HomeMy WebLinkAbout2620 W. ELIZABETH ST., SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED - PDP - PDP160037 - CORRESPONDENCE -line.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: Please label size of existing water mains.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: A thrust block is required for the water main connection in
Elizabeth Street.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970416-2743, avandeutekom@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/07/2016
12/07/2016: In addition to the 6,000 minimum lot square footage there is also a
minimum lot width of 60 feet. Several of these lots are under 60 feet wide. On
the corner lots which require a 15 foot side setback, 15 foot rear setback and
20 foot front setback you are left with a very restricted buildable area.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please add bearings as marked. See redlines.
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please add angle breaks to the right of way lines to match the
section line. See redlines.
Comment Number: 14
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Per a 11/29/16 phone call, please call John Von Nieda to discuss
the pins in Detail A. See redlines.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please remove the address from the plans. With the project being
replatted, the address could change.
Comment Number: 16
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
Comment Number: 17
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they
are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the
Subdivision Plat.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 1800. See redlines.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please revise the legal description to match the legal description
on the Subdivision Plat. See redlines.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/29/2016
11/29/2016: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building
permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section
3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation
requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson @fcgov.com
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, waamargue@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: The main trunk of the new water main needs to be 8-inches in
diameter. The water main serving lots 7 & 8 can remain 6 inches.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: Please show all water and sewer services.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: Please include water main restraint for the dead end fire hydrant
12/06/2016: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 29
12/06/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please remove the address from the plans. With the project being
replatted, the address could change.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please correct the project name in the title block. See redlines.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: There is plat language missing. See redlines.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Are there any Lienholders for this property? If so, please add a
signature block. If not, please add a note stating there are none, and include
response in written comments.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: There are spelling issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please add title commitment information as available.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the
aliquot corners shown. These should be emailed directly to Jeff at
jcounty@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please label all surrounding properties with "Unplatted" or the
subdivision name. This includes properties across right of ways. See redlines.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please add Private Drive name.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Private Drive may need to be in a Tract. Please refer to comments
by other departments.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: The easements along Elizabeth self extinguish with dedication of
right of way. See redlines.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please explain why the found monuments were not accepted per
Board Rule 6.5.4.1. See redlines.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please add "See Note #6" to the labels as marked. See redlines.
12/08/2016: Please add detention pond and LID summary tables to the
Drainage Plan.
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: The detention pond needs to meet the City's Detention Pond
Landscape Standards. This includes more natural grading patterns.
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: Drainage easements are required for detention ponds, LID
facilities, and conveyance elements for the 100-year storm.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, (county@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 22
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please provide the following information for the Benchmark
Statement in the EXACT format shown below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL
DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29
UNADJUSTED FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE,
THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED
= NAVD88 - X.XX�.
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please remove the address from the plans. With the project being
replatted, the address could change.
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: There is text that needs to be rotated 180°. See redlines.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: There are cut off text issues. See redlines.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Some of the easement descriptions shown are incorrect. If they
are going to stay on the plan, they should match what is shown on the
Subdivision Plat.
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
depth of at least 150' per Land Use Code section 3.6.2(G). Please submit a
modification request to this standard.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 12/02/2016
12/02/2016: You are not allowed to count portions of the lot encumbered by
access easements/a private drive towards your minimum lot size as outlined in
Land Use Code section 3.8.8(A). Due to this, none of the lots meet the
minimum lot size in section 4.4(D)(1). You must get a modification to both of
these standards to proceed with your current site plan. Staff will not support
these modification requests.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-29329 ischiam@fcqov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 11/23/2016
11/23/2016: Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet
requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon redlines),
an Erosion Control Report (was not received in packet or was not submitted) ,
and an Escrow / Security Calculation (was not received in packet or was not
submitted). Also, based upon the area of disturbance State permits for storm
water will be required since the site is over an acre. If you need clarification
concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please
contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: The City's Low Impact Development standards are required for the
development with 50% of the site's proposed impervious surface treated.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: The City's water quality requirements are required for the
development.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: The limits of the proposed quantity detention must be in a tract
within a drainage easement and not located on individual lots.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: Lot drainage can not travel across more than 3 additional lots.
