Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE PARK TOWNHOMES AT FOSSIL RIDGE (FORMERLY ZIEGLER TOWNHOMES) - PDP/FDP - FDP160043 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS (9)Staff Report —Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 17 2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good and the proposal submitted is equal to a compliant plan. D. The Modification of Standard to Section 3.5.2(E)(2) that is proposed with this Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good and the proposal submitted is equal to a compliant plan. E. The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards of Article 3 — General Development Standards, if the Modification of Standard to Sections 3.5.2(D)(1), 3.5.2(D)(2), and 3.5.2(E)(2) are approved. F. The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards located in Division 4.5 Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood (LMN) of Article 4 — Districts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Zoning & Site Vicinity Map 2. Applicant's Modification of Standard Requests 3. Ziegler Townhomes Planning Document Set (Plat, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations, & Photometric Plan) 4. Ziegler Townhomes Traffic Impact Study Staff Report — Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 16 4. Compliance with Article 4 of the Land Use Code — Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood (LMN), Division 4.5: The project complies with all applicable Article 4 standards as follows: A. Section 4.5(B)(2)(a) — Permitted Uses The proposed use, single-family attached dwellings, is permitted in the LMN zone district and is consistent with the district's intent to provide a predominance of low -density housing. B. Section 4.5(D)(1) — Density The minimum density for developments in the LMN shall be four dwelling units per net acre. The maximum density for developments in the LMN shall be nine dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed development has a density of 8.93 dwelling units per gross acre. C. Section 4.5(E)(3) — Maximum Residential Building Height Residential buildings in the LMN shall have a maximum height of two and one-half stories. The proposed buildings are all two stories. 5. Findings of Fact/Conclusion: In evaluating the request for the Ziegler Townhomes Project Development Plan/Final Plan, Staff makes the following findings of fact: A. The Project Development Plan complies with the process located in Division 2.2 — Common Development Review Procedures for Development Applications of Article 2 — Administration. B. The Modification of Standard to Section 3.5.2(D)(1) that is proposed with this Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good and that by reason of exceptional physical conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situations, unique to such property, the strict application of the standard sought to be modified would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties. C. The Modification of Standard to Section 3.5.2(D)(2) that is proposed with this Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section Staff Report — Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 15 The proposed plan is consistent with the requirements of the Land Use Code in regards to the location of outdoor storage, screening of storage areas, and screening of rooftop mechanical equipment from public view. Operational/Physical Compatibility The proposed plan is consistent with the requirements of the Land Use Code in regards to hours of operation, placement of trash receptacles and location and number of off-street parking spaces. Q. Section 3.5.2(C)(2) — Housing Model Variety and Variation Among Buildings Single-family attached developments with more than five buildings that have more than two units each must have three distinctly different building designs. The proposed Ziegler Townhomes provides four distinctly different building designs. Each of these designs contains variations in massing, materials, footprint size, and color to differentiate each building. Each building does have similar roof forms and proportions to create a cohesive development without appearing repetitious. R. Section 3.5.2(E)(1) — Setback from Arterial Streets Residential buildings must be setback at least 30 feet from arterial streets. Ziegler Rd. is an arterial street. All of the buildings are setback at least 30 feet from Ziegler Rd. S. Section 3.5.2(E)(2) — Side and Rear Yard Setbacks The minimum side yard setback is five feet and the minimum rear yard setback is eight feet. The proposed buildings are all set back further than the minimum in the rear and side yard. T. Section 3.5.2(F) — Garage Doors Garage doors must be located in such a way to minimize the visual impact of garage doors from the street and major walkway spines. All of the garages are oriented towards the internal access drives serving the project. This orientation minimizes the visual impact of garage doors and meets the standard. Staff Report —Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 14 Developments must provide at least a 50-foot-widebuffer from wetlands and 100-foot-wide buffer from tributaries of Fossil Creek. McClelland's Creek is a tributary of Fossil Creek, so the 100-foot buffer applies. The decision maker may enlarge or reduce the buffer distance so long as the development meets a variety of performance standards. In summary, the development must preserve the ecological character of the habitat feature, enhance or preserve wildlife movement through the corridor, preserve existing trees and vegetation, and integrate with the feature. The buffer zone proposed is smaller than the 100 feet required by the Land Use Code. The applicant proposes enhanced plantings in the buffer zone to mitigate for a smaller buffer zone. Staff finds the enhanced plantings enhance the buffer zone adequately to mitigate for a reduced buffer size and thus meets this code section. P. Section 3.5.1 -Building and Project Compatibility The proposed