HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAPLE HILL, PHASE ONE - PDP - 29-00A - CORRESPONDENCE - LEGAL COMMUNICATIONTIMOTHY J. DOW, MBA, JD
PATRICIA T. DOW, CPA, JD, LLM*
MAYO SOMMERMEYER, PC**
OF COUNSEL
• ALSO ADMITTED TO PRACTICE LAW M NEBRASKA
••ALSO ADMITTED TO PRACTICE LAW M W YOMMG
THE Dow LAw FIRM, LLC
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
P.O. BOX 1578
FORT COLLMS, COLORADO 80522-1578
(970) 498-9900
Via Hand Delivery
Ted Shepard
City of Fort Collins Current Planning
281 N. College Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80524
FAX: (970) 498-9966
E-MAIL: dow@dowlawfim.com
January 27, 2003
Re: Project #29-OOA Maple Hill PDP — Type I (LUC)
Our Client: Windsor Reservoir & Canal Company
Dear Mr. Shepard:
N 7 CLOCK TOWER SQUARE
323 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE
FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524
2312 CAREY AVENUE
D M �RT63T 41
JA N 2 8 2003 D
The Windsor Reservoir & Canal Company (WRCC) is the owner of the ditch that
generally runs along the easterly boundary of the referenced project, sometimes known as the
No. 8 Outfall. On behalf of WRCC, I have reviewed the submission as submitted by you with
your Comment Sheet dated January 15, 2003. The drawings and data submitted did not address
the stormwater issues of importance to our client. I was able to work directly with the engineer
and obtain the appropriate drawings and other technical information needed such as the sub -
basin information.
I would like to complement Keith Sheaffer and his team at TST, Inc. Consulting
Engineers for an excellent job in providing the information that we need to make a comfortable
decision concerning the impact of development on our ditch. If all developers and their engineers
were willing to work as closely as these people have with us, the end product would be much
better, well-defined and more certain, and everyone's comfort level would be significantly
enhanced!
I have reviewed drawings 69 of 130 and 56 of 130 on Job #953-003, revision date
11/18/02. I have also reviewed drawings 3-7 of 7 on the same project with the same revision
date. Detailed design and full analysis data was also submitted, particular attention is directed to
the NeoUDS results summary project description: ST-1, being page 1 of 3 — sub -basin
information. The sub -basin information peak flow shows that 10 cfs will burden the ditch.
WRCC hereby approves the drawings as referenced above as to their design and general
configuration as it impacts our ditch. We also approve and agree to accept a stormwater
developed inflow of 10 cfs into the ditch as referenced above.
r
This arrangement will need to be reduced to a formal agreement reflecting a few details
concerning timing of the project, coordination with the ditch company and the consideration to
be paid by the developer at a later date.
From a planning standpoint, if you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate
to get ahold of me.
MS/hb
PC: Tom Dougherty
Keith Sheaffer
Donn Engel
Yours very truly,
MAYO SOMME EYER, P.C.
1l�Iayo Som perm yer