HomeMy WebLinkAboutBELLA VISTA - PDP - 45-01A - REPORTS - TRAFFIC STUDY (7)TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
Site Information
al st
aft
i?000 TM ropy ugin a: :.,.,� .�.��.....�., ..................._e
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
Site Information
al st
att
Intersection
orsetooth/rin-rout-lin
enc /Co
Pnidpe
Jurisdiction
hort colli s
ate Performed
18/2002
Analysis Year
2W 202
nal sis Time Period
roject Description 0160
Mmix=
ast/West Street: horsetooth
North/South Street:
rin-rout-tin
ntersection Orientation: . East-West
IStudy Period hrs :
0.25
ehicle Volumes and Adjustments
a"or Street
Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume
10
1205
0
0
1125
15
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Tourly Flow Rate, HFR
10
1268
0
0
1184
15
ercent Heavy Vehicles
0
-
-1
0
--
—
edian Type
TWO Way Left Turn Lane
T Channelized
0
0
anes
1
2
0
0
2
0
onfi uration
L
T
T
TR
stream Si nal
0
0
inor Street
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
7
8
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume
0
0
0
0
0
10
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
0
0
0
0
0
10
ercent HeavyVehicles
0
0
0
0
0
0
ercent Grade (%)
0
0
tared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
T Channelized
0
0
anes
0
0
0
0
0
1
onfi uration
R
elay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
pproach
EB
WB
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
1
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
ane Configuration
L
R
(vph)
10
10
(m)(vph)
589
449
c
0.02
0.02
5% queue length
0.05
0.07
ontrol Delay
[pproach
11.2
13.2
OS
B
6
pproach Delay
—
—
13.2
Los
—
—
B
1-ICS2000770 Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida. NI Rights Reserved °°"""'
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
Site Information
al st
matt
Intersection
orsefooth/rin-rout-lin
enc /Co
mjd e
Jurisdiction
Ifort collins
ate Performed
6/18/2002
Analysis Year
2006
naI sis Time Period
m
ro'ect Descri tion 0160
ast/West Street: horsetooth
North/South Street:
rin-rout-lin
ntersection Orientation: East-West
IStudy Period hrs :
0.25
ehHe Volumes and Ad'ustments
a'or Street
Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume
10
1300
0
0
1485
10
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
a85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
ourly Flow.Rate, HFR
11
1529
0
0
1747
11
ercent Heavy Vehicles
0
— I
--
0
--
-
edian Type
Two Way Left Turn Lane
T Channelized
0
0
anes
1
2
0
0
2
0
onfiguration
L
T
T
TR
stream Signal
0
0
inor Street
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
7
8
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume
0
0
0
0
0
10
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
a85
a85
a85
0.85
0.85
0.85
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
0
0
0
0
0
11
ercent Heavy Vehicles
0
0 1
.0
0 1
0
r
0
ercent Grade (%) 10
0
lared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
T Channelized
0
0
anes
0
0
0
0
0
1
R
onfiguration
ela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service
pproach
EB
WB
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
1
4
7 8
9
10 11
12
ane Configuration
L
R
(vph)
11
11
(m) (vph)
361
295
c
0.03
0.04
5% queue length
Ipproach
0.09
0.12
ontrol Delay
15.3
7.7
17.7
OS
C
C
17.7
pproach Delay
C
LOS
—
—
tie...:.... A 14
ri('S?OOOrh1 Copyright C) 2000 University of Ptonaa. All lugms Icesnrveu
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information
Site Information
nal st
att
Intersection
orsetooth/rin-rout-lin
enc /Co.
