Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBELLA VISTA - PDP - 45-01A - REPORTS - (4)RECEIVED a Landings Community Association,Inc. rURRFNT PLANNING c/o Milton & Company, Managing Agent 3424 Stanford Rd. -- Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 -- 223-5000 February 15, 2002 To: Planning Department, City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board, City of Fort Collins From: Landings Community Association Board of Directors Subject: Bella Vista Project, NE Corner of Horsetooth Road and Stanford Road Conclusions: 1. This project is not compatible, is out of character, and is out of context with our neighborhood. 2. The buildings proposed are so tall and of such mass as to be intrusive in our environment. They are not compatible in scale, and the transition from the adjacent neighborhood is abrupt. 3. There is concern that existing codes, especially with respect to height, are being circumvented by the applicant. Recommendations: 1. Application of the Land Use Code to the development project should be done strictly, with the City watching out for the interests and concerns of the surrounding neighborhoods. More and earlier interaction in the development review process between City, developer, and the neighborhoods affected should be a goal of the process. 2. This development project should be rejected by the City. " process on a project of such importance to It is probably appropriate to change the process to have additional neighborhood meetings which include the City, developer and residents. When the Marriot property was being planned, there was cooperation between developer and the Landings. The developer originally proposed a box design, but after consulting with us redesigned the structure to a stepped design back from the street that better fit the site and the neighborhood. We would welcome such cooperation. We have received many comments from residents in talking about this project that represents a great deal of cynicism about the development approval process. Many residents have the perception that by the time a project is revealed to the public, it is a "done deal' between the City and developer and that there is no chance for affected residents to stop even an outrageous project such as this. We hope this is not the case or that perception might represent reality. Summary In summary, this project does not fit our neighborhood, does not meet requirements of the Land Use Code especially with regard to height, and should be rejected by the City. Landings Board of Directors, Ro ffman hyvnn Carlisle Ilan Shamir Je Applebyt President Vice President Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 3 Cluster 1 Steve Dellinger Dave Lenort Cluster 5 Cluster 6 Contextual Height. We have been told that the text that is presented by the on-line City of Fort Collins Land Use Code is in error in that it no longer contains two very pertinent sentences that (1) require corner lots to judge contextual heights by an abutting lot (this would be the Aspen Leaf Apartments), and (2) if abutting lots are vacant, the zone maximum height is assigned to that lot. It certainly is fortuitous for this applicant that those sentences were removed. However, 3.5.1 (C) allows comparing height only to buildings on the same block, unless no buildings exist thereon, only then can comparisons be made to an adjoining block. The applicant has asked for the height exemption by using the Marriot Hotel as the point of context for this exception. Looking at the zoning map of this block, the lot (parcel) on which the Marriot exists is over a city block (400 ft) from the applicant lot. The code states that for context, even if allowed to another block and into another zone, in spite of 3.5.1 (C), the lots must be adjacent. We were told that the applicant argued that there was an underlying lot that extended to Stanford Road that included the lot (parcel) that the Marriot Hotel occupies and that this existed on the last recorded plat change of that block, and the applicants lot is therefore adjacent to the Marriot. In fact, of course, additional lots were parceled off in this block and today all but one lot are fully developed (with buildings or parking lots). There has been de facto replatting of this block by use and the zoning map reflects this reality in showing the existing lots (parcels). The applicant's argument should be rejected by the city. Surely the City Attorney can provide arguments for this rejection. Kitze did investigate the height of the Marriot Hotel. One of the engineering staff at the Marriot told him that it was 60 ft. Actual measurements by Kitze in the stairwell closest to this project showed the first floor to be 12 ft, floors 2 through 6 to be 9 ft each, with the flat roof structure adding 3 ft for a total of 60 ft. Additional height due to HVAC equipment on the roof, elevator shaft protrusion on the roof, etc., do not count according to code. This applicant has requested far in excess of a proper "contextual height", even if allowed by the City. The Marriot is set back far off existing streets and has a stepped design to soften the effect of its height. This proposed project is right next to the streets with an "in -your -face" addition to our neighborhood. Other Concerns We expect the City