.CvA..1111N gnu �ilGACt..1Y(.t:�1J 1 l I L.16 y;10 c PL,ram. Division 3.2, Site Plapning and Design Standards Got -to 9�0 V1 IV V �S � G �� i✓ yt rG bt-5 �S . 5 �r SSr �IW Ci .1ps' S ' S `5 (D) Section 3.2.4(C) Area/Activity` Foot-candle Building surrounds (nonresidential) 1.0 Bikeways along roadside Commercial areas Intermediate areas Residential areas 0.9 0.6 0.2 Walkways along roadside Commercial areas Intermediate areas Residential areas 0.9 0.6 0.5 Park walkways 0.5 Pedestrian stairways 0.3 Loading and unloading platforms 5.0 Parking areas 1.0 Playgrounds 5.0 Under -canopy area (average maintained maxunum) 20.0 Under -canopy area (initial installation maximum) 26.0 *Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) Lighting Handbook Design Standards. The lighting plan shall meet the following design standards: (1) Site lighting that may be confused with warning, emergency or traffic signals is prohibited. (2) Background spaces like parking lots shall be illuminated as unobtrusively as possible to meet the functional needs of safe circulation and of protecting people and property. Foreground spaces, such as building entrances and plaza seating areas, shall utilize local lighting that defines the space without glare. (3) Light sources shall be concealed and fully shielded and shall feature sharp cut-off capability so as to minimize up -light, spill - light, glare and unnecessary diffusion on adjacent property. Under -canopy fueling areas shall feature flush -mount, flat lens light fixtures. (4) The style of light standards and fixtures shall be consistent with the style and character of architecture proposed on the site. Poles shall be anodized (or otherwise coated) to minimize glare from the light source. Article 3, Page 43 V 10. This development request will be subject to the current Development Review Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning Department or the Neighborhood and Building Services Department offices. The fees are due at the time of submittal of the required documents for the PDP and Final Compliance Plan phases of development review by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. 11. This development proposal is subject to the requirements as set forth in the City's LUC, specifically Articles 2. Administration (Development Review Procedures), Article 3. General Development Standards, and Article 4. [Zoning] Districts, particularly Division 4.19 - NC, Neighborhood Commercial District. Some specific, very important sections in the LUC relating to this proposed development are: * Section 3.2.1 - Landscaping and Tree Protection * Section 3.2.2 - Access, Circulation and Parking * Section 3.2.4 - Site Lighting ' Section 3.5.1 - Building Standards * Section 3.5.3 - Mixed -Use, Institutional and Commercial Buildings ' Section 4.19(E) - Canopies 12. The City's Current Planning Department will coordinate the development review process. The required submittal package will be submitted to the Neighborhood and Building Services Department, along with the applicable fees, and distributed accordingly to City departments and outside reviewing agencies involved in development review. 13. There are new Transportation Development Review Fees that have gone into effect January 1, 2006. These fees have been approved and adopted by City Council. Please check with Marc Virata of the Engineering Department, at (970)221-6605 or (970)221-6750, for the actual fees that will apply and be assessed with PDP and Final Compliance submittals. Also, these fees will be submitted directly to the Engineering Department. and the shopping center. b. Adequate bicycle parking, in a convenient and secure location, must be provided on -site. C. Direct pedestrian movement between the bus stop on South Taft Hill Road and the shopping center should be accommodated on this site. Please contact David, at (970)416-2643, if you have questions about these comments. 7. Carie Dann of the Poudre Fire Authority (PFA) offered the following comments: a. A minimum 14' clearance between pavement and the bottom of the canopy must be maintained for fire truck movement. b. PFA will want to see cut sheets on the fuel "stuff'. C. There must be a fire hydrant within 300' of the building and it must provide a fire flow of 1,500 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch. d. The address for the buildingwill be from South Taft Hill Road and it must be easily visible from that street. e. PFA will have to see a HAZMATS Study identifying what materials will be used in the facility, how much of these materials will be on -site, and how long they will be kept on -site. Spill control will be required. Please contact Carie, at (970)416-2869, if you have questions about these comments or need more information on the emergency access requirements. f 8. This property is in the NC - Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. The proposed vehicle minor repair, servicing and maintenance facility (car wash) and convenience retail store with fuel salesuses are permitted in the NC District, subject to an administrative (Type 1) reviewand public hearing 9. This development request will be subject to the City's Development Review Process, which is a 2-step process consisting of: * a complete PDP submittal and review, culminating in a public hearing in front of a hearing officer (Type 1, administrative development review); and, * a complete Final Compliance Plan submittal. These plans will be reviewed by City staff and, if determined to be in compliance with approved PDP documents, will be approved and recorded by staff.There is no public hearing associated with the Final Compliance phase of development review. 