Imjdpe
Jurisdiction
fort collins
Date Performed
1611812002
Analysis Year
006
nal sis Time Period
ro'ect Description 0160
m
ast/West Street: horsetooth
North/South Street:
tin-rout-lin
ntersection Orientation: East-West
tud Period hrs :
0.25
ehicle Volumes and Adjustments
aior Street
Eastbound
Westbound
ovement
1
2
3
4
5
6
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume
10
1010
0
0
945
15
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
11
1188
0
0
1111
17
Percent Heavy Vehicles
0
—
-
0
—
—
edian Type
Two Way Left Turn Lane
T Channelized
-
0
0
anes
1
2
0
0
2
10
onfiguration
L
T
T
I TR
U stream Signal
L
0
inor Street
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
7
1 8
9
10
11
12
L
T
R
L
T
R
olume
0
0
0
0
0
10
eak-Hour Factor, PHF
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
ourly Flow Rate, HFR
0
0
0
0
0
11
ercent Heavy Vehicles
0
0 1
0
0
0
0
ercent Grade (%)
0
0
tared Approach
N
N
Storage
0
0
T Channelized
0
0
Lanes
0
0
0
0
0
1
onfiguration
IR
lay,Queue Length, and Level of Service
proach
EB
WB
Northbound
Southbound
ovement
1
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
Lane Configuration
L
R
(vph)
1111
(m)(vph)
627
474
c
l
0.02
0.02
5% queue length
0.05
0.07
ntrol Delay
10.8
12.8
LOS
B
B
Approach Delay
—
—
12.8
Approach Los
—
—
B
11C'S2000 " Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved ° O.moo "`. "'
APPENDIX C
L
0
w
CU
CQ
V/
to
CO
M
O
y
110/10
/ X- 30130
Ma 4 ^off h
Full -movement Access
?ioh q�ess
/l
Sij
20j3J^ ~
ss
�
J
O
Q'
Z
'T
`
N `—
O
Ln
�n o o . 85/135
`O LO '� — 940/1460
110/175
0
T
o ui
15/10
1
�.--1125/1760
"00J
45/150
I
10/10 J
45/170
1030/1235 —►
``�'�
N
1205/1540 —
1145/1385 —►
20/40 --y
T T
8
tM O LO
T
T
C
�.— AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
LONG RANGE (2020) TOTAL
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
L
N
O
m
N
60/110
—1075/1650
Horsetooth
Figure 10
m
A,10/10
30/30
ement gc�ss
o
Cl)
N� �ry ^� RT�n��Ti
s h nq
,v, ��e
ss
O O Ln
,n O o 70/115
tO `r (O — 790/1230
95/150
35/125 ) � r
865/1040 ,O in LO
15/35 --y Ln
N o
C)
t00 0)
N
CD
C
ca
J
O
b
J
10/10
1010/1300 —�
AM/PM
Rounded to Nearest
5 Vehicles
15/10
945/1
40/140
965/1170 —►
p
50/90
-�— 905/1385
Horsetooth
SHORT RANGE (2006) TOTAL Figure 9
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
APPENDIX B
N
C
`; AM/PM
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 8
APPENDIX A
00
C7
LJO
01) Ch
o
L0
o �.
a �
O p
o
U �
a
0 LL
Z
J
W
7
J
T
co
W C)
E N
¢ Q>
0 �
LLJ o'
a �
Z 1;
W Z
rJn
V O
CV d
n
CV
N
W
a
z
ac
n W
z
U
z
J W
W O
a
¢
O
IL
CO)
z
cc
` a
F-
W df
U_
F LL
LL
a
¢
5Q
L
M1 yCO) 0.1:1910Li
TO: Chuck McNeal, Stanford Development LLC
Javier Martinez Campos, Stanford Development LLC
Eldon Ward, Cityscape Urban Design
Daryl Sigler, Northern Engineering Services
City -of Fort Collins
FROM: Matt Delich
DATE: June 19, 2002
SUBJECT: Bella Vista Transportation Impact Study - Horsetooth Road
access (File: 0160ME02)
The direct access to Horsetooth Road from Bella Vista is being
designed as a right-in/right-out/left-in at the suggestion of City
staff. The transportation impact study.(TIS) analyzed this access
as a right-in/right-out.access. This memorandum provides the traffic
documentation so that Northern Engineering Services can provide the
lane striping design for Horsetooth Road at this access.
Appendix A contains Figure 8, Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic
from the cited TIS. With the change of the Horsetooth Road access
to right-in/right-out/left-in, it is likely that half of the 18/17
eastbound left turns at the Horsetooth/Stanford/Landings intersection
would become eastbound left turns at the Horsetooth Road access.
Figures 9 and 10 in Appendix B show the short range (2006) total peak
hour traffic and the long range (2020) total peak hour traffic,
respectively, with right-in/right-out/left-in access to Horsetooth
Road. This access will operate acceptably in both the short range
future and long range future. Calculation forms are provided in
Appendix C. By inspection, all other key intersections will operate
acceptably.
Given the forecasted traffic shown in Figures 9 and 10 in
Appendix B, the eastbound left -turn lane should.provide storage for
one vehicle (20 feet) plus deceleration, per the "Larimer County
Urban Area Street standards" (LCUASS). Given the physical
constraints in the area, the minimum design criteria on Figure 8-02
in LCUASS was used.. At 40 mph, the deceleration length should be 280
feet.including a bay taper at 160 feet (WS/3). The components of the
eastbound left -turn lane at this access will total 300 feet including
bay taper. Design drawings will be provided by Northern Engineering
Services.