Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
EAGLE CLIFFS - PDP - 22-02 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY
FUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet R. -m x, us TBqviV, Tra4el Time -n CSU Campus Transit Center 5.8 21 48 2.3 Foothills Fashion Mall 2.8 13 34 2.6 Fort Collins High School 3.3 14 37 2.6 Downtown Fort Collins 6.3 22 53 2.4 Total Travel Time 70 172 2.5 Service Level Standards Worksheet Usg�.6'1, bf Gwers awMlied WIRWhelfift Standard Y }� ..5% , the Service Meets Standard Fails Standard Commercial' R", "M /Cbftw6rs"-, � -IN, -- Hours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours x Weekday Frequency of Service 15 minutes 20 minutes x Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x 1 x Peak Load Factor :s 1.2 -.51.2 x 2 of 4 = LOS D t;� Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Bicycle Figure 7. Bicycle LOS Worksheet level of service - connectivity nwdnnan actual proposed base connectivity: C 11 r1 I Al specific connections to priority sites: description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address Fossil. CQeLm pReK C�vruRc J T'p-AtG (PUT 0RG destination area classification p (see text) f-CCCwj( 7t oU S (Y-6 �bcRE�dTto�7 StTI� [Imlmimll p. 20 City of fort Collins Transportation Master Plan U." 0 C is Fa - Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual LOS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: �CUe4L (l)AL41, q A2EA. (enter as many as apply) destination area classification OO (see text) dp`T f p�UYt AG 9T/ YU 1 fQ4AL StT(y description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address tID(;ff t esvis ,50oMR/ Q (6"43op- awt) Wc2Au6R EGEm&N TA R Y 5C(A00 level of service (minimum based on project location classification) Nm'Inw :a�linni7 t4re1 i p�n8� ,iwul Inlersl6 unvlly ntildnnm, Q rA- g P, C- 13 actual TN A 4 proposed Q- A- A I I A- ®©1©1©IMIMI ®MI©I0I=I0l mevnuan ecntal proposed n,i,ililt nn actual proposed p. 18 ��/�� City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual p. ig L.OS Standards for Development Review - Pedestrian Figure 6. Pedestrian LOS Worksheet project location classification: 46C�1eoC WA(. r- IA4 AR,9 A a m [0 is description of applicable destination area within 1,320' including address Fosslt Clzef�K PA 2K CF�ru fL�i AU at It f9e R 640dD 5T. Cu-9nS6rf+ ANN S 6TorU C40eC 4 SouTL+ mr.9 CR-SeUS destination area classification (see text) p F6CR6A r r oN strfT { &SIDB,bItA AREA INgrrruTroN 26CR &A T I Iw ou, T (enter as many as apply) level of service (minimum based on project location classification) Nrmineu :aninuit)• t4M Tailngr riaul Inlernl h unully nnadaes c i3A u/AVIA #.A- A//A proposed A' - A 4 01010101©1 m II IvImlmm ®m1_010imI"0I WITK '3IG.uRt AND `t'AwrGD eQoWS WAtK City of Fort Collins Transportation Master Plan CR32 SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN INFLUENCE AREA N APPENDIX G 4 5' Roundabouts - Unsignalized intersections W orksneet rage ► of i ROUNDABOUTS - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst matt Agency/Co. mjdpe Date Performed 2WO02 Time Period a pm Intersection lemay/southridge greens Jurisdiction fort collins Analysis Year 20 5 I �i4L Project Description am pm Volume Adjustments EB WB NB SB Volume, veh/h 30 35 35 95 LT Traffic PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow rate, veh/h 33 38 38 105 Volume, veh/h 5 0 545 740 TH Traffic PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow rate, veh/h 5 0 605 822 RT Traffic Volume, veh/h 30 65 25 55 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow rate, veh/h 33 1 72 1 27 1 61 Approach Flow Computation Approach Flow veh/h Va veh/h Vae 71 Vaw 110 Van 670 Vas 988 Circulating Flow Computation Approach Flow veh/h Vc veh/h We 965 Von 676 Vcn 143 Vas 76 Capacity Computation EB WB NB SB Upperbound 640 810 1238 1304 Capacity Lower bound 498 645 1028 1088 v/c Ratio Upper bound 0.11 0.14 0.54 0.76 Lower bound 0.14 0.17 0.65 0.91 HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b file:HC:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Matt%2ODelich\Local%2OSettings\Temp\u2kB.tmp 2/8/2002 4-4- 1 Roundabouts - Unsignalized lntersectio& Wo'i"neei' rage i of i ROUNDABOUTS - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst matt Agency/Co. mjdpe Date Performed ,I k2002 Time Period am m Intersection lemay/southridge greens Jurisdiction fortllins Analysis Year 2005 To-z A L Project Description am pm Volume Adjustments EB WB NB SB LT Traffic Volume, veh/h 65 25 40 20 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow rate, veh/h 72 27 44 22 TH Traffic Volume, veh/h 5 10 615 410 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow rate, veh/h 5 11 683 455 RT Traffic Volume, veh/h 45 100 20 15 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow rate, veh/h 50 111 22 16 Approach Flow Computation Approach Flow veh/h Va veh/h Vae 127 Vaw 149 Van 749 Vas 493 Circulatina Flow Computation Approach Flow veh/h Vc veh/h We 504 Vcw 799 Vcn 99 Vcs 82 Capacity Computation EB WB NB SB Upperbound 930 733 1281 1298 Capacity Lower bound 761 578 1067 1083 Upper bound 0.14 0.20 a58 0.38 v/c Ratio Lower bound 0.17 1 0.26 0.70 0.46 HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 b file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Matt%20Delich\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2kB.tmp 2/8/2002 43 Two -Way Stop Control rage 1 ui 1 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY eneral Information ISite Information nal st Imatt Intersection Isouthfidge greenslaccess enc /Co. JMLd2e urisdiction ort collins Date Performed 11127102 knalysis Year 002 005 k r total nal sis Time Period M HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 b file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\ 4att%2ODelich\Local%2OSettings\Temp\u2k7.tmp 2/8/2002 4Z HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: southridge greens/access Jurisdiction: fort collins nits: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 2005 bkgrd total Project ID: 0204 East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: site access Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 90 0 5 60 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Flow Rate, HFR 105 0- 5 70 'Hourly Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type Undivided Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 ,RT Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 'Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles 'Percent Grade (%) Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? 5 10 0.85 0.85 5 11 0 0 n No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 5 16 C(m) (vph) 1499 903 v/c 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.05 Control Delay 7.4 9.1 ' LOS A A Approach Delay 9.1 Approach LOS A ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ' 41 I wo- Way stop control I'dgC 1 U1 L TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed sis Time Period matt mjdpe 1/27/02 am m Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year lemay/southridge greens fort co 200 200 bkgrc total ct Description 0204 West Street: southrid a greens North/South Street: lema VIntersectionOrientation: North -South tud Period hrs : 0.25 cle Volumes and Adjustments Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 35 545 25 95 740 55 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 605 27 101 787 58 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 - - edian Type Two Way Left Turn Lane t H ac�c r RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 onfiguration L T TR L T TR stream Signal 0 0 !nor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 35 0 65 30 5 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 76 1 35 5 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 T Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 onfiguration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR vph) 38 101 41 76 35 40 (m)(vph) 800 960 211 686 169 450 0.05 0.11 0.19 0.11 0.21 0.09 queue length 0.15 0.35 0.70 0.37 0.75 0.29 ntrol Delay [5% 9.7 9.2 26.1 10.9 31.8 13.8 S A A D B D B proach Delay - - 16.2 22.2 proach LOS - - C C Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. I b file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Matt%20Delich\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k2.tmp 2/8/2002 4-0 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period:GD pm 'Intersection: emay/southridge greens Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year,: 2002 2005 bkgrd ,total Project ID: 0204 East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R 'Volume 40 615 20 20 410 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.91 Flow Rate, HFR 45 706 22 21 450 16 'Hourly Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 TWL Median Type TL RT Channelized? 