5 There are new Transportation Development Review Fees that went into effect January 1, 2006. These fees have been approved and adopted by City Council. They will be paid directly to the Engineering Department. Please contact Marc, at (970)221-6605 or (970)221-6750, if you have questions about these comments. 5. Gary Lopez of the Zoning Department offered the following comments: a. The property is in the NC - Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. Based on the information provided at corneptual review the proposed facility is a vehicle minor repair, servicing and maintenance establishment (car wash) and either a gasoline station or convenience retail store with fuel sales, depending on how the building is going to function and what products will be offered. The proposed uses are permitted in the NC District, subject to an administrative (Type 1) review and public hearing b. This new development proposal is subject to the applicable requirements and standards set forth in Section 3.5.1- Building and Project Compatibility of the Land Use Code (LUC). C. This development request would be subject to the requirements and standards set forth in Section 3.5.3 - Mixed -Use, Institutional and Commercial Buildings of the LUC. This section deals with relaionship of buildings to streets, walkways and parking, orientation of buildings to streets and build -to lines, and building character and image. d. This new development proposal is subject to the applicable Land Use and Development Standards set forth in Division 4.19 - Neighborhood Commercial District of the LUC, most specifically Section 4.19(E) Canopies. The canopy must be attached to the building and must have a pitched roof. e. Adequate bicycle parking, in convenient and secure location, must be provided on -site per Section 3.2.2(C)(4) of the LUC f. This property is in the Residential Neighborhood Sign District and is subject to the requirements set forth in Section 3.8.7(E) of the LUC. Please contact Gary, at (970)416-2338, if you have questions about these comments. 6. David Averill of the Transportation Planning Department offered the following comments: a. This development must provide safe, convenient pedestrian movement between the building and the public sidewalk along South Taft Hill Road S e. Spill containment for the fuel pump area is required. There is a standard detail that can be provided in electronic form. Please contact Glen Schlueter, at (970)224-6065, if you have questions about these comments. 4. Marc Virata of the Engineering Department offered the following comments: a. Street oversizing fees will apply to this development, request. The fee for the proposed convenience store with fuel sales and car wash uses will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits. Please check with Matt Baker of the Engineering Department, at (970)224-6108, to verify this fee. b. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS), addressing all modes of transportation, may be required with your Project Development Plan (PDP) submittal. Please contact Eric Bracke of the Traffic Operations Department, at (970)224-6062, and David Averill of the Transportation Planning Department, at (970)416-2643, to determine what information would needed in the TIS pertaining to Level of Service for vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. If the TIS is waived by the Traffic Engineer than maybe just an update letter for the original TIS is needed. C. This request will be subject to aLarimer County Road Impact Fees. d. Any improvements in the public right-of-way will be subject to the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards e. This development will be responsible for the repair or replacement of any damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk on or around the property. f. Easements can be dedicated by separate document if the applicant/developer wants or needs to dedicate any new easements for this project. g. A letter of intent from the property owner to the east, Parcel 2 along South Taft Hill Road, may be needed for any work on that property that may affect this development. h. The standard utility plan documents will be required with the PDP submittal. i. A Development Agreement and a Development Construction Permit may be required for the site improvements. 