Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MULBERRY & LEMAY CROSSINGS, APTS. (BUFFALO RUN) - PRELIMINARY PUD - 36-96A - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS
HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 1 -----'-------- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page ` Center For Microcomputers In Transportation --------------------'__"---- ------ University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 -------""--------------------------------------------- NB SB Ph: (904) 392-0378 Step is RT from Minor Street ------'---'-------------------------------------------___==___------- Streets: (N-S) 12th (E-W) lincoln -------------------`----------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: vph) 202 Major Street Direction.... EW Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1094 Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1094 Analyst ................... mjd Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 Date of Analysis.......... 5/22/97 Other Information ..... ... am Q short range -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- ______-_'______'_______________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 211 Eastbound ; Westbound Northbound 1 Southbound Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1360 L T R 1 L T k L T k L T R Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1360 �___- -_----_____- ___- _--_--__ ---- ---__-_- ---- Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 No, Lanes 0 1< 0 ; 0 > 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 Stop/Yield ; N; N; ; RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Volumes 175 151 5 505 1 10 51 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. PHF .9 .91 .9 .9 .9 .9; of Queue -Free State: 0.99 Grade0 0 0 P -------------------------------------------------------- MC's (%) i 1 i Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB S8 SU/RV's ________________________________________________________ CV's (%) Conflicting Flows: (vph) 770 PCE's :1.10 11.10 '1.10: Potential Capacity: (pcph) 379 ------------------------------------=--------------------------------- Major LT. Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor Adjustment Factors due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 376 Vehicle Critical Follow-up -------------------------------------------------------- Maneuver Gap (tg)Time (tf) ____________________________________________________-_____ -___ Intersection Performance Summary Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Riaht Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Avg. 95% Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) _____ (sec/veh) --------- ________ ______ ______ _____________ NB L 12 376 9.9 _______ 0.0 B 7.7 NB R 7 1094 3.3 0.0 A WB L 7 1360 2.7 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh Y 4 Z HCS: Unsianalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville. FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-5) 12th (E-W) Lincoln Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 5/22/97 Other Information....... am pm short range Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound ; Northbound Southbound p L T R 1 L T R ; L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- - ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 1 1 0 1 ! 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N; N; ; Volumes 410 51 5 165 1 20 51 PHF .9 .9i .9 .9 i. .9 .91 Grade 0 ! 0 0 MC's I SU/RV's (%)! i CV's (%) 1 ' PCE's 11.10 11.10 1.10, -------------------------------------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Maneuver Gap (tg) ---------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.00 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 Follow-up Time (tf) 2 10 2.60 3.30 3.40 HCS: Unsianalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page <' Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------ Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 459 Potential Capacity: (peph) all Movement Capacity: (pcph) 811 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB YEB ---------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 462 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1033 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1033 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (Pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB S8 -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 648 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 446 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (PCPh) -------------------------------------------------------- 443 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LQS Delay Movement (ocph) (pcph) (pcoh)(sec/veh) (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------. -------- ------ ------ ------------- NB L 24 443 8.6 ------- 0.0 B 7.8 NB R 7 811 4.5 0.0 A WS L 7 1033 3.5 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.3 sec/veh e t HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release l.1d Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall eainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 ---------------- Streets: (N-S) access (E-W) lincoln Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mid Date of Analysis.......... 5/22/97 Other Information... ...... am Pm short range Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound I Northbound ; Southbound L T R L T R I L T R L T R ---- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 ; 0 > 0 < 0 1 0 0 0 Stop/Yield ;. N; N; Volumes 185 301 5 510 ; 20 5; PHF ; .9 .9; .9 .9 .9 .9 Grade ; 0 0 I 0 MC's (%) ; I SU/RV's (%); CV's (%) PCE's 11.10 :1.10 1.10: Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Maneuver Gap (tg) ---------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5-00 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 Follow-uo Time (tf) 10 1.60 3.30 3.40 HCS: Unsionalized intersections Release 2.id Pane Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------- Step is RT from Minor Street NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 222 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1069 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1069 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.99 ------------- Step 2 LT from Major Stree{WB E6 -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 139 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1319 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1319 Prop. of Oueue-Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street N8 Sp. ________________________________________________________ Conflicting Flows: (vph) 796 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 366 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Aojusted impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) ________________________________________________________ 365 Intersection Performance Summary Avc. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Oveue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay uencth LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (Pcmh)(sec/veh: (veh) (sec/veh) --------- -------- ------ ----- ------ ------- NE L 24 363 > ------- ----- 427 9.1 0.1 E 9.1 ivc R 7 1069 > w5 - 1319 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = C.3 sec/veh Y HCS: Unsianalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0376 Streets: (N-S) access (E-W) lincoln Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... mjd Date of Analysis.......... 5/22/97 Uther Information........ am pm short range Two-way Stop -controlled In section ' Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R I L T R i---- ---- ----I---- ---- ----I---- ---- --- --- ---- ---- No. Lanes ; 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 p 0 > 0 < 0 ; 0 0 0 Stop/Yield ; N; N: Volumes I 410 10; 5 180 30 51 PMF .9 .9i .9 .9 .9 .9 Grade i 0 0 0 MC's (%) SU/RV's CV's (%) I PCE's I :1.10 ;1.10 1.10; Adjustment Factors vehicle Critical Maneuver Gap (tg) ---------------------------------------------- Left Turn Major Road 5.00 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 Left Turn Miner Road 6.50 Follow-up Time (tf) 2.60 3.30 33.40 HCS: Unsianalized Intersections Release 2.1d Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 462 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 808 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 808 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 ------------------------------------------------------ Step 2: LT from Major Street WB -----------------------------------------------------' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 467 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1027 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1027 Prob. of Oueue-Free State: 0.99 TM Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 99 ------------------0_- Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------NB ----------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 668 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 435 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (PCPh) __________________--_-_---------____----_____--_---__ 43 Intersection Performance Summary Avc. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Rate Cap Cap _`-lay Length L05 Movement (PCpn) (pcph) (ocpn " se -omen) (ven.: ------ ------ ------------ ----- -------- ------ N6 L 36 432 > 467 NB k - 606 > WE L 7 1027 intersection 0.5 se_,ver. EB Sb Approach Delay isec/veh) 8.5 0.1 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 05-22-1997 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4d 05-22-1997 Center For Microcomputers in Transportation Center For Microcomputers In Transportation Streets: (E-W) lincoln (N-S) )emav Streets: (E-W) lincoln (N-S) lemay Analyst: Matt Area Type: Other File Name: 5-22-97 am pm Analyst: Matt Area Type: Other File Name: 5-22-9' am pm Comment: short range _________________________ Comment: short range Eastbound Westbound ' Northbound ; Southbound Eastbound Westbound ; Northbound Southbound L T R L T ----i---- ---- R ; L T R ----i---- -------- I L T ---- ---- ---' R L T k I L T R L T R L T R ice--- ---- No. Lanes 11 1< ; 1 1 1; 1 1 1 1 1< No. Lanes ;-1__ -1-- --_-:-1-- _1__ ---- ---- ---- -1--�1 1 1 ---- ---- ---- 1 1< Volumes 1 25 180 45! 40 125 551 35 320 701 170 565 75 Volumes 60 115 451 110 220 205; 45 590 25; 75 460 30 PHF or PK15;0.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.90;0.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF or PK1510.90 0.90 0.90;0.90 0.90 0.90;0.90 0.90 0.90:0.90 0.90 0.90 Lane W (ft)112.0 12.0 ;12.0 12.0 12.0:12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 Lane W (ft);12.0 12.0 ;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 12.0;12.0 12.0 Grade 0 0 1 0 1 0 Grade 0 0 0 0 % Heavy Veh; 1 2 l; 1 2 1: 1 1 i; 1 1 1 Heavy Veh; 1 2 1� 1 2 1; i 1 1; 1 1 1 Parking i(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N i(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N Parking ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N ;(Y/N) N 1(Y/N) N bus Stops ; 0; 0; 0; 0 Bus Stops 0; 0; 01 0 Con. Peds 1 0; 0; 0; 0 Con. Peds ' 0 Ped button ;(Y/N) Y 14.5 s:(Y/N) Y 11.5 s;(Y/N) Y 14.5 sl(Y/N) Y 11.5 Ped button ;(Y/N) Y 14.5 s;(Y/N) Y 11.5 s:(Y/N) Y 14.5 sl(Y/N) Y 11.5 Arr Type 3 3 3 3 3; 3 3 3; 3 3 Arr Type 3 3 3 's 3; 33 3; 3 3 RTOR Vols ; 0! 0; 0; 0 RTOk Vols 0; 0; 0; 0 Lost Time ;3.00 3.00 3.0013.00 3.00 3.00I3.00 3.00 3.00!3.00 3.00 3.00 Lost Time 13.00 3.00 3.00:3.00 3.00 3.00 ;3.00 3.00 3.00;3.00 3.00 3.00 Prop. Share; I Prop. Share' ; Prop. Prot.; Prop_ Prot.. ; Signal Operations --------------------- ------------------------------------------------ Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 d 1 5 6 7 8 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left * ;NB Left * EB Left * ;Nb Left ' Thru Thru * Tnru ; Thru Right Right * Rignt Right i Pecs Peds Peds Peds WB Left * !SB Left * W6 Left * ;SB Left Tnru Thru * Thru * Thru Right ' Right * Riaht * Right Peds P@ds Peds Reds N6 kiaht 'EB Right NB Right !EB Right SE Right IW6 Right SE night kiaht Green :.BP ` Breen 30.OP Green 20.DP ;Green 3C.0� :Green l el iow/Ak .;_ � � .YellowiAk Len 5.0 ,Mellower:/AR 5.0 Cycle Length: 6C secs ----------- ------_-------------------------------------------------- Phase comoination order: #1 #5 Cyclelle Cycle Length: 60 secs Phase combination #1 order: #i #5 imte^section re-formance Summary ---------------------------------------------------------------------- intersection Performance Summary Lane Grouo: Ac_ Sat Vic 9/C Aooroacn: Lane Group: Adj Sat V/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cat ----- ----------- =lowatip ----- Ratio Delay ----- ----- LOS ire sty --- ----- LOS --- Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS =B L 45=_ l"[4"[ 0.061 0.367 9.4 E 10.6 B ----- ---- ------- EB L 315 ----- 858 0.213 ----- ----- 0.367 10.0 --- ---- B 10.2 -'- B TR 663 1607 0.377 0.367 10.6 6 TR 654 1764 0.272 0.367 10.2 6 WB L 307 838 0.143 0.367 9.7 8 9.8 B WB L 401 1094 0.304 0.367 10.4 E. 10.7 b T 685 1663 0.203 0.367 9.9 6 T 683 1663 0.357 0.367 10.7 B R 586 1599 0.104 0.367 9.5 6 R 586 1599 0.389 0.367 10.9 8 N6 L 125 235 0.311 0.533 6.4 8 6.1 8 T - 1003 1881 0.355 0.533 6.2 6 N@ L 174 327 0.287 0.533 6.1 6 8.4 8 R 655 1599 0.091 0.533 5.2 8 T 1003 1881 0.654 0.533 8.7 6 SB L 367 688. 0.515 0.533 7.9 b 9_5 6 R 853 1599 0.033 0.533 5.i 6 TR - 986 1646 0.721 0.533 9.9 6 SB L 125 235 0.662 0.533 15.9 C 8.6 B intersection Delav = 8.6 sec/veh Intersection LOS = 6 TR 994 1864 0.547 0.533 7.5 b Lost Time/Cycle. L = 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.581 Intersection Delay = 9.3 sec/veh Intersection LOS = B ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Lost Time/Cycle. L = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 6.0 sec Critical v/c(x) = 0.551 APPENDIX A Table 1 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Intersection Lemay/Lincoln (signal) Lincoln/Access (stop sign) NB LT/RT WB LT Lincoln/12th (stop sign) NB LT NB RT WB LT Level of Service AM PM B B B B A A B B A A A A 9 g s N AM / PM 1/1 r--16/8 9/26 — 10127 1/2 1 f r � °-i m � ------------- Buffalo Run y I Site I SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 I Lincol I 1 V Easta PUo I AM / PM — Rounded to the Nearest Ln 5 Vehicles. o L 55/205 L0 -�-- 125/220 40/110 5/10 r- �. 205/.- 20 25/60 � 420/215 -+ 410 �185 - 5�5�510 180/115 --� � 10/30 � � � 4 45/45 --� 6 o� m V "' 7 r 16S 5�75 S/S�S�S Buffalo Run I I Site i .--------^---/ SHORT RANGE TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 4 0, S n qn 5 S, w� o 19/45 155/80 37/39 - '*L- 45/170 - 88/187 pr--19/89 AM / PM wk 1996 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 1 A& TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 2 Based upon review of existing and short range future employment data, a simplified gravity model was used to determine the trip distribution. This trip distribution is shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the assignment of the site generated traffic at the key intersections. Based upon the site plan layout, it was assumed that the center access would accommodate 65 percent of the site generated traffic. The remainder would utilize the 12th Street access. When developments occur to the south, there will be other opportunities for access to Lemay Avenue via 12th Street to Mulberry Street to the south. Background traffic at the Lemay/Lincoln intersection was determined by factoring the 1996 counts by 2.0% per year on Lincoln Avenue and almost 5.0% per year on Lemay Avenue. These factors were obtained from information contained in the "North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan," 1994. Traffic forecasts from two recently approved developments (Kawulok PUD and