Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAPLE HILL, PHASE ONE - PDP - 29-00A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY (3)Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay Ramp/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am® Year recent on bkgr otal Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Lemay Avenue (Ramp) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I I L T R L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I I I 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 I 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 LGConfig I L T I T R I I L R I Volume 1205 790 595 610 1675 190 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 I 0 I 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left Thru A P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X WB Left I SB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P I Right A - -- Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A Green 6.0 46.0 36.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 401 1770 0.54 0.55 14.0 B T 1911. 3539 0.44 0.54 14.0 B 14.0 B Westbound T 1628 3539 0.38 0.46 18.4 B 9.9 A R 1377 1583 0.47 0.87 1.7 A Northbound Southbound L 1270 3433 0.56 0.37 25.6 C 23.5 C R 744 1583 0.27 0.47 16.3 B Intersection Delay = 15.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c . Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: an� Intersection: CR52/Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. :%. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor '->bkgrccotal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 120 35 1 10 60 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 141 41 1- 11 70 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes . Configuration IW- 'Approach Movement Lane Config 1 1 5 10 1 95 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1 1 5 11 1 ill 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 141 11 7 123 C(m) (vph) 1509 1567 739 896 v/c 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.14 95% queue length 0.31 0.02 0.03 0.48 Delay 7.6 7.3 9.9 9.7 'Control LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.9 9.7 Approach LOS A A ' i Michael ' Matthew HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c P. Delich J. Delich, P.E. I� Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 10/1 02 Period: a Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Mountain Vista Inter.: Mtn Vista/Timberline Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Coll' s Year recent shor bkgr total N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I No. Lanes 1 I I I I 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 LGConfig 1 TR I LT I LR I I Volume I 140 175 1200 245 1285 175 1 I Lane Width I 12.0 1 12.0 I 12.0 I RTOR Vol I 0 I I 0 I I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P 1 Right A Peds X I Peds X WB Left P I SB Left Thrg P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 55.0 35.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS tbound TR 948 Westbound LT 606 1723 0.39 0.55 14.1 B 1102 0.86 0.55 34.3 C 14.1 B 34.3 C Northbound LR 600 1714 0.90 0.35 47.7 D 47.7 D Southbound Intersection Delay = 34.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 11 11 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c , Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Country Club/Street 7 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 7 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 215 115 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 226 121 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles.. 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume 10 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 15 20 C(m) (vph) 1441 763 v/c 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.03 0.08 Control Delay 7.5 9.8 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.8 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. .- -- - -_. ---�• ------ - ------ - - Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline Ramp/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am pm Year on recent bkgrd total Project ID. E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Timberline Road (Ramp) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I 1 L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes I I I I 1 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 1 2 2 0 1 0 2 1 LGConfig I L T 1 T R I I L R I Volume 1445 480 1 370 195 I 1315 480 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 I 0 I 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left Thru A P 1 Thru Right I Right Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left i 1 SB Left A Thru P 1 Thru Right P - - - 1 Right A - Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 17.0 41.0 30.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 618 3433 0.76 0.18 44.3 D T 2123 3539 0.24 0.60 9.4 A 26.2 C Westbound T 1451 3539 0.27 0.41 20.0+ C 14.3 B R 1203 1583 0.17 0.76 3.4 A Northbound Southbound L 549 1770 0.60 0.31 31.2 C 23.4 C R 823 15.83 0.61 0.52 18.3 B Intersection Delay = 22.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS o C07 1 --------- -_n._____-- --- _________--- Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay Ramp/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: m pm Year recent hort bkgr total Project : 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Lemay Avenue (Ramp) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L I T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 1 I I "'0 I I 1 I 1 0 1 0 1 1 ' 0 0 1 1 -0 LGConfig I L T I T R 7 L R I Volume 1100 185 1 305 270 1 1210 135 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol I I 0 I I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left Thru A P 1 Thru Right I Right Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left 1 SB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P I Right A Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 6.0 48.0 34.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 496 1770 0.24 0.57 11.2 B T 1043 1863 0.21 0.56 11.1 B 11.1 B Westbound T 894 1863 0.39 0.48 17.9 B 10.0+ B R 1377 1583 0.22 0.87 1.1 A Northbound Southbound L 619 1770 0.39 0.35 24.9 C 21.8 C R 712 1583 0.22 0.45 16.9 B Intersection Delay = 13.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538' Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS &Z BCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period:�m Intersection: Country Club/Street 11 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent <2bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 11 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments or Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 15 45 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 17 52 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 5 12 C(m) (vph) 1553 1002 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.01 0.04 Control Delay 7.3 8.6 LOS A A Approach Delay 8.6 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. % D II GILLESPIE FARM (MAPLE HILL) TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO NOVEMBER 2002 Prepared for: Sollenberger Development Company P.O. Box 272469 Fort Collins, CO 80527 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 PP�p REG/S� 1520 y!A N E m aD � n E i= short range long range Vista TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 10 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am<10> 1 Intersection: Country Club/Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound I Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 45 1 1 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 52 1- 1- 1- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, 'Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L (vph) 52 'v C(m) (vph) 1620 v/c 0.03 95% queue length 0.10 Control Delay 7.3 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS U 0.85 0.85 1 29 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 I I LR 9 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Delich Delich, P.E. 0� 1070 0.03 0.09 8.5 A 8.5 A ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: (�pm Intersection: CR52/Street 5 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent EEr kgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 75 150 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 88 176 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 .8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume I Z)U Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 58 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 Lane Config L I I Southbound 11 12 LR v (vph) 23 69 C(m) (vph) 1394 834 v/c 0.02 0.08 951 queue length 0.05 0.27 Control Delay 7.6 9.7 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.7 ' Approach LOS A ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. r HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period:pm Intersection: ountry Club/Street 7 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or bkgrd<fEiD Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 7 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 50 165 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 58 194 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R vo.iume 1 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v kvpn) 11 24 C(m) (vph) 1378 841 v/c 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.02 0.09 Control Delay 7.6 9.4 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Zi 'Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Date: 10/15/02 Period: am m Project I 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive 'No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: Lemay/Vine Ramp Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent s or kgr total (Ramp) N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I I 1 2 0 I I 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 I 0 2 1 I I L R( T R I L T i I 1205 150 1 305 75 1225 715 1 I 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I I 1 0 1 0 1 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru I Thru A P" Right A I Right Peds X ( Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A 'Green 34.0 6.0 48.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100:0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound ' Westbound L 619 1770 0.38 0.35 24.7 C 'R 712 1583 0.24 0.45 17.1 B Northbound 21.5 C T 1699 3539 0.19 0.48 15.1 B 12.3 B R 1377 1583 0.06 0.87 0.9 A Southbound L 589 170 0.44 0.57 13.5 B T 1982 3 39 0.42 0.56 12.8 B 13.0 B Intersectio:§ Delay = 14.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B iHCS2+: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 I ' Phone: 970-669-2061,__ Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS_ 3 S� M m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M .= M Niultimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p 20 I -OS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service - connectivity nmdmwn actual proposed base connectivity: C I J specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address destination area classification (see text) i� ^ City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan Douglas Road U CR52 CR50E Mountain Vista a� c_ z m E i= co 0: U ca N d J Vine SCALE: 1 "=2000' BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA Maltimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual P. Ig LOS Standards for Development Review _ Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: OT KE �. (enter as many as apply) ❑© m description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address 12�leamzvs LAKA COU"Tie Y CGug L"JD PoPEkTy CFv rv2> destination area classification (see text) �cs r r�l�urra �srDeurra level of service (minimum based on project location classification) New1n<ss ;rntlinvih• sVeN nMSing� sisnel inlera� h vi senn• unndd.$ ntitinuan , c' .0 Cr C_ act"al E C C C proposed A �Q /C 41, 4IC 131O �01[�IC�l1[,l101 ®�1 IC�IDI�IC�1 ��I�IDIDIF�Ii mh>mtan actual miidnnan actual proposed QtgµAQ�S BAKE Codu,gy l:cv6 Q._ ~ City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan Douglas Road U O 1 LLI— CR52 :-i CR50E �� U �O• Mountain Vista d _c z a> a E F- _M Q' U T !0 m J Vine SCALE: V=2000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA APPENDIX G HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am(: ) Intersection: CRS //Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort 'Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent ong kgrd ota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 120 65 1 1 130 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 126 68 1 1 136 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 1 1 10 1 95 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 1 10 1 100 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 126 1 3 ill C(m) (vph) 1430 1532 516 827 v/c 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.13 95% queue length 0.29 0.00 0.02 0.46 Control Delay 7.8 7.4 12.0 10.0+ LOS A A B B Approach Delay 12.0 10.0+ Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 13 4. ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: m pm 'Intersection: 52/Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent lon bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 55 120 1 1 45 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 57 126 1- 1 47 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type. Undivided Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 1 1 1 1 10 1 115 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 1 10 1 121 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 57 1 3 132 C(m) (vph) 1554 1459 638 969 v/c 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.14 958 queue length 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.47 Control Delay 7.4 7.5 10.7 9.3 LOS A A B A Approach Delay 10.7 9.3 Approach LOS B A . HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. t 2� J HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: CR5 /Street 3 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 3 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 25 180 1 1 215 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 26 189 1 1 226 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ($) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 1 1 1 5 1 10 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 1 1 5 1 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I . LTR I LTR v (vph) 26 1 3 16 C(m) (vph) 1331 1384 560 649 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.08 Control Delay 7.8 7.6 11.5 10.7 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11.5 10.7 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 3z HCS2000:. Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am m 'Intersection: 52/Street 3 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 3 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 10 170 1 1 155 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 178 1_ 1 163 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, 'Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L v (vph) C(m) (vph) 10 1410 v/c 0.01 95% queue length Control Delay 0.02 7.6 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS ' 1 1 1 5 1 2D 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 1 1 5 1 21 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 RE 0 1 0 LTR Queue Length, and Level WB Northbound 4 1 7 8 9 L I LTR 1 3 1397 635 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 7.6 10.7 A B 10.7 B hrel 0 1 0 LTR of Service Southbound 10 11 12 1 LTR HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 131 787 0.03 0.11 9.7 A 9.7 A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/1 /02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: CRS /Street 5 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 65 200 1 1 215 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 68 210 1 1 226 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 1 1 1 5 1 30 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 1 1 5 1 31 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No 20 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 68 1 3. 37 C(m) (vph) 1331 1360 475 696 v/c 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.16 0.00 0.02 0.17 Control Delay 7.9 7.6 12.6 10.5 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 12.6 10.5 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: pm CR52/Street 5 'Intersection: Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd total ID: 0190 'Project East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 20 170 1 1 170 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 178 1- 1 178 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes . Configuration a 1 1 1 10 1 SU 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 1 1 10 1 52 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 LTR 0 1 0 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 21 1 3 63 C(m) (vph) 1392 1397 592 784 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.08 95% queue length 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.26 Control Delay 7.6 7.6 11.1 10.0- LOS A A B A Approach Delay 11.1 10.0- Approach LOS B A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1 Z G% HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: CR5 /Street 6 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent lon bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 6 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 260 5 1 240 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 273 5 1 252 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 'I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L 5 1 1 b 1 10 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 5 1 1 5 1 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 15 1 7 16 C(m) (vph) 1308 1285 454 601 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 95% queue length 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.08 Control Delay 7.8 7.8 13.1 11.2 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 13.1 11.2 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael 'Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: 4552/Street 6 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent lon bkgr total 'Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 6 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T iR I L T R Volume 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? 'Lanes 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal? 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 194 0 1 226 5 1 0 1 1 0 TR L TR No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 B 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 5 1 1 5 1 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1 1 5 1 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1• 4 1 7 B 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR (vph) b 1 / Zl 'v C(m) (vph) 1337 1379 544 702 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.09 Control Delay 7.7 7.6 11.7 10.3 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11.7 10.3 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections. Release 4.1c Michael P 'Matthew J Delich Delich, P.E. rz? Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 10/15/02 Period: am Project ID: 0190 E/W St: CR52 Inter.: CR11/CR52 Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent on bkgrd tota N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I 1 1 0 I I 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 0 I I I 1 1 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 15 1 35 1130 1 125 160 530 200 180 365 5 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right - I EB Right - --- - -- SB Right I WB Right Green 38.0 52.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 475 1219 0.01 0.39 18.7 B TR 605 1591 0.06 0.38 19.7 B 19.6 B Westbound L 518 1329 0.26 0.39 21.0 C TR 602 1585 0.22 0.38 21.2 C 21.1 C Northbound L 434 818 0.15 0.53 12.7 B TR 929 1786 0.83 0.52 28.6 C 27.4 C Southbound L 148 279 0.57 0.53 30.6 C TR 967 1859 0.40 0.52 15.8 B 18.4 B Intersection Delay = 23.5 (sec/veh). Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 970-669-5034 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: CR11/CR52 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 6�pm Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent ong kgr total 'Period: Project ID: 0190 E/W St: CR52 N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ' I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I Lanes ( 1 1 0 I i I I 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 I 'No. LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume I10 1 55 1175 1 60 125 245 80 I110. 600 5 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I ' RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right 38.0 52.0 'Green Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/. Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 506 1298 0.02 0.39 18.8 B TR 603 1588 0.10 0.38 20.0+ C 19.8 B ' Westbound L 509 1304. 0.36 0.39 22.1 C TR 603 1588 0.11 0.38 20.1 C 21.6 C Northbound L 242 457 0.11 0.53 12.6 B TR 933 1794 0.37 0.52 15.3 B 15.2 B Southbound L 473 89,3 0.25 0.53 13.9 B ' TR 968 1861 0.66 0.52 21.0 C 19.9 B Intersection Delay = 19.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven .Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' Date Performed: 10/15 02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: CR1 /Street D Jurisdiction: Fort Collins ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Street D ' North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments t Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R ' Volume 790 35 1 530 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 831 36 1 557 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No — -- - Lanes 1 1 1 1 ' Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R , Volume 20 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 21 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ' Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage ' RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' Lane Config L I LR 1 v (vph) 1 22 C(m) (vph) 777 296 ' v/c 0.00 0.07 95% queue length 0.00 0.24 Control Delay 9.6 18.1 LOS A C ' Approach Delay 18.1 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c , Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' � Z �1- HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: CR11/Street D Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary . Analysis Year: recent long bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Street D North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 350 10 1 830 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 368 10 1 873 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach' Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade M 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 Configuration LR L 0.95 1 2 Delay, Queue Length, and Level Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 Lane Config L I LR (vph) 1 .52 'v C(m) (vph) 1180 319 v/c 0.00 0.10 95% queue length 0.00 0.33 Control Delay 8.1 17.5 LOS A C Approach Delay 17.5 Approach LOS C ' 0 of Service Eastbound 1 10 11 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael Matthew P. Delich J. Delich, P.E. I23 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 , Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: CR1 /Street C Jurisdiction: Fort Collins ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 ,East/West Street: Street C ' North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ' Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R ' Volume 825 65 1 550 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 868 68 1 .578 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T ' Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R. L T R Volume 35 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 36 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ' Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? ' Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR t Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR ' v (vph) 1 37 C(m) (vph) 732 282 v/c 0.00 0.13 ' 95% queue length 0.00 0.45 Control Delay 9.9 19.7 LOS A C Approach Delay 19.7 , Approach LOS C 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. OT • b A4 TAV CTTOTl7AS.7A'LTTT nn7.TT2nfiTC ] llfl (17 C'lA ...,.,�....... ......may.------ -......-.,------- .------- ..-- ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael 'Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Rll/Street C 'Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgr total Project ID: 0190 'East/West Street: Street C North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments . Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R tVolume 360 20 1 860 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 378 21 1 905 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume bu Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 'Percent Grade M 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 Configuration LR M 0.95 1 2 ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 ' Lane Config L I LR v (vpn) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay 'LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 1160 306 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.77 8.1 19.8 A C 19.8 C Ct of Service Eastbound 1 10 11 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c 'Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ,2� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: CR1 /Street B Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Street B North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T, R Volume - 890 25 1 585 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 936 26 1 615 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1b i Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1' 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 1 16 C(m) (vph) 715 258 v/c 0.00 0.06 95% queue length 0.00 0.20 Control Delay 10.0+ 19.9 LOS B C. Approach Delay 19.9 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. IZ'0 ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4. lc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10 15/02 Analysis Time Period: pm 'Intersection: R11/Street B Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen long bkgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Street B. North/South Street: CR11 ' Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T' R I L T R Volume 380 10 1 920 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 400 10 1 968 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration - TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config. v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 15% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay ' Approach LOS 0.95 0.95 26 1 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR Queue Length, and Level SB Westbound 4 I 7 8 9 L I LR 1149 287 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.31 8.1 18.8 A C 18.8 C M of Service Eastbound 1 10 11 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael ' Matthew P. Delich J. Delich, P.E. M HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: Coun ry Club/Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd tots Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 30 35 105 135 45 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 36 110 142 47 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 'I L T R Volume 125 55 160 10 30 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 131 57 168 10 31 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0 1 0 LTR 0 1 0 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 31 142 356 56 C(m) (vph) 1533 1436 555 429 v/c 0.02 0.10 0.64 0.13 95% queue length 0.06 0.33 4.54 0.45 Control Delay 7.4 7.8 22.4 14.6 LOS A A C B Approach Delay 22.4 14.6 Approach LOS C B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. v Q ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm 'Intersection: ountry Club/Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 1 ' Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 10 45 135 45 30 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 47 142 47 31 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 45 15 15 15 50 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 47 15 15 15 52 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR (vph) 10 47 77 93 'v C(m) (vph) 1575 1385 625 657 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.12 0.14 95% queue length 0.02 0.11 0.42 0.49 Delay 7.3 7.7 11.6 11.4 'Control LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11.6 11.4 Approach LOS B B ■ HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Matthew J. Delich Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/1�_(02 Analysis Time Period: am(pm.) Intersection: Country Club/Street 11 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent ong)bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 11 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R volume 10 165 175 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 173 184 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? - --- Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R voiume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 5 5 0.95 0.95 5 5 2 2 0 0 No 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 10 10 C(m) (vph) 1379 747 v/c 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.04 Control Delay 7.6 9.9 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.9 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. If nk-OZUVV: U115.Ly11a11LeU 111Le1JeUL1Ullb 1Ce1e[YJe ' -. U TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period pm Intersection: Country Club/Street 11 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd 6El> Project ID: 0190 1 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 11 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0 Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 180 95 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 189 100 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? 1- 1 1 0 'Lanes Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume 10_ 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median'Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration iDelay, Queue Length, and Level Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 ' Lane Config L I v (vph) 5 C(m) (vph) 1486 v/c 0.00 95% queue length 0.01 Control Delay 7.4 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 0 LR of Service Southbound I 10 11 12 1 LR HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ,Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 20 814 0.02 0.08 9.5 A 9.5 A TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am® Intersection: Country Club/Street 5 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent long bkgrd ota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 I, 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 60 130 30 20 95 65 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 63 136 31 21 100 68 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 1 10 35 1 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 1 10 36 1 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 63 21 26 68 C(m)'(vph) 1410 1411 569 615 v/c 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.11 95% queue length 0.14 0.05 0.14 0.37 Control Delay 7.7 7,6 11.6 11.6 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11.6 11.6 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. it (4- 11 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period:< 3aPpm Intersection: Country Club/Street 5 tJurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent(a2ng>bkgrd ota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 115 10 5 80 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0..95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 121 10 5: 84 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1` 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 'Percent Grade ($) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage kanes T Channelized? Configuration 25 1 15 55 1 55 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 26 1 15 57 1 57 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No No 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 'Movement Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 15 5 4L 115 C(m) (vph) 1486 1454 700 786 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.15 95% queue length 0.03 0.01 0.19 0.51 Control Delay 7.4 7.5 10.5 10.4 'LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.5 10.4 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c 'Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1 11 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Country Club/Street 10 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent on bkgrd tota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road ' North/South Street: Street 10 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ' Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R , Volume 15 210 125 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 221 131 15 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 10 10 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 10 Percent.Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 , Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage ' RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 , Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 15 20 C(m) (vph) 1436 761 ' v/c 0.01 0.03 95% queue length 0.03 0.08 Control Delay 7.5 9.9 LOS A A ' Approach Delay 9.9 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: ountry Club/Street 10 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent ong bkgr tots Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 10 ' Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R i L T R Volume 5 125 155 5 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Peak Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 131 163 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 15 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage No RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 ' Configuration LR I Approach ' Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length 'Control Delay LOS. Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L I I LR 5 30 1410 785 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.12 7.6 9.8 A A 9.8 A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: cn pm 'Intersection: ountry Club/Street 7 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis. Year: recent lon bkgrd ota 'Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street'7 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume b 11S lb7 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 121 173 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (8) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration I Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay ■ Approach LOS 15" 1J 0.95 0.95 15 15 2 2 0 0 No 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I I LR 5 30 1398 781 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.12 7.6 9.8 A A 9.8 A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Matthew J. Delich Delich, P.E. .....,.. ,. .. ,.. .,may. .. �.`....... _......-.. ,...��...... _...-.. _.... _._� Analyst: Michael Inter.: CR11/Country Club ' Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am<0) Year recent <IEbkgrd total Project ID: 0190 ' E/W St: Country Club N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I ' I L I T R I L T R I L T R I L T R j No. Lanes I 1 I I I I 1 0 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 LGConfig I L T R i L TR I L T R I L T R I ' Volume 1150 85 45 190 50 10 1155 755 165 120 505 75 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left A A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X ' WB Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X ' NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right Green 6.0 28.0 6.0 46.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 ' All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach , Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS , Eastbound L 457 1770 0.35 0.37 22.4 C T 522 1863 0.17 0.28 27.4 C 23.4 C R 617 1583 0.08 0.39 19.2 B Westbound , L 450 1770 0.21 0.37 21.3 C TR 508 1815 0.13 0.28 27,0 C 23.6 C Northbound ' L 344 1770 0.47 0.55 15.3 B T 857 1863 0.93 0.46 42.9 D 34.0 C R 902 1583 0.19 0.57 10.5 B ' Southbound L 198 1770 0.11 0.55 19.7 B T 857 1863 0.62 0.46 23.8 C 21.9 C R 902 1583 0.09 0.57 9.8 A ' Intersection Delay = 28.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. , 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Inter.: CRll/Country Club Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins 'Period: 6ppm Year recent <2bkgrd ota Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Country Club N/S St: CR11 ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I i I I INo. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R I Volume 160 40 85 1130 75 10 170 320 70 110 825 110 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 ' RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 ( 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A WB Right IGreen 6.0 23.0 6.0 51.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.01 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp' Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 384 1770 0.16 0.32 24.3 C T 421 1863 0.10 0.23 30.4 C 25.1 C R 538 1583 0.17 0.34 23.2 C Westbound L 396 1770 0.35 0.32 25.7 C TR 421 1821 0.21 0.23 31.4 C 28.0 C Northbound L 199 1770 0.37 0.60 20.8 C T 950 1863 0.35 0.51 15.7 B 15.2 B IR 981 1583 0.08 0.62 7.6 A Southbound L 558 1770 0.02 0.60 8.7 A T 950 1863 0.91 0.51 37.1 D 33.3 C IR 981 1583 0.12 0.62 7.8 A Intersection Delay = 27.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J.'Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 IPhone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 970-669-5034 Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline Ramp/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins a�pm Year recent on bkgrd total 'Period: Project . 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Timberline Road (Ramp) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I I L T R I I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes I 2 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 I LGConfig I L T I T R I I L R I Volume 1495 395 I 515 340 1 1230 570 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 I 0 1 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left Thru A P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X WB Left I SB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A Green 17.0 41.0 30.