3 2. Bruce Vogel of the Light & Power Department offered the following comments a. There is an existing electric transformer on the site and there is an electric vault at the corner of this property. b. A C-1 Commercial Form must be filled out to help determine thepower needs for this development. The required detailed plans from the developer that must be provided with the Project Development Plan (PDP) submittal will also help determine the power needs. C. If the existing transformer is to be relocated the cost of relocation will be the responsibility of the property owner/developer. If this is to occur please coordinate the new electric transformer location with Light & Power. d. There will be charges for new entrance capacity. Please contact Bruce, at (970)224-6157, if you have questions about these comments. 3. Glen Schlueter of the Stormwater Utility offered the following comments: a. This site is in the City's Spring Creek Drainage Basin. The new City-wide development fee is $3,070 per acre, which is subject to the runoff coefficient reduction. The fee is to be paid at the time of issuance of a building permit and is charged only if there is an increase in imperviousness greater than 350 square feet. b. If there is an increase in imperviousness greater than 1,000 square feet on -site then the standard drainage and erosion control reports and constructions plans are required and they must be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. A grading plan, but no drainage study, is required when there is between 1,000 and 350 square feet of new imperviousness. There are no requirements for less than 350 square feet. The developer's design engineer will need to canply with the original drainage study for the D:ake Crossing Shopping Center. There is an existing detention pond along the eastside of the site that may need to be modified with this development request. C. On -site detention is required with a 2-year historic release rate for water quantity and extended detention is required forwater qualit treatment. Water quantity detention is required if there is an increase in imperviousness greater than 1,000 square feet. If there is less than 1,000 but more than 350 square feet of new imperviousness then a ste grading plan is all that is required. d. Water qualit extended detention is required with redevelopment of the site to treat the runoff. This may be able to be done by modifying the outlet to the existing detention pond. 2 MEETING DATE: March 6, 2006 ITEM: Safeway Fuel Facility on Tract B of the Drake Crossing Shopping Center APPLICANT: Galloway, Romero & Associates c/o John C. Scales, AIA 5350 DTC Parkway Greenwood Village, CO. 80111-3006 LAND USE DATA: Request for a new Safeway Fuel/Car Wash Facility to replace the existing fuel/car wash facility on Tract B of the Drake Crossing Shopping Center, which is located at the northwest corner of South Taft Hill Road and West Drake Road Tract B is at the southwest corner of South Taft Hill Road and Valley forge Avenue.The property is in the NC — Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. COMMENTS: 1. Roger Buffington of the Water/Wastewater Department offered the following comments: a. There is an existing 8" water main in Valley Forge Avenue and an existing 8" water main in the drive west of this site b. There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main ina north - south alignment in an easement crossing the eastern portion of the site.A minimum 20' wide easement (10' each side) for the sanitary sewer must be provided. C. Any existing services extending into this site must be used by the new development or abandoned at the maim. d. The City's water conservation standards for landscaping and irrigation systems will apply to this new development. e. Plant investment fees and water rights will applyto this new development and they will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits. Credit will be given for existing service accounts to the site. Please contact Roger, at (970)221-6854, if you have questions about these comments. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box580 Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 (970)221-6750 CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT r' Commu+ -_cy Planning and Environmental rvices , Gvll u� ��•. Current Planning l� City of Fort Collins March 9, 2006 Galloway, Romero & Associates c/o John C. Scales, AIA 5350 DTC Parkway Greenwood Village, CO. 80111-3006 Dear John: For your information, attached is a copy of the Staff' s comments for a Safeway Fuel Facility on Tract B of the Drake Crossing Shopping Center, which was reviewed by the Conceptual Review Team on Monday, March 6, 2006. This is a request for a new Safeway Fuel/Car Wash Facility to replace the existing fuel/car wash facility on Tract B of the Drake Crossing Shopping Center, which is located at the northwest corner of South Taft Hill Road and West Drake Road. Tract B is at the. southwest corner of South Taft Hill Road and Valley forge Avenue. The