Lincoln East PUD) were added to the background traffic. Figure 4 shows the background plus site generated peak hour traffic at the key intersections. This reflects a short range (year 2000) condition. Table 1 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix A. The key intersections are expected to operate acceptably. While traffic volumes will not warrant auxiliary lanes, it is expected that widening on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, adjacent to the site, will enable striping of center left -turn lanes at 12th Street and the proposed private access to Lincoln Avenue. The distance from the 12th Street access to Lincoln Avenue is sufficient so as not to cause a queue of vehicles from blocking the proposed access. It is concluded that, in the short range future, the operation at the key intersections will be acceptable with the development and occupancy of Buffalo Run. Other than the improvements required adjacent to the property, no additional geometric or control improvements are required. co MEMORANDUM co LO o CC) CO C) U') TO: Scott McFaddan S 6 Eric Bracke, Fort Collins Traffic Engineer W Planning Department Ted Shepard, Fortes o O {Collins U rn FROM: Matt Delich -;;V ` z LL DATE: May 26, 1997 a Ed SUBJECT: Buffalo Run Traffic Study (File: 9734MEM1) w CD C) N o> This memorandum documents the traffic engineering oT analyses related to development and occupancy of Buffalo Run, an affordable residential complex located in the southeast > = o rn quadrant of the Lemay/Lincoln intersection in Fort Collins. Li The analyses assumed development of this project without the w 0 o proposed power center to the south. A short range analysis N o was requested. The scope of this study was discussed with N staff. N These evaluations used information contained in the "Lincoln East PUD Site Access Study," August 1996. Figure 1 shows the 1996 peak hour traffic count at the Lemay/Lincoln intersection. As documented in the cited study, this intersection operates at level of service B during the peak hours with the existing signal control and geometry. The proposed development will have two accesses to Lincoln Avenue. One is a private driveway, located approximately 850 feet east of Lemay Avenue. The other is a Uj driveway accessing future 12th Street, which is located 1400 a z feet east of Lemay Avenue. The site driveway to 12th Street is approximately 150 feet south of Lincoln Avenue. Twelfth = w Street will also serve development to the south in the future. z As part of future development to the south, access to Buffalo Vz Run also will be provided via a future private road on the J W south edge of the property. This road will be built by other W o developments. Buffalo Run is an affordable residential development o 0. consisting of 144 apartment dwelling units. Using land use z a code 220 from Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE, the following ` s °C F- - trip generation is expected: UJ cs _ Daily - 1000 trip ends U. Morning in - 16 trips H Morning out - 48 trips Q Afternoon in - 45 trips Afternoon out - 26 trips The Buffalo Run Apartments Fort Collins, Colorado CONSTRUCTION AND LEASE UP SCHEDULE 144 Units (1) Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar-97 Apr-97 May-97 June-97 July-97_ Aug-97 Sept-87 Oct-97 Nov.97 Dec-97 UNITS DELIVERED/MONTH: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CUMULATIVE DELIVERED: 0 0 0 0 0 - 0_ 0_ - 0 0 0 0 0 NET UNITS LEASED/MONTH: (a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CUMULATIVE LEASED: 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 -0----- 0 % LEASED: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% - - 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% UNITS OCCP'DIMONTH: (b) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CUMULATIVE OCCUPIED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % OCCUPIED: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% UNITS DELIVERED/MONTH: CUMULATIVE DELIVERED: NET UNITS LEASEDIMONTH: (a) CUMULATIVE LEASED: % LEASED:_ _ NET UNITS OCCPM(MONTH: (b) CUMULATIVE OCCUPIED % OCCUPIED: (1) Construction begins - Jan-98 Feb-98 0 _ 0 0% 0% 0 0 0% . - 0%. Delivered (2) (3) (4) Mar-98 Apr-98 May-98 Jun-98 J" Aug-08 Sep48 _ Oct-98 -- Nov48 24 36 24 36 24 0 0- 24 24 60 84 - 120 144 144 144 144 - 10 - — 20 - 20 30 20 20 20 0 10 30 50 80 100 120 140 140 7% 21 % 35% 56% 69% _83% 97%_ -97%-- -0% 0 0 10 20 20 30 20 20 20 0 0 10 3_0_ 50 -- -35% 80 - - 100 120 140 _ 0% 0% 7% 21 % -- 56% 69916 83% 97% (3) Date of first occupancy (5) Loup complaw TOTAL -- 1997 - 0 ......0 .. _ 0 0% TOTAL DEC-98 1988 144 144 0 140 97% 0 140 97% 140 97% 140 - _ 97% Buffalo Run Apartments Development Phasing Schedule Buffalo Run Apartments Energy Conservation Worksheet Method Two Energy Conservation Measures: 6. The overall U-value for wall is .07 which is less than .2. 1 pt. 7. The overall U-value for the roof is .3 which is less than .6. .3 Pt Total score 1.3 Buffalo Run Apartments Residential Density Chart Buffalo Run Aparti..ents Land Development Guidance System Criteria Anahsis ENGINEERING CRITERIA A-3.1: The site is adjacent to natural gas, electric, water and sanitary sewer facilities with sufficient capacity for this development. Storm drainage on site will follow the existing natural pattern of flow to the east. A-3.2: Water Supply: Yes Sanitary Sewer: Yes Mass Transit: Not applicable Fire Protection: Yes Flood Hazard Areas: Yes Telephone: Yes Walks/Bikeways: Yes Irrigation Companies: Yes Electricity: Yes Natural Gas: Yes Storm Drainage: Yes Cable Television: Yes Streets/Pedestrian: Yes A-3.3: There is a canal which runs to the property currently and it will be vacated as part of this development. A-3.4: Not Applicable. 5 Buffalo Run Apartments Land Decelupment Guidance System Criteria Anahsis A-2.13: The landscape design at the Buffalo Run Apartments has been created to compliment the building, parking and walkway elements and enhance the aesthetic appearance of the project. Landscape plantings will be utilized in a functional manner to achieve the following: • Soften project edges and building architecture. • Screen off -site views into parking areas and trash enclosures. • Provide privacy between living areas and parking areas, living areas and external transportation corridors and between separate living areas. • Provide visual transition from the multifamily land use to the adjacent retail and industrial land use. • Reduce the scale and surface parking areas through the use of landscape islands. Landscape design will emphasize aesthetics in the following manner; • Both evergreen and deciduous trees will be used to provide year around interest while respecting solar access. • Formal street tree planting around the perimeter of the site to establish an urban character along Lincoln Avenue and Lemay Avenue. • Detail planting of small ornamental trees, shrubs and flowers to provide interest and human scale. • Tree spacing and placement to recognize city standards and utility requirements. A- 2.14: The project is within the Residential Neighborhood Sign District. The flushwall signs which will identify the buildings will correspond with signage throughout the remainder of the site. The coloring of the signs will correspond with that of the buildings. Please see enclosed signage elevations. A-2.15: The Buffalo Run Apartments will utilize a combination of low level, intermediate height fixtures for internal street and parking area lighting. Building access areas will be illuminated with residential scale lighting to appropriate demarcation for evening use. The site plan of the project allows for the lighting on site to be focused internally which will not adversely affect surrounding properties. A-2.16: As a residential use. there will be limited noise generated by this development. Any noise would be generated by residents and would be mitigated by the on site property management at the community. A-2.17; Not applicable. A-2.18: Not applicable. 