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 618 T 2123 Westbound T 1451 ' R 1203 Northbound ' Southbound L 549 3433 0.84 0.18 49.9 D 3539 0.20 0.60 9.1 A 31.8 C 3539 0.37 0.41 21.3 C 14.4 B 1583 0.30 0.76 3.9 A 1770 0.44 0.31 28.1 C 23.7 C R 823 1583 0.73 0.52 21.9 C Intersection Delay = 23.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Michael P 'Matthew J 2272 Glen Loveland, HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Delich Delich, P.E. Haven Drive CO 80538 'Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ��. ..V✓[..vvv• ✓ate• vrr.+a.Y r• .. r _______,_ _ Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Vine Ramp Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E.' Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am- Year recent on bkgr otal Project ID:�190 E/W St: Vine Drive (Ramp) N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound i I L T R I I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 I I 2 0 1 I 1 0 2 1 I I I 1 2 0 I LGConfig I I L R I T R I L T Volume I 1425 215 1 480 650 1145 300 I Lane Width I 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 1 0 1 0 1 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru 1 Thru P Right I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 38.0 6.0 44.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.02.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 1339 3433 0.33 0.39 21.5 C R 776 1583 0.29 0.49 15.4 B Northbound T 1557 3539 0.32 0.44 18.8 R 1377 1583 0.50 0.87 1.8 Southbound L 440 1770 0.35 0.53 13.1 T 1840 3539 0.17 0.52 12.7 Intersection Delay = 12.8 (sec/veh) B A B B 19.5 B 9.0 A 12.8 B Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 104- 1I Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Date: 10/15/02 'Period: pm Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive Inter.: Timberline/Vine Ramp Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent on bkgr tota (Ramp) N/S.St: Timberline Road ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 0 0 0 I 2 0 1 I 0 2 1 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig I I L R I T R I L T I Volume I 1735 100 1 230 560 1240 450 1 Lane Width 1 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 ' RTOR Vol I 1 0 1 0 I I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru I Thru A P Right A - -- - I Right Peds X I Peds X ' NB Right A I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A 'Green 38.0 6.0 44.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound Westbound L 1339 ' R 776 Northbound T 1557 ' R 1377 Southbound L 583 T 1840 11 3433 0.58 0.39 1583 0.14 0.49 3539 0.16 0.44 1583 0.43 0.87 1770 0.43 0.53 3539 0.26 0.52 Intersection Delay = 14.7 24.6 C 23.4 C 14.0 B 17.0 B 6.1 A 1.6 A 15.4 B 13.4 B 14.1 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ....--.. .. ... -may. .��........ ,. �.,.... ..,.-.. `..... .. _„ Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay Ramp/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 1 15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins 'Period: pm Year recent on bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Lemay Avenue (Ramp) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I 'No. Lanes I 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 LGConfig I L T I T R I I L R I Volume 1150 465 660 700 I 1485 215 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1 ' RTOR Vol I I 0 I I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: A11 other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left Thru A P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X WB Left I SB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A Green 6.0 46.0 36.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 371 1770 0.43 0.55 13.1 B T 1111 3539 0.26 0.54 12.3 B 12.5 B 1 Westbound IT 1628 3539 0.43 0.46 19.0 B 10.2 B 'R 1377 1583 0.54 0.87 2.0 A Northbound I Southbound L 1270 3433 0.40 0.37 23.5 C 21.4 C ' R 744 1583 0.30 0.47 16.6 B Intersection Delay = 13.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Michael P. Matthew J. 2272 Glen Loveland, HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Delich Delich, P.E. Haven Drive CO 80538 I' Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 1 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 10( Analyst: Michael Inter.:-Lemay/Vine Ramp Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am m Year recent bkgr otal on Project ID. 190 E/W St: Vine Drive (Ramp) N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSE( I Eastbound I Westbound I L T R I L T R I I No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I I L R Volume I 1475 340 Lane Width I 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 1 0 :TION SUMMARY Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I L T R I I 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 1 T R I L T I 1050 455 1410 655 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru 1 Thru P Right 1 Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right A 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 28.0 14.0 46.0 Yellow 3.0 6.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios. Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Westbound L 996 3433 0.50 0.29 29.9 C 25.2 C R 744 1583 0.48 0.47 18.6 B Northbound T 1628 3539 0.68 0.46 23.5 C 17.4 B R 1251 1583 0.38 0.79 3.4 A Southbound L 515 3433 0.84 0.15 53.0 D T 2194 3539 0.31 0.62 9.0 A 26.0 C Intersection Delay = 22.0 (set/veh) :Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS o() LIVJLVVV• Jll'11G11LG1 1111.G1JG\r 1.1 V11J !\GIGGJG '1. 1.. Analyst: Michael Inter.:•Lemay/Vine Ramp Agency:. Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: l 15/02 apm Jurisd: Year Fort Collins recent. ong kgr total 'Period: Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive (Ramp) N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY . I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I 'No. Lanes I 0 0 0 I 2 0 1 I 0 2 1 I 2 2 0 I LGConfig I I L R I T R I L T Volume I 1585 265 1 355 180 1500 1015 1 Lane Width 1 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I ' RTOR Vol I 1 0 1 0 I I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds X i Peds X WB Left A i SB Left A Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 30.0 17.0 41.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 1064 3433 0.58 0.31 29.8 C 'R 823 1583 0.34 0.52 14.2 B Northbound 25.0 - C 1451 3539 0.25 0.41 19.9 B 14.3 B 'T R 1203 1583 0.16 0.76 3.3 A Southbound L 618 3433 0.85 0.18 50.7 D T 2123, 3539 0.50 0.60 11.7 B 24.5 C Intersection Delay = 22.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Michael P. Matthew J. 2272 Glen Loveland, HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Delich Delich, P.E. Haven Drive CO 80538 'Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS q 1 APPENDIX F I 11 11 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael ' Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: R52/Street 1 t Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgr total ' Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 , .L T R I L T R Volume 55 35 1 5 30 5 Peak -Hour Factor,_PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85_ 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 64 41 1 5 35 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 1 10 10 1 115 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.$5 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 11 11 1 135 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 64 5 13 147 C(m) (vph) 1570 1567 927 994 v/c 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.15 95% queue length 0.13 0.01 0.04 0.52 Control Delay 7.4 7.3 8.9 9.2 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 8.9 9.2 Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: CR52/Street 3 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent s or bkgrd tota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 3 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 25 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median TypeUndivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal? 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 176 1 5 164 11 1 0 1 1 0 TR L TR No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 1 1 5 1 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 1 5 1 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Configuration LTR LTR 'Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay ' LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, 'and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L L I LTR I LTR 29 5 3 17 1401 1399 599 712 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.07 7.6 7.6 11.0 10.2 A A B B 11.0 10.2 B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period:<�S)pm Intersection: CR52/Street 3 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent <eo bkgr .total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 3 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 85 1 0 140 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 99 1 0 164 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0. Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor.Street: Approach Northbound. Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 1 1 5 1 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly'"Flow Rate; HFR 1 1 1 5 1 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 11 0 3 29 C(m) (vph) 1409 1493 704 819 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.11 Control Delay 7.6 7.4 10.1 9.6 LOS A A B A Approach Delay 10.1 9.6 Approach LOS B A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c .TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Michael 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: CRC/Street 5 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or bkgrd ota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW� Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 65 165 1 5 135 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 76 194 1-, 5 158 11 s Percent Heavy Vehicle 2 2 Median Type Undivided Channelized? 'RT Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No t Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R i L T R Volume 1 1 5 5 1 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 5 5 1 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Approach: Exists? No No flared Storage T Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration t LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 76 5 7 41 C(m) (vph) 1409 1378 659 768 v/c 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.17 0.01 0.03 0.17 Control Delay 7.7 7.6 10.5 10.0- LOS A A B A Approach Delay 10.5 10.0- Approach LOS B A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ,Matthew J. Delich, P.E. q3 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY , Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: m pm Intersection: R52/Street 5 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent 63>bkgrd Iota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) ' North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ' Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 20 80 1 5 150 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 94 1 5 176 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 1 5 10 1 50 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 5 11 1 58 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 ' Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9, 1 10 Southbound 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 23 5 7 70 C(m) (vph) 1394 1499 800 ' 806 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.09 95% queue length 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.28 Control Delay 7.6 7.4 9.5 9.9 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.5 9.9 Approach LOS A A 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �2 nuazuuu: unsignaiizeu lnLeI6"UUlunZ� 4.1� iTWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am® Intersection: CR52/Street 6 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 6 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 220 10 5 155 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 258 11 5 182 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0, 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 1 5 5 1 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 1 5 5 1 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 17 5 11 17 C(m) (vph) 1387 1295 572 668 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 95% queue length 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.08 Control Delay 7.6 7.8 11.4 10.5 LOS A A Approach Delay 11.4 10.5 Approach LOS B B t HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c 1 Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: m Intersection: R52/Street 6 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent cfor bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 6 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 L T R I L Westbound 5 6 T R Volume 5 90 0 0 195 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 105 0 0 229 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (�) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage 10 1 5 5 1 15 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 11 1 5 5 1 17 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 No ice RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 5 0 17 23 C(m) (vph) 1333 1486 658 738 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.08 0.10 Control Delay 7.7 7.4 10.6 10.0+ LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.6 10.0+ Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 10 Analyst: Michael Inter.: CR11/CR52 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Period: am pm Jurisd: Fort Collins Year recent or bkgrd total Project ID. 90 E/W St: CR52 N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ' I Eastbound Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 I I I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 15 1 35 1165 1 5 160 435 240 15 300 5 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8' EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A i Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right 36.0 54.0 tGreen Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 505 1365 0.01 0.37 19.9 B TR 572 1590 0.07 0.36 21.1 C 20.9 C Westbound L 489 1322 0.40 0.37 23.8 C TR 584 1623 0.01 0.36 20.6 C 23.7 C Northbound L 501 911 0.14 0.55 11.6 B TR 953 1764 0.83 0.54 27.7 C 26.4 C Southbound L 155 281 0.04 0.55 10.8 B TR 1003 1858 0.34 0.54 13.9 B 13.8 B Intersection Delay = 22.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C VHCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS I ' � Analyst: Michael Inter.: CRll/CR52 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 10/15/02 pm Jurisd: Year Fort Collins recent or bkgrd otal Project 0190 E/W St: CR52 N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 ( 1 1 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 L TR 1 Volume I10 1 55 1215 1 5 125 195 90 15 400 5 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0, 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 38.0 52.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 533 1367 0.02 0.39 18.8 B TR 603 1588 0.11 0.38 20.1 C 19.9 B Westbound L 505 1296 0.50 0.39 23.9 C TR 617 1623 0.01 0.38 19.3 B 23.8 C Northbound L 363 684 0.08 0.53 12.0 B TR 922 1774 0.36 0.52 15.3 B 15.0 B Southbound L 479 904 0.01 0.53 11.2 B TR 967 1859 0.49 0.52 17.3 B 17.2 B Intersection Delay = 18.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS S of HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am(35) 'Intersection: CR11/Street D Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Street D North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 730 55 1 500 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 858 64 1 588 No 1 1 1 1 T R L T No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 . Configuration LR 0 0.85 1 2 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 1 36 C(m) (vph) 741 283 v/c 0.00 0.13 95% queue length 0.00 0.43 Control Delay 9.9 19.6 LOS A C Approach Delay 19.6 Approach LOS C ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Matthew J. Delich Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4. lc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period:�m Intersection: CR11/Street D Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent Gr bkgrd ota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street:' Street D North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 310 15 1 670 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 364 17 1 788 Percent Heavy Vehicles. -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 'I L T R volume SU 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR 1 v (vph) 1 59 C(m) (vph) 1177 344 v/c 0.00 0.17 95% queue length 0.00 0.61 Control Delay 8.1 17.6 LOS A C Approach Delay 17.6 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. z HE HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am 'Intersection: CR11/Street C Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent ort bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Street C North/South Street: CR11 ' Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 775 110 1 530 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 iHourly Flow Rate, HFR 911 129 1 623 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 41 Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 60 1 0.85 0.85 70 1 2 2 0 0 No 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 Lane Config L I LR v (vph) C (m) (vph) 1 669 71 264 v/c 0.00 0.27 95% queue length Control Delay 0.00 10.4 1.06 23.6 LOS B C Approach Delay 23.6 Approach LOS C of Service Eastbound I 10 11 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. i I � s' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period:49a>pm Intersection: CR11/Street C Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or bkgrd<iotal> Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Street C North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 325 30 1 720 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 382 35 1 847 No 1 1 1 1 T R L T No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 95 1 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ill 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 Lane Config L I LR I Eastbound 11 12 v (vph) 1 112 C(m) (vph) 1142 320 v/c 0.00 0.35 95% queue length 0.00 1.53 Control Delay 8.2 22.2 LOS A C Approach Delay 22.2 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c 11 11 11 11 Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. M 11 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am 'Intersection: CR1 /Street B Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent OIE2Dbkgrd total Project ID:. 