property is in the NC - Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. The comments are informally offered by staff to assist you in preparing the detailed components of a project application. Modifications and additions to these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project. The City' s Current Planning Department coordinates the development review process. I will be the Project Planner for your project. I will be commenting as well as assisting in the coordination process. If you have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6341. Sincerely, A�Da- Steve Olt, City Planner cc: Stormwater Traffic Operations Project File 281 North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 MERCHANDISING SCHEDULE EQLJPMF_N) NU I CJ 1. SLATWALL LAMINATE TO BE FORMICA SW58 SLATWALL TO BE TRIMMED BY ]N' HARDBOARD ALL AROUND (PAINTED WHITE) CONTACT FERGUSONEOUIPMENT.7TIF9]63]D9. VERIFY ACCESSORY OPTIONS WI SAFEWAY REPRESENTATIVE. _. LAMINATE TO BE FORMICA SO655 TO MATCH OTHER MILLWORK. TO OF COUNTER SURFACE SHALL BE •N'. _ _` �� ]. COOLERS AND REMOTE INSTALLEDBYHUSSMAN l SMALL 4. LAMINATE TO BE FORMICA TO MATCH OTHER MRLWORR {OP OF COUNTER SURFACE SNAIL BE •]T. _ C WI SPRING LOADED NINSES AND M-CLEAR WIDTH P1 SATE LATCH (N! CASHIER SIDE Z-0' Zd ).. WI BCRMO LOAOES SIDE AND F VOID FOR I ONE AO"STABLE L/ITCHWI CASHIER SIDE PUM TC)0 6 FACE SAFEIFILIND B- BIIELF ' f CABINET f DRAWER �1 6 � 4 £� '�i a 1 IR' OPENING FOR r-- 1 Q 1 1 MICRO WAVE \ L / ti1 ill IW _ , EIELTRICAL Flo }le / \ I ni ,C\ SANDWICH 2 LASE I ,// \ I :r 4 � I e.-0. ra ve• ❑ DOOR LOW 111 4 F 2A —J — — — 5/1L�9 �1�1 IT ROOM PIN 1L I ALLONUIc I § �� i�l�/JMj/x "° m eEVErucEs I e 000R MIo F lam. // nl ns / / 1 I'-0' 111 ABOVE B SHIER O WORK ROOM 1a IDl lx At o 111 �� }IO e'-e Ilp I 1'Q Y4' 10 4'� I DOOR LOW 1N N ,i ne KIOSK MERCHANDISING PLAN °u'E' v`.r' \ e NORTH III n o c � � c o a 9 O C w U9�h o g R 3 O P O nV R ct W. SA29 W' TMR xam m: MOc art: Mr 2005 RE RWG sA29 c Al 4 a C z ,n W L UN Ql VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL 970)416-2020 April 12, 2006 Mr. Steve Olt Current Planning Division City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Ft. Collins Car Wash Partnership/Safeway Safeway #2913 — Proposed Fuel Fort Collins, CO Dear Mr. Olt, Ft. Collins Car Wash Partnership is the owner of certain real property legally described as Tract B, Drake Crossing Shopping Center and Tract B, Brown Farm Third Filing, located in the City of Fort Collins (the "Property"). Ft. Collins Car Wash Partnership has contracted to sell the Property to Safeway Stores 46, Inc. ("Safeway"). Safeway intends to redevelop the property with a new fuel station and car wash. This letter shall serve to provide Ft. Collins Car Wash Partnership's authorization for Safeway and its representative, Galloway, Romero & Associates, to make all required submittals to the City of Fort Collins for the development of the Property. Thank you. Very truly yours, FT. COLLINS CAR WASH PARTNERSHIP Charles P. Andersen General Partner cc: Linda S. MacDonald LSM:29 t 3 BN113.4/ 12/2006.822:24 AM COMMERCIAL SERVICE INFORMATION FORM (C-1) City of Ft. Collins Electric Utility • 700 Wood St • P.O. Box 580 • FL Collins, CO 80522 (970)221-6700 or fax (970)221-6619 Service voltages available are (not ail voltages are available at all locations): - 1201240 V. 1 phase, 3 wire - 1201208 V. 3 phase, d wire - 120/208 V. 1 phase, 3 wire (network) - 2771480 V. 3 phase, 4 wire - Primary 13,200 V. Grd Y 17620 - 1201240 V. 3 phase, 4 wire (special utility permission required) Any meter exceeding 200 Amps will require CT's. For CT'd meters, Light and Power will provide the meter socket and CT's to the electrical contractor. CT's cannot be placed In the transformer, but may be located in a building mounted cabinet (provided by owner) or In the owner's swltchgear. in no case, can meters be mounted on the transformer. All commercial services must Include the following to be provided and Installed by owner: If CT'd metering, one - V condult from the CT location to the electric meter. For all 3 phase and/or over 200 amp meters, the owner is encouraged to Install a V conduit from the meter socket to the phone room for meter reading purposes. As an alternative, the Utility may install a cellular or other communication system at the meter and add a monthly fee (appx. $40.00) to the electric bill. CVPlease complete the following completely and legibly: Date Submitted: _�/ Voltage Requested: IZO 1Z.oSV C) 1 phase OR 3 phase Building Main (not fuse) Size: iZOO Amps Number of Conduits: Size of Conduits: 4" Number of Cables: Size of Cables:�SO Ker�i r Electric Heat: V Yes Z.-L_kW O No Business Name: ti z VC V --R GTU55i Site Address: - ro � � Owl ers ame: � 6�"(� C Mail Address: I9 AV14U& City: �h State & Zlp: L'o SOZ{ Phone: General Contractor: +-0 �f, A fyvi Le� Individual: _ Mall Address: City: State & ZIP: _ Phone: _ Electrical Contractor-.