9 Buffalo Run Apantnents Land Deselupment Guidance System Criteria Analysis Secondary: While not private in its design, the secondary system is intended to serve the residents of the Buffalo Run community. Located throughout the interior of the community this system will connect the buildings to the parking areas, recreation areas and the primary system. In the secondary system, bicycles will utilize the asphalt drive areas which connect to bike parking nodes. A-2.5: The site plan does provide adequate access for emergency vehicles and has been designed utilizing the criteria in the LDGS. A-2.6: The secondary pedestrian circulation system has been designed to allow full access within the site and connection to large sidewalks which will run along Lincoln Avenue and Lemay Avenue. Sidewalks are located in areas to allow efficient access between parking and living areas and to safely feed pedestrian traffic from living areas to the recreation amenities. (e.g. clubhouse, tot -lot, and green space in southeast corner.) Sidewalks will be designed to promote safety, but also to be placed in locations which allow landscaping to maximize the attractiveness of the development. A-2.7: The architecture at the Buffalo Run Apartments has been created to interact with the general character of the neighborhood which is generally the eastern portion of downtown Fort Collins. This neighborhood contains a mixture of mostly commercial uses with limited single family north of the property along Lemay Avenue. The project will address consistency with the commercial uses by incorporating period architectural features such as red brick in the clubhouse building. The clubhouse is the most visible point in the project and will transition the project to the downtown area's architecture. The project scale has been designed to blend with the residential uses north of the site on Lemay Avenue. The buildings along Lemay Avenue will be one and two stones in height and are compact in width so as to resemble a single family structure. The building forms and materials are intentionally composed to reinforce traditional, historic character. In addition, there will be a transition from one and two stories along Lemay Avenue to three stories in the eastern side of the development which will provide vertical relief as one moves from east to west along Lincoln Avenue. A-2.8: The buildings will exceed 40' in height at some locations but average much less than 40' overall. The architecture of the buildings allows variable roof lines of different heights. The maximum height for any building is '42, but that is only on the highest roof areas which typically is only 30% to 40% of the total area. A-2.9: The buildings in this project will not cast a shadow on other surrounding buildings. The tallest buildings at this community are over 200 feet from any other buildings to the north and consequently any shadow created by those buildings will not affect other property. A-2.10: Should solar energy systems become feasible, the layout of the building will allow the use of solar energy systems. A-2.11: Not applicable. 9 Buffalo Run Apartt.,ents Land Development Guidance System Criteria Anahsis A-1.12: The overall average residential density for the project is 17 units per acre. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILTY CRITERIA A-2.1: The Buffalo Run Apartments will promote multimodal transportation within the City of Fort Collins by locating a residential land use near employment and services which will intent residents to use alternative methods to vehicular transportation. In addition, the development will incorporate facilities such as easy access to the Poudre River Trail and bike racks within the development to make it easier for residents to utilize the existing Fort Collins multimodal transportation system. A detailed vehicular transportation analysis has been prepared by Krager and Associates Inc. In general, the site is located at the intersection of two arterial streets which have sufficient capacity for the vehicular traffic generated by the development. Pedestrian transportation needs are addressed within the development by an extensive internal sidewalk system (the "secondary system" as described in Section 2.4) which connects to the "primary system" along South Lemay Avenue and Lincoln Avenue. The secondary system will also connect to the internal commercial development adjacent to the south at two locations. These connections will provide residents access to the Poudre River Trail at the intersection of South Lemay Avenue and Mulberry Street. Handicap access to the sidewalk along Lincoln Avenue and to the retail project to the south will also be provided. Bicycle transportation will utilize the internal driveways within the community and then access to the bicycle lane on the eastern boundary of Lemay Avenue to connect to the Poudre River Trail. The site will also incorporate multiple bicycle parking areas. A-2.2: The surrounding uses for the this property are: retail to the south, industrial to the east.. retail and industrial and some residential to the north and retail and a golf course to the west. Consequently, the character of this neighborhood is difficult to describe as it includes a such broad mixture of uses. However, the commercial project to the south will provide an opportunity to utilize complimentary design features as further described in Section 2.7. A-2.3: The site is currently utilized for agriculture and is very flat. The development will improve the appearance of the site by incorporating topographic features into its landscape design. A-2.47he Buffalo Run Apartments pedestrian circulation hierarchy will have two classifications: Primary and Secondary; Primary: This system will construct large sidewalks along Lincoln Avenue and South Lemay Avenue and serve the general public as well as Buffalo Run residents. The primary system has been designed to provide linkages to the surrounding community Buffalo Run Aparitilents Land Decclopment Guidance System Criteria .4nahsis COMMUNITY WIDE CRITERIA A-1.1: Not Applicable A-1.2: Yes, please see enclosed analysis of project's compliance with The City of Fort Collins Land Use Policies. A-1.3: Not Applicable A-1.4: Not Applicable A-1.5: Not Applicable A-1.6: Not Applicable A-1.T The buildings can accommodate rooftop solar energy collectors. A-1.8: The project will not generate any gaseous, liquid or solid pollution. A-1.9: The project will conform to all state, local and federal water quality standards. Runoff from this development will be minimal and will be retained on site in a single large storm water retention area. A-1.10: The development will utilize the City of Fort Collins sanitary sewer system. There will be no industrial waste generated by the development. A-1.11:The landscape plan for The Buffalo Run Apartments has been designed to incorporate the following water conservation criteria: • Plant material selections will emphasize the use of native or adapted species with proven draught tolerance. Plants with similar water and exposure requirements will be grouped together and irrigated on the same zone to facilitate water conservation. • Shrubs will be planted in mulched beds and irrigated with separate zones than turf areas in response to lower water requirements and different irrigation intervals. Irrigation design to provide rotor heads for large areas and spray heads for smaller irregular areas. Drip irrigation will be utilized for shrub beds next to building foundations. • The irrigation plan will be prepared by a certified professional familiar with equipment specifications and a working knowledge of local irrigation practices and conditions. Buffalo Run Apartments Overall Development Review Criteria Chart Land Development Guidance System Criteria Analysis Buffalo Run Apartments Statement of Land Use Policies Achieved by Planned Unit Development 12. Urban density residential development usually at three units or more units per acre should be encouraged in the urban growth area. The Buffalo Run Apartments density will be 17 units per acre in a location already served by utilities and adjacent to complementary commercial and industrial land uses. 22. Preferential consideration should be given to urban development proposals which are contiguous to existing development within the city limits or consistent with the phasing plan for the urban growth area. The Buffalo Run Apartments is located on an infill parcel within the urban growth area. 39. The City should direct efforts to promote improved traffic and pedestrian circulation and public transit areas north and northeast of the City. 41. The City should encourage residential development in the northeast, particularly giving special consideration to the undeveloped industrially zoned land in the area adjacent to the existing residential neighborhoods. The Buffalo Run Apartments are located in the northeast quadrant of the City of Fort Collins and is adjacent to the industrial corridors along Lincoln Avenue. 