0190 East/West Street: Street B North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Vehicle Major Street: Approach Movement 1 Study period (hrs): 0.25 Volumes and Adjustments Northbound Southbound 2 3 I 4 5 6 IL T R I L T R Volume 860 45 1 590 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1011 52 1 694 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -_ Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 'I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, 'Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length IControl Delay LOS Approach Delay ■ Approach LOS 20 1 0.85 0.85 23 1 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR A Queue Length, and Level of Service SB Westbound Eastbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I LR I 1 24 655 229 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.35 10.5 22.6 B C 22.6 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. g� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10 15/02 Analysis Time Period: a m Intersection: CR11/Street B Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Street B , North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ' Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R , Volume 350 10 1 815 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 411 11 1 958 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound ' Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 35 1 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? ' Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 1 42 C(m) (vph) 1137 286 v/c 0.00 0.15 95% queue length 0.00 0.51 Control Delay 8.2 19.7 LOS A C ' Approach Delay 19.7 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �Z ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: a®pm Intersection: Country Club/Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort bkgrd total Project ID: 0190' East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 1 1 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ) 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 1 45 0.85 0.85 1 52 2 2 0 0 No 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 ) 7 8 9 ) 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 17 53 C(m) (vph) 1620 1078 v/c 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.03 0.15 Control Delay 7.2 8.5 LOS A A Approach Delay 8.5 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized. Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Michael 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/,�15/'02 Analysis Time Period: am V Intersection: Country Club/Street 11 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent Ehort bkgrd<iotal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 11 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 15 45 25 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 52 29 1- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach E$ Movement 1 Lane Config L v (vph) 17 C(m) (vph) 1583 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.03 Control Delay 7.3 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS . i 1 5 0.85 0.85 1 5 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 I I LR HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1001 0.01 0.02 8.6 A 8.6 A TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Country Club/Street 5 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or bkgr otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road' North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments I Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 95 60 30 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ill 70 35 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 L T TR 'Configuration Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 'Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L v (vph) ill C(m) (vph) 1575 v/c 0.07 95% queue length 0.23 Control Delay 7.5 _ LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 Queue Length, and Level WB Northbound 4 1 7 8 9 0.85 1 2 N 0.85 64 2 0 No 0 LR of Service Southbound 10 11 12 I LR HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c IMichael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich,.P.E. 65 1027 0.06 0.20 8.7 A 8.7 A -/ I HCS2000: Unsi.gnalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: ountry Club/Street 5 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort bkgrd ota Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs):. 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 25 20 55 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 23 64 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 90 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 105 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 29 106 C(m) (vph) 1537 998 v/c 0.02 0.11 95% queue length 0.06 0.36 Control Delay 7.4 9.0 LOS I A A Approach Delay, 9.0 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am 'Intersection: Country Club/Street 10 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 10 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 25 155 85 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 182 99 1- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L v (vph) 29 C(m) (vph) 1493 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 Control Delay 7.5 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS ■ i C Queue Length, and Level of WB Northbound 4 1 7 8 9 0.85 0.85 1 17 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 1 LR ' H6S2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 934 0.02 0.06 8.9 A 8.9 A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period:(aa>pm Intersection: Country Club/Street 10 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins , Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hort bkgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road ' North/South Street: Street 10 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments , Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R ' 145 1 Volume 5 45 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 52 170 1 , Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Southbound , Minor Street: Approach Northbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12. L T R 1 L T R 1 20 ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 ' Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage ' RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 , Lane Config L 1 1 LR 24 v (vph) 5 C(m) (vph) 1406 ' 868 v/c 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01, 0.09 Control Delay 7.6 9.3 LOS A A , Approach Delay 9.3 Approach LOS A , HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. .?4. •HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/,�15l/02 Analysis Time Period: amc� 1 Intersection: Country Club/Street 7 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hor bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road North/South Street: Street 7 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2. 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 25 180 100 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate,•HFR 29 211 117 1 ..Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median-Type TWLTL RT Cpannelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R ' Volume 1 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 Lane Config L I 0 0 LR of Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 1 LR (vph) 29 18 'v C(m) (vph) 1470 911 v/c 0.02 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 0.06 Delay 7.5 9.0 'Control LOS A A Approach Delay 9.0 Approach LOS A . ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ,7 -z� Analyst: Michael Inter.: CR11/Country Club Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: Period: 10/15/02 am(o) Jurisd: Year Fort Collins recent ort bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Country Club N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY, I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 No. Lanes I i I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 I 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L T R i Volume 1460 90 105 165 50 1 1170 480 115 11 300 310 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 IRTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A A I NB Left A P Thru A A I Thru P Right A A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A A ( SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A - I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A A I WB Right Green 6.0 6.0 24.0 6.0 44.0 Yellow 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Intersection Performance Summary_ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Eastbound L 520 1770 0.97 0.39 63.8 E TR 514 1713 0.42 0.30 28.5 C fWestbound L 415 1770 0.18 0.32 24.4 C TR 446 1858 0.13 0.24 30.0 C Northbound L 455 1770 0 TR 796 1809 0 Southbound L 201 1770 0 T 820 1863 0 R 997 1583 0 Intersection Delay = .44 0.53 14.3 .88 0.44 38.8 .00 0.53 17.4 .43 0.44 21.0 .37 0.63 9.1 33.5 (sec/veh) B D Length: 100.0 secs Approach Delay LOS 53.3 D 26.8 C 33.4 C B C 15.0 B A Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich 'Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 . E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS q( Analyst: Michael Inter.: CR11/Country Club Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: APPm Year recent ort bkgrd tots Project rb: 0190 E/W St: Country Club N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R i No. Lanes I I 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 0 I I 1 1 I 1 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L T R I Volume 1185 25 145 1105 80 1 190 185 35 11 430 420 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right __P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right Green 6.0 28.0 6.0 46.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS L 448 1770 TR 455 1624 Westbound L .371 1770 TR 521 1860 Northbound L 363 1770, TR 837 1819 Southbound L 558 1770 T 857 1863 R 902. 1583 Intersection Delay = 0.49 0.37 25.6 C 0.44 0.28 30.2 C 27.8 C 0.33 0.37 22.3 C 0.18` 0.28 27.5 C 24.6 C 0.29 0.55 13.8 B 0.31 0.46 18.0 B 16.7 B 0.00 0.55 10.5 B 0.59 0.46 23.0 C 18.6 B 0.55 0.57 14.1 B 20.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. , 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 , E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 10 1 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Michael 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am® Intersection: Mtn Vista/CR9 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: CR9 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 100 220 380 115 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 'Peak Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 113 250 447 135 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 i 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0 0.89 0.89 78 73 2 2 0 No 1 1 L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 951 queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay . Approach LOS ■ 992 392 612 0.11 0.20 0.12 0.38 0.73 0.40 9.1 16.5 11.7 A C B 14.1 B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Matthew J. Delich Delich, P.E. l0 HCS2000: Unsignalized.Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J..Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: to Vista/CR9 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or bkgrd tots Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: CR9 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 55 355 185 45 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 63 412 217 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 145 115 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 166 132 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 63 166 132 C(m) (vph) 1295 454 823 v/c 0.05 0.37 0.16 95% queue length 0.15 1.65 0.57 Control Delay 7.9 17.4 10.2 LOS A C B Approach Delay 14.2 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. io nG Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J Date: 10/15/02 Period: am(J�B> Project ID: 0190 1 E/W St: Mountain Inter.: Mtn Vista/Timberline Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent shor bkgr total Vista NIS St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 .0 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 1 'LGConfig I T R( L T I L R I I Volume I 165 280 1200 290 1480 175 1 I Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 I RTOR Vol I 0 1 1 0 I I 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 1 EB Left 1 NB Left A Thru P 1 Thru Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X 1 WB Left A P 1 SB Left Thru A P I Thru Right 1 Right Peds X 1 Peds X 1 NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right 1 WB Right Green 6.0 45.0 37.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 1 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 1 T 838 1863 0.23 0.45 17.5 B 7.2 A R 1377 1583 0.24 0.87 1.2 A Westbound L 551 1 1770 0.43 0.53 16.4 B T 987 1863 0.35 0.53 13.7 B 14.8 B 1 Northbound L 673 1770 0.84 0.38 37.5 R 760 1583 0.27 0.48 15.7 1 Southbound Intersection Delay = 19.7 (sec/veh) D 31.7 C B Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c 1 Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive 1 Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 1 E-Mail: 970-669-2061 mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Inter.: Mtn Vista/Timberline Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: Qpm Year recent or bkgrd ota Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Mountain Vista N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes I I I I I I 0 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 I LGConfig I T R I L T I L R I I Volume I 280 460 1175 120 1175 100 I I Lane Width I 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I I RTOR Vol I 0 1 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X WB Left A P I SB Left Thru A P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 6.0 47.0 35.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound T 876 R 1377 Westbound L 489 T 1025 Northbound L 637 1863 0.36 0.47 18.0 B 7.7 A 1583 0.37 0.87 1.4 A 1770 0.42 0.55 13.1 B 1863 0.14 0.55 11.0 B 12.3 B 1770 0.31 0.36 23.3 C 20.6 C R 728 1583 0.15 0.46 15.8 B Southbound Intersection Delay = 11.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 'Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Date: 10/15/02 Period: am m Project ID: 190 E/W St: Vine Drive ....... ....may. ��...... ........�.,....,.�.,.... _.�_..�.... _ . _„ Inter.: Timberline/Vine Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent <ERbkgrd otal N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I 'No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I LGConfig I LT R I LTR I L TR I L TR I Volume 1155 175 260 165 150 45 1255 380 80 135 240 100 I Lane Width I 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I ' RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type:, All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ,EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X ' NB Right I EB Right A SB Right I WB Right Green 37.0 6.0 45.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate - Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 447 R 760 Westbound LTR 426 Northbound L 431 ' TR 816 Southbound L 338 ' TR 801 1207 1583 1150 1770 1814 0.84 0:37 42.1 D 31.0 C 0.39 0.48 16.9 B 0.72 0.37 32.7 C 32.7 C 0.67 0.54 25.2 C 0.64 0.45 25.1 C 25.2 C 1770 0.12 0.54 13.7 B 1780 0.50 0.45 21.7 C 21.0 C Intersection Delay = 27.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C I' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 I i OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: ®pm Year recent Ch_orb bkgrd ota Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 I 1 0 1 0 I 1 1 1 0 I I 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I LT R I LTR I L TR I L TR I Volume 155 145 225 190 170 20 1250 170 80 145 355 150 I Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left A P Thru A I Thru P Right A - - - 1 Right P - -- Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right A SB Right 1 WB Right Green 32.0 6.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 492 1536 0.44 0.32 27.6 C 23.3 C R 681 1583 0.36 0.43 19.5 B Westbound LTR 389 1217 0.75 0.32 38.4 D 38.4 D Northbound L 349 1770 0.84 0.59 42.0 D TR 887 1773 0.33 0.50 16.0 B 29.0 C Southbound L 581 1770 0.09 0.59 9.2 A TR 890 1780 0.67 0.50 22.7 C 21.6 C Intersection Delay = 26.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay Ramp/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am 4 or Year recent bkgr total Project ID• 190 E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Lemay Avenue (Ramp) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION_SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 I 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 I LGConfig I L T I T R I I L R I Volume 1175 340 I 245 305 1 1310 95 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 I 0 I I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left Thru A P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X WB Left I SB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A Green 6.0 48.0 34.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 537 1770 0.38 0.57 11.8 B T 1043 1163 0.38 0.56 12.6 B 12.3 B iWestbound T 894 1163 0.32 0.48 16.9 B 8.2 A 'R 1377 1583 0.26 0.87 1.2 A Northbound ' Southbound L 619 1770 0.59 0.35 28.1 C 25.4 C ' R 712 1583 0.16 0.45 16.4 B Intersection Delay = 14.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B I' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 I, Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 I 1 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS &3 'Agency: Matthew J. Date: 10/15/02 Period: am Project IDpm: 190 E/W St: Vine Drive • jr L Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent or bkgrd otal (Ramp) N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I ( I I I I No. Lanes I 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig I.., I L R I T R I L T I 'Volume I 1165 315 I 970 210 1195 610 I Lane Width 1 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol I 1 0 1 0 1 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB' Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds X Peds X ' WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right A - -- EB Right -_ 'SB Right I WB Right A Green 33.0 7.0 48.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 602 1770 0.32 0.34 R 712 1583 0.52 0.45 Northbound ' T 1699 3539 0.64 0.48 R 1361 1583 0.17 0.86 Southbound L 268 1770 0.85 0.58 T 2017 3539 0.36 0.57 24.8 C 21.9 C 20.5 C 21.4 C 17.8 B 1.2 A 38.3 D 11.7 B 18.1 B Intersection Delay = 18.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c 'Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com In- Fax: 970-669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ' 0( Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: lkl5/02 Period: a pm Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive (Ramp) Inter.: Lemay/Vine Ramp Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent <s or Jokgrd<Eotal N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes I I 1 0 0 0 I 1` 0 1 I 1 0 2 1 I I I 1 2 0 I LGConfig I I L R I T R I L T 1 Volume I 1205 165 1 335 75 1270 815 1 Lane Width I 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 1 0 1 0 1 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left 1 NB Left Thru 1 Thru P Right 1 Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru 1 Thru A P Right A 1 Right - Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 34.0 6.0 48.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 619 1770 0.38 0.35 24.7 C 21.4 C R 712 1583 0.26 0.45 17.4 B Northbound T 1699 .3539 0.21 0.48 15.3 B 12.6 B R 1377 1583 0.06 0.87 0.9 A Southbound L 570 1770 0.55 0.57 16.1 B T 1982 3539 0.48 0.56 13.4 B 14.1 B Intersection Delay = 15.