Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMULBERRY / LEMAY CROSSINGS PUD, LOT 2, FILING 2 - FINAL PUD - 36-96E - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYMr. Eric Bracke October 4, 1999 City of Fort Collins, , , affic Engineering Page 2 TABLE 1A REVISED TRIP GENERATION ITE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE SIZE COD ADT IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Free -Standing 192 KSF 813 9,016 180 173 353 359 374 733 Discount Superstore Specialty Retail Center 29.6 KSF 814 1,204 0 0 0 33 44 77 Free -Standing 100.45 KSF 815 5,688 66 33 99 213 213 426 Discount Store TOTALS 15,908 246 206 452 605 631 1,236 10 PERCENT REDUCTION 14,317 221 185 407 545 568 1,112 KSF = thousand square feet TABLE 1 ORIGINAL TRIP GENERATION ITE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE SIZE COD ADT IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Free -Standing 272 KSF 813 12,752 254 245 499 508 528 1,036 Discount Superstore Specialty Retail Center 62 KSF 814 2534 0 0 0 175 133 308 High -turnover (Sit- 26 KSF 832 5,338 205 205 410 228 194 422 down) Restaurant TOTALS 20,624 459 450 909 911 855 1,766 10 PERCENT REDUCTION 18,562 413 405 818 820 770 1,589 KSF = thousand square feet Krager and Associates, Inc. 1390 Stuart Street, Carriage House Denver, Colorado 80204-1243 (303) 446-2626 FAX (303) 446-0270 October 4, 1999 Mr. Eric Bracke, Traffic Engineer City of Fort Collins 625 Ninth Street P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-0580 RE: Mulberry and Lemay Crossings - Trip Generation Summary 561 leb2mps Dear Eric: Per your request, Krager and Associates has provided a revised Trip Generation Summary for the above referenced project. The revised summary, Table 1A, details the proposed land uses for Lot 1 and Lot 2. Table 1 A is shown below for your review. The Trip Generation Summary as used in the Traffic Impact Study is also shown below, for comparison purposes. As is shown in the tables, the proposed land uses for Lots 1 and 2 are projected to generate far fewer trips than assumed in the Traffic Impact Study. As a note, the High -turnover, Sit-down restaurants accounted for in Table 1 and the Traffic Impact Study are not included in this submittal. These will be developed at a later date. The projected trip generation from the proposed development plan, as presented in Table 1A, does not exceed the trip generation used in the Traffic Impact Study. In fact, the trip generation is much lower than previously anticipated. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, �J - /" Ann T. Bowers, P.E. Transportation Engineer