The drainage conveyance must be in a tract & drainage easement.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: The release rate for the detention pond is not the 2-year existing
rate. Please revise.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
12/08/2016: Basin E1 does not get routed into the detention pond. This
100-year flows from this basin need to be subtracted from the release rate of
the pond or routed into the pond.
The overall release rate from the site needs to equal the 2-year existing flow.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/08/2016
the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any
new fire lane must meet the following general requirements:
> Shall be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement.
> Maintain the required 20 foot minimum unobstructed width & 14 foot minimum
overhead clearance.
> Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface capable of supporting
40 tons.
> Dead-end fire access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided
with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus.
> The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum
of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside. Turning radii shall be detailed on
submitted plans.
> Be visible by painting and/or signage, and maintained unobstructed at all
times. Sign locations or red curbing should be labeled and detailed on final
plans.
> Additional access requirements exist for buildings greater than 30' in height.
Refer to Appendix D of the 2012 IFC or contact PFA for details.
International Fire Code 503.2.3, 503.2.4, 503.2.5, 503.3, 503.4 and Appendix
D; FCLUC 3.6.2(B)2006 and Local Amendments.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: AUTOTURN EXHIBIT
The fire marshal has requested that all projects provide turning templates to
indicate fire apparatus movement along private drives and throughout
Emergency Access Easements within the development site. This is particularly
needed as proposed turning radii are described at less than 25' on the
hammerhead.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: FIRE LANE DEDICATION
The proposed EAE is shown to be 28.75' wide while the width of the private
drive is shown to be 30'. For clarity, the width of the EAE should be described
as flow line to flow line (i.e. also 30' in width). On the other hand, if the intent of
the project is to allow on -street parking in the area, further redesign will be
required as parking cannot overlap with a dedicated fire lane.
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: If you are looking to seek approval for the site plan submitted for
first round of PDP, you will be required to seek modifications to the following
standards. Staff would not support this group of modification requests:
3.6.2(G) - Lot depth along an arterial street
3.8.8(A) - Lots - Area and Dimension
4.4(D)(1) - Density (minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. ft. in the RL)
4.4(D)(2)(a) - Minimum lot width of 60'
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 12/02/2016
12/02/2016: Lots with rear or front yard lines on arterial streets must have a lot
roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING - FIRE LANE signs
complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12
inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective
background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus
road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: GATING
As indicated in comment #1 above, should the "fire only" drive lane be required
to have access control, an approved plan needs to be submitted for review and
approval by the fire authority. Code language provided below.
> IFC 503.6: The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access
road shall be approved by the fire chief. Where security gates are installed, they
shall have an approved means of emergency operation. The security gates and
the emergency operation shall be maintained operational at all times.
> IFC D103.5: Gates securing fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all
of the following criteria:
1. The minimum gate width for vehicle access shall be 20 feet.
2. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type.
3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one
person.
4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times
and replaced or repaired when defective.
5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire
department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall
be approved by the fire code official.
6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with an unapproved padlock, or
chain and padlock, unless they are capable of being opened by means of
forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the key(s) to the lock is
installed at the gate location.
7. Gate design and locking device specifications shall be submitted for
approval by the fire code official prior to installation.
8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with
UL 325.
9. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and
installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F 2200.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: "FIRE ONLY" ACCESS LANE TOW ELIZABETH
> The fire access connection to W Elizabeth does not appear to meet minimum
fire lane standards. Minimum turning radii is 25' and the plan describes an
abrupt turn with a 7' radius.
> The surface for the connection to W Elizabeth is required to be a hard surface.
Compacted road base would require approval of the fire marshal. Fire lane
standards provided below.
> Roll over curb is allowable at the connection to W Elizabeth, however vertical
curbing is not allowable and further discussion is required.