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections_Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX E 1 II 11 55 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: CR5 /Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor kgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 1 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 120 25 40 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 141 29 47 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 . -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L C Queue Length, and Level WB Northbound 4 1 7 8 9 0.85 0.85 11 ill 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR of Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 1 LR v (vph) 141 122 C(m) (vph) 1538 952 v/c 0.09 0.13 95% queue length 0.30 0.44 Control Delay 7.6 9.3 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.3 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 5� BCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: a pm 'Intersection: 52/Street 1 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street,: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 1 ' Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound ' Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 75 [0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 64 29 -_ Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration L T. Upstream Signal? No 0.85 0.85 29 5- 1 0 TR No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10, 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes . Configuration I 0.85 0.85 11 135 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) C(m) (vph) 64 1578 146 1012 v/c 0.04 0.14 95$ queue length Control Delay 0.13 7.4 0.50 9.2 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.2 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. ' Matthew J. Delich Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: a Intersection: CR /Street 3 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hor kgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 3 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and.Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 25 140 130 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 164 152 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type. TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8. 9 .1 .10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L Queue Length, and Level of WB Northbound 4 1 7 8 9 0 0 LR Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 1 LR v (vph) 29 16 C(m) (vph) 1416 799 v/c 0.02 0.02 95% queue length 0.06 0.06 Control Delay 7.6 9.6 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.6 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release.4.lc Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. J /r HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: R52/Street 3 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hor kgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 3 ' Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): .0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 10 75 135 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 88 158 5- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (B) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config L Cs: Queue Length, and Level WB Northbound 4 1 7 8 9 5 20 0.85 0.85 5 23 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR of Service Southbound I 10 11 12 I LR v (vph) 11 28 C(m) (vph) 1416 853 v/c 0.01 0.03 958 queue length 0.02 0.10 Delay 7.6 9.4 'Control LOS A A Approach Delay 9.4 Approach LOS A ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4. lc . Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �j S.. RCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY , Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: CRP/Street 5 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hor kgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) ' North/South Street: Street 5 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ' Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R ' Volume 65 160 130 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 ' 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 76 188 152 11 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? - - - ------ -- -- Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound ' Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 30 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 , Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage ' RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR t Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 76 40 C(m) (vph) 1416 829 ' v/c . 0.05 0.05 95% queue length 0.17 0.15 Control Delay .7.7 9.6 LOS A A ' Approach Delay 9.6 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' 4 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: CR52/Street 6 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent ort kgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 6 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 15 220 155 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 258 182 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume 5 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I LR v (vph) 17 16 C(m) (vph) 1387 760 v/c 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.04 0.06 Control Delay 7.6 9.8 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.8 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ' Matthew J. Delich, P.E. G� v ' ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: m pm Intersection: 52/Street 6 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent hor bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: Street 6 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 90 195 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 105 229 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? — - - - --- - -- -- Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR Upstream Signal? No No I ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes . Configuration 181 Delay, -Queue Length, and Level Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 Lane Config L I 0.85 0.85 5 17 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR of Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 1 LR v (vph) 5 22 C(m) (vph) 1333 774 v/c 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.09 Control Delay 7.7 9.8 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.8 Approach LOS A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 7 Analyst: Michael Inter.: CR11/CR52 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am(g) Year recent sho kgr total Project ID: 0190 E/W St: CR52 N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 15 1 35 1160 1 5 160 435 230 15 300 5 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0.12.0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0_ 1 0 I 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 RightP Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right. Green 36.0 54.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS zastbouna L 505 1365 0.01 0.37 19.9 B TR 572 1590 0.07 0.36 21.1 C 20.9 C Westbound L 489 1322 0.38 0.37 23.6 C TR 584 1623 0.01 0.36 20.6 C 23.5 C Northbound L 501 911 0.14 0.55 11.6 B TR 954 1766 0.82 0.54 26.9t."C 25.6 C Southbound L 162 295 0.04 0.55 10.8 B TR 1003 1858 0.34 0.54 13.9 B 13.8 B Intersection Delay = 22.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS `Jm 'Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J Date: pm 2 'Period: m pm Project 0190 E/W St: CR52 11 Inter.: CR11/CR52 Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collins Year : recent ort kgrd total N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 I L T R I I L T R I I L I T R I L T R I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR 1 Volume 110 1 55 1205 1 5 125 195 90 15 400 5 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1, 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right. SB Right I WB Right 'Green 38.0 52.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity. (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 533 1367 0.02 0.39 18.8 B TR 603 1588 0.11 0.38 20.1 C 19.9 B Westbound L 505 1296 0.48 0.39 23.6 C TR 617 1623 0.01 0.38 19.3 B 23.5 C Northbound L 363 684 0.08 0.53 12.0 B 'TR 922 1774 0.36 0.52 15.3 B 15.0 B Southbound L 479 904 0.01 0.53 11.2 B ' TR 967 1859 0.49 0.52 17.3 B 17.2 B Intersection Delay = 18.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 . r OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 4.1 Analyst: Michael Inter.: CRIl/Country Club Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am (0> Year recent shor bkgr total Project ID: 0212 E/W St: Country Club N/S St: CR11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I I I I 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 I 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 LGConfig I L R I I L T I T R I Volume 1370 105 I 1170 360 I 235 260 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 I 1 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Peds X 1 Peds X WB Left I SB Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right Green 36.0 6.0 46.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 655 1770 0.62 0.37- 27.6 C 24.9 C R 744 1583 0.15 0.47 15.2 B Westbound Northbound L 518 1770 0.39 0.55 12.8 B T 1006 1863 0.42 0.54 14.0 B 13.6 B Southbound T 857 1863 0.32 0.46 18.1 B 9.2 A R 1377 1583 0.22 0.87 1.1 A Intersection Delay = 15.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c , Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. t 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 4� 1 .............. ... .,.may. ..�-....._ �.. _.._,..._..-.. ___ _.______ ____ 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: CR11/Country Club Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins am pm q. Year recent s or kgr total 'Period: Project 0212 E/W St: Country Club N/S St: CR11 No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width ' RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I 1 I 1 0 1 1 0 I 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 I 1 I L R I I L T I T R I 1160 145 1 190 150 1 325 340 I 112.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 I 1 0 1 1 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: Ali other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 EB Left A I NB Left A P Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Peds X I Peds X WB Left I SB Left Thru I Thru P Right Right - -- P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right 34.0 6.0 48.0 'Green Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate . Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 619 1770 0.30 0.35 23.9 C 20.7 C 'R 712 1583 0.24 0.45 17.1 B Westbound Northbound L 474 1770 0.22 0.57 11.3 B 1043 1863 0.17 0.56 10.8 B 11.0 B 'T Southbound 894 1863 0.43 0.48 18.5 B 9.7 A 'T R 1377 1583 0.29 0.87 1.2 A Intersection Delay = 12.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B I, HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-503.4 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.': Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: Mtn ista/CR9 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent <22<bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: CR9 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 100 195 335 90 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 113 221 394 105 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume SS 65 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 61 73 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service - Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I I L R v (vph) 113 61 73 C(m) (vph) 1065 419 655 v/c 0.11 0.15 0.11 95% queue length 0.36 0.51 0.37 Control Delay 8.8 15.1 11.2 LOS A C B Approach Delay 12.9 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. �t• L� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 1 15/02 Analysis Time Period: am m 'Intersection: to Vista/CR9 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins S C t Units. U. us omary Analysis Year: recent shor kgrd otal Project ID: 019.0 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: CR9 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 55 315 170 35 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 63 366 199 41 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- Median Type TWLTL Channelized? No 'RT Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T- R I L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0.87 0.87 143 132 2 2 0 0 No 1 1 L R ■ Delay, Queue Length, and Level Approach EB WB Northbound Movement 1 4 1 7 6 9 Lane Config L I of Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 I L R. (vph) 63 143 132 'v C(m) (vph) 1327 481 842 v/c 0.05 0.30 0.16 95% queue length 0.15 1.23 0.55 Control Delay 7.8 15.6 10.1 LOS A C B Approach Delay 13.0 Approach LOS B ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Delich Delich, P.E. 4t 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Mtn Vista/Timberline Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Co'ns llor Qpm Year recent bkgrd total 'Period: Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Mountain Vista N/S St: Timberline Road ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I i I 'No. Lanes I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 I LGConfig I TR I LT I LR I I Volume I 240 285 1175 105 1120 100 I I Lane Width I 12.0 I 12.0 I 12.0 I I ' RTOR Vol I 0 I I 0 i I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X WB Left P I SB Left Thru P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 58.0 32.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _ Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 1001 ' Westbound LT 448 Northbound 1726 0.58 0.58 773 0.74 0.58 15.8 B 15.8 B 25.7 C 25.7 C LR 545 1702 0.45 0.32 27.6 C 27.6 C Southbound Intersection Delay = 21.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 11 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 11 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pi' Intersection: Mtn Vista/Timberline Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short kgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 140 175 200 245 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 164 205 235 288 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? - - - - Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume za5 ii5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 335 205 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L 1 L R I v (vph) 235 335 205 C(m) (vph) 1190 306 773 v/c 0.20 1.09 0.27 95% queue length 0.73 13.17 1.07 Control Delay 8.8 117.1 11.3 LOS A F B Approach Delay 77.0 Approach LOS F HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 42- HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: n Vista/Timberline Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent or kgr total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 240 285 175 105 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 266 316 205 123 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 120 100 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 134 112 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? ' RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Storage Delay, 'Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS No 1 1 L R Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L I L R I 205 134 112 992 348 630 0.21 0.39 0.18 0.78 1.76 0.64 9.6 21.7 11.9 A C B 17.2 C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael Matthew P. Delich J. Delich, P.E. 11l.JLVVV• Jiyla411s.�v aa...vrv�.v ��...... ....-.. .. Analyst: Michael Inter.: Timberline/Vine ' Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: a�p Year recent qOEDkgr total Project ID:-0190 ' E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Timberline Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I , I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 I LGConfig I LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR I Volume 170 175 260 165 150 25 1255 145 80 120 195 55 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 1 12.0 I 12.0 I 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds X t WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 40.0 50.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 , All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ' Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound LTR 630 1574 0.91 0.40 45.9 D 45.9 D ' Westbound LTR 500 1250 0.56 0.40 24.7 C 24.7 C ' Northbound LTR 581 1162 0.94 0.50 48.7 D 48.7 D ' Southbound LTR 855 1709 0.37 0.50 16.6 B 16.6 B ' Intersection Delay = 37.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS D ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. , 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 ' E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS , �0 'Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date: 10/15/02 'Period: m pm Project 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive Inter.: Timberline/Vine Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Fort Collin Year : recent ort kgr otal NIS St: Timberline Road ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I tNo. Lanes I 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 LGConfig I LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR I Volume 130 145 225 190 170 15 1250 145 80 125 275 75 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 I 12.0 1 12.0 I 12.0 I ' RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right 'Green 32.0 58.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 521 1653 0.82 0.32 41.7 D 41.7 D Westbound LTR 340 1061 0.84 0.32 49.1 D 49.1 D Northbound ' LTR 622 10'73 0.90 0.58 36.7 D 36.7 D Southbound ' LTR 995 1716 0.44 0.58 13.3 B 13.3 B Intersection Delay = 34.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Michael P. Matthew J. 2272 Glen Loveland, HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Delich Delich, P.E. Haven Drive CO 80538 I'Phone: 970-669-2061 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay Ramp/Vine , Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am®m Year recent or kgr total Project ID: 0190 ' E/W St: Vine Drive NIS St: Lemay Avenue (Ramp) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I , I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 I I I 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 I 1 0 1 1 LGConfig I L T I T R I I L R I ' Volume 1125 255 I 200 305 1 1310 70 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 I 0 I I 0 I ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 , EB Left A P I NB Left Thru A P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X ' WB Left I SB Left A Thru P i Thru Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X ' NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A Green 6.0 48.0 34.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 ' All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ' Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 577 1770 0.25 0.57 10.9 B T 1043 1863 0.29 0.56 11.7 B 11.4 B Westbound ' T 894 1863 0.26 0.48 16.2 B 7.1 A R 1377 1583 0.26 0.87 1.2 A Northbound ' Southbound L 619 1770 0.59 0.35 28.1 C 25.9 C R 712 1583 0.12 0.45 16.0 B ' Intersection Delay = 14.