HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAPLE HILL, PHASE ONE - PDP - 29-00A - REPORTS - TRAFFIC STUDYCOUNTY ROAD 52
I NwvdM-
MIN.
!mil
Me M I
OWN
111;Ltm,
4J
Ism!al
pro"
11
LB :
APPENDIX B
Chapter 7 — STREET DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA
Section 7.4 General Design Elements
Ta61® 7.3
Lorimer County Urban a lStreet StaCound rdly of Loveland, end, a d Reenacted
October 1, 2002
Adopt
Page 7-7
APPENDIX A
should be blocked by a vehicle on the street. As such, with
reasonable driver prudence, the corner clearance variance is not
detrimental the public health, welfare, and safety.
There are a few locations at the intersections of the collector
streets where lots are designed to be wider. Where the driveway will
be located on the smaller dimensional side of those lots, the
driveways must be located at the property line. This will meet the
corner clearance criteria.
Some end lots at the intersections of two local streets are
intended to have a duplex residential product. It is also desired
that the driveways to this duplex product be from both local streets.
Based upon review of available site plans, this will be possible while
still meeting the 50 foot minimum corner clearance for a local
residential street.
In conclusion, I believe that the variances to the intersection
spacing and the minimum corner clearance between driveways and street
intersections:
- Are not detrimental to the public health, welfare, and safety,
- Have no impact on the capital/maintenance requirements and costs.
Thank you for your consideration of these variance requests.
Sinter ,
Matthew J. -Delich, P.E.
analysis purposes, this is one vehicle every 20 seconds. The analysis
indicates a delay of 10 seconds per approach vehicle, which is less
than the arrival rate. Therefore, it is concluded that the vehicle
queues will not extend to the next adjacent intersection, which is
approximately 200 feet from either CR52 or Country Club Road
(extended). It is therefore concluded that the variance regarding
intersection spacing will not be detrimental to the public health,
welfare, and safety; nor will it have an impact on the
capital/maintenance requirements of the City.
There are two other locations (B,C) along the central N/S
collector where the separation is less than 250 feet (B-190' , C-220' ) .
From the available site plan, this cannot be corrected without making
street location changes on the east or west sides of the N/S
collector. However, the intersection spacing is large enough not to
cause operational concerns. The turning movements at the interior
local street intersections will be lower than those at the perimeter
intersections described in the previous paragraph. It is expected
that at a conservative peak hour factor condition, the approach
volumes would be on the order of one vehicle every 30 seconds. At
this arrival rate, the probability of two or more vehicles being in
the same area is very small. There is sufficient separation between
intersections so that conflicts would not likely occur. Therefore, it
is concluded that this spacing will not be detrimental to the public
health, welfare, and safety; nor will it have an impact on the
capital/maintenance requirements of the City.
From the available lotting plan for the Gillespie Farm, there are
single family lots along the minor collector streets. The typical lot
width is 50 feet with some -wider lots on corners. The corner
clearance for minor collector streets is 100 feet. There will be a
few locations along the two N/S collector streets that will not meet
this corner clearance. The lot widths are dictated by the density
requirement in "City Plan." It is only the end lots along the N/S
minor collector streets at the local street intersections that cannot
meet the minimum corner clearance standard. Single family detached
dwelling units generate approximately 10 trip ends per day and one
trip end in the respective peak hours. In the morning peak hour, the
trip end is an exit from a driveway. In the afternoon peak hour, the
trip end is an entrance to a driveway. As was demonstrated in a
previous memorandum (10/12/01), daily traffic volumes on the two
collector streets that bisect the Gillespie Farm ODP will be less than
1000 vehicles per day (vpd). Daily traffic volumes on the eastern
minor collector street will range from 3300 to 1600 vpd. Daily
traffic volumes on the local streets will generally be less than 300
vpd. Traffic in the peak hours on these streets will be intermittent
and low. On the bisecting collector streets, the average gaps between
vehicles will be greater than 20 seconds. The probability of
conflicts at/near these intersections will be minimal. Driveways
should be located as far away from all of the subject intersections as
possible. It is not likely that there will be more than a one vehicle
queue at any of the subject intersections. Therefore, no driveway
00
M
L0
0
03
O
cc
a
0
O
X
0
z
a
J
w
O
J
w
0
z
w
a
z
w
rJn
V
N
t-
N
N
a
U
J
W
a
mi
W
F-
March 25, 2003 File: 0190LT03
I;t Mr. Dave Stringer, P.E.
p Fort Collins Engineering Department
`n P.O. Box 580
co Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
0
r Dear Dave:
rn
a
LL request
letter was prepared for the Gillespie Farm ODP to
request variances to "Section 7.4 General Design Elements, Table
7-3, Access Management," as contained in the Larimer County Urban
Area Street Standards (LCUASS), October 1, 2002. Specifically,
the variances pertain to unsignalized intersection spacing and
CD
o corner clearance between driveways/alleys and street
N
m intersections. A copy of Table 7-3 is provided in Appendix A.
T The Gillespie Farm site plan is provided in Appendix B.
0
rn No driveways intersect with CR11 or CR52 (both 2-lane
i11 arterials). The minimum intersection spacing along minor
0 arterials is 460 feet. The range of separation is 460-660 feet.
a There will not be raised medians along either CR11 or CR52. All
intersection spacing exceeds 460 feet. There are two locations,
one on CR11 and one on CR52, where the 660 foot separation is
exceeded. On CR11, the separation between the first intersection
south of CR52 and CR52 is approximately 700 feet. On CR52, the
separation between the first and second intersections east of
CR11 is approximately 820 feet. Separation greater than 660 feet
require a modification of the standard, not a variance. The
greater separation between intersections will not present
operational concerns. None of these locations will be
detrimental to public health, welfare, and safety. They will
also not have an impact on the capital/maintenance requirements
and costs.
z The Gillespie Farm has an east/west collector street and a
x north/south collector street that bisect the site. In addition,
w
zthere is a north/south collector street near the east edge of the
_z
a site. All of these are designated as minor collectors. The
z
W minimum separation between intersections for a minor collector is
z 250 feet. There are four locations along the central N/S
a collector and two locations along the east N/S collector that are
s less than 250 feet. These locations are labeled A. B, C, D, E,
a and F on the site plan shown in Appendix B. Four of these
z locations (A,D,E,F) are at intersections that are on the edges of
¢ the site (CR50E and CR52). At the intersections with CR50E and
H CR52, the separate left -turn lanes are not required but may be
ad
2 striped as such, if that is the desire of the City. The long
LL range (2022) traffic forecasts at these four locations indicate
LL
less than or equal to 125 vehicles per hour in one direction. At
a conservative peak hour factor of 0.4, the maximum number of
vehicles in one direction in one minute would be five. For