1 2 0 1 2 0 'Lanes Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No ,Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 25 10 100 65 5 45 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 11 117 67 5 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: xistS. No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 'Movement Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 45 21 29 128 67 51 (vph) 1106 885 258 568 281 648 'C(m) v/c 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.23 0.24 0.08 95% queue length 0.13 0.07 0.38 0.86 0.91 0.26 Control Delay 8.4 9.2 20.7 13.2 21.8 11.0 LOS A A C B C B Approach Delay 14.6 17.1 Approach LOS B C ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed nal sis Time Period matt mjdpe 1127102 a m Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year lemay/southridge greens fort colt' 200 2005 kgrrkg ct Description 0204 Street: southrid a reens orth/South Street: lemaection Orientation: North -South tud Period hrs : 0.25 cle Volumes and Adjustments [East/west Street Northbound Southbound ment 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R e 35 545 25 95 740 55 Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 Flow Rate, HFR 38 605 27 101 787 58 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - - 0 Two Way Left Turn Lane - - 0 ,eAG a - edian Type RT Channelized U 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 onfiguration L T TR L T TR U stream Signal 0 0 inor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 35 0 65 30 5 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 76 35 5 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ed Approach N N age 0 0 Channelized LLa 0 0 es 1 1 0 1 1 0 figuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR vph) 38 101 41 76 35 40 (m)(vph) 800 960 97 686 81 321 [5% 0.05 0.11 0.42 0.11 0.43 0.12 queue length 0.15 0.35 1.76 0.37 1.75 0.42 ntrol Delay 9.7 9.2 66.9 10.9 79.7 17.8 LOS A A F B F C pproach Delay - - 30.5 46.7 pproach LOS - - D E c Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1b file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Matt%2ODelich\Local%2OSettings\Temp\u2k2.tmp 2/8/2002 3 �� HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: emay/southridge greens Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary (- Analysis Year: 2002 200 bkgrd tDtal 'Project ID: 0204 East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R 'Volume 40 615 20 20 410 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 45 706 22 21 450 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Movement 7 L Westbound 8 9 T R Eastbound I 10 11 I L T 12 R 'Volume 25 10 100 65 5 45 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 11 117 67 5 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Percent Grade M 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage ' RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 45 21 29 128 67 51 C(m) (vph) 1106 885 154 498 160 549 v/c 0.04 0.02 0.19 0.26 0.42 0.09 95% queue length 0.13 0.07 0.67 1.02 1.86 0.31 Control Delay 8.4 9.2 33.7 14.7 42.8 12.2 'LOS A A D B E B Approach Delay 18.2 29.6 Approach LOS C D ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a 1 3? APPENDIX F ;69 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt gency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: lemay southridge greens 'Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 2005 bkgrd total Project ID: 0204 �East/West Street: southridge greens orth/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 25 545 25 95 740 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 605 27 101 787 42 Percent Heavy Vehicle 0 edian Type TWLTL RT Channelized? anes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L � T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 35 0 65 20 5 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 76 23 5 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Qlxlsts? Flared Approach: No No Storage T Channelized? tanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 'Movement Lane Config L L i L TR I L TR v (vph) 27 101 41 76 23 34 (vph) 811 960 221 686 174 441 ,C(m) v/c 0.03 0.11 0.19 0.11 0.13 0.08 95% queue length 0.10 0.35 0.66 0.37 0.45 0.25 Control Delay 9.6 9.2 25.0- 10.9 28.8 13.8 LOS A A C B D B pproach Delay 15.8 19.9 Approach LOS C C ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a i HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 027/02 Analysis Time Period: pm Intersection: ay/southridge greens Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 2005 bkgrd Project ID: 0204 East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS total Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 40 615 20 20 410 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 45 706 22 21 450 10 Percent Heavy Vehicle -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 25 10 100 50 5 35 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 11 117 52 5 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: xists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 45 21 29 128 52 41 C(m) (vph) 1112 885 259 569 282 626 v/c 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.22 0.18 0.07 95% queue length 0.13 0.07 0.37 0.86 0.66 0.21 Control Delay 8.4 9.2 20.6 13.2 20.6 11.2 LOS A A C B C B Approach Delay 14.5 16.5 Approach LOS B C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a 34 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am p Intersection: lemay southridge greens Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 2005 bkgrd total Project ID: 0204 'East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 25 545 25 95 740 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 605 27 101 787 42 Percent Heavy Vehicle 0 0 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? 'Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No ' Minor Street: Approach Movement 7 L westbound 8 T 9 R Eastbound I 10 11 I L T 12 R 'Volume 35 0 65 20 5 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 41 0 76 23 5 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage 0 Flared Approach: xists? No No Storage ' RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 27 101 41 76 23 34 C(m) (vph) 811 960 103 686 86 307 v/c 0.03 0.11 0.40 0.11 0.27 0.11 95% queue length 0.10 0.35 1.64 0.37 0.97 0.37 Control Delay 9.6 9.2 61.4 10.9 61.5 18.2 'LOS A A F B F C Approach Delay 28.6 35.7 Approach LOS D E ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: lemay/southridge greens Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 2005 bkgrd total Project ID: 0204 East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 40 615 20 20 410 10 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 45 706 22 21 450 10 Percent Heavy Vehicle 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 25 10 100 50 5 35 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 29 11 117 52 5 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage O0 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L- TR v (vph) 45 21 29 128 52 41 C(m) (vph) 1112 885 156 500 162 514 v/c 0.04 0.02 0.19 0.26 0.32 0.08 95% queue length 0.13 0.07 0.66 1.01 1.30 0.26 