to appropriately handle safety, traffic, streets, environmental, and other issues and also expect them to ask for our input and respond to it on items that affect us. In this high traffic area of the city, traffic and traffic noise (that will most certainly be increased by reflection from massive buildings), are especially of concern. Street design also affects us; our concerns about entrance and exit from Cove Island apparently didn't reach the person at streets reviewing this project, as he eliminated the Horsetooth Road median that had been proposed. We thought that would be an improvement. We are concerned about the lack of feedback to the neighborhood during the development proposed buildings. The code 3.5.1 (C) calls for similar size and height to the mass and scale of other structures on the same block. If no buildings exist on the same block, then comparisons can be made to adjoining blocks. With the existing Aspen Leaf apartments on the same block, the project must be compared to those structures. The height proposed for the four Bella Vista buildings, 55 to 83 ft. or 4 to 6 stories (claimed), greatly exceeds the Aspen Leaf building height, 25 to 30 ft. or 2 to 3 stories. With the height proposed for these buildings, views of surrounding residents as well as passersby will be lost. Privacy will also be lost for residents in Aspen Leaf and the Landings as upper levels of the project will look over existing trees into our yards and windows. Section G of 3.5.1 requires a special height review since height is over 40 ft. With regard to views, the building height and mass of this project significantly reduces the opportunities for views. The diagram submitted appears to suggest that the Bella Vista buildings are the view. The diagram ignores the fact that the views of the mountains and foothills are blocked by these buildings for many residents of Aspen Leaf Apartments. Front -of -building mountain and foothill views are also blocked for Cove Island residents, especially at the east end of Spindrift Court. A block of 6 townhouses faces directly at the project. The closeness of the buildings to the streets also detracts from views. The shadow analysis submitted appears to be in error (it should be symmetric at 9 AM and 3 PM). No visual analysis was seen by Kitze. When will this be available for viewing? According to the submittal standards, the extent to which existing views may be blocked must be identified. It also requires graphic form views before and after the project. The final section of 3.5.1 (G) allows height limit modifications. In this case, even if 3 stories were removed from the design of building C, it would be 50 ft. tall, too high in context with the neighborhood. This project would much better fit downtown Fort Collins where there are buildings of similar height. It would reinforce the downtown as focal point of the community. It certainly does not fit in our neighborhood. 3.8.17 Building Heights From the drawings presented, the Bella Vista building heights are A = 57 ft., B = 68 ft, C = 83 ft, D = 68 ft. In stories, according to the applicant, A = 4, B = 5, C = 6, D = 5. If floor areas under the roofs at the top floor level (called lofts by the applicant) are greater than one third of the area of the floor directly below, another story must be declared for that building. Interior plans must be made available for that assessment. The applicant is asking to rezone the parcel (lot) for this project from T to MMN. This is probably a proper zone, compatible with the adjacent Aspen Leaf Apartments. We have no objections to this zoning change. For Zone MMN, the maximum building height is 3 stories. This project greatly exceeds that. The applicant has applied for an exception to the MMN code limit under 3.8.17 (A)(3) Background: On November 14, 2001, the City of Fort Collins held a neighborhood informational meeting to discuss the Bella Vista development project. A number of Landings (Cove Island is one Cluster of the Landings Association, a group of over 400 members) residents attended and gave their concerns about the project to the city and the applicant. Two residents from the Landings, Lynn Carlisle and David Leary, followed up with letters of concern to the City about this proposal. On January 24, 2002, Paul (Tom) Kitze, another Landings resident, stopped at the Planning Department at 281 N. College to inquire about whether the project had progressed in the planning process. Steve Olt, the City planner on the project, gave Kitze copies of material submitted on or after November 28, 2001, by the applicant as part of the development review process. The material also included a copy of the City's first round response. Kitze brought that material to our Landings Association annual meeting on January 28, 2002 and our attending membership had a chance to review the project and make comments. We, the members of the Board of Directors of the Landings Association, asked Kitze to investigate the project,, keep the Board informed of his findings, and recommend actions on our part. This letter is the result of that request. Discussion: Land Use Code Review Article 3 General Development Standards Division 3.5.1 Building and Project Compatibility When considered within the context of the surrounding area, this project