FIRE LANE SPECIFICATIONS
A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. In addition to
12/07/2016: Comments from GIS:
1. Bartlett Dr has been added to the street name reservation list at
larimer.org/streets
2. Pear St (Private Drive) should be marked on the subdivision plat in place of
Drive A.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: Comment from Comcast:
Developer needs to open trench - rear lot. See image attached to the comment
letter.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, iynxwiler@goudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/21/2016
11/21/2016: FIRE ACCESS (NR)
PFA will need to see a plan as to how the project team will keep the Emergency
Access from Elizabeth open to emergency apparatus while simultaneously
keeping it clear of private vehicles and obstructions.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: WATER SUPPLY
Relocation of the existing hydrant to the dead-end, private drive with
hammerhead turnaround will dramatically delay access to water supply for the
exiting homes on Pear St that are south of W Plum. The existing hydrant on the
cul-de-sac will need to be relocated so as to remain available in it's current
location.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: STREET NAMING
Where possible, the naming of private drives is typically recommended to aid in
wayfinding. Addresses shall be posted on each structure and where otherwise
needed to aid in wayfinding. If the street is not named, monument signage may
be required to facilitate wayfinding. Code language provided below.
> IFC 505.1: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers,
building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is
plainly legible, visible from the street or road fronting the property, and posted
with a minimum of six-inch numerals on a contrasting background. Where
access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from
the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to
identify the structure.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/09/2016
12/09/2016: FIRE LANE SIGNS
The limits of the fire lane shall be fully defined. Fire lane sign locations should be
indicated on future plan sets. Signage will also be required at both entrances to
the "fire only" drive lane. Code language provided below.
> IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access
Please adjust location to keep trees 4-5 feet off fence.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated
12/07/2016:
For street tree planting in front of lots, it doesn't appear feasible to place them in
the parkway because of the proposed swale. In lieu of placing the trees in the
parkway, please show canopy shade trees behind walk as directed in Land Use
Code 3.2.1 2(b).
It may be necessary to use an upright ornamental tree, such as Chanticleer
Pear and Red Barron Crabapple, if the face of the building and sidewalk are
too close. Explore locations of a suitable tree behind the walk.
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Clay Frickey, 970-224-6045, cfrickey@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
12/07/2016
Comment Originated: 12/02/2016
12/02/2016: Comment from Real Estate Services: "In reviewing the plat note 6
identifying the overlap it might be a good idea to add to the language in the note
that the East line of the new plat of Elizabeth Street Farms is being revised by
this plat to remove the overlap or some such language so it is clear in the
language that the overlap is being corrected on the plat."
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Comments from property owners that use the irrigation lateral on
the north side of the property:
1. It is our understanding Bartlett Drive will be a private road and not be
maintained or repaired by the City? Therefor, we are requesting a legal binding
agreement be initiated prior to any development which clearly stipulates the
HOA and/or all lot owners will be responsible for all expenses incurred by the
lateral users, including any attorney fees, for any efforts to unplug and/or repair
the lateral should problems arise. This agreement will be binding for as long a
time period s the lateral is in use.
2. The concrete pipe used to line the lateral will be a minimum of 14 inches in all
segments and sealed according to the same standards as stipulated for the
City's storm sewers.
3. Three (3) "clean outs" be installed in the lateral; two spaced out from the
existing west clean out and the third at the east boundary where the lateral
exists the development.
4. We will be running water in the lateral from the first part of May until the end of
September. Our use of the lateral cannot be interrupted or interfered with in any
manner during this time period.
We believe it may be beneficial for all parties involved to meet and discuss
re -locating the lateral any potential problems which may become occur.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 12/07/2016
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated:
11/23/2016: It does not appear that the proposed street light fixture is offered in
a "warm white" option (color temperature of 3000K or less). This fixture meets
the City's standards as proposed. However, if a new fixture is selected at any
point in the process, staff encourages the applicant to select a version with a
warmer (lower) color temperature to reduce glare and light pollution.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Molly Roche, mroche@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1
11 /23/2016
Comment Originated: 12/07/2016
12/07/2016:
It appears that there are existing trees within the property lines. Please contact
the City Forester for an onsite meeting to obtain tree inventory and mitigation
information for landscape plans. Existing significant trees should be retained to
the extent reasonably feasible.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 12/07/2016
12/07/2016:
Please use the City of Fort Collins General Landscape Notes, Street Tree
Notes, and Tree Protection Notes. Also, please include the Tree Permit note in
the bolded box on all landscape sheets. The Street Tree Notes and the Tree
Permit box that are currently on the plans are not the right versions. The correct
notes are available through the project planner or the City Forester.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 12/07/2016
12/07/2016:
Please confirm that the extension of Pear Street and Bartlett Drive will be
private roads.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 12/07/2016
12/07/2016:
Street Tree Comments:
Northern Red Oak is not expected to survive long-term in Fort Collins soils.