Control Delay 8.4 9.2 33.3 14.7 37.4 12.6 LOS A A D B E B Approach Delay 18.1 26.5 Approach LOS C D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a i Z 4 APPENDIX E NofWSouth Strut: Lemav Eas/West Stred: Southridge Timc: PM Weatlux: Sunnv Lane 1 EB Lane 2 WB ♦:MOD PM • 517 00 PM Total Vehlcle Count: Delayed e ;oux: ThroughCount: A- Fiore --- kft Stopped Time: - Mn. Sees. for Delay. Traffic Operations PO a" no Filc Name : L&jnw &Smithridgel-10-02 PM DIN Fort Collins Co. tlo528itc Cock : fxxl()0002 Slam Dulc : 01/10/2(x)2 Page No 1 0 10 0.10 0.221 1.15 1.102 3 J ... - 011'd O Lb=£i ZO—SZ—uQC North/South Strad: Lcmay East/West Street: Southridge Time: Noun Wcathcr: Sunny Law 1 EB Lane 2 WD 1 zoo 00 PM - 12:59:0o PM Tow Vehicle _Gourd__ Min. Seta. for Averape Queue. Queue tky": KU mnum Ouem Traffic Operations PO Box 580 File Name : Lcrnm &Southridgcl-10d12 Noon DLY Fort Collins Co. SOME Codc : 1xxxKiW2 Stan Date : 0111012(X12 Page No : I Law, _ Lene 2 � .. Sa 36 58 6:67� 1 7.3288 32 4 _ 0 0 0.07 0.120 1.24 1.208 2 3 60"d Z 1 - Lb=£i ZO-SZ-SEC Traff ic Operations , North/$outh Street: Lemay PO Box 580 Filc Name : Lcuuty &.SouthridgcI-10-02 AM DLY tast[Wcst Streq: Southridge Fort Collies Co. 80520te Code : 00000002 Time: AM StartDatc ' : 01/10/2002 Weathcr: Cloudy Pagc No I _.. 7:30:00 AM - 8:20:00 AM Lane / Lane 2 --� Total VMicN Count: _ 88 120 Delayed Vehlde Ga1rrt: 86 120 Through VehrW Court: 0 Avaaye Stopped Time: ----- - 21.83 14.733� -- Ma>oaam Steppes Tlmo: OS Mon. Seca. For Ddcy _ _ _ ..._ 0 __ 0 A Oume. - 0.54 0.499 Oueua Deeeny. 1_58Lens . k4m mum Queue: m _ 1 1 2 80'd 9ta=£1: ZO-SZ-UEC 11/28/01 City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations Page: 1 10:44:44 700 Wood St. t Fort Collins 970-224-6175 ' •'• Single Channel 15 Minute Site ID : LEMAY/SR WB Date : Oct 16, 2001 Tue Info 1 : SOUTHRIDGE Factor : 1.00 ' Info 2 : W/O LEMAY Lane 1-Normal, Axle, /2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hour 1-wn Hour Graph Starts 0 15 30 45 Total 0 125 AM ---------------------------------------- 12 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 1 2 5 2 3 3 8 16 ***+** 6 8 9 12 13 42 *************** 7 26 36 33 22 117 wrrwrrrrwr*wwwwrrwrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrr*rr 8 19 28 21 19 87 wwrrrwwrwwwwwwwrwwrrrrrwrrrrrw ' 9 11 26 18 16 71 ************************* 10 17 15 17 13 62 +******+**++++*+**+*** 11 15 19 18 10 62 **************wwwrrwrw PM 12 16 8 22 24 70 ««*********************** 1 14 22 15 13 64 **«******************** 2 18 7 20 17 62 *********«************ ' 3 18 29 18 12 77 *+++*********************** 4 7 17 12 21 57 *******+************ 5 16 18 28 23 85 rrwwrwwwrwwwwwwwwfwwrrrrwwwwww ' 6 17 8 22 17 64 wrw*wrrrrwwwwwwwwwwwwr* 7 10 9 7 6 32 ************ 8 8 2 5 4 19 **+**** 9 0 4 1 2 7 *+« ' 10 4 4 1 1 10 *+++ 11 0 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS 1010 AVERAGE 10.5 period 42.1 ' Peak AM Hour is *** 7:00am to 8:00am *** Volume Lane 1 : 117 Peak Hour Factor 0.812 ' Peak / Day Total 0.116 Peak PM Hour is *** 5:15pm to 6:15pm *** Volume Lane 1 : 86 Peak Hour Factor 0.768 Peak / Day Total 0.085 ' LO d 9b:£L ZO-SZ-UEC 11/28/01 City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations page: 1 ' 10:46:12 700 Wood St. Fort Collins 970-224-6175 **• Single Channel 15 minute Site ID : LEMAY/SR ES Date : Oct 16, 2001 Tue , Info 1 : SOUTHRIDGE Factor : 1.00 Info 2 : W/O LEMAY Lane 1-Normal, Axle, /2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hour 1-RB Hour Graph Starts ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 15 30 45 Total 0 75 ' AM - - 12 2 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 0 1 2 ** 4 0 0 0 0 0 * , 5 1 1 1 3 6 '*«* 6 6 2 7 12 27 7 14 19 16 14 63 w**w*w****.*.ww**.•**«www**...**.**** 8 10 35 17 11 73 *******:*w*********w*.*w•w***►*******w+ww♦ ' 9 9 9 3 15 36 **•**::::::::******+. 10 5 11 13 10 39 ***+******************* 11 8 3 10 6 27 PM 12 10 12 8 12 42 **w********wwwwwwwwwwww*+ 1 17 11 8 7 43 2 13 8 12 6 39 3 22 18 10 18 68 4 15 9 5 14 43 5 13 16 16 8 53 6 11 6 10 2 29 *************wwww 7 9 1 1 7 18 *********** 8 0 3 5 4 12 ******* 9 1 1 0 1 3 ** ' 10 0 1 0 1 2 ** 11 0 0 0 2 2 ** ------------------------------- -- TOTALS ----------------------------------------- ' AVERAGE 6.6 period 26.4 Peak AM Hour is *** 7:45am to 8:45am *** volume Lane 1 : 76 Peak Hour Factor 0.543 Peak / Day Total 0.120 Peak PM Hour is *** 3:00pm to 4:OOpm *** Volume Lane 1 : 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.773 Peak / Day Total- : 0.107 90-d 26 9b=£i ZO-SZ-uQC ' 11/28/01 City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations Page: 1 10:4S:16 700 Wood St. Fort Collins 970-224-6175 +•+ Single Channel 15 Minute **+ Site ID : LEMAY/SR SH Date : Oct 16, 2001 Tue Info 1 : LEMAY Factor : 1.00 Info 2 : N/O SOUTHRIDGE Lane 1-Normal, Axle, /2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hour 1-SE Hour Graph Starts 0 15 30 45 Total 0 1100 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AM 12 5 10 3 4 22 1 5 3 0 1 9 2 2 2 3 1 8 3 0 3 4 2 9 4 4 1 5 9 19 5 7 10 19 23 59 *** 6 23 30 70 61 184 *****+*+ 7 75 97 120 127 419 8 116 128 89 110 443 9 84 84 66 84 318 ***«********* 10 93 84 94 94 365 *************** 11 106 128 134 124 492 PM 12 180 121 146 154 601 1 149 140 133 148 570 *********************** 2 129 146 153 158 586 3 168 232 202 173 775 4 228 216 204 217 865 5 278 255 260 224 1017 ***********************`*****ww«*+*►**** 6 220 196 166 175 757 7 115 127 106 82 430 ***************** 8 108 94 106 85 393 9 61 52 52 46 211 ********* 10 29 31 26 22 108 11 15 17 11 4 47 ** ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ TOTALS 8707 AVERAGE 90.7 period 362.8 Peak AM Hour is *** 11:00am to 12:00pm *** volume Lane 1 492 Peak Hour Factor 0.918 Peak / Day Total 0.057 Peak PM Hour is *** 5:00pm to 6:00pm *** volume Lane 1 : 1017 Peak Hour Factor 0.915 Peak / Day Total 0.117 SO'd J 9V;El ZO-SZ-SEC 11/28/01 City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations Page: 1 , 10:44:14 700 Wood St. Fort Collins 970-224-6175 *** Single Channel 15 Minute *•* Site ID : LEMAY/SR NB Date : Oct 16, 2001 Tue ' Info 1 : LEMAY Factor : 1.00 Info 2 : S/O SOUTHRIDGE Lane 1-Normal, Axle, /2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hour 1-NB Hour - Graph Starts -------------------------------------------------- 0 15 30 45 Total 0 800 ' AM - - 12 4 5 3 0 12 * 1 3 0 1 2 6 ' 2 0 1 0 5 6 3 3 1 2 4 10 4 1 2 2 11 16 + 5 15 19 24 41 99 *++*** , 6 28 62 92 118 300 ***************** 7 143 198 200 201 742 8 180 193 163 124 660 9 108 93 99 87 387 10 97 80 72 76 325 ****************** 11 70 70 79 81 300 PM 12 84 84 103 103 374 1 99 96 95 86 376 ++****+************** 2 112 89 118 115 434 3 86 105 116 109 416 **********++***+******* 4 128 160 159 148 595 5 168 164 175 147 654 6 125 114 113 98 450 *+*****+********+******** 7 65 58 57 46 226 ************* 8 39 37 37 37 150 *+******* 9 41 27 26 14 108 10 13 14 16 10 53 *** 11 12 5 9 4 30 ** TOTALS ----------------------------------------- 6729 --------------------------- AVERAGE 70.1 period 280.4 Peak AM Hour is *** 7:15am to 8:15am *** Volume Lane 1 : 779 Peak Hour Factor 0.969 Peak / Day Total 0.116 Peak PM Hour is *** 4:45pm to 5:45pm +*+ Volume Lane 1 : 655 Peak Hour Factor 0.936 Peak / Day Total 0.097 b0'd Z4 9v=£i zo-9Z-uvr CRY of Fort Collins Traffic Operations 970-224-8176 Study Name: Lantay and Southridge 10-14-01, Signal Warrants - Summary �I,,te : I1IMI boo No soo a E 400 r 900 m s 200 e 100 13 14 rN MEMO Four Hour Warrant monsoon INCION EHNEN. NOMMEEN as ° zoo - -- 400 Ow ao0 1000 1200 1400 Major Street - Total of Both Directions (VPH) Analysis of &Hour Volume Warrants (Mai Crit a Major Criteria, Min Crit = Minor Criteria): ism 1800 "No again Mya_ Tom Hqhw Vol Miwr ar Myw CAI vft --a 1 MMw ed Mods? Myer Cr0 w.r.k 2 Mk w Crtt Mggb? Myer Cgs Wwrot a Mien Cra Mggb? 00*0 31 0 E6 0ea4o 20040 - 910449 10040 - 720-W 100.410 — ot:oo 16 1 wa 0064b 2011Ae — 10040 ta.ib — 725440 wb-ft — 62M 14 1 Ea 600410 200-W — 000-10 100410 — 720tio 100440 — 03M 10 2 Ea 000a10 2OP40 — 90040 100A0 — 720410 80-ft — 04:00 30 2 We 0004b 20040 — ON440 101 b — 720a10 10040 — 00:00 140 10 Wa 00040 200Jb — 000-41e 100416 — 7204" 100a10 WAS 4" 02 we 000410 200-No — 000-10 IGGAO — 720ab 100-No — a oe 1,ta1 It? V a -4000ftO.. 2064a Myer 06w+u 1411J 906 ' "I&raa 100410 Moo► 00:00 1,tea a wa . ids`, 200A0 Myer "iwyes Isfi-w Myer fwrm 1i0-10 mew 0fA0 700 71 Wa '01►,asr: M r$n Myer 000400 W0ib — 7204b 100440 — "to ae 02 vra ;: 1 ' . M0 Ua Myw 006ae U%Ac — 720-ft W410 11:00 702 a wa 064%0 200Jb Myw 00o1fb 1oa-ft - 1law.'