�("Y� Mail Address: City: State & ZIP: _ Phone: Firm: Number of CT'd meters: I at MOO Amps each Number of Self -Contained meters: at Amps each Largest Motor: — H.P. 1 Phase Z S H.P. 3 Phase Will any generating system (Including photo-voltaics) be installed? ❑ Yes (contact utility for requirements) No If Yes, this will be for: CI emergency service O parallel generation Form Completed by: Name: 7t �t WEGd'� Company: VRlfot�l O QsSociA�eS Mall Address: S�5-6 DTC ParLvj�n City: be / V14 e. State & ZIP: _Ce%ca�— dll I Phone: (303) 3}0. 8B8 `t Transformer Size: Fault Current at Transformer: 1 st 50% - Control 0 A Amps Paid Date: 2nd 50% - Control q Paid Date: 100% ConstdEnerglze - Cont. q Paid; A.T.E. Date: Engineering Approval by: Date: Metering Approval by: Date: WC90N MAt F0XX$\C-L.000'Lv O•c•�a: :i, :004 ann7- b. Complete Construction Drawings with equipment specifications for the fuel system will be submitted at the time of permitting. c. There are three (3) existing fire hydrants within 300' of the building. d. Advisory comment — no action required at this time. e. Please see the attached Hazardous Materials Impact Analysis. 8. Comment noted. 9. Comment noted. 10. The required fees are included with this submittal. 11. Please seethe attached Statement of Planning Objectives. 12. Comment noted. 13. Comment noted. We trust that all of the comments and concerns from the Conceptual Review meeting have been satisfactorily addressed. Sincerely, Galloway, Romero & Associates a Joh C. Scales Enclosures FASAFEWAY\SA2913-Taft & Drake\dWSA2913-jcs-conceptual review responseAoc 3. Stormwater Utility: a. This project results in a 3,163 square foot reduction in imperviousness. b. As mentioned above, this project results in a decrease of impervious area. The existing on -site pond is a retention pond (no outlet). c. See above responses. d. Existing pond is a retention pond (no outlet). e. Spill containment for the fuel pump area will be provided on -site by the existing retention pond. 4. Engineerincl Department: a. Advisory comment — no action required at this time. b. A Transportation Impact Study is included in this submittal. c. Advisory comment — no action required at this time. d. Comment noted. e. Comment noted. f. Comment noted. g. An Authorization Letter from the current property owner has been written. A draft copy of this Authorization Letter is included in this submittal, a signed original has been sent directly to Mr. Steve Olt. h. Comment noted. i. Advisory comment — no action required. j. Required fees are included with this submittal. 5. Zoning Department: a. The proposed retail building is a "convenience store" offering the typical mix of convenience retail items. Self-service beverages (hot and cold) as well as self-service fool items are also offered. Please see the attached Merchandising Plan and Merchandising Schedule for more detail. b. Please see the attached Statement of Planning Objectives. c. Same response as above. d. Same response as above. e. Bicycle parking is provided adjacent to the convenience store. f. Please see the attached Statement of Planning Objectives. 6. Transportation Planning Department: a. A safe, convenient pedestrian route has been provided between the existing grocery store, through this site, to the public walk along South Taft Hill Road. b. Bicycle parking is provided adjacent to the convenience store. c. Please see response 6a. 7. Poudre Fire Authority a. A minimum 16' clearance is proposed between the bottom of the canopy and the drive pavement. FISAFEWA19SA2913-Taft & DrakeWWSA2913-jca onceplual review responseAm Galloway, Romero & Associates Design Engineering Planning 5350 DTC Parkway Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111-3006 (303) 77DM84 (303)770-3636fax E-mail: john_scales@graa.com April 13, 2006 Steve Olt City of Fort Collins Current Planning Department 281 North College Avenue P. O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Re: Safeway Fuel Facility Drake Crossing Shopping Center Fort Collins, CO Response to March 9, 2006 Conceptual Review Comments Dear Mr. Olt: Please accept this formal application for a Project Development Plan for the Safeway Fuel Facility at the above location. The plans included in this submittal have been revised to incorporate comments received from City staff at the March 6, 2006 Conceptual Review meeting. Following are itemized responses corresponding to the Conceptual Review Staff Comment letter dated March 9, 2006, a copy of which is also attached. 1. WaterlWastewater Department: a. Advisory comment — no action required. b. There is an existing easement for the north -south sanitary sewer main (Rec. No. 457762). c. Comment noted. d. Advisory comment — no action required. e. Advisory comment — will be addressed at time of permitting. 2. Light & Power Department: a. Advisory comment — no action required. b. A completed C-1 Commercial Form is enclosed. c. The existing transformer will not be relocated. d. Advisory comment — no action required. F:\SAFEWAV\SA2913-Taft & DrakekdWSA2913-jcs mceptual review respwse.do