fails to meet the compatibility requirement. On the south of the project is the Landings subdivision, an established residential development of 1 to 2 story buildings, mostly single family. On the north and east is the Aspen Leaf Apartments, a development of 2 to 3 story, multifamily units. Directly to the west is the 2-story Stanford office building, adjacent parking lot, and a vacant lot which is zoned commercial. To the southwest are 2 story office buildings. All existing buildings adjacent to the project site are less than 3 stories. With all the trees in the area, on streets and around buildings, the sharpness of the building lines are muted, creating a very pleasant environment for residents and passers-by, whether in cars or walking. The proposed Bella Vista project would dramatically change that. Based on comments of neighborhood residents, the height and mass of the buildings will stick out like a sore thumb. The "Alpine Village" style shown on the elevations with peaked roofs would be more appropriate in a high mountain valley in the mountains. This is a definite contrast with the predominately flat -roofed, low buildings surrounding the project. The extreme proposed height will make screening by trees and landscaping ineffective for upper levels of the RECEIVED Landings Community Association, Inc. CURRENT PLANNING c/o Milton & Company, Managing Agent 3424 Stanford Rd. -- Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 -- 223-5000 February 15, 2002 To: Planning Department, City of Fort Collins Planning and Zoning Board, City of Fort Collins�— From: Landings Community Association Board of Directors Subject: Bella Vista Project, NE Corner of Horsetooth Road and Stanford Road Conclusions: 1. This project is not compatible, is out of character, and is out of context with our neighborhood. 2. The buildings proposed are so tall and of such mass as to be intrusive in our environment. They are not compatible in scale, and the transition from the adjacent neighborhood is abrupt. 3. There is concern that existing codes, especially with respect to height, are being circumvented by the applicant. Recommendations: 1. Application of the Land Use Code to the development project should be done strictly, with the City watching out for the interests and concerns of the surrounding neighborhoods. More and earlier interaction in the development review process between City, developer, and the neighborhoods affected should be a goal of the process. 2. This development project should be rejected by the City. 539 Spindrift Ct Fort Collins, CO 80525 226-6651 February 19, 2002 To: Steve Olt, City Planner Subject: Bella Vista Project, NE Corner of Horsetooth Road and Stanford Road RECEIVED PURRENT PLANNING Steve, here is the Landings Board letter. I don't know where to send the P & Z Board copy so would appreciate it if you could get it to them. Thanks for your help. Tom Kitze Mr. Stephen Olt, City Planner RE: Bella Vista Planning Review Current Planning Dept 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins CO 80522-0580 I live on Spindrift Ct and was unable to attend the review Wednesday evening. I have however spoken with one of the developers, Chuck McNeil, and would like to provide you with my input on the proposed project; pros and cons. The scale of the project and the proposed use is something entirely new for Fort Collins. There is no comparable. Traffic: The impact of a large residential and retail center on local traffic on Horsetooth, which is already heavily loaded, will be considerable. The residents on Spindrift Ct can certainly expect an already hazardous egress to worsen. And restricting our single entrance and exit in any way would surely reduce the desirability of living on Spindrift, and subsequently our property values. Sight line: Six to Eight story buildings on an already elevated site would completely dominate the skyline in the area. It would eliminate our view to the North and create an overwhelming presence outside our bedroom windows. It would completely change the experience we enjoy of a small relatively secluded community in front of our townhomes. Inconsistency: The project is out of place. Perhaps in a higher density downtown area, or in a Mountain community, this project would be stunning. The location and concept are not consistent with the lifestyle of the surrounding community. The developers are promoting a walk -to -work and walk -to -shop concept. As you know, Fort Collins is a drive -to community. Utilization of that site must recognize that fact and plan for more appropriate in -fill. A more appropriate in -fill in my view would be a buffered extension of the Aspen Leaf apartments, with restricted egress to Horsetooth. Quality: I do believe the developers are quality people, and as locals will consider the impact of their project on the community and take accountability if the project doesn't unfold as planned. And I'm very happy that the proposed development is not a high traffic high presence retail project, like a 24-hr convenience center! Widening of Horsetooth: Related to this review are my more general questions about potential future widening of Horsetooth Rd. Does the City have such plans? The only buffer Spindrift Ct has to Horsetooth is our tree -lined earthen birm. Widening Horsetooth would require cutting into and perhaps eliminating that buffer. Such development would be absolutely unacceptable. 