. W-ft Mow 12:00 070 7o We 200410 Moor wo-r+r ""M maw twft ` looaw Mya 13:00 "1 04 was ;M eo 20040 Myw .:7 &Y" 10540 maw ?MY" 100a10 mew 14:00 t.M 02 wa XN"JO Myer l00=1►p laeaan Myer tM.t►M 100aoo 41ow 10:00 1."1 n Yra � ' 200JJo Mya M�'� 1aa410 MyOr l��1► . ?taste Mop 10A0 1,400 07 Wa 200410 VAW M"as 1004b Moor .1w.v4M. 19"b now 1700 101 ate WB ' lloo ia.-. 200ai0 Myw t6ra 100A0 Moor 1l"Oft ` 100-10 M" wo 7N407 44 WE > ,' .,., 200-M MdW 11M6Y40 100Ab Luiw 'r&r00. 16&&10 &Uw tlao 000 32 Wa aiMf W MAD maw 0004N0 no - 7t0410 100�fo - Ism 043 to via 000-10 =0440 — 000-10 100ad0 — 720'N0 "bift — 21:00 310 7 Wa 000 4b 200-ft — M 41D 100410 — 720db 14040 — nm 181 10 we eooaw 200-N0 — 90e449 10040 — 720-N0 100-b — 23M 77 2 E9 NO -No 200-10 — soo." 100-m — 7204o 100aio — Z £O"d SV=£Z ZO-SZ-uwr City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations e70-22"175 Study Nam: Lamy and Southridge 10-194H Signal Warrants - Summary P �age � e : ;tM10101 Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches Mo►tbbound: Lamay Number of Lanes Approach oa.40 Total Approachch Vo u me:.6,728 Soutbbound: Lemay Number of lanes: 2 Approach Speed Total Approach V me: 8,707 Warrant Summary (urban values apply.) Eastbound: Southridge Number of Lanes: 2 Total Approach Volume: $33 Westbound: Southridge Number of Lanes: 2 Total Approach Volume: 1,010 Warrant i - Minimurn Vehicular Volume ........... ............ .................. .......... ».... ............ ».... ............. Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 8 are needed Warrant 2 - tntarruption of Continuous Traffic ................................ ».»........ ............... ».......... »... Not satisfied Required volumes reached for 1 hours, 8 are needed Warrmt 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume ............... ...... _.................. .... ....»..... ».. ... ».... »..... Not Satisfied Required 4 Hr pedestrian volume reached for 0 hour(s) and the single hour volume for 0 hour(s) Warrant 4 - School Crossing ............................ »................................. ...... ..... ....... ................. ........ Not Satisfied Number of gaps > .0 seconds 0 exceeds the number of minutes in the crossing period 0. Warrant 8 - Progressive Movernerrt....................................... »............................................ »....».... Not Satisfied No adjacent coordinated signals are present Warrant 6 - Accident Experience .......................................................... ........................... Not Satisfied ..... .......... Number of accidents 0 is less than minimum (5). Volume minimums are not met. Warrant 7 - Systems Warrant ........... .._................................................... »..................................... Satisfied Major Route conditions met. Volume requirements met. Warrant 6 - Combination of Via rratets........»..... .................................. ........»..._................. ........... Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 8 are needed Warrant 8 - four Hour Volumes .._ .... »....................................................................»»....»............ Not Satisfied Number of hours volumes exceed minimum U < minimum required (4) Warrant 10 - Peak Hour Delay.....».................................................................................................. Not Satisfied Total approach volumes and delays on minor street do not exceed minimums for any hour. Warrant11 -Peak Hour Volume .......................................................».......................................... Not Satisfied Volumes do not exceed minimums for any hour. ZO"d ` 5b=£i ZO-SZ-UEC A g_AM -W? w�-Qm-wo J a 600 I— v 500 wQ 400 �a. o W 300 p 200 FIGURE 4-5. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT 0WEEMEEMINE,, OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE MOORE ��;�_—►�si■■■ '� =�wmommommimmmminom = 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH `NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESH DLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER w THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STIT APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. co w AM -no ?M- 0qs y ou-rq I c&;MQ Y/ soc)Tgf Iv(; c�EFA) Zoos o-tae, o2AF(=l � CL 600 wf3_ArA-►3s wQ 500 w 3- per- �av w 400 �CL- o w 300 200 o G cg-AM-90 = 400 600 800 C�.'�'M' �� MAJOR STREET - x m co w FIGURE 4-5. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT eon EmmmommommNEW 1000 1 1200 14001 1600 1800 TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH "NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRES OLD VOLUME FOR(PITH MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES ND 100 VPH APPLS AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STR T APPROACHING ONE LANE. AM-III5 SouT�+ CE�A� �0uc;y- 09C-&-AJ S Zoos GACI::�Ce60ub APPENDIX D m Table 4-3 Fort Cnllins IfliOntnr Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersectional Land Uve.(irom structure plan) Commercial Other corridors within corridors lrnerseart type , ;; Mixed use Low density mixed All other - " ' districts use residential areas Signalized D E- D C intersections overall Stop sign control NIA F" F-- E (arteriaUlocat--any approach leg) Stop sign control NIA C C C (collectorAocal— any approach leg) mitigating measures required " considered normal in an urban environment Page 4-22 Lorimer County Urban Area Street Standard January 2,2001 1I? UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -Service Average Total Delay seclve6 A <10 B >10and<<15 C > 15 and _< 25 D >25and <35 E >35and <50 F > 50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Levelof--Service Average Total Delay sec/veh A <10 B >10and <20 C >20and <<35. D > 35 and _< 55 E >55and <80 F > 80 11 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a- TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: lemay southridge greens Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customar Analysis Year, 2002 2005 bkgrd total Project ID: 0204 East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 415 14 93 550 38 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 461 15 98 585 40 Percent Heavy Vehicle 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 13 1 62 17 3 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 1 72 19 3 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M0 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 1 L 1 0 TR 1 1 L 0 TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR 1 L TR v (vph) 11 98 15 73 19 10 C(m) (vph) 966 1097 311 748 247 451 v/c 0.01 0.09 0.05 0.10 0.08 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.29 0.15 0.32 0.25 0.07 Control Delay 8.8 8.6 17.2 10.3 20.8 13.2 LOS A A C B C B Approach Delay 11.5 18.2 Approach LOS B C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a 6 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 27/02 Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: emay/southridge Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 2005 bkgrd Project ID: 0204 ,East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS greens total Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicle Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? 'Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 27 490 9 17 285 11 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.91 31 563 10 18 313 12 1 2 0 L T TR No 1 2 0 L T TR No (Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R ,Volume 11 10 100 51 6 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 11 117 53 6 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Percent Grade (�) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: fists? No No Storage tanes T Channelized? 