49. The City's Land Use Policies Plan shall be directed toward minimizing the use of private automobiles and toward alleviating and mitigating the air quality impacts of concentrated use of automobiles. The Buffalo Run Apartments are located adjacent to service and employment centers which will reduce the traffic generated by the development by allowing multimodal transportation options. 80. Higher Density residential uses should locate: a. Near the core area, regional/community shopping centers, CSU main campus, or the hospital; The Buffalo Run Apartments are located next to a site which has Overall Development Plan Approval for a regional shopping center and is approximately 2 miles north of the hospital. b. Within close proximity to community and neighborhood park facilities; The project is'/, mile to the east of the c. Where water and sewer facilities can be adequately provided; Water and sanitary sewer facilities are located along both Lincoln Avenue and Lemay Avenue. d. Within easy access to major employment centers; The Buffalo Run Apartments are 1 mile west of the Fort Collins downtown area and is immediately adjacent to the west of the Lincoln Avenue industrial corridor e. With access to public transportation; The site is not on current Transfort bus routes, however the commercial center to the south will likely provide a bus service shelter for future expansion of the system to the site. Buffalo Run Apartments Statement of Planning Objectives Summary a. Please see enclosed Land Use Policy Analysis b. The site will be owned by the applicant upon completion of the development review process with only the right of way for 12`' Street to be owned by City upon that street's dedication. c. The multifamily community will provide five full time jobs. Two full time and one part time employee will be in the property management functions and two full time and one part time employee will be in the property maintenance function. d. The Buffalo Run Apartments were conceived to correspond with the Land Use Policies in the City of Fort Collins. The applicant investigated numerous locations for this type of project throughout the city and was drawn to this site for its availability of utilities and location near two major employment centers and services. The community's affordable component with 86 units deed restricted to residents making no more than 50% of the area median income will provide a unique housing opportunity in this area of Fort Collins. See enclosed analysis of Land Development Guidance System criteria. e. See enclosed residential density chart and overall development criteria chart. The high density residential use is the less intense use of the surrounding existing and proposed uses. The land to the north and east is or will be industrial. The development is mitigating impacts from those uses with significant setbacks and landscaping along the northern property boundary and locating a .25 acre retention pond on the eastern portion of the property closest to the existing industrial use. The western boundary of the property, we believe, offers an amenity to the Buffalo Run Apartments with the Link-n-Greens golf course providing views of open green space and the mountains to the west. The commercial use to the south will be mitigated by this development primarily with the different elevations between the two properties. The commercial center is proposed at an elevation c;er 4 feet above the grade of the Buffalo Run Apartments which will provide a strong visual and noise barrier between these two uses. g. See enclosed energy conservation worksheet. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE BUFFALO RUN APARTMENTS 0 ENSITY CHART contin ed Criterion Earned Credit E If the site or adjacent property contains a historic building or place, a bonus may be earned for the following: 3% For preventing or mitigating outside influences adverse to its preservation (e.g. environmental, land use, aesthetic, economic and social factors); 3% For assuring that new structures will be in keeping with the character of the building or place, while avoiding total units; H 3% For proposing adaptive use of the building or place that will lead to its continuance, preservation, and improvement in an appropriate mama. Z t If a portion or all of the required parking in the multiple family project is provided underground, within the 0 O building, or in an elevated parking structure as an accessory use to the primary structure, a bonus may be earned as go follows: 9% For providing 75% or more of the parking in a structure; 6% For providing 50 - 74% of the parking in a structure; 3% For providing 25 - 49% of the parking in a structure. V If a commitment is being made to provide approved automatic fire extinguishing systems for the dwelling units, enter a bonus of 10%. V If the applicant commits to providing adequate, safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle connections between the project and any of the desination points described below, calculate the bonus as follows: 5% For connecting to the nearest existing City sidewalk and bicycle path/lane; 5% For connecting to any existing public school, park and transit stop within the distances as defined in this Density Chart; 5% For connecting to an existing City bicycle trail which is adjacent to or traverses the project. TOTAL SOS Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised September 1994 -79a- Q U rj�;cG O 4 vnl Poe ELiri,.✓� y P v. Criterion 2000 feet of an existing neighborhood shopping center, or a---------------------- ------------------ 2000 feet of an approved, but not constructed neighborhood shopping center. b 650 feet of an existing transit stop (applicable only to projects having a density of at least six [6] dwelling units per acre on a gross acreage basis) C 4000 feet of an existing or approved regional shopping center 3500 feet of an existing neighborhood_ or community _park; or _ _ d 3500 feet of a publicly owned but not developed neighborhood or community park or community W facility (except golf courses); or Vi 3500 feet of a publicly owned golf course, whether developed of not — — — — — — — — — — — mE 250 feet of an existing school, meeting all requirements of the State of Colorado compulsory education Credit 10% 20% 10% --_ 10% f 3000 feet of a major employment center 20% CIO 1000 feet of a child care center 5% h "North" Fort Collins 20% d O 1 The Central Business District 20% J A project whose boundary is contiguous to existing urban development Credit may be earned as follows: 3090 ert boon has 0- con ta whose ormovemnivoan - 20% co -d ' 's 15 - 20% For projects whose property boundary has con gu ty; 20 - 25% For projects whose property boundary has 30 - 40% contiguity; 25 - 30% For projects whose property boundary has 40 - SO% contiguity. k If it can be demonstrated that the project will reduce non-renewable energy usage either through the application of alternative energy systems or through committed energy conservation measures beyond those normally required by City Code, a 5% bonus may be earned for every 5% reduction in energy use. Calculate a 1% bonus for every 50 acres included in the project M Calculate the percentage of the total acres in the project that are devoted to recreational use. Enter 1/2 of that S percentage as a bonus. 