1 fear that Bella Vista would accelerate the City's need to widen Horsetooth, with unimaginable impact to Spindrift Ct. Thank you for allowing me to put my concerns into the record. Sincerely, David Leary 555 Spindrift Ct 80525-3134 288-3219 T o . 5-ftut O(+ FYI: WARREN SHORES HOMEOWNERS J u*4 tvAwi.dyoy c.�. -6 c +k� . 1 The following is from a letter from The Landings Association VP Lynn Carlisle. �. AUJJ0 z Date: February 11, 2002 Re: Bella Vista development at the corner of Hosetooth & Stanford The developer is proposing four buildings on the piece of property on the NE corner of Horsetooh and Stanford. Twenty thousand square feet of light commercial and 70+ condominiums are proposed with estimated prices of 400K to 700K. The tallest building is 90 feet tall, measured from Horsetooth; the other buildings are 60 feet and up. The Marriott Hotel is 60 feet high. The buildings will have minimal setback from Horsetooth and Stanford road. The Landings Homeowners Associations and the residents of Cove Island are opposed to the height of the buildings. We are not opposed to the concept and mix of commercial, but to the size and height. There is a Planning and Zoning meeting scheduled on February 21 at 7:00 p.m. in City Hall West, 300 W. Laporte, to evaluate changing the zoning from transitional to MMN. The developer wants a variance so they can build the 90 ft. tower. We, the Landings board, hope (members of the Warren Shores Association ) can attend. This development, if approved will significantly alter the character and skyline of our part of town. Our feeling is that it is out of context and character and is not compatible with the neighborhood. We hope you will join us in preventing the building of structures of this height. • The city person working with this project is Steven Olt at Current Planning. His e-mail address is solt(Mcgov.com . If you cannot attend the meeting you can write or e-mail the city -planning department with your concerns. We hope that many of the residents of Warren Shores will do this. Bella Vista items of concern: We do not want our beautiful view blocked. No exits on to Horsetooth to add to traffic We want compatible design with The Shores office park, Marriott, and office buildings immediately west of Stover. No big boxes. No convenience stores, all-night businesses, retail or apartments We are concerned about additional traffic. We want non -glare lighting. We want buildings not more that 3-4 stories high, not above the tree line. No construction access and egress on Horsetooth! Lynne Carlisle 226-3754 RECEIVED 559 Spindrift Court carlisledds(a)earthlink.net rURRENT PLANNING RECE`v Ed rURR�N� p�NN1NG Ur Mr. Steve Olt City Planner PO Box 580 Ft. Colllins, CO 80522-0580 Dear Mr. Olt, February 13, 2002 Regarding Bella Vista Rezone, File #45-01, has the City of Fort Collins given any consideration to the increase in traffic at the corner of College Avenue and Horsetooth Road if this property is built as proposed? The increase in personal and commercial vehicular traffic at a corner already considered as the busiest in the city is ludicrous. The style of the proposed development is naat aDcompatible with the style of the community around it. All commercial buildings (with the exception of the two story Shores Office Park) are flat topped and the ersatz "Alpine" design of Bella Vista is completely out of character. The height of these buildings is out of proportion to anything else south of Colorado State University and calls into question if we are expected to accept a series of high rises from Horsetooth Road to the south city limits. Please consider the objections of those living, working and driving in the area surrounding Bella Vista, File #45-01, reject this particular plan, and return to us with a more suitable plan for this 2.96 acre plot. Sincerely, Carol J..Gillette, Homeowner., 563 SpindriftlCourt -:Ft. Collins; CO 80525:::,r Steve O j.Bella Vista Planrnng Review _ Page 21 �._ eliminating that buffer. Such development would be absolutely unacceptable. I fear that Bella Vista would accelerate the City's need to widen Horsetooth, with unimaginable impact to Spindrift Ct. and the surrounding residential area. Thank you for allowing me to put my concerns into the record. Steve Olt - Bella Vista Planning Review _ Page 1 From: Jeff Emmel <jeff@clearwave.com> To: FC1.CFCPO(SOLT) Date: Wed, Feb 20, 2002 9:59 AM Subject: Bella Vista Planning Review RE: Bella Vista Planning Review Please be advised that I strongly oppose the construction of the Bella Vista development project (Location: Horsetooth Road between Stanford and Stover) for the following reasons. 