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 31 18 12 128 53 26 'C(m) (vph) 1246 1010 347 656 369 636 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.20 0.14 0.04 95% queue length 0.08 0.05 0.11 0.72 0.50 0.13 Control Delay 8.0 8.6 15.7 11.8 16.4 10.9 LOS A A C B C B Approach Delay 12.2 14.6 Approach LOS B B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am Intersection: lemay/southridge greens Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customar Analysis Year: 2002 2005 bkgrd total Project ID: 0204 East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 415 14 93 550 38 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 461 15 98 585 40 Percent Heavy Vehicle 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 13 1 62 17 3 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 1 72 19 3 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Oxists? Flared Approach: No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 11 98 15 73 19 10 C(m) (vph) 966 1097 186 726 152 327 v/c 0.01 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.03 95% queue length 0.03 0.29 0.26 0.33 0.42 0.09 Control Delay 8.8 8.6 26.0 10.5 32.0 16.4 LOS A A D B D C Approach Delay 13.2 26.6 Approach LOS B D HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a '4- HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: matt Agency/Co.: mjdpe Date Performed: 1/27/02 Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: emay/southridge 'Jurisdiction: fort collins Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2002 2005 bkgrd Project ID: 0204 East/West Street: southridge greens North/South Street: lemay Intersection Orientation: NS greens total Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 27 490 9 17 285 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.91 'Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 563 10 18 313 12 Percent Heavy Vehicle 0 0 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? 'Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 11 10 100 51 6 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 11 117 53 6 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Percent Grade (%)�l 0 0 Median Storage 0 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage ' RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound 'Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 31 18 12 128 53 26 (vph) 1246 1010 248 611 256 537 'C(m) v/c 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.05 95% queue length 0.08 0.05 0.15 0.78 0.76 0.15 Control Delay 8.0 8.6 20.3 12.4 22.7 12.0 'LOS A A C B C B Approach Delay 13.1 19.2 Approach LOS B C ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a 1 11 APPENDIX C J Traffic Operations Nonh/South Street: Lemav PO Bois 580 tilt Na1t1c : Lemav &Southridgcl-10-02 EnYwcst Street: Southridgc Fort Collins Co. 80522 Site Code : 000001102 Timc: PM Stan Uatc : 01/10l20112 Weather: Cloudy Pagc No i .._ _. Groups Printed- Urmhn W _ SOU111bourid V400 1 Norodmund e Sprt Time I RigM I Thru F Lefl Peels Rtgd I Thru I Let, I Peels Right Thru Left Peels R10M I Thm I Left I Pads Int. l F_ Total I 0&30 PM 7 131 22 15 0 2 0 2 104 4 U 3 0 4 0 294 04:46 PM 11 125 21 0 15 1 2 0 3 99 1_ 0 1 Total 18 259 43 0 30 t 4 0 5 203 5 _ 0 4 0 288 0 4 0 8 0 286 05.00 PM 10 144 27 0 17 0 5 0 5 99 0 0 2 2 5 01 316 05:15 PM 10 147 23 0 15 0 4 0 4 113 5 1 0 1 • 0 327 Grand Tdal 38 550 93 0 62 1 13 0 14 415 10 1 6 3 17 0 1223 Apprch % 5.6 80.8 13.7 0.0 81.6 1.3 171 0.0 3.2 94.3 2.3 0.2 23.1 11.5 05.4 0.0 Total % 31 46.0 .7.6 0.0I 5.1 0.1 1.1 0.01 1.1 33.9. 0.8 - 0.11 0.5 02 1A array Out In TOW r� R91 1f75 L SSO to 1 0 Rgnt Thru Left Pak •' 1 L+ 1• a ,t: N nOQ002430.00PM �� o n 1 1'1=26is 00 PM r- 1 e n 511q �Qa 41 I 14 Left Irdu R" Prh fO 4151 141 ®L f ( out - Inn loitlamf 0.0 8b=£i ZO-SZ-SEC Traffic Operations Worth/South Street: Lentay PO BOX 580 File Nam : Umay t2SouthndgeI-luau F.astMest Street: Southridge Fort Collins Co. 80522 Site Code (KX)O(1(102 Tia1c. Noon Start Date : 01/10/2(X)2 Wcalhm Cloudy Page No 1 _. Groups Pr61tad- L1 uNftd F-swTffm Soumound Wev"mund Morthturld E&SUMU,d RigW j Thtu L411 Peels Rgtt 1 Thru leR Peels RON' Thru I lMl Peels RiyN Thlu Left I Peels T m 12:00 PM 11 96 13 0 11 2 1 0 2 61 5 0 3 1 4 0 209 12AS PM 8 59 15 0 13 2 3 0 2 57 2 0 0 2 2 0 185 12:30 PM 0 48 10 0 16 3 2 0 1 61 1 0 4 0 4 2 161 12:45 PM 8 62 12 0 19 0 3 0 0 80 2 01 2 0 1 0 189 TOM 38 264 50 0 rA 7 9 0 5 259 10 0 9 3 tt 2 724 Grand TOW 36 254 50 O 59 7 9 O b 259 10 O 9 3 11 2 724 Appmh% 10.3 75.4 14.3 00 I 7317 9.3 12.0 MOO I 1.8 94.5 3.8 00 36.0 12.0 44.0 8.0 I Tow % 5-0 38 5 6.9 0 0 8.1 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.7 35.8 1.4 0.0 1.2 0.4 15 0.31 .may (ko In Taal r 3n1 L-41 1. sm RUN Ttn Ldn F%m ,� T T a ?" O r w 2 Noh a p,teaaea „moo vu� 1111 0Q 1211 OD PM - Q r w N r UIILartbO � P I ti V w a r l� LA( TIwu R nl PaU 101 Aif 51 0 I r M2i 1 2741 QR in Total ens Zi'd �O Lb=£i ZO-SZ-SEC Traffic Operations North/.%dh Stred: Lemay PO Box 580 File Name : Umay &Southridl eI-10-02 East/West Stint: Soulhridgc Fort Collins Co. 80522 She Code : 00000002 Time: AM Start Date : 01/10/2002 Weathcr: Cloudy Page No 1 _ Greupc Pentad- Ono"Ibd `en"y SaAhrid°e . _ Lem" 1 S°`AMid°e SwMEound_ WegOowrd NoMbou nd EastbeuM l Start Tune Right Thru Lett Pods Right I TMu� Pella Right Thru Left Pella R O _ Thru I Lell ! Pede iM Taal _ ___ 0 :�30 AM 3 83 7 0 41 3 9 0 4 145 3 0 I 1 1 17 0 297 OT45 AM _. 2 66 3 0 22 1 0 0 1 125 2 0 2 0 12 0 236 . TOW 5 129 10 0 63 4 9 0 5 270—__ 5 0 3 1 29 0 533 MOO AM 3 81 2 0 25 5 2 0 3 123 19 01 9 4 9 0 286 08:15 AM 3 75 5 0 12 1 0 0 1 97 3 0 6 1 13 0 219 Grand Total 11 285 17 0 100 10 11 0 9 490 27 0 20 8 51 0 1037 Apprch% 3.5 91.1 5.4 0.0 826 0.3 9.1 0.0 1.7 93.2 5.1 0.0 2&0 7.8 66.2 00 TOW 96 7 1 o. 1.7 27.5 "0 001 9-8 1.0 1.> 0.0 1 0.9 47.3 2.81 0 0 1 1.9 0.8 4.9 tenuy Out in Tow 611 313 L 111 2e51 171 01 RIOw UR Pods 41 1 4 N op O m tuonn y � � nonooz e:1, ao wa � LLLJJJ O lht6oiRad n I�'Iq a o 41 ? r Ldn THu R9N Pads 7T( 401�� ( 316( s1e n (%a In TOW 00 Lb=£i ZO-9Z-uwv APPENDIX B U i I cCG CEVGrL OF- '3GP- C� t o 12,(-r (J 'DSs-ri.jAT lO u S O- Zs Ammo-5 PUP,LlL e 40-orc. S - o aV 1?EC V-& A7roOu - ``OSV(ei2EEK QA2e.) c5src - rjeAiL- eOA414. olam6a400b (?oar)weee r Ae_ -- �0 •u j!57- 147 s1 Attachment "B" Transportation Impact Study Pedestrian Analysis Worksheet A2eA YP- - O-rime- List the pedestrian destinations within 1320' (1.5 miles for schools) of the project boundary in the spaces above. The pedestrian Level of Service for the facility/corridor linking these destinations to the project site will be based on the directness, continuity, types of street crossings, walkway surface condition, visual interest/amenity, and security of the selected route(s). 1- po-s S t e- C 2 EcrrK Pig 12(Z 2 - MteAa40-u7- 26rS(t)ENTtAL 3 — Ee t o•a 8e76f CtFU OC4 ¢ E H. �c+-E . C? O ,ZS Co 5 — SouTH �I�CE CP—T&�US COLF l�oue5 Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 StUaY LrMIz«7067 Z003 3ACK-6790UND r _C3c- '� \ �- �Lj �' V 0 r N sRar3 o- kn V .IMPA/0/ vooenr- ,4,uD sourg oti L6'AaY bo No-r ANAc.Yod AnvY OTt4E,e l xn�zg&c-rw) 6' f2iP -rDt45-7r(2jRUTroA,) _ (?CQL("ljKj ,9vii ) rm d-- ADM 35� ' G sq OAJ �U3&1] %CQ.UA t rGNS� �ti ovT PM OUT za ( 3 14 i 3 7 35 3 5— 25- Z IZ 3 Attachment "A" Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions Project Information Project Name �AGCE CctFFS Project Location 5L) CIO ak r of Lsa T S6�"CU TISAssumpt,ons Type of Study Full: o Intermediate: Study Area Boundaries North: 5ouTaRtbGrrIry South:5owrof,D 'S Graw East: Z,&MAY West: St re Aeeg5S Study Years g� Le, 4 _ " Short Range: >; 2 00 $ Long Range: 2II=. Future Traffic Growth Rate 4e-1Ate -1 Z - SeoT►R�DC AI Study Intersections 1. All access drives 5. 