30 lei S 'S a .8 S I►e : t 0 % n F Ta-M t. tl If the applicant commits to preserving permanent off -site open space that meets the City's minimum requirements, calculate the percentage of this open space acreage to the total development acreage and enter this percentage as a bonus. If part of the total development budget is to be spent on neighborhood public transit facilities which are not otherwise required by City Code, enter a 2% bonus for every $100 per dwelling unit invested. If part of the total development budget is to be spent on neighborhood facilities and services which are not otherwise H P required by City Code, enter a 1 % bonus for every $100 per dwelling unit invested. z z q If a commitment is being made to develop a specified percentage of the total number of dwelling units for low O income families, enter that percentage as a bonus, up to a maximum of 30%. 0 If a commitment is being made to develop a specified percentage of the total number of dwelling units for Type "A" go and Type "B" handicapped housing as defined by the City of Fort Collins, calculate the bonus as follows: Type "A" .5 xTym'!A" Units IN Units Type "B" 1.0 x Tv'r "R" Urrirc In no case shall the combined bonus be greater than 30% Total Units Continued Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised September 1994 -79- 8 r". ATTACHMENT "B". ACTIVITY; Residential Uses DEFINITION; All residential uses. Uses include single family attached dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public recreational uses as a principal use; uses providing meeting places and places for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers. CRITERIA; The following applicable criterion must be answered "yes" and implemented within the development plan. Yet No 1. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE �VIl�1UM PERCENTAGE � POINTS AS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT? The required earned credit for a residential project shall be based on the following: 60 percentage points = 6 or fewer dwelling units per acre 60 - 70 percentage points = 6 - 7 dwelling units per acre 70 - 80 percentage points = 7 - 8 dwelling units per acre 80 - 90 percentage points = 8 - 9 dwelling -units per acre 90-100 percentage points, = 9-10 dwellin¢ units ner acre Lana Levetopment Uuidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised August 1994 N/A -78- G fJPr;k s4Gd Pf #. j 02�r/ iMi _/ � .e V Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY Is applicable? CRITERION a` the criterion Will the criterio be satisfled7 If no, please explain g ir g Yes No Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA 1.1 Solar Orientation 1.2 Comprehensive Plan 1.3 Wildlife Habitat / 1.4 Mineral Deposit ✓ 1_5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas reserved reserved Te Lands of Agricultural Importance 1.7 Energy Conservation 1.8 Air Quality 1.9 Water Qualitv ✓ 1 1 1 ✓ 1 1.10 Sewage and Wastes ✓ 1.11 Water Conservation Ar Fimo 1.12 Residential Density,/ ✓ A 2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA 2.1 Vehicular. Pedestrian. Bike Transoortation I ✓ ( ✓ 2.2 Buildina Placement and Orientation ✓ ✓ 2.3 Natural Features 2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parking ✓ ✓ 2.5 Emergency Access _ 2.6 Pedestrian Circulation ✓ 2.7 Architecture or of 2.8 Building Height and Views 2.9 Shading 2.10 Solar Access ✓ ,/ 2.11 Historic Resources J 2.12 Setbacks 2.13 Landscape 2.14 Sians f 2.15 Site Lighting ✓ �E►'/fWEb T P.Nnc 2.16 Noise and Vibration ✓ I/ 2.17 Glare or Heat we 2.18 Hazardous Materials ✓ A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity ✓ ✓ 3.2 Design Standards 3.3 Water Hazards / 3.4 Geologic Hazards _ Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised VAZa 199/4�,, -61-lam US� Proposal: Description: -Density: General Population: SCHOOL PROJECTIONS #36-96A Buffalo Run Aparments PUD Preliminary 144 multi -family residential units on 8.58 acres. 16.78du/ac (gross) 144 (multi -family units) x 2.8*(persons/unit) = 403 School Age Population: Elementary: 144 (units) x .104 (pupils/unit) = 15 Junior High: 144 (units) x .050 (pupils/unit) = 7 Senior High: 144 (units) x .046 (pupils/unit) = 7 TOTAL = 29 *Figures are calculated on 2 and 3 bedroom multi -family residential units. -+c 1 � 1' _ , _•..fir 1 r jg 1 ^itS+- �Ki ty'I�i at IF : ' i �: xn ror 1[ Ai ` s ig rf j �fgYWjl�yiy.uJ'� 'w t SIB 46 :_ so .:.:,�'• - _ - \ � �4•r.. ,sTy.eSByT��' rL'.�fi�2y°'v' .i..2':d-"E"'�„5 tv �Q tir � µ n �� � Yp r a' � T mob• �,Y sN-14� �r�,i rASirr,�,R'' '. T*'tq�a"gtiYY_ `` ��'n Lx r' F �`7�.�' - �'�•�'i= ".� •t ^- , i `�•""�'Sr.r�li� - ��".:.-,.i'"��'„�"�"at�..�r r ' � ai 1,� �� +x�',+M "' ,. r r.�ic;K +r M �.! .dam �-' a�q...� _.� •,. , x ..,,, ,+;.. ' .-, +' �•:� ,,,�_-'�M - v;NP No Text BUFFALO RUN APARTMENTS P.U.D. SUBMITTAL CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO DATE: MARCH 27, 1997 REV.: JUNE 3, 1997 A DEVELOPMENT BY: THE BRISBEN COMPANIES 1� 091 INDEPENDENCE STREET SUITE 149 I WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO BW33 3- (303) A29B61 1 ARCHITECTURE BY: COLE & RUSSELL 2365 VICTORY PARKWAY, SATE 200 ONCMNATI. Oft 452M ; V 6' WALK (513) eel-22n I_ _ ENGINEERING BY: THE SEAR -BROWN GROUP 209 SOUTH MELOLMI EMT COLPIS. CWORAOO W21 (970) A62-%22 LAND PLANNING BY: OHM DESIGN CORPORATION \ ACTIVE AM 1•' ' 'NO LAWRENCE STREET, SOTE TOO'- \\ DENVER. MORADO 50204 N (303) 692-m \ \\ � 1 � SIDEWALK �\ y n UNK-N-GREENS GOLF cWRISE _SIDCw�✓ f- SIDEWALK \ anc T UNDEVELOPED GENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ONLY �P Dc,NTURE NL SPA MOG 2 ELM 3 B' WALK + • +''__ID &CHACE PER L ` CITY CODE 1 � I ,f I'I• T I 1 TYPICAL UNIT FOUNDATION I I 1L PROPOSED RETAL A SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE I h' PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE MIN AM SPECIFICATIONS FOR NUMBER ONE GRACE. 2. ALL TURF AND SHRUB AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH A PCP -UP ANDIOR DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM. THE IRRIGATION! SYSTEM IS TO BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THE WATER REOUREMENTS OF THE INOIAWAL PLANT MATERIAL 3. THE RRIGATION SYSTEM SMALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WIN THE WATER CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR LANDSCAPING AND IRWGARON SYSTEMS. Y. ALL SHRUB BEDS SMALL BE MULCHED MTH A WOOD FIBER PRODUCT TO A AVERAGE DFPTH OF 3'. 5. ALL TREES MALL BE SM OR CONTAINERIZED. B. EDGING BETM:EN TURF AND SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE 1/3-W STEEL EDGING SET LEVEL WIN TOP OF SOD. 7. MINOR CMANOS IN PLANT SPECIES AND LOCATION MAY BE MADE DURING CONSTRUCTOR AS REWIRED BY SlE CONDITIONS OVERALL DUALITY AND WAMTY OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH APPROVED P.U.D. PLANS. BLOC. A FUTURE (Fro 1 LEGEND • POLE MOUNTED SITE LIGHT R. ACCESSIBILITY RAMP H/C HANDICAP PARKING SPACE T. TRASH ENCLOSURE B. BICYCLE PARKING c ID SIGNAGE PROPOSED CANOPY TREE PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE PER PROPOSED SHRUB BEDS 9 S. ALL MEES SHALL BE KEPT 10' CLEAR FROM WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES, AND 4 CLEAR FROM GAS LINES. 