plan is consistent with the requirements of the Land Use Code in regards to building and project compatibility including building size, height, bulk, mass, scale, mechanical equipment screening and operational/physical compatibility. Size, Height, Bulk, Mass and Scale The projects adjacent to Ziegler Townhomes include a mix of residential uses. Harvest Park contains single-family detached homes, duplexes, and townhomes with five units per building. This development borders Ziegler Townhomes to the north and west. The Sage Creek development to the south contains a mix of six -unit townhomes and single-family detached homes. Two-story structures predominate both developments. Ziegler Townhomes propose two-story townhomes with buildings consisting of four, five, six, and seven units. Each building has a similar size, height, bulk, mass, and scale to the townhomes in adjacent developments. The largest building part of Ziegler Townhomes will have a roughly 8,000 sq. ft. footprint. This footprint is nearly 2,000 sq. ft. smaller than the five unit buildings in Harvest Park. As such, the proposed development meets this code requirement. Outdoor Storage Areas/Mechanical Equipment Staff Report — Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 13 J. Section 3.2.2(K)(5) - Handicap Parking Sites with 1-25 parking spaces are required to provide one handicap parking space, which must be van accessible. The site plan shows two handicap spaces, both of which are van accessible. K. Section 3.2.3 - Solar access, orientation, shading All developments must be designed to accommodate active and/or passive solar installations and must not deny adjacent properties access to sunshine. The proposed building is designed and located to minimize the casting of shadows on adjacent properties and could accommodate future active and/or passive solar installations. L. Section 3.2.4 - Site Lighting The proposed lighting plan is consistent with the requirements of the Land Use Code in regards to the general standard, lighting levels and design standards. M. Section 3.2.5 - Trash and Recycling Enclosures Trash and recycling enclosures must be provided in locations abutting refuse collection or storage areas, shall be designed to allow walk-in access without having to open the main service gate, shall be screened from public view and shall be constructed on a concrete pad. The proposed trash and recycling enclosure abuts a storage area, allows walk- in access without having to open the main service gate, is screened from public view and is built on a concrete pad. N. Section 3.4.1(A) — Natural Habitat and Features — Applicability This section of the Land Use Code applies when a project is within 500 feet of an area or feature identified as a natural habitat or feature on the City's Natural Habitats and Features Inventory Map. The site is within of wetlands and McClelland Creek, so Section 3.4.1 applies. O. Section 3.4.1(E) — Establishment of Buffer Zones Staff Report — Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 12 Walkways must be provided to link sidewalks with building entries through parking lots. These walkways must also provide direct connections to off - site pedestrian and bicycle destinations. The proposed walkways connect all of the building entrances to the public sidewalks along County Fair Ln. and Ziegler Rd. The walkways also allow pedestrians to navigate the site while avoiding drive aisles. F. Section 3.2.2(D)(1) — Access and Parking Lot Requirements - Pedestrian/Vehicle Separation To the maximum extent feasible, pedestrians and vehicles shall be separated through provisions of a sidewalk or walkway. The site complies with this standard by providing an extensive sidewalk network around each building. The sidewalk is separated from vehicle use areas by a curb. G. Section 3.2.1(F) — Tree Protection and Replacement The tree mitigation plan submitted proposes the removal of 57 trees. Of these 57 trees, 24 have mitigation value totaling to the need for 46 mitigation trees. The landscape plan shows 46 upsized trees to meet the mitigation requirement. H. Section 3.2.2(J) - Setbacks The proposed parking lots are setback further than the 10-foot minimum from non -arterial streets and 5-foot minimum along a lot line required per the Land Use Code. I. Section 3.2.2(K)(1)(a) — Residential Parking Requirements Three -bedroom units must provide two parking spaces per unit. The project proposes 36 units, each with three bedrooms. The proposal meets this requirement. Number of Units aces Re uired S aces Provided 36 t72S(36 units ' 2 spaces per unit 77 Staff Report —Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 11 deeper setback on the north side of County Fair Ln. makes the proposed plan equal to a compliant plan. 3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development Standards: The project complies with all applicable General Development Standards as follows: A. Section 3.2.1(D) — Tree Planting Standards All developments must establish groves and belts of trees along all public streets, in and around parking lots, and in landscape areas within 50' of buildings. Ziegler Townhomes proposes street trees planted at 40' intervals in accordance with City standards, trees planted in clusters on the western property line, and full tree stocking around each building. B. Section 3.2.1(D)(3) — Minimum Species Diversity When a development proposes more than 60 trees, the maximum amount of any one species is 15%. None of the proposed trees will make up more than 15% of the overall tree count. C. Section 3.2.1(E)(3) — Water Conservation All proposed landscaping must be designed to incorporate water conservation materials and techniques, and not exceed 15 gallons/square foot over the site. The proposed landscaping uses low water use plants and has an overall annual water budget of 6.66 gallons/square foot. D. Section 3.2.2(C)(4)(b) — Bicycle Parking Space Requirement Multi -family residential projects must provide one bicycle parking space per bedroom. 