2.46MAY 50ur*9tbGBQe9rU 6. 3. 7. 4. g. Time Period for Study AM. 7:00-9:00 I PM: 4:00-6:0 Sat Noon: ,V o Trip Generation Rates AT-rA r-" CD S T6 Trip Adjustment Factors Passby: M/A ti / Captive /A Market: Overall Trip DistributionATYA caeb North GOy South 3U % FE tA1%O A West 10 Mode Split Assumptions A/ 1A Committed Roadway Improvements Other Traffic Studies FOSSIL Cf-fie<c A✓zK Areas Requiring Special Study Date: JAN uAF- y 141 '�200 Z Traffic Engineer: /4A T -r - J is t. t' C Local Entity Engineer: Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards January 2, 2001 2 APPENDIX A ' IV. CONCLUSIONS This study assessed the impacts of Eagle Cliffs on the short range (2005) street system in the vicinity of the proposed development. As a result of this analysis, the following is concluded: ' The development of Eagle Cliffs is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint. At full development, Eagle Cliffs will ' generate approximately 353 daily trip ends, 30 morning peak hour trip ends, and 35 afternoon peak hour trip ends. - Currently, the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection operates 1 acceptably with stop sign control. In the short range (2005) future, a signal will not likely be ' warranted at the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection. Signal warrant analyses should be conducted periodically. In the short range (2005) background traffic future, the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection will operate acceptably. In the short range (2005) future, given full development of Eagle Cliffs and an increase in background traffic, the South Lemay/Southridge Greens and Southridge Greens/Eagle Cliffs Access intersections will operate acceptably. The short range (2005) ' geometry is.shown in Figure 8. Acceptable level of service is achieved for pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes based upon the measures in the multi -modal transportation guidelines. 19 some time. Two approaches were considered. One was that since acceptable pedestrian LOS would be achieved when the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection was signalized, this would satisfy the pedestrian LOS requirement. The second considered the fact that, while this area is in a "school walking area," there will not be any student crossings of South Lemay Avenue since the service area of Werner Elementary School is not east of South Lemay Avenue. Therefore, consideration could be given to the fact that the area type for all other land uses would be "other." The minimum level of service for "other" is C for all measured categories. As such, the level of service C for street crossings is achieved without signalization at the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection. The Pedestrian LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix G. A crosswalk should be painted across South Lemay Avenue in order to achieve level of service C for street crossings without a signal. When the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection is signalized, the street crossings level of service will be B. It is concluded that acceptable pedestrian level of service is/will be achieved. Bicycle Level of Service Based upon Fort Collins bicycle LOS criteria, there are two destination areas within 1320 feet of Eagle Cliffs. These are Fossil Creek Park and the trail adjacent to Fossil Creek Park. Eagle Cliffs will have direct connectivity to bike lanes on South Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard. The bicycle LOS worksheet is provided in Appendix G. With bike lanes on both of these streets, level of service A connectivity is achieved. Transit Level of Service Currently, there is no transit service in the area. In the future, transit service will be improved. In the future, there will be 30 minute transit service on South Lemay Avenue. It is anticipated that the level of service will be in the D category with implementation of the City's Transit Development Plan. A future transit level of service worksheet is provided in Appendix G. 18 T N m � 00 E c Q --a* - Denotes Lane SHORT RANGE 2005 GEOMETRY i ) ' 17 Southridge Greens Boulevard Figure 8 these analyses are provided in Appendix F. The key intersections will operate acceptably. The short range (2005) geometry is shown in Figure 8. The South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection was analyzed as a roundabout using the short range (2005) total peak hour traffic (Figure 7). The single -lane roundabout analysis technique, as contained in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, was used. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix F. This technique does not calculate level of service or delay to the entering traffic. Instead, it provides a volume/capacity (v/c) ratio for each entering leg. The capacity is expressed as an upper and lower bound. In the case of this intersection, the v/c ratios would indicate acceptable levels of service (C or better) for all legs in the morning and afternoon peak hours. Emissions analyses of other intersections indicate that in all cases, the roundabout alternative will result in lower emissions. This conclusion is easily applied to this intersection, since, in most cases, the entering vehicles on all legs will not be stopped. Data indicates that the accident rate at the roundabout will be less than that at a stop sign controlled or signalized intersection. Accidents at roundabout intersections are typically much less severe than those at conventional intersections. Since there is not a signal, nor is a signal warranted at this intersection, pedestrians will find that speeds will be much slower at a roundabout. However, there will be some out of direction pedestrian travel, since they will not be crossing any of the streets right at the intersection itself. All of the streets in this area are "finished" to their intended respective cross sections. The roundabout will likely require additional right-of-way in all four quadrants of the intersection, depending upon the ultimate design. This may have a negative impact on the existing homes in the northwest and southeast quadrants of the intersection. It may also have a negative impact on the Eagle Cliffs property. In light of the above considerations, this intersection is not a likely candidate for conversion to a roundabout intersection. Pedestrian Level of Service Discussions were held with Fort Collins Transportation Planning staff regarding pedestrian and bicycle level of service analysis. Appendix G shows a map of the area that is within 1320 feet of Eagle Cliffs. There will be five pedestrian destinations within a quarter mile of Eagle Cliffs. These are: 1) future Fossil Creek Park, 2) Miramont, 3) St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Church, 4) Southridge Greens Golf Course, and 5) Southridge Greens residential area. Werner Elementary School is within one mile of Eagle Cliffs. This site is in an area termed "school walking area." The minimum level of service for "school walking area" is B for all measured categories, except for visual interest and amenities which is C. In the pedestrian LOS scoping meeting it was determined that level of service B for "street crossings" could not be achieved without signalization. However, the signal may not be warranted for 16 TABLE 4 Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Operation S�i^'t g,.itr t..y±r.'Fh 'a +§'i""a lTl6It N Pr 1 K'§`"t e f�.SC VX: e�tG' p`j W`� F nY K X �3';�'iic lR�yW.L•.iN Y. sYr x Ay/'. y"s.sy i'�1y jy.'"Gti S. Lemay/Southridge Greens (stop sign) (No Median Storage) EB LT E F EB T/RT B C EB APPROACH D E WB LT D F WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH C D NB LT A A SB LT A A S. Lemay/Southridge Greens (stop sign) (One Vehicle Median Storage) EB LT C D EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH C C WB LT C D WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH B C NB LT A A SB LT A A Southridge Greens/Eagle Cliffs (stop sign) NB LT/RT A A WB LT A A 15 TABLE Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Operation -a LAM, NU, iv S. Lemay/Southridge Greens (stop sign) (No Median Storage) EB LT E F EB T/RT B C EB APPROACH D E WB LT D F WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH C D NB LT A A SB LT A A S. Lemay/Southridge Greens (stop sign) (One Vehicle Median Storage) EB LT C D EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B C WB LT C C WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH B C NB LT A A SB LT A A 14 �\60166 90�50 �s NpM o 100/55 `r' o NOM w ON N >,a) _EQ (D J Q O LO C LO o o 100/65 `I- N 10/0 25/35 65/30 ,/ Southridge ( Greens 5/5 Boulevard 45/30 o o qq U') N co --•-- AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2005) TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7 13 0 v 0 H cc c H of --a— AM/PM T� 3Ec U) J Q JcM / -a*NOM 15/7 NOM —� 7/4 SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4- N Southridge Greens Boulevard Figure 6 12 co E J C L j 5a 0 U) 0 It C LO 100/65 o o IT IT CN -�— 10/0 25/35 50/20 --/4( ( . 