Please replace with a species on the Fort Collins Street Tree list, such as Bur
Oak.
Arterial roads, such as Elizabeth St, are heavily treated with deicing salts.
Lindens do not survive or thrive well under these conditions, so we typically do
not recommend their placement in such proposed locations. Please replace
with a species on the Fort Collins Street Tree list, such as Hackberry.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 12/07/2016
12/07/2016:
Will proposed street trees along Elizabeth be impacted by future widening of W.
Elizabeth? It would be helpful to show sidewalk location to determine if trees will
be impacted by future widening of the road. Please review tree placement with
City of Fort Collins Transportation Planner, Amy Lewin.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 12/07/2016
12/07/2016:
The proposed street tree appear to be very close (3 feet) to the privacy fence.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: A 15 foot utility easement will need to be dedicated behind the
ROW along Elizabeth Street.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Elizabeth Street cross section on cover sheet will need to be
updated to reflect WEETC plan cross section.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Residential private drive cross section on cover shows parking -
this entire drive is within an emergency access easement and parking may not
be permitted on the easement - work with PFA to determine if this is OK.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: The WEETC plan shows a bus pullout adjacent to the property.
Please coordinate with Transfort to determine bus pullout location and design.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: The public street is not being continued; therefore, the driveway
into the subdivision will need to be constructed as LCUASS 707.2 driveway
standard — pedestrian ramps and concrete to the back of the walk.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please add a spot for the ditch company to sign the plat/accept
the ditch easement.
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-65739 slangenberger@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/18/2016
11/18/2016: The project owes an additional $516.25 for the PDP TDRFees.
The acreage was not included in the fee calculation submitted.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/23/2016
11/23/2016: Thank you for submitting an Ecological Characterization Study for
this site. Per the ECS, the only significant natural features on the site are mature
trees, which provide habitat for songbird and other avian species.
An on -site meeting with the City Forester still needs to occur to determine
mitigation requirements for the trees proposed to be removed. Please include
Environmental Planning staff (Stephanie Blochowiak or myself) in that meeting.
A tree mitigation plan should be included with the next submittal. For any native
trees that will be removed (cottonwood and boxelder), please mitigate with
other native tree species to account for the habitat value that will be lost.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/23/2016
11/23/2016: Please include a water budget chart with the next submittal that
identifies all hydrozones and total annual water use on the site, per LUC section
3.2.1(E)(3). Total annual water use should not exceed 15 gallons/square foot
over the site, including all hydrozones used on the landscape plan.
Fort Collins
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov. com/developmentre view
December 09, 2016
Mike Walker
TB GROUP
444 MOUNTAIN AVE
Fort Collins, CO 80513
RE: 2620 W Elizabeth St - Single-family Detached, PDP160037, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Project Planner, Clay Frickey, at 970-224-6045 or cfrickey@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Katie Andrews, 970-221-65015 kandrews@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Section 3.8.8 (A) of the Land Use Code states: "No part of an
area or dimension required for a lot to comply with the provisions of this code
shall be included as an area or dimension required another lot, nor shall such
required area or dimension be burdened by any easement for an abutting
private street or private drive that provides access to the lot or to any other lot."
This requirement may change the layout of the site and should be addressed as
soon as possible.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: Please review the 'West Elizabeth Enhanced Travel Corridor
Plan" which was adopted in 10/16. The ultimate cross section in the plan
(including detached walk) should be implemented with this development. Interim
and ultimate striping plans should be included with development plans.
Comment Number: 4
Comment Originated: 12/06/2016
12/06/2016: ROW will only need to be dedicated to the back of the ultimate
sidewalk (ultimate cross section found in above referenced plan). The 30' noted
on the PUD was back when the street was master -planned as a 4 lane arterial
and is no longer planned as such.