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B , HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive , Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 , E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSSISS U ' 'Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay Ramp/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period:.(!�pm Year recent short bkgrd otal Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Lemay Avenue (Ramp) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 I 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 LGConfig I L T I T R I I L R I Volume 185 160 I 230 270 1 1210 90 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 I 0 1 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P I NB Left Thru A P I Thru Right I Right Peds X I Peds X WB Left I SB Left A Thru P I Thru Right P I Right A Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right A Green 6.0 48.0 34.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group. Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 557 1770 0.18 0.57 10.6 B T 1043 1863 0.18 0.56 10.9 B 10.8 B Westbound T 894 1863 0.29 0.48 16.6 B 8.2 A R 1377 1583 0.22 0.87 1.1 A Northbound 1 Southbound , L 619 1770 0.39 0.35 24.9 C 22.3 C ' R 712 1583 0.15 0.45 16.3 B Intersection Delay = 12.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 'Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ' 3� Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay/Vine Ramp Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: amm Year recent shor kgr otal Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive (Ramp) N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I I 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 I 1 0 2 1 I I 1 1 2 0 I LGConfig 1 1 L R I T R I L T 1 Volume I 1165 265 1 860 210 1170 550 1 Lane Width I 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left Thru I Thru P Right I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left A P Thru I Thru A P Right A I Right Peds X 1 Peds X NB Right A I EB Right SB Right I WB Right A Green 34.0 6.0 48.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Westbound L 619 1770 0.31 0.35 24.0 C 21.1 C R 712 1583 0.44 0.45 19.3 B Northbound T 1699 3539 0.57 0.48 20.0- B 16.3 B R 1377 1583 0.17 0.87 1.1 A Southbound L 287 1770 0.70 0.57 20.9 C T 1982 3539 0.33 0.56 11.9 B 14.1 B Intersection Delay = 16.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 36 11 APPENDIX D �I 11 11 n 11 it FIGURE 46, PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT p (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) n. I 70 400 wQ Lu 0 300 CL cn CL o p ,Lu 200 �W AM: /6,0 VP14 0 100 0 h,.- 00111 = 3310 400 500 600 700 800 9 0 100 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH 'NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VO UME FOR A MINOR.STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 PH APPLES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPRPACHINq WITH ONE LANE. 3 3 O N I � � R q6E 0AC K&PcoAl6t lrUAkPAnl7— AT CR i�CZL18 M w FIGURE 4.6, PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT co (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) a.. I = 400 wQ PA1495 vP14 300 CL a. o w 200 z N ,[N:r!t) vPit J p 100 c.� OR MOR •- O- M7 •- 1 E NE LANE 0 =01 n`,V!`' = 3 700 8 0 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH "NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRI SHi LD VOLUME FOR A MINOR. STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LAN S ND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR S RE T APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. C o z 6�01'�i RAA16E 514c<6eou1;ly Gv f 'AIUT �I T Ti,vele4?1-11v 1rV V167W M M M M M M r FIGURE 4-6. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT co (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) CL = 400 wQ CC � 300 CL A (n C n /¢N[ 2OVPN Q :3 pit(: /(oS fPu w 2-07 �_ Jp 100 OR MORE LANES 2 .. MORE �. '.MEN OR ' r� = 3DO 400 500, 600 70C 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTHAPPROACHES CHES - VPH 'NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER T RESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MOREL NES AND 75 VPH APPLI S AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. tioK ► PAA16E, bAC96P-o ulU 6 AJI4 R N4i'J T / i C,21/4 5z I APPENDIX C 11 11 1 1 11 30 Table 4-3 Fort Collins (City Limits) Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) Land Use (from structure plan) Other corridors within: Low density Intersection type Commercial Mixed use mixed use All other corridors districts residential areas Signalized intersections D E' D D (overall) Any Leg E E D E Any Movement E E D E Stop sign control N/A F" F" E (arterial/collector or local — any approach leg Stop sign control N/A C C C (collector/local—any approach leg) ` mitigating measures required " considered normal in an urban environment UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay seclveh A _< 10 B >10and <15 C > 15 and _< 25 D > 25 and < 35 E >35and <<50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay seclveh A _< 10 B > 10 and _< 20 C > 20 and _< 35. D > 35 and _< 55 E > 55 and < 80 F > 80 ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am/ x 'Intersection: CR1 //CR52 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S.-,Customary Analysis Year: recen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 7 73 5 0 43 0 -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 'Peak Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 85 5- 0 47 0- Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7. 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ' Volume 10 0 2 0 0 3 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 0 2 0 0 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ' Configuration LTR LTR IlLane Approach Movement Config Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ,Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LTR LTR 1 LTR 1 LTR v (vph) 8 0 13 3 C(m) (vph) 1560 1505 830 1022 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 95% queue length 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.01 Control Delay 7.3 7.4 9.4 8.5 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.4 8.5 _Approach LOS A A ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 27 RCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: quDpm Intersection: ll/CR52 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: CR52 (Richard's Lake) North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 7 50 2 1 78 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 58 2 1 91 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles -. 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median,Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 6 0 1 5 0 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR ..7 0 1 5 0 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Approach NB Movement 1 Lane Config LTR 0 1 0 LTR - Queue Length, and Level SB Westbound 4 I 7 8 9 LTR I LTR 0 1 0 LTR of Service Eastbound I 10 11 12 1 LTR v (vph) 8 1 8 13 C(m) (vph) 1498 1544 801 886 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.04 Control Delay 7.4 7.3 9.5 9.1 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.5 9.1 Approach LOS A. A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. z v ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release'4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Intersection: 'CRI/Country Club Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Country Club Road (CR50E) North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS ' Vehicle Major Street: Approach Movement 1 Study period (hrs): 0.25 Volumes and Adjustments Northbound Southbound 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 146 65 40 39 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 171 76 47 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type Undivided Channelized? 'RT Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R ' Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ($) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration co 0.91 0.91 37 98 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR a Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 'Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 11 LR v (vph) 171 135 C(m) (vph) 1503 767 v/c 0.11 0.18 95% queue length 0.38 0.64 Delay 7.7 10.7 'Control LOS A B Approach Delay 10.7 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich ,Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY' ""` Analyst: Michael ' Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm ' Intersection: ll/Country Club Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 ' East/West Street: Country Club Road (CR50E) North/South Street: CR11 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 , L T R I L T R Volume 76 31 61 39 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 89 36 71 45 ' Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 ' Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound , Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 26 123 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 30 144 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 , Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage. No RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR , Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' Lane Config LT I I LR v (vph) 89 174 C(m) (vph) 1473 887 ' v/c 0.06 0.20 95% queue length 0.19 0.73 Control Delay 7.6 10.0+ LOS A B , Approach Delay 10.0+ Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P..Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROf SUMMARY 'Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.,: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm 'Intersection: Mtn ista/CR9 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: CR9 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 ' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 84 89 168 46 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 95 101 197 54 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type Undivided Channelized? 'RT Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1. L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (8) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes ' Configuration Delay, 'Approach EB Movement 1 Lane Config LT (vph) 95 ,v C(m) (vph) 1314 v/c 0.07 95% queue length 0.23 Control Delay 8.0 LOS A Approach Delay _Approach LOS 111 0.89 0.89 32 59 2 2 0 No 0 0 LR Queue Length, and Level of Service WB Northbound Southbound 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 1 1 LR HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4,1c 656 0.14 0.48 11.4 B 11.4 B Michael P. 'Matthew J. Delich Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: Q pm Intersection: Mtn Vista/CR9 Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: CR9 Intersection Orientation: EW Study.period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 44 163 100 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 51 189 117 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? - -- -- -- — -- Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R volume uU yi Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 91 ill Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade M 0_ 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 :j . ,7 " 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I I LR v (vph) 51 202 C(m) (vph) 1451 723 v/c 0.04 0.28 95% queue length 0.11 1.14 Control Delay 7.6 11.9 LOS A B Approach Delay 11.9 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2 Z. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Michael 'Analyst: Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am m Mtn Vista/Timberline 'Intersection: Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: ecen short bkgrd total 11 [I 11 Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 63 75 139 123 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 74 88 163 144 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R .1 L T R ' Volume 126 128 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 148 150 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade ($) 10 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach:. Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level Approach EB WB Northbound 'Movement 1 4 1, 7 "8 9 Lane Config LT I- LR (vph) 163 298 'v C(m) (vph) 1417 578 v/c 0.12 0.52 95% queue length 0.39 2.95 Control Delay 7.9 17.7 LOS A C Approach Delay 17.7 Approach LOS C „ r of Service Southbound 1 10 11 12 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. ' Matthew J. Delich Delich, P.E. 2( HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: to Vista/Timberline Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen short bkgrd'total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Mountain Vista North/South Street: Timberline Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 128 143 137 54 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 142 158 161 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 53 54 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 59 60 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I v (vph) 161 119 C(m) (vph) 1261 540 v/c 0.13 0.22 95% queue length 0.44 0.83 Control Delay 8.3 13.5 LOS A B Approach Delay 13.5 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. , hd, final value 5.74 6.13 5.69 x, final value 0.49 0.32 0.61 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.7 4.1 3.7 ' Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 305 188 386 Service Time 3.7 4.1 3.7 Utilization, x 0.49 0.32 0.61 Dep. headway, hd 5.74 6.13 5.69 Capacity 555 438 602 Delay 14.04 11.98 17.19 LOS B B C ' Approach: Delay 14.04 LOS B ' Intersection Delay 14.42 6.02 0.23 2.0 4.0 Southbound L1 L2 136 4.0 0.23 6.02 386 10.79 B 11.98 17.19 10.79 B C B Intersection LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c ' Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 ' Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com , ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ' Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: Timberline/Vine ' Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 ' East/West Street:. Vine Drive North/South Street: Timberline Road Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound. I Southbound I ' I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 149 135 86 131 122 8 1139 153 50 14 76 37 1 % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.88 0.85 0.88 0.85 ' Flow Rate 305 188 386 136 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 , Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. ' Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 305 188 386 136 ' Left -Turn 55 36 157 4 Right -Turn 97 9 56 43 Prop. Left -Turns 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 Prop. Right -Turns 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 , Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: ' hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 - 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed -0.1 0.0 0.0 -0.1 ' Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 305 188 386 136 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 1 hd,�final yvalue 'x, final value Move -up time, Service Time 5.46 5.92 5.86 0.45 0.35 0.36 m 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.5 3.9 3.9 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound ' L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 295 214 219 Service Time 3.5 3.9 3.9 Utilization, x 0.45 0.35 0.36 Dep. headway, hd 5.46 5.92 5.86 Capacity 545 464 469 Delay 12.81 12.10 12.07 LOS B B B ' Approach: Delay 12.81 LOS B ' Intersection Delay 12.37 5.71 0.39 2.0 3.7 Southbound L1 L2 247 3.7 0.39 5.71 497 12.33 B 12.10 12.07 12.33 B B B Intersection LOS B I? HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E.. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Agency/Co.: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 10/15/02 Analysis Time Period: dim Intersection: Timberline/Vine Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 East/West Street: Vine Drive North/South Street: Timberline Road Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I Volume 121 118 134 170 130 7 188 57 42 Ill 146 55 1 % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound L1 L2 Configuration LTR PHF 0.92 Flow Rate 295 % Heavy Veh 2 No. Lanes 1 Opposing -Lanes 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 Geometry group 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 LTR LTR LTR 0.96 0.85 0.85 214 219 247 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 295 Left -Turn 22 Right -Turn 145 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.5 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 Geometry Group 1 Adjustments Exhibit 17-33: hLT-adj 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 hadj, computed -0.2 Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 214 219 247 72 103 12 7 49 64 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.1 -0.0 -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 295 214 219 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 1( Southbound L1 L2 ' 247 3.20 3.20 1 Analyst: Michael Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E Date: 10/15/02 tPeriod: am Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive Inter.: Lemay/Vine Area Type: All other Jurisd: Fort Collins Year ecen short NIS St: Lemay Avenue areas bkgrd total ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I' Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes i 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I LGConfig I LTR I LTR I LTR I LTR 1 Volume 139 165 65 136 139 167 144 618 57 1103 398 16 1 Lane Width I 12.0 I 12.0 ( 12.0 I 12.0 I ' RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A I SB Left P Thru A I Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X I Peds 7{ NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 34.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary 'Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 532 Lestbound LTR 554 Northbound 1566 0.59 0.34 29.1 C 1629 0.73 0.34 33.6 C LTR 966 1725 �Southbound 'LTR 708 1265 Intersection Delay = 29.1 C 33.6 C 0.84 0.56 26.7 C 26.7 C 0.86 0.56 31.5 C 31.5 C 29.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich atthew J. Delich, P.E. 272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 -Mail: mdelich@frii.com Fax: 970-669-5034 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS t f' ♦ice. ue..uvu. u�y• ..a .�...... Analyst: Michael Inter.: Lemay/Vine Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/15/02 Jurisd: Fort Collins Period: am Pm Year ecen short bkgrd total Project ID: 0190 E/W St: Vine Drive N/S St: Lemay Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 LGConfig I LTR 1 LTR I LTR 1 LTR I Volume 113 114 58 150 150 88 126 216 19 1128 511 51 1 Lane Width 1 12.0 I 12.0 I 12.0 1 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A 1 Right P Peds X I Peds X WB Left A 1 SB Left P Thru A 1 Thru P Right A I Right P Peds X ( Peds X NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 34.0 56.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS LTR 587 1726 0.37 0.34 25.3 C 25.3 C Westbound LTR 554 1629 0.59 0.34 28.9 C 28.9 C Northbound LTR 926 1654 0.29 0.56 12.4 B 12.4 B Southbound LTR 903 1613 0.89 0.56 31.9 C 31.9 C Intersection Delay _ 27.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Michael P. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 Fax: 970-669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX B 13 MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE 8 LOVELAND, CO 80 P.E. 538 0 9 0 1 Phone: E97606 .2 6 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 1.29-02 Observer: City of Fort Collins Day: Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Intersection: Lemay/Vine R = right turn S = straight L = left turn Time Northbound: Lemay Southbound: Lemay Total Eastbound: Vine Westbound: Vine Total Total Begins L S R Total L S R Total northisouth L S I R Total L I S R Total eastfwest All 7:30 9 53 5 36 50 U 267 2 28 9 13 45 23 120 9 - 39 134 14 255 1 15 37 41 22 30 146 401 7,. 9 50 31 139 15 250 2 24 116 9 36 13 100 8:00 5 56 8:15 3 _L4 1 5 7 22 88 . 8 179 8 21 13 32 22 107 261 110 185 288 473 142' 7:30-8:30 PHFd 0.96 0.88 0.72 0.88 4:30 il 1153 13 34 131 9 351 11 31 17 10 35 44 148 4 260 8 141 7 7 42 31 136 396 4.45 9 1125 8 8 25 90 3 32 9 12 38 53 '186 5: 00 9 174 119 19 25 100 2 1166 98 296 7 141 15 17 19 77 2 4:30-5:30 719 4 3 5 17 3 42 6111 PH, 0.89 0.74 6.81 0.83 M IM IM =1 = = = = = = = MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN 13111V�JE LOVELLAND, CO 80538 Phone: 970 669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 9-18-02 Observer: Harry Day: Wednesda Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: CRI1t'CR52 S = straight L f IeH IUM Time Northbound: CRII Southbound: CRII Total Eastbound: CR52 Westbound: CR52 Total Total ::L=R Total L 8 1 R Total L S R Total L S R Total Begins northisouth eas9west All 7:00 1 9 1— 0 14 1 1 26 0 0 0 7:15 1 15 0 16 0 35 0 0 3 1 0 0 1, 4 7:30 0 1 4 2 0 22 0 28 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 7:45 0 11 1 0 1 25 1 38 1 0 1 1 1. A -2 0 0 4 42 8:0 0 2 1 10 1 2 14 i 1, 0 18 3 35 2 0 1 3 0 0. 1.,. —F--- 6 --T---- 4 IN 8:15 0 24' '- Z, 0 2`1 1 46 1 0 1 0 o ro T— #42A0 9 0 0 0 14 0 24 0 2 o Fi 1 12 1 1 *4 0 12 1 :4 7� '37 0 F7-.45-845 1 59 84 143 12 7 19 1 PHF 0.61 0.78 0.6 0.44 4:00 0 15 0 0 8 23 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 2 6: 4:115 0 16 1 0 12 0 29 0 0 1 4 0 1 5 6 35 4: 30 2 13 0 0 8 0 23 0 0 4 4 0 0 8 31 4:45 0 23 0 23 0 10 0 10 33 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 5:00 4 23 1 2 0 9 0 38 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 3 41 0 12 0 28 0 0 2 3 0 1 6 0- 14 2 A4 3 13 1 0 12 0 29 0 0 0 tt, 0 0 4 0 9 0 22 0 0 1 1 24 " 2 2 0 0 3 4�z 4:45-5:45 85 43 128 V, 3 Q],:,v] ., 12 15 PHF 0.73 0.9 1 0.38 j 0.75 O MATTHEW J. DELIC 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 9701669-2061 I TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 9-12-02 Observer: Harry Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: CR111CR50E S = straight L = Ian TUM Time Northbound: CRII Southbound: CRII Total Eastbound: CR50E Westbound: Total Total =L=R Total L 8 R Total L S I R Total L S R Total Begins northisouth eastfwest All 7:00 17 1 4 1 14 8 43 7 1 25 0 32 7:115 19 6 19 11 55 10 23 33 1 7:30 16 8 10 9 43 6 35 41 7:45 20 6 26 19 11 56 8 40 48 8:00 21 11 .:32. 13 8 . ... . 53 2 25 2 27 8:15 20 8 13 3 44 4 23 z % 27 7 8:30 23 5 13 9 22:::�� 50 5 --F22T 1 26 — 0' 31 77j177 8:45 18 6 24 1 7 42 6 _211 . I— 0�.:. 28 7V 71N15 [ T 107 j 100 207 90, [, 0: 1474:� 1 149 0 149 356 I PHIF 0.84 0.83 1 0.78 We 4:00 27 1 14 10 3 '43 54 7 17 -24 J. 24 78 't 4:115 33 1 13 11 5 62 12 21 :0 33 9.5' 4:30 30 1 17 4Z 9 2 1t58 6 18 24 82 4:45 29 15 14 11 69 11 23 34 103 5:00 46 17 79 3 22 25 42 19 77., A 8 22, 83 11 23 11V L_�!() 29 14 7 ?94 59 9 1 22 [7� k:45 28 14 0�' 9 :86 14:45-5:45 1140 1 W] .0 211 0 79 290 34:i[ 0 . [94, 124 0: 0 124 414 I PHIF 0.84 0.79 0.91 n1a FEW MATMEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: 9701669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 9-11.02 Observer: Harry Day: Wednesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn intersection: rimbefline/Mountain Vista S = straight I L = WE IUM Time Northbound: Timberline 11 Southbound: Total Eastbound: Mtn Vista Westbound: Mtn Vista Total Total :E�=R Total L 8 R Total L 5 R Total L S R Total Begins northisouth eastfwest All 7:0 10 11 21I -- 21 28 25 - 33 14 100 qll 7:15 10 1 16 26 38 36 11 36 16 126, IT, T:30 12 10 22 33 42 53 15 7: 45— 16 14 30 0 i 30 31 32 63 26 9 35 98.1288:00 15 14 29 26 33 22 14 3fi. 95 8:15 13 11 24 0 24 20 25 8:30 10 4 24 8 12 107 '.- " "I 0 1 107 -11 271 1 "'. 1 191 462 PHF 0.89 Na 0.9 0,7 4:00 22 1 29 51 13 13 17 19 62 4:15 25 32 57 0 57 13 12 ILL 19 19 22 66 12356 4:30 25 31 14 17 g 29 2 4 84 ,140 1 45 I IN 71 8 20 21 19 68 439 4:45 26 78 13 19 32 24 92 10 5:00 40 38 22 55 55 24 20 57 39 g 140 .......... 15 33 ..... . 37 29 5:30 27 23 5:45 —i5 --T25 50 1 1 18 28 26 87 07, 4:45-5:45 254 0 254 138 [up 262 40 0 PHF 0.81 Na 6.78 0.68 MATTHEW I DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone- 1970) 669-2061 1 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date; 940-02 Observer: Harry Day* Tuesday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins Intersection: CRg/Mountain Vista R = right tum S = straight L = lett tum Time Northbound: Southbound: CR9 Total Eastbound: Mtn Vista Westbound: Mtn Vista Total Total L S R Total L S R Total Begins north1south eastfwest All LT S-TR T Total L S R Total 7:00 19 19 38 38 9139 1 77 19 1 2 ".4 0 69 T.-Y 3 24 1'� 47 47 15 45 1 60 23 3 86 ,133 7:15 23 28 51 51 8 51 59 24 5 88 7:30 22 41 9 38 20 1 8 6 109 7:45 8:00 5 23 36 12 29 41, 33 6 8 0 17 11 28 8 17 18 2 45 �Mwm 8:1 5 E8:3 16 --- 15 31 31 6 28 15 6 55 77W 0 0 8. 45 ."o 14 13 2 7 22 29 15 4 48 [7:15-815 0 1177 V7 11 11'1�"' .1 267 115 322 4" 1 PHIF n/a 0.87 0.86 0.74 4:00 7 17 2 4 18 15 33 35 11 79 1034:115 6 20 26 17 17 38 10 82 9 19 28 28 15 14 29 25 14 68 4:30 6 16 2 2 22 22 36 11 91 4:45 12 23 16 20 .......... 7 34 7 Lr b 41 77 1005-15 5:00 8 11 fi9 19 23 26 49 48 13 110 1295 0= 4 14 k 18 23 21 50 15 �AtXv; 109 '. 30 5Z5 1718 18 �0' ............. 38 12 86 4:415,5:45 0 82 82 04, 89, 0 1173 214 387 PHIF nia T 0.89 6.88 0.82 = = M = = M M = M = = M = M = = M = = R MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE LOVELAND, CO 80538 Phone: (9701669-2061 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Date: 5-16-02 Observer: City of Fort Collins Day: Thursday Jurisdiction: Fort Collins R = right turn Intersection: Timberline/Vine S = straight L = ten TUM Time Begins Northbound: Timberline Southbound: Timberline Total northisouth Eastbound: Vine Westbound: Vine Total east1west Total All L S R Total L 8 R Total L S I R Total L 1 3 1 R Total 100 4 30 40 17 29 2 122 7:30 22 18 10 0 41 9 36 23 �g -1111-Z'��17."' 9 8 7 25 42 15 37 2 128 7:45 23 7 4 5 118 6 32 18 35 1 121 22 '15 20 3 43 15 n� P E 8 3 4 20 29 2 109 1 -1 815 21 17 8 3 26 jo 399 273 207 480 7:30. 8:30 187 PHF 0.82 0.83 0.92 0.96 8 120 9 34 24 g- 7 34 3 4:30 43 37 15 95 1 16 80 8 31 27 8 21 2 97 tiTy 4:45 25 28 7 0 14 6 .9 135 11 313 33 16 5 30 0 95 5: 00 33 43 14 3 0 124 21 17 37 1 9 11 37 3 128 38 45 14 342 4 78 117 459 270 431 4:30-5:30 37 PHIF 0.88 0.65 0.88 0.79 S 'b V VP Attachment "B" Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet Origin Ahkt In tZ (Project Site3Ze, 4 AMIN* WRItr Resrdent<al sw aGotnrt�ex vWer .......... List the pedestrian destinations within i izu, (i.zi mues ior scnoois) or Inc project boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity, types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and security of the selected route(s). 01 6-S i DEA) T ( AL To 7tfGr OG- 5 -r FuruRO 4v5t'b&m—(11qe. To 'rod7- A.)w2-ri-1- Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2,2001 (0 Gravity Model Data-2020 NW-CR64 NE-CR64 SW-Ctry Club SW -Vine S-Lemay S-Timberline E-Mtn Vista E-Vine Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. 61 131 1/2 98 0 55 855 114 138 1/2 145 400 146 1157 112 113 89 319 69 56 1/2 310 12 57 180 144 292 1/2143 1984 1/2143 1984 113 99 1/2 95 878 70 9 313 0 62 117 112106 295 127 294 1/295 878 92 167 88 944 1 /2 71 84 314 1 63 268 107 151 1 /2126 9 213118 1508 90 1424 91 1169 85 121 64 131 1/2 145 400 125 1344 94 1875 97 1857 302 131 1/2 71 84 1/2126 9 124 4393 117 4461 305 2 72 625 142 150 1/3 118 754 93 1220 308 2 84 683 141 1335 112 139 288 121 1933 1/2 310 12 86 186 108 2245 1/2140 838 48 3902 315 6 87 782 1/2 104 121 123 621 132 3907 1/2 104 121 105 2273 82 1206 49 4822 1/2 106 295 102 4311 130 1135 598 33 109 107 101 214 122 128 133 248 110 182 100 88 83 1402 128 244 111 307 65 346 129 3083 605 81 66 210 79 1312 58 1067 80 624 51 92 119 2362 59 431 131 1220 67 579 76 2255 68 560 115 1266 99 272 116 674- - 134 81 120 3321 135 7321 103 494 137 273 138 718 1 /2 139 288 1/2 140 836 136 1672 81 4101 77 656 60 552 51 92 52 121 73 515 53 460 78 1165 74 467 75 710 54 139 50 9 Total Emp, 554 Total Emp. 13 Total Emp, 4,923 Total Emp. 36,249 Total Emp. 30,911 Total Emp. 28,253 Total Emp. 3,660 Total Emp. 3,310 Dismbution 0.56% Distribution 0.01 % Distribution 4.88% Distribution 36.38% Distribution 31.02% Distribution 28.36% Distribution 3.67% DistrIbutton 4.66% N0114 N0141 J74 Zvi /,. Z4-0 i��"O 5� Gravity Model Data-2005 NW-CR64 NE-CR64 SW-Ctry Club SW -Vine S-Lemay S-Timberline E-Mtn Vista E-Vine Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. Zone Emp. 61 80 1/2 98 0 55 417 114 72 112 145 203 146 584 112 97 89 106 69 30 1/2 310 12 57 144 144 118 112143 1603 1/2143 1603 113 31 1/2 95 690 70 11 313 0 62 64 112106 144 127 153 12 95 590 92 70 88 675 11271 60 314 1 63 230 107 94 1/2 126 4 213118 811 90 1155 91 420 85 41 64 124 1/2 145 203 125 1205 94 1196 97 617 302 80 1/271 60 12126 4 124 4022 117 2844 305 1 72 435 142 140 1/3 118 406 93 419 306 0 84 463 141 1299 1/2139 278 121 786 1/2 310 12 86 152 108 1478 12 140 749 48 3494 315 7 87 776 1/2104 94 123 473 132 1550 1/2104 ' 94 105 2105 82 878 49 1852 12 106 144 102 4100 130 1078 598 11 109 46 101 190 122 125 133 119 110 169 100 86 83 1106 128 97 111 111 65 324 129 3091 605 27 66 194 79 1039 58 1040 80 445 51 41 119 1613 59 372 131 622 67 517 76 1457 68 456 115 940 99 245 116 480 134 26 120 1664 135 6605 103 390 137 242 136 504 12 139 278 112140 749 136 1589 81 1817 77 373 60 441 51 41 52 101 73 425 53 251 78 1069 74 185 75 423 54 101 50 4 Total Emp. 322 Total Emp. 13 Total Emp. 3,419 Total Emp. 28,930 Total Emp. 23,634 Total Emp. 15,983 Total Emp. 1,970 Total Emp. 1,791 letttbutlon 0.45% IaNDWon 0.02% Dlstdbution 4.73% Distributlon 40,83% Dlsalbwon 33.360/0 Dlshibwon 22.56% Distnbutlon 2.78% Djambutlon 3.83% A)09 NOM � % 3v�, 2f5l ZG' / 5"/ S/ 4 SITE LOCATION .>ld1LG:I -''.VVV Figure 1 3 4 — Attachments Attachment A Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Information Project Name Gila-eSpla FARK Project Location S C- QoAt�a,u i? A t( Ci %Z S Z TIS Assumptions Type of Study Full: y&.s Intermediate: Apo Study Area Boundaries North: C le g 2 South: V Al East: T•&,ar off. t34 9 West: eglf og Laaay Stud Years y Short Range: zoo cv g-ogvroe, a7- Long Range: 9 as:sr Future Traffic Growth Rate Study Intersections 1. All access drives 5.T-LwmiUi,vb' 2. CP-tt/CP-s Z 6. 3. C (Z 11 (!Duv 7. 4'Time Period for Study &:-'6-.:0 AM: :0 -9: PM: 51 Sat Noon: ,u C) pac T 76-- Trip Generation Rates Trip Adjustment Factors Passby: Captive Nl� Market: Overall Trip Distribution SEE ATTACHED SKETCH Mode Split Assumptions ti Committed Roadway Improvements e I r y Other Traffic Studies L,.v'D 2oPme'ry Areas Requiring Special Study Date: 49cTo B(Z. 2 (I Z4Vt/Z-- Traffic Engineer: Local Entity Engi Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards - Repealed and Reenacted October 1. 2002 Page 4 35 Adopted by Ladmer County, City of Loveland, City of Fort Collins I& APPENDIX A IV. CONCLUSIONS ' This study assessed the impacts of the Gillespie Farm on the short range (2010) and long range (2022) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is ' concluded: - The development of the Gillespie Farm is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, the Gillespie Farm 1 will generate approximately 6466 daily trip ends, 505 morning peak hour trip ends, and 665 afternoon peak hour trip ends. - Current operation at the key intersections is acceptable with existing controls and geometry. - Peak hour signal warrants are likely to be met at the Timberline/Vine, Mountain Vista/Timberline, and CR11/Country Club intersections in the short range (2010) future with the background traffic forecasts. - In the short range (2010) future, given development of the Gillespie Farm and an increase in background traffic, all of the key intersections are shown to operate acceptably with signal control at the intersections that meet the peak hour signal warrants. In the long range (2022) future, given development of the Gillespie Farm and an increase in background traffic, all of the key intersections are shown to operate acceptably with the recommended geometry and control. Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian and bicycle modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines. The is no transit service in this area of Fort Collins. 26 level of service determination assumes that future residential developments (namely, Richard's Lake and Lind) will build their streets and adjacent streets in accordance with' Fort Collins Standards. This being the case, pedestrian facilities will exist where they currently do not. This is a reasonable assumption. If this does not occur_or is not accepted by the City, then acceptable pedestrian level of service cannot be achieved. The residential' area south of Fort Collins Country Club is not within the City limits. There is no consistent sidewalk system in this area. It is likely that these homeowners do not desire to have a sidewalk system. This being the case, the Gillespie Farm should not be required to install sidewalks in this area. The Pedestrian LOS Worksheet is provided in Appendix G. The minimum level of service for `other" is C for all categories. With the assumed future pedestrian facilities along future streets, the pedestrian level of service will be acceptable with the exception noted above. Tavelli Elementary School is within 1.5 miles of Gillespie Farm. As noted earlier, there are no sidewalks in the existing residential area between Tavelli School and Gillespie Farm. This area is not within the City limits. It is not known whether Tavelli School would serve Gillespie Farm. Alternatives would include bussing to another school or building a new school in this area. If a new school is built, the pedestrian access issues should be addressed in a transportation impact study for that school. Bicycle Level of Service Appendix G shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Gillespie Farm. Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are no bicycle destinations within 1320 feet of the Gillespie Farm. A bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix G. Transit Level of Service This area of Fort Collins is will not be serve by transit service according to the Fort Collins Transit Plan. Therefore, no transit level of service analysis is provided. 25 m Richard's Lake 1� Country Club m U) .90 - Denotes Lane CR52 m c - m E H LONG RANGE (2022) GEOMETRY i 24 Vine N Figure 11 T M E N J U Richard's Lake / � � � _�/ ` � J � � � ` � ' � � CR52 U*) co U) Street D 1 � Street C Street B o ,n Country Club _� _ /� _� _� —� U Mountain Vista Timberline SHORT RANGE (2010) GEOMETRY I 23 :— - Denotes Lane Figure 10 Continued from previous page TABLE 6 Long Range (2022) Total Peak Hour Operation nt WO, Nk, '4 2 V. wftiti JR. ...� !V net CR1 1/Street B (stop sign) WB LT/RT C C SB LT A B CR1 1/Street C (stop sign) WB LT/RT C C SB LT A A CRII 1/Street D (stop sign) WB LT/RT C C SB LT A A CR1 1/CR52 (signal) EB B B WB C C NB B C SB B B OVERALL B C CR52/Street 6 (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT B B SB LT/T/RT B B EB LT A A WB LT A A CR52/Street 5 (stop sign) NB LTIT/RT B B SB LT/T/RT A B EB LT A A WB LT A A CR52/Street 3 (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT B B SB LT/T/RT A B EB LT A A WB LT A A CR52/Street 1 (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT B B SB LTIT/RT A B EB LT A A WB LT A A 22 TABLE 5 Long Range (2022) Total Peak Hour Operation "'Kcr I Is Lemay/Vine Ramp (signal) WB C C NB B B SB C C OVERALL C C Lemay RampNine (signal) EB B B WB B A SB C C OVERALL B B TimberlineNine Ramp (signal) WB C B NB A A SB B B OVERALL B B Timberline RampNine (signal). EB C C WB B B SB C C OVERALL C C CR1 1/Country Club (signal) EB C C WB C C NB B C SB C C OVERALL C C Country Club/Street 7 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A Country Club/Street 10 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A Country Club/Street 5 (stop sign) NB LTIT/RT B B SB LTIT/RT B B EB LT A A WB LT A A Country Club/Street 11 (stop sign) SB LURT A A EB LT A A Country Club/Street I (stop sign) NB LTfT/RT B C SB LTfr/RT B B EB LT A A WB -LT A A I' Continued on next page I I 21, Continued from previous page TABLE 4 Short Range'(2010) Total Peak Hour Operation & CRI 1 /Street B (stop sign) WB LT/RT C C SB LT A B CR1 II/Street C (stop sign) WB LT/RT C C SB LT A B CR1 1/Street D (stop sign) WB LT/RT C C SB LT A A CR11/CR52 (signal) EB B C .WB C CNB B C SB B B OVERALL B C CR52/Street 6 (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT B B SB LTrr/RT B B EB LT A A WB LT A A CR52/Street 5 (stop sign) NB LTrr/RT A B SB LT/T/RT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A CR52/Street 3 (stop sign) NB LT/T/RT B B SB LT/T/RT A B EB LT A A WB LT A A CR52/Street I (stop sign) NB LTrr/RT A A SB LTIT/RT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A 20 TABLE 4 Short Range (2010) Total Peak Hour Operation rEp R I-01,6®iyrl U,A 0N LemayNine Ramp (signal) WB C C NB B B SB B B OVERALL B B Lemay RampNine (signal) EB B B WB B A SB c C OVERALL B B TimberlineNine (signal) EB C C WB D c NB c C SB C C OVERALL c C Mountain Vista/Timberline (signal) EB A A WB B B NB C C OVERALL B B Mountain Vista/CR9 (stop sign) SB LT c C SB RT B B SB APPROACH B B EB LT A A CR1 1 /Country Club (signal) EB c D WB C C NB B c SB B B OVERALL c C Country Club/Street 7 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A Country Club/Street 10 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A Country Club/Street 5 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A Country Club/Street 11 (stop sign) SB LURT A A EB LT A A Country Club/street 1 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A I' Continued on next page I I 1 19 TABLE 3 Short Range (2010) Background Peak Hour Operation Iigg'-p- 0y. tv Lemay/Vine Ramp (signal) WB C C NB B B SB B B OVERALL B B Lemay Ramp/Vine (signal) EB B B WB A A SB C C OVERALL B B Timberline/VineWB (signal) EB D D D C NB D D SB B B OVERALL C D Mountain VistafTimberline. (stop sign) NB LT C IF NB RT B B NB APPROACH C IF WB LT A A Mountain Vista/Timberline (signal) EB B B WB C C NB C D OVERALL C C Mountain Vista/CR9 (stop sign) SB LT C C SB RT B B SB APPROACH B B EB LT A A CR 11 /Country Club (signal) EB C C NB B B SB A A OVERALL B B CRIII/CR52 (signal) EB B C WB C C NB B CSB B B OVERALL B C CR52/Street 6 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A CR52/Street 5 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A CR52/Street 3 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A CR52/Street 1 (stop sign) SB LT/RT A A EB LT A A 18 various analyses is that which is currently existing or that is needed to achieve acceptable operation in the respective short range and long range futures. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5, the key intersections operate in the short range (2010) background condition as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix D. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours with either improved geometry or the warranted signalization at some intersections. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 8 and the recommended geometries, the key intersections operate in the short range (2010) total condition as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 9 and the recommended geometries, the key intersections operate in the long range (2022) total condition as indicated in Table 5. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably during the peak hours. Geometry Figure 10 shows the short range (2010) geometry at the key intersections that were analyzed. The geometry at the Timberline/Vine intersection is that necessary to achieve acceptable operation with signalization. The signal and the geometry will be temporary. When the Timberline Road Overpass is built, with the associated intersections, this intersection will be eliminated. Figure 11 shows the long range geometry at the key intersections that were analyzed. The geometry at the intersections adjacent to the Gillespie Farm will not change significantly. It is expected that there will be future development to the south. Specifics regarding geometry along CR50E will be addressed in a transportation impact study for that development. Details regarding the Timberline/Vine interchange and the Lemay/Vine interchange should be addressed by the City of Fort Collins. The geometry and the operation provided in this transportation impact study uses the best information available at this time. Pedestrian Level of Service Appendix G shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of the Gillespie Farm. There will be two pedestrian destinations within 1320 feet of the Gillespie Farm. These are: 1) Richard's Lake residential and the homes adjacent to Fort Collins Country Club and 2) future Lind Property residential. This site is in an area type termed "other." The 17 U a 60/125 o - o Z'ia 5/15 m' ? r21240 z17M r12 5 NOM 4`N13 015�M NOM 1751130 1NOM Richard's Lake 10/5 r 515 20M5f ,oa5 5512o CR52 NOM 1850 -- 06 70201701180 NO1Azz"OA" Zz 12085 NOM �zz OOzz z55M m z NOM N N m 1 1 �30/20 } Street D 3 o� �m1 Mz —NOM } Street C ' n m N m 0 ZI NOM /-25/15 1 Street B W) $ w (D a� D m iO8 o0 00 o o 1-2f' z n �2W J130m 1 yp 185f175 J ` ` 3' L y75 - 155/725J f-8m . d m IL as m o 0 n�n �0 N f 30/45 r 95/175 45'135 Country Club 60/,50 t � y15 5l15 '�0 � r y10, low 45W I -' 40MI 85145 115/215 - 125210 , 115/130 —+• ' oriaa OO � 180/165 -� z 135/105 N m v �^' 3 `o r N r m N m N N J 700/510 6601595 �--595 ,5orzo5 --, 46W90 -+• m E --.-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles s p �a i i LONG RANGE (2022) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 16 Mixed -Use Area I� �$ m c N 3401195 Jm f 515/370 495/445 Vine m 3961480 -� C d E H N Figure 9 q L J U a o m $ m vIy in Jh I 1 � Richard's Lake 10,5 NOM y 55/35 O C o O i f m o a� C o �z f o n 0 ` ao Z l O O O 0 O JvI P1 Z f 1 Country Club ,85,46o 25/90 145no5 fI 1025—/ 525—/ 25195 —/ 5115 f CR52 OOo z z r d r r d m L V N 0 v ZIl41,1 ` `— NOM f NOM 15/45 .,Timberiine �� 20145 —1701150 90165 `1 f Vine m o 0 n m m N � O O O m N A N � SHORT RANGE (2010) TOTAL i PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 15 N CD U m o $e C » m 45l115 f-185r380 55l100 Mountain Vista 55220 -y --a— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles Figure 8 CR52 r 117--\ Q P ' n 2 ` (p L ' n r N Z `--NOM m y N N �29/17 � M w w Street D `e Z NOM ",r-59/35 Street C n �c �o om m zI NOM �23/14 Street B o r LO r r r m m d (D r N (n I W U) '^ V! fn O N f 76/45 L d ` Q N Q N Q r m ` `- N h r mf N--- �/3522 J 4(17 971.) ` 4116 �- 88M 17163 f-.3 3f9 f 50/111) 6120 - 3/12 Country Club 24/88 f 4/f15 4115 15/58 2 9 �8 2385 -�► 0 29/110 - 39/104 y 38/55 - 90180 -� 9B 81/50 Mixed -Use Area r Of 'It W N O] N �fi22 —12743 I � O m N N � —58/35 • O � N H G N %,-622 2/43 vl 17/65 - C T [� t6 m C C d J LONG RANGE (2022) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 14 rN • AM/PM Figure 7 f n z �NOM `° N 1 � 51130 � 1 t Street D o M a ps zI -NOM 1 /- 94156 Street C O A O m O p YIl L NOM 1' 1 \ 3=1 1 Street B I �-.-78147LNOM N Z NOM m'Z 1 104/62 J f 139/84 Country Club 2U90 �/\\\ 725 �/ 624 26194 —/ za87 -+ 48/177 -+- 42/153 -; 16159 m 0 m m z '.*I- NOM v Z NOM -�- 4225 NOM 3/13 13/46 13146 — I� 622 Vine A m N 4) J SHORT RANGE (2010) SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 13 A& N 0) Q' U N — 622 -12/43 3923 Mountain Vista f AM/PM Figure 6 site generated traffic from other developments, existing traffic volumes were increased by 20 per year on all area streets. Since site generated traffic from other developments would likely be included in the 2% per year increase, background traffic forecasts are considered to be conservative. The street system in the short range (2010) future is essentially as it exists today, with one exception. It is assumed that in the next eight years, the Lemay Avenue overpass will be completed. This improvement will eliminate the Lemay/Vine intersection and the railroad conflicts on Lemay Avenue. The overpass project will create two T- intersections. The street system in the long range (2022) future will include the Timberline Road overpass. This will eliminate the Timberline/Vine intersection and the railroad conflicts at the Timberline/Vine intersection. It is also assumed that CR11 would be completed to Vine Drive as shown on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Both City Plan and the Master Street Plan show a mixed -use commercial area and detailed street system north of Mountain Vista. Due to unknowns regarding this area, detailed analyses were not performed at intersections in this area. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figures 6 and 7 show the respective short range (2010) and long range (2022) site generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figures 8 and 9 show the respective total (site plus background) short range (2010) and long range (2022) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Traffic projections for the long range future horizon were obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP and other traffic studies prepared for this area of Fort Collins. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any ' location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Using the short range (2010) background traffic forecasts, peak hour signal warrants are likely to be met at the Timberline/Vine, Mountain Vista/Timberline, and CR11/Country Club intersections using speed greater than 40 mph. Peak hour signal warrant analyses are provided in Appendix C. operation Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the key intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis reflecting a year 2010 condition, and for the long range analysis ■ reflecting a year 2022 condition. The intersection geometry used in the 12 M IN a) J (o M m m SHORT RANGE (2010) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ountain Vista Figure 5 11 COUNTY ROAD 52 in - 1111W-11�11���� � �� � j@ SCALE: V=400' A& N l�liilrF Ili 1 rf- Figure 3 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Gillespie Farm is a residential development, located in the southeast quadrant of the CR11/CR52 intersection in Fort Collins. Figure 3 shows a site plan of the Gillespie Farm. The short range analysis (Year 2010) includes development of the Gillespie Farm and an appropriate increase in background traffic, due to normal growth and other potential developments in the area. The long range future was assumed to be Year 2022. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. A compilation of trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. TABLE 2 Trip Generation F i K -. T r r f tt'# !l. IstY X r y a L 1f 4txc. ' S >'r.cc'k a;2r-: i a ., z1-iHlk 413r`{ :^'T^•n. "1.p,,?�vta t};0>= ,(yyj./y�S.�jy1 �f RAW r �y�{.�.,b°q y�.�r Y �F.: k 3.11. .,MMr Wes» t Ri�WR i.a'T" .. 210 Single Family 526 D.U. 9.57 5034 0.19 100 0.56 295 0.65 342 0.36 189 220 Apartment 216 D.U. 6.63 1432 0.08 17 0.43 93 0.42 91 0.20 43 Total 6466 117 388 433 232 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for the Gillespie Farm based upon gravity model analysis, the location of trip productions for these types of land uses, and engineering judgment. Future year data was obtained from the NFRRTP and other traffic studies. Figure 4 shows the short range (2010) and long range (2022) trip distribution used for the Gillespie Farm. Background Traffic Projections Figure 5 projections. future horizon traffic studies traffic studies PUD, KB Homes, shows the short range (2010) 'background traffic Background traffic projections for the short range was obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP and various prepared for this area of Fort Collins., The other in this area are for Richard's Lake PUD, Hearthfire the Lind Property ODP, and Eastridge. In addition to 8 ' intersections, acceptable operation is considered to be at level of service F for any approach leg for an arterial/collector or arterial/ local intersection and level of service C for any approach leg for an collector/local intersection in low density mixed -use residential areas. Pedestrian Facilities ' Currently, there are no pedestrian facilities along the area streets. However, when these roads are built to arterial and collector standards, sidewalks will be included in the respective cross sections. Sidewalks are/will be incorporated within this development. Bicycle Facilities Bicycle lanes exist within the cross section of Lemay Avenue, Timberline Road, Vine Drive, and Mountain Vista Drive. Currently, there are no bicycle facilities along the other area streets. However, when these roads are built to arterial and collector standards, bicycle lanes will be included in the respective cross sections. Transit Facilities Transfort does not serve this area of Fort Collins. 7 TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation M1 5 -1AY Si S �f ,Sy'!� jlgy,.lj i)1M�b%.I p•R3d-{I F� F ��/yRy�SN,"S w^^YY 1 h YeY!"a �w' .+, t.x a qi J��Wtt1iV1, 31 s t) F ,{T; i t�,r a s V.idriY S,� } 11✓w%Yl.k Z g .�{.4{tL4A j}f. }'FF ' t •l sl , u i "1'��•y�';{_ i•qc ,yt 7d : } ! �� i, P#F 1 Yj-$%F`v� ^^�1�. Si ..i e >nl v illy; .� - / �'.:.c < F .v.�1rH Lemay/Vine (signal) EB C C WB C C NB B C SB C C OVERALL C C Timberline/Vine (all -way stop) EB B B WB B B NB B C SB B B OVERALL B B Mountain Vista/CR9 (stop sign) SB LT/RT B B EB LT/T A A Mountain VistalTimberline (stop sign) NB LT/RT B C WB LT/T A A CR11/Country Club (stop sign) EB LT/RT B B NB LTlT A A CR11/CR52 (stop sign) EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT/T/RT A A NB LT/T/RT A A SB LTIT/RT A A U Q m 1/2 in J r i -f 0/0 6/10 /-- 5/0 � f CR52 0/07/3 --- Country Club 26/34 123190 ao m - 88/167 N iO �150/139 l 50/36 13/39\\\ 114/165 —; 58/65 N T N E d _1 N rn o: -54/123 i!) `n 137/139 I 1 100/1 0/168 128M— ► !� I �� Mountain Vista 143/75 chi ii 163/89 — ~ r C 7/8 J l r 130/122 70131 2211/49 --/ f / Vine 1181135 —� 134/86 y N C t N .Q E N —•— AM/PM RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 W Timberline Road and classified as a two-lane arterial west of Timberline Road. Currently, it has a two-lane cross section east of CR11. At Timberline Road, Mountain Vista Drive has the eastbound and westbound approaches in a single lane. The existing speed limit in this area is 45 mph. Mountain Vista Drive provides access to Interstate 25. County Road 11 is to the west of the Gillespie Farm site. It is classified as a two-lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, CR11 has a two-lane cross section north of Mountain Vista Drive. At Country Club Road and CR52, CR11 has the northbound and southbound approaches in a single lane. The CR11/Country Club intersection has stop sign control on Country Club Road. The CR11/CR52 intersection has stop sign control on CR52. The existing speed limit in this area is 45 mph. Country Club Road (CR50E) is southwest of the Gillespie Farm site. It is an east -west street designated as a two-lane arterial west of CR11 and classified as a collector street east of CR11. Currently, it has a two-lane cross section west of CR11. At CR11, Country Club Road has the eastbound approach in a single lane. The existing speed limit in this area is 35 mph. County Road 52 (Richard's Lake Road) is south of the Gillespie Farm site. It is an east -west street designated as a two-lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a two-lane cross section near the Gillespie Farm site. At CR11, CR52 has the eastbound and westbound approaches in a single lane. The existing speed limit in this area is 45 mph. ' Existing Traffic ' Recent peak hour traffic counts at the key existing intersections are shown in Figure 2. The traffic data for the Lemay/Vine intersection was collected in January 2002. The traffic data for the Timberline/Vine intersection was collected in May 2002. The traffic data for the other key intersections was collected in September 2002. Raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix A. Existing Operation The counted intersections were evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak hour traffic shown I� in Figure 2, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in Appendix B. The key intersections operate acceptably overall during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Acceptable operation at signalized intersections during the peak hours is defined as level of service D or better. At unsignalized 4 SITE LOCATION SCALE: 1 "=4000' Figure 1 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of the Gillespie Farm is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily either vacant (agriculture) or residential. Two residential developments (Richard's Lake and Hearthfire) are under construction to the northwest of the site. Land adjacent to the site is flat (<2% grade) from a traffic operations perspective. The center of Fort Collins lies to the southwest of the proposed Gillespie Farm. Roads The primary streets near the Gillespie Farm site are Lemay Avenue, Timberline Road, Vine Drive, Mountain Vista Drive, County Road 11, Country Club Road, and CR52. Lemay Avenue (CR13) is to the west of the Gillespie Farm site. It is classified as a four -lane arterial south of Country Club Road and classified as a two-lane arterial north of Country Club Road. Currently, Lemay Avenue has a two-lane cross section north and south of Vine Drive. At Vine Drive, Lemay Avenue has the northbound and southbound approaches in a single lane. The Lemay/Vine intersection has signal control. The existing speed limit in this area is 35 mph. Timberline Road (CR9E) is to the south of the Gillespie Farm site. It is classified as a six -lane arterial south of Vine Drive and classified as a four -lane arterial north of Vine Drive. Currently, Timberline Road has a two-lane cross section south of Mountain Vista Drive. At Vine Drive, Timberline Road has the northbound and southbound approaches in a single lane. The Timberline/Vine intersection has all - way stop sign control. At Mountain Vista, Timberline Road has the northbound approach in a single lane. The Mountain Vista/Timberline intersection has stop sign control on Timberline Road. The existing speed limit in this area is 45 mph. Vine Drive is south of the Gillespie Farm site. It is an east - west street designated as a four -lane arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. Currently, it has a two-lane cross section in the subject segments. At Lemay Avenue, Vine Drive has eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes, and combined through/right-turn lanes. At Timberline Road, Vine Drive has the eastbound and westbound approaches in a single lane. The existing speed limit in this area is 45 mph. Mountain Vista Drive (CR50) is south of the Gillespie Farm site. It is an east -west street designated as a four -lane arterial east of 2 I. INTRODUCTION ' This transportation impact study_ (TIS) addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Gillespie Farm. This development is also known as Maple Hill. The proposed Gillespie Farm is located in the southeast quadrant of the CR11/CR52 intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (VF Ripley Associates), the project engineering consultant (TST Inc.), and the project owner/developer. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort ' Collins transportation impact study guidelines as contained in the "Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards." A Base Assumptions Form and related information are provided in Appendix A. Following Fort ' Collins staff .comments, a final TIS will be prepared. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; ' - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; Analyze signal warrants; Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and ' transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent Peak Hour Traffic ............................. 5 3. Site Plan ............................................ 9 4. Trip Distribution .................................... 10 5. Short Range (2010) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 11 6. Short Range (2010) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic .. 13 7. Long Range (2022) Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ... 14 8. Short Range (2010) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 15 9. Long Range (2022) Total Peak Hour Traffic ............ 16 10. Short Range (2010) Geometry .......................... 23 11. Long Range (2022) Geometry ........................... 24 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form/Peak Hour Traffic Counts B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions C Signal Warrant Analysis D Short Range Background Traffic Operation E Short Range Total Traffic Operation F Long Range Total Traffic Operation G Pedestrian/Bicycle Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Roads................................................ 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 4 Existing Operation ................................... 4 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 7 Bicycle Facilities ................................... 7 Transit Facilities ................................... 7 III. Proposed Development ................................. 8 Trip Generation ...................................... 8 Trip Distribution .................................... 8 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 8 TripAssignment ...................................... 12 Signal Warrants ...................................... 12 Operation Analysis ................................... 12 Geometry............................................. 17 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 17 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 25 Transit Level of Service ............................. 25 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 26 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation .......................... 6 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 8 3. Short Range (2010) Background Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 18 4. Short Range (2010) Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 19 5. Long Range (2020) Total Traffic Peak Hour Operation .......................... 21