5/5 —� 35/25 LO ►n Lr)I � N T -a*— AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehides SHORT RANGE (2005) BACKGROUND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N Southridge Greens Boulevard Figure 5 11 Background Traffic Projections Figure 5 shows the short range (2005) background traffic projections. Background traffic projections for the short range future horizon was obtained by reviewing the NFRRTP, the Fossil Creek Park Transportation Impact Study, and contacting Fort Collins Transportation Planning staff. Trip Assignment Trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the street system. The assigned trips are the resultant of the trip distribution process. Figure 6 shows the site generated peak hour traffic assignment. Figure 7 shows the total (site plus background) short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Signal Warrants As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at any location unless warrants are met according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Based upon the short range peak hour traffic forecasts, a signal will not be warranted at the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection. Appendix D contains the peak hour signal warrant analysis. The City of Fort Collins conducted a comprehensive signal warrant study at this intersection in Fall 2001. The results of this analysis is also provided in Appendix D. This analysis indicates that Warrant 7-System Warrant is met at the present time. This warrant will continue to be met into the future. The major street volume is met for a number of warrants, however the minor street volume is not met for enough hours of the day. This intersection should be monitored and additional periodic signal warrant studies should be conducted. Operation Analysis Capacity analyses were performed at the South Lemay/Southridge Greens and Southridge Greens/Eagle Cliffs Access intersections. The operations analyses were conducted for the short range analysis, reflecting a year 2005 condition. ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 5 and the existing geometrics, the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection operates in the short range (2005) background traffic future as indicated in Table ' 3. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix E. The South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection will operate acceptably. ' Using the traffic volumes shown in Figure 7 and the existing geometrics, the South Lemay/Southridge Greens and Southridge Greens/ Eagle Cliffs Access intersections operate in the short range (2005) total traffic future as indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms for 1 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION a� Q N t 0 IR cc 0 100 Southridge Greens Boulevard OR 0 0 dM CR32 SCALE: 1 "=1000' Figure 4 9 SITE PLAN 1 W D Z W Q Q W J H D 0 U) A& N SCALE: 1 "=200' 8 Figure 3 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ' Eagle Cliffs is a proposed residential development, located west of South Lemay Avenue and south of Southridge Greens Boulevard in Fort Collins. Figure 3 shows a site plan of Eagle Cliffs. The short range ' analysis (Year 2005) includes development of Eagle Cliffs and an appropriate increase in background traffic. Since this is an intermediate level transportation impact study, a long range analysis is not required. The site plan shows two public accesses to Eagle Cliffs. The primary access will be from Southridge Greens Boulevard at a T- intersection, approximately 400 feet west of South Lemay Avenue. There will also be an access to Southridge Greens Boulevard, approximately 200 feet west of South Lemay Avenue. This access will be a right-in/right- out access. There is an existing median that will enforce the operation of this right-in/right-out access. Trip Generation Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development such as this upon the existing and proposed street system. Trip generation information contained in Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE was used to estimate trips that would be generated by the proposed/expected uses at this site. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation on a daily and peak hour basis. Trip generation equations ' were used to calculate the estimates shown in Table 2. TABLE 2' Trip Generation '��,R.,e-i..>``�f-:`. L?a!3#'„�OFds -:xr�'_'.?u a,T,r &►iele;.fn, �sRatex�'UiRy aRete 230 Six-plex Townhomes 18 D.U. 8.42 152 0.12 2 0.61 11 0.55 10 0.27 5 230 Patio Homes 25 D.U. 8.02 201 0.12 3 0.57 14 0.52 13 0.26 7 Total 353 5 25 23 12 Trip Distribution Directional distribution of the generated trips was determined for Eagle Cliffs based upon the distribution of the existing and future trip productions for these types of land uses. Figure 4 shows the trip distributions used for the short range (2005) analysis future. Rates derived from equations Transit Facilities There are no existing transit routes within 1320 feet of this I site. TABLE I Recent (2002) Peak Hour Operation InUo varsed nQ-,,,W S. Lemay/Southridge Greens (stop sign) (No Median Storage) EB LT C D EB T/RT B C EB APPROACH C D WB LT C D WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH B B NB LT A A SB LT A A S. Lemay/Southridge Greens (stop sign) (One Vehicle Median Storage) EB LT C C EB T/RT B B EB APPROACH B C WB LT C C WB T/RT B B WB APPROACH B B NB LT A A SB LT A A [A hour traffic shown in Figure 2, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. A description of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and a table showing the Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards (Intersections) are also provided in ' Appendix C. The South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection operates acceptably during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. This analysis assumes a painted center median in South Lemay Avenue, but no ' vehicle storage in that median for left -turning vehicles from Southridge Greens Boulevard. In the morning peak hour, the calculated delay is within three seconds of the average stopped delay that was observed at this intersection. In the afternoon peak hour, the calculated delay on ' the westbound leg is approximately four seconds higher than the average stopped delay that was observed, and the calculated delay on the eastbound leg is approximately 14 seconds higher than the average stopped delay that was observed. It would appear that minor street vehicles (left turns) are utilizing the center painted median of South Lemay Avenue to execute two-step left turns. If the analysis is run ' with provision of vehicle storage (one vehicle) in the center painted median area of South Lemay Avenue, the calculated delay is reduced and the level of service improves for the minor street movements. In the morning peak hour, the calculated delay is less than the observed delay. In the afternoon peak hour, the calculated delay is higher than the observed delay, however with the one vehicle storage, it is much closer to it. In order to present a range of delays, both analyses will be presented in this report. The City of Fort Collins recently conducted a signal warrant study ' of the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection. The systems warrant was satisfied, but no other signal warrants were met. It is not likely that a signal would be installed based solely on this single warrant. ' However, as traffic volumes increase on both South Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard, other warrants may be met in the future. Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalks exist along South Lemay Avenue adjacent to and to the ' north of the Eagle Cliffs site. It is expected that there will be sidewalks on both sides of South Lemay Avenue when the Fossil Creek Park development is completed. There are sidewalks along Southridge Greens Boulevard, both east and west of South Lemay Avenue. Bicycle Facilities There are bicycle facilities along South Lemay Avenue. There are ' bike lanes on the west leg of Southridge Greens Boulevard, even though it is classified as a local street. There are bike lanes on the east leg of Southridge Greens Boulevard. 1 5 T m E (D N J C N 7 Q O co 00 M 0) cM st O O 00 tQ C7 LO CO I- N 100/62 1011 I� J � � �11/13 77/26 51 /17 6/3 —► O LO v 20/6 N � d' O O LO CV) M N LO • AM/PM RECENT (2002) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4 N 121l76 DoSouthridge Greens 32/110 Boulevard Figure 2 li SITE LOCATION t 0 Southridge Greens 1 Boulevard Eagle Cliffs SCALE: 1 "=2000' Figure 1 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The location of Eagle Cliffs is shown in Figure 1. It is important that a thorough understanding of the existing conditions be presented. ' Land Use Land uses in the area are primarily recreational, institutional, and residential. Southridge Greens Golf Course is near to the site to the southeast, across South Lemay Avenue. The proposed Fossil Creek Park is south of the site, across Fossil Creek. St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Church is in the northeast quadrant of the South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection. Werner Elementary School is located to the northwest of Eagle Cliffs. Residential uses exist throughout the area. The center of Fort Collins lies to the north of Eagle Cliffs. Streets The primary streets near the Eagle Cliffs site are South Lemay Avenue and Southridge Greens Boulevard. South Lemay Avenue is to the east of Eagle Cliffs. It is a north -south street designated as a four - lane arterial in the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. In this area, South Lemay Avenue currently has a four -lane cross section. Just south of this site, South Lemay Avenue narrows to a two-lane cross section. It will be widened to a four -lane arterial cross section with the Fossil Creek Park development. Widening will likely occur on the west side of South Lemay Avenue. This will minimize the existing horizontal curve on South Lemay Avenue. It will also maximize the distance between South Lemay Avenue and the 14`h hole on Southridge Greens Golf Course. South Lemay Avenue is posted at 40 mph. Southridge Greens Boulevard is north of Eagle Cliffs. It is an east -west street designated as a collector to the east of South Lemay Avenue on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. To the west of South Lemay Avenue, it is designated as a local street. Southridge Greens Boulevard has stop sign control at its intersection with South Lemay Avenue. There are raised medians on Southridge Greens Boulevard, both east and west of South Lemay Avenue. ' Existing Traffic ' Recent peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. These counts were obtained in January 2002. Raw count data is provided in Appendix B. ' Existing Operation ' The South Lemay/Southridge Greens intersection was evaluated using techniques provided in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Using the peak 1 2 I. INTRODUCTION ' This transportation impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements at and near the proposed Eagle Cliffs residential development. Eagle Cliffs is located west of South Lemay Avenue, south of Southridge Greens Boulevard in Fort Collins, Colorado. During the course of the analysis, numerous contacts were made with the project planning consultant (VF Ripley Associates), the Fort Collins Transportation Planning Staff, and the Fort Collins Traffic Engineering Staff. The Transportation Impact Study Base Assumptions form is provided in Appendix A. This study generally conforms to the format set forth in the Fort Collins transportation impact study guidelines. The study involved the following steps: - Collect physical, traffic, and development data; - Perform trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment; - Determine peak hour traffic volumes; - Conduct capacity and operational level of service analyses on key intersections; - Analyze signal warrants; - Conduct level of service evaluation of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of transportation. 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location ........................................ 3 2. Recent (2002) Peak Hour Traffic ...................... 4 3. Site Plan ............................................ 8 4. Trip Distribution .................................... 9 5. Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Traffic ...... 11 6. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic ..................... 12 7. Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Traffic ........... 13 8. Short Range (2005) Geometry .......................... 17 APPENDIX A Base Assumptions Form B Recent Peak Hour Traffic C Existing Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Descriptions/Fort Collins Motor Vehicle LOS Standards D Peak Hour Signal Warrant Analysis E Short Range Background Peak Hour Operation F Short Range Total Peak Hour Operation (Conventional and Roundabout) G Pedestrian/Bicycle/Transit Level of Service Worksheets TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction ......................................... 1 II. Existing Conditions .................................. 2 LandUse ............................................. 2 Streets.............................................. 2 Existing Traffic ..................................... 2 ExistingOperation ................................... 2 Pedestrian Facilities ................................ 5 Bicycle Facilities .................................... 5 Transit Facilities ................................... 6 III. Proposed Development ... 7 Trip Generation ...................................... 7 Trip Distribution .................................... 7 Background Traffic Projections ....................... 10 Trip Assignment ...................................... 10 SignalWarrants ...................................... 10 Operation Analysis ................................... 10 Pedestrian Level of Service .......................... 16 Bicycle Level of Service ............................. 18 Transit Level of Service ............................. 18 IV. Conclusions .......................................... 19 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Recent (2002) Peak Hour Operation .................... 6 2. Trip Generation ...................................... 7 3. Short Range (2005) Background Peak Hour Operation .... 14 4. Short Range (2005) Total Peak Hour Operation ......... 15 EAGLE CLIFFS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO FEBRUARY 2002 Prepared for: Eagle Cliffs, LLC 2655 Midpoint Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 970-669-2061 FAX: 970-669-5034 oPPpO REc. 777