60% of these spaces must be in enclosed locations with 40% provided via fixed racks. The project contains 108 bedrooms. The site plan shows 108 bicycle parking spaces. 94 of the spaces are located in the garages of each unit. The remaining 14 spaces are provided via fixed rack. This exceeds the minimum for enclosed spaces and thus meets this standard. E. Section 3.2.2(C)(5) - Walkways Staff Report — Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 10 The applicant requests that the Modification be approved and provides the following justification based upon Criterion 1 (proposal is equal to or better than a compliant plan): Summary of Applicant's Justification for Modification #3: • A lesser setback allows the buildings to be further out of the natural habitat buffer zone. • The development meets the intent of the standard to promote variety, visual interest and pedestrian -oriented streets in residential developments. • The modification is minor when considered from the perspective of the entire development plan. • The building exceeds the requirements of section 3.5.2. • The project is designed to reflect the characteristics of the existing, established residential neighborhood. • The visual impact of the building will be reduced by the proposed landscaping. • This development will greatly improve the vacant lot. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the request for a Modification of Standard to section 3.5.2(E)(2) is justified by the applicable standards in 2.8.2(H)(1). C. The granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good D. The project design satisfies 2.8.2(H)(1): the plan as submitted will promote the general purpose of the standard for which the modification is requested equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standard for which a modification is requested. The applicant is requesting relief to the setback standards for one entire building and the portion of another. Building F is proposed to be setback 10.4 feet from the back of the sidewalk. Portions of Building C are proposed to be as close as 9.5 feet to the back of the sidewalk, widening out to 20 feet near the intersection of Ziegler Rd. and County Fair Ln. This plan could comply by locating the buildings on the south side of County Fair Ln. further back to accommodate these setbacks. This would push the buildings further into the natural habitat buffer zone, however. To mitigate for encroaching into the setback, the applicant proposes enhanced landscaping to visually soften the presence of the buildings. The applicant also proposes a deeper setback on the north side of County Fair Ln. to provide further mitigation. Staff finds the enhanced landscaping and Staff Report —Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 9 have a greater number of windows and doorways, and richer architectural features and materials. By having buildings front on streets, new developments support the town -like pattern envisioned by City Plan. The code would require all of the front doors for buildings A, F, and E to front on to County Fair Lane. This would extend the existing pattern of homes fronting on streets established in Harvest Park to the west. Instead, the proposed plan shows three buildings with front doors oriented to Ziegler Rd. with the remaining three buildings with front doors oriented to a common green space. The principal concern for this development is how pedestrians will experience walking along County Fair Ln. into and out of Harvest Park. For pedestrians coming from the neighborhood or Ziegler Rd., the first things they will see are the front porches and picket fenced yards of the proposed townhomes. This promotes the purpose of this standard by highlighting the entries to the buildings. To further enhance the sides of the buildings, the architecture provides windows and changes in materials to add interest to the building from the street. The landscaping will also screen areas of low interest on the sides of the building to further enhance the presence of the development. For these reasons, staff finds the proposed plan is equal to a compliant plan. Modification #3 Description: The applicant requests a Modification to Section 3.5.2(E)(2) — Residential Building Setbacks, Lot Width and Size to have buildings setback closer than 15 feet away from the right-of-way. Land Use Code Standard Proposed to be Modified (areas underlined and bolded for emphasis): Land Use Code 3.5.2(E)(2): (2) Setback from Nonarterial Streets. The minimum setback of every residential building and of every detached accessorV building that is incidental to the residential building shall be fifteen (15) feet from any public street right-of-way other than an arterial street right-of-way, except for those buildings regulated by Section 3.8.30 of this Code, which buildings must comply with the setback regulations set forth in Section 3.8.30. Setbacks from garage doors to the nearest portion of any public sidewalk that intersects with the driveway shall be at least twenty (20) feet. Summary of Applicant's Justification: n Staff Report —Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 8 Summary of Applicant's Justification for Modification #2: • The standard requires buildings to have street -facing doorways along County Fair Lane. To meet the standard, the buildings would have to be moved north and south. Neither is feasible due to the potential negative impacts of disturbing the wetlands and the natural habitat buffer zone on the south and the infeasibility of locating the buildings to the north due to several existing trees. • The purpose of the standard for which the modification is sought is to "promote variety, visual interest and pedestrian -oriented streets in residential development." The proposed plan in which the buildings do not have street -facing doorways promotes such purpose equally well or better for the following reasons: o The modification is minor and only affects the four buildings along the north and south sides of County Fair Lane. o The proposed alternative plan continues to improve the design, quality and character of new development by exceeding the building standards set forth in Section 3.5. The use of high quality residential building materials, building articulation, projections and recesses, along with pitched roof elements ensures sensitivity to and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. o The street -facing sides of the buildings contain enhanced landscaping with shrubs and ornamental grasses in combination with upright evergreen plantings to break up the mass of the buildings. o In addition, the wall -mounted meters will be screend with walls and ornamental grasses. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the request for a Modification of Standard to section 3.5.2(D)(2) is justified by the applicable standards in 2.8.2(H)(1). A. The granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good B. The project design satisfies 2.8.2(H)(1): the plan as submitted will promote the general purpose of the standard for which the modification is requested equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standard for which a modification is requested. The purpose of the street facing fagade standard is to prevent the sides of buildings dominating the streetscape. Sides of buildings do not promote the same level of pedestrian activity or visual interest than front facades that typically Staff Report — Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 7 The site in question is long and narrow with limited options to provide vehicular access to the site. While the site has 701 feet of frontage on Ziegler Rd., 470 feet of this frontage is located south of the intersection of County Fair Ln. and Ziegler Rd. The minimum access spacing requirements along a two-lane arterial street is 460 feet per the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS). That would mean an access point for this site could be allowed on Ziegler Rd., but this access point would be in the natural habitat buffer zone. Due to this physical constraint, the access for both portions of the site must come from County Fair Ln. A local street that meets LCUASS requires 51 feet of right-of-way. The width of the parcel is approximately 216 feet. That means a local street would encumber 23.6% of the site. After factoring in 15-foot setbacks on either side of the right-of- way, this local street would essentially encumber 37.5% of the site. This would result in small buildable lots that would not continue the pattern of development established in Harvest Park and Sage Creek. The proposed plan meets the code for all but the three most southerly units in Building E. The unit furthest away is a 281-foot walk to the public sidewalk on County Fair Ln. The walkway leading from the unit to County Fair Ln. is direct and continuous and so it meets the intent of the Code. By meeting the intent of the code section, staff finds that the strict application of this section would result in impractical difficulties due to the orientation of the site. Modification #2 Description: The applicant requests a Modification to Section 3.5.2(D)(2) — Street Facing Facades to have buildings setback closer than 15 feet away from the right-of- way. Land Use Code Standard Proposed to be Modified: Land Use Code 3.5.20)(2): Street -Facing Facades. Every building containing four (4) or more dwelling units shall have at least one (1) building entry or doorway facing any adjacent street that is smaller than a full arterial or has on -street parking. Summary of Applicant's Justification: The applicant requests that the Modification be approved and provides the following justification based upon Criterion 1 (proposal is equal to or better than a compliant plan): Staff Report — Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 6 upon the owner of such property, provided that such difficulties or hardship are not caused by the act or omission of the applicant; or (4) the plan as submitted will not diverge from the standards of the Land Use Code that are authorized by this Division to be modified except in a nominal, inconsequential way when considered from the perspective of the entire development plan, and will continue to advance the purposes of the Land Use Code as contained in Section 1.2.2. Any finding made under subparagraph (1), (2), (3) or (4) above shall be supported by specific findings showing how the plan, as submitted, meets the requirements and criteria of said subparagraph (1), (2), (3) or (4). Summary of Applicant's Justification: The applicant requests that the Modification be approved and provides the following justification based upon Criterion 1 (proposal submitted is equal to or better than a compliant plan) and Criterion 3 (physical hardship): Summary of Applicant's Justification to Modification #1: • To meet the standard, the development would have to put a street through the middle of the site, which is impractical. • Each building faces a connecting walkway and there are numerous routes to the sidewalk through the development. • The modification is minor from the perspective of the overall development. • The buildings exceed the standards of 3.5.2. • This development will greatly improve the vacant site. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the request for a Modification of Standard to Section 3.5.2(D)(1) is justified by the applicable standards in 2.8.2(H)(3). A. The granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good B. The project design satisfies 2.8.2(H)(3): by reason of exceptional physical conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situations, unique to such property, the strict application of the standard sought to be modified would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties. A compliant plan would require a street to run north -south through the site with buildings oriented to face this street. Building such a street is impractical given the size and shape of the site. Staff Report —Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 5 2. Compliance with Section 2.8.2(H) of the Land Use Code - Modification of Standards Modification #1 Description: The applicant requests a Modification to Section 3.5.2(D)(1) — Relationships of Dwellings to Streets and Parking to have a unit with a primary entrance more than 200 feet away from the nearest street sidewalk. Land Use Code Standard Proposed to be Modified (areas underlined and bolded for emphasis): (1) Orientation to a Connecting Walkway. Every front facade with a primary entrance to a dwelling unit shall face the adjacent street to the extent reasonably feasible. EverV front facade with a primary entrance to a dwelling unit shall face a connecting walkway with no primary entrance more than two hundred (200) feet from a street sidewalk. Land Use Code Modification Criteria: "The decision maker may grant a modification of standards only if it finds that the granting of the modification would not be detrimental to the public good, and that: (1) the plan as submitted will promote the general purpose of the standard for which the modification is requested equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standard for which a modification is requested; or (2) the granting of a modification from the strict application of any standard would, without impairing the intent and purpose of this Land Use Code, substantially alleviate an existing, defined and described problem of city-wide concern or would result in a substantial benefit to the city by reason of the fact that the proposed project would substantially address an important community need specifically and expressly defined and described in the city's Comprehensive Plan or in an adopted policy, ordinance or resolution of the City Council, and the strict application of such a standard would render the project practically infeasible; or (3) by reason of exceptional physical conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situations, unique to such property, including, but not limited to, physical conditions such as exceptional narrowness, shallowness or topography, or physical conditions which hinder the owner's ability to install a solar energy system, the strict application of the standard sought to be modified would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties, or exceptional or undue hardship Staff Report —Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 4 i : Llewer I ownno171e5 Loninq & 51Te vicin 1 inch = 500 feet Ziegler Townhomes Vicinity Map --- Staff Report —Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 3 Below is a zoning and site vicinity map. Staff Report — Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 Administrative Hearing 03-02-2017 Page 2 public good and that by reason of exceptional physical conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situations, unique to such property, the strict application of the standard sought to be modified would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties. • The Modification of Standard to Section 3.5.2(D)(2) that is proposed with this Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good and the proposal submitted is equal to a compliant plan. • The Modification of Standard to Section 3.5.2(E)(2) that is proposed with this Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good and the proposal submitted is equal to a compliant plan. • The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards of Article 3 — General Development Standards, if the Modification of Standard to Sections 3.5.2(D)(1), 3.5.2(D)(2), and 3.5.2(E)(2) are approved. • The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards located in Division 4.5 Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood (LMN) of Article 4 — Districts. COMMENTS: 1. Background The property was incorporated into the City of Fort Collins as a part of the Weiner Enclave Annexation on March 6, 2007. A previous PDP application for this site was approved and made it to the Final Plan stage but was never recorded. This expired plan called for 22 dwelling units in four buildings on the southwest corner of County Fair Lane and Ziegler Road. The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: Direction Zone District Existing Land Uses North Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Residential South Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Residential LMN East Public Open Lands (POL) High school, community park West Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Residential Fort of MEETING DATE STAFF March 2"d, 2017 Clay Frickey ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROJECT: Ziegler Townhomes, FDP160043 APPLICANT: Cathy Mathis TB Group 444 Mountain Ave. Berthoud, CO 80513 OWNERS: Manhattan Land Company, LLC 772 Whalers Way Fort Collins, CO 80525 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for Project Development Plan/ Final Plan to create a for -sale, single family attached townhome project. There are 6 buildings proposed, with a total of 36 units. All of the units have 3 bedrooms. The buildings will be two stories in height and will contain from four to seven units per building. The overall density of the project will be 8.93 dwelling units per acre. The site is located on 4.029 acres and zoned (LMN) Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ziegler Townhomes, FD P 160036. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff finds the proposed Ziegler Townhomes combined Project Development Plan/Final Plan complies with the applicable requirements of the City of Fort Collins Land Use Code (LUC), more specifically: • The Project Development Plan complies with the process located in Division 2.2 — Common Development Review Procedures for Development Applications of Article 2 — Administration. • The Modification of Standard to Section 3.5.2(D)(1) that is proposed with this Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the Planning Services 281 N College Ave - PO Box 580 - Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 fcgov.com/developmentreview/ 970.221.6750