1. The Bella Vista project is consistently out of context for the residential/low impact commercial area for which it is planned. Our neighborhood is made up primarily of homes and 2-3 story office buildings. Bella Vista's largest building is planned to be 89' 7" as viewed from Horsetooth, and the setback from Horsetooth appears to be less than 10'. The Marriott Hotel is being cited as the contextual height comparison, and the Marriott is only 59-60' in height. In addition, the Marriott is set back from Stanford and from Horsetooth by over 400' and is not adjacent in any way to the Bella Vista project. Allowing Bella Vista to be built in this part of the community would open the door to a domino effect wherein other large buildings similar in height to Bella Vista can be built. Within a few years, this area could look like downtown Denver. Our residential and light commercial area could be transformed into a full-blown commercial zone. Amore appropriate locale for a project 89' 7" tall would be downtown Fort Collins. The Bella Vista project would be controversial even downtown, as we are seeing from the opposition to the proposed construction project at the old Steeles' location. The scale of the Bella Vista project and the proposed use is something entirely out of context for this area of Fort Collins. 2. Traffic: The impact of a large residential and retail center on local traffic on Horsetooth, which is already heavily loaded, will be considerable. The residents on Spindrift Ct can certainly expect an already hazardous egress to worsen. And restricting our single entrance and exit in any way would surely reduce the desirability of living on Spindrift, and subsequently our property values. 3. Sight line: Six to eight story buildings on an already elevated site would completely dominate the skyline in the area. It would eliminate our view to the North, diminish our Western views and create an overwhelming presence outside our windows. It would completely change the experience we enjoy of a small relatively secluded community in front of our homes. 4. Inconsistency: The project is out of place. Perhaps in a higher density downtown area, or in a Mountain community, this project would be stunning. The location and concept are not consistent with the lifestyle of the surrounding community. A more appropriate in -fill in my view would be a buffered extension of the Aspen Leaf apartments, with restricted egress to Horsetooth. 5. Widening of Horsetooth: Related to this review are my more general questions about potential future widening of Horsetooth Rd. Does the City have such plans? The only buffer Spindrift Ct has to Horsetooth is our tree -lined berm. Widening Horsetooth would require cutting into and perhaps process on a project of such importance to us. It is probably appropriate to change the process to have additional neighborhood meetings which include the City, developer and residents. When the Marriot property was being planned, there was cooperation between developer and the Landings. The developer originally proposed a box design, but after consulting with us redesigned the structure to a stepped design back from the street that better fit the site and the neighborhood. We would welcome such cooperation. We have received many comments from residents in talking about this project that represents a great deal of cynicism about the development approval process. Many residents have the perception that by the time a project is revealed to the public, it is a "done deal" between the City and developer and that there is no chance for affected residents to stop even an outrageous project such as this. We hope this is not the case or that perception might represent reality. Summary In summary, this project does not fit our neighborhood, does not meet requirements of the Land Use Code especially with regard to height, and should be rejected by the City. Landings Board of Directors, Rob o an Lynn Carlisle Ilan Shamir Jerry Applebye. President Vice President Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 3 Cluster 1 jqli� Steve Dellinger Cluster 5 (z- Dave Lenort Cluster 6 Contextual Height. We have been told that the text that is presented by the on-line City of Fort Collins Land Use Code is in error in that it no longer contains two very pertinent sentences that (1) require corner lots to judge contextual heights by an abutting lot (this would be the Aspen Leaf Apartments), and (2) if abutting lots are vacant, the zone maximum height is assigned to that lot. It certainly is fortuitous for this applicant that those sentences were removed. However, 3.5.1 (C) allows comparing height only to buildings on the same block, unless no buildings exist thereon, only then can comparisons be made to an adjoining block. The applicant has asked for the height exemption by using the Marriot Hotel as the point of context for this exception. Looking at the zoning map of this block, the lot (parcel) on which the Marriot exists is over a city block (400 ft) from the applicant lot. The code states that for context, even if allowed to another block and into another zone, in spite of 3.5.1 (C), the lots must be adjacent. We were told that the applicant argued that there was an underlying lot that extended to Stanford Road that included the lot (parcel) that the Marriot Hotel occupies and that this existed on the last recorded plat change of that block, and the applicants lot is therefore adjacent to the Marriot. In fact, of course, additional lots were parceled off in this block and today all but one lot are fully developed (with buildings or parking lots). There has been de facto replatting of this block by use and the zoning map reflects this reality in showing the existing lots (parcels). The applicant's argument should be rejected by the city. Surely the City Attorney can provide arguments for this rejection. Kitze did investigate the height of the Marriot Hotel. One of the engineering staff at the Marriot told him that it was 60 ft. Actual measurements by Kitze in the stairwell closest to this project showed the first floor to be 12 ft, floors 2 through 6 to be 9 ft each, with the flat roof structure adding 3 ft for a total of 60 ft. Additional height due to HVAC equipment on the roof, elevator shaft protrusion on the roof, etc., do not count according to code. This applicant has requested far in excess of a proper "contextual height", even if allowed by the City. The Marriot is set back far off existing streets and has a stepped design to soften the effect of its height. This proposed project is right next to the streets with an "in -your -face" addition to our neighborhood. Other Concerns We expect the City to appropriately handle safety, traffic, streets, environmental, and other issues and also expect them to ask for our input and respond to it on items that affect us. In this high traffic area of the city, traffic and traffic noise (that will most certainly be increased by reflection from massive buildings), are especially of concern. Street design also affects us; our concerns about entrance and exit from Cove Island apparently didn't reach the person at streets reviewing this project, as he eliminated the Horsetooth Road median that had been proposed. We thought that would be an improvement. We are concerned about the lack of feedback to the neighborhood during the development proposed buildings. The code 3.5.1 (C) calls for similar size and height to the mass and scale of other structures on the same block. If no buildings exist on the same block, then comparisons can be made to adjoining blocks. With the existing Aspen Leaf apartments on the same block, the project must be compared to those structures. The height proposed for the four Bella Vista buildings, 55 to 83 ft. or 4 to 6 stories (claimed), greatly exceeds the Aspen Leaf building height, 25 to 30 ft. or 2 to 3 stories. With the height proposed for these buildings, views of surrounding residents as well as passersby will be lost. Privacy will also be lost for residents in Aspen Leaf and the Landings as upper levels of the project will look over existing trees into our yards and windows. Section G of 3.5.1 requires a special height review since height is over 40 ft. With regard to views, the building height and mass of this project significantly reduces the opportunities for views. The diagram submitted appears to suggest that the Bella Vista buildings are the view. The diagram ignores the fact that the views of the mountains and foothills are blocked by these buildings for many residents of Aspen Leaf Apartments. Front -of -building mountain and foothill views are also blocked for Cove Island residents, especially at the east end of Spindrift Court. A block of 6 townhouses faces directly at the project. The closeness of the buildings to the streets also detracts from views. The shadow analysis submitted appears to be in error (it should be symmetric at 9 AM and 3 PM). No visual analysis was seen by Kitze. When will this be available for viewing? According to the submittal standards, the extent to which existing views may be blocked must be identified. It also requires graphic form views before and after the project. The final section of 3.5.1 (G) allows height limit modifications. In this case, even if 3 stories were removed from the design of building C, it would be 50 ft. tall, too high in context with the neighborhood. This project would much better fit downtown Fort Collins where there are buildings of similar height. It would reinforce the downtown as focal point of the community. It certainly does not fit in our neighborhood. 3.8.17 Building Heights From the drawings presented, the Bella Vista building heights are A = 57 ft., B = 68 ft, C = 83 ft, D = 68 ft. In stories, according to the applicant, A = 4, B = 5, C = 6, D = 5. If floor areas under the roofs at the top floor level (called lofts by the applicant) are greater than one third of the area of the floor directly below, another story must be declared for that building. Interior plans must be made available for that assessment. The applicant is asking to rezone the parcel (lot) for this project from T to MMN. This is probably a proper zone, compatible with the adjacent Aspen Leaf Apartments. We have no objections to this zoning change. For Zone MMN, the maximum building height is 3 stories. This project greatly exceeds that. The applicant has applied for an exception to the MMN code limit under 3.8.17 (A)(3) Background: On November 14, 2001, the City of Fort Collins held a neighborhood informational meeting to discuss the Bella Vista development project. A number of Landings (Cove Island is one Cluster of the Landings Association, a group of over 400 members) residents attended and gave their concerns about the project to the city and the applicant. Two residents from the Landings, Lynn Carlisle and David Leary, followed up with letters of concern to the City about this proposal. On January 24, 2002, Paul (Tom) Kitze, another Landings resident, stopped at the Planning Department at 281 N. College to inquire about whether the project had progressed in the planning process. Steve Olt, the City planner on the project, gave Kitze copies of material submitted on or after November 28, 2001, by the applicant as part of the development review process. The material also included a copy of the City's first round response. Kitze brought that material to our Landings Association annual meeting on January 28, 2002 and our attending membership had a chance to review the project and make comments. We, the members of the Board of Directors of the Landings Association, asked Kitze to investigate the project, keep the Board informed of his findings, and recommend actions on our part. This letter is the result of that request. Discussion: Land Use Code Review Article 3 General Development Standards Division 3.5.1 Building and Project Compatibility When considered within the context of the surrounding area, this project fails to meet the compatibility requirement. On the south of the project is the Landings subdivision, an established residential development of 1 to 2 story buildings, mostly single family. On the north and east is the Aspen Leaf Apartments, a development of 2 to 3 story, multifamily units. Directly to the west is the 2-story Stanford office building, adjacent parking lot, and a vacant lot which is zoned commercial. To the southwest are 2 story office buildings. All existing buildings adjacent to the project site are less than 3 stories. With all the trees in the area, on streets and around buildings, the sharpness of the building lines are muted, creating a very pleasant environment for residents and passers-by, whether in cars or walking. The proposed Bella Vista project would dramatically change that. Based on comments of neighborhood residents, the height and mass of the buildings will stick out like a sore thumb. The "Alpine Village" style shown on the elevations with peaked roofs would be more appropriate in a high mountain valley in the mountains. This is a definite contrast with the predominately flat -roofed, low buildings surrounding the project. The extreme proposed height will make screening by trees and landscaping ineffective for upper levels of the Community Planning and Environmental Services Current Planning City of Fort Collins List of Public Input for the Bella Vista, Project Development Plan Administrative Public Hearing - April 10, 2003 Tom Kitze - 539 Spindrift Court 2. Gabrielle Numair - 527 Spindrift Court 3. Carol Gillette - 563 Spindrift Court 4. Jeff Emmel - 543 Spindrift Court 5. Ruth Thomas - 503 Spindrift Court 6. Mike Odell - 624 Skysail Lane 7. James Comer - 306 Starboard Court 8. Richard Couillard - 3612 Mariner Lane 9. Tom Peterson - adjoining property owner (office building to west of Stanford Road). 10. Lynn Carlisle - 559 Spindrift Court (vice-president of the Landings HOA) Prepared by Stephen Olt, Current Planning Department G� 281 North College Avenue • PO. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020 • Copy of an article in the Fort Collins Coloradoan newspaper (3/ 10/03) regarding the context of the Bella Vista project in the surrounding neighborhoods. The Bella Vista, Project Development Plan staff report will be e-mailed to you the afternoon of Monday, April 7, 2003. Please let me know (at 970-221-6341) if you need additional materials or have any questions. Sincerely, Atephn Olt City Planner e Community Planning and Environmental Services Current Planning City of Fort Collins April 7, 2003 Re: Bella Vista, Project Development Plan - #45-01A Dear Linda, I have enclosed the following materials for our Administrative Hearing for the Bella Vista, Project Development Plan scheduled for Thursday, April 10, 2003, beginning at 5:30 p.m., City Council chambers, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO. 80525: • Vicinity Map • Administrative Interpretation #2-02 regarding the application of Section 3.8.17(A)(3), Contextual Height standards, of the Land Use Code. • Administrative Interpretation #3-02 regarding the application of Section 3.2.2(M)(1), Landscaping Coverage for parking lots as it relates to the upper deck of a parking structure. • Administrative Interpretation #4-02 regarding the application of Section 3.8.17(A)(3), Contextual Height standards, of the Land Use Code. • Memorandum, plus attachments (Hearing Presentation Items - For the Record), from Cityscape Urban Design. • Neighborhood Information Meeting notes from the neighborhood meeting held on November 14, 2001. • Neighborhood Information Meeting notes from the neighborhood meeting held on November 13, 2002. • Original Bella Vista Transportation Impact Study, dated November, 2 00 1, plus memorandums dated January 28, 2002, June 19, 2002, and July 15, 2002. • Numerous letters from affected property owners and citizens in opposition and in support of the Bella Vista project. • One set of the Bella Vista project development plans. • Memorandum of confirmation from the City Engineering Department regarding the building height of the Fort Collins Marriott Hotel. • E-mail memorandum from Steve Olt to Tom Kitze, a concerned neighbor, with interpretations on the Contextual Height limit in Section 3.8.17(A)(3) and the definition of "Lot" in the Land Use Code. 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (970) 221-6750 • FAX (970) 416-2020