9. THE DEVELOPER MALL ENSURE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS COORDINATED WIN THE PLANS OF OTHER CONSULTANTS SO THE PROPOSED GRADING. SIDON ORANACE, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTMTES DO NOT CONFLICT Oft PRECLUDE THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE O ALL LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 1O SCA SMALL BE AMENDED PER THE SOIL TESTWG RESULTS 11. PLANT UST AND OTHER LANDSCAPE DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH THE FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS. 12. ALL ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS AND GAS METERS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC MEW, 13. ALL BICYCLE RACKS SMALL BE PERMANENTLY ANCHORED TO CONCRETE AND NOT INTERFERE WIN PEOESTRIAN WALKWAYS. IA. ALL TRASH ENCLOSURES SHALL BE PLACED ON CONCRETE AND SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED O MATERIALS TO MATCH THE BUILDRNGS. ALL ENCLOSURES SHALL INCLUDE AN AREA FOR RECYC.A E COMTMMER5 AND FEATURE A SWO SWINGING GATE. 0 25 SO IOD NORTH SCALE I'.50' SHEET 2 OF 2 BUFFALO RUN APARTMENTS P.U.D. SUBMITTAL CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO DATE: MARCH 27, 1997 REV.: JUNE 3. 1997 A DEVELOPMENT BY: THE BRISSEN COMPANIES '� I MI INDEPENDENCE SNEEI SUITE 149 I MEAT RIDGE. CaMADO 60033 (303) 423-95B1 ARCHITECTURE BY: DOLE k RUSSELL 2368 NCTCWY PARKWAY. WIM 2W CWCINNAR, qM0 452% (513) WI-2277 ENGINEERING BY: THE SEAR —BROWN GROUP 2W SWT1 NEIIMUY FORT 00LONS, COLORADO W521 (970) 462-5922 LAND PLANNING BY: OHM DESIGN CORPORATION IM URRENQ STREET, SUITE IW DENYFR. C0.tlRAW WAMI (303) 892-5566 SroEwNx SLOG \ I \ \ Im \ .CiIV ,AREA.1 \ O \ Cn; \ I T � 1 I yc�H MNK-N-IAEERS\ Wlf CCUSSE STD —WALK\ L\` 1 1 TYPICAL UNIT FOUNDATION 1 SHRUB PLANTING I NOT 70 SCALE 1 I — — � � UNDEKLCPEO GENCY VEMC E ACCESS CH Y PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES I. ALL PLANT MAMMAL SMALL BE W ACCpmµCE MM Aµ SPEDICAPC:S EON NUMBER IX GRACE. 2 ALL %IIF AND SXRMR AREAS 91ALL BE PMOAMO MM A P ,l AND/d DRIP IRMGATW SYSTEM. THE RNIGATM SYSTEM IS TO 6E ADJUSTED TO MEET THE WARM REWWEMERIS CP THE NEI Wµ PLµT YATEThAL i ME RM NIN SYSTEM SHALL W W CCMWANLE ON TIE WAMR CORSERVATCN STAMDA,S FM lAM)SCMNG µ0 IMMMAMW SYSTEMS. 4. ALL 9RUS MD5 SHALL BE WLCHEO MM A OXO M. PROWCT TO A AVERAGE CEPTH 5. ALL TREES SMALL BE W CO CCMTAlHEPo2E0. S. EOGINO BETKEN N" µD SHRUB BEDS 91µ1 BE 1/3-W STEEL EDGMC SET LE\EL MM TW W SW. 7, MNC R CNµMS W PLANT SPEOES MA LWA1N]N MAY W YAOE OYMNG CONSIFVCTIXI AS IEWREO BY 97 CMLYT1piS OVERALL WNJTY IJq WMIEY CI` RANT MAMMAL SHALL BE CRIgSMNT RM APPROVED P.U.O. BANS fgsT A W ALL IMMS SHNL BE KEPT IV CIEµ E WATER AMC SANTARY Y11ER LINES, ANO A' OEµ N,N GAS LIMES. 9. TIE CE\41CPER SMALL EM91NE THAT TIE LANDSCAPE MN IS CNRp1AMID ON C E P .S CP OTER C SIXTAATS SO THE PROPOSED (RADWG. STORY ORAWAQ. ND OTKR LYMSTN1C11pN AC1 AWS W NOT COKLCT . pREDLOE TE IMSI..1M A.W uAIry TENnIKi 6 ALL LANDSCAPE REMENTS IO SAL SHALL W AYENCED FER TE SCRL TESTING RESULTS. 11_ PLANT LIST AND ORER LAMCSCAPE MATS SHALL W FRONDED MIX TIE FRAL C,ASTRU,NA gAMS 12 ALL MCTMCA 1MAMgORNERS AND CAS METER$ SLA, BE SCREENED NCO, PMBUC MEW 11 ALL MCYCLE RACKS $HALL W PERMANENTLY .WOICgEO TO WNCRETE .WO WT WMMM E MM PFDESTMµ WN WAM 14. ALL TRASH ENCLONIB:S SHALL W RACED ON CMCRETE Alq SI41 BE CPHSTFWED OF MAMMALS TO PATCH THE 13UUX i ALL ENCLOSURES SHH WCLIXIE µ AREA FM RECYCLABLE CpHIAWERS AMC iEAN A SCUD WNGING CATE, LEGEND • POLE MOUNTED SITE LIGHT R. ACCESSIBILITY RAMP H/C HANDICAP PARKING SPACE T. TRASH ENCLOSURE B. BCYCLE PARKING ID SMNAGE OPROPOSED CANOPY TREE PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE PROPOSED SHRUB BEDS WALK (TIP.) 0 25 50 1W NORM SCALE 1'.5V SHEET 2 OF 2 BUFFALO RUN APARTMENTS P.U.D. SUBMITTAL CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO DATE: MARCH 27. 1997 REV. .NNE 3. 1997 A DEVELOPMENT BY THE BRISBEN COMPANIES \ 48111 INDEPENDENCE STREET SATE P19 J WHEAT RIDGE. COLOLADO 80OJJ (b3) 42J-958T \, ARCHITECTURE BY: C 6 WAIX COIF h SELL 23e6 my Pe"o PARWWAr. 51ATE 2aO �\ NATI. O 15206 (5t J) 861-22i) (513)CINCII- 277 \ CLUBHOUSE - ENGINEERING BY: THE SEAR -BROWN GROUP 209 SOL, MELORW � FORTCOLLINS, C0.0RAD0 50521 \\ \ \ (970 2- FOOD) 22 bx LAND PLANNING BY: OHM DESIGN CORPORATION \ iGrWiMar AREA 13KuwExu STITEET, ARTE too DEN DENIER, C0.OtADO BD201 \ '\ \ I Y l \ UNK-N-GREENS\ GOLF COURSE \ VICINITY MAP © \ NOT TO SCALE \ NORTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 A M=t 9f 11nA RCe1M W Me S HIhhot Wader o1 Sect— 7. TownWip 1 7 North. Time* 69 Wnt of the 6M Princyt/ Nwi6m, Cd, of F. ".I, 1 C hl=f_LmunW, $tote of Goof". olng nt" Partioutor" Ceav;eU Coh=m g Na Souq IFe 9f the $ Mwt pieta of saki Section 7 rroJ Int5w North 891 W Eml onfi with a bmrin9a [mteine0 9neF 1 1 I The .. rWW trod o1 lea —'..ee.Ya 4 .*, to a rII..of.... new _ an G me.bNn¢ — UNDEVELOPEO I Cy \E10CLE ACCESS ONLY _ PROPOSED FUTURE -04 e BLDG. 3 \ 1 1�11RE ACCESS 6' WALK 1 \--10 SIGNAGE PER Y CITY GCOE 11 1 1 9 PROPOSED RETAIL A I a I 1 SITE PLAN TABULAR DATA BLDG. 4 WMMJN •Qt]Y AW �Off ARN S OE A 1311[ 70TK .`I✓<T MG W4. '. 'K! ARFA ACTWACE R t TOTAL • BURRING A.143 W. R. 1.V AC. 14% 5J,143 50, IT 1.22 AC. 17% GoxRAGE W PARKING AHD 81,.,OD SO. FT. 1.87 AC. 2n 8f,50o W. FT, I.87 AC 25X GROWS • LAN854APE Me" UL FlL 5.M AC. Ht 188.572 W. R. 4M M. y{ TOTAL STE 3 082 W. FT. 1145 AC. 1001L 323.215 W. R. 7.42 AC, 1001f AREA • CROS5 AREAS A MI TO INE WIfRENT PROPERTY LINE ., NET AREAS EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF E LWCON AVE., S, LEMAY AVE., AND 12111 ST BUILDING TYPES T19E , >� TPE 2 lY iYPE 3 � TYPE 4.. LEGEND -ID RGNAGE PER R ACCESSIBILITY RAMP CITY CODE H/C HANDICAP PARKING SPAN IRATP3 AT N 1. TO. my pars To I. oocOf, \ T. TRASH ENCLOSURE E BICYCLE PARKING E` 0 10 &MACE E POLE MOUNTED SITE LIGHT BLDG. 6 BLDG. 6 BLOQ 7 6' WALK (TYP.) I (V� Q I `� DEIENTON/Acme A li AREA E �¢ n7W ss s. III FUTURE ACCESS N I o (IYP.) Im II N f I SITE DATA • ENSTNC ZCAIN C-COYIEROµ olo"IMENT DATA PARKMG DATA: • &RdNG W. FT. 14ZM M fT • ]RR. UNITS 64 •STANDARD WAGES N4 • STREET R.O.W. 45,302 S IT •3BR. UNITS 80 •HANDCAR SPACES a W RESDENTIAL NNSTY 18.26 om./AC. .IOTµ NWBER OF UNITS IH •TOTµ pARKING 272 • MALYVM BNIDING HUGHT 4G AT EKWKD NUMBER OF SPAIX • 51%M QNENIED UN15 IB Loan(i1Z) PARKING SPACES 272 SPACES • W1 YING AREA FOR CTIVE RECREATKIN AMA &F. SHEET 3 OF 2 OUT 1• Propo"d LLLincoln E..t PUD O U -N-G ens If Co r.e SITE CCR O W Z W Q Q LU W J ;MULBERRY ST 1HWY 14) O L •, v Do0 Ea a VICINITY MAP #36-96A Buffalo Run Apartments P.U.D. " Preliminary (LDGS) 1"= 600' �m Mulberry Lemay Crossings, Buffalo Run Apartments P.U.D., Preliminary, #36-96A June 19, 1997 P& Z Meeting Page 5 Secondary access will be provided in the future from Lemay with a shared private access drive on the south property line. This access drive would be constructed in conjunction with the potential community/regional shopping center and is not needed to serve the apartment complex. According to the traffic impact analysis, the key intersections are expected to operate acceptably (Level of Service "D" or better). Widening on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, adjacent to the site, will enable striping of the a center left -turn lanes at 12th Street and the proposed private access to Lincoln Avenue. The traffic study concludes that, in the short range future, the operation at the key intersections will be acceptable and other than improvements required adjacent to the property, no additional geometric or control improvements are required. The P.U.D., therefore, is feasible from a traffic operations standpoint. 6. Findings of Fact: In reviewing the request for Preliminary P.U.D., Staff makes the following findings of fact: A. The project obtains a total of 105 points on the Residential Uses Point Chart. Ot these, 65 points are derived from the "base" criteria which exceeds the minimum requirement of 40 points. The score of 105 exceeds the total minimum requirement of 100 points in order to justify the proposed density of 17.04 dwelling units per acre. B. The project complies with the All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. C. The P.U.D. is considered compatible with the surrounding area. D. The P.U.D. is feasible from a traffic operations standpoint and complies with transportation policies. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Buffalo Run Apartments, Preliminary P.U.D., #36-96A. Mulberry Lemay Crossings, Buffalo Run Apartments P.U.D., Preliminary, #36-96A June 19, 1997 P& Z Meeting Page 4 4. Design: A. Building Orientation The primary design feature of the P.U.D. is to locate the 272 required parking spaces internal to the site so that parking lots are not visible from the two adjacent arterial streets. This "central court" parking allows the buildings to form a strong relationship with the Lemay and Lincoln that is not interrupted by asphalt surface and parked cars. B. Architecture Another key design feature is the alternating mix of two building types along Lincoln to add variety to the streetscape. The buildings themselves are a mix of two and three - stories and feature a continuous brick band on the lower level combined with hardboard siding on the upper levels. Roofs are pitched and will feature the high -profile "shadowline" type of asphalt -fiberglass shingle. Multiple entries and railings will provide relief and detail to the building facades. C. Landscaping Landscaping is designed to include a significant amount of street trees since the site abuts two arterial streets. On the south property line, the landscaping contributes to the buffering needed to mitigate the potential future community/regional shopping center. The parking includes landscaping in the islands to break up the amount of hard surface. 5. Transportation: Sidewalk connections are provided from the site out to Lemay, Lincoln, and 12th Street. In addition, a connection is provided to the future private access drive that separates the apartment complex from the potential community/regional shopping center. Public sidewalks are provided on the perimeter of the site along Lemay, Lincoln and 12th Street. A private sidewalk is provided along the future private access drive along the south property line. Primary access to the site is gained from two curb cuts on Lincoln Avenue. Of these, 12th Street will be dedicated as a public street and is designed to continue south to Mulberry as a local street. The other access is a private drive located approximately 850 feet east of Lemay Avenue. Mulberry Lemay Crossings, Buffalo Run Apartments P.U.D., Preliminary, #36-96A June 19, 1997 P& Z Meeting Page 3 Having between 10% to 15% contiguity with existing urban development, 15 points. Under the "bonus," points were earned as follows: M. By providing 10% of the site (36,895 square feet) in active recreation (tot lot, basketball court, pool, and clubhouse). q. By committing to develop 30% of the total number of dwelling units for low income families (86 units, or 60%, will be deed restricted to residents making no more than 50% of the area median income). U. By providing approved automatic fire extinguishing systems. By obtaining a minimum of 40 base points and a total of 105 points on the variable criteria of the Residential Uses Point Chart of the L.D.G.S., the P.U.D. is considered appropriate at this location. 3. Neighborhood Compatibility: Two neighborhood information meetings have been held in conjunction with the O.D.P. and, specifically, with the request for a community/regional shopping center on the adjacent 43 acres to the south. These meetings were held on December 7, 1995 and January 23, 1997. Minutes to these meetings were included in the Staff Report for the Mulberry - Lemay Crossing O.D.P. for the March 24, 1997 Planning and Zoning Board hearing. The minutes are not attached due to the preponderance of comments applying to the community/regional shopping center. The few comments directed towards the multi -family project were concerned with traffic and school capacity. Traffic issues will be addressed in a subsequent section. Regarding school capacity, children from these apartments will attend Laurel Elementary, Lesher Junior High and Fort Collins High. According to Carroll Agee, Poudre School District, all three schools have available capacity to accept the estimated number of students (14 to 20 elementary -age students) generated by 144 multi -family apartments. In summary, Staff finds that the request for multi -family apartments at this location would be sensitive to and maintain the character of the surrounding area. Therefore, the Preliminary P.U.D. is considered compatible with the neighborhood. Mulberry Lemay Crossings, Buffalo Run Apartments P.U.D., Preliminary, #36-96A June 19, 1997 P& Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background: The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: I; Vacant (Lincoln East Convenience Store Preliminary P.U.D.) S: C; Vacant (Mulberry - Lemay Crossing O.D.P.) E: I (County); Existing Mix of Retail and Industrial W: CCR; Link'N Greens Public Golf Course The property was annexed in 1995 as part of a larger parcel. It is contained within the Mulberry - Lemay Crossing O.D.P. which was approved on March 24, 1997. The property has historically been used for agricultural purposes. This is the first development proposal on this site. 2. Land Use: A. Overall Development Plan As mentioned, the site is designated as Parcel A of the Mulberry - Lemay Crossing O.D.P. According to the O.D.P., Parcel A is "Multi -Family Residential" with an estimated density of 19.7 dwelling units per acre. The request for Preliminary P.U.D., therefore, is in compliance with the approved Overall Development Plan. B. Preliminary P.U.D. The P.U.D. was evaluated by the Residential Uses Point Chart of the L.D.G.S. The P.U.D. has a density of 17.04 dwelling units per acre. The P.U.D. satisfies the two absolute criteria in that (1.) The project earns a minimum of 100 total points and that (2.) the project earns a minimum of 40 points from the "base" variable criteria. A total of 105 points are earned. Under the "base," 65 points are awarded as follows: d. Partial credit for being located within 3500 feet of a neighborhood park (Buckingham Park), 10 points. f. Being within 3,000 feet of a major employment center (Fort Collins Industrial Park and East Mulberry Subdivision), 20 points. h. Being located in "north" Fort Collins, 20 points. ITEM NO. 2 MEETING DATE 6 � 1 q 19 �T STAFF TPd Shanard Citv of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Mulberry Lemay Crossings, Buffalo Run Apartments, Preliminary P.U.D., #36-96A APPLICANT: W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc. c/o Mr. Scott McFadden 4891 Independence Street, Suite 200 Wheatridge, CO 80233 OWNER: Springer -Fisher, Inc. c/o Mr. David Hill Norwest Bank 3500 J.F.K. Parkway Fort Collins, CO 80525 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for Preliminary P.U.D. for 144 multi -family dwelling units on 8.47 acres located at the southeast corner of Lemay Avenue and Lincoln Avenue. The units are divided among eight buildings. The request includes a clubhouse and recreational facilities. The parcel is zoned C, Commercial. The request is being considered as a P.U.D. reviewed by the Land Development Guidance System. RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The multi -family land use complies with the O.D.P. The P.U.D. satisfies the All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. The project earns a total score of 105 points, 65 of which are derived from the "base" criteria, on the Residential Uses Point Chart of the L.D.G.S. The P.U.D. is compatible with the neighborhood. The project is feasible from a traffic operations standpoint and complies with transportation policies. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box580 Fort Collins, CO80522-0580 (970)221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT